-

Öz

Instructional leadership is a leadership which involves all educational activities and leads the institution to success in carrying out these activities by including the teachers as well. The aim of this study is to find out the views of Science and Arts Centers principals about such issues as instructional activities, improvement of learning environments, learning styles of the gifted and talented, and professional development of the teachers. The study was carried out with seven Science and Arts Center principals. The data obtained from open ended question form were analyzed using content analysis technique by identifying themes and sub themes. Findings are compared to another academic’s analysis. Findings show that Science and Arts Center principals constitute organizational aims together with school development and management teams and teachers through meetings in accordance with the aims of Science and Arts Center directive. The principals think that the educational programs at Science and Arts Centers should be adapted to needs of the gifted, be flexible according to their learning pace, and instructional objectives of each center should be identified separately and that students who graduate from these centers should have gained some important attainments.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Science and Arts Centers, instructional practices, instructional leadership.

Bilim sanat merkezi müdürlerinin öğretimsel lider olarak öğretimsel uygulamalr hakkındaki görüşleri

Öz

öğretimsel liderlik, öğretmenleri de yanına alarak kurumu başarıya taşıyan bir liderlik türüdür. bu çalışmanın amacı bilim sanat merkezlerindeki öğretimsel faaliyetlerin üstün zekalı ve yetenekli öğrencilerin öğrenme stratejileri, öğrenme ortamlarının iyileştirilmesi, öğretmenlerin profesyonel gelişiminin desteklenmesi gibi konularda merkez müdürlerinin görüşlerini ortaya çıkarmaktır. araştırma nitel araştırma desenlerinden içerik analizi tekniği ile analiz edilmiştir ve araştırmaya 7 bilim sanat emrkezi müdürü dahil edilmiştir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Bilim ve Sanat Merkezleri, öğretimsel uygulamalar, öğretimsel lider

Kaynakça

1. Austin, G.R.(1978). Exemplary Schools and he Search for Effectiveness. Educational Leadership, 10Bolman, L. G., & Deal, T. E. (2008). Reframing Organizations: Artistry, choice and leadership. CA: Jossey-Bass.
2. Çelik, V., (2000), Eğitimsel Liderlik, Ankara: Pegem Yayıncılık
3. Can, N., (2007), İlköğretim okulu yöneticisinin bir öğretimsel lider olarak yeni öğretim programlarının geliştirilmesi ve uygulanmasındaki yeterliği, 3(2):228-244 Eğitimde Kuram ve Uygulama Journal of Theory and Practice in Education Makaleler/Articles
4. Cortina, L. (2011) School administrators and the Professional learning of general education teachers related to gifted education, a delphi study, Dissertation http://domapp01.shu.edu/depts/uc/apps/libraryrepository.nsf/resourceid/F1EC4F2578B0F3B48 525787700499C37/$File/Cortina-Lenore_Doctorate.pdf?Open adresinden 12.09.2012 tarihinde erişilmiştir.
5. Dowies, T. (1989, Dec.). The influence of myths and other factors on the attitudes of Texas principals toward mandated gifted and talented programs. http://proquest.umi.com/pqdweb?did=746072681&sid=15&Fmt=2&clientId=2945&RQT=309 &VName=PQD adresinden 22.09.2012 tarihinde erişilmiştir.
6. Erdoğan, İ., (2000) Okul Yönetimi ve Öğretim Liderliği, İstanbul
7. Hannaway, J. ve Talbert, J.E.(1993). Bringing Context Into Effective Schools Reseacrh: Urban Suburban Differences, Educational Administration Quarterly, 29(2), 164-186.
8. Kelley, C; ve Peterson, K. (2000). The Work Of Principals And Their Prepartion: Addressing Critical Needs For The 2/St Century. National Center On Education And The Economy.

9. Korkmaz, M. (2005), Okul Yöneticilerinin Yetiştirilmesi: Sorunlar – Çözümler ve Öneriler Gazi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt 25, Sayı 3 (2005) 237-252
10. Lashway, L.(1995) Can Instructional Leaders Be Facilitative Leaders? http://www.ericdigests.org/1996-1/leaders.htm adresinden 10.01.2012 tarihinde edinilmiştir. Long,C.L.F., Mississippi State (2008). http://www.acteonline.org/uploadedFiles/About_CTE/files/Instructional%20leadership%20Perc eptions%20of%20MS%20CTE%20administrators.pdf adresinden 02012 tarihinde edinilmiştir.
11. Maguire, K. G. (2008). Gifted education: In-class differentiation and acceleration in Pennsylvania schools. (Doctoral dissertation, Columbia University: New York). 12.04.2012 tarihinde Proquest tez veri tabanından edinilmiştir (UMI No. 3348582).
12. MEB (2001). Bilim ve Sanat Merkezleri Yönergesi
13. The National Association of Elementary School Principals (2001). Leading learning communities: Standards for what principals should know and be able to do. www.naesp.org//llc.pdf adresinden 15.04.2012 tarihinde erişilmiştir.
14. Metin, N. (1999). Üstün Yetenekli Çocuklar. Öz Aşama Yayınları; Ankara.
15. Nguyen, T. M. P. (2011). Gifted education in Vietnam throughout history. Talent Development Around the World. http://worldtalent.ruseleon.com/Pdfs%20fabiola/Vietnam.pdf adresinden 02012 tarihinde edinilmiştir.
16. O’Neill, K.; Fry, B.; Hill, D. ve Bottoms, G. (2003). Good Principals Are The Key To Sccessful Schools : Six Strategies To Prepare More Good Principals. Atlanta: Southern Regional Education Board.
17. Queensland framework of gifted education policy (2012) http://education.qld. gov.au/publication/production/reports/pdfs/giftedandtalfwrk.pdf adresinden 02012 tarihinde erişilmiştir.
18. Smutny, J.,F. ve Lind, C. (2002). From Needs and Goals to Program Organization http://www.sagepub.com/upm-data/7202_smutny_ch_1.pdf adresinden 22.05.2012 tarihinde edinilmiştir.
19. Ş işman,M. (2002). Öğretim Liderliği, Ankara: PegemA Yayıncılık.
20. Sweeney, J.(1982). Research Synthesis on Effective School Leadership, Educational Leadership, 39(5), 346-352
21. Tebligler Dergisi. (2007). Bilim ve Sanat Merkezi (BiLSEM) Yönergesi. Sayı:2593, Madde 21.
22. Van Tassel-Baska, J. (2008) (Ed.). Alternative Assessments with Gifted and Talented Students. Waco, TX: Prufrock Press Inc
23. Yıldırım, A. ve Şimşek, H. (2005). Sosyal Bilimlerde Nitel Araştırma Yöntemleri. Ankara: Sistem Yayıncılık
24. Yıldırım, A. ve Şimşek, H. (2008). Sosyal bilimlerde nitel araştırma yöntemleri. Ankara: Seçkin Yayıncılık
25. Wisconsin framework of gifted education policy http://education.qld.gov.au/publication/production/reports/pdfs/giftedandtalfwrk.pdf adresinden 20/07/2012 tarihinde edinilmiştir.
26. Whitaker, B. (1997). Instructional leadership and principal visibility. Clearing House, 70 (3), 1551