The Relationship among Preservice Teachers' Perceived Personality Type, Teacher Self-Efficacy Beliefs, and Critical Thinking Attitudes

Öz

This study examined the relationship among pre-service teachers' perceived personality types, teacher self-efficacy and critical thinking attitude, and the role of critical thinking attitude in the relationship between perceived personality type and teacher self-efficacy. Based on the theoretical framework, a model was established among the variables in question and the suitability of the model and the direct and indirect relationships among the variables were revealed. A total of 317 pre-service teachers studying at a faculty of education in Central Anatolia participated in the study. The data were collected online through the Teacher Self-Efficacy Belief Scale, Five-Factor Personality Inventory, and Critical Thinking Attitude Scale. According to the research results, the relationship between critical thinking attitude and teacher self-efficacy was not statistically significant. On the other hand, there was a positive and significant relationship between personality type and critical thinking attitude. The total effect of perceived personality type on teaching self-efficacy was statistically significant. The total effect of perceived personality type on teaching self-efficacy was statistically significant. The mediating role of critical thinking attitude in the indirect effect between pre-service teachers' perceived personality type and teacher self-efficacy was statistically significant at 95% confidence interval.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Personality type
• Teacher self-efficacy
• Critical thinking attitude
• Pre-service teacher

Öğretmen Adaylarının Algıladıkları Kişilik Tipi, Öğretmen Öz-Yeterliği ve Eleştirel Düşünme Tutumları Arasındaki İlişki

Öz

Bu araştırma ile öğretmen adaylarının algıladıkları kişilik tipleri, öğretmen öz-yeterliği ve eleştirel düşünme tutumu arasındaki ilişki ve algılanan kişilik tipi ile öğretmen öz-yeterliği arasındaki ilişkide eleştirel düşünme tutumunun rolü incelenmiştir. Kuramsal çerçeveden hareketle söz konusu değişkenler arasında bir model kurulmuş ve modelin uygunluğu, değişkenler arasındaki doğrudan ve dolaylı ilişkiler ortaya konmuştur. Araştırmaya Orta Anadolu’da bir eğitim fakültesinde öğrenim görmekte olan 317 öğretmen adayı katılmıştır. Araştırma verileri Öğretmen Öz-Yeterlik İnancı Ölçeği, Beş Faktörlü Kişilik Envanteri ve Eleştirel Düşünme Tutum Ölçeği aracılığıyla çevrim içi olarak toplanmıştır. Araştırma sonuçlarına göre eleştirel düşünme tutumu ile öğretmen öz-yeterliği arasındaki ilişki istatistiksel olarak anlamlı değildir. Algılanan kişilik tipi ile eleştirel düşünme tutumu arasında pozitif yönde ve anlamlı bir ilişki vardır. Algılanan kişilik tipinin öğretmenlik öz-yeterliği üzerindeki toplam etkisi istatistiksel olarak anlamlıdır. Algılanan kişilik tipinin öğretmenlik öz-yeterliği üzerindeki toplam etkisi istatistiksel olarak anlamlıdır. Öğretmen adaylarının algıladıkları kişilik tipi ile öğretmen öz-yeterliği arasındaki dolaylı etkide eleştirel düşünme tutumunun aracılık rolü %95 güven aralığında istatistiksel olarak anlamlı bulunmuştur.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Kişilik tipi
• Öğretmen öz-yeterliği
• Eleştirel düşünme tutumu
• Öğretmen adayı

Kaynakça

1. Amirian, S., Ghaniabadi, S., Heydarnejad, T., & Abbasi, S. (2022). The contribution of critical thinking and self-efficacy beliefs to teaching style preferences in higher education. Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education, 15, 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1108/jarhe-11-2021-0441
2. Arce-Saavedra, B. & Blumen, S. (2022). Critical thinking, creativity, self-efficacy, and teaching practice in Peruvian teacher trainers. Revista de Psicología, 40(1), 603-633. https://doi.org/10.18800/psico.202201.020
3. Aşkar, P. & Umay, A. (2001). İlköğretim matematik öğretmenliği öğrencilerinin bilgisayarla ilgili öz-yeterlik algısı. Hacettepe University Journal of Education, 21(1), 1-8.
4. Atmaca, T. (2020). Öğretmenlerin kişilik tipleri ile mesleğe yabancılaşma arasındaki ilişki. Bolu Abant İzzet Baysal Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 20(1), 491-506. https://doi.org/10.17240/aibuefd.2020.20.52925-613930 Aygüneş, A. (2023). Beden eğitimi öğretmenlerinin öğretmen yeterliği ve problem çözme becerileri arasındaki ilişkinin incelenmesi. (Yüksek Lisans Tezi) http://tez.yok.gov.tr sayfasından erişilmiştir.
5. Bahar, H. H. & Kağan, M. (2018). Öğretmen adaylarında öz-yeterlik algılarının yordayıcısı olarak beş faktör kişilik özellikleri. Erzincan University Journal of Education, 20(3), 676-686.
6. Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. W. H. Freeman and Company.
7. Bauer, K. & Liang, Q. (2003). The effect of personality and precollege characteristics on first-year activities and academic performance. Journal of College Student Development, 44, 277-290. https://doi.org/10.1353/CSD.2003.0023
8. Benet-Martínez, V. & John, O. P. (1998). Los Cinco Grandes across cultures and ethnic groups: Multitrait-multimethod analyses of the Big Five in Spanish and English. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75(3), 729–750. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.75.3.729

9. Bentler, P. M. (1990). Comparative fit ındexes in structural models. Psychological Bulletin, 107, 238-246. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.107.2.238
10. Burger, J. (2016). Kişilik. Kaknüs.
11. Byrne, M. B. (2010). Structural equation modeling with Amos: Basic concepts, applications, and programming (3. b.). Taylor & Francis/Routledge.
12. Cansoy, R. & Türkoğlu, M. (2017). Examining the relationship between pre-service teachers’ critical thinking disposition, problem solving skills and teacher self-efficacy. International Education Studies, 10, 23-35. https://doi.org/10.5539/IES.V10N6P23
13. Chaplain, R. P. (2000). Beyond exam results? Differences in the social and psychological perceptions of young males and females at school. Educational Studies, 26(2), 177–190. https://doi.org/10.1080/713664271
14. Cheng, M. & Wan, Z. (2017). Exploring the effects of classroom learning environment on critical thinking skills and disposition: A study of Hong Kong 12th graders in Liberal Studies. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 24, 152-163. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.TSC.2017.03.001
15. Clifford, J., Boufal, M., & Kurtz, J. (2004). Personality traits and critical thinking skills in college students. Assessment, 11, 169-176. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191104263250
16. Costa, P. T. & McCrae, R. R. (1985). Domains and facets: Hierarchical personality assessment using the revised neo personality inventory. Journal of Personality Assessment, 64(1), 21-50.
17. Cousins, J. B. & Walker, C. A. (2000). Predictors of educators’ valuing of systemic inquiry in schools. Canadian Journal of Program Evaluation[Special Issue], 25–53.
18. Cüceloğlu, D. (2009). İnsan ve davranışı: Psikolojinin temel kavramları. Remzi.
19. Çapa, Y., Çakıroğlu, J., & Sarıkaya, H. (2005). The development and validation of a Turkish version of teachers’ sense of efficacy scale. Education and Science, 30(137), 74–81.
20. Çapık, C. (2014). Geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışmalarında doğrulayıcı faktör analizinin kullanımı. Journal of Anatolia Nursing and Health Sciences, 17(3), 196-205. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/download/article-file/29691 sayfasından erişilmiştir.
21. Çelikkol, A. K. & Konik, A. K. (2023). The role of critical thinking dispositions and depressive symptoms in predicting teacher candidates’ perceptions of ‘teacher self-efficacy’. African Educational Research Journal, 11(3), 293-299. https://doi.org/10.30918/aerj.113.23.047
22. Çokluk, Ö., Şekercioğlu, G., & Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2016). Sosyal bilimler için çok değişkenli istatistik: SPSS ve LISREL uygulamaları (4. b.). Pegem Akademi.
23. Dellinger, A. B., Bobbett, J. J., Olivier, D. F., Ellett, C. D. (2008). Measuring teachers’ self-efficacy beliefs: Development and use of the TEBS-Self. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24(3), 751-766. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2007.02.010
24. Demirdağ, S. (2015). The relationship between critical thinking abilities and classroom management skills of high school teachers. Educational Research Review, 10, 850-855. https://doi.org/10.5897/ERR2015.2173
25. Djigić, G., Stojiljković, S., & Dosković, M. (2014). Basic personality dimensions and teachers’ self-efficacy. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 112, 593-602. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SBSPRO.2014.01.1206
26. Eghtesadi, A. & Jeddi, A. (2019). Teachers’ critical thinking and self-efficacy as predictors of their pedagogical success. International Journal of Applied Linguistics and English Literature, 8, 62-70. https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.ijalel.v.8n.1p.62
27. Emir, S. (2012). Eğitim fakültesi öğrencilerinin eleştirel düşünme eğilimleri. HAYEF Journal of Education, 9(1), 34-57. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/download/article-file/93144 sayfasından erişilmiştir.
28. Eng, T. (2010). A study of personality type and thinking skill. 2010 International Conference on Science and Social Research (CSSR 2010) içinde (s. 335-340). https://doi.org/10.1109/CSSR.2010.5773795
29. Fisher, A. (2001). Critical thinking –An introduction. Cambridge University.
30. Gholami, A., Tabatabay, M., & Yazdai, F. (2015). Investigate the relationship between classroom management and human establishing relations with critical thinking. International Journal of Research in Social Sciences, 5, 141-150.
31. Güngör, F., Kurt, H., & Ekici, G. (2014). The relationship between personality types and self-efficacy perceptions of student teachers. Procedia- Social and Behavioral Sciences, 116, 786-790. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SBSPRO.2014.01.298
32. Hatipoğlu, F. & Özmen, H. (2024). Kişilik özellikleri bağlamında fen bilgisi öğretmen adaylarının eko-bilimsel düşünme alışkanlıklarının incelenmesi. Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Buca Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi(59), 435-459. https://doi.org/10.53444/deubefd.1381875
33. Henson, R. & Chambers, S. (2002). Personality type as a predictor of teaching efficacy and classroom control beliefs in emergency certification teachers. Education, 3(13), 124-261.
34. Hu, L. & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6(1), 1-55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118 Jöreskog, K. & Sörbom, D. (1993). LISREL 8: Structural equation modeling with the SIMPLIS command language. Scientific Software International.
35. Kazancı, O. (1989). Eğitimde eleştirel düşünme ve öğretimi. Kazancı.
36. Kim, L., Jörg, V., & Klassen, R. (2019). A meta-analysis of the effects of teacher personality on teacher effectiveness and burnout. Educational Psychology Review, 31, 163-195. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-018-9458-2
37. Kim, L., Dar-Nimrod, I., & MacCann, C. (2017). Teacher personality and teacher effectiveness in secondary school: Personality predicts teacher support and student self-efficacy but not academic achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 110, 309–323. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000217
38. Klassen, R. & Tze, V. (2014). Teachers’ self-efficacy, personality, and teaching effectiveness: A meta-analysis. Educational Research Review, 12, 59-76. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.EDUREV.2014.06.001
39. Kline, R. B. (2015). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (4. b.). Guilford.
40. Külahoğlu, S. (2000). İyi öğretmenlik yetenek mi, beceri mi? Eğitim Araştırmaları Dergisi, 2(1), 52-58.
41. Mason, M. (2007). Critical thinking and learning. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 39(4), 339–349. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-5812.2007.00343.x
42. MAnzoor, E. (2019). Prospective teachers’ critical thinking disposition, problem solving skills and self-efficacy: A relationship study in Pakistan. Pakistan Social Sciences Review, 3(2), 687-696. https://doi.org/10.35484/pssr.2019(3-2)53
43. Meydan, C. H. & Şeşen, H. (2015). Yapısal eşitlik modellemesi AMOS uygulamaları (2. b.). Detay.
44. Moslemi, N. & Habibi, P. (2019). The relationship among Iranian EFL teachers’ professional ıdentity, self-efficacy and critical thinking skills. HOW, 26(1), 107-128. https://doi.org/10.19183/HOW.26.1.483
45. Mohseni, A. & Omrani, H. (2016). The relationship among self-efficacy, critical thinking and professional success of Iranian EFL teachers. Modern Journal of Language Teaching Methods, 6, 8-22. https://mjltm.org/article-1-253-en.pdf sayfasından erişilmiştir.
46. Nosratinia, M. (2013). The role of personality traits in predicting EFL learners’ critical thinking skills: A study on psychological characteristics of EFL learners. IOSR Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 13, 89-93. https://doi.org/10.9790/0837-1368993
47. Perera, H., Granziera, H., & McIlveen, P. (2018). Profiles of teacher personality and relations with teacher self-efficacy, work engagement, and job satisfaction. Personality and Individual Differences, 120, 171-178. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.PAID.2017.08.034
48. Ramdani, Z., Tae, L., Prakoso, B., & Luanganggoon, N. (2021). Personality trait, self-efficacy, and ındividual work performance on science teachers in Indonesia. Proceedings of the International Conference on Educational Assessment and Policy (ICEAP 2020) içinde (s. 16-21). https://doi.org/10.2991/ASSEHR.K.210423.058
49. Roberts, T., Mowen, D., Edgar, D., Harlin, J., & Briers, G. (2007). Relationships between personality type and teaching efficacy of student teachers. Journal of Agricultural Education, 48, 92-102. https://doi.org/10.5032/JAE.2007.02092
50. Senemoğlu, N. (2007). Gelişim öğrenme ve öğretme kuramdan uygulamaya. Gönül.
51. Schumacker, R. E. & Lomax, R. G. (2004). A beginner's guide to structural equation modeling (2. b.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
52. Shangarffam, N. & Poshti, N. (2010). The relationship among EFL teachers’ critical thinking, self-efficacy, and their perception of effective teaching. Applied Linguistics, 4, 175-207.
53. Siddiqui, K. (2013). Heuristics for sample size determination in multivariate statistical techniques. World Applied Sciences Journal, 27(2), 285-287. https://doi.org/10.5829/idosi.wasj.2013.27.02.889
54. Siegel, H. (2017). Education's epistemology: Rationality, diversity, and critical thinking. Oxford University.
55. Sümer, N. (2000). Yapısal eşitlik modelleri. Türk Psikoloji Yazıları, 3(6), 49-74. http://www.nebisumer.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/SumerN.2000.YEM_TPY.pdf sayfasından erişilmiştir.
56. Sümer, N., Lajunen, T., & Özkan, T. (2005). Big five personality traits as the distal predictors of road accident involvement. G. Underwood (Ed.), Traffic and transport psychology içinde (s. 215-227). Elsevier.
57. Sürücü, A. & Ünal, A. (2018). Öğrenci motivasyonunu artıran ve azaltan öğretmen davranışlarının incelenmesi. Opus: Uluslararası Toplum Araştırmaları Dergisi, 8(14), 253-295. https://doi.org/10.26466/opus.404122
58. Şenler, B. & Sungur-Vural, S. (2013). Pre-service science teachers’ teaching self-efficacy in relation to personality traits and academic self-regulation. The Spanish Journal of Psychology, 16, 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1017/sjp.2013.22
59. Tabachnick, B. G. & Fidell, L. S. (2013). Using multivariate statistics (6. b.). Pearson.
60. TDK. (2025). Kişilik. Güncel Türkçe Sözlük. https://sozluk.gov.tr/ sayfasından erişilmiştir.
61. Tschannen-Moran., M. & Woolfolk-Hoy, A. (2001). Teacher efficacy: Capturing an elusive construct. Teaching and Teacher Education, 17(7), 783-805.
62. Turabik, T. & Gün, F. (2016). The relationship between teachers' democratic classroom management attitudes and students' critical thinking dispositions. Journal of Education and Training Studies, 4, 45-57. https://doi.org/10.11114/JETS.V4I12.1901
63. Yılmaz, H. (2023). Okul öncesi öğretmen adaylarının yaratıcı kişilik özellikleri ile yaratıcı düşünme eğilimleri ve eleştirel düşünme eğilimleri. Batı Anadolu Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi, 14(2), 1412-1430. https://doi.org/10.51460/baebd.1363259
64. Zangenehvandi, M., Farahian, M., Branch, K., & Gholami, H. (2014). On the relationship between EFL teachers' critical thinking and self-efficacy. Modern Journal of Language Teaching Methods, 4, 271-286.
65. Zee, M. & Koomen, H. (2016). Teacher self-efficacy and its effects on classroom processes, student academic adjustment, and teacher well-being. Review of Educational Research, 86, 1015-981. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654315626801