Development of Civil Literacy Scale: A Study of Validity and Reliability

Abstract

Civil literacy is a concept that enables individuals to act with an awareness about their own rights and responsibilities; to become active in civil life; and to express individual knowledge about the state's management process. Civil literacy is one of the skills that individuals should acquire in learning about the development and change of society because it demonstrates the effectiveness of individuals who have a voice and who can influence the functioning and development of the state especially in democratic societies. The purpose of this research is to develop a valid and reliable Civil Literacy Scale to measure levels of civil literacy demonstrated by pre-service teachers. The participant sample for the research was determined by a convenience sampling method from prospective teachers studying in the Faculty of Education at a university in Turkey. Exploratory factor analysis occurred on 242 pre-service teachers while a test-retest operation was conducted on 50 pre-service teachers and confirmatory factor analysis was perfomred on 231 pre-service teachers. As a result of the exploratory factor analysis, a 25-item Civil Literacy Scale emerged with a total variance value of 57.23%. The four-factor structure revealed by this analysis was confirmed by a confirmatory-factor analysis process. In the test-re-test operation, the internal consistency co-efficient was determined as .81 which is in accordance with the consistency of the scale between the first test and the re-test. According to Cronbach's Alpha reliability test (one of the reliability tests carried out for the overall and sub-dimensions of the scale) the overall scale of 25 items received a value of 0.92, which proved that the scale was highly reliable. In this context, it can be stated that a reliable and valid Civil Literacy Scale was obtained.

Keywords

• Civil literacy
• social sciences education
• scale development
• confirmatory factor analysis
• validity
• reliability

Kaynakça

1. Altun, A. (2005). Gelişen Teknolojiler ve Yeni Okuryazarlıklar. Anı Yayıncılık, Ankara.
2. Altun, A. ve Gürer, M. D. (2005). Tekli Okuryazarlıktan Çoklu Okuryazarlığa Doğru: Medya Okuryazarlığı. A. Altun ve S. Olkun (Ed.) Güncel Gelişmeler Işığında: Matematik Fen Teknoloji Yönetim (s. 177-190). Anı Yayıncılık, Ankara.
3. Aşıcı, M. (2009). Kişisel ve Sosyal Bir Değer Olarak Okuryazarlık. Değerler Eğitimi Dergisi, 7(17), 9-26.
4. Bayram, N. (2004). Sosyal Bilimlerde SPSS İle Veri Analizi, Ezgi Kitabevi, Bursa.
5. Büyüköztürk, Ş., Çakmak, E. K., Akgün, Ö. E., Karadeniz, Ş. ve Demirel, F. (2018). Bilimsel Araştırma Yöntemleri. Pegem Akademi, Ankara.
6. Can, A. (2018). SPSS ile Bilimsel Araştırma Sürecinde Nicel Veri Analizi. Pegem Akademi, Ankara.
7. Çokluk, Ö., Şekercioğlu, G., Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2018). Sosyal Bilimler İçin Çok Değişkenli İstatistik: SPSS ve LISREL Uygulamaları. Pegem Akademi, Ankara.
8. Davis, L. L. (1992). Instrumentreview: Getting the most from a panel of experts. Applied Nursing Research, 1992: 5: 194-7.

9. Fudge, D. & Skipworth, S. A. (2017). Kids in the capitol: improving civic literacy through experiential learning. Learning: Research and Practice, 3(2), 163–167. doi:10.1080/23735082.2017.1349169
10. Güneş, F. (1994). Okur-Yazarlık Kavramı ve Düzeyleri. Ankara Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 27(2), 499-507.
11. Hylton, M. E. (2018) The Role of Civic Literacy and Social Empathy on Rates of Civic Engagement Among University Students. Journal of Higher Education Outreach and Engagement, 22(1), 87-106.
12. Kellner, D. (2001), New Technologies/New Literacies: Reconstructing Education Fort He New Millenium. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 11(1), 67-81.
13. Kress, G. (2003). Literacy in the New Media Age. London: Routledge.
14. Kline, P. (2000). Handbook of Psychological Testing. Routledge.
15. Longman (2003), Dictionary of Contemporary English, Pearson Longman, UK.
16. Marsh, H. W.,Hau, K.T., Artelt, C., Baumert, J. &Peschar, J. L. (2006). “OECD’s Brief Self-Report Measure of Educational Psychology’s Most Useful Affective Constructs: Cross Cultural, Psychometric Comparisons Across 25 Countries” International Journal of Testing, 6 (4), 311–360.
17. Morgan, L. A. (2016). Developing Civic Literacy and Efficacy: Insights Gleaned through the Implementation of Project Citizen. ie: inquiry in education, 8(1), 3.
18. Stambler, L.G. (2013). Civic Literacy https://pier.macmillan.yale.edu/sites/default/files/files/Global%20Youth%20in%20the%20Digital%20Age/14_%20CIVIC%20LITERACY.pdf (14.05.2019 tarihinde erişilmiştir).
19. Thakur, G. (2011). Nurturing Civic Literacy Through BCGC. Pillai College of Education and Research, New Panvel.
20. Thoman, E. (2003). Literacy for 21st Century An Overview & Orientation Guide to Media Literacy Education, Center for Media Literacy, Santa Monica.
21. Vacca, R. T. (2002). Content Area Literacy. B. J. Guzzetti (Eds.), Literacy in America an Encyclopedia of History, Theory and Practice (s. 101-104). Santa Barbara: ABC CLIO.
22. Yılmaz, B. (1989). Okuryazarlık ve Okuma Alışkanlığı Üzerine. Türk Kütüphaneciliği, 3(1), 48-53.