Fen Eğitiminde Bilgi İşlemsel Düşünme ve Bütünleştirilmiş Alanlar Yaklaşımı (STEAM)

Kaan Batı; İlke Çalışkan; M.İkbal Yetişir

EN TR

Computational Thinking and Integrative Education (STEAM) in Science Education

Abstract

Within the scope of this article, primarily, Computational Thinking, STEM approach which emphasize computational thinking as one of the basic points and the STEAM (Science-Technology- Engineering, Arts and Mathematics) approach which rose from critics of STEM are addressed with emphasis in different perspectives from different countries. At the end of the article, from the viewpoint of literature in our country and world, some suggestions are presented for future research in STEAM and Computational Thinking.

Keywords

science education,computational thinking,STEM,STEAM

Kaynakça

Adıgüzel, T., Ayar, M. C., Corlu, M. S., & Özel, S. (2012). Fen, teknoloji, mühendislik ve matematik (FeTeMM) eğitimi: Disiplinlerarası çalışmalar ve etkilişimler [STEM education in the Turkish context: Interdisciplinary investigations and interactions]. Paper presented at the X. Ulusal Fen Bilimleri ve Matematik Eğitimi Kongresi, Niğde, Turkey. (http://fetemm.tstem.com/home/sunumveyazilar/yazi1 Erişim Tarihi: 24.03.2016:)
Ananiadou, K. & M. Claro (2009), "21st Century Skills and Competences for New Millennium Learners in OECD Countries", OECD Education Working Papers, No. 41, OECD Publishing, Paris. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/218525261154
Armknecht, M. P. (2015). Case Study on the Efficacy of an Elementary STEAM Laboratory School. A Dissertation submitted to the Education Faculty of Lindenwood University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Education School of Education.
Barr, V. & Stephenson, C. (2011). Bringing Computational Thinking to K-12: What is Involved and What is the Role of the Computer Science Education Community? ACM Inroads, 2(1), 48-54.
Barr, D., Harrison, J. & Conery, L. (2011). Computational Thinking: A Digital Age Skill for Everyone. Learning & Leading with Technology, 38(6), 20-23.
Brown, B. H. & Martinez, D. (2012). Engaging Diverse Learners Through the Provision of STEM Education Opportunities. Southeast Comprehensive Center, Breafing Paper. http://secc.sedl.org/resources/briefs/diverse_learners_STEM/Diverse_Learners_through_STEM.pdf
Corlu, M. S., Capraro, R. M. & Capraro, M. M. (2014). FeTeMM Eğitimi ve Alan Öğretmeni Eğitimine Yansımaları. Eğitim ve Bilim, 39(171), 74-85.
David A. Sousa & Tom Pilecki (2013). From STEM to STEAM: Using Brain-Compatible Strategies to Integrate the Art. Corwin Press.
European Parlament Communities (2015). Encouraging STEM studies Labour Market Situation and Comparison of Practices Targeted at Young People in Different Member States. http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/STUD/2015/542199/IPOL_STU(2015)542199_EN.pdf
Frykholm, J. A., & Glasson, G. E. (2005). Connecting mathematics and science instruction: Pedagogical content knowledge for teachers. School Science and Mathematics, 105, 127-141.

Gonzalez, H. & Kuenzi, J. (2012). Science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) education: A primer. Congressional Research Service, August, 2012.
Henriksen, Danah (2014) "Full STEAM Ahead: Creativity in Excellent STEM Teaching Practices,"The STEAM Journal: 1(2), 1-7. DOI: 10.5642/steam.20140102.15
Jin, Y., Chong, L. M. & Cho, H. K. (2012). Designing a Robotics-Enhanced Learning Content for STEAM Education2012 9th International Conference on Ubiquitous Robots and Ambient Intelligence (URAI) Daejeon, Korea / November 26-29, 2012
Kalelioğlu, F., & Gülbahar, Y. (2015). Bilgi İşlemsel Düşünme Nedir ve Nasıl Öğretilir?, 3th International Instructional Technology and Teacher Education Symposium. Trabzon, Türkiye, September 9 – 11, 2015.
Knuth, D. E.. (1985). Algorithmic Thinking and Mathematical Thinking. The American Mathematical Monthly, 92(3), 170–181. http://doi.org/10.2307/2322871
Kuenzi, J. J. (2008). Science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) education: Background, federal policy, and legislative action. Congressional Research Servies Reports, Paper 35, CRS-1- CRS-3. Retrieved from http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/crsdocs/35/
Kwona, S., Namb, D. & Lee, T. (2011). The Effects of Convergence Education based STEAM on Elementary School Students’ Creative Personality. T. Hirashima et al. (Eds.) (2011). Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Computers in Education. Chiang Mai, Thailand: Asia-Pacific Society for Computers in Education.
Lee, Kyung-Hwa (2005). The relationship between creative thinking ability and creative personality of preschoolers. International Education Journal, 6(2), 194-199.
Lu, J. J. & Fletcher, G. H. L. (2009). Thinking about computational thinking ACM SIGCSE Bulletin - SIGCSE '09 Volume 41 Issue 1, March 2009 Pages 260-264.
Martinsen, Q. L. (2011) The Creative Personality: A Synthesis and Development of the Creative Person Profile, Creativity Research Journal, 23:3, 185-202, DOI: 10.1080/10400419.2011.595656
Moye, J. (2011). Putting core academics into context, CTE courses provide an excellent platform for students to learn the relevance of science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) as well as literature, arts, and social studies. Retrieved from http://www.eric.ed.gov/PDFS/EJ926077.pdf
Namje Park. (2014). The Development of STEAM Career Education Program using Virtual Reality Technology. Life Sci J 2014;11(7):676-679] (ISSN:1097-8135). http://www.lifesciencesite.com
National Science Board. (2007). National action plan for addressing the critical needs of the U.S. science, technology, engineering, and mathematics education system (NSB-07-114). Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
Oh, J., Lee, J. & Kim, J. (2013). Development and Application of STEAM Based Education Program Using Scratch: Focus on 6th Graders’ Science in Elementary School. J. J. (Jong Hyuk) Park et al. (eds.), Multimedia and Ubiquitous Engineering, Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering 240, DOI: 10.1007/978-94-007-6738-6_60, Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht.
Park, S. Y., Song K. S., & Kim, S. H., (2015). Cognitive Load Changes in Pre-Service Teachers with Computational Thinking Education. International Journal of Software Engineering and Its Applications Vol. 9, No. 10, s. 169-178
Park, N., & Ko, Y. (2012). Computer Education‘s Teaching-Learning Methods Using Educational Programming Language Based on STEAM Education, In: Park, J., Zomaya, A., Yeo, S., et al (eds.), 2012; vol. 7513:320-327.
Papanikolaou, K. (2010). Introducing robotics to teachers and schools: Experiences from the terecop project. Constructivism: Paris. Retrieved from http://hermes.di.uoa.gr/frangou/papers/eurologo%202010.pdf Peter J. Denning (2009). The profession of It beyond computational thinking. Communications Of The Acm, 52(6). DOI:10.1145/1516046.1516054
President’s Council of Advisors on Science and Technology (2010). Report to the presıdent prepare and inspıre: k-12 educatıon in scıence, technology, engıneerıng, and math (stem) for America’s future. https://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/microsites/ostp/pcast-stem-ed-final.pdf (Erişim:20 Mayıs, 2016)
Rabalais, M. E. (2014). STEAM: A National Study of the Integration of the Arts into STEM Instruction and its Impact on Student Achievement. A Dissertation Presented to the Graduate Faculty of the University of Louisiana Lafayette In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Education
Resnick, M. & Silverman, B. (2005). "Some reflections on designing construction kits for kids", Proceedings of the 2005 Conference on Interaction Design and Children (IDC '05), pp. 117–122, DOI: 10.1145/1109540.1109556.
Rotherham, A. J. & Willingham, D. T. (2010). 21st-Century Skills, Not New, but Worthy Challenge. American Educator, Spring 2010, 17-20.
Runco, M. A. (2004). Creativity. Annual Review of Psychology, 55, 657–687.
Sadler, T. D. (2004). Informal reasoning regarding socioscientific issues: A critical review of research. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41(5), 513-536.
Selby, E. C., Shaw, E. J. & Houtz, J. C. (2005) The creative personality. Gifted Child Quarterly, 49(4), 300 – 314.
Shuchi Grover and Roy Pea (2013). Computational Thinking in K–12: A Review of the State of the Field. Educational Researcher, Vol. 42 No. 1, pp. 38–43 DOI: 10.3102/0013189X12463051
SoonBeom Kwona , Dongsoo Namb & TaeWuk Leec. (2011). The Effects of Convergence Education based STEAM on Elementary School Students’ Creative Personality. T. Hirashima et al. (Eds.). Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Computers in Education. Chiang Mai, Thailand: Asia-Pacific Society for Computers in Education
Thomasian, J. (2011). Building a science, technology, engineering, and math education agenda: An update of state actions. Washington, DC: National Governors Association (NGA), Center for Best Practices. Retrieved from http://www.nga.org/files/live/sites/NGA/files/pdf/1112STEMGUIDE.PDF
Walker, A. K. & Zeidler, L. D. (2007). Promoting discourse about socioscientific issues through scaffolded inquiry. International Journal Of Science Education, 29(11), 1387-1410.
Weintrop, D., Beheshti, E., Horn, M.S., Orton, K., Jona, K., Trouille, L., & Wilensky, U. (2014). Defining Computational Thinking for Science, Technology, Engineering, and Math. Poster presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association (AERA 2014), Philadelphia, USA. http://ccl.northwestern.edu/2014/CT-STEM_AERA_2014.pdf
Wing, J. M. (2008). Computational thinking and thinking about computing. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. 366, 3717–3725 Wing, J. (2006). Computational thinking. Communications of the ACM, 49(3), 33–36
Yadav, A., Zhou, N., Mayfield, C., Hambrusch, S. E. & Korb, J. T. (2011). Introducing Computational Thinking in Education. Proceeding SIGCSE '11 Proceedings Of The 42nd ACM Technical Symposium On Computer Science Education. 465 – 470
Yakman, G, (2008). STΣ@M Education: an overview of creating a model of integrative education. Pupils Attitudes Towards Technology. 2008 Annual Proceedings. Netherlands.
Yakman, G. & Hyonyong, L. (2012). Exploring the Exemplary STEAM Education in the U.S. as a Practical Educational Framework for Korea. J Korea Assoc. Sci. Edu, Vol. 32, No. 6, pp. 1072-1086.
Yamak, H., Bulut, N ve Dündar, S. (2014) 5. Sınıf Öğrencilerinin Bilimsel Süreç Becerileri ile Fene Karşı Tutumlarına FeTeMM Etkinliklerinin Etkisi. GEFAD, 34(2): 249-265
Zeidler, D.L., Sadler, T.L., Simmons, M.L., & Howes, E. V. (2005). Beyond STS: A research based framework for socioscientific issues education. Science Education, 89(3), 357-377
Zeidler, D. L. & Keefer, M. (2003). The role of moral reasoning and the status of socioscientific issues in science education: Philosophical, psychological and pedagogical considerations. In D. L. Zeidler (Ed.), The role of moral reasoning on socioscientific issues and discourse in science education. The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Press.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil

Türkçe

Konular

-

Bölüm

Araştırma Makalesi

Yazarlar

Kaan Batı ^*

İlke Çalışkan

M.İkbal Yetişir

Yayımlanma Tarihi

1 Ocak 2017

Gönderilme Tarihi

18 Temmuz 2016

Kabul Tarihi

27 Ekim 2016

Yayımlandığı Sayı

Yıl 2017 Cilt: 41 Sayı: 41

IZ

https://izlik.org/JA25XG88UW

APA

Batı, K., Çalışkan, İ., & Yetişir, M. (2017). Fen Eğitiminde Bilgi İşlemsel Düşünme ve Bütünleştirilmiş Alanlar Yaklaşımı (STEAM). Pamukkale Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 41(41), 91-103. https://izlik.org/JA25XG88UW

27767 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

Fen Eğitiminde Bilgi İşlemsel Düşünme ve Bütünleştirilmiş Alanlar Yaklaşımı (STEAM)

Computational Thinking and Integrative Education (STEAM) in Science Education

Abstract

Keywords