Üniversite Öğrencilerinin Web3 Teknolojileri Farkındalığının Çeşitli Değişkenler Açısından İncelenmesi

Öz

Web3 teknolojileri günümüz dünyasında hızla gelişmesi sonucunda toplumsal yaşantımız üzerinde yıkıcı bir etki oluşturmaya başlamıştır. Gelecekteki iş gücü ortamlarında vazgeçilmez olacağı öngörülen bu teknolojilerden doğru şekilde faydalanabilmek için özellikle üniversite öğrencilerinin bugünden doğru bir farkındalık geliştirmeye ihtiyacı vardır. Bu bağlamda üniversite öğrencileri arasında Web3 teknolojileri farkındalığını artırmak için düzenlenen eğitimler önemli hale gelmiştir. Bu araştırmada Gazi Üniversitesinin öğrencilerine ücretsiz olarak sunduğu Web3 eğitiminin üniversite öğrencilerinin Web3 teknolojilerine yönelik farkındalıkları üzerindeki etkisini çeşitli değişkenler açısından ortaya koymak amaçlanmıştır. Betimsel bir tarama çalışması olan bu araştırmanın örneklemi 387 Gazi Üniversitesi öğrencisinden oluşmaktadır. Araştırma verileri Web3 Farkındalık (WEB3F) Ölçeği ile çevrim içi ortamda toplanmıştır. Elde edilen sonuçlara göre Web3 eğitimine katılan üniversite öğrencilerinin Web3 teknolojileri farkındalık düzeylerinin ortalamanın üzerinde olduğu, öğrencilerin farkındalık düzeylerinin sadece internet kullanım geçmişine göre anlamlı bir farklılık gösterdiği; cinsiyet, yaş, sınıf düzeyi, eğitim düzeyi, eğitim alanı ve günlük internet kullanım süresi faktörlerine göre anlamlı farklılık göstermediği belirlenmiştir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Web3 Education
• Farkındalık
• Blokzinciri
• Akıllı sözleşmeler
• Metaverse
• NFT

Investigation of University Students' Awareness of Web3 Technologies in Terms of Different Variables

Öz

Web3 technologies have begun to have a disruptive impact on our social lives as a result of their rapid growth in today’s society. To profit from these technologies, which are expected to be vital in future working contexts, university students, in particular, must gain the right awareness of these technologies today. Trainings to raise Web3 technology awareness among university students have become more significant in these circumstances. The purpose of this study was to determine the impact of free Web3 training provided by Gazi University on university students’ awareness of Web3 technologies in terms of various factors. The sampling group for this study, which was designed using a descriptive survey study design, comprises 387 Gazi University students. The Web3 Awareness Scale (WEB3A) was used to collect study data online. According to the findings, the Web3 awareness levels of the university students who participated in Web3 training were above average. Students’ awareness levels differed significantly in terms of internet usage history but were not related to gender, age, class level, education level, field of study, or daily internet usage time.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Web3 Education
• Awareness
• Blokchain
• Smart Contracts
• Metaverse
• NFT

Kaynakça

1. Abdi, H. (2010). Coefficient of variation. N. Salkind (Ed.), Encyclopedia of research design içinde (s. 155–157). Thousand Oaks: Sage.
2. Agustina, T. S. & Fauzia, D. S. (2021). The need for achievement, risk-taking propensity, and entrepreneurial intention of the generation Z. Risenologi, 6(1), 96-106. https://doi.org/10.47028/j.risenologi.2021.61.161
3. Akbulut, Y. (2010). Sosyal bilimlerde SPSS uygulamaları. İstanbul: İdeal Kültür Yayıncılık.
4. Alabdulwahhab, F. A. (2018). Web 3.0: The Decentralized Web Blockchain networks and Protocol Innovation. 1st International Conference on Computer Applications and Information Security, ICCAIS 2018, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia içinde (s. 1-4). https://doi.org/10.1109/CAIS.2018.8441990
5. Alkhudary, R., Belvaux, B. & Guibert, N. (2023). Understanding non-fungible tokens (NFTs): Insights on consumption practices and a research agenda. Marketing Letters, 34(2), 321–336. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11002-022-09655-2/TABLES/2
6. Bai, Y., Lei, H., Li, S., Gao, H., Li, J. & Li, L. (2022). Decentralized and self-sovereign identity in the era of Blockchain: A survey. Proceedings - 2022 IEEE International Conference on Blockchain, Blockchain 2022 içinde (s. 500–507). https://doi.org/10.1109/BLOCKCHAIN55522.2022.00077
7. Balis, J. (2022). How Brands Can Enter the Metaverse. https://hbr.org/2022/01/how-brands-can-enter-the-metaverse sayfasından erişilmiştir.
8. Bellavitis, C., Fisch, C. & Momtaz, P. P. (2023). The rise of decentralized autonomous organizations (DAOs): A first empirical glimpse. Venture Capital, 25(2), 187–203. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691066.2022.2116797

9. Buldas, A., Draheim, D., Gault, M. & Saarepera, M. (2022). Towards a foundation of Web3. Communications in computer and information science. 1688 CCIS, 3–18. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-8069-5_1/FIGURES/3
10. Chen, C., Zhang, L., Li, Y., Liao, T., Zhao, S., Zheng, Z., … & Wu, J. (2022). When digital economy meets Web3.0: Applications and challenges. IEEE Open Journal of the Computer Society, 3, 233–245. https://doi.org/10.1109/OJCS.2022.3217565
11. Chen, Y. & Bellavitis, C. (2020). Blockchain disruption and decentralized finance: The rise of decentralized business models. Journal of Business Venturing Insights, 13(e00151). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbvi.2019.e00151
12. Chui, M., Issler, M., Roberts, R. & Yee, L. (2023). Technology trends outlook 2023. McKinsey & Company.
13. Creswell, J. W. & Creswell, J. D. (2017). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. USA: SAGE Publications.
14. Ding, W., Hou, J., Li, J., Guo, C., Qin, J., Kozma, R. & Wang, F. Y. (2022). DeSci based on Web3 and DAO: A comprehensive overview and reference model. IEEE Transactions on Computational Social Systems, 9(5), 1563–1573. https://doi.org/10.1109/TCSS.2022.3204745
15. Gao, H., Chong, A. Y. L. & Bao, H. (2023). Metaverse: Literature review, synthesis and future research agenda. Journal of Computer Information Systems [Çevrim içi ön yayın]. https://doi.org/10.1080/08874417.2023.2233455
16. Ghosh, B., Bouri, E., Wee, J. B. & Zulfiqar, N. (2023). Return and volatility properties: Stylized facts from the universe of cryptocurrencies and NFTs. Research in International Business and Finance, 65, 101945. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.RIBAF.2023.101945
17. Goswami, A. & Dutta, S. (2015). Gender differences in technology usage—A literature review. Open Journal of Business and Management, 4(1), 51-59. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojbm.2016.41006
18. Gökcan, M. & Kavas, A. B. (2018). Meslek seçiminde toplumsal cinsiyetin rolü: Bir ölçek geliştirme çalışması. Kariyer Psikolojik Danışmanlığı Dergisi, 1(1), 48-67.
19. Gupta, A., Khan, H. U., Nazir, S., Shafiq, M. & Shabaz, M. (2023). Metaverse security: Issues, challenges and a viable ZTA model. Electronics 2023, 12(2), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.3390/ELECTRONICS12020391
20. Hutcheson, G. D. & Sofroniou, N. (1999). The multivariate social scientist: An introduction to generalized linear models. Thousand Oaks, California: Sage Publications.
21. Idelberger, F. & Mezei, P. (2022). Non-fungible tokens. Internet Policy Review, 11(2), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.14763/2022.2.1660
22. Jereb, E., Urh, M., Jerebic, J. & Šprajc, P. (2018). Gender differences and the awareness of plagiarism in higher education. Social Psychology of Education, 21, 409-426. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-017-9421-y
23. Kalhoro, A., Wagan, A. A., Khan, A. A., Lin, J. M., Ku, C. S., Por, L. Y. & Yang, J. (2023). Rewarding developers by storing applications on non-fungible tokens. Mathematics 2023, 11, 1-12. https://doi.org/10.3390/MATH11112519
24. Kim, H.-Y. (2013). Statistical notes for clinical researchers: assessing normal distribution (2) using skewness and kurtosis. Restorative Dentistry & Endodontics, 38(1), 52–54. https://doi.org/10.5395/rde.2013.38.1.52
25. Kline, R. B. (2011). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (3. b.). New York: Guildford.
26. McCormac, A., Zwaans, T., Parsons, K., Calic, D., Butavicius, M. & Pattinson, M. (2017). Individual differences and information security awareness. Computers in Human Behavior, 69, 151-156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.11.065
27. Min, T. & Cai, W. (2022). Portrait of decentralized application users: an overview based on large-scale Ethereum data. CCF Transactions on Pervasive Computing and Interaction, 4(2), 124–141. https://doi.org/10.1007/S42486-022-00094-6/FIGURES/13
28. Momtaz, P. P. (2022). Some very simple economics of Web3 and the Metaverse. FinTech, 1(3), 225–234. https://doi.org/10.3390/FINTECH1030018
29. Mozumder, M. A. I., Sheeraz, M. M., Athar, A., Aich, S. & Kim, H. C. (2022). Overview: Technology roadmap of the future trend of metaverse based on Iot, blockchain, AI technique, and medical domain metaverse activity. International Conference on Advanced Communication Technology, ICACT, 2022-February içinde (s. 256–261). https://doi.org/10.23919/ICACT53585.2022.9728808
30. Murray, A., Kim, D. & Combs, J. (2023). The promise of a decentralized internet: What is Web3 and how can firms prepare? Business Horizons, 66(2), 191–202. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.BUSHOR.2022.06.002
31. Murray, A., Kuban, S., Josefy, M. & Anderson, J. (2021). Contracting in the smart era: The implications of blockchain and decentralized autonomous organizations for contracting and corporate governance. Academy of Management Perspectives, 35(4), 622–641. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMP.2018.0066
32. Ray, P. P. (2023). Web3: A comprehensive review on background, technologies, applications, zero-trust architectures, challenges and future directions. Internet of Things and Cyber-Physical Systems, 3, 213–248. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iotcps.2023.05.003
33. Rogers, E. M. (2010). Diffusion of innovations (4. b.). New York: The Free Press.
34. Saurabh, K., Rani, N. & Upadhyay, P. (2023). Towards blockchain led decentralized autonomous organization (DAO) business model innovations. Benchmarking, 30(2), 475–502. https://doi.org/10.1108/BIJ-10-2021-0606/FULL/PDF
35. Schär, F. (2020). Decentralized finance: On blockchain- and smart contract-based financial markets. SSRN Electronic Journal [Çevrim içi ön yayın]. https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.3571335
36. Sheridan, D., Harris, J., Wear, F., Cowell Jr, J., Wong, E. & Yazdinejad, A. (2022). Web3 challenges and opportunities for the market. Computers and Society [Çevrim içi ön yayın]. https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.2209.02446
37. Su, P., Wang, L. & Yan, J. (2018). How users’ Internet experience affects the adoption of mobile payment: a mediation model. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 30(2), 186-197. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537325.2017.1297788
38. Şen, S. & Yıldırım, İ. (2021). Eğitimde araştırma yöntemleri. Ankara: Nobel Yayıncılık.
39. Uysal, M., Üstündağ, M. T., Çelik, A., Tanrıverdi, M., Ceran, O. & Ayaz, Z. (baskıda). Development of Web3 Awareness Scale as the next evolution of the internet. Participatory Educational Research.
40. Wang, H., Ning, H., Lin, Y., Wang, W., Dhelim, S., Farha, F., … & Daneshmand, M. (2023). A Survey on the Metaverse: The state-of-the-art, technologies, applications, and challenges. IEEE Internet of Things Journal, 10(16), 14671-14688. https://doi.org/10.1109/JIOT.2023.3278329
41. Wang, Q., Li, R., Wang, Q. & Chen, S. (2021). Non-Fungible Token (NFT): Overview, evaluation, opportunities and challenges. Cryptography and Security. https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.2105. 07447
42. Wang, Q., Li, R., Wang, Q., Chen, S., Ryan, M. & Hardjono, T. (2022). Exploring Web3 from the view of blockchain. Cryptography and Security. https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.2206.08821
43. Yang, Q., Zhao, Y., Huang, H., Xiong, Z., Kang, J. & Zheng, Z. (2022). Fusing blockchain and AI with Metaverse: A survey. Computers and Society. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2201.03201
44. Zheng, P., Jiang, Z., Wu, J. & Zheng, Z. (2023). Blockchain-based decentralized application: A survey. IEEE Open Journal of the Computer Society, 4, 121–133. https://doi.org/10.1109/OJCS.2023.3251854
45. Zheng, Z., Xie, S., Dai, H., Chen, X. & Wang, H. (2017). An overview of blockchain technology: Architecture, consensus, and future trends. Proceedings - 2017 IEEE 6th International Congress on Big Data, BigData Congress 2017 içinde (s. 557–564). https://doi.org/10.1109/ BIGDATACONGRESS.2017.85