Prososyallik, Empatik Eğilim ve Dindarlık Arasındaki İlişkiler Üzerine Bir Araştırma

Öz

Bu çalışmada yardım etme, diğerkâm davranışlar sergileme, fedakârlık yapma, bağışlama, başkasını düşünme ve öncelemeyi içeren prososyal davranışlar ve empatik eğilim ile dindarlık arasındaki ilişki ele alınmıştır. Araştırmada bu amaca uygun olarak prososyallik, empatik eğilim ve dindarlık arasındaki korelasyon, regresyon ve aracılık ilişkileri incelenmiştir. Nicel olarak gerçekleştirilen bu çalışmada Ayten ve Korkmaz tarafından geliştirilen Prososyallik Ölçeği, Dökmen tarafından geliştirilen Empatik Eğilim Ölçeği ve Zagumny ve diğerleri tarafından geliştirilen Bireysel Dindarlık Ölçeği kullanılmıştır. Araştırmada dokümantasyon ve ilişkisel tarama metoduna başvurulmuştur. Çalışmanın örneklemi, gönüllü olarak katılım sağlayan 267 kişiden müteşekkildir. Ankete katılan bireylerin 83’ü (%31,1) erkek iken 184’ü (%68,9) kadındır. Yaş aralığı 17 ile 60 arasında değişirken, çalışmada yaş ortalaması 25,61’dir. Araştırmanın bulgularına göre bireysel dindarlık ile prososyallik, empatik eğilim ve dini ibadet arasında pozitif yönde anlamlı düzeyde ilişki tespit edilmiştir. Prososyallik ile dini ibadet ve empatik eğilim arasında da pozitif ve anlamlı ilişki olduğu görülmüştür. Bireysel dindarlık hem prososyalliği hem de empatik eğilimi yordarken, dini ibadet sadece prososyalliği yordamıştır. Empatik eğilimle prososyallik arasındaki ilişkide bireysel dindarlığın kısmî aracılık rolüne sahip olduğu tespit edilmiştir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• din psikolojisi
• prososyallik
• empati
• dindarlık
• dini ibadet

An Investigation on the Links Between Prosociality, Empathic Tendency, and Religiousness

Öz

In this study, prosocial behaviors including helping, altruistic behaviors, giving, forgiveness, thinking and prioritizing someone else, and the relationship between empathic tendency and religiosity were discussed. Correlation, regression and mediation analysis between prosociality, empathic tendency and religiosity were investigated in the study in accordance with this purpose. In this quantitative study, the Prosociality Scale developed by Ayten and Korkmaz, the Empathic Tendency Scale developed by Dökmen and the Individual Religiosity Scale developed by Zagumny et al. were used. Relational survey and documentation methods were used in the research. The sample of the study consists of 267 volunteers. 83 (31.1%) of the respondents are male, 184 (68.9%) are women. Age range varies between 17 and 60, the average age in the study is 25.61. According to the findings of the study, positive significant relationships were found between individual religiosity with prosociality, empathic tendency and religious practices. There were positive and significant relationships between prosociality with religious practices and empathic tendency. Individual religiousness predicted both prosociality and empathic tendency, while religious practices only predicted prosociality. Individual religiosity partially mediated the relationship between empathic tendency and prosociality.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Psychology of Religion
• Prosociality
• Empathy
• Religiousness
• Religious Practices.

Kaynakça

1. Ahmed, Ali - Hammarstedt, Mats. “The Effect of Subtle Religious Representations on Cooperation”. International Journal of Social Economics 38/11 (2011), 900-910.
2. Akkuş, Halil İbrahim. Türk toplumunun dindarlık algısı (Batı Akdeniz örneği). Isparta: Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Doktora Tezi, 2018.
3. Ayten, Ali. “Dinî Bağlılık ve Dinî Kimliğin Ruh Sağlığına Katkısı Nedir? Din Eğitimi Alan Öğrenciler Üzerine Bir Araştırma”. Din, Erdem ve Sağlık. ed. Ali Ayten. İstanbul: Çamlıca Yayınları, 2015.
4. Ayten, Ali. Empati ve Din: Türkiye’de Yardımlaşma ve Dindarlık Üzerine Psiko-sosyal Bir Araştırma. İstanbul: İz Yayıncılık, 2013. Ayten, Ali. Prososyal Davranışlarda Dindarlık ve Empatinin Rolü. İstanbul: Marmara Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Doktora Tezi, 2009.
5. Ayten, Ali - Korkmaz, Sezai. “The Relationships Between Religiosity, Prosociality, Satisfaction With Life And Generalised Anxiety: A Study On Turkish Muslims”. Mental Health, Religion and Culture 22/10 (26 Kasım 2019), 980–993. https://doi.org/10.1080/13674676.2019.1695246
6. Ayten, Ali-Yıldız, Refik. “Dindarlık, Hayat Memnuniyeti İlişkisinde Dinî Başa Çıkmanınrolü Nedir?Emekliler Üzerine Bir Araştırma”. Dinbilimleri Akademik Araştırma Dergisi 16/1 (2016), 281-308.
7. Bar-Tal, Daniel. “Introduction”. Development and Maintenance of Prosocial Behavior. ed. Ervin Staub vd. New York: Plenum Press, 1984. Bar-tal, Inbal Ben-Ami vd. “Empathy and Pro-Social Behavior in Rats”. Science 334/6061 (09 Aralık 2011), 1427-1430. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1210789
8. Batara, Jame Bryan L. vd. “Effects of Religious Priming Concepts on Prosocial Behavior Towards Ingroup and Outgroup”. Europe’s Journal of Psychology 12/4 (18 Kasım 2016), 635-644. https://doi.org/10.5964/ejop.v12i4.1170

9. Batson, C. Daniel vd. Din ve Birey Sosyal Psikolojik Bir Yaklaşım. çev. Ali Kuşat - Abdulvahap Taştan. Kimlik Yayınları, 2017.
10. Batson, C. Daniel vd. “Empathy and Altruism”. Handbook of Positive Psychology. ed. C. R. Snyder - Shane J. Lopez. New York: Oxford University Press, 2002.
11. Batson, C. Daniel - Flory, Janine Dyck. “Goal-Relevant Cognitions Associated with Helping by Individuals High on Intrinsic, End Religion”. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 29/3 (1990), 346. https://doi.org/10.2307/1386463
12. Beyerlein, Kraig. “The Effect of Religion on Blood Donation in the United States”. Sociology of Religion 77/ (13 Temmuz 2016), srw016. https://doi.org/10.1093/socrel/srw016
13. Bierhoff, Hans-Werner. Prosocial Behaviour. New York: Taylor and Francis, 2005.
14. Blogowska, Joanna vd. “Religious Prosociality and Aggression: It’s Real”. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 52/3 (2013), 524-536. https://doi.org/10.1111/jssr.12048
15. Bradley, Christopher. “The Interconnection Between Religious Fundamentalism, Spirituality, And The Four Dimensions of Empathy”. Review of Religious Research 51/2 (2009), 201-219.
16. Budak, Selçuk. Psikoloji Sözlüğü. Bilim Ve Sanat Yayınları, 5. Basım, 2017.
17. Bushman, Brad J. vd. “When God Sanctions Killing: Effect of Scriptural Violence on Aggression”. Psychological Science 18/3 (01 Mart 2007), 204-207. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01873.x
18. Campbell, Donald T. “On the Conflicts Between Biological and Social Evolution and Between Psychology and Moral Tradition”. Zygon® 11/3 (1976), 167-208. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9744.1976.tb00277.x
19. Cappellen, Patty Van vd. “Religiosity and Prosocial Behavior Among Churchgoers: Exploring Underlying Mechanisms”. The International Journal for the Psychology of Religion 26/1 (02 Ocak 2016), 19-30. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508619.2014.958004
20. Clark, Walter Huston - Warner, Caroline M. “The Relation of Church Attendance to Honesty, and Kindness in a Small Communiiy”. Religious Education 50/5 (01 Eylül 1955), 340-342. https://doi.org/10.1080/0034408550500512
21. Cline, V. B. - Richards, J. M. “A Factor-Analytic Study Of Religious Belief And Behavior”. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1/ (Haziran 1965), 569-578. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0022083
22. Crosby, Robert G. - Smith, Erin I. “Church Support as a Predictor of Children’s Spirituality and Prosocial Behavior”. Journal of Psychology and Theology 43/4 (01 Aralık 2015), 243-254. https://doi.org/10.1177/009164711504300402
23. Çakmak, Ahmet. Lise Öğrencilerinde Dkab Eğitimi ile Hayatı Anlamlandırma Arasında Dindarlık ve Sorumluluğun Aracılık Rolünün İncelenmesi. Erzurum: Atatürk Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Doktora Tezi, 2018.
24. Damiano, Rodolfo F. vd. “Empathy in Medical Students Is Moderated by Openness to Spirituality”. Teaching and Learning in Medicine 29/2 (03 Nisan 2017), 188-195. https://doi.org/10.1080/10401334.2016.1241714
25. Decety, Jean vd. “Empathy as a driver of prosocial behaviour: highly conserved neurobehavioural mechanisms across species”. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 371/1686 (19 Ocak 2016). https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2015.0077
26. Donahue, Michael J. - Benson, Peter L. “Religion and the Well-Being of Adolescents”. Journal of Social Issues 51/2 (1995), 145-160. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.1995.tb01328.x
27. Dökmen, Üstün. İletişim Çatışmaları ve Empati. İstanbul: Sistem Yayınları, 2005.
28. Dökmen, Üstün. “Empatinin Yeni Bir Modele Dayanılarak Ölçülmesi ve Psikodrama ile Geliştirilmesi”. Ankara Üniversitesi Egitim Bilimleri Fakültesi Dergisi 21/1 (1988), 001-034.
29. Duriez, Bart. “Are religious people nicer people? Taking a closer look at the religion–empathy relationship”. Mental Health, Religion & Culture 7/3 (01 Eylül 2004), 249-254. https://doi.org/10.1080/13674670310001606450
30. Eisenberg, Nancy. “Altruism and the assessment of empathy in the preschool years”. Child Development 51 (1980), 552-557.
31. Eisenberg, Nancy (ed.). “Introduction”. The Development of Prosocial Behavior. New York: Academic Press, 1982.
32. Eisenberg, Nancy vd. “Prosocial Behavior in The Preschool Years: Methodological and Conceptual Issues”. Development and Maintenance of Prosocial Behavior. New York: Plenum Press, 1984.
33. Eisenberg, Nancy vd. “Prosocial Development”. Handbook of Child Psychology: Social, Emotional, and Personality Development Volume 3. ed. William Damon vd. New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons, 2006.
34. Eisenberg, Nancy vd. “Prosocial development in adolescence: A longitudinal study”. Developmental Psychology 27/5 (1991), 849-857. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.27.5.849
35. Eisenberg, Nancy - Fabes, Richard. “Empathy: Conceptualization, Measurement, and Relation to Prosocial Behavior”. Motivation and Emotion 14/2 (1990), 131-149.
36. Eisenberg, Nancy - Miller, Paul A. “The relation of empathy to prosocial and related behaviors”. Psychological Bulletin 101/1 (1987), 91-119. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.101.1.91
37. Eisenberg, Nancy - Mussen, P.H. The Roots of Prosocial Behavior in Children. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1989. Eisenberg-Berg, Nancy - Roth, Karlsson. “Development of young children’s prosocial moral judgment: A longitudinal follow-up”. Developmental Psychology 16/4 (1980), 375-376. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.16.4.375
38. Feshbach, Norma Deitch. “Sex Differences in Empathy and Social Behavior in Children”. The Development of Prosocial Behavior. ed. Nancy Eisenberg. New York: Academic Press, 1982.
39. Francis, L. J. vd. “Religious Diversity, Empathy, And God İmages: Perspectives From The Psychology Of Religion Shaping A Study Among Adolescents in the UK”. Journal of Beliefs & Values 33/3 (2012), 293-307.
40. Francis, Leslie J. - Pearson, Paul R. “Empathic Development during Adolescence: Religiosity, the Missing Link?” Personality and Individual Differences 8/1 (01 Ocak 1987), 145-148. https://doi.org/10.1016/0191-8869(87)90024-9
41. Franzoi, Stephen L. Social Psychology. Boston: McGraw-Hill, 2003. http://archive.org/details/socialpsychology0003fran Furrow, James L. vd. “Religion and Positive Youth Development: Identity, Meaning, and Prosocial Concerns”. Applied Developmental Science 8/1 (01 Ocak 2004), 17-26. https://doi.org/10.1207/S1532480XADS0801_3
42. Galen, Luke W. “Does Religious Belief Promote Prosociality? A Critical Examination”. Psychological Bulletin 138/5 (2012), 876-906.
43. Gillet, Kyle Stephen. Parantel and Religious Influences on Adolescent Empathy and Antisocial Behavior among Latino and Euro-American Youth: An Investigation of Mediating and Moderating Effects. Texas: Texas Tech University, Ph.D., 2006. Goleman, Daniel. Duygusal Zeka. çev. Banu Seçkin Yüksel. İstanbul: Varlık Yayınları, 1996.
44. Göcen, Gülüşan. Şükür ve psikolojik iyi olma arasındaki ilişki üzerine bir alan araştırması. Ankara: Ankara Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Doktora Tezi, 2012.
45. Gürsu, Orhan - Apaydın, Çiğdem. “Narsizm ile Özgüven Arasındaki İlişkide İslâmî Eğilimin Aracılık Rolü”. Ekev Akademi Dergisi 0/66 (2016), 551-562.
46. Güven, Metin. Narsisizm Alçakgönüllülük ve Dindarlık İlişkisi. Erzurum: Atatürk Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Doktora Tezi, 2019.
47. Hacıkeleşoğlu, Hızır - Kartopu, Saffet. “Merhamet ve Dindarlık: Üniversite Öğrencileri Üzerine Ampirik Bir Araştırma”. The Journal of Academic Social Science Studies 59 (2017), 203-227.
48. Hoffman, Martin L. Empathy and Moral Development: Implications for Caring and Justice. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2000.
49. Hur, Yoon-Mi vd. “Religious Attendance Moderates the Environmental Effect on Prosocial Behavior in Nigerian Adolescents”. Twin Research and Human Genetics 22/1 (Şubat 2019), 42-47. https://doi.org/10.1017/thg.2018.71
50. Johnson, Megan K. vd. “Priming Christian Religious Concepts Increases Racial Prejudice”. Social Psychological and Personality Science 1/2 (01 Nisan 2010), 119-126. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550609357246
51. Karaca, Faruk. Din Psikolojisi. Trabzon: Eser Ofset Matbaacılık, 2015. http://www.kitapyurdu.com/kitap/din-psikolojisi/319028.html&filter_name=faruk%20karaca
52. Karslı, Necmi. Öfke Kontrolü ve Dindarlık İlişkisi (Erzurum Örneği). Erzurum: Atatürk Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Doktora Tezi, 2011.
53. Kartopu, Saffet vd. “Sorumluluk Duygusu ve Dindarlık: Üniversite Öğrencileri Üzerine Ampirik Bir Araştırma”. Uluslararası Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi 11/58 (2018), 465-488.
54. Khan, Ziasma Haneef vd. “Muslim attitudes toward religion, religious orientation and empathy among Pakistanis”. Mental Health, Religion & Culture 8/1 (2005), 49-61. https://doi.org/10.1080/13674670410001666606
55. Krebs, D. “Empathy and altruism”. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 32/6 (1975), 1134.
56. Krevans, Julia - Gibbs, John C. “Parents’ Use of Inductive Discipline: Relations to Children’s Empathy and Prosocial Behavior”. Child Development 67/6 (1996), 3263-3277. https://doi.org/10.2307/1131778
57. Laubmeier, Kimberly K. vd. “The Role of Spirituality in the Psychological Adjustment to Cancer: A Test of the Transactional Model of Stress and Coping”. International Journal of Behavioral Medicine 11/1 (01 Mart 2004), 48. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327558ijbm1101_6
58. Leahy, R. L. “Development of conceptions of prosocial behavior: Information affecting rewards given for altruism and kindness”. Developmental Psychology 15 (1979), 34-37.
59. Lindenberg, Siegwart. “Prosocial Behavior, Solidarity, and Framing Processes”. Soidarity and Prosocial Behavior: An Integration of Sociological and Psychological Perspectives. ed. Detlef Fetchenhauer vd. Usa: Springer, 2006.
60. Lopez, N. L. vd. “Parental disciplinary history, current levels of empathy, and moral reasoning in young adults”. North American Journal of Psychology 3/2 (2001), 193-204.
61. Markstrom, Carol A. vd. “Frameworks of Caring and Helping in Adolescence: Are Empathy, Religiosity, and Spirituality Related Constructs?” Youth & Society 42/1 (01 Eylül 2010), 59-80. https://doi.org/10.1177/0044118X09333644
62. Mattis, Jacqueline S. vd. “Religiosity, Volunteerism, and Community Involvement among African American Men: An Exploratory Analysis”. Journal of Community Psychology 28/4 (2000), 391-406. https://doi.org/10.1002/1520-6629(200007)28:4<391::AID-JCOP2>3.0.CO;2-A
63. McCullough, Michael E. - Willoughby, Brian L. B. “Religion, Self-Regulation, and Self-Control: Associations, Explanations, and Implications”. Psychological Bulletin 135/1 (Ocak 2009), 69-93. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0014213
64. McKay, Ryan vd. “Wrath of God: Religious Primes and Punishment”. Proceedings. Biological Sciences 278/1713 (22 Haziran 2011), 1858-1863. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2010.2125
65. Morgan, S. Philip. “A research note on religion and morality: Are religious people nice people?” Social Forces 61/3 (1983), 683-692. https://doi.org/10.2307/2578129
66. Norenzayan, Ara - Shariff, Azim F. “The Origin and Evolution of Religious Prosocilality”. Science 322/58 (2008), 58-62. Özcan, Zeynep. “Empati ve Dindarlık Arasındaki İlişki”. İnsan ve Toplum Bilimleri Araştırmaları Dergisi 5/8 (25 Aralık 2016), 2758-2781. https://doi.org/10.15869/itobiad.258550
67. Özcan, Zeynep. Merhamet Psikolojisi. İstanbul: Çamlıca Yayınları, 2020.
68. Paek, Ellen. “Religiosity and Perceived Emotional Intelligence among Christians”. Personality and Individual Differences 41/3 (01 Ağustos 2006), 479-490. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2006.01.016
69. Pazhoohi, Farid vd. “Effect of Religious Day on Prosocial Behavior: A Field Study”. The International Journal for the Psychology of Religion 27/2 (03 Nisan 2017), 116-123. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508619.2017.1301742
70. Pichon, Isabelle vd. “Nonconscious Influences of Religion on Prosociality: A Priming Study”. European Journal of Social Psychology 37/5 (2007), 1032-1045. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.416
71. Preston, Jesse Lee vd. Religion, Personality and Social Behavior. ed. Vassilis Saroglou. New York: Taylor and Francis, 2014. Preston, Jesse Lee - Ritter, Ryan S. “Different Effects of Religion and God on Prosociality with the Ingroup and Outgroup”. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin 39/11 (Kasım 2013), 1471-1483. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167213499937
72. Rabelo, André L. A. - Pilati, Ronaldo. “Are religious and nonreligious people different in terms of moral judgment and empathy?” Psychology of Religion and Spirituality, No Pagination Specified-No Pagination Specified. https://doi.org/10.1037/rel0000277
73. Reutter, Kirby K. Religiosity and Spirituality as Resiliency Resources: Moderation, Mediation, or Moderated Mediation? Indiana: Indiana University, Ph.D., 2014.
74. Rogers, Carl R. “Empatik Olmak, Değeri Anlaşılmamış Bir Varoluş Şeklidir”. çev. Füsun Akkoyun. Ankara University Journal of Faculty of Educational Sciences (JFES) 16/1 (1983), 103-124. https://doi.org/10.1501/Egifak_0000000929
75. Roth, Eric. “Pro-Social Behavior: Contributions of Religiosity, Empathic Concern, and Spirituality”. International Journal of Latin American Religions 1/2 (01 Aralık 2017), 401-417. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41603-017-0024-3
76. Saroglou, Vassilis. “Is Religion Not Prosocial at All? Comment on Galen (2012)”. Psychological Bulletin 138/5 (Eylül 2012), 907-912. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0028927
77. Saroglou, Vassilis vd. “Prosocial Behavior and Religion: New Evidence Based on Projective Measures and Peer Ratings”. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 44/3 (2005), 323-348. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5906.2005.00289.x
78. Saroglou, Vassilis vd. “Values and religiosity: A meta-analysis of studies using Schwartz’s model”. Personality and Individual Differences 37/4 (2004), 721-734. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2003.10.005
79. Sham, Fariza Md vd. “Religiosity as Mediator in Reducing Misconduct of Adolescents-at-Risk”. Journal of Religion and Health 59/4 (01 Ağustos 2020), 2096-2109. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10943-019-00951-2
80. Shariff, Azim F. vd. “Religious Priming: A Meta-Analysis With a Focus on Prosociality”. Personality and Social Psychology Review 20/1 (01 Şubat 2016), 27-48. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868314568811
81. Stavrova, Olga - Siegers, Pascal. “Religious Prosociality and Morality across Cultures: How Social Enforcement of Religion Shapes the Effects of Personal Religiosity on Prosocial and Moral Attitudes and Behaviors”. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin 40/3 (Mart 2014), 315-333. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167213510951
82. Strayer, Janet - Schroeder, Marianne. “Children’s Helping Strategies: Influences of Emotion, Empathy, and Age”. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development 1989/44 (1989), 85-105. https://doi.org/10.1002/cd.23219894407
83. Stürmer, Stefan - Mark Snyder (ed.). The Psychology of Prosocial Behavior. Malaysia: Wiley-Blackwell, 2010.
84. Tokur, Behlül. Stres-Dindarlık İlişkisi Üzerine Bir Araştırma. Erzurum: Atatürk Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Doktora Tezi, 2011.
85. Uysal, Veysel. “Yetişkinlikte Dindarlık ve Kültürel Arka Planı”. Yetişkinlik Dönemi Eğitimi ve Problemleri. ed. Faruk Bayraktar. İstanbul: Ensar Neşriyat, 2006.
86. Vural, Muhammet Enes. Yetişkinlerde Alçakgönüllülük, Dindarlık ve Psikolojik İyi Oluş İlişkisi. İstanbul: Marmara Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Yüksek Lisans Tezi, 2016.
87. Watson, P. J. vd. “Dimensions of religiosity and empathy”. Journal of Psychology and Christianity 4/3 (1985), 73-85. Watson, P. J. vd. “Dimensions of Religiosity and Empaty”. Journal of Psychology 117 (1984), 211-216.
88. Watson, P. J. vd. “Empathy, Religious Orientation, and Social Desirability”. The Journal of Psychology 117/2 (01 Temmuz 1984), 211-216. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223980.1984.9923679
89. Zagumny, M. J. vd. “Psychometric analysis of the Religious Identity Index”. Presentation at the 24th Annual Convention of the Association for Psychological Science, (May 2012), 107.
90. Zaki, Jamil - Ochsner, Kevin. “Empathy”. Handbook of Emotions. ed. Lisa Feldman Barret vd. New York: Guilford Press, 2016.