SOSYAL YERLEŞİKLİK KURAMI ÇERÇEVESİNDE İŞ İNSANLARININ SOSYAL AĞLARA KATILIM GEREKÇELERİNE DAİR LİTERATÜRDEKİ TARTIŞMALAR

Öz

Ağ düzenekleri içerisine yerleşik örgütlerin, bu sisteme dahil olmayan örgütlerin sahip olamayacağı kaynak ve bilgilere ulaşabileceği literatürde tartışılan konulardan biridir. Örgüt teorisi literatüründe, örgütlerin ağlara katılma nedenleri tartışılagelmiştir. Bu çalışmada, iş insanlarının bulundukları sosyal ağların yerleşik olunan bağlamdan etkilenen özgün niteliklerinin olup olmadığının ve iş insanlarının bu ağlara katılma nedenlerine dair literatürdeki tartışmaların tespit edilmesi hedeflenmektedir. Bu çalışmada örgütsel alanda örgütün içinde bulunduğu ağ düzeneklerine dair oluşan geniş yazına dayanarak, girişimci aktörlerin bu ağlar içinde bulunma nedenlerine yönelik tartışmaların tespiti amaçlanmıştır. Örgütsel ağlara katılım nedenlerine ilişkin yapılan yazın taraması sonucu, sosyal ağların nitelikleri, işlevleri ve kişilerin bu ağlara katılım nedenleri veya gerekçelerine ilişkin birçok tartışmalar olduğu ortaya koymuştur. Bu çerçevede ilk olarak, iş insanlarının dahil oldukları sosyal ağlar ile rekabet avantajı sağlayacak üstünlükler elde ettikleri, örgütler açısından kritik nitelikli kaynaklara ulaşmak konusunda üstünlük sağladıkları savı öne sürülmektedir. İkinci olarak da sosyal ağların yerleşikliği ve iş insanlarının içinde yaşadıkları kültürel ve kurumsal bağlamın bu ağ yapıları ve ilişkilerine etkisi kritik bir araştırma sorunsalını oluşturmaktadır. Araştırmamızda girişimcilerin hangi temel saiklerle ağlara katıldıklarına yönelik tartışmalar tespit edilmiştir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Yerleşiklik
• Sosyal Yerleşiklik
• Sosyal Ağlar

Discussions in the Literature on the Reasons for Participation of Business People in Social Networks within the Framework of Social Embeddedness Theory

Öz

It is one of the issues discussed in the literature that organizations embedded in network mechanisms can access resources and information that organizations not included in this system can not have. In the organizational theory literature, the reasons for organizations to join networks have been discussed. In this study, it is aimed to determine whether the social networks of business people have unique characteristics that are affected by the context in which they are located and the discussions in the literature about the reasons for business people to join these networks. In this study, it is aimed to determine the debates about the reasons for entrepreneurial actors to be in these networks, based on the extensive literature on the network mechanisms in the organizational field. As a result of the literature review on the reasons for participation in organizational networks, it has been revealed that there are many discussions about the characteristics and functions of social networks and the reasons or reasons for people's participation in these networks. In this framework, firstly, it is argued that business people gain advantages that will provide competitive advantage with the social networks they are involved in, and that they gain superiority in accessing critical resources for organizations. Secondly, the resilience of social networks and the impact of the cultural and institutional context in which business people live on these network structures and relations constitute a critical research problem. In our research, discussions on the main motivations of entrepreneurs participating in networks have been identified.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Embeddedness
• Social Embeddedness
• Social Networks

Kaynakça

1. Achrol, R.S. ve Kotler, P. (1999). Marketing In The Network Economy. Journal of Marketing, 63, 146-163.
2. Achrol, R.S. ve Kotler, P. (1999). Marketing In The Network Economy. Journal of Marketing, 63, 146-163.
3. Adler, P. ve Kwon, S. W. (2002). Social Capital: Prospects for a New Concept. Academy of Management Review, 27(1), 17-40.
4. Adler, P. ve Kwon, S. W. (2002). Social Capital: Prospects for a New Concept. Academy of Management Review, 27(1), 17-40.
5. Ahuja, G. (2000). Collaboration Networks, Structural Holes, and Innovation: A Longitudinal Study. Administrative Science Quarterly, 45(3), 425-455.
6. Ahuja, G. (2000). Collaboration Networks, Structural Holes, and Innovation: A Longitudinal Study. Administrative Science Quarterly, 45(3), 425-455.
7. Alter, C. ve Hage, J. Organizations Working Together, London: Sage.
8. Alter, C. ve Hage, J. Organizations Working Together, London: Sage.

9. Barney, J. B. ve Hansen, M. H. (1994). Trustworthiness as a Source of Competitive Advantage. Strategic Management Journal, 15, 175-190.
10. Barney, J. B. ve Hansen, M. H. (1994). Trustworthiness as a Source of Competitive Advantage. Strategic Management Journal, 15, 175-190.
11. Baum, J. A. C. ve Oliver, C. (1991). Institutional Linkages and Organizational Mortality. Administrative Science Quarterly, 36(2), 187-218.
12. Baum, J. A. C. ve Oliver, C. (1991). Institutional Linkages and Organizational Mortality. Administrative Science Quarterly, 36(2), 187-218.
13. Batjargal, B. (2007). Comparative Social Capital: Networks of Entrepreneurs and Venture Capitalists in China and Russia. Management and Organization Review, 3(3), 397-419.
14. Batjargal, B. (2007). Comparative Social Capital: Networks of Entrepreneurs and Venture Capitalists in China and Russia. Management and Organization Review, 3(3), 397-419.
15. Belen, E. (2015). Networking – Tanışma, Tanıştırma, Tanıtma Sanatı (21. Baskı). İstanbul: Optimist Yayınları.
16. Belen, E. (2015). Networking – Tanışma, Tanıştırma, Tanıtma Sanatı (21. Baskı). İstanbul: Optimist Yayınları.
17. Birley, S., Cromie, S. ve Myers, A. Entrepreneurial Networks: Their Creation and Development in Different Countries. International Small Business Journal, 1-36.
18. Birley, S., Cromie, S. ve Myers, A. Entrepreneurial Networks: Their Creation and Development in Different Countries. International Small Business Journal, 1-36.
19. Bikmen, F. ve Meydanoğlu, Z. (2006). Türkiye’de Sivil Toplum Bir Değişim Süreci, Uluslararası Sivil Toplum Endeksi Projesi, Türkiye Ülke Raporu, İstanbul: Tüsev Yayınları.
20. Bikmen, F. ve Meydanoğlu, Z. (2006). Türkiye’de Sivil Toplum Bir Değişim Süreci, Uluslararası Sivil Toplum Endeksi Projesi, Türkiye Ülke Raporu, İstanbul: Tüsev Yayınları.
21. Borgatti, S. P. ve Cross, R. (2003). A Relational View of Information Seeking and Learning in Social Networks. Management Science, 49(4), 432-445.
22. Borgatti, S. P. ve Cross, R. (2003). A Relational View of Information Seeking and Learning in Social Networks. Management Science, 49(4), 432-445.
23. Brass, D. J., Galaskiewicz, J. J., Greve, H. R. ve Tsai, W. (2004). Taking Stock of Networks and Organizations: A Multilevel Perspective. Academy of Management Journal, 47(6), 795-817.
24. Brass, D. J., Galaskiewicz, J. J., Greve, H. R. ve Tsai, W. (2004). Taking Stock of Networks and Organizations: A Multilevel Perspective. Academy of Management Journal, 47(6), 795-817.
25. Buğra, A. (1994). State and Business in Modern Turkey: A Comparative Study. The American Journal of Sociology, 100(3), 1-332.
26. Buğra, A. (1994). State and Business in Modern Turkey: A Comparative Study. The American Journal of Sociology, 100(3), 1-332.
27. Buğra, A. (2008). Devlet ve İş adamları (6. Baskı). Çev., Adaman F., İstanbul: İletişim Yayınları.
28. Buğra, A. (2008). Devlet ve İş adamları (6. Baskı). Çev., Adaman F., İstanbul: İletişim Yayınları.
29. Burt, R. S. (1992). Structural Holes: The Social Structure of Competition. Harvard University Press.
30. Burt, R. S. (1992). Structural Holes: The Social Structure of Competition. Harvard University Press.
31. Burt, R. S. (1997). A Note on Social Capital and Network Content. Social Networks, 19, 355-374.
32. Burt, R. S. (1997). A Note on Social Capital and Network Content. Social Networks, 19, 355-374.
33. Canbolat, E. Ö. (2010). Örgütlerin İçinde Bulunduğu Ağ Şebekelerindeki Konumlarının Örgütsel Alandaki Eşbiçimliliğe Etkisi. Organizasyon ve Yönetim Bilimleri Dergisi, 2(1), 1-9.
34. Canbolat, E. Ö. (2010). Örgütlerin İçinde Bulunduğu Ağ Şebekelerindeki Konumlarının Örgütsel Alandaki Eşbiçimliliğe Etkisi. Organizasyon ve Yönetim Bilimleri Dergisi, 2(1), 1-9.
35. Chell, E. ve Baines, S. (2000). Networking, Entrepreneurship and Microbusiness Behaviour. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 12, 195-215.
36. Chell, E. ve Baines, S. (2000). Networking, Entrepreneurship and Microbusiness Behaviour. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 12, 195-215.
37. Chu, P. (1996). Social Network Models of Overseas Chinese Entrepreneurship: The Experience of Hong Kong and Canada. Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences, 13(4), 358-365.
38. Chu, P. (1996). Social Network Models of Overseas Chinese Entrepreneurship: The Experience of Hong Kong and Canada. Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences, 13(4), 358-365.
39. Coleman, J. S. (1988). Social Capital in the Creation of Human Capital. American Journal of Sociology, 94, 95-120.
40. Coleman, J. S. (1988). Social Capital in the Creation of Human Capital. American Journal of Sociology, 94, 95-120.
41. Coleman, J. S. (1990). Foundations of Social Theory. London: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
42. Coleman, J. S. (1990). Foundations of Social Theory. London: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
43. Çitçi, U. S. ve Coşkun, R. (2012). Sosyal Ağ Kullanımında Süreç Yaklaşımı: Girişimcilerin Sosyal Ağları Kullanımında Farklılaşmanın Değerlendirilmesi. Selçuk Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 12(23), 125-156.
44. Çitçi, U. S. ve Coşkun, R. (2012). Sosyal Ağ Kullanımında Süreç Yaklaşımı: Girişimcilerin Sosyal Ağları Kullanımında Farklılaşmanın Değerlendirilmesi. Selçuk Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 12(23), 125-156.
45. Dahl, M. S. ve Sorenson, O. (2014). The Who, Why and How of Spinoffs. Industrial and Corporate Change, 23(3), 661-688.
46. Dahl, M. S. ve Sorenson, O. (2014). The Who, Why and How of Spinoffs. Industrial and Corporate Change, 23(3), 661-688.
47. Dequech, D. (2003). Cognitive and Cultural Embeddedness: Combining Institutional Economics and Economic Sociology. Journal of Economic Issues, 37(2), 461-470.
48. Dequech, D. (2003). Cognitive and Cultural Embeddedness: Combining Institutional Economics and Economic Sociology. Journal of Economic Issues, 37(2), 461-470.
49. DiMaggio, R J. (1994). Culture and economy. In N. J. Smelser and R. Swedberg (eds.), Handbook of Economic Sociology: 27-57. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
50. DiMaggio, R J. (1994). Culture and economy. In N. J. Smelser and R. Swedberg (eds.), Handbook of Economic Sociology: 27-57. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
51. Dirlik, O. (2016). Türk İş Sisteminin Evrimi: Makro Kurumsal Bir İnceleme. Yönetim ve Organizasyon Araştırmaları Dergisi, 1(2), 5-30.
52. Dirlik, O. (2016). Türk İş Sisteminin Evrimi: Makro Kurumsal Bir İnceleme. Yönetim ve Organizasyon Araştırmaları Dergisi, 1(2), 5-30.
53. Dodd, S., Jack, S. ve Anderson, A. R. (2002). Scottish Entrepreneurial Networks in the International Context. International Small Business Journal, 20(2), 213-219.
54. Dodd, S., Jack, S. ve Anderson, A. R. (2002). Scottish Entrepreneurial Networks in the International Context. International Small Business Journal, 20(2), 213-219.
55. Dowling, J. ve Pfeffer, J. (1975). Organizational Legitimacy: Social Values and Organizational Behavior. The Pacific Sociological Review, 18(1), 122-136.
56. Dowling, J. ve Pfeffer, J. (1975). Organizational Legitimacy: Social Values and Organizational Behavior. The Pacific Sociological Review, 18(1), 122-136.
57. Dyer, J. H. ve Singh, H. (1998). The Relational View: Cooperative Strategy and Sources of Interorganizational Competitive Advantage. The Academy of Management Review, 23(4), 660-679.
58. Dyer, J. H. ve Singh, H. (1998). The Relational View: Cooperative Strategy and Sources of Interorganizational Competitive Advantage. The Academy of Management Review, 23(4), 660-679.
59. Freeman, L. C. (1979). Centrality in Social Networks: Conceptual Clarification. Social Networks, 1(3), 215-239.
60. Freeman, L. C. (1979). Centrality in Social Networks: Conceptual Clarification. Social Networks, 1(3), 215-239.
61. Fukuyama, F. (1998). Güven: Sosyal Erdemler ve Refahın Yaratılması, Ankara: Türkiye İş Bankası Yayınları.
62. Fukuyama, F. (1998). Güven: Sosyal Erdemler ve Refahın Yaratılması, Ankara: Türkiye İş Bankası Yayınları.
63. Gargiulo, M. ve Benassi, M. (2000). Trapped in Your Own Net? Network Cohesion, Structural Holes and the Adaptation of Social Capital. Organizaiton Sicence, 11(2), 183-196.
64. Gargiulo, M. ve Benassi, M. (2000). Trapped in Your Own Net? Network Cohesion, Structural Holes and the Adaptation of Social Capital. Organizaiton Sicence, 11(2), 183-196.
65. Gnyawali, D. R. ve Madhavan, R. (2001). Cooperative Networks and Competitive Dynamics: A Structural Embeddedness Perspective. Academy of Management Review, 26(3), 431-445.
66. Gnyawali, D. R. ve Madhavan, R. (2001). Cooperative Networks and Competitive Dynamics: A Structural Embeddedness Perspective. Academy of Management Review, 26(3), 431-445.
67. Gökalp, N. (2003). Ekonomide Güven Faktörü. Yönetim ve Ekonomi, 10(2), 163-174.
68. Gökalp, N. (2003). Ekonomide Güven Faktörü. Yönetim ve Ekonomi, 10(2), 163-174.
69. Gökşen, N. S. ve Üsdiken, B. (2001). Uniformity and Diversity in Turkish Business Groups: Effects of Scale and Time of Founding. British Journal of Management, 12, 325–340.
70. Gökşen, N. S. ve Üsdiken, B. (2001). Uniformity and Diversity in Turkish Business Groups: Effects of Scale and Time of Founding. British Journal of Management, 12, 325–340.
71. Grandori, A. ve Soda, G. (1995). Inter-Firm Networks: Antecedents, Mechanisms and Forms. Organization Studies, 16(2), 183-214.
72. Grandori, A. ve Soda, G. (1995). Inter-Firm Networks: Antecedents, Mechanisms and Forms. Organization Studies, 16(2), 183-214.
73. Granovetter, M. S. (1973). The Strenght of Weak Ties. The American Journal of Sociology, 78(6), 1360-1380.
74. Granovetter, M. S. (1973). The Strenght of Weak Ties. The American Journal of Sociology, 78(6), 1360-1380.
75. Granovetter, M. (1985). Economic Action and Social Structure: The Problem of Embeddedness. American Journal of Sociology, 91(3), 481-510.
76. Granovetter, M. (1985). Economic Action and Social Structure: The Problem of Embeddedness. American Journal of Sociology, 91(3), 481-510.
77. Gray, B. ve Wood, D.J. (1991). Collaborative Alliances: Moving from Pratice to Theory. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 27(1), 3-22.
78. Gray, B. ve Wood, D.J. (1991). Collaborative Alliances: Moving from Pratice to Theory. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 27(1), 3-22.
79. Gulati, R. (1998). Alliances and Networks. Strategic Management Journal, 19(4), 293-317.
80. Gulati, R. (1998). Alliances and Networks. Strategic Management Journal, 19(4), 293-317.
81. Gulati, R. (1999). Network Location and Learning: The Influence of Network Resources and Firm Capabilities on Alliance Formation. Strategic Management Journal, 20(5), 397-420.
82. Gulati, R. (1999). Network Location and Learning: The Influence of Network Resources and Firm Capabilities on Alliance Formation. Strategic Management Journal, 20(5), 397-420.
83. Gulati, R. ve Gargiulo, M. (1999). Where Do Interorganizational Networks Come From?. American Journal of Sociology, 104(5), 1439-1493.
84. Gulati, R. ve Gargiulo, M. (1999). Where Do Interorganizational Networks Come From?. American Journal of Sociology, 104(5), 1439-1493.
85. Gulati, R., Nohria, N. ve Zaheer, A. (2000). Strategic Networks. Strategic Management Journal, 21(3), 203-215.
86. Gulati, R., Nohria, N. ve Zaheer, A. (2000). Strategic Networks. Strategic Management Journal, 21(3), 203-215.
87. Hoang, H. ve Antoncic, B. (2003). Network-Based Research in Entrepreneurship: A Critical Review. Journal of Business Venturing, 18(2), 165-187.
88. Hoang, H. ve Antoncic, B. (2003). Network-Based Research in Entrepreneurship: A Critical Review. Journal of Business Venturing, 18(2), 165-187.
89. Hofstede, G. (1980). Culture’s consequences: international differences in work-related values, Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
90. Hofstede, G. (1980). Culture’s consequences: international differences in work-related values, Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
91. Halinen, A. ve Törnroos, J A. (1998). The Role of Embeddedness in the Evolution of Business Networks. Scandinav Journal Management, 14(3), 187-205.
92. Halinen, A. ve Törnroos, J A. (1998). The Role of Embeddedness in the Evolution of Business Networks. Scandinav Journal Management, 14(3), 187-205.
93. Hinterhuber, H. H. ve Hirsch, A. (1998). Starting Up a Strategic Network. Thunderbird International Business Review, 40(3), 185-207.
94. Hinterhuber, H. H. ve Hirsch, A. (1998). Starting Up a Strategic Network. Thunderbird International Business Review, 40(3), 185-207.
95. Huggins, R. (2000). The Success and Failure of Policy-implanted Inter-firm Network Initiatives: Motivations, Processes and Structure. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 12(2), 11-135.
96. Huggins, R. (2000). The Success and Failure of Policy-implanted Inter-firm Network Initiatives: Motivations, Processes and Structure. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 12(2), 11-135.
97. Ibarra, H. ve Hunter, M. L. (2007). How Leaders Create and Use Networks. Harvard Business Review, 85(1), 40-47.
98. Ibarra, H. ve Hunter, M. L. (2007). How Leaders Create and Use Networks. Harvard Business Review, 85(1), 40-47.
99. Jack, S. ve Anderson, R. A. (2002). The Effect of Embeddednes on the Entrepreneurial Process. Journal of Business Venturing, 17, 467-487.
100. Jack, S. ve Anderson, R. A. (2002). The Effect of Embeddednes on the Entrepreneurial Process. Journal of Business Venturing, 17, 467-487.
101. Jaklic, M, (1998). Internationalization Strategies, Networking and Functional Discretion. Competition & Change, 3(4), 359-385.
102. Jaklic, M, (1998). Internationalization Strategies, Networking and Functional Discretion. Competition & Change, 3(4), 359-385.
103. Jarillo, C. J. (1988). On Strategic Networks. Strategic Management Journal, 9(1), 31-41.
104. Jarillo, C. J. (1988). On Strategic Networks. Strategic Management Journal, 9(1), 31-41.
105. Jones, C., Hesterly, W. ve Borgatti, S. P. (1997). A General Theory of Network Governance: Exchange Conditions and Social Mechanisms. Academy of Management Review, 22(4), 911-945.
106. Jones, C., Hesterly, W. ve Borgatti, S. P. (1997). A General Theory of Network Governance: Exchange Conditions and Social Mechanisms. Academy of Management Review, 22(4), 911-945.
107. Kantur, D. (2017). Sosyal Girişimcilikte Yerleşiklik: Coğrafi Yayılım ve Kültürel Değerlerin Rolü. Girişimcilik ve İnovasyon Yönetimi Dergisi, 6(1), 173-196.
108. Kantur, D. (2017). Sosyal Girişimcilikte Yerleşiklik: Coğrafi Yayılım ve Kültürel Değerlerin Rolü. Girişimcilik ve İnovasyon Yönetimi Dergisi, 6(1), 173-196.
109. Karagül, M. ve Masca, M. (2005). Sosyal Sermaye Üzerine Bir İnceleme. Ekonomik ve Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi, Bahar, 37-52.
110. Karagül, M. ve Masca, M. (2005). Sosyal Sermaye Üzerine Bir İnceleme. Ekonomik ve Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi, Bahar, 37-52.
111. Kenis, P. ve Oerlemans, L. (2007). The Social Network Perspective: Understanding the Structure of Cooperation. The Oxford Handbook of Inter-Organizational Relations, Oxford University Press, December, 289-312.
112. Kenis, P. ve Oerlemans, L. (2007). The Social Network Perspective: Understanding the Structure of Cooperation. The Oxford Handbook of Inter-Organizational Relations, Oxford University Press, December, 289-312.
113. Kilduff, M. ve Brass, D. (2010). Organizational Social Network Research: Core Ideas and Key Debates. The Academy of Management Annals, 4(1), 317-357.
114. Kilduff, M. ve Brass, D. (2010). Organizational Social Network Research: Core Ideas and Key Debates. The Academy of Management Annals, 4(1), 317-357.
115. Koç, V. (1983). Hayat Hikayem (4. Baskı), İstanbul: Apa Ofset.
116. Koç, V. (1983). Hayat Hikayem (4. Baskı), İstanbul: Apa Ofset.
117. Kozan, K. M. ve Akdeniz, L. (2014). Role of Strong versus Weak Networks in Small Business Growth in an Emerging Economy. Administrative Sciences, 4, 35-50.
118. Kozan, K. M. ve Akdeniz, L. (2014). Role of Strong versus Weak Networks in Small Business Growth in an Emerging Economy. Administrative Sciences, 4, 35-50.
119. Lin, N. (1999). Building a Network Theory of Social Capital. Connections, 22(1), 28-51.
120. Lin, N. (1999). Building a Network Theory of Social Capital. Connections, 22(1), 28-51.
121. Lin, M. H. (2006). Interorganizational Collaboration, Social Embeddedness, and Value Creation: A Theoretical Analysis. International Journal of Management, 23(3), 548-558.
122. Lin, M. H. (2006). Interorganizational Collaboration, Social Embeddedness, and Value Creation: A Theoretical Analysis. International Journal of Management, 23(3), 548-558.
123. Lin, X. ve Kede, Q. (2011). 2011 International Conference on Management and Service Science Management and Service Science (MASS). 2011 International Conference, 1-5.
124. Lin, X. ve Kede, Q. (2011). 2011 International Conference on Management and Service Science Management and Service Science (MASS). 2011 International Conference, 1-5.
125. Lynch, S. E. ve Mors, M. L. (2018). Strategy Implementation and Organizational Change: How Formal Reorganization Affects Professional Networks. Long Range Planning, February, 1-16.
126. Lynch, S. E. ve Mors, M. L. (2018). Strategy Implementation and Organizational Change: How Formal Reorganization Affects Professional Networks. Long Range Planning, February, 1-16.
127. Mardin, Ş. (1973). Center-Periphery Relations: A Key to Turkish Politics?. The MIT Press, 102(1), 169-190.
128. Mardin, Ş. (1973). Center-Periphery Relations: A Key to Turkish Politics?. The MIT Press, 102(1), 169-190.
129. Mardin, Ş. (2003). Din ve İdeoloji, İstanbul: İletişim.
130. Mardin, Ş. (2003). Din ve İdeoloji, İstanbul: İletişim.
131. Marsden, P. V. (1988). Homogeneity in Confiding Relations. Social Networks, 10(1), 57-76.
132. Marsden, P. V. (1988). Homogeneity in Confiding Relations. Social Networks, 10(1), 57-76.
133. Mcpherson, M., Lovin, L. S. ve Cook, J. M. (2001). Birds of a Feather: Homophily in Social Networks. Annual Review of Sociology, 27, 415–444.
134. Mcpherson, M., Lovin, L. S. ve Cook, J. M. (2001). Birds of a Feather: Homophily in Social Networks. Annual Review of Sociology, 27, 415–444.
135. Mintzberg, H. (1979). The Structuring of Organizations, Englewood Cliffs NJ: Prentice Hall.
136. Mintzberg, H. (1979). The Structuring of Organizations, Englewood Cliffs NJ: Prentice Hall.
137. Moller, K. ve Rajala, A. (2007). Rise of Strategic Nets — New Modes of Value Creation. Industrial Marketing Management, 36(7), 895-908.
138. Moller, K. ve Rajala, A. (2007). Rise of Strategic Nets — New Modes of Value Creation. Industrial Marketing Management, 36(7), 895-908.
139. Moller, K. ve Halinen, A. (2017). Managing Business and Innovation Networks—From Strategic Nets to Business Felds and Ecosystems. Industrial Marketing Management, 67, 5-22.
140. Moller, K. ve Halinen, A. (2017). Managing Business and Innovation Networks—From Strategic Nets to Business Felds and Ecosystems. Industrial Marketing Management, 67, 5-22.
141. Moran, P. (2005). Structural vs. Relational Embeddedness: Social Capital and Managerial Performance. Strategic Management Journal, 26(12), 1129-1151.
142. Moran, P. (2005). Structural vs. Relational Embeddedness: Social Capital and Managerial Performance. Strategic Management Journal, 26(12), 1129-1151.
143. Nelson, R. E. (1988). Social Network Analysis as Intervention Tool: Examples From the Field. Group and Organization Studies, 13(1), 39-58.
144. Nelson, R. E. (1988). Social Network Analysis as Intervention Tool: Examples From the Field. Group and Organization Studies, 13(1), 39-58.
145. Oliver, A. L ve Ebers, M. (1998). Networking Network Studies: An Analysis of Conceptual Configurations in the Study of Inter-organizational Relationships. Organization Studies, 19(4), 549-594.
146. Oliver, A. L ve Ebers, M. (1998). Networking Network Studies: An Analysis of Conceptual Configurations in the Study of Inter-organizational Relationships. Organization Studies, 19(4), 549-594.
147. Orru, M., Biggart, N. W. ve Hamilton, G. G. (1991). Organizational Isomorphism in East Asia: Broadening the New Insititutionalism. Institute of Governmental Affairs, University of California, Davis, 361-389.
148. Orru, M., Biggart, N. W. ve Hamilton, G. G. (1991). Organizational Isomorphism in East Asia: Broadening the New Insititutionalism. Institute of Governmental Affairs, University of California, Davis, 361-389.
149. Öberg, C., Shih, T. T. Y. ve Chou, H. H. (2016). Network Strategies and Effects in an Interactive Context. Industrial Marketing Management, 52, 117-127.
150. Öberg, C., Shih, T. T. Y. ve Chou, H. H. (2016). Network Strategies and Effects in an Interactive Context. Industrial Marketing Management, 52, 117-127.
151. Özdemir, N. (2010). Cumhuriyetin Öncü Sanayicisi İzzet Baysal, Ankara: Pfoenix Yayınevi.
152. Özdemir, N. (2010). Cumhuriyetin Öncü Sanayicisi İzzet Baysal, Ankara: Pfoenix Yayınevi.
153. Özen, Ş. ve Aslan, Z. (2006). İçsel ve Dışsal Sosyal Sermaye Yaklaşımları Açısından Türk Toplumunun Sosyal Sermaye Potansiyeli: Ortadoğu Sanayi ve Ticaret Merkezi (OSTİM) Örneği. Akdeniz İ.İ.B.F. Dergisi, 12, 130-161.
154. Özen, Ş. ve Aslan, Z. (2006). İçsel ve Dışsal Sosyal Sermaye Yaklaşımları Açısından Türk Toplumunun Sosyal Sermaye Potansiyeli: Ortadoğu Sanayi ve Ticaret Merkezi (OSTİM) Örneği. Akdeniz İ.İ.B.F. Dergisi, 12, 130-161.
155. Perez, V. F., Montes, F. J. L. ve Morales, V. J. L. (2014). Towards Strategic Flexibility: Social Networks, Climate and Uncertainty. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 114(6), 858-871. Perks, H., Kowalkowski, C., Witell, L. ve Gustafsson, A. (2017). Network Orchestration for Value Platform Development. Industrial Marketing Management, 67, 106-121.
156. Perez, V. F., Montes, F. J. L. ve Morales, V. J. L. (2014). Towards Strategic Flexibility: Social Networks, Climate and Uncertainty. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 114(6), 858-871. Perks, H., Kowalkowski, C., Witell, L. ve Gustafsson, A. (2017). Network Orchestration for Value Platform Development. Industrial Marketing Management, 67, 106-121.
157. Podolny, J. M. ve Page, K. L. (1998). Network Forms of Organization. Annual Review of Sociology, 24, 57-76.
158. Podolny, J. M. ve Page, K. L. (1998). Network Forms of Organization. Annual Review of Sociology, 24, 57-76.
159. Podolny, J. M. (2001). Networks as the Pipes and Prisms of the Market. American Journal os Sociology, 107(1), 33-60.
160. Podolny, J. M. (2001). Networks as the Pipes and Prisms of the Market. American Journal os Sociology, 107(1), 33-60.
161. Polanyi, K. (2001). The Great Transformation, Boston: Beacon Press.
162. Polanyi, K. (2001). The Great Transformation, Boston: Beacon Press.
163. Porter, K. A. ve Powell, W. W. (2006). Networks and Organizations. The Sage Handbook of Organizaiton Studies.
164. Porter, K. A. ve Powell, W. W. (2006). Networks and Organizations. The Sage Handbook of Organizaiton Studies.
165. Powell, W. W. ve Dimaggio, P. J. (1991). The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
166. Powell, W. W. ve Dimaggio, P. J. (1991). The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
167. Powell, W. W. ve Grodal, S. (2006). Networks of Innovators. The Oxford Handbook of Innovation, Ed. Jan Fagerberg and David C. Mowery.
168. Powell, W. W. ve Grodal, S. (2006). Networks of Innovators. The Oxford Handbook of Innovation, Ed. Jan Fagerberg and David C. Mowery.
169. Pratono, A. H. (2018). From Social Network to Firm Performance. Management Research Review, 41(6), 680-700.
170. Pratono, A. H. (2018). From Social Network to Firm Performance. Management Research Review, 41(6), 680-700.
171. Provan, K. G. ve Milward, B. H. (2001). Do Networks Really Work? A Framework for Evaluating Public-Sector Organizational Networks. Public Administration Review, 61(4), 414-423.
172. Provan, K. G. ve Milward, B. H. (2001). Do Networks Really Work? A Framework for Evaluating Public-Sector Organizational Networks. Public Administration Review, 61(4), 414-423.
173. Provan, K. G. ve Kenis, P. (2007). Modes of Network Governance: Structure, Management and Effectiveness. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18(2), 229-252.
174. Provan, K. G. ve Kenis, P. (2007). Modes of Network Governance: Structure, Management and Effectiveness. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18(2), 229-252.
175. Rao, H., Davis, G. F. ve Ward, A. (2000). Embeddedness, Social Identity and Mobility; Why Firms Leave the NASDAQ and Join the New York Stock Exchange. Administrative Science Quarterly, 45(2), 268-292.
176. Rao, H., Davis, G. F. ve Ward, A. (2000). Embeddedness, Social Identity and Mobility; Why Firms Leave the NASDAQ and Join the New York Stock Exchange. Administrative Science Quarterly, 45(2), 268-292.
177. Ritter, T., Wilkinson, I. F. ve Johnston, W. J. (2004). Managing in Complex Business Networks. Industrial Marketing Management, 33(3), 175-183.
178. Ritter, T., Wilkinson, I. F. ve Johnston, W. J. (2004). Managing in Complex Business Networks. Industrial Marketing Management, 33(3), 175-183.
179. Robinson, S. (2011). Social Networks And Entrepreneurial Growth. International Journal of Management & Information Systems, 15(4), 182-187.
180. Robinson, S. (2011). Social Networks And Entrepreneurial Growth. International Journal of Management & Information Systems, 15(4), 182-187.
181. Rodrigues, J. (2004). Endogeneous preferences and embeddedness: A reappraisal of Karl Polanyi. Journal of Economic Issues, 38(1), 189-200.
182. Rodrigues, J. (2004). Endogeneous preferences and embeddedness: A reappraisal of Karl Polanyi. Journal of Economic Issues, 38(1), 189-200.
183. Sargut, S. A. (2003). Kurumsal Alanlardaki Örgüt Yapılarının Oluşmasında ve Ekonomik İşlemlerin Yürütülmesinde Güvenin Rolü. Sosyal Bilimlerde Güven, Ed. Ferda Erdem, Ankara: Vadi Yayınları, 89-124.
184. Sargut, S. A. (2003). Kurumsal Alanlardaki Örgüt Yapılarının Oluşmasında ve Ekonomik İşlemlerin Yürütülmesinde Güvenin Rolü. Sosyal Bilimlerde Güven, Ed. Ferda Erdem, Ankara: Vadi Yayınları, 89-124.
185. Sargut, S. A., Varoğlu, K., Özen, Ş., Oğuz, F., Sözen, C., Yeloğlu, O. H. ve Sağsan, M. (2007). Ulusal İş Sistemi ve Örgüt Ağları: Merkez-Çevre İkiliğinin Örgütler Arası İlişkilere Etkisi. Ankara: Tübitak 106K174 Nolu Araştırma Projesi.
186. Sargut, S. A., Varoğlu, K., Özen, Ş., Oğuz, F., Sözen, C., Yeloğlu, O. H. ve Sağsan, M. (2007). Ulusal İş Sistemi ve Örgüt Ağları: Merkez-Çevre İkiliğinin Örgütler Arası İlişkilere Etkisi. Ankara: Tübitak 106K174 Nolu Araştırma Projesi.
187. Schmidt, T. ve Braun, T. (2015). When Cospecialization Leads to Rigidity: Path Dependence In Successful Strategic Networks. Schmalenbach Business Review, 67(4), 489-515.
188. Schmidt, T. ve Braun, T. (2015). When Cospecialization Leads to Rigidity: Path Dependence In Successful Strategic Networks. Schmalenbach Business Review, 67(4), 489-515.
189. Shils, E. (2002). Merkez ve Çevre. çev. Yusuf Ziya Çelikkaya, Türkiye Günlüğü, 70, 86-96.
190. Shils, E. (2002). Merkez ve Çevre. çev. Yusuf Ziya Çelikkaya, Türkiye Günlüğü, 70, 86-96.
191. Singh, A., Kumar, R. ve Singh, Y. N. (2015). Impact of Structural Centrality Based Attacks in Complex Networks. Acta Physica Polonica B, 46(2), 305-325.
192. Singh, A., Kumar, R. ve Singh, Y. N. (2015). Impact of Structural Centrality Based Attacks in Complex Networks. Acta Physica Polonica B, 46(2), 305-325.
193. Simsek, Z., Lubatkin, M. H. ve Floyd, S. W. (2003). Inter-Firm Networks and Entrepreneurial Behavior: A Structural Embeddedness Perspective. Journal of Management, 29(3), 427–442.
194. Simsek, Z., Lubatkin, M. H. ve Floyd, S. W. (2003). Inter-Firm Networks and Entrepreneurial Behavior: A Structural Embeddedness Perspective. Journal of Management, 29(3), 427–442.
195. Smith, J. O. ve Powell, W. W. (2008). Networks and Institution. The Sage Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism, 594-621.
196. Smith, J. O. ve Powell, W. W. (2008). Networks and Institution. The Sage Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism, 594-621.
197. Sorenson, O. (2018). Social Networks and the Geography of Entrepreneurship. Small Business Economics, 51, 527-537.
198. Sorenson, O. (2018). Social Networks and the Geography of Entrepreneurship. Small Business Economics, 51, 527-537.
199. Sousa, C., Fontes, M. ve Videira, P. (2008). The Role of Entrepreneurs' Social Networks in the Creation and Early Development of Biotechnology Companies. International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Small Business, 12(2), 227-244.
200. Sousa, C., Fontes, M. ve Videira, P. (2008). The Role of Entrepreneurs' Social Networks in the Creation and Early Development of Biotechnology Companies. International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Small Business, 12(2), 227-244.
201. Szyliowicz, J. S. (1995). State and Business in Modern Turkey by Ayşe Bugra. International Journal of Middle East Studies, 27(1), 123-125.
202. Szyliowicz, J. S. (1995). State and Business in Modern Turkey by Ayşe Bugra. International Journal of Middle East Studies, 27(1), 123-125.
203. Swedberg, R. ve Granovetter, M. (1992). The Sociology of Economic Life, New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
204. Swedberg, R. ve Granovetter, M. (1992). The Sociology of Economic Life, New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
205. Sydow, J. ve Windeler, A. (1998). Organizing and Evaluating Interfirm Networks: A Structurationist Perspective on Network Processes and Effectiveness. Organization Science, 9(3), 265-284.
206. Sydow, J. ve Windeler, A. (1998). Organizing and Evaluating Interfirm Networks: A Structurationist Perspective on Network Processes and Effectiveness. Organization Science, 9(3), 265-284.
207. Thorelli, H. B. (1986). Networks: Between Markets and Hierarchies. Strategic Management Journal, 7(1), 37-51.
208. Thorelli, H. B. (1986). Networks: Between Markets and Hierarchies. Strategic Management Journal, 7(1), 37-51.
209. Tunçay, S. S. ve Özer, P. S. (2017). Asil-Vekil İlişkilerinin Kültürel Bağlamda Sosyal Ağ Kuramı Çerçevesinde Sosyal Ağ Analizi Kullanılarak İncelenmesi. İşletme Araştırmaları Dergisi, 9(2), 478-510.
210. Tunçay, S. S. ve Özer, P. S. (2017). Asil-Vekil İlişkilerinin Kültürel Bağlamda Sosyal Ağ Kuramı Çerçevesinde Sosyal Ağ Analizi Kullanılarak İncelenmesi. İşletme Araştırmaları Dergisi, 9(2), 478-510.
211. Tüsiad, Türk Toplumunun Değerleri, İstanbul: TÜSİAD Yayınları.
212. Tüsiad, Türk Toplumunun Değerleri, İstanbul: TÜSİAD Yayınları.
213. Uzzi, B. (1996). The Source and Consequences of Embeddedness for the Economic Performance of Organizations: The Network Effect. American Sociological Review, 61(4), 674-698.
214. Uzzi, B. (1996). The Source and Consequences of Embeddedness for the Economic Performance of Organizations: The Network Effect. American Sociological Review, 61(4), 674-698.
215. Uzzi, B. (1997). Social Structure and Competition in Interfirm Networks: The Paradox of Embeddedness. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42(1), 35-67.
216. Uzzi, B. (1997). Social Structure and Competition in Interfirm Networks: The Paradox of Embeddedness. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42(1), 35-67.
217. Uzzi, B. (1999). Embeddedness in the Making of Financial Capital: How Social Relation and Networks Benefit Firms Seeking Financing. American Sociological Review, 64(4), 481-505.
218. Uzzi, B. (1999). Embeddedness in the Making of Financial Capital: How Social Relation and Networks Benefit Firms Seeking Financing. American Sociological Review, 64(4), 481-505.
219. Venkatraman, V. N. ve Lee, C. H. (2004). Preferential Linkage and Network Evolution: A Conceptual Model and Emprical Test in the U.S. Video Game Sector. Academy of Management Journal, 47(6), 876-892.
220. Venkatraman, V. N. ve Lee, C. H. (2004). Preferential Linkage and Network Evolution: A Conceptual Model and Emprical Test in the U.S. Video Game Sector. Academy of Management Journal, 47(6), 876-892.
221. Whiteman, G. ve Cooper, W. H. (2000). Ecological Embeddedness. Academy of Management Journal, 43(6), 1265-1282.
222. Whiteman, G. ve Cooper, W. H. (2000). Ecological Embeddedness. Academy of Management Journal, 43(6), 1265-1282.
223. Whitley, R. The Institutional Structuring of Innovation Strategies: Business Systems, Firm Types and Patterns of Technical Change in Different Market Economies. Organization Studies, 21(5), 855–886.
224. Whitley, R. The Institutional Structuring of Innovation Strategies: Business Systems, Firm Types and Patterns of Technical Change in Different Market Economies. Organization Studies, 21(5), 855–886.
225. Wolf, H. G. ve Kim, S. (2012). The Relationship Between Networking Behaviors and The Big Five Personality Dimensions. Career Development International, 17(1), 43-66.
226. Wolf, H. G. ve Kim, S. (2012). The Relationship Between Networking Behaviors and The Big Five Personality Dimensions. Career Development International, 17(1), 43-66.
227. Xie, X. ve Gao, Y. (2018). Strategic Networks and New Product Performance: The Mediating Role of Ambidextrous Innovation. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 30(7), 811-824.
228. Xie, X. ve Gao, Y. (2018). Strategic Networks and New Product Performance: The Mediating Role of Ambidextrous Innovation. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 30(7), 811-824.
229. Yeloğlu, H. O. (2008). Örgütsel Ekoloji Kuramı, Yerleşiklik Kavramı ve Kapanma Oranlarına Yönelik Önermeler. 16. Ulusal Yönetim ve Organizasyon Kongresi Bildiriler Kitabı, TC İstanbul Kültür Üniversitesi, 243-247.
230. Yeloğlu, H. O. (2008). Örgütsel Ekoloji Kuramı, Yerleşiklik Kavramı ve Kapanma Oranlarına Yönelik Önermeler. 16. Ulusal Yönetim ve Organizasyon Kongresi Bildiriler Kitabı, TC İstanbul Kültür Üniversitesi, 243-247.
231. Yoo, M. (2003). Social Networks and Entrepreneurship in Silicon Valley - Executive Summary. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1371670.
232. Yoo, M. (2003). Social Networks and Entrepreneurship in Silicon Valley - Executive Summary. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1371670.
233. Zheng, H., Li, D., Wu, J. ve Xu, Y. (2014). The Role of Multidimensional Social Capital in Crowdfunding: A Comparative Study in China and US. Information & Management, 51, 488-496.
234. Zheng, H., Li, D., Wu, J. ve Xu, Y. (2014). The Role of Multidimensional Social Capital in Crowdfunding: A Comparative Study in China and US. Information & Management, 51, 488-496.