Sosyal duygusal öğrenme üzerine geliştirilen alternatif programlara genel bakış

Öz

Bu çalışma, erken çocukluk döneminde sosyal ve duygusal becerilerinin gelişimine yönelik oluşturulan eğitim programlarına karşılaştırmalı genel bir bakış sunmayı amaçlamaktadır. Araştırmalar ile etkililiği onaylanmış olan programlar arasından bu araştırma için seçilmiş önleyici programlar; WITS, INSIGHTS Intervention, The Incredible Years, Michigan Model for Health, I Can Problem Solve, Captain McFinn: Explore Kindness, PAX Good Behavior Game, Tuning in to Kids ve Kimochis yer almaktadır. Çalışma, bu programların amaçlarını, niteliklerini, uygulama alanlarını ve sonuçlarını ele alarak, sosyal-duygusal öğrenme alanındaki mevcut durumu daha iyi anlamaya katkıda bulunmayı hedeflemektedir. Araştırma, nitel araştırma desenlerinden doküman analizi modelinde yürütülmüştür. Araştırmanın örneklemi, olasılığa dayalı olmayan amaçlı örnekleme yöntemi kullanılarak belirlenmiştir. Araştırmada elde edilen verilerin analizinde doküman analizi yöntemi kullanılmıştır. Bulgularda 9 önleyici program ayrıntılı olarak ele alınmıştır. Programlar, tartışma bölümünde, her program için hedef yaş grubu, eğitim süresi, eğitim kiti, sosyal-duygusal öğrenme beceri, programların amaçları, eğitmen eğitimleri, aile katılımları, toplum katılımı açılarından incelenmiştir. Okul öncesi dönem çocuklarının sosyal duygusal öğrenme becerilerini geliştirmek için eğitimcilerin, araştırmacıların ve ebeveynlerin sosyal duygusal öğrenme programları kullanmalarının faydalı olacağı düşünülmektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Sosyal ve duygusal öğrenme
• eğitim programları
• okul öncesi eğitimi
• önleyici programlar

An overview of alternative programs developed for social and emotional learning

Abstract

This study aims to provide a comparative overview of educational programs designed for the development of social and emotional skills in early childhood. The selected preventive programs for this research, which have been validated for effectiveness through various studies, include WITS, INSIGHTS Intervention, The Incredible Years, Michigan Model for Health, I Can Problem Solve, Captain McFinn: Explore Kindness, PAX Good Behavior Game, Tuning in to Kids, and Kimochis. By examining the goals, characteristics, areas of implementation, and outcomes of these programs, the study seeks to contribute to a better understanding of the current state of social-emotional learning. The research was conducted using the document analysis model, one of the qualitative research designs. The sample of the study was determined using a non-probabilistic purposive sampling method. Document analysis was employed to analyze the data obtained in the study. In the findings, nine preventive programs were examined in detail. In the discussion section, the programs were analyzed in terms of target age group, duration of training, educational kit, social-emotional learning skills, program objectives, trainer education, family involvement, and community participation. It is suggested that educators, researchers, and parents use social-emotional learning programs to improve the social-emotional learning skills of preschool children.

Keywords

• Social and emotional learning
• educational programs
• preschool education
• intervention programs

Kaynakça

1. Akcan, A., & Ergün, A. (2017). Okul öncesi dönemde saldırgan davranışın önlenmesinde bir girişim programı. Türkiye Klinikleri Journal of Nursing Sciences, 9(2), 177-184. https://doi.org/10.5336/nurses.2016-52864
2. Aksoy, P. (2019). Prevention programs for the development of social-emotional learning in preschool years. Online Submission, 6(6), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3406762
3. Aktaş, Ç. S. (2024). Ubd temelli sosyal duygusal öğrenme becerileri programının okul öncesi çocuklarının sosyal duygusal öğrenme becerileri üzerindeki etkisinin incelenmesi (Yayımlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi). Bahçeşehir Üniversitesi:İstanbul.
4. Ambrosi, C., Kavanagh, P., & Havighurst, S. (2022). The development of an adapted coparenting program: tuning in to kids together. International Journal of Systemic Therapy, 1-22. https://doi.org/10.1080/2692398X.2021.2010464
5. Apaydın Demirci, Z. & Yıldız Bıçakçı, M. (2023). “Yapabilirim" sosyal duygusal öğrenme programının okul öncesi çocukların sosyal becerilerine etkisinin incelenmesi, Journal of Social, Humanities and Administrative Sciences, 9(69), 3637-3647. http://dx.doi.org/10.29228/JOSH AS.72252
6. Barcellini, F., Détienne, F., & Burkhardt, J. M. (2010). Distributed design and distributed social awareness: Exploring inter-subjective dimensions of roles. In Proceedings of COOP 2010: Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Designing Cooperative Systems, May, 18-21, 2010, Aix-en-Provence (s. 3-23). Springer London. https://doi:10.3233/WOR-2012-1036-3511
7. Barnes, T. N., Wang, F., & O'Brien, K. M. (2018). A meta‐analytic review of social problem‐solving interventions in preschool settings. Infant and Child Development, 27(5), e2095. https://doi.org/10.1002/icd.2095
8. Barrish, H., Saunders, M., & Wolfe, M. (1969). Good Behavior Game. Effects of individual contingencies for group consequences and disruptive behavior in a classroom. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 2, 119-124. https://doi.org/10.1901/jaba.1969.2-119

9. Bayrak, H. U., & Akman, B. (2018). Adaptation of the “incredible years child training program” and investigation of the effectiveness of the program. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 18(2). https://doi.org/10.12738/estp.2018.2.0259
10. Bayramlı, Ü. Ü. (2017). Zaman yönetimi öz yönetim – zaman tuzakları – zaman yönetim teknikleri (2. baskı). Seçkin Yayıncılık.
11. Bierman, K. L., & Motamedi, M. (2015). Social and emotional learning programs for preschool children. Handbook of social and emotional learning: Research and practice, 135-151.
12. Bilir Seyhan, G., Ocak Karabay, S., Arda Tuncdemir, T. B., Greenberg, M. T., ve Domitrovich, C. (2019). The effects of Promoting Alternative Thinking Strategies Preschool Program on teacher–children relationships and children's social competence in Turkey. International Journal of Psychology, 54(1), 61-69. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijop.12426
13. Blewitt, C., O’connor, A., Morris, H., Mousa, A., Bergmeier, H., Nolan, A., ... & Skouteris, H. (2020). Do curriculum-based social and emotional learning programs in early childhood education and care strengthen teacher outcomes? A systematic literature review. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(3), 1049. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17031049
14. Boyle, D. ve Hassett-Walker, C. (2008) Reducing overt and relational aggression among young children, Journal of School Violence, 7(1), 27-42. https://doi.org/10.1300/J202v07n01_03
15. Bridgeland, J., Bruce, M. ve Hariharan, A. (2013). The missing piece: a national teacher survey on how social and emotional learning can empower children and transform schools. A report for casel. Civic Enterprises. Bronfenbrenner, U. (1994). Ecological models of human development. International encyclopedia of education, 3(2), 37-43.
16. Brotman-Miller, L., Calzada, E., Huang, K., Kingston, S., Dawson-McClure, S., Kamboukos, D., Petkova, E. (2011). Promoting effective parenting practices and preventing child behavior problems in school among ethnically diverse families from underserved, urban communities. Child Development, 82, 258–276. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2010.01554.x
17. Captain McFinn (2022). Captain McFinn and Friends. https://www.captainmcfinn.com/
18. CASEL. (2023a). What is the casel framework?. https://casel.org/fundamentals-of-sel/what-is-the-casel-framework/ adresinden erişildi.
19. CASEL. (2023b). Fundamentals of SEL. https://casel.org/fundamentals-of-sel/ adresinden erişildi. Core, S. H. H. (2020). Results for the Captain McFinn Explore Kindness: Social skills curriculum. Penn State Behrend, Erie Pennsylvania.https://www.captainmcfinn.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/03/Final-Brief-Results-Captain-McFinn-2017.pdf
20. Dotsenkoa, E. L., Startsevaa, V. A., Pchelinaa, O. V., Karaberovab, E. V., & Ivantsovab, N. (2020). Responsible decision making as primary school children move into adolescence. International Journal of Emotional Education, 12(2), 90-102.
21. Durlak, J. A., Mahoney, J. L., & Boyle, A. E. (2022). What we know, and what we need to find out about universal, school-based social and emotional learning programs for children and adolescents: A review of meta-analyses and directions for future research. Psychological Bulletin, 148(11-12), 765. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000383
22. Durlak, J. A., Weissberg, R. P., Dymnicki, A. B., Taylor, R. D ve Schellinger, K. B. (2011). The impact of enhancing students’ social and emotional learning: A meta‐analysis of school‐based universal interventions. Child Development, 82(1), 405-432. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2010.01564.x
23. Ekinci-Vural, D. (2006). Okul öncesi eğitim programındaki duyuşsal ve sosyal becerilere yönelik hedeflere uygun olarak hazırlanan aile katılımlı sosyal beceri eğitim programının çocuklarda sosyal becerilerin gelişimine etkisi (Yayımlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi), Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi: İzmir.
24. Elias, M.J., & Moceri, D.C. (2012). Developing social and emotional aspects of learning: the American experience. Research Papers in Education, 27(4), 423-434. https://doi.org/10.1080/02671522.2012.690243
25. Embry, D., & Biglan, A. (2008). Evidence-based kernels: Fundamental units of behavioral influence. Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review, 11(3), 75-113. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10567-008-0036-x
26. Epstein, J. L. (2013). Ready or not? Preparing future educators for school, family, and community partnerships. Teaching Education, 24(2), 115-118. https://doi.org/10.1080/10476210.2013.786887
27. Epstein, R., Warfel, R., Johnson, J., Smith, R., & McKinney, P. (2013). Which relationship skills count most?. Journal of Couple & Relationship Therapy, 12(4), 297-313. https://doi.org/10.1080/15332691.2013.836047
28. Erbil, F. (2021). SDÖ kavramsal çerçeve ve eğitim programı ilişkisi. M. Göl-Güven (Ed.), Çocuklukta sosyal ve duygusal öğrenme içinde (s. 72-106). Yeni İnsan.
29. Explore Kindness. (2022). McFinn. Explore Kindness. https://www.explorekindness.com/
30. Fives, H., Hamman, D., & Olivarez, A. (2007). Does burnout begin with student teaching? Analyzing efficacy, burnout, and support during the student-teaching semester. Teaching and Teacher Education, 23, 916-934. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2006.03.013
31. Freebody, P. (2003). Qualitative research in education: Interaction and practice. SAGE Publications.
32. Garbacz, S. A., Swanger-Gagné, M. S., & Sheridan, S. M. (2015). The role of school-family partnership programs for promoting student SEL. In J. A. Durlak, C. E. Domitrovich, R. P. Weissberg, & T. P. Gullotta (Eds.), Handbook of social and emotional learning (s. 244– 259). New York, NY: Guilford.
33. Gershon, P., & Pellitteri, J. (2018). Promoting emotional intelligence in preschool education: A review of programs. International Journal of Emotional Education, 10(2), 26-41.
34. Gil Luciano, B., Ruiz, F., Valdivia, S., & Suarez, F. (2017). Promoting psychological fexibility on tolerance tasks: Framing behavior through deictic/hierarchical relations and specifying augmental functions. The Psychological Record, 67(1), 1-9.
35. Glesne, C. (2011). Becoming qualitative researchers. (A. Ersoy & P. Yalçınoğlu, Çev.). Pearson.
36. Glickman, C. D. (1993). Renewing America’s schools: A guide for school-based action. Jossey-Bass Publishers.
37. Göl-Güven, M. (2021). SDÖ tanımı, kavramsal çerçevesi, modeller ve yöntemler. M. Göl-Güven (Ed.), Çocuklukta sosyal ve duygusal öğrenme içinde (s. 27-71). Yeni İnsan Yayınevi.
38. Göl-Güven, M. (2022). Sosyal ve duygusal öğrenmeye dair: Tanımı, kuramsal çerçevesi ve uygulamaları. Alternatif Eğitim Dergisi, 7(15), 9-18.
39. Gordon, R., Kane, T. J., & Staiger, D. O. (2006). Identifying effective teachers using performance on the job. Hamilton Project Discussion Paper. https://www.brookings.edu/ wp-content/uploads/2016/06/200604hamilton_1.pdf
40. Hoepfl, M. C. (1997). Choosing qualitative research: A primer for technology education researchers. Journal of Technology Education, 9(1), 47-63. https://doi.org/10.21061/jte.v9i1.a.4
41. ICPS. (2022). I Can Problem Solve. https://www.icanproblemsolve.org/
42. ICPS. (2023). I Can Problem Solve. https://www.icanproblemsolve.org/icps/
43. Jennings, P. A., & Greenberg, M. T. (2009). The prosocial classroom: Teacher social and emotional competence in relation to student and classroom outcomes. Review of Educational Research, 79 (1), 491-525. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654308325693
44. Jones, S. M., Brush, K. E., Ramirez, T., Mao, Z. X., Marenus, M., Wettje, S., Finney, K., Raisch, N., Podoloff, N., Kahn, J., Barnes, S., Stickle, L., Brion-Meisels, G., McIntyre, J., Cuartas, J. ve Bailey R. (2021). Looking inside and Across 33 leading SEL Pprograms: A practical resource for schools and ost providers; revised and expanded 2nd edition (preschool and elementary focus). Harvard Graduate School of Education. https://www.wallacefoundation.org/knowledge-center/pages/navigating-social-and-emotional-learning-from-the-inside-out.aspx adresinden erişildi.
45. Jones, M. C., Smith, K., & Johnston, D. W. (2005). Exploring the Michigan model: The relationship of personality, managerial support and organizational structure with health outcomes in entrants to the healthcare environment. Work & Stress, 19(1), 1-22. https://doi.org/10.1080/02678370500065325
46. Karasar, N. (2005). Bilimsel araştırma yöntemi (15. baskı). Nobel Yayın Dağıtım.
47. Kargı, E. (2009). Bilişsel yaklaşıma dayalı kişiler arası sorun çözme becerileri kazandırma (BSÇ) programının etkililiği: Okul öncesi dönem çocukları üzerinde bir araştırma (Yayımlanmamış doktora tezi). Ankara Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü:Ankara.
48. Kaufman, B. (2016). Kimochis®: The Effects of a Social and Emotional Learning Program on Early Childhood Outcomes (Doctoral dissertation) Central Michigan University.
49. KIMOCHIS. (2022). Creating confident, connected, and compassionate kids!. https://www.kimochis.com/training/ adresinden erişildi.
50. KIMOCHIS. (2022). PreK,TK&K Curriculum Training. https://www.kimochis.com/ecc-training/ adresinden erişildi.
51. Koç Tüylü, D. (2024). Erken çocuklukta sosyal duygusal öğrenme becerilerini desteklemeye yönelik öğretmen mesleki eğitim programının geliştirilmesi ve etkililiğinin incelenmesi (Yayınlanmamış Doktora Tezi). Bursa Uludağ Üniversitesi: Bursa.
52. Kuru, N. (2024). 8. bölüm. N. Kuru ve D. Güzeldere Aydın (Eds.), Dünyada ve Türkiye’de erken çocuklukta sosyal duygusal öğrenme programları içinde (s. 353-369). Eğiten Kitap.
53. Leadbeater, B., & Sukhawathanakul, P. (2011). Multicomponent programs for reducing peer victimization in early elementary school: A longitudinal evaluation of the WITS primary program. Journal of Community Psychology, 39(5), 606-620. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcop.20447
54. Leadbeater, B., Sukhawathanakul, P., Sklar, N., & Smith, A. (2010). Peer victimization in rural and urban communities: Understanding and addressing differences. Manuscript submitted for publication.
55. Learning Forward. (2018). High-quality curricula and team-based professional learning: A perfect partnership for equity. https://learningforward.org/report/high-quality-curricula-and-team-based-professional-learning-a-perfect-partnership-for-equity/
56. Lindberg, E. N. (2017). Aile katılımı: Bir kavramsal ve durumsal analiz çalışması. Uluslararası Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi (13), 51-72.
57. McClowry, S. G. (2002). The temperament profiles of school-age children. Journal of Pediatric Nursing, 17, 3–10. https://doi.org/10.1053/jpdn.2002.30929
58. McClowry, S. G., Snow, D. L., & Tamis-LeMonda, C. S. (2005). An evaluation of the effects of INSIGHTS on the behavior of inner city primary school children. Journal of Primary Prevention, 26, 567–584. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10935-005-0015-7
59. McCormick, M. P., Cappella, E., O’Connor, E. E., & McClowry, S. G. (2015). Context matters for social-emotional learning: Examining variation in program impact by dimensions of school climate. American Journal of Community Psychology, 56, 101-119. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10464-015-9733-z
60. Merriam, S. B. (2009). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation. Jossey-Bass. Michigan Model for Health. (2022). Michigan Model for Health. Michigan Model for Health: https://www.michiganmodelforhealth.org/
61. Miles, M, B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded Sourcebook. (2nd ed). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
62. Morin, A. (2011). Self-awareness part 1: Definition, measures, effects, functions, and antecedents. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 5 (10), 807-823. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-9004.2011.00387.x
63. Murano, D., Sawyer, J. E., & Lipnevich, A. A. (2020). A meta-analytic review of preschool social and emotional learning interventions. Review of Educational Research, 90(2), 227-263. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654320914743
64. Nese, M. (2020). Tuning in to Kids in Schools: Emotional Competence Training of School Staff to Promote Better Student-Teacher Relations and Emotional Competence in Teachers (Yayımlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi). Oslo Üniversitesi: Oslo.
65. Newman, J., & Dusenbury, L. (2015). Social and emotional learning (SEL): A framework for academic, social, and emotional success. In K. Bosworth (Ed.), Prevention science in school settings (s. 287-306). Springer.
66. O’Connor, E.E.; Cappella, E.; McCormick, M.P.; McClowry, S.G. (2014). An examination of the efficacy of INSIGHTS in enhancing the academic and behavioral development of children in early grades. Journal of Educational Psychology, 106, 1156–1169. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0036615
67. Ogelman, H. G., Sarıkaya, H. E., Güngör, H., & Körükçü, Ö. (2019). Examining the effect of social-emotional prevention program on social and communication skills of disadvantaged preschool children. International Journal of Academic Research in Education, 4(1-2), 27-40. https://doi.org/10.17985/ijare.525173
68. Öğülmüş, S. (2001). Kişiler arası sorun çözme becerileri ve eğitimi. Nobel Yayıncılık.
69. Ömeroğlu, E., Büyüköztürk, Ş., Aydoğan, Y., Diğerleri, V., Çakan, M., Çakmak, E. K., ... & Karayol, S. (2015). Okul öncesi sosyal beceri destek projesinde geliştirilen ölçme-değerlendirme araç ve yöntemlerinin tanıtımı. Muğla Sıtkı Koçman Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 2(1), 74-83. https://doi.org/10.21666/mskuefd.28115
70. O'neill, J. M., Clark, J. K., & Jones, J. A. (2011). Promoting mental health and preventing substance abuse and violence in elementary students: a randomized control study of the Michigan Model for Health. Journal of School Health, 81(6), 320-330. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1746-1561.2011.00597.x
71. Özdemir Beceren, B., & Zembat, R. (2016). The Effect of Strong Start Social Emotional Learning Program on social and emotional development of five-year-old children. Journal of Human Sciences, 13(1), 1003-1016. http://dx.doi.org/10.14687/ijhs.v13i1.3475
72. Özgünlü, M. (2021). SDÖ farklı kavramsallaştırmaların programlarla ilişkisi. M. Göl-Güven (Ed.), Çocuklukta sosyal ve duygusal öğrenme içinde (s. 107-139). Yeni insan. https://doi.org/10.59617/efepub20233
73. Özkara, E. (2021). Öğretmenlerin SDÖ bilgileri, inançları ve uygulamaları. M. Göl-Güven (Ed.), Çocuklukta sosyal ve duygusal öğrenme içinde (s. 205-234). Yeni İnsan. https://doi.org/10.52597/buje.953597
74. Paxis Institute. (2022). www.paxis.org/pax-good-behavior-game adresinden erişildi.
75. Phillips, A. G. (2020). Self-awareness. In V. Zeigler-Hill & T. K. Shackelford (Eds.), Encyclopedia of personality and individual differences (s. 4656–4663). Springer. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-28099-8_2026-1
76. Pomeroy, B. (2022). Promotıng mental well-being: Educators' perceptıons of mental well-being practıces and programs for includıng all students (Yayımlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi). University of Manitoba: Manitoba.
77. Saltalı, N. (2010). Duyu eğitiminin okulöncesi dönem çocuklarının duygusal becerilerine etkisi (Yayınlanmamış Doktora Tezi). Selçuk Üniversitesi: Konya.
78. Selimoğlu, Ö. G., & Özdemir, S. (2018). Etkileşim temelli erken çocuklukta müdahale programı'nın (ETEÇOM) otizm spektrum bozukluğu sergileyen çocukların sosyal etkileşim becerileri üzerindeki etkililiği. Erken Çocukluk Çalışmaları Dergisi, 2(3), 514-555. https://doi.org/10.24130/eccd-jecs.196720182399
79. Shure, M. B. (1999). Preventing violence the problem-solving way (Juvenile Justice Bulletin No. NCJ 172847). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs. https://doi.org/10.1177/014544550325939
80. Shure, M. B. (2000). I can problem solve: Preschool (vol 1). Research Press.
81. Shure, M. B. (2001). I can problem solve (ICPS): An interpersonal cognitive problem solving program for children. Residential Treatment for Children & Youth, 18(3), 3-14. https://doi.org/10.1300/J007v18n03_02
82. Stamper, B. J. (2016). Assessing the effectiveness of the Kimochis program in promoting social and emotional learning in an elementary school setting. New Mexico State University
83. Steiner, D. (2017). Curriculum research: What we know and where we need to go. Washington, D.C.: StandardsWork. https://standardswork.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/03/sw-curriculum-research-report-fnl.pdf
84. Supriyadi. (2021). Developing the participative and collaborative scientific writing materials to develop the students' social and emotional ıntelligence. Technium Social Sciences Journal, 25, 840-846. https://doi.org/10.47577/tssj.v25i1.5082
85. Sutton, A. (2016). Measuring the effects of self-awareness: Construction of the self-awareness outcomes questionnaire. Europe's Journal of Psychology, 12(4), 645. http://dx.doi.org/10.5964/ejop.v12i4.1178
86. Tagay, Ö., Baydan, Y. ve Acar, N. V. (2010). Sosyal beceri programının (blocks) ilköğretim ikinci kademe öğrencilerinin sosyal beceri düzeyleri üzerindeki etkisi. Mehmet Akif Ersoy Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, (3), 19-28. https://doi.org/10.20875/sb.59103
87. Taylor, J., Getty, S., Kowalski, S., Wilson, C., Carlson, J., & Van Scotter, P. (2015). An efficacy trial of research-based curriculum materials with curriculum-based professional development. American Educational Research Journal, 52(5), 984-1017. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831215585962
88. Temel, M., & Şisman, F. N. (2017). İletişim becerileri eğitiminin hemşirelik öğrencilerinin sanal ve kişilerarası ilişkilerine etkisi. Sağlık Bilimleri Ve Meslekleri Dergisi, 4(3), 171-179. https://doi.org/10.17681/hsp.297738
89. The Incredible Years. (IY). (2015). The California Evidence-Based Clearinghouse for child welfare: https://www.cebc4cw.org/program/the-incredible-years/detailed adresinden erişildi.
90. The Incredible Years. (2021). Who we are. https://incredibleyears.com/ adresinden erişildi.
91. Travers, M. (2001). Qualitative research through case studies. Sage Publications.
92. Tuning in to Kids. (2023). https://tuningintokids.org.au/ adresinden erişildi.
93. Türkkent, E. (2023). Bilinçli farkındalık temelli sosyal duygusal öğrenme programının okul öncesi dönem çocuklarının öz düzenleme becerilerine etkisi (Yayımlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi). Anadolu Üniversitesi: Eskişehir.
94. Uşaklı, H. (2017). Sosyal duygusal öğrenme nedir neden önemlidir (insan ilişkilerinde beş duygu alanı). Sinop Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 1(2), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.30561/sinopusd.314566
95. Webster-Stratton, C. (2015). The incredible years series: A developmental approach. In Family-based prevention programs for children and adolescents (s. 54-79). Psychology Press.
96. Webster-Stratton, C. (2016). The incredible years series: A developmental approach. In M. VanRyzin, K. Kumpfer, G. Fosco, & M. Greenburg (Eds.) Family-centered prevention programs for children and adolescents: theory, research, and large-scale dissemination. New York, NY: Psychology Press.
97. Yıldırım, A., & Şimşek, H. (2008). Sosyal bilimlerde nitel araştırma yöntemleri (7. bs.). Seçkin Yayıncılık.
98. Zorlu, H. ve Öğülmüş, S. (2020). The effectiveness of i can problem solve (icps) program: An empirical research on preschoolers. İnönü Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 21(1), 270-283. https://doi.org/10.17679/inuefd.521367
99. Zsolnai, L. (2017). Responsible decision making. Routledge.