Big Fish Small Pond Effect on Academic Self-Perceptions of Gifted Students: A Systematic Review of Literature

Öz

In this study, it was aimed to systematically examine the studies in the national and international literature on the effect of BFLPE on the academic self-perceptions of gifted individuals. For this purpose, searches were made using databases and keywords. 16 articles from the studies reached in the searches were examined in this study according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Identified studies were examined under BFLPE themes in gender and ability grouping. According to the results obtained from the research, there are generally no consistent results related to the significant difference of the gender variable in academic self-perceptions for gifted students, and about BFLPE in the academic self-perception of gifted students. The results of BFLPE in the academic self-perceptions of gifted students were discussed in the literature and suggestions were presented for further research.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Özel yetenek
• akademik benlik algısı
• büyük balık küçük gölet etkisi
• sistematik alanyazın taraması.

Özel Yetenekli Öğrencilerin Akademik Benlik Algılarında Büyük Balık Küçük Gölet Etkisi: Bir Sistematik Alanyazın Taraması

Öz

Bu araştırmada özel yetenekli bireylerin akademik benlik algılarında BBKGE’nin etkisine yönelik ulusal ve uluslararası alanyazında yer alan çalışmaların sistematik olarak incelenmesi amaçlanmıştır. Bu amaçla veri tabanları ve anahtar kelimeler kullanılarak taramalar yapılmıştır. Taramalarda ulaşılan çalışmalardan 16 makale dâhil etme ve hariç tutma kriterlerine göre bu araştırmada incelenmiştir. Belirlenen çalışmalar cinsiyet ve yetenek gruplamada BBKGE temaları altında incelenmiştir. Araştırmadan elde edilen sonuca göre genel olarak özel yetenekli öğrenciler için cinsiyet değişkeninin akademik benlik algılarında anlamlı farklılığıyla ilgili ve özel yetenekli öğrencilerin akademik benlik algısında BBKGE ilgili tutarlı sonuçlar bulunmamaktadır. Özel yetenekli öğrencilerin akademik benlik algılarında BBKGE dair ulaşılan sonuçlar alanyazınla tartışılmıştır ve yapılacak araştırmalar için öneriler sunulmuştur.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Özel yetenek
• akademik benlik algısı
• büyük balık küçük gölet etkisi
• sistematik alanyazın taraması.

Kaynakça

1. Alhanaya, M. (2016). The impact of gifted schools on the academic self-concept of gifted students in Saudi Arabia, Yayınlanmamış doktora tezi, University of Northern Colorado, ABD.
2. Bachman, J. G. ve O'Malley, P. M. (1986). Self-Concepts, self-esteem, and educational experiences: the frog pond revisited (again). Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50 (1), 35-46.
3. Becker, M. ve Neumann, M. (2016). Context-related changes in academic self concept development. On the long-term persistence of big-fish-little-pond effects. Learning and instruction, 45, 31-49. https://doi.org/10.25656/01:20525
4. Brookover, W. B. (1989). Self-concept of ability scale-a review and further analysis. American Educational Research Association yıllık toplantısında sunulmuştur. Retrieved from https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED306291
5. Cash, T. N. ve Lin, T. (2022). Psychological well-being of ıntellectually and academically gifted students in self-contained and pull-out gifted programs. Gifted Child Quarterly, 66 (3), 188-207. https://doi.org/10.1177/00169862211032987.
6. Chan, L. K. S. (1988). The perceived competence of intellectually talented students. Gifted Child Quarterly. 32 (3), 310-314. https://doi.org/10.1177/001698628803200303
7. Chiu, M-S. (2012) The ınternal/external frame of reference model, big-fish-little-pond effect, and combined model for mathematics and science. Journal of Educational Psychology, 104 (1), 87 107. Doi: 10.1037/a0025734
8. Coleman, J. M. ve Fults, B. A. (1985). Special class placement, level of intelligence, and the self-concept of gifted children: A social comparison perspective. Remedial and Special Education, 6, 7-11. https://doi.org/10.1177/074193258500600102

9. Cornell, D. G., Delcourt, M. A. B., Goldberg, M. D. ve Bland, L. C. (1992). Characteristics of elementary students entering gifted programs: the learning outcomes project at the university of virginia. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 15 (4) 309- 331. https://doi.org/10.1177/016235329201500402
10. Cunningham, L. G. ve Rinn, A. N. (2007). The role of gender and previous participation in a summer program on gifted adolescents' self-concepts over time. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 30 (3), 326-352. https://doi.org/10.1177/016235320703000303
11. Clarke, V., Braun, V. ve Hayfield, N. (2017). Thematic analysis. In J. A. Smith (Ed.), Qualitative psychology: A practical guide to research methods (pp. 232–248). Sage.
12. Dai, D. Y. (2001). A comparison of gender differences in academic self-concept and motivation between high-ability and average chinese adolescents. The Journal of Secondary Gifted Education 13 (1), 22-32. https://doi.org/10.4219/jsge-2001-361
13. Dai, D. Y. (2002). Are gifted girls motivationally disadvantaged? Review, reflection, and redirection. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 25, 315-358.
14. Dai, D. Y. (2004). How universal is the big-fish-little-pond effect? American Psychologist, 59 (4), 267- 268. Doi:10.1037/0003-066X.59.4.267
15. Dai, D. Y. ve Rinn, A. N. (2008). The big-fish-little-pond effect: What do we know and where do we go from here? Educational Psychology Review, 20 (3), 283-317.Doi:10.1007/s10648-008-9071-x.
16. Dai, D. Y., Rinn, A. N. ve Tan, X. (2012). When the big fish turns small: Effects of participating in gifted summer programs on academic self-concepts. Journal of Advanced Academics, 24(1), 1-26. Doi:10.1177/1932202X12473425.
17. Dickhäuser, O. (2005). A fresh look: Testing the internal/external frame of reference model with frame-specific academic self-concepts. Educational Research, 47(3), 279-290. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312032001161
18. Fang J, Huang X, Zhang M, Huang F, Li Z ve Yuan Q (2018) The Big-Fish-Little-Pond Effect on Academic Self-Concept: A Meta-Analysis. Frontiers in Psychology. 9(1569), 1-11. Doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01569.
19. Festinger, L. (1954). A theory of social comparison processes. Human Relations, 7 (2), 117 140. https://doi.org/10.1177/001872675400700202
20. Goetz, T., Preckel, F., Zeidner, M. ve Schleyer, E. (2008). Big fish in big ponds: A multilevel analysis of test anxiety and achievement in special gifted classes. Anxiety, Stress, & Coping, 21 (2), 185-198. Doi: 10.1080/10615800701628827.
21. Herrman, J., Schmidt, I., Kessels,U. ve Preckel, F. (2016). Big fish in big ponds: Contrast and assimilation effects on mathand verbal self-concepts of students in within-school gifted tracks. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 86, 222-240. Doi:10.1111/bjep.12100.
22. Huguet, P., Dumas, F., Marsh, H., Regner, I., Wheeler, L., Suls, J., Seaton, M., Nezlek, J. (2009). Clarifying the role of social comparison in the big-fish-little-pond effect (BFLPE): An integrative study. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97(1), 156-170. Doi:10.1037/a0015558.
23. Hoge, R. D. ve Renzulli, J. S. (1993). Exploring the link between giftedness and self-concept. Review of Educational Research, 63 (4), 449-465. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543063004449
24. Kulik, J. A. ve Kulik, C.L. (1982). Effects of ability grouping on secondary school students: A meta analysis of evaluation findings. American Educational Research Journal, 19, 415-428. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312019003415
25. Kulik, C. L. ve Kulik, J. A. (1991). Ability grouping and gifted students. N. Colangelo ve G. A.Davis (Ed.), Handbook of gifted education içinde (ss. 178-196). Pearson.
26. Liberati, A., Altman, D. G., Tetzlaff, J., Mulrow, C., Gotzsche, P. C., Ioannidis, J. P. A., Clarke, M.Devereaux, P. J., Kleijnen, J. ve Moher, D. (2009). The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviewsand meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions:explanation and elaboration. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 62(4), 1-34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2009.06.006
27. Liou, P-Y (2013). Investigation of the big-fish-little-pond effect on students’ self-concept of learning mathematics and science in taiwan: Results from tımss 2011. Asia-Pacific Education Research, 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-013-0152-3
28. Marsh, H. W. (1984). Self-concept, social comparison, and ability grouping: A reply to Kulik and Kulik. American Educational Research Journal, 21(4), 799-806. Doi:10.2307/1163002.
29. Marsh, H. W. (1986). Verbal and math self-concepts: An internal/external frame of reference model. American Educational Research Journal, 23 (1), 129-149. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312023001129
30. Marsh, H. W. (1987). The big-fish-little-pond effect on academic self-concept. Journal of Educational Psychology,79, 280-295. Doi:10.1037/0022-0663.79.3.280.
31. Marsh, H. W. (1990a). Influences of ınternal and external frames of reference on the formation of math and english self-concepts. Journal of Educational Psychology,82 (1), 107-116. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.82.1.107
32. Marsh, H. W. (1990b). Causal ordering of academic self-concept and academic achievement: A multiwave, longitudinal panel analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 646- 656.
33. Marsh, H. W. (1991). The failure of high ability high schools to deliver academic benefits: The importance of academic self-concept and educational aspirations. American Educational Research Journal, 28, 445-480.
34. Marsh, H. W., Chessor, D., Craven, R. ve Roche, L. (1995). The effects of gifted and talented programs on academic self-concept: The big fish strikes again. American Educational Research Journal, 32, 285-319. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312032002285
35. Marsh, H. W. ve Hau, K. T. (2003). Big-fish-little-pond effect on academic self-concept: A Cross cultural (26-country) test of the negative effects of academically selective schools. American Psychologist, 58, 364-376. Doi:10.1037/0003-066X.58.5.364.
36. Marsh, H. W., Seaton, M., Trautwein, U., Lüdtke, O., Hau, K. T., O’Mara, A. J., Craven, R. G. (2008). The big-fish-little-pond effect stands up to critical scrutiny: Implications for theory, methodology, and future research. Educational Psychology Review, 20, 319 350. Doi:10.1007/s10648-008-9075-6.
37. Marsh, H. W. ve Parker, J. W. (1984). Determinants of self-concept: Is it better to be a relatively large fish in a small pond even if you don’t learn to swim as well. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47, 213-231. Doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.47.1.213
38. Marsh, H.W. ve Rowe, K. J. (1996). The negative effects of school-average ability on academic self concept – an application of multilevel modelling. Australian Journal of Education, 40, 65–87. https://doi.org/10.1177/000494419604000105
39. Mei Yeo, M. M. ve Garces-Bacsal, R. M. (2014) Factors Influencing Academic Self-Concept of High Ability Girls in Singapore, Roeper Review, 36 (4), 235-248, Doi:10.1080/02783193.2014.945222
40. Möller, J., Pohlmann, B., Köller, O., ve Marsh, H. W. (2009). A meta-analytic path analysis of the internal/external frame of reference model of academic achievement and academic self concept. Review of Educational Research, 79, 1129–1167. Doi:10.3102/0034654309337522.
41. Niepel, C., Brunner, M., and Preckel, F. (2014). The longitudinal interplay of students’ academic self concepts and achievements within and across domains: replicating and extending the reciprocal internal/external frame of reference model. Journal of Educational Psychology,106, 1170–1191. Doi: 10.1037/a00 36307.
42. Shields, C. M. (2002). A comparison study of student attitudes and perceptions in homogeneous and heterogeneous classrooms. Roeper Review, 24, 115-119. Doi:10.1080/02783190209554146 Steenbergen-Hu, S. ve Moon, S. (2011). The effects of acceleration on high-ability learners: A meta analysis. Gifted Child Quarterly, 55(1), 39-53. doi:10.1177/0016986210383155
43. Parker, P. D. Marsh, H. W., Lüdtke, O. ve Trautwein, U. (2013). Differential school contextual effects for math and English: Integrating the big-fish-little-pond effect and the internal/external frame of reference. Learning and Instruction, 23, 78-89. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2012.07.001
44. Preckel, F. ve Brüll, M. (2010). The benefit of being a big fish in a big pond: Contrast and assimilation effects on academic self-concept. Learning and Individual Differences, 20, 522-531. Doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2009.12.007
45. Preckel, F., Götz, T. ve Frenzel, A. (2010). Ability grouping of gifted students: Effects on academic self concept and boredom. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 80, 451–472. Doi:10.1348/000709909X480716.
46. Preckel, F., Zeidner, M., Goetz, T.ve Schleyer, E. J. (2008). Female ‘big fish’ swimming against the tide: The ‘big-fish-little-pond effect’ and gender-ratio in special gifted classes. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 33, 78-96. Doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2006.08.001
47. Preckel, F., Schmidt, I., Stumpf, E., Motschenbacher, M., Vogl, K., Scherrer, V. Ve Schneider, W. (2019). High‐ability grouping: Benefits for gifted students’ achievement development without costs in academic self‐concept. Child development, 90(4), 1185-1201.
48. Reuman, D. A. (1989). How social comparison mediates the relation between ability-grouping practices and students' achievement expectancies in mathematics. Journal of Educational Psychology, 81 (2), 178-189. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.81.2.178
49. Rinn, A. N. (2006). Effects of a summer program on the social self-concepts of gifted adolescents. The Journal of Secondary Gifted Education,17 (2), 65-75. https://doi.org/10.4219/jsge-2006 682
50. Rinn, A. N. (2007). Effects of programmatic selectivity on the academic achievement, academic self concepts, and aspirations of gifted college students. Gifted Child Quarterly, 51, 232-245. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986207302718
51. Rindermann, H. ve Heller, K. A. (2005). The benefit of gifted classes and talent schools for developing students’ competences and enhancing academic self-concept. German Journal of Educational Psychology, 19 (3), 133–136. Doi: 10.1024/1010-0652.19.3.133
52. Sak, U. (2013). Üstün zekâlılar: Özellikleri tanılanmaları eğitimleri. Ankara: Vize Yayıncılık.
53. Schneider, B. H., Clegg, M. R., Byrne, B. M., Ledingham, J. E. ve Crombie, G. (1989). Social relations of gifted children as a function of age and school program. Journal of Educational Psychology, 81 (1), 48-56. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.81.1.48
54. Sung, Y. T., Huang, L. Y., Tseng, F. L., and Chang, K. E. (2014). The aspects and ability groups in which little fish perform worse than big fish: examining the big-fish-little pond effect in the context of school tracking. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 39(3), 220 232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2014.05.002
55. Thijs, J., Verkuyten, M. ve Helmond, P. (2010). A further examination of the big-fish–little pond effect: perceived position in class, class size, and gender comparisons. Sociology of Education, 83(4) 333–345. Doi: 10.1177/0038040710383521.
56. Tokmak, F. (2016). Özel eğitim gruplamasının üstün yetenekli öğrencilerin akademik benlik algıları üzerindeki etkisi. Yayınlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi, Anadolu Üniversitesi, Eskişehir.
57. Tokmak, F., Sak, U. ve Akbulut, Y. (2021). Özel yetenekli öğrencilerin akademik benlik algıları üzerindeki büyük balık-küçük gölet etkisi. Eğitim ve Bilim, 46 (206), 91-106. Doi: 10.15390/EB.2021.9303
58. Yeung, A. S., Yan Chow, A. P., Wa Chow, P. C., Luk, F. ve Por Wong, E. K. (2004) Academic Self Concept of Gifted Students: When the Big Fish Becomes Small, Gifted and Talented International, 19 (2), 91-97, Doi: 10.1080/15332276.2004.11673042.
59. Zeidner, M. ve Schleyer, E. J. (1998). The big-fish–little-pond effect for academic self-concept, test anxiety, and school grades in gifted children. Contemporary Educational Psychology 24 (4), 305 329. https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1998.0985
60. Zhou, Y. (2018). The big fish-little pond effect in gifted youth in China. Yayınlanmamış doktora tezi, State University of New York.
61. Wilson, H. E., Siegle, D., McCoach, D. B., Little, C. A. and Reis, S. M. (2014). A model of academic self concept: Perceived difficulty and social comparison among academically accelerated secondary school students. Gifted Child Quarterly, 58 (2), 111-126. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986214522858