Uzaktan Öğretim Öğrencilerinin Uzaktan Eğitime İlişkin Görüşleri, Uzaktan Eğitimde Öğrenci-Öğrenci Etkileşimine İlişkin Beklentileri Ve Topluluk Hissine İlişkin Algılarının İncelenmesi

Yıl 2024, Cilt: 8 Sayı: 1, 1 - 32, 30.06.2024

Zeynep Dikeç , Ömer Faruk İslim , İlker Yakın

https://doi.org/10.38015/sbyy.1405668

Öz

Uzaktan eğitim, zaman ve mekan sınırlaması olmaksızın bilgiye erişim sağlayarak yaygın ve sürekli öğrenme fırsatları sunar. Sayısız avantajına rağmen, sosyal etkileşimin yokluğu, çevrimiçi öğrenmede birincil engel olarak öne çıkmaktadır, çünkü bu etkileşimler öğrencilerin izolasyon ve kopukluk duygularını hafifletmede çok önemli bir rol oynayabilir. Yükseköğretimdeki mevcut eğilimler, öğrencileri yalnızca akademik gereksinimlerini karşılamada değil, aynı zamanda duygusal ve zihinsel refahlarını ele almada da desteklemeyi amaçlamaktadır. Bu çalışma, uzaktan eğitim alan ön lisans öğrencilerinin bu öğrenme biçiminin çeşitli yönlerine ilişkin bakış açılarını, diğer öğrencilerle etkileşime ilişkin beklentilerini ve topluluk hissine ilişkin algılarını araştırmayı amaçlamaktadır. Çalışmada, uzaktan eğitim programlarına kayıtlı 102 önlisans öğrencisini kapsayan kesitsel bir anket yöntemi kullanılmıştır. Bu çalışmanın bulguları, öğrencilerin uzaktan eğitimden makul düzeyde memnuniyet duyduklarını göstermektedir. Uzaktan eğitim kurslarına kayıtlı öğrenciler, çevrimiçi kursları takip ederken akranlarıyla etkileşim kurma arzusunu ifade etmektedir. Öğrenciler uzaktan eğitim alanında bir miktar topluluk duygusu yaşayabilirken, bu duygu tam olarak tatmin edici bir düzeye ulaşmayabilir. Hem uzaktan eğitimde topluluk duygusu hem de çevrimiçi derslerde öğrenci-öğrenci etkileşimi, öğrencilerin uzaktan eğitime ilişkin genel algıları üzerinde önemli ve olumlu bir etkiye sahiptir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

uzaktan eğitim, etkileşim, öğrenci beklentileri, topluluk hissi

Investigation of distance education students' opinions on distance education, their expectations on student-student interaction in distance education and their perceptions regarding the community feeling

Öz

Distance education offers opportunities for widespread and continuous learning, granting access to information without limitations of time or location. Despite its numerous advantages, the absence of social interaction stands out as a primary obstacle in online learning, as these interactions can play a pivotal role in mitigating students' feelings of isolation and disconnection. Current trends in higher education seek to support students not only in meeting their academic requirements but also in addressing their emotional and mental well-being. This study aims to investigate the perspectives of associate degree students engaged in distance education on various aspects of this mode of learning, their expectations regarding interaction with fellow students, and their perceptions of the community feeling. To conduct this study, a cross-sectional survey method was utilized, involving 102 associate degree students enrolled in distance education programs. The findings of this study suggest that students express a reasonable level of satisfaction with distance education. Students enrolled in distance education courses express a desire to engage with their peers while pursuing online courses. While students may experience some sense of community in the realm of distance education, this sense may not reach a fully satisfactory level. Both the sense of community in distance education and student-student interaction in online courses have a significant and positive impact on students' overall perceptions of distance education.

Anahtar Kelimeler

distance education, interaction, community feeling, students' expectations

Kaynakça

• Akyol, Z., Garrison, D. R. & Ozden, M. Y. (2009). Development of a community of inquiry in online and blended learning contexts. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 1(1), 1834-1838.
• Altıparmak, M., Kurt, İ. D. & Kapıdere, M. (2011). E-öğrenme ve uzaktan eğitimde açık kaynak kodlu öğrenme yönetim sistemleri. XI. Akademik Bilişim Kongresi, 4(5), 319-327.
• Anderson, T. & Dron, J. (2011). Three generations of distance education pedagogy. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 12(3), 80-97. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v12i3.890
• Arat, T. & Bakan, Ö. (2011). Uzaktan eğitim ve uygulamaları. Selçuk Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Meslek Yüksekokulu Dergisi, 14(1-2), 363-374.
• Arbaugh, J. B. (2008). Does the community of inquiry framework predict outcomes in online MBA courses?. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 9(2), 1-21.
• Arnett, T. & Waite, C. (2020). A new road map for schools. The Learning Professional, 41(3), 38-41.
• Atalmış, E. H. (2019). Tarama araştırmaları. S. Şen & İ. Yıldırım (Ed.). İçinde Eğitimde araştırma yöntemleri (97-116). Nobel Yayıncılık.
• Atieku-Boateng, H. (2021). An evaluation of the effectiveness of online education and the extent to which online education will be replacing the traditional classroom teaching. Academia Letters, Article 2806.
• Bakioğlu, A. & Can, E. (2014). Uzaktan eğitimde kalite ve akreditasyon. Vize Yayıncılık.
• Bao, W. (2020). Covid‐19 and online teaching in higher education: A case study of Peking University. Human behavior and emerging technologies, 2(2), 113-115.
• Berge, Z. L. (2002). Obstacles to distance training and education in corporate organizations. Journal of Workplace Learning, 14(5), 182-189.
• Bernard, R., Abrami, P., Borokhovski, E., Wade, C., Tamim, R., Surkes, M. & Bethel, E. (2009). A meta-analysis of three types of interaction treatments in distance education. Review of Educational Research, 79(3), 1243-1289.
• Bond, M. A., & Lockee, B. B. (2014). Building virtual communities of practice for distance educators. Springer International Publishing.
• Buckley, K. M. (2003). Evaluation of classroom-based, web-enhanced and web-based distance learning nutrition courses for undergraduate nursing. The Journal of Nursing Education 42 (8), 367–370.
• Büyüköztürk, S., Kılıç Çakmak, E., Akgün, O. E., Karadeniz, S. & Demirel, F. (2020). Bilimsel araştırma yöntemleri. 27. Baskı, Pegem Akademi Yayıncılık.
• Cairns, M. R., Ebinger, M., Stinson, C. & Jordan, J. (2020). Covid-19 and human connection: Collaborative research on loneliness and online worlds from a socially-distanced academy. Human Organization, 79(4), 281-291.
• Chen, C. Y., Chang, R. E., Hung, M. C. & Lin, M. H. (2009). Assessing the quality of a web-based learning system for nurses. Journal of Medical Systems, 33(4), 317-325.
• Chen, T., Peng, L., Yin, X., Rong, J., Yang, J. & Cong, G. (2020). Analysis of user satisfaction with online education platforms in China during the covid-19 pandemic. In Healthcare, 8(3), 200-226.
• Cinkara, E. & Bagceci, B. (2013). Learners’ attitudes towards online language learning and corresponding success rates. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 14(2), 118-130.
• Conaway, R. N., Easton, S. S. & Schmidt, W. V. (2005). Strategies for enhancing student interaction and immediacy in online courses. Business Communication Quarterly, 68(1), 23-35.
• Correia, A. & Davis, N. (2008). Intersecting communities of practice in distance education. Distance Education, 29(3), 289-306.
• Daniel, J. & Marquis, C. (1979). Interaction and independence: Getting the mixture right. Teaching at a Distance, 15, 25–44.
• Dawson, S. (2006). A study of the relationship between student communication interaction and sense of community. Internet and Higher Education, 9(3), 153-162.
• Delahunty, J., Verenikina, I. & Jones, P. (2013). Socio-emotional connections: identity, belonging and learning in online interactions. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 23(2), 243-265.
• Drouin, M. A. (2008). The relationship between students’ perceived sense of community and satisfaction, achievement and retention in an online course. Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 9(1), 267–284.
• Dumitrache, L., Stănculescu, E., Nae, M., Dumbrăveanu, D., Simion, G., Taloș, A. M. & Mareci, A. (2021). Post-Lockdown effects on students’ mental health in Romania: Perceived stress, missing daily social interactions and boredom proneness. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(16), 8599.
• Duran, H. (2020). Devletlerin koronavirüsle karşılaştırmalı mücadele stratejileri. SETA Yayınları.
• Exter, M. E., Korkmaz, N., Harlin, N. M. & Bichelmeyer, B. A. (2009). Sense of community within a fully online program: Perspectives of graduate students. Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 10(1), 177–194.
• Fraenkel, J., Wallen, N. & Hyun, H. (2012). How to design and evaluate research in education (7th ed.).
• Gallagher, K., Balt, C., Cardwell, N. & Charlebois, B. (2020). Response to covid-19 – losing and finding one another in drama: Personal geographies, digital spaces and new intimacies. Research in Drama Education: The Journal of Applied Theatre and Performance, 25(4), 638-644.
• Gallagher-Lepak, S., Reilly, J. & M Killion, C. (2009). Nursing student perceptions of community in online learning. Contemporary Nurse: A Journal for the Australian Nursing Profession, 32(1), 133–146.
• Garrison, D.R., Anderson, T. & Archer, W. (1999). Critical inquiry in a text-based environment: Computer conferencing in higher education. Internet High. Educ., 2(1), 87-105.
• Gunawardena, C.N. & McIsaac, M.S. (2004). Distance education. In: D.H. Jonassen (Ed.), Handbook of research in educational communications and technology. 2nd ed., NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, pp. 355-395.
• Gunawardena, C. N. & Zittle, F. J. (1997). Social presence as a predictor of satisfaction within a computer‐mediated conferencing environment. American Journal of Distance Education, 11(3), 8-26.
• Hillman, D. C., Willis, D. J. & Gunawardena, C. N. (1994). Learner‐interface interaction in distance education: An extension of contemporary models and strategies for practitioners. American Journal of Distance Education, 8(2), 30-42.
• Houghton, S., Kyron, M., Hunter, S. C., Lawrence, D., Hattie, J., Carroll, A. & Zadow, C. (2022). Adolescents' longitudinal trajectories of mental health and loneliness: The impact of covid‐19 school closures. Journal of Adolescence, 94(2), 191-205.
• Hulon, S. (2013). Face-to-face discussions versus online threaded discussions: Can we have the best of both worlds? In Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference 1(1), 577–582.
• Ilgaz, H. & Aşkar, P. (2009). Çevrimiçi uzaktan eğitim ortamında topluluk hissi ölçeği geliştirme çalışması. Turkish Journal of Computer and Mathematics Education (TURCOMAT), 1(1), 27-34.
• İşman, A., Demiray, U. & Barkan, M. (Eds.). (2005). Distance Education: The Winds Of Change. Sempati.
• Kassim, S. F. M., Rahim, N. B. & Hilmi, M. F. (2023). Examining the influence of interaction on student satisfaction via flow experience among distance learners in Malaysia. International Journal of Modern Education, 5(17), 139-157.
• Kauffman, H. (2015). A review of predictive factors of student success in and satisfaction with online learning. Research in Learning Technology, 23(1), 1-13.
• Kearsely, G. (1995). The nature and value of interaction in distance learning. Distance Education, 12, 83-92.
• Knight, H., Carlisle, S., O’Connor, M., Briggs, L., Fothergill, L., Al-Oraibi, A., Blake, H. (2021). Impacts of the COVID-19 Pandemic and self-ısolation on students and staff in higher education: A qualitative study. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(20), 10675. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph182010675
• Kurucay, M. & Inan, F. A. (2017). Examining the effects of learner-learner interactions on satisfaction and learning in an online undergraduate course. Computers & Education, 115, 20-37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2017.06.010.
• Labrague, L. J., De los Santos, J. A. A. & Falguera, C. (2021). Social and emotional loneliness among college students during the covid-19 pandemic: The predictive role of coping behaviours, social support and personal resilience. Perspectives in Psychiatric Care 57(1), 1578–1584.
• Larson, B. E. & Keiper, T. A. (2002). Classroom discussion and threaded electronic discussion: Learning in two arenas. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 2(1), 45– 62.
• Liu, C., McCabe, M., Dawson, A., Cyrzon, C., Shankar, S., Gerges, N., ... & Cornish, K. (2021). Identifying predictors of university students’ wellbeing during the covid-19 pandemic—A data-driven approach. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(13), 6730.
• Liu, X., Magjuka, R. J., Bonk, C. J. & Lee, S. (2007). Does sense of community matter? An examination of participants’ perceptions of building learning communities in online courses. The Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 8(1), 9-24.
• Masino, M. (2015). Integration of Blackboard in the online learning environment. Journal of Instructional Pedagogies, 16(1), 1-10.
• McAllister, M., Wynaden, D., Happell, B., Flynn, T., Walters, V., Duggan, R., ... & Gaskin, C. (2014). Staff experiences of providing support to students who are managing mental health challenges: A qualitative study from two Australian universities. Advances in Mental Health, 12(3), 192-201.
• Mehrotra, C., Hollister, C. D. & McGahey, L. (2001). Distance learning: Principles for effective design, delivery and evaluation. Sage Publications.
• Moore, G. E. Warner, W. J. & Jones, D. W. (2016). Student-to-student ınteraction in distance education classes: What do graduate students want?. Journal of Agricultural Education, 57(2), 1-13.
• Moore, J. (2014). Effects of online interaction and instructor presence on students’ satisfaction and success with online undergraduate public relations courses. Journalism & Mass Communication Educator, 69(3), 271-288.
• Moore, M.G. (1989). Three types of interaction. American Journal of Distance Education 3(2), 1–6.
• Moore, M. G. & Kearsley, G. (2012). Distance education: A systems view (3th ed.). Wadsworth Publishing.
• Moore, R. (2014). Importance of developing community in distance education courses. Techtrends: Linking Research & Practice to Improve Learning, 58(2), 20-24.
• Muilenburg, L. Y. & Berge, Z. L. (2005). Student barriers to online learning: A factor analytic study. Distance Education, 26(1), 29-48.
• Nearchou, F., Flinn, C., Niland, R., Subramaniam, S. S. & Hennessy, E. (2020). Exploring the impact of covid-19 on mental health outcomes in children and adolescents: a systematic review. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(22), 8479.
• Nieuwoudt, J. (2018). Exploring online interaction and online learner participation in an online science subject through the lens of the interaction equivalence theorem. Student Success, 9(4), 53-62.
• Odabaş, H. (2003). İnternet tabanlı uzaktan eğitim ve bilgi ve belge yönetimi. Türk Kütüphaneciliği, 17(1), 22-36.
• Palloff, R. M. & Pratt, K. (2007). Building online learning communities: Effective strategies for the virtual classroom. John Wiley & Sons.
• Park, C. & Kim, D. G. (2020). Perception of instructor presence and its effects on learning experience in online classes. Journal of Information Technology Education: Research, 19(1), 475-488. https://doi.org/10.28945/4611
• Patton, M. Q. (2014). Qualitative research & evaluation methods: Integrating theory and practice. Sage Publications.
• Perrotta, C. (2006). Learning to be a psychologist: The construction of identity in an online forum. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 22(6), 456-466.
• Piazza, R. & Rizzari, S. (2020). Sviluppo delle competenze professionali e qualità della didattica universitaria: La peer review come formazione partecipata. Form@ re-Open Journal Per la Formazione in Rete, 20(1), 62-77.
• Pietrabissa, G. & Simpson, S. G. (2020). Psychological consequences of social isolation during covid-19 outbreak. Frontiers in Psychology, 11(1), 2201. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.02201
• Poalses, J. & Bezuidenhout, A. (2018). Mental health in higher education: A comparative stress risk assessment at an open distance learning university in South Africa. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 19(2) 169-191. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v19i2.3391
• Pollock, K. (2020). school leaders’ work during the covid-19 pandemic: A two-pronged approach. International Studies in Education, 48(3), 38-44.
• Pregowska, A., Masztalerz, K., Garlińska, M. & Osial, M. (2021). A worldwide journey through distance education—from the post office to virtual, augmented and mixed realities and education during the covid-19 pandemic. Education Sciences, 11(3), 118-144.
• Purarjomandlangrudi, A., Chen, D. & Nguyen, A. (2016). Investigating the drivers of student interaction and engagement in online courses: A study of state-of-the-art. Informatics in Education, 15(2), 269-286.
• Reisetter, M. & Boris, G. (2004). What works: Student perceptions of effective elements in online learning. Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 5(4), 277-291.
• Rippé, C. B., Weisfeld-Spolter, S., Yurova, Y. & Kemp, A. (2021). Pandemic pedagogy for the new normal: Fostering perceived control during COVID-19. Journal of Marketing Education, 43(2), 260-276.
• Roberts, E. & Lund, J. (2007). Exploring e-learning community in a global postgraduate programme. SAGE Publications Ltd. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781848607859
• Rovai, A. P. (2002). Building sense of community at a distance. The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 3(1), 1-16.
• Rovai, A., Wighting, M. & Lucking, R. (2004). The classroom and school community inventory. Internet and Higher Education, 7(4), 263-280.
• Saba, F. (2000). Research in distance education: A status report. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 1(1), 1-9.
• Sadeghi, M. (2019). A shift from classroom to distance learning: Advantages and limitations. International Journal of Research in English Education, 4(1), 80-88.
• Sadera, W. A., Robertson, J., Song, L. & Midon, M. N. (2009). The role of community in online learning success. Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 5(2), 277-285.
• Sae-Khow, J. (2014). Developing of ındicators of an e-learning benchmarking model for higher education ınstitutions. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 13(1), 35-43.
• Santos, L. & Reeve, R. (2020). Screen time and youth health issues: A literature review. International Journal of E-Learning & Distance Education, 35(1), 1-26.
• Sarı, Y. E. (2021). Uzaktan eğitimde etkili iletişim ve iletişimsel engeller: Sözlü ve sözsüz iletişim. Diyalog Interkulturelle Zeitschrift Für Germanistik, 9(2), 659-671.
• Shea, P. (2006). A study of students’ sense of learning community in online environments. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 10(1), 35-44.
• Shea, P., Li, C. S. & Pickett, A. (2006). A study of teaching presence and student sense of learning community in fully online and web-enhanced college courses. Internet and Higher Education, 9(3), 175-190.
• Shea, P. & Bidjerano, T. (2009). Community of inquiry as a theoretical framework to foster "epistemic engagement" and "cognitive presence" in online education. Computers & Education, 52(3), 543-553.
• Shoufan, A. (2019). What motivates university students to like or dislike an educational online video? A sentimental framework. Computers & Education, 134(1), 132-144.
• Simonson, M., Schlosser, C. & Orellana, A. (2011). Distance education research: A review of the literature. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 23(2), 124-142.
• Son, C., Hegde, S., Smith, A., Wang, X, & Sasangohar, F. (2020). Effects of covid-19 on college students’ mental health in the United States: Interview survey study. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 22(9), e21279.
• Swan, K. (2002). Building learning communities in online courses: The importance of interaction. Education, Communication & Information, 2(1), 23-49.
• Telli, S. G. & Altun, D. (2020). Coronavirüs ve çevrimiçi (online) eğitimin önlenemeyen yükselişi. Üniversite Araştırmaları Dergisi, 3(1), 25-34.
• Toquero, C. M. (2020). Challenges and opportunities for higher education amid the covid-19 Pandemic: The Philippine context. Pedagogical Research, 5(4), em0063. https://doi.org/10.29333/pr/7947
• Traxler, J. (2018). Distance learning—Predictions and possibilities. Education Sciences, 8(1), 35.
• Tryon, P. J. & Bishop, M. (2009). Theoretical foundations for enhancing social connectedness in online learning environments. Distance Education, 30(3), 291−315. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587910903236312
• Tucker, S. (2001). Distance education: Better, worse, or as good as traditional education. Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration, 4(4), 1-6.
• Türküresin, H. E. (2020). Covid-19 pandemi döneminde yürütülen uzaktan eğitim uygulamalarının öğretmen adaylarının görüşleri bağlamında incelenmesi. Milli Eğitim Dergisi, 49(1), 597-618.
• Ustati, R. & Hassan, S. S. S. (2013). Distance learning students’ need: Evaluating interactions from Moore’s theory of transactional distance. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 14(2), 292-304.
• Uzun, A. M., Ünal, E. & Yamaç, A. (2013). Service teachers' academic achievements in online distance education: the roles of online self-regulation and attitudes. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education- TOJDE, 14(2), 131-140.
• Vaillancourt, T., McDougall, P., Comeau, J. & Finn, C. (2021). Covid-19 school closures and social isolation in children and youth: Prioritizing relationships in education. Facets, 6(1), 1795-1813.
• Wagner, E. D. (1994). In support of a functional definition of interaction. The American Journal of Distance Education, 8(2), 6–29.
• Wise, A., Duffy, T. & Padmanabhan, P. (2008). Deepening online conversation. Educational Technology, 48(4), 3-11.
• Yang, C. & Chang, Y. S. (2012). Assessing the effects of interactive blogging on student attitudes towards peer interaction, learning motivation and academic achievements. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 28(2), 126-135.
• Yıldırım, S., Yıldırım, G., Çelik, E. & Karaman, S. (2014). Uzaktan eğitim öğrencilerinin uzaktan eğitime yönelik görüşleri: Bir ölçek geliştirme çalışması. Eğitim ve Öğretim Araştırmaları Dergisi, 3(3), 365-370.
• Yu, J., Huang, C., Han, Z., He, T. & Li, M. (2020). Investigating the influence of interaction on learning persistence in online settings: Moderation or mediation of academic emotions?. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(7), 2320.
• Zheng, L. & Smaldino, S. (2003). Key instructional design elements for distance education. The Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 4 (2), 153-166.