PROVISORS VE PRAEMUNIRE YASALARI ÇERÇEVESİNDE TAHT VE PAPALIK İLİŞKİLERİ

Öz

Orta Çağ’da Avrupa’da genel itibariyle krallık ve kilise arasında rekabet ve çatışma sahnelerine çokça rastlanmaktadır. Dolayısıyla aynı durum, Orta Çağ İngiltere’sinde de görülmektedir. Çünkü Kilise, hukuken Papalığa bağlı olan bir kurumdu. Krallar ve Papalar, İngiliz din adamlarının sadakat ile bağlılıklarını sundukları efendileri idiler. Bunun yanı sıra din adamları ve dini kurumlar da Orta Çağ İngiltere’sindeki ekonomik hayatta çok etkin bir yere sahiplerdi. Yasalar konusunda da geniş yetkilere sahip olan Kilisenin üstünlük iddiaları bir çatışma sürecinin yaşanmasına neden olmuştur. Bunların en önemlileri ise krallık ve papalık arasındaki ilişkilerde bir dönüm noktası niteliğinde olan 1351 yılında yayınlanan Provisors Yasası ve 1353 yıllarında çıkarılan Praemunire Yasalarıdır. Bu yasalar ile on üçüncü yüzyılın başlarından beri İngiltere'de büyüyen anti-papalık duygusu belirginleşmiş ve hatta bölge yasalarında kalıcı hale gelmiştir. Bu çalışmada da Krallık ve Kilise arasındaki güç çatışması, bu yasalar çerçevesinde değerlendirilmeye çalışılacaktır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Orta Çağ
• Provisors Yasası
• Praemunire Yasası
• Papalık
• İngiltere

THE THRONE AND PAPAL RELATIONS IN THE FRAMEWORK OF THE STATUTE OF PROVISORS AND PRAEMUNIRE LAWS

Öz

In the Middle Ages, the kingdom and the scene of rivalry and conflict with each other are frequently encountered.Therefore, the same situation is seen in the Middle Ages England.Because the Church was an institution legally attached to the Papacy.Kings and Popes were lords to whom the British clergy offered their loyalty and allegiance.In addition, his men and religious institutions were influential in economic life in medieval England.The claims of the Church, which has broad authority over the laws, caused it to be lived in a conflict zone.The most important to begin with are the Provisors Law in 1351 and the Praemunire laws enacted in 1353, which were a turning point in the relations between the kingdom and the papacy. With these laws, the anti-papacy feeling of enlargement has become evident since the beginning of the third century and has made itself permanent in the laws of the region.In this market, the power conflict between the Kingdom and the Church will be studied to be evaluated within the framework of these laws.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• The Statute of Provisors
• Middle Age

Kaynakça

1. Barrell, A.D.M.(2002). The Papacy, Scotland and Northern England,1342-1378. Cambridge University Press.
2. Black, J. (2017). İngiltere Tarihi. Aytaç Yıldız (Çev.). Ankara: Doğu Batı Yayınları
3. Blockmans, W. and Hoppenbrouwers, P. (2014). Introduction to Medieval Europe, 300–1500. Abingdon: Routledge.
4. Cheyette, F. (1963). Kings, Courts, Cures, And Sinecures: The Statute Of Provisors And The Common Law. Traditio, 19. 295-349.
5. Coke, E.(1671). The Second Part of the Institutes of the Laws of England. London.
6. Daileader, P.(2009). Local Experiences of the Great Western Schism in Joelle Rollo-Koster- Thomas M.Izbicki(Ed.), A Companion to the Great Western Schism(1378-1417) ,(p. 89-123). Boston: Brill.
7. Davies, C. (1953). The Statute of Provisors of 1351, History, 38(133). 116-133.
8. Ellis, J. T. (1930). Anti-papal Legislation in Medieval England(1066-1377), Catholic University of America.

9. Esgin, M. (1998). Hristiyanlıkta Engizisyon Mahkemeleri, Yayınlanmamış Doktora Tezi, Selçuk Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü. Konya.
10. Flinn, F.K. (2007). Henry VIII. Encyclopedia of Catholicism. (p.345). New York: Facts on File.
11. Fritze, R.H. (2002a). Church( English) in Ronald H.Fritze and William B.Robison (Ed.), Historical Dictionary of Late Medieval England 1272-1485 (p.107-112). London: Greenwood Press.
12. Fritze, R.H. (2002b). Praemunire, Statutes of(1353,1365 and 1393) in Ronald H.Fritze and William B.Robison (Ed.), Historical Dictionary of Late Medieval England 1272-1485 (p.439-440). London: Greenwood Press.
13. Graves, E.B. (1929). The Legal Significance of the Statute of Praemunire of 1353 in Charles Homer Taylor (Ed.), Anniversary Essays in Medieval History by Students of Charles Homer Haskins (p.57-80), Houghton Mifflin Company.
14. Great Britain (1900). Calendar of the Patent Rolls 1340-3. V. London: H.M.S.O.
15. Great Britain (1963a). The Statutes of the Realm. I. London: Dawsons of Pall Mall.
16. Great Britain (1963b). The Statutes of the Realm. II. London: Dawsons of Pall Mall.
17. Gümüş, T. T. (2019). Erken İngiliz Reformasyonu ve Lollard Hareketi. Tarih Okulu Dergisi, 12( XXXIX). 528-551.
18. Hay,D. ( 1966). The Italian Renaissance in its Historical Background, Cambridge: Cambridge at the University Press.
19. Henderson, E.F. (Ed.). (1896). Constitutions of Clarendon, In Select Historical Documents of the Middle Ages. London: George Bell and Sons.
20. Holdsworth, W. S. (1922). A History of English Law, I, Methuen&Company. Hunt, W. (1906).The History of England, IV. New York: Longsmans.
21. Jason, P. D. (1997). The Courts Christian in Medieval England, The Catholic Lawyer, 37(4). 339- 341. Kain, R.J.P. (1986). An Atlas and Index of the Tithe Files of Mid-Nineteenth Century England and Wales. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
22. Kirchner, W. (1960). Western Civilization. America: Barnes &Noble. Luard, H.R.(Ed.). (1866). Annales Monastici, III. London: Longmans.
23. Martin, D. L. (2003). The Crown’s Policy against Papal Provisions in the Reign of Richard II: The Statutes of Provisors and Premunire, 1377-1394. Yayınlanmamış Doktora Tezi, The Faculty of the Department of History University of Houston. McBrien, R. (1997). Lives of the popes:the pontiffs from St. Peter to John Paul II. San Francisco: Harper.
24. McGoldrick, J. E.(2002). Provisors, Statutes of (1351 and 1390) in Ronald H.Fritze and William B.Robison (Ed.), Historical Dictionary of Late Medieval England 1272-1485 (p.450-451). London: Greenwood Press.
25. McKisack, M.( 1959). The Fourteenth Century, 1307-1399. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
26. Nicholson, W. (1809). Quare impedit, The British Encyclopedia, or, Dictionary of arts and sciences, (Vol.V, pp.23). London: C.Whittingham.
27. Ormrod, W. M. (2011). Edward III, Gloucestershire: The History Press.
28. Özer, G. (2018). Avrupa Tarihinin Akışını Değiştiren Mucize Kadınlardan Biri: Jeanne D’arc. Uluslararası İnsan ve Toplum Bilimleri Sempozyumu Tam Metin Kitabı içinde (s. 166- 178). Antalya.
29. Palmer, R.C. (2002). Selling teh Church, London: The University of North Carolina Press.
30. Parliamentary Bills&c.(1821) .III. University of Oxford.
31. Perroy, E. (1951). The Hundred Years War, London: Eyre&Spottiswoode.
32. Ramsay, J.H. (1913). Genesis of Lancaster: Or, The Three Reigns of Edward II, Edward III, and Richard II, 1307-1399. Oxford: The Clarendon Press.
33. Reeves, J. (1814). History of the English Law from the time of the Saxons, to the end of the reign of Philip and Mary. III. London: Reed and Hunter.
34. Reppy, A. (1954). The Ordinance of William the Conqueror(1072). New York: Oceana Publications.
35. Rollo- Koster, J. (2009) Civil Violence and the Initiation of the Schism, in Joelle Rollo-Koster- Thomas M.Izbicki(Ed.), A Companion to the Great Western Schism(1378-1417) ,(p. 9-67). Boston: Brill.
36. Sayles, G.O. (1936). Select Cases in the Court of King’s Bench, ed. G. O. Sayles, London: B. Quaritch.
37. Sloane, C. (1907). Advowson. The Catholic Encyclopedia. ( Vol I, pp. 169-170). New York: The Encyclopedia Press.
38. Sloane, C. (1913). Provisors. The Catholic Encyclopedia. ( Vol XII, pp. 516-517). New York: The Encyclopedia Press.
39. Smith, P.M. (2000). The Advowson: The History and Development of a Most Peculiar Property, Ecclesiastical Law Journal, 5(26). 320 – 339.
40. Stubbs, W. (1896). The Constitutional History of England . III Oxford: The Clarendon Press.
41. Swanson, R. N. (1989). Church and Society in Late Medieval England. Oxford: Blackwell.
42. Tait, J.(Ed.). ( 1914). Chronica Johannis de Reading et Anonymi Cantuariensis, 1346-67. Manchester: University of Manchester Press. Thompson, A. H. (1947). The English Clergy and Their Organization in the Later Middle Ages, Clarendon Press.
43. Tout, T. F. (1905). The History of England from the Accession of Henry III to the Death of Edward III, New York: Longmans.
44. Tuck, J.A. (1969). The Cambridge Parliament, 1388. The English Historical Review. 84(331). 225-243.
45. Ülgen, P. (2019). Magna Charta Lıbertatum’a Hazırlık: Clarendon Yasaları. 4. Uluslararası Bilimsel Araştırmalar Kongresi Bildiri Kitabı içinde (s. 300-312), Yalova .
46. Ünal, Çetin B. (2019). Avrupa'nın Felaketler Yüzyılında Bir Devrimci Olarak John Wycliffe’in Etkisi. Ortaçağ Araştırmaları Dergisi, 2(1). 80-94.
47. Viner, C. (1793). A General Abridgment of Law and Equity. London: G.G.J. and J. Robinson.
48. Yavaş, H. (2020). Geç Ortaçağ İngiltere‟sinde Bir Devrimci Hareket:1381 Köylü İsyanları Ortaçağ Araştırmaları Dergisi. 3(1). 11-21.