ORMAN OKULU TEMELLİ EĞİTİM UYGULAMALARINA İLİŞKİN ÖĞRENCİ GÖRÜŞLERİNİN İNCELENMESİ

Abstract

Bu araştırma, çevre okuryazarı bireyler yetişmesini ilke edinen orman okulu temelli eğitim uygulamalarını deneyimleyen ortaokul öğrencilerinin görüşlerini ve deneyimlerini incelemek amacıyla yapılmıştır. Araştırmada nitel araştırma yöntemlerinden durum çalışması yöntemi kullanılmıştır. Araştırmanın çalışma grubunu kırsal bir bölgede bir devlet okulunda öğrenim görmekte olan ortaokul 5.sınıf öğrencileri oluşturmuştur. Doğa eğitimi sertifikasına sahip olan araştırmacı tarafından 10 hafta süren bir eğitim planı hazırlanmıştır. Yarı yapılandırılmış görüşme formu kullanarak toplanan veriler, tematik analiz yöntemiyle analiz edilmiştir. Araştırma bulgularına göre öğrencilerin orman okulu temelli eğitim uygulamalarına yönelik görüşleri olumlu yönde seyretmiştir. Öğrencilerin çevre dostu davranışlarının ve çevreye karşı duyarlılıklarının arttığı görülmüş, çevreyle duygusal bir bağ kurdukları gözlemlenmiştir. Öğrencilerin çevreye karşı koruyucu bir tutum içinde oldukları görülmüştür. Geleneksel sınıf ortamlarına alternatif bir yaklaşım olarak görülen orman okulu yaklaşımı, zengin öğrenme etkinlikleriyle çevreye yönelik bilgi, tutum ve davranışların olumlu yönde olmasına katkı sağlayacaktır.

Keywords

• orman okulu
• ortaokul öğrencileri
• çevre okuryazarlığı
• çevre

Examination of Student Opinions on Forest School-Based Educational Practices

Abstract

This research was conducted to examine the opinions and experiences of secondary school students who experienced forest school-based education practices that adopted the principle of raising environmental literacy individuals. In the research, the case study method, one of the qualitative research methods, was used. The study group consisted of 5th grade secondary school students studying in a public school in a rural area. The researcher, who has a nature education certificate, prepared an education plan that lasts 10 weeks. The datas collected using a semi-structured interview form was analysed using thematic analysis method. According to the research findings, it was observed that the students' views on forest school-based education practices were positive. It was observed that the students established an emotional bond with the environment and had a protective attitude towards nature. Also, their behaviours' sensitivity towards environment have increased. In this context, the forest school approach, which is thought to be an alternative to traditional closed classroom environments, will ensure that students' knowledge, attitudes and behaviours towards the environment progress positively thanks to rich learning activities.

Keywords

• Forest school
• The literacy of environment
• Secondary school students
• Environment

References

1. Aydın, Y., & Aykırı, K. (2023). Primary school teachers’ views on the role of forest school in life science teaching. International Journal of Educational Research, 14(4), 304-324.
2. Baierl, T. M., & Bogner, F. X. (2024). Cognitive learning about forests: the key role of environmental attitude. International Journal of Science Education, 47(3), 358–378. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2024.2323917
3. Barrable, A., & Arvanitis, A. (2019). Flourishing in the forest: Looking at Forest School through a self-determination theory lens. Journal of Outdoor and Environmental Education, 22(1), 39-55.
4. Barrable, A., & Booth, D. (2020). Nature connection in early childhood: A quantitative cross-sectional study. Sustainability, 12(1), 375.
5. Bingley, A., & Milligan, C. (2004). Climbing Trees and Building Dens: Mental health and well-being in young adults and the long-term effects of childhood play experience. Institute for Health Research, Lancaster University.
6. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101.
7. Button, J., & Wilde, A. (2019). Exploring practitioners’ perceptions of risk when delivering Forest School for 3-to 5-year-old children. International Journal of Play, 8(1), 25-38.
8. Calogiuri, G., & Chroni, S. (2014). The impact of the natural environment on the promotion of active living: An integrative systematic review. BMC Public Health, 14 (1), 873. doi:10.1186/1471-2458-14-873

9. Chawla, L., & Cushing, D. F. (2007). Education for strategic environmental behavior. Environmental education research, 13(4), 437-452.
10. Coates, J. K., & Pimlott‐Wilson, H. (2019). Learning while playing: Children's forest school experiences in the UK. British Educational Research Journal, 45(1), 21-40.
11. Correia, M., Ribeirinha, T., Beirante, D., Santos, R., Ramos, L., Dias, I. S., & Martins, M. C. (2024). Outdoor STEAM education: Opportunities and challenges. Education Sciences, 14(7), 688.
12. Cree, J., & McCree. M. (2012). A brief history of the roots of forest school in the UK. Horizons, 60, 32–34.
13. Cronin de Chavez, A., Seims, A. L., Dickerson, J., Dharni, N., & McEachan, R. R. C. (2024). Unlocking the forest: An ethnographic evaluation of Forest Schools on developmental outcomes for 3-year-olds unaccustomed to woodland spaces. Wellcome open research, 9, 519. https://doi.org/10.12688/wellcomeopenres.22851.1
14. Cudworth, D., & Tymms, M. (2024). Motivating the learner: developing autonomy, competence and relatedness through forest school practice. Journal of Outdoor and Environmental Education, 27(3), 489–511 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42322-023-00146-0
15. Cumming, F., & Nash, M. (2015). An Australian perspective of a forest school: Shaping a sense of place to support learning. Journal of Adventure Education and Outdoor Learning, 15(4), 296-309.
16. Dabaja, Z. F. (2021). The Forest School impact on children: reviewing two decades of research. Education 3-13, 1-14.
17. Elliott, S., & Chancellor, B. (2014). From forest preschool to Bush kinder: An inspirational approach to preschool provision in Australia. Australasian Journal of Early Childhood, 39(4), 45–53.
18. Ernst, J., & Theimer, S. (2011). Evaluating the effects of environmental education programming on connectedness to nature. Environmental Education Research, 17(5), 577-598.
19. Erten, S. (2004). Çevre Eğitimi ve Çevre Bilinci Nedir, Çevre Eğitimi Nasıl Olmalıdır?, Çevre ve İnsan Dergisi, Çevre ve Orman Bakanlığı Yayın Organı. Sayı 65/66. 2006/25, Ankara.
20. Fiennes, C., Dickson, K., de Escobar, D. A., Romans, A., & Oliveri, S. (2015). The existing evidence-base about the effectiveness of outdoor learning. Giving Evidence.1-73.
21. Fjørtoft, I. (2004). Landscape as playscape: The effects of natural environments on children's play and motor development. Children Youth and Environments, 14(2), 21-44.
22. Forest School Association (2022). What is Forest School? https://forestschoolassociation.org/what-is-forest-school/. Accessed 15 March 2024.
23. Friedman, S., Gibson, J., Jones, C., & Hughes, C. (2022). ‘A new adventure’: a case study of autistic children at Forest School. Journal of Adventure Education and Outdoor Learning, 24(2), 202–218. https://doi.org/10.1080/14729679.2022.2115522
24. Garden, A., & Downes, G. (2023). A systematic review of forest schools literature in England. Education 3-13, 51(2), 320-336, DOI: 10.1080/03004279.2021.1971275.
25. Garden, A., & Downes, G. (2023). New boundaries, undecided roles: towards an understanding of forest schools as constructed spaces. Education 3-13, 52(8), 1542–1553. https://doi.org/10.1080/03004279.2023.2170187
26. Harper, N. J. (2017). Outdoor risky play and healthy child development in the shadow of the “risk society”: A forest and nature school perspective. Child & Youth Services, 38(4), 318-334. https://doi.org/10.1080/0145935X.2017.1412825
27. Harris, F. (2021). Developing a relationship with nature and place: the potential role of forest school. Environmental Education Research, 27(8), 1214–1228. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2021.1896679
28. Harris, F. (2023). Practitioners’ perspectives on children’s engagement in forest school. Education 3-13, 52(8), 1568–1577. https://doi.org/10.1080/03004279.2023.2183081
29. Harwood, D., & Collier, D. R. (2017). The matter of the stick: Storying/(re) storying children’s literacies in the forest. Journal of Early Childhood Literacy, 17(3), 336-352.
30. Kemp, N. (2020). Views from the staffroom: Forest school in English primary schools. Journal of Adventure Education and Outdoor Learning, 20(4), 369-380.
31. Khan, M., McGeown, S., & Bell, S. (2020). Can an outdoor learning environment improve children’s academic attainment? A quasi-experimental mixed methods study in Bangladesh. Environment and Behavior, 52(10), 1079–1104.
32. Kiray, S. A. (2012). A new model for the integration of science and mathematics: The balance model. Online Submission, 4(3), 1181-1196.
33. Klein, S., Watted, S., & Zion, M. (2021). Contribution of an intergenerational sustainability leadership project to the development of students’ environmental literacy. Environmental Education Research, 27(12), 1723-1758.
34. Knight, S., Coates, J. K., Lathlean, J. & Perez-del-Aguila, R. (2024). The development of an interdisciplinary theoretical framework for Forest School in the United Kingdom. British Educational Research Journal, 50(2), 905–922. https://doi.org/10.1002/berj.3953
35. Leather, M. (2018). A critique of “Forest School” or something lost in translation. Journal of outdoor and environmental education, 21(1), 5-18. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42322-017-0006-1.
36. Little, H., & Wyver, S. (2008). Outdoor play: Does avoiding the risks reduce the benefits?. Australasian Journal of Early Childhood, 33(2), 33-40.
37. Louv, R. (2019). Doğadaki Son Çocuk (7.Baskı). Tübitak Yayınları.
38. Mackinder, M. (2015). Footprints in the woods:‘Tracking’ a nursery child through a Forest School session. Education 3-13, 45(2), 176–190. https://doi.org/10.1080/03004279.2015.1069368
39. Maynard, T. (2007). Forest Schools in Great Britain: an initial exploration. Contemporary issues in early childhood, 8(4), 320-331.
40. Murphy, M. C. (2020). Bronfenbrenner’s bio-ecological model: a theoretical framework to explore the forest school approach?. Journal of Outdoor and Environmental Education, 23(2), 191-205.
41. Mycock, K. (2020). Forest schools: moving towards an alternative pedagogical response to the Anthropocene?. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 41(3), 427-440.
42. Nawaz, H., & Blackwell, S. (2014). Perceptions about forest schools: Encouraging and promoting Archimedes Forest Schools. Educational Research and Reviews, 9(15), 498.
43. O’Brien, L. (2009). Learning outdoors: the Forest School approach. Education 3-13, 37(1), 45–60. https://doi.org/10.1080/03004270802291798
44. O’Brien, L., & Murray, R. (2006). A marvellous opportunity for children to learn. A participatory evaluation of Forest School in England and Wales. Surrey: Forest Research.
45. O’Brien, L., & Murray, R. (2007). Forest School and its impacts on young children: Case studies in Britain. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 6(4), 249-265.
46. Palmberg, I. E., & Kuru, J. (2000). Outdoor Activities as a Basis for Environmental Education. The Journal of Environmental Education, 31(4), 32-36. https://doi.org/10.1080/00958960009598649
47. Passy, R., & Waite, S. (2011). School gardens and forest schools. Children learning outside the classroom from birth to eleven, 162-175.
48. Patton, M. Q. (2014). Nitel Araştırma ve Değerlendirme Yöntemleri. (Çev. M. Bütün ve S. B. Demir). Ankara: Pegem Akademi.
49. Richardson, T. (2023). What constitutes a high-quality environment for speech and language development? International Journal of Early Years Education, 33(1), 45–61. https://doi.org/10.1080/09669760.2023.2284185
50. Richardson, T., & Murray, J. (2019). Are young children's utterances affected by characteristics of their learning environments? A multiple case study. In Research in Young Children's Literacy and Language Development (pp. 159-170). Routledge.
51. Ridgers, N. D., Knowles, Z. R., & Sayers, J. (2012). Encouraging play in the natural environment: A child-focused case study of Forest School. Children's geographies, 10(1), 49-65.
52. Savery, A., Cain, T., Garner, J., Jones, T., Kynaston, E., Mould, K. & Wilson, D. (2020). Does engagement in Forest School influence perceptions of risk, held by children, their parents, and their school staff?. In Outdoor Learning Research (pp. 312-324). Routledge.
53. Sharma-Brymer, V., Brymer, E., Gray, T., & Davids, K. (2018). Affordances guiding Forest School practice: the application of the ecological dynamics approach. Journal of outdoor and environmental education, 21(1), 103-115.
54. Slade, M., Lowery, C., & Bland, K. E. N. (2013). Evaluating the impact of Forest Schools: a collaboration between a university and a primary school. Support for Learning, 28(2), 66-72.
55. Smith, M. A., Dunhill, A., & Scott, G. W. (2018). Fostering children’s relationship with nature: Exploring the potential of Forest School. Education 3-13, 46(5), 525-534.
56. Speldewinde, C. (2025). ‘Don’t Pick, Don’t Lick’: Connecting Young Children’s Risky Play in Nature to Science Education in Australian Bush Kinders. Early Childhood Education Journal, 53(4), 1133-1144.
57. Swarbrick, N., Eastwood, G., & Tutton, K. (2004). Self‐esteem and successful interaction as part of the forest school project. Support for Learning, 19(3), 142-146.
58. Tiplady, L. S., & Menter, H. (2021). Forest School for wellbeing: an environment in which young people can ‘take what they need’. Journal of Adventure Education and Outdoor Learning, 21(2), 99-114.
59. Trapasso, E., Knowles, Z., Boddy, L., Newson, L., Sayers, J., & Austin, C. (2018). Exploring gender differences within forest schools as a physical activity intervention. Children, 5(10), 138.
60. Trina, N. A., Monsur, M., Cosco, N., Shine, S., Loon, L., & Mastergeorge, A. (2024). How do nature-based outdoor learning environments affect preschoolers’ STEAM concept formation? A scoping review. Education Sciences, 14(6), 627.
61. Turtle, C., Convery, I., & Convery, K. (2015). Forest schools and environmental attitudes: A case study of children aged 8–11 years. Cogent Education, 2(1), 1100103.
62. Waite, S., & Davis, B. (2007). The contribution of free play and structured activities in ForestSchool to learning beyond cognition. Learning beyond cognition, 257.
63. Waite, S., Bølling, M., & Bentsen, P. (2016). Comparing apples and pears?: a conceptual framework for understanding forms of outdoor learning through comparison of English Forest Schools and Danish udeskole. Environmental education research, 22(6), 868-892.
64. Waite, S., Davis, B., & Brown, K. (2006). Forest School principles: ‘Why we do what we do’. Final report for funding body EYDCP (zero14plus). Exmouth, UK: University of Plymouth.
65. Whelan, J., & Kelly, O. (2023). Experiential, relational, playful pedagogy in Irish primary schools – possibilities offered by Forest School. Irish Educational Studies, 43(4), 1363–1387. https://doi.org/10.1080/03323315.2023.2280224
66. Yeh, F. Y., Tran, N. H., Hung, S. H., & Huang, C. F. (2021). A study of environmental literacy, scientific performance, and environmental problem-solving. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 1-2.
67. Yıldırım, G., & Akamca, G. Ö. (2017). The effect of outdoor learning activities on the development of preschool children. South African Journal of Education, 37(2).