COVID-19 Pandemisini Önleyici Tedbirlere Uyma Davranışında Psikolojik Reaktans, Algılanan Risk, Korku ve Kızgınlığın Rolü ve Mesaj Diline İlişkin Bir Öneri

Semra Doğan

doi:10.17494/ogusbd.1041326

TR

COVID-19 Pandemisini Önleyici Tedbirlere Uyma Davranışında Psikolojik Reaktans, Algılanan Risk, Korku ve Kızgınlığın Rolü ve Mesaj Diline İlişkin Bir Öneri

Öz

COVID-19, bireysel ve toplumsal düzeyde tüketim kalıplarından gündelik pratiklere birçok konuda değişim ve dönüşümün yaşandığı, bu değişim ve dönüşümün de özellikle bireyler üzerinde farklı psikolojik yansımaların olduğu, küresel ölçekli bir pandemidir. Öte yandan gündelik hayatın özellikle bireysel ve kamusal alanda alınan ve uyulması gereken tedbirlerle büyük ölçüde değişmesi ve bu konuda da bireylerin iş birliğinin gerekiyor olması zorlayıcı bir etki yaratmaktadır. Tedbirlere uyma davranışının kategorik bağımlı değişken olarak kurgulandığı bu araştırmada, psikolojik reaktans, risk algısı, korku ve kızgınlık değişkenlerinin belirleyiciliği lojistik regresyon analizi ile incelenmiştir. Çevrimiçi anket ile toplanan 463 veriden elde edilen bulgular yasaklamalar ve toplumsal düzenlemeler temelindeki psikolojik reaktans, risk algısı ve korkunun tedbirlere yüksek düzeyde uyma davranışı sergilemede belirleyici olduğu ortaya konmuştur. Bu değişkenler referansında mesaj dili yolu ile hedef kitlede tedbirlere uymaya yönelik istenen davranış değişikliğini yaratmaya yönelik öneriler sunulmuştur.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Psikolojik Reaktans, Risk Algısı, Korku, Kızgınlık, Mesaj dili, Lojistik Regresyon

Kaynakça

Richards, A.S., Bessarabova, E., Banas, J.A. ve Daniel R. Bernard (2020). Reducing psychological reactance to health promotion messages: Comparing preemptive and postscript mitigation strategies. Health Communication, DOI: 10.1080/10410236.2020.1839203
Addo, P.C., Jiaming, F., Kulbo, N.B. ve Li Liangqiang (2020). COVID-19: fear appeal favoring purchase behavior towards personal protective equipment. The Service Industries Journal, 40(7-8), 471-490, DOI: 10.1080/02642069.2020.1751823
Ahorsu, D.K., Imani, V., Lin, CY., Timpka, T., Broström, A., Updegraff, J.A………Pakpour, A.H. (2020). Associations between fear of COVID-19, mental health, and preventive behaviours across pregnant women and husbands: An actor-partner interdependence modelling. International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11469-020-00340-x
Alrubaiee, G.G., Al-Qalah, T.A.H. ve Al-Aawar, M.S.A. (2020). Knowledge, attitudes, anxiety, and preventive behaviours towards COVID-19 among health care providers in Yemen: an online cross-sectional survey. BMC Public Health 20, 1541. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-020-09644-y
Bentler, P.M. ve Bonnet, D.C. (1980). Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychological Bulletin, 88 (3), 588-606.
Breakwell, G. M. ve Jaspal, R. (2020). Identity change, uncertainty and mistrust in relation to fear and risk of COVID-19. Journal of Risk Research, DOI: 10.1080/13669877.2020.1864011
Brehm, J. W. (1966) A theory of psychological reactance. New York: Academic Press.
Brehm, J. W. ve Brehm, S.S. (1981) Psychological Reactance: a theory of freedom and control. New York: Academic Press.
Brehm, S. S. ve Brehm, J. W. (2013). Psychological reactance: A theory of freedom and control. Academic Press.
Browne, MW. ve Cudeck, R. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. K. A. Bollen, J.S. Long (Ed.). Testing structural equation models içinde (136-162 ss.). Sage; Newbury Park, CA.

Cori, L., Bianchi, F., Cadum, E. ve Anthonj, C. (2020). Risk Perception and COVID-19. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17, 3114. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17093114
Do, H. J., Lim, C. G., Kim, Y. J. ve Choi, H. J. (2016, January). Analyzing emotions in twitter during a crisis: A case study of the 2015 Middle East respiratory syndrome outbreak in Korea. Paper presented at 2016 International Conference on Big Data and Smart Computing (BigComp), Hong Kong, China. Paper Erişim: http://ieeex plore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsp?tp=&arnumber=7425960&isnumber=7425793.
Robertson, E., Reeve., K.S., Niedzwiedz., C.L., Moore.J., Blake., M., Green, M., Katikireddi, S.V. ve Michaela J. Benzeval (2021). Predictors of COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy in the UK household longitudinal study. Brain, Behavior, and Immunity, 94, 41-50.
Firouzbakht, M., Omidvar, S., Firouzbakht, S. ve Asadi-Amoli, A. (2021). COVID-19 preventive behaviors and influencing factors in the Iranian population; a web-based survey. BMC Public Health, 21(1),143. DOI: 10.1186/s12889-021-10201-4.
Griffin, R. J., Yang, Z., Huurne, E., Boerner, F., Ortiz, S. ve Dunwoody, S. (2008). After the flood: Anger, attribution, and the seeking of information. Science Communication, 29, 285–315. DOI: 10.1177/1075547007312309
Hong, Sung-Mook ve Page, S. (1989). A psychological reactance scale: Development, factor structure and reliability. Psychological Reports, 1989, 64, 1323-1326.
Hovland, C., Janis, I. ve Kelley, H. (1953). Communication and persuasion. Psychological Studies of Opinion Change. New Haven, CT, US: Yale University Press
Hu, L.T. ve Bentler, P.M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6 (1), 1-55.
Huang, F., Ding, H., Liu, Z., Wu, P., Li, A. ve Zhu, T. (2020). How fear and collectivism influence public’s preventive intention towards COVID-19 infection: a study based on big data from the social media. BMC Public Health 20, 1707. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-020-09674-6.
Huynh, Toan Luu Duc (2020). The COVID-19 risk perception: A survey on socioeconomics and media Attention. Economics Bulletin, 40(1), 758-764.
Jenkins, M. ve Dragojevic, M. (2013). Explaining the process of resistance to persuasion: A politeness theory-based approach. Communication Research, 40, 559–590. DOI: 10.1177/0093650211420136
Jonason, P.K. ve Knowles, H. M. (2006). A unidimensional Measure of Hong’s Psychological reactance Scale. Psychological Reports, 2006,98,569-579.
Kamran, M. Naeim (2020). Behavioural change theories: a necessity for managing COVID-19. Public Health. Letter to the Editor.
Kline, R. B. (2011). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (3rd ed.). Guilford Press.
Krpan, D. ve Dolan, P. (2021). You must stay at home! The impact of commands on behaviors during COVID-19. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 1-14. DOI: doi.org/10.1177/19485506211005582.
Lazarus, R. S. (1991). Emotion and adaptation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Leppin, A. ve Aro, A. R. (2009). Risk perceptions related to SARS and Avian Influenza: Theoretical foundations of current empirical research. International Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 16(1), 7–29. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.02.24.20027268
Machingaidze, S. ve Wiysonge, C.S. (2021). Understanding COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy. Nature Medicine, 27, 1338–1339. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-021-01459-7
Marsh, H. W. ve Hocevar, D. (1985). Application of confirmatory factor analysis to the study of self-concept: first and higher order factor models and their invariance across groups, Psychological Bulletin, 97 (3), 562-582.
Miller, C. H., Lane, L. T., Deatrick, L. M., Young, A. M. ve Potts, K. A. (2007). Psychological reactance and promotional health messages: The effects of controlling language, lexical concreteness, and the restoration of freedom. Human Communication Research, 33, 219–240.
Murphy, J., Vallières, F., Bentall, R.P., Shevlin, M., McBride, O., Hartman, T.K……….Hyland, P. (2021). Psychological characteristics associated with COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy and resistance in Ireland and the United Kingdom. Nature Communications,12, 29 (2021). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-20226-9
Akhtar, N., Akhtar, M.N., Usman, M., Ali, M. ve Siddiqi, U.I. (2020) COVID-19 restrictions and consumers’ psychological reactance toward offline shopping freedom restoration, The Service Industries Journal, 40:13-14, 891-913, DOI: 10.1080/02642069.2020.1790535
Nguyen, N.P.T., Hoang, T.D., Tran, V.T., Vu, C.T., Siewe Fodjo, J.N., Colebunders R………..Vo, T.V. (2020). Preventive behavior of Vietnamese people in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. PLoS ONE 15(9): e0238830. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal. pone.0238830
Ofoghi, B., Mann, M. ve Verspoor, K. (2016). Towards early discovery of salient health threats: A social media emotion classification technique. Biocomputing 2016: Proceedings of the Pacific Symposium (pp. 504– 515), Hawaii: 2016 Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing.
Oh, S.-H., Paek, H.-J. ve Hove, T. (2015). Cognitive and emotional dimensions of perceived risk characteristics, genre-specific media effects, and risk perceptions: The case of H1N1 influenza in South Korea. Asian Journal of Communication, 25, 14–32. DOI: 10.1080/ 01292986.2014.989240
Ohanian, R. (1990). Construction and Validation of a Scale Measure Celebrity Endorsers’ Perceived Expertise, Trustworthiness, and Attractiveness. Journal of Advertising, 19(3), 39-52.
Öğülmüş, S. (2020, 14 Nisan). Karşıt Tepki Kuramı ve Sokağa Çıkma Yasağı. TÜRPAV Türkiye Politik ve Stratejik Araştırmalar Vakfı. https://www.turpav.org/milli-politikalar-enstitusu/saglik-gida/karsit-tepki-kurami-ve-sokaga-cikma-yasagi.html Erişim Tarihi: 10.06.2020
Slovic, P., Fischhoff, B. ve Lichtenstein, S. (1985). Characterizing perceived risk. R. W. Kates, C. Hohenemser, J. X. Kasperson (Ed.). Perilous progress: Managing the hazards of technology içinde (91-125 ss). Westview, Boulder, CO.
Paek, H.-J., Oh, S.-H. ve Hove, T. (2016). How fear-arousing news messages affect risk perceptions and intention to talk about risk. Health Communication, 31(9), 1051–1062. DOI: 10.1080/10410236.2015.1037419
Pentina, I., Bailey, A. ve Zhang, L. (2018). Exploring Effects of Source Similarity, Message Valence, and Receiver Regulatory Focus on Yelp Review Persuasiveness and Purchase Intentions. Journal of Marketing Communications, 24(2), 125-145.
Petty, R.E. ve Cacioppo, J.T. (1996). Attitudes and persuasion: Classic and contemporary approaches. USA: Westview Press.
Quick, B. L. ve Considine, J. R. (2008). Examining the use of forceful language when designing exercise persuasive messages for adults: A test of conceptualizing reactance arousal as a two-step process. Health Communication, 23, 483–491.
Quick, B. L. ve Considine, J. R. (2008). Examining the use of forceful language when designing exercise persuasive messages for adults: a test of conceptualizing reactance arousal as a two-step process. Health Communication, 23, 483–491. DOI: 10.1080/10410230802342150
Quick, B. L. ve Stephenson, M. T. (2008). Examining the role of trait reactance and sensation seeking on perceived threat, state reactance, and reactance restoration. Human Communication Research, 34, 448–476. DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-2958.2008.00328.x
Quick, B. L., Shen, L. ve Dillard, J. P. (2013). Reactance theory and persuasion, J. P. Dillard, L. Shen (Ed.) The SAGE Handbook of Persuasion: Advances in Theory and Research (2nd Ed.) içinde (167-183 ss). Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
Qureshi WA, Saud M. ve Mahmood QK (2020). Dataset on the fear, preventive behaviour and anxiety disorder during the COVID-19 pandemic in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan. Data Brief. doi: 10.1016/j.dib.2020.106579.
Rains, S. A. (2013). The nature of psychological reactance revisited: a meta-analytic review. Human Communication Research, 39, 47–73. DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-2958.2012.01443.x
Reiss, S., Franchina, V., Jutzi, C., Willardt, R. ve Jonas, E (2020) From anxiety to action— Experience of threat, emotional states, reactance, and action preferences in the early days of COVID19 self-isolation in Germany and Austria. PLoS ONE 15(12): e0243193. https://doi.org/10.1371/ journal.pone.0243193
Reynolds-Tylus T. (2019). Psychological Reactance and Persuasive Health Communication: A Review of the Literature. Frontiers in Communication, 4, 56. DOI: doi.org/10.3389/fcomm.2019.00056.
Roseman, I. J., C. Wiest ve T. S. Swartz. (1994). Phenomenology, behaviors, and goals differentiate discrete emotions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 67 (2), 206–221.
Sakai, H., Shimizu, M., Yoshimura, T. ve Hato, E. (2021). Psychological reactance to mobility restrictions due to the COVID-19 pandemic: A Japanese population study. Frontiers in Psychology, 12. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.655022
Sandman, R., Weinstein, N.E. ve Hallman, W.K. (1998). Communications to reduce risk underestimation and overestimation. Risk Decision Policy, 3, 93–108.
Oh, S. H., Lee, S. Y. ve Han, C. (2020). The Effects of Social Media Use on Preventive Behaviors during Infectious Disease Outbreaks: The Mediating Role of Self-relevant Emotions and Public Risk Perception, Health Communication, DOI:10.1080/10410236.2020.1724639
Schwarzinger, M., Watson, V., Arwidson, P., Alla, F. ve Luchini, S. (2021). COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy in a representative working-age population in France: a survey experiment based on vaccine characteristics, The Lancet Public Health, 6 (4), 210-221.
Shen, L. (2011). The effectiveness of empathy-versus fear-arousing antismoking PSAs. Health Communication, 26, 404–415. DOI: 10.1080/10410236.2011.552480
Shen, L. (2014). Antecedents to psychological reactance: The Impact of threat, message frame, and choice. Health Communication, 1–11. DOI: 10.1080/10410236.2014.910882.
Shigemura, J., Ursano, R. J., Morganstein, J. C., Kurosawa, M. ve Benedek, D. M. (2020). Public responses to the novel 2019 coronavirus (2019-nCoV) in Japan: Mental health consequences and target populations. Psychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences, 74(4), 281–282. DOI: https://doi.org/ 10.1111/pcn.12988
Sjöberg, L. (2000). Factors in risk perception. Risk Analysis, 20(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1111/ 0272-4332.00001
Slavin M.N. ve Earleywine M. (2019). Effects of Messaging and Psychological Reactance on Marijuana Craving. Substance Use Misuse. 54(14), 2359-2367. DOI: 10.1080/10826084.2019.1650771.
Slovic, P. (1987). Perception of risk. Science, 236, 280-285.
Steg, L., de Groot ve Judith I. M. (2018). Environmental Risk Perception. Steg, L., van den Berg, A. E., de Groot, J. I. M. (Ed.). Environmental Psychology (An Introduction) içinde (13-25 ss). BPS Blackwell. DOI: 10.1002/9781119241072.ch2
Taylor, S. ve Asmundson, G.J.G. (2021). Negative attitudes about facemasks during the COVID-19 pandemic: The dual importance of perceived ineffectiveness and psychological reactance. PLoS ONE 16(2): e0246317. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0246317
Tucker, R.K. ve Byers, P.Y. (1987) Factorial validity of Merz's Psychological Reactance Scale. Psychological Reports, 61, 81 1-815.
Weinstein, N. D. (1987). Unrealistic optimism about illness susceptibility: Conclusions from a communitywide sample. Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 10, 481–500. doi:10.1007/BF00846146
Wright, R. E. ve Palmer, J. C. (1996). Reactance. Journal of Nonprofit & Public Sector Marketing, 4:1-2, 3-10, DOI: 10.1300/J054v04n01_02
Yang, J. Z. ve Chu, H. (2018). Who is afraid of the Ebola outbreak? The influence of discrete emotions on risk perception. Journal of Risk Research, 21(7), 834–853. DOI:10.1080/13669877.2016.124 7378
Yıldırım, M., Geçer, E. ve Akgül, Ö. (2020). The impacts of vulnerability, perceived risk, and fear on preventive behaviours against COVID-19. Psychology, Health & Medicine, 26(1), 35-43. DOI: 10.1080/13548506.2020.1776891
Yıldırım, M., Özaslan, A. ve Arslan, G. (2021a). Perceived risk and parental coronavirus anxiety in healthcare workers: A moderated mediation role of coronavirus fear and mental well-being, Psychology, Health & Medicine, DOI: 10.1080/13548506.2021.187177.
Yıldırım, M., Arslan, G. ve Özaslan, A. (2021b). Perceived risk and mental health problems among healthcare professionals during covid-19 pandemic: Exploring the mediating effects of resilience and coronavirus fear. International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction. Advance online publication. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11469-020-00424-8.
Yoo, W., Paek, H.-J. ve Hove, T. (2018). Differential effects of contentoriented versus user-oriented social media on risk perceptions and behavioral intentions. Health Communication. Advanced online publication. DOI:10.1080/10410236.2018.1545169

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil

Türkçe

Konular

-

Bölüm

Araştırma Makalesi

Yazarlar

Semra Doğan ^*
0000-0002-6466-8734
Türkiye

Yayımlanma Tarihi

31 Aralık 2021

Gönderilme Tarihi

11 Ekim 2021

Kabul Tarihi

20 Aralık 2021

Yayımlandığı Sayı

Yıl 2021 Cilt: 22 Sayı: 2

DOI

https://doi.org/10.17494/ogusbd.1041326

IZ

https://izlik.org/JA27BA59XN

APA

Doğan, S. (2021). COVID-19 Pandemisini Önleyici Tedbirlere Uyma Davranışında Psikolojik Reaktans, Algılanan Risk, Korku ve Kızgınlığın Rolü ve Mesaj Diline İlişkin Bir Öneri. Eskişehir Osmangazi Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 22(2), 569-585. https://doi.org/10.17494/ogusbd.1041326

AMA

1.Doğan S. COVID-19 Pandemisini Önleyici Tedbirlere Uyma Davranışında Psikolojik Reaktans, Algılanan Risk, Korku ve Kızgınlığın Rolü ve Mesaj Diline İlişkin Bir Öneri. Eskişehir Osmangazi Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi. 2021;22(2):569-585. doi:10.17494/ogusbd.1041326

Chicago

Doğan, Semra. 2021. “COVID-19 Pandemisini Önleyici Tedbirlere Uyma Davranışında Psikolojik Reaktans, Algılanan Risk, Korku ve Kızgınlığın Rolü ve Mesaj Diline İlişkin Bir Öneri”. Eskişehir Osmangazi Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi 22 (2): 569-85. https://doi.org/10.17494/ogusbd.1041326.

EndNote

Doğan S (01 Aralık 2021) COVID-19 Pandemisini Önleyici Tedbirlere Uyma Davranışında Psikolojik Reaktans, Algılanan Risk, Korku ve Kızgınlığın Rolü ve Mesaj Diline İlişkin Bir Öneri. Eskişehir Osmangazi Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi 22 2 569–585.

IEEE

[1]S. Doğan, “COVID-19 Pandemisini Önleyici Tedbirlere Uyma Davranışında Psikolojik Reaktans, Algılanan Risk, Korku ve Kızgınlığın Rolü ve Mesaj Diline İlişkin Bir Öneri”, Eskişehir Osmangazi Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, c. 22, sy 2, ss. 569–585, Ara. 2021, doi: 10.17494/ogusbd.1041326.

ISNAD

Doğan, Semra. “COVID-19 Pandemisini Önleyici Tedbirlere Uyma Davranışında Psikolojik Reaktans, Algılanan Risk, Korku ve Kızgınlığın Rolü ve Mesaj Diline İlişkin Bir Öneri”. Eskişehir Osmangazi Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi 22/2 (01 Aralık 2021): 569-585. https://doi.org/10.17494/ogusbd.1041326.

JAMA

1.Doğan S. COVID-19 Pandemisini Önleyici Tedbirlere Uyma Davranışında Psikolojik Reaktans, Algılanan Risk, Korku ve Kızgınlığın Rolü ve Mesaj Diline İlişkin Bir Öneri. Eskişehir Osmangazi Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi. 2021;22:569–585.

MLA

Doğan, Semra. “COVID-19 Pandemisini Önleyici Tedbirlere Uyma Davranışında Psikolojik Reaktans, Algılanan Risk, Korku ve Kızgınlığın Rolü ve Mesaj Diline İlişkin Bir Öneri”. Eskişehir Osmangazi Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, c. 22, sy 2, Aralık 2021, ss. 569-85, doi:10.17494/ogusbd.1041326.

Vancouver

1.Semra Doğan. COVID-19 Pandemisini Önleyici Tedbirlere Uyma Davranışında Psikolojik Reaktans, Algılanan Risk, Korku ve Kızgınlığın Rolü ve Mesaj Diline İlişkin Bir Öneri. Eskişehir Osmangazi Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi. 01 Aralık 2021;22(2):569-85. doi:10.17494/ogusbd.1041326

COVID-19 Pandemisini Önleyici Tedbirlere Uyma Davranışında Psikolojik Reaktans, Algılanan Risk, Korku ve Kızgınlığın Rolü ve Mesaj Diline İlişkin Bir Öneri

Öz

COVID-19 Pandemisini Önleyici Tedbirlere Uyma Davranışında Psikolojik Reaktans, Algılanan Risk, Korku ve Kızgınlığın Rolü ve Mesaj Diline İlişkin Bir Öneri

Öz

Anahtar Kelimeler

Kaynakça

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil

Konular

Bölüm

Yazarlar

Yayımlanma Tarihi

Gönderilme Tarihi

Kabul Tarihi

Yayımlandığı Sayı

DOI

IZ

Kaynak Göster

Cited By

Pazarlama Literatüründe Psikolojik Reaktans Teorisi

Reaktancja wobec regulacji antycovidowych – systematyczny przegląd badań

Reactance against Anti-COVID Regulations – a Systematic Review