The Effects of Organisatıonal Learning on Employees' Self-Efficacy and Innovation Performance

Yıl 2025, Cilt: 8 Sayı: 3, 311 - 339, 31.07.2025

Fatma Ulutürk

https://doi.org/10.33723/rs.1670517

Öz

The purpose of this study is to examine the effects of organisational learning on employees' self-efficacy and innovation performance. In this context, the research question was determined as; does organisational learning affect employees' self-efficacy and innovation performance? In this context, in this study, in order to support the university-industry cooperation and to contribute to those concerned, books, articles, theses and internet resources in the field related to the subject of the study were scanned with the semi-systematic deductive method, and comparisons were made by taking into account the similarity of content in terms of criterion suitability in the study and making comparisons by taking advantage of the results of previous researches. Within the scope of the deductive method, the research was started with a semi-systematic planning and the literature data obtained objectively and consistently were compared and analysed. For this method, research questions were determined, comparisons were made by utilising the findings of previous studies and conceptual explanations of qualitative studies and the report of the study was completed in four months.
As a result of the study, it has been observed that in enterprises that make organisational learning practices continuous, employees' self-efficacy improves and their contribution to innovation activities increases. In addition, it has been concluded that employees with an increased desire for organisational learning are highly motivated, cooperation between employees develops, they voluntarily participate in decisions related to their expertise and employees come together around common goals. On the other hand, it has been observed that taking into account psychological motivation factors as well as material motivation factors, paying attention to the demands of employees, creating solutions in a short time, meeting their requests and needs increase the self-efficacy of employees.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Experiences , Verbal Persuasion , Organisational Learning , Self-Efficacy , Innovation Performance

ÖRGÜTSEL ÖĞRENMENİN, ÇALIŞANLARIN ÖZ YETERLİLİK VE İNOVASYON PERFORMANSINA ETKİLERİ

Öz

Bu çalışmanın amacı, örgütsel öğrenmenin, çalışanların öz yeterlilik ve inovasyon performansına olan etkilerini incelemektir. Bu bağlamda araştırma sorusu; örgütsel öğrenme, çalışanların öz yeterliliklerini ve inovasyon performansını etkiler mi? şeklinde belirlenmiştir. Bu kapsamda bu çalışmada üniversite-sanayi iş birliğine destek olunması ve ilgililere katkı sağlanabilmesi amacıyla, yarı-sistematik tüm dengelim yöntemi ile çalışma konusuyla ile ilgili alandaki kitaplar, makaleler, tezler ve internet kaynakları taranmış, çalışmada kriter uygunluğu açısından içerik benzerliği dikkate alınarak ilgili daha önce yapılmış araştırma sonuçlarından yararlanarak karşılaştırmalar yapılmıştır. Tümden gelim yöntemi kapsamında, araştırmaya yarı-sistematik bir planlamayla başlanmış olup, objektif ve tutarlı bir şekilde elde edilen literatür verileri karşılaştırılarak analiz edilmiştir. Bu yöntem için çalışmada araştırma soruları belirlenmiş, daha önce yapılan araştırmaların bulguları ve niteliksel çalışmaların kavramsal açıklamalarından yararlanılarak kıyaslamalar yapılmış ve çalışmanın raporu dört ay sürecinde tamamlanmıştır.
Çalışma sonucunda örgütsel öğrenme uygulamalarını sürekli hale getiren işletmelerde çalışanların öz yeterliliklerinin geliştiği ve inovasyon faaliyetlerine katkılarının arttığı gözlemlenmiştir. Ayrıca örgütsel öğrenme isteği artan çalışanların, motivasyonlarının yüksek olduğu, çalışanları arası işbirliğinin geliştiği, uzmanlıkları ile ilgili kararlara gönüllü katıldıkları ve çalışanların ortak amaçları etrafında bir araya geldikleri sonucuna ulaşılmıştır. Diğer taraftan maddi motivasyon faktörleri kadar psikolojik motivasyon faktörlerinin de dikkate alınması, çalışanların taleplerinin önemsenmesi, çözümlerin kısa zamanda oluşturulması, istek ve ihtiyaçlarının karşılanması; çalışanlarının öz yeterliliklerini artırdığı gözlemlenmiştir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Deneyimler , Sözel İkna , Örgütsel Öğrenme , Öz Yeterlilik , İnovasyon Performansı

Kaynakça

• Adigüzel, B. (2012). İnovasyon ve İnovasyon Yönetimi: Steve Jobs Örneği (Yüksek Lisans Tezi), Ankara, Gazi Üniversitesi, Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü.
• Ahuja, G., & Katila, R. (2001). Technological acquisitions and the innovation performance of acquiring firms: A longitudinal study. Strategic Management Journal, 22(3), 197-220.
• Ali, M. A., Hussin, N., Haddad, H., Al-Araj, R., & Abed, I. A. (2021). Intellectual capital and innovation performance: Systematic literature review. Risks, 9(9), 170, 1-19. https://doi.org/10.3390/risks9090170
• Artino, A. R. (2012). Academic self-efficacy: from educational theory to instructional practice. Perspectives on Medical Education, 1, 76-85. DOI 10.1007/s40037-012-0012-5
• Ashley Braganza & John Ward, (2001), Implementing strategic innovation: Supporting people over the design and implementation boundary, Strategic Change, 10(2), 103-113. https://doi.org/10.1002/jsc.533
• Axtell, C. M., & Parker, S. K. (2003). Promoting role breadth self-efficacy through involvement, work redesign and training. Human Relations, 56(1), 113-131. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726703056001452
• Ayçin, E., & Çakın, E. (2019). Ülkelerin inovasyon performanslarının ölçümünde Entropi ve MABAC çok kriterli karar verme yöntemlerinin bütünleşik olarak kullanılması. Akdeniz İİBF Dergisi, 19(2), 326-351. https://doi.org/10.25294/auiibfd.649275
• Bakker, A. B., Tims, M., & Derks, D. (2012). Proactive personality and job performance: The role of job crafting and work engagement. Human Relations, 65, 1359–1378. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726712453471
• Bal, H. Ç., & Erkan, Ç. (2019). Industry 4.0 and competitiveness. Procedia Computer Science, 158, 625-631. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2019.09.096
• Bandura, A. (1994). Self-efficacy. In V. S. Ramachaudran (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Human Behavior. 4, 71-81. Academic Press.
• Bandura, A. (2004). Swimming against the mainstream: The early years from chilly tributary to transformative mainstream. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 42(6), 613-630. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brat.2004.02.001
• Bandura, A., & Wessels, S. (1997). Self-efficacy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Blanchard, A. L., & Henle, C. A. (2008). Correlates of different forms of cyberloafing: The role of norms and external locus of control. Computers in human behavior, 24(3), 1067-1084. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2007.03.008
• Brian H. Locke, (1976), Innovation by design, Long Range Planning, 9(4), 34- 39. Doi: 10.1049/ep.1976.0312
• Brockman, B. K., & Morgan, R. M. (2003). The role of existing knowledge in new product innovativeness and performance. Decision Sciences, 34(2), 385-419. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-5915.02326
• Cabrilo, Sladjana, Aino Kianto, & Bojana Milic. 2018. The Effect of IC Components on Innovation Performance in Serbian Companies. VINE Journal of Information and Knowledge Management Systems 48(3), 1-23. Doi:10.1108/VJIKMS-06-2016-0033
• Carliner, S. (2012), Informal Learning Basics, ASTD Press, Danvers, MA.
• Carter, W. R., Nesbit, P. L., Badham, R. J., Parker, S. K., & Sung, L. K. (2018). The effects of employee engagement and self-efficacy on job performance: a longitudinal field study. The international journal of human resource management, 29(17), 1-31. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2016.1244096
• Çiçek, B., & Almalı, V. (2020). COVID-19 Pandemisi Sürecinde Kaygı Öz-yeterlilik ve Psikolojik İyi Oluş Arasındaki İlişki: Özel Sektör ve Kamu Çalışanları Karşılaştırması. Electronic Turkish Studies, 15(4). 241-260. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.7827/TurkishStudies.43492
• David Birchall, Jean-Jacques Chanaron, George Tovstiga, & Carola Hillenbrand, (2011), Innovation performance measurement: Current practices, issues and management challenges, International Journal of Technology Management, 56(1), 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJTM.2011.042492
• Demir, C. K. (2008). Öğrenen örgütler ve terör örgütleri bağlamında PKK. Uluslararası İlişkiler Dergisi, 5(19), 57-88. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/uidergisi/issue/ 39261/462364. Erişim Tarihi: 16.02.2025.
• Demirkol, Ş. & Türkay, O. (2004). Kalite kültürünün oluşmasında eğitimin rolü. II. Kalite Sempozyumu, İzmir: Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi, s. 31-43. https://fen.deu.edu.tr/tr/ulusal-genclik-sempozyumu-2004/. Erişim Tarihi: 21.02.2025.
• Dharmadasa, P. (2009). Organisational learning, innovation and performance in family-controlled manufacturing small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) in Australia, (Doktora Tezi), Bond University.
• Elçi, Ş. (2007). İnovasyon-kalkınma ve rekabetin anahtarı (2. Baskı). İstanbul: Nova Yayınları.
• Emrah, S. S. (2013). Küçük ve orta boy işletmelerde (kobi) örgütsel öğrenme ve yenilik performansı ilişkisinin genel performansa etkileri. Yaşar Üniversitesi E-Dergisi, 8(29), 4872-4895. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/download/article-file/179383. Erişim Tarihi: 11.03.2025.
• Erdil, T. S., Aydoğan, S., Ayar, B., Güvendik, Ö., Diler, S., & Gusinac, K. (2018). İnovasyon Performansinin Rekabet Gücü, Firma Performansi ve İhracat Performansi Üzerindeki Etkisi: Birleşme Ve Satin Alma İşlemleri Üzerine Bir Araştirma. Marmara Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, 40(2), 137-166. Doi: 10.14780/muiibd.511025
• Evener, J. (2019). Organizational learning in libraries at for-profit colleges and universities: a mixed-methods analysis. Journal of Library Administration, 59(3), 1-35. https://doi.org/ 10.1080/01930826.2019.1583016.
• Fariborz Damanpour, Walker M. Richard & Claudia N. Avellaneda, (2009), Combinative effects of ınnovation types and organizational performance: a longitudinal study of service organizations, Journal of Management Studies, 46(4), 650-675. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2008.00814.x
• Feltz, D. L., Short, S. E., & Sullivan, P. J. (2008). Self-efficacy in sport. Human Kinetics.
• Garrido, M. J., & Camarero, C. (2010). Assessing the impact of organizational learning and innovation on performance in cultural organizations. International Journal of Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Marketing, 15(3), 215-232. https://doi.org/10.1002/nvsm.384 n/a-n/a.
• Grant, R. M. (1996). Toward a knowledge‐based theory of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 17(S2), 109-122. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250171110
• Gruman, J. A., & Saks, A. M. (2011). Performance management and employee engagement. Human Resource Management Review, 21(2), 123–136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2010.09.004
• Hartog, Deanne N. D., & Belschak, F.D. (2015). When does transformational leadership enhance employee proactive behavior? The role of autonomy and role breadth self-efficacy. Journal of Applied Psychology, 97(1), 194–202. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0024903
• Hatzigeorgiadis, A., Zourbanos, N., Goltsios, C., & Theodorakis, Y. (2008). Investigating the functions of self‐talk: The effects of motivational self‐ talk on self‐efficacy and performance in young tennis players. The Sport Psychologist, 22(4), 458–471. https://doi.org/10.1123/tsp.22.4.458
• Hausman, A., & Johnston, W. J. (2014). The role of innovation in driving the economy: Lessons from the global financial crisis. Journal of Business Research, 67(1), 1-7. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2013.03.021
• Hosseini, S. H., Hajipour, E., Kaffashpoor, A., & Darikandeh, A. (2020). The mediating effect of organizational culture in the relationship of leadership style with organizational learning. Journal of Human Behavior in the Social Environment, 30(3), 279-288..https://doi.org/10.1080/10911359.2019.1680473
• Huack, L., Carpenter, M., & Frank, J. (2008). Task‐specific measures of balance efficacy, anxiety, and stability and their relationship to clini‐ cal balance performance. Gait and Posture, 26, 676–682. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2007.09.002
• Işığıçok, E. (2008). Performans ölçümü, yönetimi ve istatistiksel analizi. Istanbul University Econometrics and Statistics e-Journal, (7), 1-23. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/ iuekois/issue/8988/112064, Erişim Tarihi: 22.03.2025.
• J.S. Nevid, (2013). An Introduction to Psychology, 4th Ed., Toronto: Wadswort Cencage Learning. Jiménez-Jiménez, D., & Sanz-Valle, R. (2011). Innovation, organizational learning, and performance. Journal of business research, 64(4), 408-417. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.jbusres.2010.09.010
• Kang, N., Ding, D., Van Riemsdijk, M. B., Morina, N., Neerincx, M. A., & Brinkman, W. P. (2021). Self-identification with a virtual experience and its moderating effect on self-efficacy and presence. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 37(2), 181-196. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2020.1812909
• Kıngır, S., & Mesci, M. (2007). Öğrenen organizasyonlar. Elektronik Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 6(19), 63-81. http://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/esosder/issue/6133/82256. Erişim Tarihi: 19.01.2025.
• Kostis, P. C., Kafka, K. I., & Petrakis, P. E. (2018). Cultural change and innovation performance. Journal of Business Research, 88, 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2017.12.010
• Kostopoulos, K., Papalexandris, A., Papachroni, M., & Ioannou, G. (2011). Absorptive capacity, innovation, and financial performance. Journal of Business Research, 64(12), 1-9. doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2010.12.005
• Kranz, J. J., Hanelt, A., & Kolbe, L. M. (2016). Understanding the influence of absorptive capacity and ambidexterity on the process of business model change–the case of on‐premise and cloud‐computing software. Information systems journal, 26(5), 477-517. https://doi.org/10.1111/isj.12102
• Kurt, T. (2016). Öğretmen liderliğini açıklamaya yönelik bir model: Dağıtımcı liderlik, örgütsel öğrenme ve öğretmenlerin öz yeterlik algısının öğretmen liderliğine etkisi. Eğitim ve Bilim, 41(183), 1-28. http://dx.doi.org/10.15390/EB.2016.5081
• Mahar, S. W., Basheer, S., & Maitlo, A. A. (2017). The influence of psychological capital on organization learning in banking sector of Pakistan. Review of Integrative Business and Economics Research, 6(4), 306-316. https://sibresearch.org/uploads/3/4/0/9/ 34097180/riber_6-4_23b17-124_306-316.pdf. Erişim Tarihi: 16.03.2025.
• Marsick, V. J. (2009). Toward a unifying framework to support informal learning theory, research and practice. Journal of Workplace Learning, 21(4), 265-275. Doi: 10.1108/13665620910954184
• Mazur, K. & Inkow, M. (2017). Methodological aspects of ınnovation performance measurement in the IT sector. Management, 21(2), 14-27. Doi: 10.1515/manment-2017-0002
• Muraven, M., & Baumeister, R. F. (2000). Self-regulation and depletion of limited resources: Does self-control resemble a muscle? Psychological Bulletin, 126(2), 247–259. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.126.2.247
• Özdemir, E., Altıntaş, M. H., & Kılıç, S. (2017). The effects of the degree of internationalization on export performance: a research on exporters in Turkey. Business and Economics Research Journal, 8(3), 611- 626. Doi: 10.20409/berj.2017.69
• Özdevecioğlu, M. & Biçkes D.M. (2012). Örgütsel öğrenme ve inovasyon ilişkisi: Büyük ölçekli işletmelerde bir araştırma. Erciyes Üniversitesi İktisadi Ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 39, 19-45. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/erciyesiibd /issue/5896/77949. Erişim Tarihi: 25.02.2025.
• Pajares, F., & Schunk, D. H. (2001). Self-beliefs and school success: Self-efficacy, self-concept, and and school achievement. In R. J. Riding and S. G. Rayner (Eds.), Self perception, 239–265. Ablex Publishing.
• Paul Trott, (2005), Innovation Management and New Product Development, Third Edition, England: Prentice Hall.
• Pelenk, S. E. (2017). Bireysel yenilikçilik davranışların bireysel iş performansı üzerindeki etkisi: Teknoloji çalışanları üzerinde bir araştırma. In ınternatıonal congress of management economy and polıcy proceeding book, 504-516. Recep Tayyip Erdoğan Üniversitesi, Bankacılık ve Finans Bölümü.
• Peter A. Jones & Stephen B. Baylin, (2007), The epigenomics of cancer, Cell, 128(4), 683-692, 683. https://www.cell.com/fulltext/S0092-8674(07)00127-4?large_figure=true. Erişim Tarihi: 28.03.2025.
• Peterson, S. J., & Byron, K. (2008). Exploring the role of hope in job performance: Results from four studies. Journal of Organizational Behavior: The International Journal of Industrial, Occupational and Organizational Psychology and Behavior, 29(6), 785-803. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.492
• Pinho, J. C. (2008). TQM and performance in small medium enterprises: The mediating effect of customer orientation and innovation. International Journal of Quality and Reliability Management, 25(3), 256-275. doi: 10.1108/02656710810854278
• Posch, A., & Garaus, C. (2020). Boon or curse? A contingent view on the relationship between strategic planning and organizational ambidexterity. Long Range Planning, 53(6), 101878. 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2019.03.004
• Qu, C., Ling, Y., Heynderickx, I., & Brinkman, W.-P. (2015). Virtual bystanders in a language lesson: Examining the effect of social evaluation, vicarious experience, cognitive consistency and praising on students’ beliefs, self-efficacy and anxiety in a virtual reality environment. PloS One, 10(4), e0125279. 1-26. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0125279
• Real, J. C., Roldán, J. L., & Leal, A. (2014). From entrepreneurial orientation and learning orientation to business performance: Analysing the mediating role of organizational learning and the moderating effects of organizational size. British Journal of Management, 25(2), 186-208. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8551.2012.00848.x
• Rudolph, D. L., & Butki, B. D. (1998). Self‐efficacy and affective responses to short bouts of exercise. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology, 10(2), 268–280. https://doi.org/10.1080/10413209808406393
• Schaufeli, W. B., Salanova, M., González-Romá, V., & Bakker, A. B. (2002). The measurement of engagement and burnout: A two sample confirmatory factor analytic approach. Journal of Happiness Studies, 3, 71–92. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015630930326
• Sethumadavan, D. S., Hassan, Z., & Basit, A. (2020). Enhancing ınnovation through learning organisation among the multinationals in Malaysia: Mediating role of self efficacy. International Journal of Management, Accounting and Economics, 7(11), 622-647. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenado.4335770. Erişim Tarihi: 08.04.2025.
• Sünnetçioğlu, S. (2018). Restoran işletmelerinde örgütsel öğrenme, inovasyon ve kurumsal çevrecilik arasındaki ilişkilerin incelenmesine yönelik bir araştırma. Manas Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi, 7(3). 801-821. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/mjss/issue/ 43001/520585. Erişim Tarihi: 02.04.2025.
• Tekin, E., ve Hancıoğlu, Y. (2018). İnovasyon belirleyicilerinin ihracat performansına etkisi üzerine bir araştırma. Uluslararası Yönetim İktisat ve İşletme Dergisi, 14(4), 897-917. https://doi.org/10.17130/ijmeb.2018445661
• Thelwell, R. C., & Greenlees, I. A. (2003). Developing competitive endur‐ ance performance using mental skills training. The Sport Psychologist, 17(3), 318–337. https://doi.org/10.1123/tsp.17.3.318
• Tsai, W. (2001). Knowledge transfer in intraorganizational networks: Effects of network position and absorptive capacity on business unit innovation and performance. Academy of Management Journal, 44(5), 996-1004. https://doi.org/10.5465/3069443
• Valiante, G., & Morris, D. B. (2013). The sources and maintenance of professional golfers’ self‐efficacy beliefs. The Sport Psychologist, 27, 130–142. https://doi.org/10.1123/tsp.27.2.130
• Warner, L. M., & French, D. P. (2020). Self-efficacy interventions. In M. S. Hagger, L. D. Cameron, K. Hamilton, N. Hankonen, ve T. Lintunen (Eds.), The handbook of behavior change, 461–478. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108677318.032
• Wise, J. B., & Trunnell, E. P. (2001). The influence of sources of self-efficacy upon efficacy strength. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 23(4), 268–280. https://doi.org/10.1123/jsep.23.4.268
• Wood, R., & Bandura, A. (1989). Social cognitive theory of organizational management. Academy of Management Review, 14(3), 361-384. http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp. Erişim Tarihi: 05.02.2025.
• Wright, B. J., O’Halloran, P. D., & Stukas, A. A. (2016). Enhancing self‐effi‐ cacy and performance: An experimental comparison of psychological techniques. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 87(1), 36–46. https://doi.org/10.1080/02701367.2015.1093072
• Yavuz, Ç., (2010). İşletmelerde inovasyon –performans ilişkisinin incelenmesine yönelik bir çalışma. Girişimcilik ve Kalkınma Dergisi 5(2), 144-173. https://www.ajindex. com/dosyalar/makale/acarindex-1423881655.pdf. Erişim Tarihi: 16.03.2025.
• Zheng, S., Li, H. & Wu, X. (2013). Network resources and the innovation performance: Evidence from Chinese manufacturing firms. Management Decision, 51(6), 1207-1224. Doi: 10.1108/MD-02-2012-0102
• Zimmerman, B.J., 2000. Attaining self-regulation: A social cognitive perspective. In Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 13-39). Academic press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-01210902-2/50031-7