Mülkiyetin Bir Biçimi Olarak Beden ve Biyosa Genişleyen Mülkiyet

Yıl 2025, Cilt: 9 Sayı: 2, 557 - 570, 20.06.2025

Osman Özarslan

https://doi.org/10.30586/pek.1594881

Öz

Bu çalışmada en genel anlamıyla, sermaye ve biyolojinin birbirine entegre olmasıyla birlikte ortaya çıkan biyo-sermayenin, mülkiyetin ve sermayenin sınırlarını fiziki dünyadan biyolojik dünyaya doğru genişletmesi ele alınmaktadır. Bu genişlemeyle birlikte bir yandan, mülkiyetin tanımı ve kapsam alanı değişirken, bir yandan da mülkiyetin bu yeni formlarının yasallaşabilmesi için kölelik hukuku ve kapitalizmin klasik dönemlerinden kalma içtihatlar yeniden güncellenmektedir. Dolasıyla bu çalışma bir yandan biyo-sermayenin ortaya çıkışını diğer yandan da, bu sermayeye alan açan kolonici uygulamaların, şirket tüzel kişiliğinin ve kölecilik hukukunun nasıl birbirinin içine geçtiğini anlamaya çalışmaktadır. Bu problematiğin açıklığa kavuşturulması için, kapitalizmin klasik dönemine ait mülkiyet hukuku ile biyo-sermayenin geliştirmiş olduğu mülkiyet hukuku, literatür taramasına dayalı metinsel bir karşılaştırmayla ele alınmıştır. Bu taramanın sonunda, makalede de görülebileceği üzere, köleliğin kaldırılmasının ardından sermayenin antropomorfikleşmesi, biyo-sermaye alanında özel bir boyuta taşınmakla kalmamış aynı zamanda biyoloji bazlı patentler, mülkiyet, sahiplik ve fikri mülkiyet hakları söz konusu olduğunda, çağdaş hukukun 19. Yüzyılın sonlarında lağvedilmiş olan kölelik hukukuna bağlı içtihatlar yaptığı görülmüştür.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Beden , Biyos , Biyo-Sermaye , Mülkiyet , Kölelik

The Body as a Form of Property and Property Expanding into the Body

Öz

In the most general sense, this study deals with the expansion of the boundaries of property and capital from the physical world to the biological world by bio-capital, which emerged with the integration of capital and biology. With this expansion, on the one hand, the definition and scope of property changed, and on the other hand, slavery law and jurisprudence from the classical periods of capitalism were updated in order to legalise these new forms of property. Therefore, this study seeks to understand the emergence of bio-capital on the one hand, and on the other, how colonialist practices, corporate legal personality, and slavery law intertwine to create space for this capital. In order to clarify this problem, the property law of the classical period of capitalism and the property law developed by bio-capital are discussed through a textual comparison based on a literature review. At the end of this review, as can be seen in the article, the anthropomorphism of capital following the abolition of slavery has not only been carried to a special dimension in the field of bio-capital but also in the case of biology-based patents, ownership, possession, and intellectual property rights. Thus, it has been observed that contemporary law has jurisprudence based on slavery law, which was abolished in the late 19th century.

Anahtar Kelimeler

body , bios , biyo-capital , property , slavery

Kaynakça

• Babeuf, G. (1796). Manifesto of the Equals. https://www.marxists.org/history/france/revolution/conspiracy-equals/1796/manifesto.htm
• Barakat, M. (2024) Virginia Judge to Decide Whether State Law Consider Embryos as Property. https://apnews.com/article/frozen-embryos-virginia-court-case-ivf-f33d8d57ad4f3073c6f306007d781df0
• Bensaid, D. (2017). Mülksüzler: Marx, Odun Hırsızları ve Yoksulların Hukuku. Dipnot Yayınları: Ankara.
• Berger, B. (2006). It’s not about the fox: The untold history of Pierson v. Post, 55, Duke Law Journal, 1089-1143
• Best, S. M. (2004). The fugitive’s properties: law and the poetics of possession. University of Chicago Press: Chicago
• Biehl, J. (2005) Vita, Life in a Zone of Social Abandonment University of California Press: California
• Bossuet, J. B., & Riley, P. (1990). Politics drawn from the very words of Holy Scripture (1st paperback ed). Cambridge University Press.
• Boström, D., Hughes-Schepher, N. (2012). The body of the enemy. https://static1.squarespace.com/static/57b1ba7746c3c4e559a7a8c5/t/5a33a73753450a16519856f1/1513334584865/Body+of+the+Enemy-NS-H%26Bostrom.pdf
• Bracton, H. d., Thorne, S. E., & Selden Society. (1968). Bracton on the laws and customs of England = Bracton de legibus et consuetudinibus Angliae. Belknap Press: Cambridge
• Buenos Aires Herald (2023) Milei calls for “market mechanisms” to solve lack of organ donors https://buenosairesherald.com/politics/milei-calls-for-market-mechanisms-to-solve-lack-of-organ-donors
• Cabral, S. (2023) Colorado ex-funeral directors jailed for selling body parts
• Cahill, K. (2001). Who Owns Britain. Canongate: Edinburgh
• Challaye, F. (1969). Mülkiyetin Tarihi. Remzi Yayınevi: İstanbul
• Cheney, A. (2006). Body brokers: inside America’s underground trade in human remains. Broadway Books: New York
• Fairfax County House (2023) Honeyline Vs. Jason
• Foucault, M. (2003). Cinselliğin Tarihi. Ayrıntı yayınları: İstanbul.
• Hardin G. (1968). The Tragedy of the Commons. Science, 13, 1243-1248.
• Hauser, C. (2023) Judge Cites 1849 Slavery Law in Ruling Embryos Can be Considered Property. https://www.nytimes.com/2023/03/16/us/virginia-slave-laws-embryos.html
• https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-64159612
• https://www.fairfaxcounty.gov/circuit/sites/circuit/files/assets/documents/pdf/opinions/cl-2021-15372-honeyhline-heidemann-v-jason-heidemann.pdf
• Kilgour, D., Gutmann, E., Matas, D. (2016) Bloody Harvest/The Slaughter. https://endtransplantabuse.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/Bloody_Harvest- The_Slaughter-2016-Update-V3-and-Addendum-20170430.pdf
• Lock, M. (2002). Twice Death: Organ Transplant and Reinvention of Death. University of California Press: London.
• Lock, M., Crowley-Makota, M. (2008). Situating The Practice of Organ Donation in Familial, Cultural, and Political Context. Transplantation Reviews, 22, 154–157
• Luck, C. (2014). The Body of Property: Antebellum American Fiction and the Phenomenology of Possession. Fordham University Press: New York https://doi.org/10.1515/9780823263028
• Marks, K. (1976). Ekonomi Politiğin Eleştirisine Katkı. Sol Yayınları: Ankara
• Marx, K. (2011) Kapital: Ekonomi Politiğin Eleştirisi¸1. Cilt. Yordam yayınları: İstanbul
• McNally, D. (2011). Monsters of the market: zombies, vampires and global capitalism. Haymarket Books: Chicago
• Montesquieu, C. d. S. (1989). The spirit of the laws (A. M. Cohler, B. C. Miller, & H. S. Stone, Eds.). Cambridge University Press: Camridge
• Mutlu, B. (2023) Duygulanımsal biyoekonomiler ve yumurta donörlerinin (görünmeyen) üreme emeği. Temasın İmkânları Değmek, Değer Üretmek, Dayanışmak içinde, ed. A. Akalın. Metis Yayınları: İstanbul
• Nancy, Scheper-Hughes. (2003). Rotten trade: Millennial capitalism, human values and global justice in organs trafficking. Journal of Human Rights, 2(2), 197-226. doi: 10.1080/1475483032000078189
• Parekh, B. C. (2013). Jeremy Bentham: Ten Critical Essays. Taylor and Francis: London&Newyork http://public.ebookcentral.proquest.com/choice/publicfullrecord.aspx?p=1111622
• Patriquin, L. (2007). Speenhamland, Settlement and the New Poor Law. In: Agrarian Capitalism and Poor Relief in England, 1500–1860. Palgrave Macmillan: London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230591387_5
• Polanyi, K. (1944). The great transformation. Farrar & Rinehart, Inc: London
• Pomeranz, K. (2000). The great divergence: China, Europe, and the making of the modern world economy. Princeton University Press: Princeton.
• Pufendorf, S. (2023). Doğal Hukuka Göre İnsanın ve Yurttaşın Ödevi. Timaş Yayınları: İstanbul
• Ragone, H. (1994). Surrogate Motherhood: Conception In the Heart. Routledge: London https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429307997
• Robespierre, M. (1792). On Subsistence Goods. https://www.marxists.org/history/france/revolution/robespierre/1792/subsistence-goods.htm
• Rousseau, J.-J., & Wootton, D. (2019). On the social contract (D. A. Cress, Trans.; Second edition). Hackett Publishing Company, Inc: Indianapolis
• Rozental, A. A. (1956). The Enclosure Movement in France. The American Journal of Economics and Sociology, 16(1), 55–71. http://www.jstor.org/stable/3484794
• Schmitt, C. (2007). The concept of the political: Expanded edition. University of Chicago Press: Chicago
• Sharp L. A. (2001). Commodified kin: death, mourning, and competing claims on the bodies of organ donors in the United States. American anthropologist, 103(1), 112–133. https://doi.org/10.1525/aa.2001.103.1.112
• Sharp, L. (1995) Organ transplantation as a transformative experience: Anthropological Insights into the Restructuring of the Self. Medical Anthropology Quarterly, 9, 357-389
• Shiva, V. (2000). Stolen Harvest: The Hijacking of the Global Food Supply. South End Press: Cambridge
• Thompson, E. P. (1993). Customs in Common. Penguin: London
• Thompson, E. P. (2016). Making of the English Working Class. Open Road Media: London