İlköğretim Matematik Öğretmen Adaylarının Matematik Öğretiminde Somut Materyalleri ve Sanal Öğrenme Nesnelerini Kullanma Yeterlikleri

Öz

Bu çal man n amac ; ilkö retim matematik ö retmen adaylar(manipülatif) kullanma yeterliklerini incelemektir. Arata maktad r. Aramatematik ö retmenli i program na devam eden yetmi bir üçüncü sadaylarölçek ve sanal ö renme nesnelerini kullanma yeterliklerini ölçmek için Bakkalo lu (2007) taraf ndan geli tirilen ölçe in arakullan lm ; ö retmen adaylaryeterlikleri aras ndaki ili kiyi bulmak için ise korelasyon analizi yap lmbulunduruldu unda, ö retmen adaylarS=0.31), sanal ö renme nesnelerini kullanma yeterlikleri ortalamas ndan (x=3.07, S=0.16) yüksek oldu u görülmü tür. Ayr ca, ö retmen adaylarkullanma yeterlikleri aras nda istatistiksel olarak anlaml bir ili ki saptanm

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Somut materyal, sanal ö renme nesneleri, yeterlik inanc

Kaynakça

1. Akbay, M., Akkan, Y., & ÇakÕro÷lu, Ü. (2011). Matematik ö÷retiminde farklÕ manipülatiflerin kullanÕPÕ ile ilgili sÕQÕf ö÷retmenli÷i ö÷retmen adaylarÕQÕn görüúleri. The Proceedings of 11th International Educational Technology Conference, østanbul.
2. Baki, A., & ÖzpÕnar, ø. (2007). Geometri ö÷retiminde logo programinin ö÷rencilerin tutum ve akademik baúarilarina etkileri. The Proceedings of 7th International Educational Technology Conference, Near East University, North Cyprus.
3. Bakkalo÷lu, E. (2007). Preservice elementary mathematics teachers’ efficacy beliefs about using manipulatives in teaching mathematics. YayÕnlanmamÕú yüksek lisans tezi, Orta Do÷u Teknik Üniversitesi, Ankara.
4. Battista, M.T. (2001). Shape makers: A computer environment that engenders students’ construction of geometric ideas and reasoning. Took, J., ve Handerson N. (Eds.) Using Information Technology in Mathematics Education, (105-120). The Haworth Press.
5. Bohan, H. J., & Shqwaker, P.B. (1994). Using manipulatives effectively: A drive down rounding road. Aritmetic Teacher, 41(5), 246-248.
6. Bruner, J.S. (2006). In search of pedagogy: Volume I. New York, NY: Taylor ve Francis Group.
7. Bulut, S. (2004). ølkö÷retim programi yeni yaklaúimlar matematik (1-5. SÕQÕf). Milli E÷itim YayÕnlarÕ, Ankara.
8. Bulut, S., Çömleko÷lu, G., Seçil, S.Ö., YÕldÕUÕm, H., & YÕldÕz, B.T. (2002). Matematik ö÷retiminde somut materyallerin kullanilmasi. V. Ulusal Fen Bilimleri ve Matematik E÷itimi Kongresi, Ankara.

9. Brencht, L.J. (2000). The relative effects of cooperative learning, manipulatives and the combination of cooperative learning and manipulative on fourth graders’ conceptual knowledge, computation knowledge and problem solving skills in multiplication. YayÕnlanmamÕú doktora tezi, Indiana University of Pennsylvania, The Graduate School and Research Department of Professional Studies in Education.
10. Clements, D.H., & McMillen, S. (1996). Rethinking concrete manipulatives. Teaching Children Mathematics, 2(85), 270-279.
11. Çelik, L. (2007). Ö÷retim materyallerinin hazÕrlanmasÕ ve seçimi. Ö. Demirel, (Ed). Ö÷retim Teknolojileri ve Materyal TasarÕPÕ, Ankara: Pegem A YayÕncÕOÕk. Dienes, Z. P., & Golding, E.W. (1971). Approach to modern mathematics. New York: Herder and Herder.
12. Durmuú, S., & KarakÕUÕk, E. (2006). Virtual manipulatives in mathematics education: A theoretical framework. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 5(1), 117-123.
13. Enoch, L. G., & Riggs, I. M. (1990). Further development of an elementary science teaching efficacy belief instrument: A pre-service elementary scale. School Science and Mathematics, 90(8), 694- 706.
14. Ersoy, Y., & Ardahan, H. (2003). ølkö÷retim okullarÕnda kesirlerin ö÷retimi-II: TanÕya yönelik etkinlikler düzenleme. 20 Ekim 2010, http://www.matder.org.tr/index.php?option adresinden alÕnmÕúWÕr.
15. Güven, B., & Karataú, ø. (2005). Dinamik geometri yazÕOÕPÕ cabri ile geometri ö÷renme: ö÷renci görüúleri. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology,2(2), 10-18.
16. HacÕömero÷lu, G., ve ApaydÕn, S. (2009). Tangram etkinli÷i ile çevre ve alan hesabÕ. ølkö÷retim Online 8(2), 1-6.
17. Hannafin, R.D., & Scott, B. N. (1998). Identifying critical learner traits in a dynamic computer based geometry program. Journal of Educational Research, 92(1), 3-12.
18. Heid, M.K. (1997). The technological revolution and the reform of school mathematics. American Journal of Education, 106, 5-61.
19. Hölzl, R., (1996). How does “Dragging” affect the learning of geometry? International Journal of Computers for Mathematical Learning, 1, 169-187.
20. KarakÕUÕk, E. (2008). SAMAP: A Turkish math virtual manipulatives site. 18.10.2010 tarihinde http://www.ietc2008.anadolu.edu.tr/online.php adresinden alÕnmÕúWÕr.
21. Kami, C., & Lewis, B.A. (1990). Constructivism and first grade arithmetics. Arithmetic Teacher, 38 (1), 34-35.
22. Kelly, A.C. (2006). Using manipulatives in mathematical problem solving: A performance-based analysis. The Montana Mathematics Enthuasiast, 3(2), 184-193.
23. .Õ\ÕFÕ, G., Erdo÷muú, E., & Sevinç, Ö.S., (2007). SÕQÕf ortaminda materyal kullaniminin e÷itim-ö÷retime katkisi ile ilgili ö÷retmen adaylarinin görüúleri. The Proceedings of 7th International Educational Technology Conference, Near East University, North Cyprus.
24. Moyer, P.S. (2001). Are we having fun yet? How teachers use manipulatives to teach mathematics. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 47, 175-197.
25. Özdemir, ø. E. (2008). SÕQÕf ö÷retmeni adaylarÕQÕn matematik ö÷retiminde materyal kullanÕPÕna iliúkin biliúsel becerileri. Hacettepe Üniversitesi E÷itim Fakültesi Dergisi, 35, 362-373.
26. Piaget, J. (1971). Biology and knowledge. Chiago: The University of Chicago Pre Ross, R., & Kurtz, R. (1993). Making manipulatives work: A strategy for success. Arithmetic Teacher, 40(5), 254-257.
27. Skemp, R.R. (1987). The psychology of learning mathematics. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
28. Van de Walle, J. A. (2007). Elementary and middle school mathematics: Teaching developmentally (6th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson /Allyn and Bacon.
29. Williams, C.K., & Kamii, C. (1986). How do children learn by handling objects? Young Children, 42(1) 23-46.