Pediatrik Popülasyonda Unsinat Proses Üst Yapışma Yeri ve Etmoid Çatı Varyasyonlarının Değerlendirilmesi

Öz

Amaç: Çalışmanın amacı, pediatrik popülasyonda uncinate prosesin üst yapışma yerini ve olfaktör fossa derinliği varyasyonlarını bilgisayarlı tomografi (BT) yardımıyla değerlendirmek, aralarındaki ilişkiyi incelemek ve endoskopik sinüs cerrahisinde komplikasyonlardan kaçınmak için farkındalık oluşturmaktır. Materyal ve Metot: Toplam 420 hasta çalışmaya dahil edildi ve 840 taraf incelemesi yapıldı. Koronal planda alınan BT görüntüleri kemik penceresinde dijital olarak incelendi ve Keros sınıflamasına göre olfaktör fossa derinliği ölçümleri yapıldı. Ayrıca, uncinate prosesin üst yapışma yerinin değerlendirilmesinde Landsberg ve Friedman sınıflaması kullanıldı ve sonuçlar istatistiksel yöntemlerle karşılaştırıldı. Dağılımlar yaş grupları arasında karşılaştırıldı ve SAUP ile OFD/Keros kategorileri arasındaki ilişki analiz edildi. Bulgular: Keros Sınıflamasına göre hastaların %23.7’si Keros I, %67.1’i Keros II ve %9.2’si Keros III idi. Uncinate prosesin üst adezyon yerinin dağılımı incelendiğinde, olfaktör fossa derinlikleri ile uncinate prosesin üst yapışma yerlerinin dağılımı arasında istatistiksel olarak anlamlı bir korelasyon yoktu. Sonuç: Bu pediatrik kohortta OFD yaşa bağlı belirgin değişkenlik gösterirken, SAUP paternlerinin OFD/Keros kategorileri ile anlamlı bir ilişkisi saptanmadı. Bu bulgular, özellikle frontal resesle ilişkili girişimler planlanırken, pediatrik preoperatif BT değerlendirmesinin yaşa duyarlı şekilde yorumlanmasını desteklemektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Çocuk
• etmoid kemik
• çok kesitli bilgisayarlı tomografi
• kafa tabanı
• unsinat proses

Destekleyen Kurum

Yok

Etik Beyan

Çalışmamız Sakarya Üniversitesi Etik Komitesi tarafından onaylandı (Tarih: 08.10.2021; Karar No: 489). Araştırma protokolü, Helsinki Bildirgesi ile belirlenen etik ilkeler ve ülkemizdeki yasa ve yönetmeliklerle oluşturulmuştur

Teşekkür

Yok

Evaluation of Uncinate Process Upper Attachment Sites and Ethmoid Roof Variations in Pediatric Population

Öz

Objective: The aim of the study is to evaluate the uncinate process upper attachment site (SAUP) and depth of the olfactory fossa (OFD) variations in the pediatric population with the help of computed tomography (CT), to examine a relationship between them and to create awareness in order to avoid complications in endoscopic sinus surgery. Materials and Methods: A total of 420 people who met the appropriate criteria were included in the study, and 840 side reviews were conducted. CT images taken in the coronal plane were examined digitally in the bone window, and OFD measurements were made according to the Keros classification. In addition, Landsberg's and Friedman's classification was used in the evaluation of the SAUP and the results were compared with statistical methods. Distributions were compared across age groups, and the association between SAUP and OFD/Keros categories was analyzed. Results: According to the Keros Classification, 23.7% of the patients were Keros I, 67.1% were Keros II, and 9.2% were Keros III. When the distribution of the SAUP was examined, there was no statistically significant correlation between the OFD and the SAUP. Conclusion: In this pediatric cohort, OFD demonstrated clear age-related variation, whereas SAUP patterns showed no significant association with OFD/Keros categories. These findings support age-conscious interpretation of preoperative pediatric CT imaging, particularly when planning frontal recess–related procedures.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Child
• ethmoid bone
• multislice computed tomography
• skull base
• uncinate process

Destekleyen Kurum

None

Etik Beyan

Our study was approved by the Sakarya University Ethical Committee (Date: 08.10.2021; Decision No: 489). The research protocol was created by the ethical principles established by the Declaration of Helsinki and laws and regulations in our country.

Teşekkür

None

Kaynakça

1. 1. Netto B, Piltcher OB, Meotti CD, Lemieszek J, Isolan GR. Computed tomography imaging study of the superior attachment of the uncinate process. Rhinology. 2015;53(2):187-191. doi:10.4193/Rhino14.174
2. 2. Başak S, Akdilli A, Karaman CZ, Kunt T. Assessment of some important anatomical variations and dangerous areas of the paranasal sinuses by computed tomography in children. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2000;55(2):81-89. doi:10.1016/s0165-5876(00)00362-1
3. 3. Keros P. On the practical value of differences in the level of the lamina cribrosa of the ethmoid. Z Laryngol Rhinol Otol. 1962;41:809-813
4. 4. Gera R, Mozzanica F, Karligkiotis A, et al. Lateral lamella of the cribriform plate, a keystone landmark: proposal for a novel classification system. Rhinology. 2018;56(1):65-72. doi:10.4193/Rhin17.067
5. 5. Yenigun A, Goktas SS, Dogan R, Eren SB, Ozturan O. A study of the anterior ethmoidal artery and a new classification of the ethmoid roof (Yenigun classification). Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2016;273(11):3759-3764. doi:10.1007/s00405-016-4064-8
6. 6. Stammberger H, Posawetz W. Functional endoscopic sinus surgery. Concept, indications and results of the Messerklinger technique. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 1990;247(2):63-76. doi:10.1007/BF00183169
7. 7. Lee S, Fernandez J, Mirjalili SA, Kirkpatrick J. Pediatric paranasal sinuses-Development, growth, pathology, & functional endoscopic sinus surgery. Clin Anat. 2022;35(6):745-761. doi: 10.1002/ca.23888.
8. 8. Landsberg R, Friedman M. A computer-assisted anatomical study of the nasofrontal region. Laryngoscope. 2001;111(12):2125-2130. doi:10.1097/00005537-200112000-00008

9. 9. Güldner C, Zimmermann AP, Diogo I, Werner JA, Teymoortash A. Age-dependent differences of the anterior skull base. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2012;76(6):822-828. doi:10.1016/j.ijporl.2012.02.050
10. 10. Güven M, Elden H, Yaylacı A, Güven EM, Kara A, Orha AT. Age-dependent differences of the depth of olfactory fossa in children. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol. 2022;88 Suppl 5(Suppl 5):S52-S56. doi:10.1016/j.bjorl.2021.09.006
11. 11. Kansu L. The relationship between superior attachment of the uncinate process of the ethmoid and varying paranasal sinus anatomy: an analysis using computerised tomography. ENT Updates. 2019;9(2):81-89. doi:10.32448/entupdates.595449
12. 12. Kikawada T, Araki Y, Okamoto T. Anterior ethmoid and frontal sinus drainage pathways: five patterns formed and defined by their bony walls. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2023;280(1):199-206. doi: 10.1007/s00405-022-07517-1.
13. 13. Nair PP, Varghese A, Kumar N, Varghese SS. Computed Tomographic Study of Frontal Sinus Cells and Opacification as Per the International Frontal Sinus Anatomy Classification. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2024;76(4):3451-3457. doi: 10.1007/s12070-024-04724-6.
14. 14. Berger G, Grinevych V, Milewska AJ, Łukasiewicz A, Tarasów E. Estimation of the ethmoid roof depth and length of lateral lamella of the cribriform plate, upper attachment of the uncinate process and anterior ethmoid artery in multiplanar reconstructions of Computed Tomography. Pol Przegl Chir. 2020;92(5):1-5. doi:10.5604/01.3001.0014.2471
15. 15. Fikir M, Treviño-González JL, González Andrade B, Morales Del Angel JA. Anatomical Variants of the Uncinate Process: A Challenge in the Endoscopic Surgery of the Nose and Paranasal Sinuses. Cureus. 2023;15(12):e50914. doi:10.7759/cureus.50914
16. 16. Yaprak F, Coban I, Ozer MA, Eraslan C, Govsa F. The Upper Attachment of the Uncinate Process and Anterior Ethmoidal Artery. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2024;133(2):181-189. doi:10.1177/00034894231191311
17. 17. Al-Qudah M, Mardini D. Computed tomographic analysis of frontal recess cells in pediatric patients. Am J Rhinol Allergy. 2015;29(6):425-429. doi:10.2500/ajra.2015.29.4243
18. 18. Srivastava M, Tyagi S. Role of Anatomic variations of Uncinate Process in Frontal Sinusitis. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2016;68(4):441-444. doi:10.1007/s12070-015-0932-6
19. 19. Calvo-Henriquez C, Mayo-Yañez M, Chiesa-Estomba CM, Martinez-Capoccioni G, Martin-Martin C. Relationship between the Superior Attachment of the Uncinate Process and Pneumatization of the Middle Turbinate—A Radiological Study. Surgeries. 2022; 3(2):134-141. doi:10.3390/surgeries3020015
20. 20. Patel RB, Nair NR, Contractor JA, Patel JA, Vasani AM. Role of CT-PNS in non-neoplastic sino-nasal diseases: an observational study at tertiary care center in South Gujarat. Int J Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2019;5(2):345-51.
21. 21. Barroso MS, Araújo BC, Jacinto J, Marques C, Gama I, Barros E. Association between the insertion type of the uncinate process and the development of Frontal Sinus Mucoceles - is there a relationship? Acta Otorrinolaringol Esp (Engl Ed). 2021;72(4):246-251. doi: 10.1016/j.otoeng.2020.06.005.
22. 22. Turgut S, Ercan I, Sayin I, Başak M. The relationship between frontal sinusitis and localization of the frontal sinus outflow tract: a computer-assisted anatomical and clinical study. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2005;131(6):518-522. doi:10.1001/archotol.131.6.518
23. 23. Goldman-Yassen AE, Meda K, Kadom N. Paranasal sinus development and implications for imaging. Pediatr Radiol. 2021;51(7):1134-1148. doi: 10.1007/s00247-020-04859-y.
24. 24. Cheng SY, Yang CJ, Lee CH, et al. The association of superior attachment of uncinate process with pneumatization of middle turbinate: a computed tomographic analysis. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2017;274(4):1905-1910. doi:10.1007/s00405-016-4441-3