The Effect of the Good Behavior Game Implemented by Teachers on the in-Class Behaviors of the Students in Special Education Schools

Öz

In this study, the effectiveness of the "Good Behavior Game" (GBG) applied by teachers on the classroom behavior of students with intellectual disabilities at the primary school level of a special education practice school was examined. In this study, a multiple probe model with inter-participant probe trials, one of the single-subject research models, was used. The participants of the research were six classroom teachers working in a special education practice school affiliated with the Ministry of National Education and their students with intellectual disabilities. "GBG Teacher Training Package" was applied to classroom teachers by the researchers. In the research, the data obtained from the baseline and GBG application sessions were analyzed graphically. The effectiveness findings of the research gave the impression that the GBG applied by the primary teachers of the classes was effective in reducing the out-of-activity behaviors and increasing/strengthening the in-activity behaviors of students with intellectual disabilities. Social validity data collected from the teachers who implemented the application also showed that GBG was an effective and easy-to-implement classroom management strategy. In line with these findings, it is recommended to include GBG among the subjects of in-service teacher training and to conduct long-term further research with different student groups.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Good behavior game
• Group contingency
• Classroom management
• Student with intellectual disability
• Teacher education

Öğretmenlerin Uyguladıkları İyi Davranış Oyununun Özel Eğitim Okullarındaki Öğrencilerin Sınıf-İçi Davranışlarına Etkisi

Öz

Bu araştırmada özel eğitim uygulama okulunun ilkokul kademesinde bulunan zihinsel yetersizliği olan öğrencilerin sınıf içi davranışları üzerinde öğretmenlerin uyguladıkları “İyi Davranış Oyunu”nun (İDO) etkililiği incelenmiştir. Araştırmada tek denekli araştırma modellerinden katılımcılar arası yoklama denemeli çoklu yoklama modeli kullanılmıştır. Araştırmanın katılımcıları Millî Eğitim Bakanlığına (MEB) bağlı bir özel eğitim uygulama okulunda çalışan altı sınıf öğretmeni ile bu öğretmenlerin zihinsel yetersizliği olan öğrencileridir. Sınıf öğretmenlerine araştırmacılar tarafından “İDO Öğretmen Eğitimi Paketi” uygulanmıştır. Araştırmada başlama düzeyi ve İDO uygulama oturumlarından elde edilen veriler grafiksel olarak analiz edilmiştir. Araştırmanın etkililik bulguları, sınıfların birinci öğretmenlerinin uyguladıkları İDO’nun zihinsel yetersizliği olan öğrencilerin etkinlik dışı davranışlarının azalmasında ve etkinlik içi davranışlarının artmasında/güçlenmesinde etkili olduğu izlenimini vermektedir. Uygulamayı yapan öğretmenlerden toplanan sosyal geçerlik verileri de İDO’nun etkili ve uygulaması kolay bir sınıf yönetimi stratejisi olduğunu göstermektedir. Bu bulgular doğrultusunda MEB hizmet içi öğretmen eğitimi konuları arasına İDO’nun alınması ve farklı öğrenci gruplarıyla uzun vadeli ileri araştırmalar yapılması önerilmektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• İyi davranış oyunu
• Grup izlerliği
• Sınıf yönetimi
• Zihinsel yetersizliği olan öğrenci
• Öğretmen eğitimi

Kaynakça

1. Barrish, H. H., Saunders, M., & Wolf, M. M. (1969). Good behavior game: Effects of individual contingencies for group consequences on disruptive behavior in a classroom. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 2(2), 119-124. https://doi.org/10.1901/jaba.1969.2-119
2. Breeman, L. D., van Lier, P. A., Wubbels, T., Verhulst, F. C., van der Ende, J., Maras, A., ... & Tick, N. T. (2016). Effects of the Good Behavior Game on the behavioral, emotional, and social problems of children with psychiatric disorders in special education settings. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 18(3), 156-167. https://doi.org/10.1177/1098300715593466
3. Coronado-Hijón, A. (2009). Assessment of an educational behavioral management program. Electronic Journal of Research in Educational Psychology, 72(2), 805.
4. Dion, E., Roux, C., Landry, D., Fuchs, D., Wehby, J., & Dupéré, V. (2011). Improving attention and preventing reading difficulties among low-income first-graders: A randomized study. Prevention Science, 12(1), 70-79. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11121-010-0182-5 Embry, D. D. (2002). The Good Behavior Game: A best practice candidate as a universal behavioral vaccine. Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review, 5(4), 273-297.
5. Erbaş, D. (2018). Güvenirlik. E. Tekin-İftar (Ed.), Eğitim ve davranış bilimlerinde tek-denekli araştırmalar içinde (s. 2017-254). Ankara: Anı Yayıncılık.
6. Erbaş, D. & Yücesoy-Özkan, Ş. (2017). Uygulamalı davranış analizi. Ankara: Pegem Akademi.
7. Flower, A., McKenna, J. W., Bunuan, R. L., Muething, C. S., & Vega Jr, R. (2014). Effects of the Good Behavior Game on challenging behaviors in school settings. Review of Educational Research, 84(4), 546-571. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543145367
8. Galbraith, L. A. & Normand, M. P. (2017). Step it up! Using the good behavior game to increase physical activity with elementary school students at recess. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 50(4), 856-860. https://doi.org/10.1002/jaba.402

9. Groves, E. A. & Austin, J. L. (2017). An evaluation of interdependent and independent group contingencies during the good behavior game. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 50, 552–566. https://doi.org/10.1002/jaba.393
10. Groves, E. A. & Austin, J. L. (2019). Does the Good Behavior Game evoke negative peer pressure? Analysis in primary and secondary classrooms. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 52(1), 3-16. https://doi.org/10.1002/jaba.513
11. Groves, E. A., May, R. J., Rees, R. E., & Austin, J. L. (2022). Adapting the good behavior game for special education classrooms. Psychology in the Schools, 59(5), 1015-1031. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.22496
12. Hegerle, D. R., Kesecker, M. P., & Couch, J. V. (1979). A behavior game for the reduction of inappropriate classroom behaviors. School Psychology Review, 8(3), 339-343. https://doi.org/10.1080/02796015.1979.12086510
13. Hodnett, J. M. (2022). The impact of teachers’ treatment fidelity to the Good Behavior Game on problem behaviors exhibited within a self-contained classroom setting (Doctoral dissertation, University of South Florida).
14. Huber, H. (1979). The value of a behavior modification programme, administered in a fourth grade class of a remedial school. Praxis der Kinderpsychologie und Kinderpsychiatrie, 28, 73–79.
15. Joslyn, P. R., Vollmer, T. R., & Hernández, V. (2014). Implementation of the good behavior game in classrooms for children with delinquent behavior. Acta de Investigación Psicológica, 4, 1673–1682. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2007-4719(14)70973-1
16. Joslyn, P. R., Donaldson, J. M., Austin, J. L., & Vollmer, T. R. (2019). The good behavior game: A brief review. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 52, 811–815. https://doi.org/10.1002/jaba.572
17. Joslyn, P. R. & Vollmer, T. R. (2020). Efficacy of teacher‐implemented Good Behavior Game despite low treatment integrity. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 53(1), 465-474. https://doi.org/10.1002/jaba.614
18. Joslyn, P. R., Vollmer, T. R., & Kronfli, F. R. (2019). Interdependent group contingencies reduce disruption in alternative high school classrooms. Journal of Behavioral Education, 28, 423-434. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10864-019-09321-0
19. Joslyn, P. R. & Kronfli, F. R. (2021). Teacher-implemented Good Behavior Game with detained juvenile offenders. Education and Treatment of Children, 44(4), 269-274. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43494-021-00052-4
20. Kazdin, A. E. (1982). Single-case research designs: Methods for clinical and applied settings. New York: Oxford University.
21. Kosiec, L. E., Czernicki, M. R., & McLaughlin, T. F. (1986). The Good Behavior Game: A replication with consumer satisfaction in two regular elementary school classrooms. Techniques, 2, 15–23.
22. Köselioğlu, D. (2020). Kaynaştırma uygulamalarının yürütüldüğü okul öncesi sınıfında iyi davranış oyunu (İDO) uygulamasının etkililiğinin belirlenmesi. (Yüksek Lisans Tezi). http://tez.yok.gov.tr sayfasından erişilmiştir.
23. Krull, J., Paal, M., & Hintz, A. (2009). Effects of the Good Behavior Game on disruptive behavior during lunch break in a special school for students with EBD in Germany. Praxis der Kinderpsychologie und Kinderpsychiatrie, 52(7), 491-502.
24. Lee, K., Penrod, B., & Price, J. (2017). A comparison of cost and reward procedures with interdependent group contingencies. Behavior Modification, 41(1), 21–44. https://doi.org/10.1177/0145445516650964
25. Leflot, G., van Lier, P. A. C., Onghena, P., & Colpin, H. (2010). The role of teacher behavior management in the development of disruptive behaviors: An intervention study with the good behavior game. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology: An Official Publication of the International Society for Research in Child and Adolescent Psychopathology, 38(6), 869–882, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10802-010-9411-4
26. Maag, J. W. (2019). Why is the good behavior game used for bad behavior? Recommendations for using it for promoting good behavior. Beyond Behavior, 28(3), 168-176. https://doi.org/10.1177/1074295619870258
27. McGoey, K. E. & DuPaul, G. J. (2000). Token reinforcement and response cost procedures: Reducing the disruptive behavior of preschool children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. School Psychology Quarterly, 15(3), 330-342. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0088790
28. MEB. (2018). Özel eğitim hizmetleri yönetmeliği. Resmi Gazete, 26184. https://www.mevzuat.gov.tr/File/GeneratePdf?mevzuatNo=24736&mevzuatTur=KurumVeKurulusYonetmeligi&mevzuatTertip=5 sayfasından erişilmiştir.
29. Patrick, C. A., Ward, P., & Crouch, D. W. (1998). Effects of holding students accountable for social behaviors during volleyball games in elementary physical education. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 17(2), 143-156.
30. Pennington, B. & McComas, J. J. (2017). Effects of the Good Behavior Game across classroom contexts. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 50, 176–180. https://doi.org/10.1002/jaba.357
31. Pérez, V., Rodríguez, J., De la Barra, F., & Fernández, A. M. (2005). Efectividad de una estrategia conductual para el manejo de la agresividad en escolares de enseñanza básica. Psykhe (Santiago), 14(2), 55-62. http://dx.doi.org/10.4067/S0718-22282005000200005 Phillips, D. & Christie, F. (1986). Behaviour management in a secondary school classroom: Playing the game. Maladjustment & Therapeutic Education, 4(1), 47–53.
32. Rubow, C. C., Vollmer, T. R., & Joslyn, P. R. (2018). Effects of the Good Behavior Game on student and teacher behavior in an alternative school. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 51(2), 382-392. https://doi.org/10.1002/jaba.455
33. Ruiz‐Olivares, R., Pino, M. J., & Herruzo, J. (2010). Reduction of disruptive behaviors using an intervention based on the Good Behavior Game and the Say‐Do‐Report Correspondence. Psychology in the Schools, 47(10), 1046-1058. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.20523
34. Saigh, P. A. & Umar, A. M. (1983). The effects of a good behavior game on the disruptive behavior of Sudanese elementary school students. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 16(3), 339-344.
35. Salend, S. J., Reynolds, C. J., & Coyle, E. M. (1989). Individualizing the Good Behavior Game across type and frequency of behavior with emotionally disturbed adolescents. Behavior Modification, 13, 108–126. https://doi.org/10.1177/01454455890131007
36. Scruggs, T. E. & Mastropieri, M. A. (2001). How to summarize single-participant research: Ideas and applications. Exceptionality, 9(4), 227-244.
37. Silva, E. (2019). Evaluating the effects of and preference for positive and negative punishment in the Good Behavior Game. (Doctoral dissertation). https://scholarworks.calstate.edu/downloads/4f16c3659 sayasından erişilmiştir.
38. Silva, E. & Wiskow, K. M. (2020). Stimulus presentation versus stimulus removal in the Good Behavior Game. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 53(4), 2186-2198. https://doi.org/10.1002/jaba.709
39. Smith, S., Barajas, K., Ellis, B., Moore, C., McCauley, S., & Reichow, B. (2021). A meta-analytic review of randomized controlled trials of the good behavior game. Behavior Modification, 45(4), 641-666. https://doi.org/10.1177/0145445519878670
40. Sprute, K. A., Williams, R. L., & McLaughlin, T. F. (1990). Effects of a group response cost contingency procedure on the rate of classroom interruptions with emotionally disturbed secondary students. Child & Family Behavior Therapy, 12(2), 1-12. http://dx.doi.org/10.1300/J019v12n02_01
41. Sy, J. R., Gratz, O., & Donaldson, J. M. (2016). The good behavior game with students in alternative educational environments: Interactions between reinforcement criteria and scoring accuracy. Journal of Behavioral Education, 25(4), 455-477.
42. Tanol, G., Johnson, L., McComas, J., & Cote, E. (2010). Responding to rule violations or rule following: A comparison of two versions of the Good Behavior Game with kindergarten students. Journal of School Psychology, 48(5), 337-355.
43. Tawney, J. W. & Gast, D. L. (1984). Single subject research in special education. Columbus, OH: Merrill
44. Tekin-İftar, E. (2018). Çoklu yoklama modelleri. E. Tekin-İftar (Ed.), Eğitim ve davranış bilimlerinde tek-denekli araştırmalar içinde (s. 2017-254). Ankara: Anı.
45. Tekin-İftar, E. & Kırcaali-İftar G. (2006). Özel eğitimde yanlışsız öğretim yöntemleri. E. Tekin-İftar (Ed.), Güvenirlik içinde (s. 66-68). Ankara: Nobel.
46. Tingstrom, D. H. (1994). The good behavior game: An investigation of teachers' acceptance. Psychology in the Schools, 31(1), 57-65. https://doi.org/10.1002/1520-6807(199401)31:1<57::AID-PITS2310310108>3.0.CO;2-K
47. Van Lier, P. A., Muthén, B. O., van der Sar, R. M., & Crijnen, A. A. (2004). Preventing disruptive behavior in elementary schoolchildren: impact of a universal classroom-based intervention. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 72(3), 467.
48. Wiskow, K. M., Matter, A. L., & Donaldson, J. M. (2019). The Good Behavior Game in preschool classrooms: An evaluation of feedback. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 52(1), 105-115. https://doi.org/10.1002/jaba.500