Örgütsel İnsandışılaştırma Olgusunun Entelektüel Yapısı ve Evrimi: Web of Science Veri Tabanına Dayalı R Studio Destekli Bibliyometrik Analiz

Öz

Bu çalışma, iş dünyasında çalışanların insani niteliklerinin göz ardı edilip birer araç veya makine olarak algılanması süreci olan "örgütsel insandışılaştırma" olgusunu bibliyometrik analiz tekniği ile sistematik olarak incelemeyi amaçlamaktadır. Araştırmanın temel amacı, 2014-2025 yılları arasında Web of Science (WoS) veri tabanında yayımlanmış bilimsel eserlerin yıllık dağılımını, gelişim seyrini ve entelektüel yapısını ortaya koymaktır. Çalışma kapsamında belirlenen kriterlere uygun 81 akademik yayın, R Studio platformu ve Bibliometrix aracı kullanılarak; atıf ağları, yazar iş birlikleri, kurumsal katkılar ve tematik eğilimler açısından analiz edilmiştir. Bulgular, alanın 2020 yılından itibaren ivme kazandığını ve Belçika, Çin ile İspanya’nın üretimde lider ülkeler olduğunu göstermektedir. Analiz sonuçlarına göre Stinglhamber F. ve Caesens G. en etkili yazarlar olarak öne çıkarken, Catholic University of Louvain kurumsal düzeyde en yüksek katkıyı sağlamıştır. Tematik haritalama sonuçları, "iş tatmini", "duygusal tükenmişlik" ve "istismarcı yönetim" gibi kavramların merkezi rollerini koruduğunu; "psikolojik güvenlik" ve "sosyal dışlanma" gibi konuların ise yükselen temalar olduğunu kanıtlamaktadır. Sonuç olarak çalışma, parçalı bir yapı sergileyen literatürü bütüncül bir çerçevede birleştirerek, konunun gelecekteki araştırmalar için dijitalleşme ve yapay zeka yönetimi ekseninde incelenmesi için bir yol sunmaktadır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Örgütsel İnsandışılaştırma
• Bibliyometrik Analiz
• Web of Science R Studio

The Intellectual Structure and Evolution of Organizational Dehumanization: An RStudio-Supported Bibliometric Analysis Based on the Web of Science Database

Öz

This study aims to systematically examine the phenomenon of "organizational dehumanization"—a process in which employees' human attributes are ignored and they are perceived as mere tools or machines in the business world—using the bibliometric analysis technique. The primary objective of the research is to reveal the annual distribution, developmental trajectory, and intellectual structure of scientific works published in the Web of Science (WoS) database between 2014 and 2025. Within the scope of the study, 81 academic publications meeting the specified criteria were analyzed in terms of citation networks, author collaborations, institutional contributions, and thematic trends using the RStudio platform and the Bibliometrix package. Findings indicate that the field has gained momentum since 2020 and that Belgium, China, and Spain are the leading countries in terms of production. According to the analysis results, Stinglhamber F. and Caesens G. emerge as the most influential authors, while the Catholic University of Louvain provided the highest contribution at the institutional level. Thematic mapping results demonstrate that concepts such as "job satisfaction," "emotional exhaustion," and "abusive supervision" maintain their central roles, while topics like "psychological safety" and "social exclusion" are confirmed as emerging themes. In conclusion, by consolidating the fragmented literature into a holistic framework, this study offers a pathway for examining the subject within the axis of digitalization and artificial intelligence management for future research.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Organizational Dehumanization
• Bibliyometrik Analiz
• Web of Science
• R Studio

Kaynakça

1. ARIA, Massimo ve CUCCURULLO, Corrado (2017), “Bibliometrix: An R-Tool for Comprehensive Science Mapping Analysis”, Journal of Informetrics, S.11(4), ss.959-975, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2017.08.007
2. ARIÑO-MATEO, Eva, ARRIAGADA-VENEGAS, Maite, ALONSO-RODRÍGUEZ, Itahisa ve PÉREZ-JORGE, David (2024), “Your Humanity Depends on Mine: The Role of Organizational Dehumanization in the Context of University Studies”, Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, S.11(1), ss.1-7, https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-024-02880-2
3. BALDISSARRI, Cristina ve FOURIE, Melike M. (2023), “Dehumanizing Organizations: Insidious Effects of Having One’s Human Integrity Denied at Work”, Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, S.49, ss.(101244), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cobeha.2022.101244
4. BELL, Chris M. ve KHOURY, Careen (2011), “Dehumanization, Deindividuation, Anomie and Organizational Justice”, Emerging Perspectives on Organizational Justice and Ethics (Ed. Stephen W. Gilliland, Dirk D. Steiner, Daniel P. Skarlicki), Research in Social Issues in Management, C.7, Information Age Publishing, Greenwich, ss.169-200, https://doi.org/10.1108/978-1-61735-583-720251010
5. BELL, Chris M. ve KHOURY, Careen (2016), “Organizational Powerlessness, Dehumanization, and Gendered Effects of Procedural Justice”, Journal of Managerial Psychology, S.31(2), ss.570-585, https://doi.org/10.1108/JMP-09-2014-0267
6. BRISON, Noémie, KIM, Hak-Yoon, LAGIOS, Constantin ve MURTAZA, Ghulam (2022a), “Organizational Dehumanization: Its Nomological Network and Measurement”, Academy of Management Proceedings, S.2022(1), ss.(16420), https://doi.org/10.5465/AMBPP.2022.16420symposium
7. BRISON, Noémie, STINGLHAMBER, Florence ve CAESENS, Gaëtane (2022b), “Organizational Dehumanization”, Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Psychology, Oxford University Press, Oxford, https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190236557.013.902
8. CAESENS, Gaëtane ve BRISON, Noémie (2023), “The Relationship Between Organizational Dehumanization and Safety Behaviors”, Safety Science, S.158, ss.(105971), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2022.105971

9. CAESENS, Gaëtane ve STINGLHAMBER, Florence (2019), “The Relationship between Organizational Dehumanization and Outcomes: The Mediating Role of Emotional Exhaustion”, Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, S.61(9), ss.699-703, https://doi.org/10.1097/JOM.0000000000001638
10. CAESENS, Gaëtane, NGUYEN, Nhan ve STINGLHAMBER, Florence (2019), “Abusive Supervision and Organizational Dehumanization”, Journal of Business and Psychology, S.34(5), ss.709-728, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-018-9592-3
11. CAESENS, Gaëtane, STINGLHAMBER, Florence, DEMOULIN, Stephanie ve DE WILDE, Matthias (2017), “Perceived Organizational Support and Employees’ Well-Being: The Mediating Role of Organizational Dehumanization”, European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, S.26(4), ss.527-540, https://doi.org/10.1080/1359432X.2017.1319817
12. CALLON, Michel, COURTIAL, Jean-Pierre ve LAVILLE, Frédéric. (1991), “Co-Word Analysis as a Tool for Describing the Network of Interactions Between Basic and Technological Research: The Case of Polymer Chemistry”, Scientometrics, S.22(1), ss.155–205, https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02019280
13. CHRISTOFF, Kalina (2014), “Dehumanization in Organizational Settings: Some Scientific and Ethical Considerations”, Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, S.8, ss.(748), https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2014.00748
14. CIMON, Laurie, GAUTHIER, Myriam ve BEAULIEU, Marianne (2024), “Organizational Dehumanization of Nurses in Healthcare Systems: A Scoping Review”, The Annals of Family Medicine, S.22(Supplement 1), https://doi.org/10.1370/afm.22.s1.6460
15. COBO, Manuel J., LÓPEZ‐HERRERA, Antonio Gabriel, HERRERA‐VIEDMA, Enrique ve HERRERA, Francisco (2012), “SciMAT: A New Science Mapping Analysis Software Tool”, Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, S.63(8), ss.1609–1630, https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.22688
16. DEMOULIN, Stephanie, BRISON, Noémie ve STINGLHAMBER, Florence (2023), “Perceived Sexualization of the Work Environment's Influence on Well‐being, Attitudes, and Behaviors: The Roles of Organizational Dehumanization and Enjoyment of Sexualization”, Journal of Applied Social Psychology, S.53(10), ss.1012-1026, https://doi.org/10.1111/jasp.12992
17. DONTHU, Naveen, KUMAR, Satish, MUKHERJEE, Debmalya, PANDEY, Neeraj ve LIM, Weng Marc (2021), “How to Conduct a Bibliometric Analysis: An Overview and Guidelines”, Journal of Business Research, S.133, ss.285-296, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.04.070
18. EGGHE, Leo (2006), “Theory and Practise of the G-index”, Scientometrics, S.69(1), ss.131–152, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-006-0144-7
19. GIP, Huy, PAŞAMEHMETOĞLU, Aysin ve KHOA, Do The (2023), “How Organizational Dehumanization Impacts Hospitality Employees Service Recovery Performance and Sabotage Behaviors: The Role of Psychological Well-Being and Tenure”, International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, S.35(1), ss.64-91, https://doi.org/10.1108/IJCHM-02-2022-0155
20. HASLAM, Nick (2006), “Dehumanization: An Integrative Review”, Personality and Social Psychology Review, S.10(3), ss.252-264, https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327957pspr1003_4
21. HASLAM, Nick ve LOUGHNAN, Steve (2014), “Dehumanization and Infrahumanization”, Annual Review of Psychology, S.65, ss.399-423, https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-010213-115045
22. HIRSCH, Jorge E. (2005), “An Index to Quantify an Individual’s Scientific Research Output”, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, S.102(46), ss.16569–16572, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0507655102
23. KELMAN, Herbert C. (2017), “Violence Without Moral Restraint: Reflections on the Dehumanization of Victims and Victimizers”, The Criminology of War, Routledge, ss.145-181, https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315086859-8
24. KUMAR, Ritesh (2025), “Bibliometric Analysis: Comprehensive Insights into Tools, Techniques, Applications, and Solutions for Research Excellence”, Spectrum of Engineering and Management Sciences, S.3(1), ss.45-62, https://doi.org/10.31181/sems31202535k
25. LAGIOS, Celine, CAESENS, Gaëtane, NGUYEN, Nhan ve STINGLHAMBER, Florence (2022), “Explaining the Negative Consequences of Organizational Dehumanization: The Mediating Role of Psychological Need Thwarting”, Journal of Personnel Psychology, S.21(2), ss.86-93, https://doi.org/10.1027/1866-5888/a000286
26. LAGIOS, Constantin, STINGLHAMBER, Florence, RESTUBOG, Simon Lloyd D., LAGIOS, Nicolas, BRISON, Noémie ve CAESENS, Gaëtane (2024), “When Organizational Dehumanization Hits Home: Short‐Scale Validation and Test of a Spillover–Crossover Model”, Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, S.97(3), ss.1037-1075, https://doi.org/10.1111/joop.12493
27. MONGEON, Philippe ve PAUL-HUS, Adele (2016), “The Journal Coverage of Web of Science and Scopus: A Comparative Analysis”, Scientometrics, S.106(1), ss.213-228, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-015-1765-5
28. MUHAMMAD, Lakhi ve SARWAR, Aisha (2021), “When and Why Organizational Dehumanization Leads to Deviant Work Behaviors in Hospitality Industry”, International Journal of Hospitality Management, S.99, ss.(103044), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2021.103044
29. OMOTEHINWA, Temidayo Oluwatosin (2022), “Examining the Developments in Scheduling Algorithms Research: A Bibliometric Approach”, Heliyon, S.8(5), ss.(e09510), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e09510
30. ÖZTEMİZ, Handan (2024), “Yalın Lojistik Üzerine Bibliyometrik Bir Analiz: WOS Veri Tabanı (1994-2022)”, Journal of Transportation and Logistics, S.9(1), ss.153-174, https://doi.org/10.26650/JTL.2024.1355860
31. PASSAS, Ioannis (2024), “Bibliyometrik Analiz: Ana Adımlar”, Ansiklopedi, S.4(2), ss.1014-1025, https://doi.org/10.3390/encyclopedia4020065
32. RUBBAB, Ume E., KHATTAK, Sana Aroos, SHAHAB, Hina ve AKHTER, Naveed (2022), “Impact of Organizational Dehumanization on Employee Knowledge Hiding”, Frontiers in Psychology, S.13, ss.(803905), https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.803905
33. SONG, Yao., LIU, Yang ve LI, Shanshan (2025), “Linking Developmental HRM to Organizational Dehumanization Among Nurses: Work Meaningfulness as a Mediator and Mastery Climate as a Moderator”, Journal of Nursing Management, S.2025(1), ss.(8009052), https://doi.org/10.1155/jonm/8009052
34. STAUB, Ervin (1989), The Roots of Evil: The Origins of Genocide and Other Group Violence, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
35. STINGLHAMBER, Florence, NGUYEN, Nhan, OHANA, Marc, LAGIOS, Celine, DEMOULIN, Stephanie ve MAURAGE, Pierre (2023), “For Whom and Why Organizational Dehumanization is Linked to Deviant Behaviours”, Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, S.96(1), ss.203-229, https://doi.org/10.1111/joop.12409
36. VALTORTA, Roberta Rosa, BALDISSARRI, Cristina ve VOLPATO, Chiara (2022), “Burnout and Workplace Dehumanization at the Supermarket: A Field Study During the COVID‐19 Outbreak in Italy”, Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, S.32(4), ss.767-785.
37. VÄYRYNEN, Tiina ve LAARI-SALMELA, Sari (2018), “Men, Mammals, or Machines? Dehumanization Embedded in Organizational Practices”, Journal of Business Ethics, S.147(1), ss.95-113, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-015-2947-z