The Relationship between Labor Force Participation Rate and Unemployment Rate in Turkey: An Analysis Based on Gender and Education Level

Öz

According to the economic theory, changes in the unemployment rate can have two different effects on the labor force participation rate. In the periods of economic stagnation when the unemployment rate increases, the decrease in the labor force participation rate is explained by the discouraged worker effect; while the increase in labor force participation rate is explained by the added worker effect. In this study, it was investigated which of these effects is dominant in Turkey’s labor market, using data from January 2014 to July 2017. To achieve more detailed information on the relationship between labor force participation rate and the unemployment rate, the econometric analysis process was conducted using the data based on education level and gender. Findings indicate that the added worker effect is dominant for highly or vocation-educated women, while there was no significant long-term relationship between labor force participation and unemployment rate for high-skilled men.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Added Worker Effect,Discouraged Worker Effect,Labor Market,ARDL Model,Turkey

Türkiye’de İşgücüne Katılma Oranı-İşsizlik Oranı İlişkisi: Cinsiyet ve Eğitim Düzeyine Dayalı Bir Analiz

Öz

Ekonomik teoriye göre, işsizlik oranındaki değişmeler işgücüne katılma oranı üzerinde iki farkı etkiye sahip olabilmektedir. İşsizlik oranının arttığı ekonomik daralma dönemlerinde işgücüne katılma oranının azalması gücenmiş işçi etkisi, işgücüne katılma oranının artması ise ilave işçi etkisi ile açıklanmaktadır. Bu çalışmada, Ocak 2014-Temmuz 2017 dönemi verileri kullanılarak Türkiye'nin işgücü piyasasında bu iki etkiden hangisinin baskın olduğu araştırılmıştır. İşgücüne katılma oranı ile işsizlik oranı arasındaki ilişkiye yönelik daha ayrıntılı bilgiye ulaşmak amacıyla, ekonometrik analiz süreci eğitim düzeyi ve cinsiyete dayalı veriler kullanılarak yürütülmüştür. Elde edilen sonuçlara göre yüksek ya da mesleki eğitimli kadınlar için ilave işçi etkisi baskın etki iken, kalifiye erkeklerin işgücüne katılma oranı ile işsizlik oranı arasında uzun dönemli anlamlı bir ilişki bulunmamaktadır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• İlave İşçi Etkisi,Gücenmiş İşçi Etkisi,İşgücü Piyasası,ARDL Modeli,Türkiye

Kaynakça

1. Ağazade, Seymur (2014), “”Türkiye’de İşsizlik ve İşgücüne Katılım İlişkisinin Doğrusal ve Doğrusal Olmayan Koentegrasyon Yöntemleri ile Analizi, Eskişehir Osmangazi Üniversitesi İİBF Dergisi, C. 9, S. 3: 145–161.
2. Akyeampong, Ernest B. (1992), “Discouraged Workers-Where Have They Gone?”, Perspectives on Labour and Income, Vol. 4, No. 3, Article No. 5.
3. Başlevent, Cem; Onaran, Özlem (2003), “Are Married Women in Turkey More Likely to Become Added or Discouraged Workers?”, Labour, Vol. 17, No. 3: 439–458.
4. Benati, Luca (2001), "Some Empirical Evidence on the ‘Discouraged Worker’ Effect", Economics Letters, Vol. 70, No. 3: 387-395.
5. Biggart, Andy; Furlong, Andy (1996), "Educating ‘Discouraged Workers’: Cultural Diversity in the Upper Secondary School", British Journal of Sociology of Education, Vol. 17, No. 3: 253-266.
6. Blundell, Richard; Ham, John; Meghir, Costas (1998), “Unemployment, Discouraged Workers and Female Labour Supply”, Research in Economics, Vol. 52, No. 2: 103–131.
7. Bowen, William G.; Finegan, Thomas Aldrich (1969), The Economics of Labor Force Participation, Princeton: Princeton University Press.
8. Bredtmann, Julia; Otten, Sebastian; Rulff, Christian (2013), "Husband’s Unemployment and Wife’s Labor Supply: The Added Worker Effect across Europe", ILR Review: 1-31.

9. Burtan Doğan, Bahar; Kaya, Mehmet (2014), “TRC2 Bölgesinde Kadın İstihdamı Sorunları ve Çözüm Önerileri”, International Journal of Social and Economic Sciences, Vol. 4, No. 2: 91-106.
10. Cahuc, Pierre; Zylberberg, André (2004), Labor Economics, Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
11. Cain, Glen George (1966), Married Women in the Labor Force: An Economic Analysis, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
12. Darby, Julia; Hart, Robert A.; Vecchi, Michela (2001), "Labour Force Participation and the Business Cycle: A Comparative Analysis of France, Japan, Sweden and the United States", Japan and the World Economy, Vol.13, No. 2: 113-133.
13. DİSK/Genel-İş Sendikası Araştırma Dairesi (2017), Kayıtdışı İstihdam Raporu: Kasım 2017, Ankara: DİSK/Genel-İş.
14. Durak, Şuayip; Kaya, Vedat (2014), “Türkiye’de İşsizlik ve İşsizliği Azaltmaya Yönelik Politikalar: Tarihsel Bir Bakış”, Atatürk Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, C. 28, No. 2: 55–73.
15. Eğilmez, Mahfi (2017), “İşsizlik Artıyor”, http://www.mahfiegilmez.com/2017/02/issizlik-artyor.html (Erişim: 15.03.2018).
16. Filatriau, Olivier; Reynès, Frédéric (2012), "A New Estimate of Discouraged and Additional Worker Effects on Labor Participation by Sex and Age in OECD Countries", OFCE Document de travail, No. 9.
17. Fuchs, Johann; Weber, Enzo (2017),"Long-Term Unemployment and Labour Force Participation: A Decomposition of Unemployment to Test for the Discouragement and Added Worker Hypotheses", Applied Economics, Vol. 49, No. 60: 5971-5982.
18. Gong, Xiaodong (2010), "The Added Worker Effect and the Discouraged Worker Effect for Married Women in Australia" Discussion Paper no. 4816, Bonn: Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA).
19. IMF, (2017), World Economic Outlook Database, https://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/weo/2017/02/weodata/weorept.aspx?sy=2006&ey=2022&scsm=1&ssd=1&sort=country&ds=.&br=1&pr1.x=26&pr1.y=11&c=186&s=LUR&grp=0&a=#notes (Erişim: 15.03.2018).
20. Kakıcı, Hülya; Emeç, Hamdi; Üçdoğruk, Şenay (2007), “Türkiye’de Çalışan Kadınların Çocuk Bakım Tercihleri” İstanbul Üniversitesi İktisat Fakültesi Ekonometri ve İstatistik Dergisi, No. 5: 20–40.
21. Karaoglan, Deniz; Okten, Cagla (2015), "Labor-Force Participation of Married Women in Turkey: A Study of the Added-Worker Effect and the Discouraged-Worker Effect", Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, Vol. 51, No. 1: 274-290.
22. Lee, Grace H. Y.; Parasnis, Jaai (2014), "Discouraged Workers in Developed Countries and Added Workers in Developing Countries? Unemployment Rate and Labour Force Participation", Economic Modelling, Vol. 41: 90-98.
23. Leibowitz, Arleen (1975), "Education and the Allocation of Women's Time", Education, Income, and Human Behavior, (Ed. F, Thomas Juster), Cambridge: NBER: 171-198.
24. Lundberg, Shelly (1985), “The Added Worker Effect”, Journal of Labor Economics, Vol. 3, No. 1: 11–37.
25. Maloney, Tim (1987), “Employment Constraints and the Labor Supply of Married Woman: A Reexamination of the Added Worker Effect”, The Journal of Human Resources, Vol .22, No. 1: 51–61.
26. Mincer, Jacob (1962), "Labor Force Participation of Married Women: A Study of Labor Supply", Aspects of Labor Economics, (Ed. H. Gregg Lewis), Princeton: Princeton University Press: 63–105.
27. Parker, Susan W.; Skoufias, Emmanuel (2004), “The Added Worker Effect over the Business Cycle: Evidence from Urban Mexico”, Applied Economics Letters, Vol. 11, No. 10: 625-630.
28. Phillips, Peter C. B.; Perron, Pierre (1988), “Testing for a Unit Root in Time Series Regression”, Biometrika, Vol. 75, No. 2: 335–346.
29. Rankin, Bruce H.; Aytaç, Işık A. (2006), “Gender Inequality in Schooling: The Case of Turkey”, Sociology of Education, Vol. 79, No. 1: 25–43.
30. Spletzer, James R. (2007), “Reexamining the Added Worker Effect”, Economic Inquiry, Vol. 35, No. 2: 417–427.
31. Stephens, Jr., Melvin (2002), “Worker Displacement and the Added Worker Effect”, Journal of Labor Economics, Vol. 20, No. 3: 504–537.
32. Tansel, Aysit; Ozdemir, Zeynel Abidin; Aksoy, Emre (2015), “Unemployment and Labor Force Participation in Turkey”, Applied Economics Letters, Vol. 23, No. 3: 184–187.
33. T. C. Kalkınma Bakanlığı (2014), Onuncu Kalkınma Planı 2014-2018: İstihdam ve Çalışma Hayatı Özel İhtisas Komisyonu Raporu, Ankara: T. C. Kalkınma Bakanlığı.
34. TÜİK, (2017). İşgücü İstatistikleri, http://www.tuik.gov.tr/PreTablo.do?alt_id=1007 (Erişim: 26.03.2018).
35. Ulusal İstihdam Stratejisi (2014-2023) ve Eylem Planları (2017-2019) ile İlgili 04/07/2017 Tarihli ve 2017/22 Sayılı Yüksek Planlama Kurulu Kararı, T. C. Resmi Gazete, 30177-Mükerrer, 7 Temmuz 2017, http://www.resmigazete.gov.tr/main.aspx?home=http://www.resmigazete.gov.tr/eskiler/2017/07/20170707m1.htm&main=http://www.resmigazete.gov.tr/eskiler/2017/07/20170707m1.htm (Erişim: 26.3.2018).
36. UNFPA, (2017), The State of World Population 2017, New York: United Nations Population Fund, https://www.unfpa.org/sites/default/files/sowp/downloads/UNFPA_PUB_2017_EN_SWOP.pdf (Erişim: 25.03.2018).
37. United Nations (2012), The Millennium Development Goals Report 2012, New York: United Nations.
38. Yamak, Rahmi; Abdioğlu, Zehra; Mert, Nilcan (2012), “Türkiye’de İşgücüne Katılımı Belirleyen Faktörler: Mikro Ekonomik Analiz”, Anadolu Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, C. 12, No. 2: 41–58.
39. Yenilmez, Füsun; Işıklı, Burhanettin (2010), “The Comparison of Labor Force Participation Rate of Women ın Turkey with the World Country Groups”, Anadolu Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, Vol. 10, No. 3: 77-92.
40. Yıldırım, Zekeriya (2014), “The Unemployment Rate and Labor Force Participation Rate Nexus for Female: Evidence from Turkey”, International Journal of Economics and Finance, Vol. 6, No. 5: 139-146.
41. World Bank, (2017), World Development Indicators, http://databank.worldbank.org/data/reports.aspx?source=2&series=SL.TLF.CACT.FE.ZS&country=#advancedDownloadOptions (Erişim: 26.03.2018).
42. www.sgk.gov.tr