Geopolitical risk and food price inflation: New evidence from advanced and emerging economies
Öz
Purpose: This study examines the relationship between geopolitical risk and domestic food price inflation across 32 advanced and emerging economies over the period 1995–2024, with a particular focus on heterogeneity across different geopolitical risk measures, country characteristics, and time periods.
Design/Methodology/Approach: A panel vector autoregressive (PVAR) framework is employed to analyse the dynamic relationship between geopolitical risk and food inflation. Four alternative measures of geopolitical risk—country-specific GPR, global GPR, GPR threats, and GPR acts—are considered. Impulse response functions and forecast error variance decompositions are used to evaluate the magnitude, persistence, and dynamic response patterns associated with geopolitical risk innovations.
Findings: The results indicate that innovations in geopolitical risk are associated with short-run increases in food inflation, although their quantitative contribution remains comparatively limited relative to traditional macroeconomic drivers such as oil prices and monetary conditions. Importantly, the observed responses are highly heterogeneous and state dependent. Emerging economies and food-import-dependent countries exhibit stronger and more persistent inflationary responses, whereas advanced and food-exporting economies display more muted and transitory patterns. In addition, the association between geopolitical risk and food inflation appears to have become more pronounced in the post-2008 period.
Originality/Value: This study contributes to the literature by jointly analysing multiple dimensions of geopolitical risk within a unified PVAR framework and by highlighting the importance of structural heterogeneity in food inflation dynamics. By distinguishing between alternative GPR measures and examining their associated response patterns, the paper provides new evidence on the dynamic relationship between geopolitical risk and food prices, offering relevant implications for food security and macroeconomic policy discussions.
Anahtar Kelimeler
Kaynakça
- Abrigo, M. R., & Love, I. (2016), “Estimation of panel vector autoregression in Stata”, The Stata Journal, Vol. 16 No.3, pp.778-804.
- Akaike, H. (1969). “Fitting autoregreesive models for prediction. In Selected Papers of Hirotugu Akaike” ,New York, NY: Springer New York. pp. 131-135.
- Akaike, H. (1978). “On the likelihood of a time series model”, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series D (The Statistician), Vol.27 No.(3-4), pp. 217-235.
- Akpan, U. F., Abubakar Sani, I. and Question, E.M. (2024), “Geopolitical Risks and Food Inflation Dynamics in Nigeria: A Time-Varying Granger Causality Analysis” Available at (May 21, 2024). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4836073 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4836073
- Andrews, D. W., & Lu, B. (2001). “Consistent model and moment selection procedures for GMM estimation with application to dynamic panel data models”, Journal of Econometrics, Vol. 101 No. 1, pp. 123-164.
- Attílio, L. A. (2025), “Geopolitical risk and food price inflation: a GVAR analysis of Brics and the g7”, The International Trade Journal, Vol. 39 No. 6, pp.622-647.
- Barrett, C. B., & Carter, M. R. (2013), “The economics of poverty traps and persistent poverty: Empirical and policy implications”, The Journal of Development Studies, Vol. 49 No. 7, pp. 976-990.
- Bouri, E., Gabauer, D., Gupta, R., & Kinateder, H. (2023), “Global geopolitical risk and inflation spillovers across European and North American economies”, Research in International Business and Finance, Vol. 66, pp. 102048.
Ayrıntılar
Birincil Dil
İngilizce
Konular
Tarım Ekonomisi (Diğer)
Bölüm
Araştırma Makalesi
Yazarlar
Erken Görünüm Tarihi
23 Haziran 2026
Yayımlanma Tarihi
26 Haziran 2026
Gönderilme Tarihi
12 Aralık 2025
Kabul Tarihi
9 Haziran 2026
Yayımlandığı Sayı
Yıl 2026 Cilt: 32 Sayı: 1