Derleme
BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

DİL ÖĞRENME STRATEJİLERİNİN KULLANILMASINI ETKİLEYEN FAKTÖRLER

Yıl 2020, Cilt: 2 Sayı: 1, 91 - 103, 23.06.2020

Öz

Yabancı dil öğrenme sürecinde yer alan öğrencilerin bu dili öğrenmelerini ve başarmalarını etkileyen unsurlar eğitimciler tarafından önemli bir konu olarak görülmektedir. Yabancı dil akademik başarısı yüksek olan ve dili işlevsel olarak kullanan öğrencilerin nasıl başarılı oldukları ve dili aktif olarak kullandıkları ile akademik başarısı düşük olan öğrencilerin başarısızlık nedenlerine ilişkin merak artmakta ve önemli bir konu olarak görülmektedir. Bu noktada başarılı olan öğrencilerin kendilerine özgü takip ettikleri yollar ve başarılarını etkileyen unsurlar göz ardı edilmemelidir. Öğrencilerin dil akademik başarılarını etkileyen faktörlerin başında dil öğrenme stratejileri gelmektedir. Dil öğrenme sürecinde yer alan öğrenciler bilinçli ya da bilinçsiz bir şekilde bu stratejileri tercih etmekte, farklı durumlarda kullanmakta ve farklı öğrenme görevlerine transfer etmektedirler. Ancak dil öğrenme stratejileri kişiye özgüdür. Başka bir ifade ile öğrenenlerin dil öğrenme sürecinde kullandıkları stratejiler kişiden kişiye değişmektedir. Dolayısıyla öğrenenlerin tercih ettikleri dil öğrenme stratejileri kendilerinin sahip oldukları çeşitli unsurlardan etkilenmektedir. Bu bağlamda bu çalışmada bireylerin dil öğrenme stratejilerini etkileyen unsurların geniş bir çeşitlilikte ele alınması amaçlanmaktadır.

Kaynakça

  • Albert, R., & Habo, R. N. (1960). Anxiety in academic achievement situations. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 10, 207-215.
  • Alshenqeeti, H. (2018). Technology in the language classroom: how social media is changing the way EFL is taught. Arab World English Journal (AWEJ) Special Issue on CALL, 4, 1-14.
  • Aslan, O. (2009). The role of gender and language learning strategies in learning English. Yayımlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Ortadoğu Teknik Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Ankara.
  • Bacon, S. M. (1992). The relationship between gender, comprehension, processing strategies, cognitive, and affective response in foreign language listening. The Modern Language Journal 76, 160-178.
  • Bardwick, J. (1972). Psychology of women: a study of biocultural conflicts. New York: Harper & Row, 72(9), 1726-1727.
  • Bialystock, E., & Frohlich, M. (1978). Variables of classroom achievement in second language learning. Modern Language Journal, 62(7), 327-335.
  • Bialystok, E. (1981). The Role of conscious strategies in second language proficiency. Modern Language Journal, 65(1), 24-35.
  • Blake, J. (1989). Family size and achievement. Berkeley, California: University of California Press.
  • Bruen, J. (2001). Strategies for success: Profiling the effective learner of German. Foreign Langue Annals, 34(3), 216-25.
  • Chamot, A. U. (2004). Issues in language learning strategy research and teaching. Electronic Journal of Foreign Language Teaching 1(1), 14-26.
  • Chamot, A.U., & Keatley, C. W. (2004). Learning strategies of students of less commonly taught languages. Paper presented at the 2004 Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Diego, CA.
  • Chamot, A. U., & Kupper, L. (1989). Learning strategies in foreign language instruction. Foreign Language Annals, 22, 13-24.
  • Chang, C., & Shen, M. (2005). The effects of beliefs about language learning and learning strategy use of junior high school EFL learners in remote districts. Research in Higher Education Journal. www.aabri.com/manuscripts/10462.pdf
  • Chang, H. H. (2005). The relationship between extrinsic/intrinsic motivation and language learning strategies among college students of English in Taiwan. Master’s thesis, Ming Chuan University, Taiwan
  • Cohen, A. D. (1998). Strategies in learning and using a second language. Harlow, Essex: Longman.
  • Dornyei, Z. (2001). Attitudes, orientations, and motivations in language learning. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
  • Duffy, G. (1982). Fighting off the alligators: What research in real classrooms has to say about reading instruction. Journal of Reading Behavior, 14, 357-374.
  • Ehrman, M., & Oxford, R., 1989: Effects of sex differences, career choice, and psychological typeonadults’languagelearning strategies. Modern Language Journal, 73(1), 1-13.
  • Franken, R. E. (1982). Human Motivation. Monterey. CA: Brooks and Cole Publishing Co.
  • Gardner, R. C. (1979). Social psychological aspects of second language acquisition. In H. Giles, & R. S. Clair (Eds.), Language and social psychology (pp. 193-220). Basil: Blackwell.
  • Gardner, R. C. (1985). Social psychological and second language learning: The role of attitude and motivation. Baltimore, MD: Edward Arnold.
  • Gardner, R. C., & Lambert, W. E. (1972). Attitude and motivation in second language learning. Rowley, MA: Newbury House Publishers.
  • Gharbavi, A., & Mousavi, S. A. (2012). Do language proficiency levels correspond to language learning strategy adoption?. English Language Teaching, 5(7), 110-122.
  • Goh, C., & Kwah, P.F. (1997). Chinese ESL students‟ learning strategies: A look at frequency, proficiency, and gender. Hong Kong Journal of Applied Linguistics, 2, 39-53.
  • Grainger, P. (1997). Language-learning strategies for learners of Japanese: Investigating ethnicity. Foreign Language Annals, 30, 378–385.
  • Green, J., & Oxford, R. L. (1995). A closer look at learning strategies, L2 proficiency, and gender. TESOL Quarterly, 29, 261-297.
  • Griffiths, C. (1991). Personality and second-language learning: theory, research, and practice. http://www.eric.ed.gov/PDFS/ED367167.pdf adresinden 08.01.2020 tarihinde erişilmiştir.
  • Griffiths, C. (2003). Patterns of language learning strategy use. System, 31, 367-383
  • Griffiths, C. (2013). The strategy factor in successful language learning. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
  • Gu, P. Y. (2002). Vocabulary Learning in a Second Language: Person, Task, Context and Strategies. TESL-EJ, 7(2), 1-25.
  • Hong-Nam, K., & Leavell, A. G. (2006). Language learning strategy use of ESL students in an intensive English learning context. System 34, 399-415.
  • Horwitz, E. K., & Young, D. J. (1991). Language anxiety: from theory and research to classroom implications. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
  • Horwitz, E. K. (1985). Using student beliefs about language learning and teaching in the foreign language methods course. Foreign Language Annals, 18(4), 333-340.
  • Horwitz, E. K. (1987). Surveying student beliefs about language learning. In A. Wenden & J. Rubin (Eds.), Learning strategies in language learning. Englewood Cliffs NY: Prentice Hall.
  • Horwitz, E. K., Horwitz, M. B., & Cope, J. A. (1986). Foreign language classroom anxiety. The Modern Language Journal, 70(2), 125-132
  • Hou, Y. A. (2015). The relationship of multiple intelligences, foreign language learning anxiety and English proficiency-a case study of Taiwanese EFL college students. The International Journal of the Communication and Linguistic Studies, 12, 15-29.
  • Liu, P. C. (1973). A study of the relationships between the native chinese speakers’ spoken English proficiency and his attitude, motivation and background in learning English. Unpublished Ph.D. Dissertation, Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University.
  • Macaro, E. (2006). Strategies for language learning and for language use: revising the theoretical framework. The Modern Language Journal, 90(3), 320-337.
  • Mochizuki, A. (1999). Language learning strategies used by Japanese university students. RELC, 30(2), 101–113.
  • Nel, C. (2008) Learning style and good language learners. In C. Griffiths (ed.), Lessons from good language learners. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 49-60.
  • Nelson, G. L. (1995). Cultural differences in learning styles. In J. M. Reid (Ed.), Learning styles in the ESL/EFL classroom (pp. 3-18). New York: Heinle & Heinle Publishers.
  • Nikoopour, J., Salimian, S., Salimian, S., & Farsani, M. A. (2012). Motivation and the choice of language learning strategies. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 3(6), 1277–1283.
  • Nyikos, M., & Oxford, R. L. (1993). A factor-analytic study of language learning strategy use: Interpretations from information processing theory and social psychology. Modern Language Journal, 77(1), 11-23.
  • Nyikos, M. (1990). Sex-related differences in adult language learning: Socialization and memory factors. Modern Language Journal, 74(3).
  • O’Malley, J. M., & Chamot, A. U. (1990). Learner strategies in second language acquisition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Chamot, A. (2005). Language learning strategy instruction: Current issues and research. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 25, 112-130.
  • Opper, S., Teichler, U., & Carlson, J. (1990). Impact of study abroad programmes on students and graduates. London: Jessica Kingsley.
  • Oxford, R. L. (1989). Use of language learning strategies: A synthesis of studies with implications for strategy training. System, 17, 235-247.
  • Oxford, R. L. (1994).Language learning strategies: UN updates ERIC Digest, ERIC Digest .ERIC clearinghouse and linguistic Washington DC. http://www.vmcsatellite.com/aid,51733 adresinden 11.01.2020 tarihinde erişilmiştir.
  • Oxford, R. (2011). Teaching and researching language learning strategies. Harlow: Pearson Longman.
  • Oxford R. L. (2017). Teaching and researching language learning strategies: self-regulation in context. Routledge: New York.
  • Oxford, R. L., & Burry-stock, J. A. (1995). Assessing the use of language learning strategies worldwide with the ESL.EFL version of the strategy inventory for language learning (SILL). System, 23(1), 1-23.
  • Oxford, R. L., & Gkonou, C. (2018). Interwoven: Culture, language and learning strategies. Studies in Second Learning and Teaching, 8(2), 403-426.
  • Oxford, R. L., & Nyikos, M. (1989). Variables affecting choice of language learning strategies by university students. Modern Language Journal, 73, 291-300.
  • Oxford, R. L. (1995). Gender differences in language learning styles: What do they mean? In J. M. Reid (Ed.) Learning styles in the ESL/EFL classroom (pp. 34- 46). New York: Heinle and Heinle Publishers.
  • Oxford, R. L. (1996). Personality type in the foreign or second language classroom: Theoretical and empirical perspectives. In A. Horning & R. Sudol (Eds.) Understanding literacy: personality preferences in rhetorical and psycholinguistic contexts(pp. 149-175). Creskill, NJ: Hampton Press
  • Oxford, R. L. (2001). Language learning strategies. In R. Carter & D. Nunan. (Eds.) The Cambridge guide to teaching English to speakers of other languages (pp.166-172). UK: Cambridge University Press.
  • Oxford, R. L. (2016). Teaching and researching language learning strategies: self-regulation in context. New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Park, G. (1997). Language learning strategies and English proficiency in Korean university students. Foreign Language Annuals, 30, 211–221.
  • Peacock, M., & Ho, B. (2003).Student language learning strategies across eight disciplines. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 13, 179–200.
  • Pickard, N. (1995). Out-of-class language learning strategies: three case studies. Language Learning Journal, 12, 35-37.
  • Pintrich, P. R., & Schunk, D. H. (2002). Motivation in education: Theory, research and applications (2nd ed.). New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
  • Politzer, R. (1983). An exploratory study of self reported language learning behaviours and their rclation to achievement. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 6, 54-65.
  • Politzer, R., & McGroarty, M. (1985). An exploratory study of learning behaviours and their relationship to gains in linguistic and communicativc cnmpetence. TESOL Quarterly, 19, 103- 124.
  • Prokop, M. (1989). Learning strategies for second language users: An analytical appraisal with case studies. Lewiston, NY: The Edwin Mellen Press.
  • Purdie, N., & Oliver, R. (1999). Language learning strategies used by bilingual school-aged children. System, 27, 375-388.
  • Reid, J. M. (1995). Learning styles in the ESL/EFL classroom. Boston: Heinle and Heinle.
  • Rosansky, E. (1976). Methods and morphemes in second language acquisition. Language Learning, 26, 409-425.
  • Rossi-Le, L. (1995). Learning style and strategies in adult immigrant ESL students. In J.M. Reid (ed.), Learning styles in the ESL/EFL classroom (pp 118-125). Boston: Heinle & Heinle.
  • Rubin, J. (1987). Learner strategies: theoretical assumptions, research history and typology. In Wenden, A. ve Rubin, J. (Eds.) Learner Strategies in Language Learning. Hemel Hempstead: Prentice Hall International.
  • Schmeck, R. R. (1988). Learning strategies and learning styles. New York: Plenum Press.
  • Sheikh Al Eslami, R., & Khayer, M. (2006). Relationship between motivational orientations and English language strategies in students. Journal of Psychology, 10(37), 22-33.
  • Shmais, W. (2003). Language learning strategy in Palestine. TESL-EJ, 7(2), 20-33.
  • Stebbins, C. (1995). Culture-specific perceptual – learning – style preferences of postsecondarystudents of English as a second language. In J. M. Reid (Ed.) Learning styles in the ESL/EFL classroom (pp. 108-117). New York: Heinle and Heinle Publishers.
  • Titone, R. (1990). A psycho-sociolinguistic perspective in efl learning: the role of attitude a dynamic factor. Paper presented at The World Congress of Applied Linguistics, sponsored by the International Association of Applied Linguistics (9th, Thessaloniki, Greece, 15-21 April 1990) ERIC Document Resume, ED, 326-073.
  • Wen, Q. (2001). Developmental patterns in motivation, beliefs and strategies of English learners in China. Foreign Language Teaching and Research, 33, 105-110.
  • Wenden, A. (1987). Metacognition: An Expanded View on the Cognitive Abilities of L2 Learners. Language Learning, 37, 573-597.
  • Wenden, A. L. (1986). Helping language learners think about learning. ELT Journal, Vol. 40 (1): 3-12
  • Wharton, G. (2000). Language learning strategy use of bilingual foreign language learner in Singapore. Language Learning, 50(2), 203–243.
  • Yang, W. (2016). ESP vs. CLIL: A coin of two sides or a continuum of two extremes? ESP Today, 4(1), 43-68.

Personal Factors Affecting the Usage of Language Learning Strategies

Yıl 2020, Cilt: 2 Sayı: 1, 91 - 103, 23.06.2020

Öz



The personal factors that affect students' learning
and achievement in foreign language learning process are seen as an important
issue by educators. Nowadays, curiosity about how some students have high
academic achievement and how they use the language effectively and  actively is increasing. At this point, the
paths of the successful students and the factors affecting their success
should not be ignored. Language learning strategies are the main factors that
affect the academic achievement of students. Students in the language
learning process consciously or unconsciously prefer these strategies, use
them in different situations and transfer them to different learning tasks.
However, language learning strategies are individual. In other words, the
strategies that learners use in language learning process vary from person to
person. Therefore, the learner's preferred language learning strategies are
influenced by various elements of their own. In this context, this study aims
to address a wide variety of personal factors that affect individuals'
language learning strategies. It is thought that the study will be useful in
terms of revealing the general framework of theoretical studies about the
factors that affect individuals' language learning strategy use preferences.


Kaynakça

  • Albert, R., & Habo, R. N. (1960). Anxiety in academic achievement situations. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 10, 207-215.
  • Alshenqeeti, H. (2018). Technology in the language classroom: how social media is changing the way EFL is taught. Arab World English Journal (AWEJ) Special Issue on CALL, 4, 1-14.
  • Aslan, O. (2009). The role of gender and language learning strategies in learning English. Yayımlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Ortadoğu Teknik Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Ankara.
  • Bacon, S. M. (1992). The relationship between gender, comprehension, processing strategies, cognitive, and affective response in foreign language listening. The Modern Language Journal 76, 160-178.
  • Bardwick, J. (1972). Psychology of women: a study of biocultural conflicts. New York: Harper & Row, 72(9), 1726-1727.
  • Bialystock, E., & Frohlich, M. (1978). Variables of classroom achievement in second language learning. Modern Language Journal, 62(7), 327-335.
  • Bialystok, E. (1981). The Role of conscious strategies in second language proficiency. Modern Language Journal, 65(1), 24-35.
  • Blake, J. (1989). Family size and achievement. Berkeley, California: University of California Press.
  • Bruen, J. (2001). Strategies for success: Profiling the effective learner of German. Foreign Langue Annals, 34(3), 216-25.
  • Chamot, A. U. (2004). Issues in language learning strategy research and teaching. Electronic Journal of Foreign Language Teaching 1(1), 14-26.
  • Chamot, A.U., & Keatley, C. W. (2004). Learning strategies of students of less commonly taught languages. Paper presented at the 2004 Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Diego, CA.
  • Chamot, A. U., & Kupper, L. (1989). Learning strategies in foreign language instruction. Foreign Language Annals, 22, 13-24.
  • Chang, C., & Shen, M. (2005). The effects of beliefs about language learning and learning strategy use of junior high school EFL learners in remote districts. Research in Higher Education Journal. www.aabri.com/manuscripts/10462.pdf
  • Chang, H. H. (2005). The relationship between extrinsic/intrinsic motivation and language learning strategies among college students of English in Taiwan. Master’s thesis, Ming Chuan University, Taiwan
  • Cohen, A. D. (1998). Strategies in learning and using a second language. Harlow, Essex: Longman.
  • Dornyei, Z. (2001). Attitudes, orientations, and motivations in language learning. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
  • Duffy, G. (1982). Fighting off the alligators: What research in real classrooms has to say about reading instruction. Journal of Reading Behavior, 14, 357-374.
  • Ehrman, M., & Oxford, R., 1989: Effects of sex differences, career choice, and psychological typeonadults’languagelearning strategies. Modern Language Journal, 73(1), 1-13.
  • Franken, R. E. (1982). Human Motivation. Monterey. CA: Brooks and Cole Publishing Co.
  • Gardner, R. C. (1979). Social psychological aspects of second language acquisition. In H. Giles, & R. S. Clair (Eds.), Language and social psychology (pp. 193-220). Basil: Blackwell.
  • Gardner, R. C. (1985). Social psychological and second language learning: The role of attitude and motivation. Baltimore, MD: Edward Arnold.
  • Gardner, R. C., & Lambert, W. E. (1972). Attitude and motivation in second language learning. Rowley, MA: Newbury House Publishers.
  • Gharbavi, A., & Mousavi, S. A. (2012). Do language proficiency levels correspond to language learning strategy adoption?. English Language Teaching, 5(7), 110-122.
  • Goh, C., & Kwah, P.F. (1997). Chinese ESL students‟ learning strategies: A look at frequency, proficiency, and gender. Hong Kong Journal of Applied Linguistics, 2, 39-53.
  • Grainger, P. (1997). Language-learning strategies for learners of Japanese: Investigating ethnicity. Foreign Language Annals, 30, 378–385.
  • Green, J., & Oxford, R. L. (1995). A closer look at learning strategies, L2 proficiency, and gender. TESOL Quarterly, 29, 261-297.
  • Griffiths, C. (1991). Personality and second-language learning: theory, research, and practice. http://www.eric.ed.gov/PDFS/ED367167.pdf adresinden 08.01.2020 tarihinde erişilmiştir.
  • Griffiths, C. (2003). Patterns of language learning strategy use. System, 31, 367-383
  • Griffiths, C. (2013). The strategy factor in successful language learning. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
  • Gu, P. Y. (2002). Vocabulary Learning in a Second Language: Person, Task, Context and Strategies. TESL-EJ, 7(2), 1-25.
  • Hong-Nam, K., & Leavell, A. G. (2006). Language learning strategy use of ESL students in an intensive English learning context. System 34, 399-415.
  • Horwitz, E. K., & Young, D. J. (1991). Language anxiety: from theory and research to classroom implications. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
  • Horwitz, E. K. (1985). Using student beliefs about language learning and teaching in the foreign language methods course. Foreign Language Annals, 18(4), 333-340.
  • Horwitz, E. K. (1987). Surveying student beliefs about language learning. In A. Wenden & J. Rubin (Eds.), Learning strategies in language learning. Englewood Cliffs NY: Prentice Hall.
  • Horwitz, E. K., Horwitz, M. B., & Cope, J. A. (1986). Foreign language classroom anxiety. The Modern Language Journal, 70(2), 125-132
  • Hou, Y. A. (2015). The relationship of multiple intelligences, foreign language learning anxiety and English proficiency-a case study of Taiwanese EFL college students. The International Journal of the Communication and Linguistic Studies, 12, 15-29.
  • Liu, P. C. (1973). A study of the relationships between the native chinese speakers’ spoken English proficiency and his attitude, motivation and background in learning English. Unpublished Ph.D. Dissertation, Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University.
  • Macaro, E. (2006). Strategies for language learning and for language use: revising the theoretical framework. The Modern Language Journal, 90(3), 320-337.
  • Mochizuki, A. (1999). Language learning strategies used by Japanese university students. RELC, 30(2), 101–113.
  • Nel, C. (2008) Learning style and good language learners. In C. Griffiths (ed.), Lessons from good language learners. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 49-60.
  • Nelson, G. L. (1995). Cultural differences in learning styles. In J. M. Reid (Ed.), Learning styles in the ESL/EFL classroom (pp. 3-18). New York: Heinle & Heinle Publishers.
  • Nikoopour, J., Salimian, S., Salimian, S., & Farsani, M. A. (2012). Motivation and the choice of language learning strategies. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 3(6), 1277–1283.
  • Nyikos, M., & Oxford, R. L. (1993). A factor-analytic study of language learning strategy use: Interpretations from information processing theory and social psychology. Modern Language Journal, 77(1), 11-23.
  • Nyikos, M. (1990). Sex-related differences in adult language learning: Socialization and memory factors. Modern Language Journal, 74(3).
  • O’Malley, J. M., & Chamot, A. U. (1990). Learner strategies in second language acquisition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Chamot, A. (2005). Language learning strategy instruction: Current issues and research. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 25, 112-130.
  • Opper, S., Teichler, U., & Carlson, J. (1990). Impact of study abroad programmes on students and graduates. London: Jessica Kingsley.
  • Oxford, R. L. (1989). Use of language learning strategies: A synthesis of studies with implications for strategy training. System, 17, 235-247.
  • Oxford, R. L. (1994).Language learning strategies: UN updates ERIC Digest, ERIC Digest .ERIC clearinghouse and linguistic Washington DC. http://www.vmcsatellite.com/aid,51733 adresinden 11.01.2020 tarihinde erişilmiştir.
  • Oxford, R. (2011). Teaching and researching language learning strategies. Harlow: Pearson Longman.
  • Oxford R. L. (2017). Teaching and researching language learning strategies: self-regulation in context. Routledge: New York.
  • Oxford, R. L., & Burry-stock, J. A. (1995). Assessing the use of language learning strategies worldwide with the ESL.EFL version of the strategy inventory for language learning (SILL). System, 23(1), 1-23.
  • Oxford, R. L., & Gkonou, C. (2018). Interwoven: Culture, language and learning strategies. Studies in Second Learning and Teaching, 8(2), 403-426.
  • Oxford, R. L., & Nyikos, M. (1989). Variables affecting choice of language learning strategies by university students. Modern Language Journal, 73, 291-300.
  • Oxford, R. L. (1995). Gender differences in language learning styles: What do they mean? In J. M. Reid (Ed.) Learning styles in the ESL/EFL classroom (pp. 34- 46). New York: Heinle and Heinle Publishers.
  • Oxford, R. L. (1996). Personality type in the foreign or second language classroom: Theoretical and empirical perspectives. In A. Horning & R. Sudol (Eds.) Understanding literacy: personality preferences in rhetorical and psycholinguistic contexts(pp. 149-175). Creskill, NJ: Hampton Press
  • Oxford, R. L. (2001). Language learning strategies. In R. Carter & D. Nunan. (Eds.) The Cambridge guide to teaching English to speakers of other languages (pp.166-172). UK: Cambridge University Press.
  • Oxford, R. L. (2016). Teaching and researching language learning strategies: self-regulation in context. New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Park, G. (1997). Language learning strategies and English proficiency in Korean university students. Foreign Language Annuals, 30, 211–221.
  • Peacock, M., & Ho, B. (2003).Student language learning strategies across eight disciplines. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 13, 179–200.
  • Pickard, N. (1995). Out-of-class language learning strategies: three case studies. Language Learning Journal, 12, 35-37.
  • Pintrich, P. R., & Schunk, D. H. (2002). Motivation in education: Theory, research and applications (2nd ed.). New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
  • Politzer, R. (1983). An exploratory study of self reported language learning behaviours and their rclation to achievement. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 6, 54-65.
  • Politzer, R., & McGroarty, M. (1985). An exploratory study of learning behaviours and their relationship to gains in linguistic and communicativc cnmpetence. TESOL Quarterly, 19, 103- 124.
  • Prokop, M. (1989). Learning strategies for second language users: An analytical appraisal with case studies. Lewiston, NY: The Edwin Mellen Press.
  • Purdie, N., & Oliver, R. (1999). Language learning strategies used by bilingual school-aged children. System, 27, 375-388.
  • Reid, J. M. (1995). Learning styles in the ESL/EFL classroom. Boston: Heinle and Heinle.
  • Rosansky, E. (1976). Methods and morphemes in second language acquisition. Language Learning, 26, 409-425.
  • Rossi-Le, L. (1995). Learning style and strategies in adult immigrant ESL students. In J.M. Reid (ed.), Learning styles in the ESL/EFL classroom (pp 118-125). Boston: Heinle & Heinle.
  • Rubin, J. (1987). Learner strategies: theoretical assumptions, research history and typology. In Wenden, A. ve Rubin, J. (Eds.) Learner Strategies in Language Learning. Hemel Hempstead: Prentice Hall International.
  • Schmeck, R. R. (1988). Learning strategies and learning styles. New York: Plenum Press.
  • Sheikh Al Eslami, R., & Khayer, M. (2006). Relationship between motivational orientations and English language strategies in students. Journal of Psychology, 10(37), 22-33.
  • Shmais, W. (2003). Language learning strategy in Palestine. TESL-EJ, 7(2), 20-33.
  • Stebbins, C. (1995). Culture-specific perceptual – learning – style preferences of postsecondarystudents of English as a second language. In J. M. Reid (Ed.) Learning styles in the ESL/EFL classroom (pp. 108-117). New York: Heinle and Heinle Publishers.
  • Titone, R. (1990). A psycho-sociolinguistic perspective in efl learning: the role of attitude a dynamic factor. Paper presented at The World Congress of Applied Linguistics, sponsored by the International Association of Applied Linguistics (9th, Thessaloniki, Greece, 15-21 April 1990) ERIC Document Resume, ED, 326-073.
  • Wen, Q. (2001). Developmental patterns in motivation, beliefs and strategies of English learners in China. Foreign Language Teaching and Research, 33, 105-110.
  • Wenden, A. (1987). Metacognition: An Expanded View on the Cognitive Abilities of L2 Learners. Language Learning, 37, 573-597.
  • Wenden, A. L. (1986). Helping language learners think about learning. ELT Journal, Vol. 40 (1): 3-12
  • Wharton, G. (2000). Language learning strategy use of bilingual foreign language learner in Singapore. Language Learning, 50(2), 203–243.
  • Yang, W. (2016). ESP vs. CLIL: A coin of two sides or a continuum of two extremes? ESP Today, 4(1), 43-68.
Toplam 80 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil Türkçe
Konular Alan Eğitimleri
Bölüm Makaleler
Yazarlar

Emine Akkaş Baysal 0000-0002-5711-0847

Gürbüz Ocak

Yayımlanma Tarihi 23 Haziran 2020
Gönderilme Tarihi 5 Ocak 2020
Kabul Tarihi 20 Ocak 2020
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2020 Cilt: 2 Sayı: 1

Kaynak Göster

APA Akkaş Baysal, E., & Ocak, G. (2020). DİL ÖĞRENME STRATEJİLERİNİN KULLANILMASINI ETKİLEYEN FAKTÖRLER. Necmettin Erbakan Üniversitesi Ereğli Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 2(1), 91-103.