Bilgi paylaşımı liderliği ölçeğinin (BPLÖ) Türk kültürüne uyarlanması: Geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışması

Öz

Bilgi paylaşımı liderliği, örgüt içinde bilgi alışverişini teşvik eden ve çalışanların kolektif öğrenme süreçlerine katılımını artıran bir liderlik anlayışıdır. Bilgi paylaşımı liderliği, özellikle eğitim kurumlarında öğretmenler arasındaki iş birliğini ve mesleki gelişimi destekleyerek okul kültürünü güçlendirmektedir. Bu araştırma, Hassanreza Zeinabadi ve Hossein Abbasian tarafından İran kültüründe geliştirilen 24 madde ve 5 boyuttan oluşan “Bilgi Paylaşımı Liderliği Ölçeği”nin Türk kültürüne uyarlanmasını amaçlamaktadır. Araştırma nicel yaklaşımla tarama modelinde betimsel bir araştırma olarak yürütülmüştür. Mevcut araştırmada, ölçeğin İngilizce formu esas alınmıştır. Ölçek maddeleri alınan dönütlere göre düzenlenerek dil ve anlatım açısından uygun bir düzeye getirilmiştir. Ölçeğin yapı geçerliği ise 2024-2025 eğitim-öğretim yılında uygun örnekleme yöntemiyle ulaşılan ve Türkiye’nin 47 ilinde farklı okul kademelerinde görev yapan 377 öğretmenden elde edilen verilerle incelenmiştir. 24 madde ve 5 boyuttan oluşan ölçeğin geçerlik çalışması kapsamında orijinal ölçekten elde edilen faktör yapısı birinci ve ikinci düzey doğrulayıcı faktör analiziyle (DFA) test edilmiştir. DFA sonucunda madde yük değerleri oldukça düşük olan 3 madde silinmiştir. Böylece ölçeğin Türk kültüründe 21 madde ve 5 boyutta (rol model olma, güven inşa etme, beklentileri belirleme, bilgi paylaşımına dayalı ortam oluşturma ve öğretmenleri teşvik etme) uygun uyum iyiliği değerlerine sahip olduğu saptanmıştır. Ayrıca ölçeğin Cronbach’ın Alpha (α) ve McDonald’s Omega (𝜔) güvenirlik katsayıları da hesaplanmış olup tüm güvenirlik değerlerinin 0.70’in üzerinde olduğu belirlenmiştir. Sonuç olarak bu araştırmada, ölçeğin Türk kültürüne uyarlamasının gerekli geçerlik ve güvenirlik kanıtlarını sağlamış olduğu ve okul müdürlerinin bilgi paylaşımı liderlik düzeylerini değerlendirmek için güvenilir ve geçerli bir ölçüm aracı olarak kullanılabileceği anlaşılmıştır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• bilgi paylaşımı liderliği
• geçerlik ve güvenirlik
• okul müdürleri
• ölçek uyarlama

Adaptation of the knowledge-sharing leadership scale to Turkish Culture: A validity and reliability study

Öz

Knowledge sharing leadership is a leadership approach that encourages the exchange of knowledge within the organisation and increases the participation of employees in collective learning processes. Knowledge sharing leadership strengthens school culture by supporting collaboration and professional development among teachers, especially in educational institutions. This study aims to adapt the ‘Knowledge Sharing Leadership Scale’, which consists of 24 items and 5 dimensions developed by Hassanreza Zeinabadi and Hossein Abbasian in Iranian culture, to Turkish culture. The research was conducted as a descriptive research in survey model with quantitative approach. In the current study, the English form of the scale was taken as a basis. The scale items were organised according to the feedback received and brought to a suitable level in terms of language and expression. The construct validity of the scale was examined with the data obtained from 377 teachers working at different school levels in 47 provinces of Turkey in the 2024-2025 academic year. Within the scope of the validity study of the scale consisting of 24 items and 5 dimensions, the factor structure obtained from the original scale was tested with first and second level confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). As a result of CFA, 3 items with very low item loadings were deleted. Thus, the scale was found to have 21 items and 5 dimensions (role modelling, building trust, setting expectations, creating an environment based on knowledge sharing and encouraging teachers) with appropriate goodness of fit values in Turkish culture. In addition, Cronbach's Alpha (α) and McDonald's Omega (𝜔) reliability coefficients of the scale were calculated and it was determined that all reliability values were above 0.70. As a result, in this study, it was found that the adaptation of the scale to Turkish culture provided the necessary validity and reliability evidence and can be used as a reliable and valid measurement tool to assess principals' knowledge sharing leadership levels.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Knowledge-sharing leadersihip
• validity and reability
• school principals
• scale adaptation

Kaynakça

1. Abu Nasra, M., & Arar, K. (2020). Leadership style and teacher performance: mediating role of occupational perception. International Journal of Educational Management, 34(1), 186-202. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEM-04-2019-0146
2. Aguinis, H., Gottfredson, R. K., & Joo, H. (2013). Best-practice recommendations for defining, identifying, and handling outliers. Organizational Research Methods, 16(2), 270-301. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428112470848
3. Aksay, B. (2021). Kamu ve özel sektör çalışanlarında bilgi paylaşma korkusu. OPUS–Uluslararası Toplum Araştırmaları Dergisi, 17(37), 4400-4428. https://doi.org/10.26466/opus.868237
4. Alakurt, T., & Keser, H. (2016). Bilgi paylaşma davranışları ölçeği: Ölçek geliştirme çalışması. Kastamonu Eğitim Dergisi, 24(3), 1033-1054.
5. Aljuwaiber, A. (2019). Technology-based vs face-to-face interaction for knowledge sharing in the project teams. International Journal of Project Organisation and Management, 11(3), 227-242. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJPOM.2019.102943
6. Arslan, A., & Yener, S. (2016). Okul yöneticilerinin güdüleyici dili ve öğretmen örtük bilgi paylaşımı ilişkisinde işgören sesliliğinin aracı rolü ve psikolojik rahatlık algısının düzenleyici rolü. 16. İstanbul Üniversitesi İşletme Kongresi. 26-29 Mayıs. İstanbul.
7. Bavik, Y. L., Tang, P. M., Shao, R., & Lam, L. W. (2018). Ethical leadership and employee knowledge sharing: exploring dual–mediation paths. The Leadership Quarterly, 29(2), 322–332. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2017.05.006
8. Bellibaş, M. Ş., Kılınç, A. Ç., & Polatcan, M. (2021). The moderation role of transformational leadership in the effect of instructional leadership on teacher professional learning and ınstructional practice: An integrated leadership perspective. Educational Administration Quarterly, 57(5), 776-814. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X211035079

9. Bhusry, M., & Ranjan, J. (2012). Enhancing the teaching‐learning process: A knowledge management approach. International Journal of Educational Management, 26(3), 313-329. https://doi.org/10.1108/09513541211213372
10. Bock, G.-W., Zmud, R. W., Kim, Y.G., & Lee, J.-N. (2005). Behavioral intention formation in knowledge sharing: Examining the roles of extrinsic motivators, social-psychological forces, and organizational climate. MIS Quarterly, 29(1), 87–111. https://doi.org/10.2307/25148669
11. Cansoy, R., & Turkoglu, M. E. (2022). Practices and constraints of teacher professional learning in a centralized education system. IE: Inquiry in Education, 142(2), 1-22.
12. Carmeli, A., Atwater, L., & Levi, A. (2011). How leadership enhances employees’ knowledge sharing: The intervening roles of relational and organisational identification. The Journal of Technology Transfer 36(3), 257–274. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-010-9154-y
13. Carroll, J. M., Choo, C. W., Dunlap, D. R., Isenhour, P. L., Kerr, S. T., MacLean, A., & Rosson, M. B. (2003). Knowledge management support for teachers. Educational Technology Research and Development, 51(4), 42–64. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02504543
14. Castaneda, D. I., & Cuellar, S. (2020). Knowledge sharing and innovation: a systematic review. Knowledge and Process Management, 27(3), 159–173. https://doi.org/10.1002/kpm.1637
15. Celep, C., & Çetin, B. (2005). Teachers’ perception about the behaviours of school leaders with regard to knowledge management. International Journal of Educational Management 19(2), 102–117.
16. Cheng, E. C. K. (2012). Knowledge strategies for enhancing school learning capacity. International Journal of Education Management, 26(6), 557–592.
17. Cheng, E. C. K. (2020). Knowledge management strategies for sustaining lesson study. International Journal for Lesson and Learning Studies, 9(2), 167-178. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/IJLLS-10-2019-0070
18. Cheng, E. C., & Chu, C. W. (2018). A normative knowledge management model for school development. The International Journal of Learning, 4(1), 76-82.
19. Cheng, E. C. K., Wu, S. W., & Hu, J. (2017). Knowledge management implementation in the school context: Case studies on knowledge leadership, storytelling, and taxonomy. Educational Research for Policy and Practice, 16(2), 177–188.
20. Chu, K. W. (2016a) Beginning a journey of knowledge management in a secondary school. Journal of Knowledge Management , 20(2), 364–385. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/JKM-04-2015-0155
21. Chu, K. W. (2016b). Leading knowledge management in a secondary school. Journal of Knowledge Management, 20(5), 1104-1147. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/JKM-10-2015-0390
22. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Lewrence Erlbaum Associate
23. Collinson, V. (2004). Learning to share, sharing to learn: Fostering organizational learning through teachers' dissemination of knowledge. Journal of Educational Administration, 42(3), 312-332. https://doi.org/10.1108/09578230410534658
24. Comrey, A. L., & Lee, H. B. (2013). A first course in factor analysis. Psychology Press.
25. DeVellis, R. F. (2016). Scale development: Theory and applications. Sage Publications.
26. Draugalis, J. R., Coons, S. J., & Plaza, C. M. (2008). Best practices for survey research reports: A synopsis for authors and reviewers. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 72(1), 1-6. https://doi.org/10.5688/aj720111
27. Duckworth, A. L., & Quinn, P. D. (2009). Development and validation of the Short Grit Scale (GRIT–S). Journal of Personality Assessment, 91(2), 166–174. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223890802634290
28. Ekinci, A. (2012). The effects of social capital levels in elementary schools on organizational information sharing. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 12(4), 2513-2520.
29. Eremenco, S.L., Cella, D., & Arnold, B.J. (2005). A comprehensive method for the translation and cross-cultural validation of health status questionnaires. Evaluation & the Health Professions, 28(2), 212-232. https://doi.org/10.1177/0163278705275342
30. Eryılmaz-Ballı, F., & Önen, Ö. (2019). Okul müdürleri, öğretmenler ve yardımcı personelin okullardaki örgütsel iletişim iklimine yönelik görüşleri. OPUS International Journal of Society Researches, 14(20), 514-550. https://doi.org/10.26466/opus.602779
31. Field, A. (2018). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics. Sage Publications.
32. Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error: Algebra and statistics. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(3), 382-388. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224378101800313
33. Fraenkel, J. R., Wallen, N. E., & Hyun, H. H. (2012). How to design and evaluate research in education. Mc Graw HIll.
34. Fullan, M. (2002). The role of leadership in the promotion of knowledge management in schools. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 8(3), 409–419.
35. Guerriero, S. (2017). Pedagogical knowledge and the changing nature of the teaching profession. OECD Publishing.
36. Gutierrez, C., Field, S., Simmons, J., & Basile, C. G. (2007). Principals as knowledge managers in partner schools. School Leadership and Management, 27(4), 333-346. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632430701563205
37. Güngör, G., & Celep, C. (2016). Ortaöğretim öğretmenlerinin örgüt içi bilgi paylaşımı, örgütsel öğrenme ve entelektüel sermaye düzeyleri arasındaki ilişki. Mersin Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 12(3), 932-947. https://doi.org/10.17860/mersinefd.282391
38. Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2018). Multivariate data analysis. Cangage Learning.
39. Hallinger, P., & Murphy, J. (1985). Assessing the instructional leadership behavior of principals. Elementary School Journal, 86(2), 217–248. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/461445
40. Hambleton, R. K. & Patsula, L. (1999). Increasing the validity of adapted tests: Myths to be avoided and guidelines for improving test adaptation practices. Journal of Applied Testing Technology. 1(1), 1-30.
41. Hancock, G. R., & Mueller, R. O. (2013). Structural equation modeling: A second course (2nd ed.). IAP Information Age Publishing.
42. Harris, A. (2009). Distributed leadership: What we know. In: Harris, A. (eds) Distributed leadership. Studies in sducational leadership, Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-9737-9_2
43. Hayes, A. F., & Coutts, J. J. (2020). Use Omega Rather than Cronbach’s Alpha for Estimating Reliability. But…. Communication Methods and Measures, 14(1), 1-24. https://doi.org/10.1080/19312458.2020.1718629
44. Hew, K. F. & Hara, N. (2007). Identifying factors that encourage and hinder knowledge sharing in a longstanding online community of practice. Journal of Interactive Online Learning, 5(3), 297-3. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-007-9049-2
45. Hiebert, J., Gallimore, R., & Stigler, J. W. (2002). A knowledge base for the teaching profession: What would it look like and how can we get one? Educational Researcher, 31(5), 3-15. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X031005003
46. Hofstede, G., Hofstede, G. J., & Minkov, M. (2010). Cultures and Organizations: Software of the Mind. 3rd Edition. McGraw-Hill.
47. Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1-55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118
48. Huang, C.C., Wang, Y.M., Wu, T.W., & Wang, P.A. (2013). An empirical analysis of the antecedents and performance consequences of using the moodle platform. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 3(2), 217-221. https://doi.org/10.7763/IJIET.2013.V3.267
49. Huck, S. W. (2008). Reading statistics and research. Addison Wesley Longman.
50. International Test Commission. (2017). The ITC Guidelines for Translating and Adapting Tests (Second edition). http://www.intestcom.org/
51. Isenbarger, L., & Zembylas, M. (2006). The emotional labour of caring in teaching. Teaching and Teacher Education, 22(1), 120–134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2005.07.002
52. Kılınç, A. Ç., Bellibaş, M. Ş., & Gümüş, S. (2017). Öğrenme Merkezli Liderlik Ölçeğinin (ÖMLÖ) Türkçeye Uyarlanması: Geçerlik ve Güvenirlik Çalışması. İnönü Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 18(3), 132-144. https://doi.org/10.17679/inuefd.315124
53. Klein, E. D., & Schwanenberg, J. (2022). Ready to lead school improvement? Perceived Professional development needs of principals in Germany. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 50(3), 371-391. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143220933901
54. Kline, R. B. (2023). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (5th ed.). Guilford Press
55. Lakshman, C. (2007). Organizational knowledge leadership: A grounded theory approach. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 28(1), 51-75. https://doi.org/10.1108/01437730710718245
56. Lawshe, C. H. (1975). A quantitative approach to content validity. Personnel Psychology, 28, 563-575. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.1975.tb01393.x
57. Leithwood, K., & Jantzi, D. (1990). Transformational leadership: How principals can help reform school cultures. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 1, 249-280.
58. Leung, C. H. (2010). Critical factors of implementing knowledge management in school environment: A qualitative study in Hong Kong. Research Journal of Information Technology, 2(2), 66–80. http://dx.doi.org/10.3923/rjit.2010.66.80
59. Loughran, J. (2019). Pedagogical reasoning: The foundation of the professional knowledge of teaching. Teachers and Teaching, 25(5), 523–535. https://doi.org/10.1080/13540602.2019.1633294
60. Mawhinney, L. (2010). Let’s lunch and learn: professional knowledge sharing in teachers’ lounges and other congregational spaces. Teaching and Teacher Education, 26(4), 972–978. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2009.10.039
61. McDonald, R. P. (2013). Test theory: A unified treatment. Psychology Press.
62. Millî Eğitim Bakanlığı [MEB]. (2015). Millî Eğitim Bakanlığı Öğretmen Atama Ve Yer Değiştirme Yönetmeliği. https://oygm.meb.gov.tr/meb_iys_dosyalar/2017_11/08144242_mevzuat.pdf
63. Millî Eğitim Bakanlığı [MEB]. (2018). 2023 Eğitim Vizyonu. http:// 2023vizyonu.meb.gov.tr/doc/2023_EGITIM_VIZYONU.pdf
64. Millî Eğitim Bakanlığı [MEB]. (2023). Kapsayıcı eğitim bağlamında okul yöneticilerinin mesleki gelişimi projesi. Öğretmen Yetiştirme Ve Geliştirme Genel Müdürlüğü.
65. https://oygm.meb.gov.tr/www/kapsayici-egitim-baglaminda-okul-yoneticilerinin-mesleki-gelisimi-projesi/icerik/1140
66. Neuman, W. L. (2008). Social research methods: Qualitative and quantitative approaches. Pearson
67. OECD, (2020). TALIS 2018 Results (Volume II): Teachers and School Leaders as Valued Professionals. TALIS, OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/19cf08df-en.
68. Öneren, M., Çiftçi, G. E. & Harman, A. (2016). Bilgi paylaşımının yenilikçi davranışa ve örgütsel güvene etkisi üzerine bir araştırma. Akademik Bakış Dergisi, 58, 127-157.
69. Petrides, L. A., & Guiney, S. Z. (2022). Knowledge Management for School Leaders: An Ecological Framework for Thinking Schools. Teachers College Record, 104(8), 1702-1717. https://doi.org/10.1177/016146810210400807
70. Polatcan, M., & Cansoy, R. (2020). Liderlik etme motivasyonu ölçeğinin Türk kültürüne uyarlanması. İnsan ve Toplum Bilimleri Araştırmaları Dergisi, 9(2), 1263-1288. https://doi.org/10.15869/itobiad.678423
71. Politis, J. D. (2001). The relationship of various leadership styles to knowledge management. Leadership and Organization Development Journal, 22(8), 354-364.
72. Putrika, C. S., & Syahrizal, S. (2021). Interpersonal trust and knowledge sharing: The moderating role of leadership support. Human Resource Management Studies, 1(4), 237–245
73. Ribiere, V. M., & Sitar, A. S. (2003). Critical role of leadership in nurturing a knowledge-supporting culture. Knowledge Management Research & Practice, 1(1), 39–48.
74. Rismark, M., & Sølvberg, A. M. (2011). Knowledge sharing in schools: A key to developing professional learning communities. World Journal of Education, 1(2), 150-160.
75. Runhaar, P., & Sanders, K. (2016). Promoting teachers’ knowledge sharing. The fostering roles of occupational self-efficacy and human resources management. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 44(5), 794-813. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143214564773
76. Sallis, E., & Jones, G. (2013). Knowledge management in education: Enhancing learning & education. Routledge.
77. Sedgwick, P. (2014). Convenience sampling. BMJ, 348, g1677. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.g1215
78. Schumacker, R. E., & Lomax, R. G. (2004). A beginner's guide to structural equation modeling. Lawrence Erlbaum Ass.
79. Shih, W. L., & Tsai, C. Y. (2016). The effects of knowledge management capabilities on perceived school effectiveness in career and technical education. Journal of Knowledge Management, 20(6), 1373–1392. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/JKM-12-2015-0515
80. Skyrme, D. J. (2000). Developing a knowledge strategy: from management to leadership. In Morey, D. & Thuraisingham, B. (eds) Knowledge management, classic and contemporary works (pp. 61–84). MIT Press.
81. Sousa, V. D., & Rojjanasrirat, W. (2011). Translation, adaptation and validation of instruments or scales for use in cross‐cultural health care research: A clear and user‐friendly guideline. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, 17(2), 268-274. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2753.2010.01434.x
82. Swart, F., de Graaff, R., Onstenk, J., & Knezic, D. (2017). Teacher educators’ personal practical knowledge of language. Teachers and Teaching, 24(2), 166–182. https://doi.org/10.1080/13540602.2017.1368477
83. Şentürk, F. K., & Carman, Y. (2019). Örgüt kültürünün ve örgütsel adaletin bilgi paylaşımı üzerine etkisi: Bir devlet üniversitesi örneği. Alanya Akademik Bakış, 3(1), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.29023/alanyaakademik.492117
84. Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2013). Using multivariate statistics (6th ed.). Pearson Education.
85. Thambi, M., & O’Toole, P. (2012). Applying a knowledge management taxonomy to secondary schools. School Leadership & Management, 32(1), 102-91. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13632434.2011.642350
86. Türe Yılmaz, A., & Yıldırım, A. (2018). İletişim ve Bilgi Paylaşımı Ölçeği’nin Türkçe geçerlik ve güvenirliği. Akademik Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi, 6(70), 76-90.
87. Veneziano, L., & Hooper J. (1997). A method for quantifying content validity of health-related questionnaires. American Journal of Health Behavior, 21(1), 67-70.
88. Viitala, R. (2004). Towards knowledge leadership. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 25(6), 528-544. https://doi.org/10.1108/01437730410556761
89. Wang, S., & Noe, R. A. (2010). Knowledge sharing: A review and directions for future research. Human Resource Management Review, 20(2), 115–131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2009.10.001
90. Widen, G. (2017). Individual, social, and cultural approaches to knowledge sharing. Journal of Information Science Theory and Practice, 5(3), 6–14. https://doi.org/10.1633/JISTAP.2017.5.3.1
91. Widén-Wulff, G., & Ginman, M. (2004). Explaining knowledge sharing in organizations through the dimensions of social capital. Journal of Information Science, 30(5), 448-458. https://doi.org/10.1177/0165551504046997
92. Wilson, T. D. (1981). On user studies and information needs. Journal of Documentation, 37, 3-15. https://doi.org/10.1108/eb026702
93. Xue, Y., Bradley, J., & Liang, H. (2011). Team climate, empowering leadership, and knowledge sharing. Journal of Knowledge Management, 5(2), 299–312. https://doi.org/10.1108/13673271111119709
94. Zeinabadi, H. (2022). Principals' role in teachers' knowledge-sharing beliefs, intention and behaviour in Iranian schools: Exploring the impact of knowledge-sharing leadership. Journal of Educational Administration, 60(5), 493-510. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEA-09-2021-0168
95. Zeinabadi, H. (2023). Breaking down the walls of weak knowledge-sharing among Iranian teachers: Investigating a less-considered leadership role of principals. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 51(1), 176-197. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143220968160
96. Zeinabadi, H., & Abbasian, H. (2024). Principal’s leadership and teacher-to-teacher knowledge-sharing in Iranian schools: Developing and validating a multi-dimensional scale. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 52(3), 711-739. https://doi.org/10.1177/17411432221095947
97. Zeinabadi, H., Kouhsari, M., & Gurr, D. (2023). Exploring instructional leadership in Iranian primary schools: Perspective of successful principals. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 26(5), 819-836. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603124.2020.1853244