Yükseköğretimde Öğretme ve Öğrenme Merkezlerinin Eğitim Süreçlerinin Kalitesinin Geliştirilmesindeki Dönüştürücü Etkisi: “İngiltere Örneği”

Öz

Dünyadaki bilimsel, toplumsal ve ekonomik değişim ve dönüşümler, yükseköğretim kurumlarının eğitim-öğretim, araştırma ve topluma hizmet alanlarındaki uygulamalarını etkilemektedir. Bu uygulamaların gerçekleştirilmesine yönelik üniversitelerde çeşitli akademik birimler bulunmaktadır. Bu birimlerden biri yükseköğretim kurumlarında eğitim-öğretim hizmetlerinin nitelikli olarak yürütülmesi amacıyla kurulan öğretme ve öğrenme merkezleridir. Bu merkezlerde, öğretim elemanlarına yönelik mesleki ve profesyonel gelişim fırsatları sunma, öğrencilere yönelik akademik ve kişisel gelişime katkıda bulunma gibi birçok faaliyet yürütülmektedir. Bu makalede, İngiltere'deki Oxford, Manchester, Edge Hill ve Leeds Üniversitelerindeki Öğretme ve Öğrenme Merkezleri tarafından uygulanan öğretim elemanlarına yönelik mesleki gelişim programları analiz edilmiştir. Bu araştırma betimsel ve karşılaştırmalı eğitim araştırma modellerini kullanan nitel bir çalışmadır. Araştırmanın yöntemi doküman incelemesidir. Veri kaynakları öğretme-öğrenme merkezlerinin resmî web sitelerindeki bilgi ve belgelerdir. Verilerin analizinde doküman analizi tekniği kullanılmıştır. Araştırma bulgularından bazıları şunlardır: Oxford Üniversitesi Öğretme ve Öğrenme Merkezi deneyimli öğretim elemanları için yedi program uygularken, Edge Hill dört, Manchester üç ve Leeds üç program uygulamaktadır. Tüm programların ortak amacı, öğretim elemanlarının gereksinimleri doğrultusunda akademik ve öğretim becerilerini geliştirmektir. Ayrıca, bu merkezler teknoloji destekli eğitimler ve küresel dijital kaynaklara erişim yoluyla üniversitelerin uluslararasılaşmasını sağlamayı amaçlamışlardır. İngiltere'deki öğretme ve öğrenme merkezleri kalite güvencesi ve kurumsal dönüşümün ayrılmaz bir parçasıdır. Bu programlar, bireysel öğretim danışmanlığından üniversite çapında stratejik programlara kadar, eğitim politikalarını doğrudan şekillendirmekte, değerlendirme yapmakta, sonuçları sistematik olarak izleyerek kaliteyi sürdürülebilir kılmaktadır. İngiltere ve Türkiye’deki merkezler arasındaki iş birliğinin sürdürülebilirliğinin her iki ülke açısından faydalı olması beklenmektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Yükseköğretim
• öğretme ve öğrenme merkezleri
• İngiltere yükseköğretim sistemi
• yükseköğretimde kalite

Destekleyen Kurum

Destekleyen kurum bulunmamaktadır.

Etik Beyan

Araştırma, erişime açık web sitelerinden elde edilen dokümanların analizine dayalı bir nitel araştırma olduğu ve denekler üzerinde çalışılmadığı için Etik Kurul Onay Belgesi gerekmemektedir.

The Transformative Impact of Teaching and Learning Centers on Enhancing the Quality of Teaching and Learning Processes in Higher Education: “The Case of the UK”

Öz

Scientific, social, and economic changes worldwide affect the practices of higher education institutions in education, research, and community service. Various academic units exist within universities to implement these practices. One such unit is the teaching and learning centers established in higher education institutions to ensure the quality of education and teaching services. These centers offer many activities, including professional development opportunities for faculty and support for students' academic and personal development. This article analyzes the professional development programs for faculty implemented by the Teaching and Learning Centers at Oxford, Manchester, Edge Hill, and Leeds Universities in the UK. It is a qualitative study using descriptive and comparative educational research models. The data sources are data and documents from the official websites of the teaching and learning centers. A document analysis technique was used to analyze the data. Some of the research findings are as follows: Oxford University's Teaching and Learning Center implements seven programs for experienced faculty, Edge Hill implements four, Manchester implements three, and Leeds implements three. The common goal of all programs is to develop faculty's academic and teaching skills in line with their needs. They also aim to ensure the internationalization of universities through technology-supported education and access to global digital resources. Teaching and learning centers in the UK are integral to quality assurance and institutional transformation. These programs shape educational policies, ranging from individual teaching consultations to institution-wide strategic initiatives, while conducting evaluations and systematically monitoring outcomes to ensure the sustainability of the quality of teaching and learning processes. Sustainable cooperation between centers in the UK and Türkiye is expected to benefit both countries.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Higher education
• teaching and learning centers
• UK in higher education
• quality in higher education

Destekleyen Kurum

There is no supporting organization.

Etik Beyan

Since this research is a qualitative study based on the analysis of documents obtained from publicly accessible websites and does not involve subjects, an Ethics Committee Approval Certificate is not required.

Kaynakça

1. AdvanceHE (2023). Professional Standards Framework for teaching and supporting learning in higher education [PSF]. https://www.advance-he.ac.uk/teaching-and-learning/psf
2. Akınlar, A., & Kavgaoğlu, D. (2024). Sarmaşık Ligi Üniversitelerinin Öğretme ve Öğrenme Merkezlerinin Kaliteli Yükseköğretime Katkıları Açısından İncelenmesi. Yaşadıkça Eğitim, 38(3), 610–625. https://doi.org/10.33308/26674874.2024383781
3. Ambrosino, R., & Peel, J. (2011). Faculty development programs: Assessing the impact on instructional practices, and student learning and motivation. The Journal of Faculty Development, 25(2), 33-38. http://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ975185
4. Asimakopoulos, G., Karalis, T., & Kedraka, K. (2021). The role of centers of teaching and learning in supporting higher education students learning. Journal of Higher Education Theory and Practice, 21(13). https://doi.org/10.33423/jhetp.v21i13.4789
5. Atherton, G., Lewis, J., & Bolton, P. (2024). Higher education in the UK: Systems, policy approaches, and challenges. [Report No: 9640]. House of Commons Library.
6. Atik, G., & Yalçın, İ., (2010). Counseling needs of educational sciences students at the Ankara University. 2nd World Conference on Educational Sciences (WCES-2010) (pp.1520-1526). İstanbul, Turkey
7. Beerkens, M. (2016). Quality assurance and global context: Responding to diverse demands. Paper presented at the International Network for Quality Assurance Agencies in Higher Education (INQAAHE) Biennial Forum 2016, Natadola, Fiji.
8. Blackmore, P., & Blackwell, R. (2006). Strategic leadership in academic development. Studies in Higher Education, 31(3), 373-387. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070600680893

9. Bose, D., & Nyland, R. (2021). Are faculty prepared to teach flexibly? Results from an evaluation study. Journal on Centers for Teaching and Learning, 13, 60-91.
10. Bray, M., Adamson, B., & Mason, M. (Eds.). (2014). Comparative education research: Approaches and methods (19). Springer.
11. Brew, A. (2007). Evaluating academic development in a time of perplexity. International Journal for Academic Development, 12(2), 69–72.
12. Brooker, A., Brooker, S., & Lawrence, J. (2017). First year students’ perceptions of their difficulties. Student Success, 8(1), 49-62. https://doi.org/10.5204/ssj.v8i1.352
13. Bulut, M. A., Göçen, A., & Konuk, H. (2023). “Yükseköğretim Kurumlarında Öğrenme ve Öğretme Merkezleri [Learning and Teaching Centers in Higher Education Institutions].” EPAM Politika Notları.
14. Capriotti, V. & Locatelli, A. (2024). Impacts and Challenges of Teaching and Learning Centers: A first overview. CQIA Rivista, 14(1), 1-5.
15. Center for Teaching and Learning (CTL). (n.d.). https://www.ctl.ox.ac.uk
16. Center for Learning and Teaching (CLT). (n.d.) https://www.edgehill.ac.uk/departments/support/clt/
17. Challis, D., Holt D. & Palmer S. (2009) Teaching and learning centres: Towards maturation. Higher Education Research & Development, 28(4), 371-383. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360903067021
18. Chalmers, D. (2007). A review of Australian and international quality systems and indicators of learning and teaching. Carrick Institute, Canberra.
19. Chalmers, D., & O'Brien, M. (2005). Education development units and the enhancement of university teaching. In K. Fraser (Ed.), Education development and leadership in higher education (pp. 50-71). Falmer Press.
20. Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2021). Research methods in education. Londra: Routledge Falmer.
21. Çolak Sancı, E. (2021). Amerika, Avrupa, Asya-Pasifik ve Türk üniversitelerinde bulunan öğrenme öğretme merkezlerinin incelenmesi, değerlendirilmesi ve karşılaştırılması (Tez No: 663836). [Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Gazi Üniversitesi].
22. Cook, C. E., & Kaplan, M. (Eds.). (2011). Advancing the culture of teaching on campus: How a teaching center can make a difference. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003442943
23. Cooke, R., Bewick, M. B., Barkham, M., Bradley, M., & Audin, A. (2006). Measuring, Monitoring and Managing the Psychological Well-Being of First Year University Students. British Journal of Guidance & Counselling, 34, 505-517. https://doi.org/10.1080/03069880600942624
24. Creswell, J. W. (2020). Eğitim araştırmaları: Nicel ve nitel araştırmanın planlanması, yürütülmesi ve değerlendirilmesi. EDAM.
25. Dagdag, J., Cuizon, H., & Liban, A. (2019). College students' problems and their link to academic performance: Basis for needs- driven student programs. Journal of Research, Policy & Practice of Teachers & Teacher Education. 9, 54-65. https://doi.org/10.37134/jrpptte.vol9.no2.5.2019
26. Dyer, A., Selby, D., & Chalkley, B. (2006). A centre for excellence in education for sustainable development. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 30(2), 307-312.
27. Elçi, A., & İşeri, E. (2022). Türkiye’de Öğretim Elemanı Mesleki Gelişimi için Öğrenme ve Öğretme Merkezleri: Yönetim ve Örgüt Yapısı. Yükseköğretim Dergisi, 12(2), 280-295. https://doi.org/10.2399/yod.21.734565
28. European Association for Quality Assurance in Higher Education [ENQA]. (2015). Brussels, Belgium.
29. European Commission/EACEA/Eurydice. (2022). Towards equity and inclusion in higher education in Europe. Eurydice report. Luxembourg: The Office of the European. https://eurydice.eacea.ec.europa.eu/publications/towards-equity-and-inclusion-higher-education-europe
30. European Higher Education Area (ESG). (2015). Standards and guidelines for quality assurance in the European Higher Education Area (ESG). (2015). Brussels, Belgium.
31. Forgie, S. E., Yonge, O., & Luth, R. (2018). Centres for teaching and learning across Canada: What's going on?. Canadian Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 9(1), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.5206/cjsotl-rcacea.2018.1.9
32. Freeman, S., Eddy, S. L., McDonough, M., Smith, M. K., Okoroafor, N., Jordt, H., & Wenderoth, M. P. (2014). Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics. Proceedings of the national academy of sciences, 111(23), 8410-8415. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1319030111
33. Fry, H., Ketteridge, S., & Marshall, S. (2009). A handbook for teaching and learning in higher education: Enhancing academic practice. http://lst-iiep.iiep-unesco.org/cgi-bin/wwwi32.exe/[in=epidoc1.in]/?t2000=024772/(100)
34. Giertz, B., (2000). The quality concept in higher education. The TQM for Higher Education Institutions II, Verona, Italy, 30–31 August.
35. Giovazolias, T., Leontopoulou, S., & Triliva, S. (2010). Assessment of Greek University students’ counseling needs and attitudes: An exploratory study. Int J Adv Counseling, 32, 101–116. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10447-010-9092-2
36. Griffin, P., McGaw, B., & Care, E. (2012). The Changing role of education and schools. In P. Griffin, B. McGaw, & E. Care (Eds.), Assessment and Teaching of 21st Century Skills (1-16). Dordrecht, Germany: Springer Science+Business Media B.V. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-2324-5_2
37. Harvey, L., & Green, D. (1993). Defining quality. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 18(1), 9-34. https://doi.org/10.1080/0260293930180102
38. Hassanbeigi, A., Askari, J., Nakhjavani, M., Shirkhoda, S., Barzegar, K., & Mozayyan, M., & Fallahzadeh, H., (2011). The relationship between study skills and academic performance of university students. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences. 30, 1416-1424. 10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.10.276.
39. Hayırsever, F., Kalaycı, N., & Gel, N. (2024). Üniversitelerin eğitim öğretim hizmetlerinin kalitesini etkileyen öğrenme ve öğretme merkezleri: İngiltere örneği. 7. Uluslararası Yükseköğretim Çalışmaları Konferansı, Ankara, Türkiye (17-19 Ekim, 2024).
40. Hattie, J. (2015). The applicability of visible learning to higher education. Scholarship of Teaching and Learning in Psychology, 1(1), 79–91. https://doi.org/10.1037/stl0000021
41. Henard, F., & Roseveare, D. (2012). Fostering quality teaching in higher education: Policies and practices. Institutional Management in Higher Education (IMHE). OECD.
42. Institute of Teaching and Learning (ITL). (n.d.). https://www.staffnet.manchester.ac.uk/umitl/
43. Institute for Teaching Excellence (LITE). (n.d.).https://teachingexcellence.leeds.ac.uk/
44. İlhan E., Kalaycı, N., & Hayırsever, F. (2018). Üniversitelerin eğitim görevinin kalitesini artırma aracı olarak program değerlendirme süreci. International Conference on Quality in Higher Education, İstanbul. Türkiye. (5-7 Aralık 2018).
45. Kalaycı, N. (2008). Yükseköğretim toplam kalite yönetimi uygulamalarında gözardı unsurlardan “TKY Merkezi” ve “Eğitim programları”. Türk Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi. 6(2), 163-188.
46. Klemenčič, M., Pupinis, M., & Kirdulytė, G. (2020). Mapping and analysis of student-centred learning and teaching practices: Usable knowledge to support more inclusive, high-quality higher education. NESET report, Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union. https://doi.org/10.2766/67668
47. Kloos, D. C., Alario-Hoyos, C., Morales, M., Rocael, H. R., Jerez, O., Perez-Sanagustín, M., Kotorov, I., Fernández, S. A. R., Oliva-Córdova, L. M., & Solarte, M. (2021). "PROF-XXI: Teaching and Learning Centers to Support the 21st Century Professor," 2021 World Engineering Education Forum/Global Engineering Deans Council (WEEF-GEDC), Madrid, Spain, Nov. 15–18, 2021, IEEE: Piscataway, NJ, USA, 2021, 448–455.
48. Krumrei-Mancuso, E.J., Newton, F.B., Kim, E., & Wilcox, D. (2013). Psychosocial factors predicting first-year college student success. Journal of College Student Development 54(3), 247-266. https://dx.doi.org/10.1353/csd.2013.0034
49. Muammar, O.M. & Alkathiri, M.S. (2021). What really matters to faculty members attending professional development programs in higher education. International Journal for Academic Development, 27(2), 1–13. https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1360144X.2021.1897987
50. Lotti, A., Serbati, A., Doria, B., Picasso, F., & Felisatti, E. (2022). Teaching and learning centre: Analysis of key elements. Formazione & Insegnamento, 20(2), 75–88. https://doi.org/10.7346/-fei-XX-02-22_06
51. O’Grady, M. (2017, August 14). The story of America’s first center for teaching and learning. Top Hat. https://tophat.com/blog/ctls-history-michigan
52. Palmer, S., Holt, D., & Challis, D. (2011). Strategic leadership of teaching and learning centres from reality to ideal. Higher Education Research & Development, 30(6), 807–821. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2010.539600
53. Palmer, S., Holt, D., & Challis, D. (2010). Australian teaching and learning centres through the eyes of their directors: Characteristics, capacities and constraints. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 32(2), 159-172.
54. Perez- Sanagustín, A. M., McShannon, J., & Hynes, P. (2012). Community college faculty development program and student achievement. Community College Journal of Research and Practice, 36(5), 379-385. https://doi.org/10.1080/10668920902813469
55. Price, J., & Cotten, S.R. (2006). Teaching, research, and service: Expectations of assistant professors. The American Sociologis, 37, 5–21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12108-006-1011-y.
56. Raikou, N., & Karalis, T. (2011). Exploring the potential of transformative learning in higher education: The development of students’ critical thinking through aesthetic experience. Paper presented 9th International Transformative Learning Conference in Europe 2011.
57. Russel Group (2025). Who we are? https://www.russellgroup.ac.uk/who-we-are.
58. Saucier, D. A., Jones, T. L., Renken, N. D., & Schiffer, A. A. (2021). Engage the sages: A model for offering professional development to faculty and graduate students in teaching. Journal on Centers for Teaching and Learning, 13, 3-16.
59. Schneider, M., & Preckel, F. (2017). Variables associated with achievement in higher education: A systematic review of meta-analyses. Psychological bulletin, 143(6), 565-600. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000098
60. Stelnicki, A. M., Nordstokke, D. W., & Saklofske, D. H. (2015). Who is the successful university student? An analysis of personal resources. Canadian Journal of Higher Education, 45(2), 214–228. https://doi.org/10.47678/cjhe.v45i2.184491
61. Stellenbosch University. (n.d.). Auxin: Teaching and learning conversation series. https://www.sun.ac.za/english/learning-teaching/ctl/seminars-and-conferences/auxin
62. Sweet, C., Blythe, H., Carpenter, R., & Cecil, T. (2018). Approaching the Holy Grail of faculty development: Evolving a CTL from a service-oriented organization to a learning-assessment unit. Journal on Centers for Teaching and Learning, 10, 45-58.
63. Şenol, Y., Akyüz, G., Apaydın, Ç., & Başaran, S. (2022). Eğitimde Mükemmellik Merkezi Hizmetlerinin Logic Modelle Değerlendirilmesi. Yükseköğretim ve Bilim Dergisi, 12(1), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.5961/higheredusci.908005
64. Şenol, Y., Şekercioğlu, G., Gürpınar, E., Turhan, M. & Özkan, Ö., (2023). Yükseköğretimde uygulanan eğitim becerilerini geliştirme kursunun bağlam girdi süreç ve çıktı yöntemi ile değerlendirilmesi. Organizasyon ve Yönetim Bilimleri Dergisi, 15(2),78-90.
65. Tanga, M., & Maphosa, C. (2017). Exploring the recruitment and training of peer facilitators in a South African University. International Journal of Educational Development. 61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2017.08.005
66. Taylor, K.L. (2005). Academic development as institutional leadership: An interplay of person, role, strategy and institution. International Journal for Academic Development, 10(1), 31–46. https://doi.org/10.1080/13601440500099985
67. Tekkol, İ., & Demirel, M. (2018). An investigation of self-directed learning skills of undergraduate students. Frontiers in Psychology, 9(2324), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02324
68. Trigwell, K., Rodriguez, K. C., & Han, F. (2012). Assessing the impact of a university teaching development programme. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 37(4), 499–511. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2010.54 7929
69. Weimer, M. (2007). Intriguing connections but not with the past. International Journal for Academic Development, 12(1), 5–8. https://doi.org/10.1080/13601440701217204
70. Wright, M. C. (2019). How many centers for teaching and learning are there? POD Network News, 1-2.
71. Wright, M.C. (2023). Centers for Teaching and Learning: The New Landscape in Higher Education. Johns Hopkins University Press.
72. Wright, M. C., Lohe, D. R., & Little, D. (2018). The role of a center for teaching and learning in a de-centered educational world. Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning, 50(6), 38-44. https://doi.org/10.1080/00091383.2018.1540826
73. Yükseköğretim Bilgi Yönetim Sistemi. [YÖK]. (2022). Yükseköğretim istatistikleri. https://istatistik.yok.gov.tr/
74. Yükseköğretim Kalite Kurulu [YÖKAK]. (2024). Uluslararası Kurumsal Akreditasyon Programı (UKAP) Değerlendirme Ölçütleri. Ankara.