AN EVALUATION OF SOME CURRENT DISCUSSION ISSUES IN THE INTERNATIONAL LITERATURE ON ORGANIZATIONAL NETWORKS

Yıl 2022, Cilt: 5 Sayı: 1, 73 - 92, 31.03.2022

Murat Çubukcu

https://doi.org/10.54993/syad.1074835

Öz

The main purpose of the article is to reveal the general framework of scientific studies that emphasize the strategic importance of inter-organizational networks. For this purpose, the main discussion topics in the relevant literature were determined. The findings obtained through research and examinations in international scientific journals were evaluated collectively. In the literature review, the main axis discussions in the researches on network structures were determined. This article examines the main debates on network organizations, draws attention to the theoretical aspects, and conducts a study that provides an explanation of the accepted assumptions. Discussion topics and main findings on organizational networks published in international academic journals in the last three years are examined in a comparative and chronological manner in the form of a table. There are studies in the literature claiming that strategic partnerships and creating synergies and value chains are supported by taking place in inter-organizational networks. In the literature, there are discussions on the reasons for joining organizational networks and the advantages of being a member of a network. There are discussions that the reasons for participation in inter-organizational networks may be affected by the phenomenon of resilience.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Network, Inter-Organizational Networks, Strategic Networks.

ÖRGÜTSEL AĞLARA DAİR ULUSLARARASI LİTERATÜRDEKİ BAZI GÜNCEL TARTIŞMA KONULARININ DEĞERLENDİRİLMESİ

Öz

Makalenin temel amacı, örgütler arası ağların stratejik önemini vurgulayan bilimsel çalışmaların genel çerçevesini ortaya koymaktır. Bu amaç doğrultusunda, ilgili literatürdeki başlıca tartışma konuları belirlenmeye çalışılmıştır. Uluslararası bilimsel dergilerdeki araştırma ve incelemeler ile edinilen bulgular toplu bir biçimde değerlendirilmiştir. Yapılan literatür taramasında, ağ yapılarına ilişkin olarak yürütülen araştırmalardaki ana eksen tartışmalar ortaya konulmuştur. Bu makalede, ağ örgütlenmeleri ile ilgili ana tartışmalar incelenmiş, teorik yönlere dikkat çekilmiş ve kabul edilen varsayımların izahını sunan bir çalışma gerçekleştirilmiştir. Son üç yıla ait uluslararası akademik makalelerde örgütsel ağlara dair tartışma konuları ve temel bulguları bir tablo şeklinde karşılaştırmalı ve kronolojik olarak incelenmiştir. Örgütler arası ağlar içerisinde yer alarak stratejik ortaklıklar ile sinerji yaratmanın ve değer zincirleri oluşturmanın desteklenmeye çalışıldığını literatürde iddia eden çalışmalar vardır. Literatürde ağırlıklı olarak örgütsel ağlara katılım nedenleri ve bir ağa üye olmanın getireceği avantajlar konularında tartışmalar yürütülmektedir. Özellikle örgütler arası ağlara katılım gerekçelerinin yerleşiklik olgusundan etkilenebileceği konusunda tartışmalar olduğu tespit edilmiştir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Ağ, Örgütler Arası Ağlar, Stratejik Ağlar.

Kaynakça

• Adler, P., & Kwon, S.W. (2002). Social Capital: Prospects for a New Concept. Academy of Management Review, 27(1), 17-40.
• Aggarwal, W.A. (2019). Resource congestion in alliance networks: How a firm's partners’ partners influence the benefits of collaboration. Strategic Management Journal,41, 627-655.
• Agranoff, R. (2006). Inside Colaborative Networks: Ten Lessons for Public Manager. Public Administration Review, 66, 56-65.
• Ahuja, G. (2000). Collaboration Networks, Structural Holes, and Innovation: A Longitudinal Study. Administrative Science Quarterly, 45(3), 425-455.
• Alter, C., & Hage, J. (1993). Organizations Working Together, London: Sage.
• Barney, J.B., & Hansen, M.H. (1994). Trustworthiness as a Source of Competitive Advantage. Strategic Management Journal, 15, 175-190.
• Baum, J.A.C., & Oliver, C. (1991). Institutional Linkages and Organizational Mortality. Administrative Science Quarterly, 36(2), 187-218.
• Bayne, L., Schepis, D., & Purchase, S. (2017). A Framework for Understanding Strategic Network Performance: Exploring Efficiency and Effectiveness at the Network Level. Industrial Marketing Management, 67, 134-147.
• Borch, O.J., & Arthur, M.B. (1995). Strategic Networks Among Small Firms: Implications for Strategy Research Methodology. Journal of Management Studies, 32(4), 419-441.
• Boss, W.R. (1978). Trust and Managerial Problem Solving Revisited. Group & Organization Management, 3(3), 331-342.
• Burdil, M., & Geraudel, M. (2016). What are the interpersonal antecedents of women’s network satisfaction?. Gender in Management: An International Journal, 31(4), 266-280.
• Brass, D.J. (1984). Being in the Right Place: A Structural Analysis of Individual Influence in an Organization. Administrative Science Quarterly, 29(4), 518-539.
• Bueno, E., Salmador, M.P., & Rodriguez, O. (2004). The Role of Social Capital in Today’s Economy. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 5(4), 556-574.
• Burt, R.S. (1992). Structural Holes: The Social Structure of Competition. Harvard University Press.
• Burt, R.S. (1997). A Note on Social Capital and Network Content. Social Networks, 19, 355-374.
• Burt, R.S. (2000). The Network Structure of Social Capital. Research in Organizational Behavior, 22, 345-423.
• Burt, R.S. (2004). Structural Holes and Good Ideas. American Journal of Sociology, 110(2), 349-399.
• Burt, R.S. (2005). Brokerage & Closure. New York: Oxford University Press.
• Calise, S.G. (2021). Social Networks and Systems Theory. Russian Sociological Review, 20(1), 72-88.
• Canbolat, E.Ö. (2010). Örgütlerin İçinde Bulunduğu Ağ Şebekelerindeki Konumlarının Örgütsel Alandaki Eşbiçimliliğe Etkisi. Organizasyon ve Yönetim Bilimleri Dergisi, 2(1), 1-9.
• Canbolat, E.Ö. (2014). Organizational Network Effect on Diversification Strategies. Strategic Management Quarterly, 2(2), 27-48.
• Canbolat, E.Ö., Bas, A., & Cafri, R. (2014). An Alternative Forms of Organizing Business Model: A Model of Value Creater Networks. 10th International Strategic Management Conference, 150, 77-87.
• Canbolat, E.Ö., & Çeliksoy, E. (2015). Marketing Strategy Choice Of Members Of a Franchise Network: The Case Of Simit Sarayı. International Journal of Economics, Commerce and Management, III(1), 1-25.
• Casson, M., & Giusta, M.D. (2007). Entrepreneurship and Social Capital. International Small Business Journal, 25(3), 220-244.
• Choi, T.Y., & Hong, Y. (2002). Unveiling the Structure of Supply Networks: Case Studies in Honda, Acura and DaimlerChrysler. Journal of Operations Management, 20(5), 469-493.
• Coleman, J.S. (1988). Social Capital in the Creation of Human Capital. American Journal of Sociology, 94, 95-120.
• Coleman, J.S. (1990). Foundations of Social Theory. London: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
• Cote, R. (2019). The Evolution of Social Network Theory: Perceived Impact on Developing Networking Relationships. American Journal of Management, 19(3), 19-34.
• Cuypers, I.R.P., Ertug, G., Cantwell, J., Zaheer, A. & Kilduff, M. (2020). Making connections: Social networks in international business. Journal of International Business Studies, 51, 714-736.
• Çitçi, U.S., & Coşkun, R. (2012). Sosyal Ağ Kullanımında Süreç Yaklaşımı: Girişimcilerin Sosyal Ağları Kullanımında Farklılaşmanın Değerlendirilmesi. Selçuk Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 12(23), 125-156.
• Das, T.K., & Teng, B.S. (2001). Trust, Control, and Risk in Strategic Alliances:An Integrated Framework. Organization Studies, 22(2), 251-283.
• Dequech, D. (2003). Cognitive and Cultural Embeddedness: Combining Institutional Economics and Economic Sociology. Journal of Economic Issues, 37(2), 461-470.
• Dirlik, O. (2016). Türk İş Sisteminin Evrimi: Makro Kurumsal Bir İnceleme. Yönetim ve Organizasyon Araştırmaları Dergisi, 1(2), 5-30.
• Dogbe, C.S.K., Tian, H., Pomegbe, W.W.K., Sarsah, S.A. & Otoo, C.O.A. (2020). Effect of network embeddedness on innovation performance of small and medium-sized enterprises. Journal of Strategy and Management, 13(2), 181-197.
• Dong, D., Gao, X., Sun, X., & Liu, X. (2018). Factors Affecting the Formation of Copper International Trade Community: Based on Resource Dependence and Network Theory. Resources Policy, 57, 167-185.
• Dowling, J., & Pfeffer, J. (1975). Organizational Legitimacy: Social Values and Organizational Behavior. The Pacific Sociological Review, 18(1), 122-136.
• Driscoll, J.W. (1978). Trust and Participation in Organizational Decision Making as Predictors of Satisfaction. Academy of Management Journal, 21(1), 44-56.
• Eisenhardt, K.M., & Schoonhoven, C.B. (1996). Resource-based view of strategic alliance formation: Strategic and social effects in entrepreneurial firms. Organization Science, 7(2), 136-150.
• Eisenstadt, S.N. (2007). Modernleşme: Başkaldırı ve Değişim. Çev: U. Çoşkun, İstanbul: Doğu Batı Yayınları.
• Fan, J., & Su, J. (2021). Influence of Social Network Strength on Entrepreneurial Opportunity Recognition: A Chain Mediation Model of Need Knowledge and Technological Knowledge. Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society, https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/3817644, 1-10.
• Freeman, L.C. (1979). Centrality in Social Networks: Conceptual Clarification. Social Networks, 1(3), 215-239.
• Fukuyama, F. (2009). Büyük Çözülme: İnsan Doğası ve Toplumsal Düzenin Yeniden Oluşturulması. Çev: H. Kaya, İstanbul: Profil Kitap.
• Galaskiewicz, J., & Wassermen, S. (1989). Mimetic Processes Within an Interorganizational Field: An Empirical Test. Administrative Science Quarterly, 34(3), 454-479.
• Gargiulo, M., & Benassi, M. (2000). Trapped in Your Own Net? Network Cohesion, Structural Holes and the Adaptation of Social Capital. Organizaiton Sicence, 11(2), 183-196.
• Gnyawali, D.R., & Madhavan, R. (2001). Cooperative Networks and Competitive Dynamics: A Structural Embeddedness Perspective. Academy of Management Review, 26(3), 431-445.
• Gonzalez, G.R., Claro, D.P., & Palmatier, R.W. (2014). Synergistic Effects of Relationship Managers’ Social Networks on Sales Performance. Journal of Marketing, 78(1), 76-94.
• Grandri, A., & Soda, G. (1995). Inter-Firm Networks: Antecedents, Mechanisms and Forms. Organization Studies, 16(2), 183-214.
• Granovetter, M.S. (1973). The Strenght of Weak Ties. The American Journal of Sociology, 78(6), 1360-1380.
• Granovetter, M. (1983). The Strenght of Weak Ties: A Network Theory Revisited. Sociological Theory, 1, 201-233.
• Granovetter, M. (1985). Economic Action and Social Structure: The Problem of Embeddedness. American Journal of Sociology, 91(3), 481-510.
• Granovetter, M. (1992). Economic Institutions as Social constructions: A Framework for Analysis. Acta Sociologica, 35(1), 3-11.
• Gray, B., & Wood, D.J. (1991). Collaborative Alliances: Moving from Pratice to Theory. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 27(1), 3-22.
• Gulati, R. (1998). Alliances and Networks. Strategic Management Journal, 19(4), 293-317.
• Gulati, R. (1999). Network Location and Learning: The Influence of Network Resources and Firm Capabilities on Alliance Formation. Strategic Management Journal, 20(5), 397-420.
• Gulati, R., & Gargiulo, M. (1999). Where Do Interorganizational Networks Come From?. American Journal of Sociology, 104(5), 1439-1493.
• Gulati, R., Nohria, N., & Zaheer, A. (2000). Strategic Networks. Strategic Management Journal, 21(3), 203-215.
• Halinen, A., & Törnroos, J.A. (1998). The Role of Embeddedness in the Evolution of Business Networks. Scandinav Journal Management, 14(3), 187-205.
• Harjoto, M.A. & Wang, Y. (2020). Board of directors network centrality and environmental, social and governance (ESG) performance. Corporate Governance, 20(6), 965-985.
• Hotho, J.J., & Pedersen, T. (2012). Beyond the Rules of the Game: Three Institutional Approaches and How They Matter for International Business. In G. Wood, & M. Demirbağ (Ed), Handbook os Institutional Approaches to International Business. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, 236-273.
• Higgins, K.L., & Maciariello, J.A. (2004). Leading Complex Collaboration In Network Organizations: A Multidisciplinary Approach. Advances In Interdisciplinary Studies of Work Teams, 10, 203-241.
• Human, S.E., & Provan, K.G. (2000). Legitimacy Building in the Evolution of Small-Firm Multilateral Networks: A Comparative Study of Success and Demise. Administrative Science Quarterly, 45(2), 327-365.
• Jack, S. & Anderson, R.A. (2002). The Effect of Embeddednes on the Entrepreneurial Process. Journal of Business Venturing, Vol. 17, 2002, pp. 467-487.
• Jarillo, C.J. (1988). On Strategic Networks. Strategic Management Journal, 9(1), 31-41.
• Jarillo, C.J. (1993). Strategic Networks. Oxford: Butterworth‐Heinemann.
• Jeffrey, L.S. (2000). Venturing Into The Digital Economy: An Examination of an Electronic Business Corporate Entrepreneurship Team. (Doctorial Dissertation), Colorada: Colorada State Univeristy.
• Kamal, D.K.F., Honoré, F. & Nistor, C. (2021). When the weak are mighty: A two-sided matching approach to alliance performance. Strategic Management Journal, 42, 917-940.
• Kantur, D. (2017). Sosyal Girişimcilikte Yerleşiklik: Coğrafi Yayılım ve Kültürel Değerlerin Rolü. Girişimcilik ve İnovasyon Yönetimi Dergisi, 6(1), 173-196.
• Kapucu, N., & Montgomery, W.V. (2006). The Evolving Role of the Public Sector in Managing Catastrophic Disasters. Administration and Society, 38(3), 279-308.
• Katz, N., Lazer, D., Arrow, H., & Contractor, N. (2004). Network Theory and Small Groups. Small Group Research, 35(3), 307-332.
• Kırkbeşoğlu, E., & Sözen, H.C. (2009). Örgütsel Ağ Düzenekleri ve Yönetici Elitler. Savunma Bilimleri Dergisi, 8(1), 87-111.
• Kilduff, M., & Tsai, W. (2003). Social Networks and Organizations. 1. b., London: Sage Publications.
• Kilduff, M., & Brass, D. (2010). Organizational Social Network Research: Core Ideas and Key Debates. The Academy of Management Annals, 4(1), 317-357.
• Kim, H., & Rao, V. (2021). The role of network embeddedness across multiple social networks: Evidence from mobile social network games. International Journal of Research in Marketing, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijresmar.2021.10.007.
• Kim, Y., Guo, Y. & Yang, D.C. (2020). Social Networks of Firms and Corporate Social Responsibility. Journal of Accounting and Finance, 20(7), 114-125.
• Kleinbaum, A.M., & Stuart, T.E. (2014). Inside The Black Box of The Corporate Staff: Social Networks And The Implementation Of Corporate Strategy. Strategic Management Journal, 35(1), 24-47.
• Lazega, E. (2001). The Collegial Phenomenon: The Social Mechanisms of Cooperation Among Peers in a Corporate Law Partnership. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Li, N., Huang, Q., Ge, X., He, M., Cui, S., Huang, P., Li, S. & Fung, S.F. (2021). A Review of the Research Progress of Social Network Structure. Complexity, https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/6692210, 1-14.
• Lin, N. (1999). Building a Network Theory of Social Capital. Connections, 22(1), 28-51.
• Lin, N. (2001). Social Capital: A Theory of Social Structure. NY: Cambridge University Pres.
• Lin, N., Cook, K.S., & Burt, R.S. (2001). Social Capital: Theory and Research. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.
• Lin, M.H. (2006). Interorganizational Collaboration, Social Embeddedness, and Value Creation: A Theoretical Analysis. International Journal of Management, 23(3), 548-558.
• Lin, X., & Kede, Q. (2011). 2011 International Conference on Management and Service Science Management and Service Science (MASS). 2011 International Conference, 1-5.
• Lynch, S.E., & Mors, M.L. (2018). Strategy Implementation and Organizational Change: How Formal Reorganization Affects Professional Networks. Long Range Planning, 1-16.
• Lyu, Y., He, B., Zhu, Y. & Li, L. (2019). Network embeddedness and inbound open innovation practice: The moderating role of technology cluster. Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 144, 12–24.
• Mardin, Ş. (1973). Center-Periphery Relations: A Key to Turkish Politics?. The MIT Press, 102(1), 169-190.
• Mardin, Ş. (2003). Din ve İdeoloji. İstanbul: İletişim.
• Marszałek, K.C. (2020). Social embeddedness and its benefits for cooperation in a tourism destination. Journal of Destination Marketing & Management, 15, 1-17.
• Miersch, Y.T. (2017). Beyond Trust: Towards a Practice-Based Understanding of Governing Network Organizations. Journal of Management & Governance, 21(2), 473-498.
• Mizruchi, M.S., & Yoo, M. (2002). Interorganizational Power and Dependence. in Joel A.C. Baum (ed.), Companion to Organizations, New York: Blackwell, 599-620.
• Moller, K., & Rajala, A. (2007). Rise of Strategic Nets — New Modes of Value Creation. Industrial Marketing Management, 36(7), 895-908.
• Moller, K., & Halinen, A. (2017). Managing Business and Innovation Networks—From Strategic Nets to Business Felds and Ecosystems. Industrial Marketing Management, 67, 5-22.
• Moran, P. (2005). Structural vs. Relational Embeddedness: Social Capital and Managerial Performance. Strategic Management Journal, 26(12), 1129-1151.
• Nahapiet, J., & Ghossal, S. (1998). Social Capital, Intellectual Capital, and the Organizational Advantage. The Academy of Management Review, 23(2), 242-266.
• Nai, J., Lin, Y. & Kotha, R. (2021). A Foot in the Door: Field-experiments on Entrepreneurs’ Network Activation Strategies for Investor Referrals. Strategic Management Journal, September, https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.3341.
• Naude, P., & Buttle, A.F. (2000). Assessing Relationship Quality. Industrial Marketing Management, 29, 351-361.
• Novoselova, O.A. (2021). What matters for interorganizational connectedness? Locating the drivers of multiplex corporate networks. Strategic Management Journal, September, DOI: 10.1002/smj.3343.
• Ojasalo, J. (2008). Management of Innovation Networks: A Case Study of Different Approaches. European Journal of Innovation Management, 11(1), 51-86.
• Oliver, C. (1990). Determinants of Interorganizational Relationships: Integration and Future Directions. The Academy of Management Review, 15(2), 241-265.
• Özen, Ş., & Aslan, Z. (2006). İçsel ve Dışsal Sosyal Sermaye Yaklaşımları Açısından Türk Toplumunun Sosyal Sermaye Potansiyeli: Ortadoğu Sanayi ve Ticaret Merkezi (OSTİM) Örneği. Akdeniz İ.İ.B.F. Dergisi, 12, 130-161.
• Park, S., Grosser, T.J., Roebuck, A.A. & Mathieu, J.E. (2020). Understanding Work Teams From a Network Perspective: A Review and Future Research Directions. Journal of Management, 46(6), 1002-1028.
• Parkhe, A., WAasserman, S., & Ralston, D.A. (2006). New Frontiers in Network Development. Academy of Management Review, 31(3), 560-568.
• Partanen, J., & Möller, K. (2012). How to Build a Strategic Network: A Practitioner-Oriented Process Model for the ICT Sector. Industrial Marketing Management, 41(3), 481-494.
• Perez, V.F., Montes, F.J.L., & Morales, V.J.L. (2014). Towards Strategic Flexibility: Social Networks, Climate and Uncertainty. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 114(6), 858-871.
• Pfeffer, J., & Salancik, G.R. (1978). The External Control of Organizations: A Resource Dependence Perspective, New York: Harper & Row.
• Planko, J., Chappin, M.M.H., Cramer, J.M., & Hekkert, M.P. (2017). Managing Strategic System-Building Networks in Emerging Business Felds: A Case Study of the Dutch Smart Grid Sector. Industrial Marketing Management, 67, 37-51.
• Podolny, J.M., & Page, K.L. (1998). Network Forms of Organization. Annual Review of Sociology, 24, 57-76.
• Polanyi, K., (2001). The Great Transformation. Boston: Beacon Press.
• Porter, K.A., & Powell, W.W. (2006). Networks and Organizations. The Sage Handbook of Organizaiton Studies.
• Powell, W.W. (1990). Neither Market nor Hierarchy: Network Forms Of Organization. Research in Organizational Behavior, 12, 295-336.
• Powell, W.W., & Grodal, S. (2006). Networks of Innovators. The Oxford Handbook of Innovation, Ed. Jan Fagerberg and David C. Mowery.
• Provan, K.G., & Milward, B.H. (1995). A Preliminary Theory of Interorganizational Network Effectiveness: A Comparative Study of Four Community Mental Health Systems. Administrative Science Quarterly, 40(1), 1-33.
• Provan, K.G., & Kenis, P. (2007). Modes of Network Governance: Structure, Management and Effectiveness. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18(2), 229-252.
• Provan, K.G., & Lemaire, R.H. (2012). Core Concepts and Key Ideas for Understanding Public Sector Organizational Networks: Using Research to Inform Scholarship and Practice. Public Administration Review, 72(5), 638-648.
• Putnam, R.D. (2000). Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community, New York: Simon and Schuster.
• Rao, H., Davis, G.F., & Ward, A. (2000). Embeddedness, Social Identity and Mobility; Why Firms Leave the NASDAQ and Join the New York Stock Exchange. Administrative Science Quarterly, 45(2), 268-292.
• Ritter, T., Wilkinson, I.F. & Johnston, W.J. (2004). Managing in Complex Business Networks. Industrial Marketing Management, 33(3), 175-183.
• Ritvala, T., & Salmi, A. (2010). Value-Based Network Mobilization: A Case Study of Modern Environmental Networkers. Industrial Marketing Management, 39, 898-907.
• Rodrigues, J. (2004). Endogeneous preferences and embeddedness: A reappraisal of Karl Polanyi. Journal of Economic Issues, 38(1), 189-200.
• Sanders, T., Sloka, B., & Pauzuoliene, J. (2017). Improve Your Social Network And Have The Advantage In The Employement Seeking Process. Regional Formation and Development Studies, 23(3), 128-140.
• Sargut, S.A., Varoğlu, K., Özen, Ş., Oğuz, F., Sözen, C., Yeloğlu, O.H., & Sağsan, M. (2007). Ulusal İş Sistemi ve Örgüt Ağları: Merkez-Çevre İkiliğinin Örgütler Arası İlişkilere Etkisi. Ankara: Tübitak 106K174 Nolu Araştırma Projesi.
• Schilling, M., & Phelps, C.C. (2007). Interfirm Collaboration Networks: The Impact of Large-Scale Network Structure on Firm Innovation. Management Science, 53(7), 1113-1126.
• Schmidt, T., & Braun, T. (2015). When Cospecialization Leads to Rigidity: Path Dependence In Successful Strategic Networks. Schmalenbach Business Review, 67(4), 489-515.
• Seibert, S.E., Kramer, M.L. & Liden, R.C. (2001). A Social Capital Theory of Career Success. Academy of Management Journal, 44(2), 219-237.
• Shi, X., Lu, L., Zhang, W. & Zhang, Q. (2021). Managing open innovation from a knowledge flow perspective: the roles of embeddedness and network inertia in collaboration networks. European Journal of Innovation Management, 24(3), 1011-1034.
• Shi, X., Lu L., Zhang, W. & Zhang, Q. (2021). Structural network embeddedness and firm incremental innovation capability: the moderating role of technology cluster. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, 36(11), 1988-2000.
• Shils, E. (2002). Merkez ve Çevre. çev. Yusuf Ziya Çelikkaya, Türkiye Günlüğü, 70, 86-96.
• Sivadas, E., & Dwyer, R.F. (2000). An Examination of Organizational Factors Influencing New Product Success in Internal and Alliance-Based Processes. Journal of Marketing, 64(1), 31–49.
• Smith, J.O., & Powell, W.W. (2008). Networks and Institution. The Sage Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism, 594-621.
• Simşek, Z., Lubatkin, M.H. & Floyd, S.W. (2003). Inter-Firm Networks and Entrepreneurial Behavior: A Structural Embeddedness Perspective. Journal of Management, 29(3), 427–442.
• Sözen, C.H. (2007). Merkez-Çevre İkiliğinin Örgütler Arası İlişkilere Etkisi. 15. Ulusal Yönetim ve Organizasyon Kongresi Bildiriler Kitabı, Sakarya Üniversitesi, 68-74.
• Sözen, C.H., & Esatoğlu, A.E. (2010). Sosyal Ağ Kuramlarının Bakış Açısıyla Örgütlerde Çatışma Yönetimi. Stratejik Araştırmalar, 8(15), 109-134.
• Sözen, C.H., & Basım, N.H. (2012). Örgüt Kuramları, 2. b, İstanbul: Beta Yayınevi.
• Sözen, C. (2021). The Town of Bent Necks: Interorganizational Causes and Consequences of Relational Rivalry. Journal of Strategy and Management, 14(2), 1-15.
• Stuart, T.E., & Sorenson, O. (2007). Strategic Networks and Entrepreurial Ventures. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 1(3-4), 211-227.
• Suchman, M.C. (1995). Managing Legitimacy: Strategic and Institutional Approaches. The Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 571-610.
• Sullivan, D.M., & Cameron, F.M. (2014). How Entrepreneurs Use Networks to Address Changing Resource Requirements During Early Venture Development. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 38(3), 551-574.
• Swedberg, R., & Granovetter, M. (1992). The Sociology of Economic Life, New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
• Sydow, J., & Windeler, A. (1998). Organizing and Evaluating Interfirm Networks: A Structurationist Perspective on Network Processes and Effectiveness. Organization Science, 9(3), 265-284.
• Thorelli, H.B. (1986). Networks: Between Markets and Hierarchies. Strategic Management Journal, 7(1), 37-51.
• Tsai, W., & Ghosal, S. (1998). Social Capital and Value Creation: The Role of Interfirm Networks. Academy of Management Journal, 41(4), 454-476.
• Tsai, W. (2001). Knowledge Transfer in Intraorganizational Networks: Effects of Network Position and Absorptive Capacity on Business Unit Innovation and Performance. The Academy of Management Journal, 44(5), 996-1004.
• Uzzi, B. (1996). The Source and Consequences of Embeddedness for the Economic Performance of Organizations: The Network Effect. American Sociological Review, 61(4), 674-698.
• Uzzi, B. (1997). Social Structure and Competition in Interfirm Networks: The Paradox of Embeddedness. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42(1), 35-67.
• Uzzi, B. (1999). Embeddedness in the Making of Financial Capital: How Social Relation and Networks Benefit Firms Seeking Financing. American Sociological Review, 64(4), 481-505.
• Venkatraman, V.N., & Lee, C.H. (2004). Preferential Linkage and Network Evolution: A Conceptual Model and Emprical Test in the U.S. Video Game Sector. Academy of Management Journal, 47(6), 876-892.
• Westaby, J.D. & Parr, A.K. (2020). Network Goal Analysis of Social and Organizational Systems: Testing Dynamic Network Theory in Complex Social Networks. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 56(1), 107-129.
• Whiteman, G., & Cooper, W.H. (2000). Ecological Embeddedness. Academy of Management Journal, 43(6), 1265-1282.
• Whitley, R. (2000). The Institutional Structuring of Innovation Strategies: Business Systems, Firm Types and Patterns of Technical Change in Different Market Economies. Organization Studies, 21(5), 855–886.
• Williamson, O.E. (1979). Transaction-Cost Economics: The Governance Of Contractual Relations. The Journal of Law & Economics. 22(2), 233- 261.
• Williamson, O.E. (1983). Markets and Hierarchies: Analysis and Antitrust Implications, New York: The Free Press.
• Xie, X., & Gao, Y. (2018). Strategic Networks and New Product Performance: The Mediating Role of Ambidextrous Innovation. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 30(7), 811-824.
• Yan Yan, JingJing Zhang, Jiancheng Guan. (2020). Network Embeddedness and Innovation: Evidence From the Alternative Energy Field. Transactions on Engineering Management, 67(3), 769-781.
• Yeloğlu, H.O. (2005). Ulusal İş Sistemlerinde "Devlete Bağımlılık" Kavramı: Türk Ulusal İş Sistemi Üzerine Makro Kurumsal Bir Değerlendirme. Marmara Üniversitesi XIII. Ulusal Yönetim ve Organizasyon Kongresi Bildiriler Kitabı, 13-15.
• Zand, D.E. (1972). Trust and Managerial Problem Solving. Administrative Science Quarterly, 17(2), 229-239.
• Zhao, C., & Burt, R.S. (2018). A Note on Business Survival and Social Network. Management and Organization Review, 14(2), 377–394.
• Zhao, D., Wang, L. & Gu, F.F. (2021). Reconsidering network embeddedness: Effects on different forms of opportunism. Journal of Business Research, 131, 12-24.