Hemşirelik Öğrencilerine Halk Sağlığı Hemşireliği Uygulamalarını Öğretmede Simülasyonun Etkisi: Sistematik Derleme

Öz

Amaç: Bu sistematik derlemenin amacı, Halk Sağlığı Hemşireliği uygulamalarını öğretmede simülasyon eğitiminin hemşirelik öğrencilerinin öğrenme, beceri kazanımı ve memnuniyet düzeyi üzerindeki etkisini incelemektir. Yöntem: Bu çalışma, PRISMA 2020 kılavuzuna uygun olarak yürütülmüş sistematik bir derlemedir. Web of Science, PubMed, Scopus, Science Direct, DergiPark ve Google Scholar veri tabanlarında taranarak 493 makaleye ulaşılmış, PICOS kriterlerini karşılayan 8 makale çalışmaya dahil edilmiştir. Bulgular: İncelenen çalışmalarda simülasyon uygulamalarının; ev ziyaretleri, evde bakım, bulaşıcı hastalıklar için muayene odası, cami polikliniği, işyeri ve okul ortamı olmak üzere altı farklı toplum temelli uygulama alanında gerçekleştirildiği belirlenmiştir. Simülasyonların, hemşirelik öğrencilerinin öğrenme boyutunda bilgi düzeyi, öğrenmede özgüven, eleştirel düşünme, öğrenme süreci ve akademik başarı gibi alt değişkenleri; beceri boyutunda tanı koyma, iletişim, danışmanlık ve öz yeterlilik becerilerini; ayrıca memnuniyet düzeyini olumlu yönde etkilediği saptanmıştır. Simülasyonlarda en az 20 dakika en fazla 9 saatlik senaryolarla öğrenme, beceri ve memnuniyet ele alınmıştır. Sonuç: Bulgular, Halk Sağlığı Hemşireliği dersine yönelik simülasyon temelli uygulamaların, hemşirelik öğrencilerinin öğrenme, beceri kazanımı ve memnuniyet düzeyleri üzerinde olumlu etkiler sağlayabileceğine işaret etmektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• halk sağlığı hemşireliği
• hemşirelik eğitimi
• simülasyon

The Effect of Simulation in Teaching Public Health Nursing Practices to Nursing Students: Systematic Review

Öz

Objective: This systematic review aimed to examine the effects of simulation-based education on nursing students’ learning, skill acquisition, and satisfaction levels in teaching public health nursing practices. Methods: This study is a systematic review conducted in accordance with the PRISMA 2020 guidelines. A total of 493 articles were identified through searches of the Web of Science, PubMed, Scopus, ScienceDirect, DergiPark, and Google Scholar databases, and eight studies that met the PICOS criteria were included in the review. Results: The reviewed studies indicated that simulation-based interventions were implemented in six different community-based practice settings, including home visits, home care, examination rooms for infectious diseases, mosque polyclinics, workplace environments, and school settings. Simulation-based education was found to have positive effects on nursing students’ learning outcomes, including knowledge level, learning self-confidence, critical thinking, learning process, and academic achievement. Additionally, it had positive effects on skill-related outcomes, such as diagnostic reasoning, communication, counseling, and self-efficacy skills, as well as on student satisfaction. The duration of simulation scenarios ranged from a minimum of 20 minutes to a maximum of 9 hours. Conclusion: The findings suggest that simulation-based practices in public health nursing education may positively affect nursing students’ learning outcomes, skill acquisition, and satisfaction.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• public health nursing
• nursing education
• simulation

Kaynakça

1. Chen FQ, Leng YF, Ge JF, Wang DW, Li C, Chen B, et al. Effectiveness of virtual reality in nursing education: Meta-analysis. J Med Internet Res. 2020;22(9):e18290.
2. Ahn H, Kim HY. Implementation and outcome evaluation of high-fidelity simulation scenarios to integrate cognitive and psychomotor skills for Korean nursing students. Nurse Educ Today. 2015;35(5):706-11.
3. Stoodley C, McKellar L, Steen M, Fleet J. Simulation in midwifery education: A descriptive explorative study exploring students’ knowledge, confidence and skills in the care of the preterm neonate. Nurse Educ Pract. 2020;42:102635.
4. Shin S, Park J-H, Kim J-H. Effectiveness of patient simulation in nursing education: meta-analysis. Nurse Educ Today. 2015;35(1):176-82.
5. Hegland PA, Aarlie H, Strømme H, Jamtvedt G. Simulation-based training for nurses: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Nurse Educ Today. 2017;54:6-20.
6. Yoshioka-Maeda K, Naruse K. Effectiveness of health guidance simulation in community settings for public health nursing students: A preliminary study. SAGE Open Nurs. 2021;7:23779608211001355.
7. Warren JN, Luctkar-Flude M, Godfrey C, Lukewich J. A systematic review of the effectiveness of simulation-based education on satisfaction and learning outcomes in nurse practitioner programs. Nurse Educ Today. 2016;46:99-108..
8. Distelhorst KS, Wyss LL. Simulation in community health nursing: A conceptual approach. Clin Simul Nurs. 2013;9(10):e445-51.

9. Wheeler CA, McNelis AM. Nursing student perceptions of a community-based home visit experienced by a role-play simulation. Nurs Educ Perspect. 2014;35(4):259-61.
10. Gunowa NO, Elliott K, McBride M. Nursing simulation: A community experience. Br J Community Nurs. 2018;23(4):174-8.
11. Ates E, Ulus B, Karahan A. Simulation experience in community health nursing: Postpartum evaluation of the mother and the infant at home environment. Home Health Care Manag Pract. 2021;33(1):37-44.
12. Kempster C, McKellar L, Steen M, Fleet J. Simulation in midwifery education: A descriptive explorative study exploring students’ knowledge, confidence and skills in the care of the preterm neonate. Women Birth. 2017;30:13.
13. Gotwals B, Yeager ST. Improving the process of community-based student nurse practice through a high-fidelity simulated clinical experience. Nurse Educ. 2014;39(1):26-30.
14. Akselbo I, Olufsen V, Ingebrigtsen O, Aune I. Simulation as a learning method in public health nurse education. Public Health Nurs. 2019;36(2):226-32.
15. Hoffman JL, Argeros G. Using virtual simulation to teach community health nursing students about public health nursing. J Community Health Nurs. 2021;38(4):244-52.
16. Hoffman JL, Myler L, Seurynck K, Pellerin JG. Evaluating the effectiveness of an innovative community/public health nursing simulation: a mixed methods study. J Public Health. 2022;30(2):399-407.
17. Hoffman JL, Wu TY, Argeros G. An innovative community health nursing virtual reality experience: A mixed methods study. Creat Nurs. 2023;29(3):303-10.
18. Choi YJ, Um YJ. The effects of a home-visit nursing simulation for older people with dementia on nursing students’ communication skills, self-efficacy, and critical thinking propensity: quantitative research. Nurse Educ Today. 2022;119:105564.
19. Moher D, Shamseer L, Clarke M, Ghersi D, Liberati A, Petticrew M, et al. Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement. Syst Rev. 2015;4(1):1.
20. Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, Boutron I, Hoffmann TC, Mulrow CD, et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ. 2021;372:n71.
21. Joanna Briggs Institute. Checklist for quasi-experimental studies (non-randomized experimental studies). 2017. 2020.
22. Hong QN, Fàbregues S, Bartlett G, Boardman F, Cargo M, Dagenais P, et al. The mixed methods appraisal tool (MMAT) version 2018 for information professionals and researchers. Educ Inf. 2018;34(4):285-91.
23. Sterne JA, Hernán MA, Reeves BC, Savović J, Berkman ND, Viswanathan M, et al. ROBINS-I: A tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions. BMJ. 2016;355:i4919.
24. Smith SJ, Barry DG. An innovative approach to preparing nursing students for care of the elderly in the home. Geriatr Nurs. 2013;34(1):30-4.
25. Reaves RP, McEwing EM, Matsuda Y, Everett-Thomas R. Using simulation to evaluate exam scores in a public health nursing course. Public Health Nurs. 2020;37(4):596-601.