Pre-Service Elementary School Teachers’ Skills of Designing Model-Eliciting Activity and Their Reflective Views

Öz

This study aimed to determine the skills of pre-service elementary school teachers in designing model-eliciting activity for elementary school students and their reflective views on the model-eliciting activities they designed. The research was carried out within the scope of qualitative research method. The study group consisted of 25 pre-service elementary school teachers. The model-eliciting activities designed by the pre-service elementary school teachers and the reflective views of the pre-service elementary school teachers on these activities were the data collection tools of the research. Model-eliciting activities designed by pre-service elementary teachers were analysed using the evaluation form created by Tekin Dede et al. (2017). Their reflective views were analysed using the reflective thinking model created by Artzt and Armour-Thomas (1999). According to the results obtained, pre-service elementary school teachers designed activities partially in accordance with the principles of construct documentation, model generalization and effective prototype. The reflective views of the pre-service elementary school teachers regarding the model-eliciting activities they designed were that they had difficulty in establishing a connection between mathematics and real life, designing a problem situation, solving the problem they designed, and creating a context for the problem situation.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Model eliciting activity
• Mathematical modeling
• Pre-service elementary school teachers
• Elementary school

Sınıf Öğretmeni Adaylarının Model Oluşturma Etkinliği Tasarlama Becerileri ve Yansıtıcı Görüşleri

Öz

Bu çalışmada sınıf öğretmeni adaylarının ilkokul öğrencilerine yönelik model oluşturma etkinliği tasarlama becerileri ve tasarladıkları model oluşturma etkinliklerine ilişkin yansıtıcı görüşlerinin belirlenmesi amaçlanmıştır. Araştırma, nitel araştırma yöntemi kapsamında gerçekleştirilmiştir. Araştırma Türkiye’nin güneyinde yer alan bir devlet üniversitesinin Sınıf Eğitimi Ana Bilim Dalının üçüncü sınıfında öğrenim gören 25 sınıf öğretmeni adayı ile gerçekleştirilmiştir. Sınıf öğretmeni adayları tarafından tasarlanan model oluşturma etkinlikleri ve öğretmen adaylarının bu etkinliklere yönelik yansıtıcı görüşleri, araştırmanın veri toplama araçlarıdır. Sınıf öğretmeni adaylarının tasarladıkları model oluşturma etkinlikleri, Tekin Dede vd. (2017) tarafından oluşturulan değerlendirme formuna; yansıtıcı görüşleri ise Artzt ve Armour-Thomas (1999) tarafından oluşturulan yansıtıcı düşünme modeline göre betimsel ve içerik analizi yapılmıştır. Elde edilen sonuçlara göre sınıf öğretmeni adayları etkinlik tasarlarken yapı belgelendirme, model genelleme ve etkili prototip prensiplerine kısmen uygun etkinlikler tasarlamışlardır. Sınıf öğretmeni adaylarının tasarladıkları model oluşturma etkinliklerine ilişkin yansıtıcı görüşlerinde ise matematik ve gerçek yaşam ilişkisi kurma, problem durumu tasarlama, tasarladıkları problemi çözme ve problem durumu için bağlam oluşturma süreçlerinde zorlandıkları görüşleri dikkat çeken bulgular arasında yer almaktadır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Model oluşturma etkinliği
• Matematiksel modelleme
• Sınıf öğretmeni adayı
• İlkokul

Kaynakça

1. Albayrak, H. B. & Efendioğlu, A. (2023). Sınıf öğretmenleri ve sınıf öğretmeni adaylarının görüşlerinden matematiksel modelleme. Mehmet Akif Ersoy University Journal of Education Faculty, 65, 38-70. https://doi.org/10.21764/maeuefd.1013373
2. Artzt, A. F. & Armour-Thomas, E. (1999). A cognitive model for examining teachers’ instructional practice in mathematics: A guide for facilitating teacher reflection. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 40(3), 211-235. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1003871918392 Asempapa, R. S. (2015). Mathematical modeling: Essential for elementary and middle school students. Journal of Mathematics Education, 8(1), 16-29.
3. Ball, D. L., Thames, M. H., & Phelps, G. (2008). Content knowledge for teaching: What makes it special. Journal of Teacher Education, 59(5), 389-407. https://doi.org/10.1177/00224871083245544
4. Biccard, P. (2010). An investigation into the development of mathematical modelling competencies of grade 7 learners. (Yüksek Lisans Tezi). https://scholar.sun.ac.za/server/api/core/bitstreams/2cee33ad-2eda-4a94-8481-45b1e1bff0f4/content sayfasından erişilmiştir.
5. Bilgili, S. & Çiltaş, A. (2022). Matematik öğretmeni adaylarının matematiksel modelleme etkinliği oluşturma süreçleri ve sürecin öğretim deneyimlerine yansımaları. Bayburt Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 17(34), 559-585. https://doi.org/10.35675/befdergi.897100
6. Blomhoj, M. & Kjeldsen, T. H. (2006). Teaching mathematical modelling through project work. The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 38(2), 163-177. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02655887
7. Blum, W. & Borromeo-Ferri, R. (2009). Mathematical modelling: Can it be taught and learnt? Journal of Mathematical Modelling and Application, 1(1), 45-58.
8. Blum, W. (1991). Applications and modelling in mathematics teaching - A review of arguments and instructional aspects. M. Niss, W. Blum, & I. Huntley (Ed.), Teaching of mathematical modelling and applications içinde (s. 10-29). Ellis Horwood.

9. Blum, W. (2002). ICMI Study 14: Applications and modelling in mathematics education-Discussion document. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 51(1), 149-171. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022435827400
10. Blum, W. (2011). Can modelling be taught and learnt? Some answers from empirical research. G. Kaiser, W. Blum, R. Borromeo-Ferri, & G. Stillman (Ed.), Trends in teaching and learning of mathematical modelling içinde (s. 15-30). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-0910-23
11. Blum, W. (2015). Quality teaching of mathematical modelling: What do we know? What can we do? S. J. Cho (Ed.), The Proceedings of the 12th International Congress on Mathematical Education-Intellectual and Attitudinal Challenges içinde (s. 73-96). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-12688-3
12. Bonotto, C. (2007). How to replace word problems with activities of realistic mathematical modelling. W. Blum, P. L. Galbraith, H. W. Henn, & M. Niss (Ed.), Modelling and applications in mathematics education: The 14th ICMI study içinde (s. 185-192). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-29822-1_18
13. Borromeo-Ferri, R. & Blum, W. (2010). Mathematical modelling in teacher education – Experiences from a modelling seminar. V. Durand-Guerrier, S. Soury-Lavergne, & F. Arzarello (Ed.), Proceedings of the Sixth Congress of the European Society for Research in Mathematics Education (CERME 6) içinde (s. 2046– 2055). Institut National de Recherche Pédagogique.
14. Borromeo-Ferri, R. (2018). Learning how to teach mathematical modelling in school and teacher education. Springer International. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-68072-9
15. Bukova-Güzel, E. (2011). An examination of pre-service mathematics teachers’ approaches to cunstruct and solve mathematical modelling problems. Teaching Modelling and Its Applications, 39, 19-36. https://doi.org/10.1093/teamat/hrq015
16. Canbazoğlu-Albayrak, H. B. & Bukova-Güzel, E. (2024). Bir ilkokul dördüncü sınıf öğrencisinin bilişsel matematiksel modelleme yeterliklerinin geliştirilmesi: Ayrıntılı geri bildirim. Pamukkale Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi [PAÜEFD], 62, 29-71. https://doi.org/10.9779/pauefd.1290603
17. Canbazoğlu-Albayrak, H. B. & Tarım, K. (2023). Cognitive mathematical modelling competencies of elementary school students. SDU International Journal of Educational Studies, 10(1), 1-21. https://doi.org/10.33710/sduijes.1191490
18. Carlson, M. A., Wickstrom, M. H., Burroughs, E. A., & Fulton, E. W. (2016). A case for mathematical modeling in the elementary school classroom. C. R. Hirsch & A. R. McDuffie (Ed.), Mathematical modeling and modeling mathematics içinde (s. 121-129). National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
19. Carpenter, T. P. & Romberg, T. A. (2004). Powerful practices in mathematics and science. National Center for Improving Student Learning and Achievement in Mathematics and Science.
20. Chamberlin, S. A. & Moon, S. M. (2005). Model-eliciting activities as a tool to develop and identify creatively gifted mathematicians. Journal of Secondary Gifted Education, 17(1), 37-47. https://doi.org/10.4219/jsge-2005-393
21. Chamberlin, S. A. & Moon, S. M. (2008). How does the problem based learning approach compare to the model-eliciting activity approach in mathematics. International Journal for Mathematics Teaching and Learning, 9(3), 78-105.
22. Chan, C. M. E., Ng, K. E. D., Widjaja, W., & Seto, C. (2012). Assessment of elementary 5 students’ mathematical modelling competencies. Journal of Science and Mathematics Education in Southeast Asia, 35(2), 146-178.
23. Crespo, S. & Sinclair, N. (2008). What makes a problem mathematically interesting? Inviting prospective teachers to pose better problems. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education 11, 395–415. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-008-9081-0
24. Deniz, D. & Akgün, L. (2014). Ortaöğretim öğrencilerinin matematiksel modelleme yönteminin sınıf içi uygulamalarına yönelik görüşleri. Trakya Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 4(1), 103-116.
25. Deniz, D. & Akgün, L. (2016). The sufficiency of high school mathematics teachers’ to design activities appropriate to model eliciting activities design principles. Karaelmas Journal of Educational Sciences, 4, 1-14.
26. Deniz, D. & Akgün, L. (2017). Ortaöğretim matematik öğretmenlerinin matematiksel modelleme yöntemi ve uygulamalarına yönelik görüşleri. Anemon Muş Alparslan Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 5(1), 95-117. https://doi.org/10.18506/anemon.272677
27. Doğan, M. F. (2020). Evaluating pre-service teachers’ design of mathematical modelling tasks. International Journal of Innovation in Science and Mathematics Education, 28(1), 44-59. https://doi.org/10.30722/IJISME.28.01.004
28. English, L. & Watters, J. J. (2004). Mathematical modelling with young children. International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, 2, 335-342.
29. English, L. D. (2014). Promoting statistical literacy through data modelling in the early school years. E. Chernoff & B. Sriraman (Ed.), Probabilistic thinking: Presenting plural perspectives içinde (s. 441-458). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7155-0_23
30. English, L. D. (2021). Mathematical and interdisciplinary modeling in optimizing young children’s learning. J. M. Suh, M. H. Wickstrom, & L. D. English (Ed.), Exploring mathematical modeling with young learners içinde (s. 3-23). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-63900-6_1
31. Eraslan, A. (2011). İlköğretim matematik öğretmen adaylarının model oluşturma etkinlikleri ve bunların matematik öğrenimine etkisi hakkındaki görüşleri. Elementary Education Online, 10(1), 364-377.
32. Fox, J. (2006). A justification for mathematical modelling experiences in the preparatory classroom. P. Grootenboer, R. Zevenbergen, & M. Chinnappan (Ed.), Proceedings of the 29th Annual Conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia içinde (s. 221-228). MERGA.
33. Frejd, P. (2012). Modelling assessment of mathematical modelling–A literature review. MADIF-8: Evaluation and Comparison of Mathematical Achievement, Umeå, Sweden içinde (s. 81-90). Svensk förening för Matematik Didaktisk Forskning-SMDF.
34. Galbraith, P. (2007). Dreaming a “possible dream”: More winmills to conquer. C. Haines, P. Galbraith, W. Blum, & S. Khan (Ed.), Mathematical modelling: Education, engineering and economics içinde (s. 44-62). Horwood.
35. Garcia, F. J. & Ruiz-Higueras, L. (2010). Exploring the use of theoretical frameworks for modelling-oriented instructional design. The Sixth Congress of the European Society for Research in Mathematics Education’da (CERME) sunulmuş bildiri, Ocak, Lyon, Fransa.
36. Greer, B., Verschaffel, L., & Mukhopadhyay, S. (2007). Modeling for life: Mathematics and children’s experience. W. Blum, W. Henne, & M. Niss (Ed.), Applications and modeling in mathematics education (ICMI study 14) içinde (s. 89-98). Kluwer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-29822-1_7
37. Guerrero-Ortiz, C. & Camacho-Machín, M. (2022). Design modelling tasks in digital environments. The Twelfth Congress of the European Society for Research in Mathematics Education’da sunulmuş bildiri, 2-7 Şubat, Bozen-Bolzano, İtalya.
38. Haas, B., Kreis, Y., & Lavicza, Z. (2020). Connecting the real world to mathematical models in elementary schools in Luxemburg. Proceedings of the British Society for Research into Learning Mathematics, 40(2), 1-6.
39. Haines C. & Crouch R. (2007). Mathematical modelling and applications: Ability and competence frameworks. W. Blum, P. L. Galbraith, H. W. Henn, & M. Niss (Ed.), Modelling and applications in mathematics education içinde (s. 417-424). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-29822-1_46
40. Hošpesová, A. & Tichá, M. (2015) Problem posing in elementary school teacher training. F. M. Singer, N. F. Ellerton, & J. Cai (Ed.), Mathematical problem posing içinde (s. 433-447). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-6258-3_21
41. Işık, A. & Mercan, E. (2015). Ortaokul matematik öğretmenlerinin model ve modelleme hakkındaki görüşlerinin incelenmesi. Kastamonu Üniversitesi Kastamonu Eğitim Dergisi, 23(4), 1835-1850.
42. İncikabı, S. & Biber, A. (2020). Ortaokul matematik öğretmen adaylarının matematiksel model oluşturma etkinliklerine yönelik değerlendirmeleri. Medeniyet Eğitim Araştırmaları Dergisi, 4(1), 10-27.
43. Kang, O. & Noh, J. (2012). Teaching mathematical modelling in school mathematics. The 12th International Congress on Mathematical Education’da sunulmuş bildiri, Temmuz, Seoul, Kore.
44. Kawasaki, T., Moriya, S., Okabe, Y., & Maesako T. (2012). The problems of mathematical modelling introduction on mathematics education in Japanese school. Journal of Mathematical Modelling and Application, 1(5), 50-58.
45. Kim, S. H. & Kim, S. (2010). The effects of mathematical modeling on creative production ability and self-directed learning attitude. Asia Pacific Education Review, 11, 109-120. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-009-9052-x
46. Kula-Ünver, S. K., Hıdıroğlu, Ç. N., Tekin-Dede, A., & Bukova-Güzel, E. (2018). Factors revealed while posing mathematical modelling problems by mathematics student teachers. European Journal of Educational Research, 7(4), 941-952. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.7.4.941
47. Leavy, A. & Hourigan, M. (2018). The role of perceptual similarity, context, and situation when selecting attributes: Considerations made by 5-6-year-olds in data modeling environments. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 97, 163-183. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-017-9791-2
48. Lesh, R. A. & Doerr, H. M. (2003a). Foundations of a models and modeling perspective on mathematics teaching and learning. R. A. Lesh, & H. Doerr (Ed.), Beyond constructivism: Models and modeling perspectives on mathematics problem solving, learning, and teaching içinde (s. 3-34). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781410607713
49. Lesh, R. & Doerr, H. M. (2003b). Moving beyond constructivism. R. Lesh & H. M. Doerr (Ed.), Beyond constructivism: Models and modeling perspectives on mathematics problem solving, learning and teaching içinde (s. 519-556). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
50. Lesh, R. A. & Zawojewski, J. S. (2007). Problem solving and modeling. F. Lester (Ed.), Second handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning: A project of the national council of teachers of mathematics içinde (s. 763-804). Information Age.
51. Lesh, R. & Caylor, B. (2007). Introduction to the special issue: Modeling as application versus modeling as a way to create mathematics. International Journal of computers for mathematical Learning, 12(3), 173-194.
52. Lesh, R., Hoover, M., Hole, B., Kelly, A., & Post, T. (2000). Principles for developing thought-revealing activities for students and teachers. A. E. Kelly, & R. A. Lesh (Ed.), Handbook of research design in mathematics and science education içinde (s. 591-646). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
53. Liljedahl, P., Chernoff, E., & Zazkis, R. (2007). Interweaving mathematics and pedagogy in task design: A tale of one task. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 10, 239-249. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-007-9047-7 Lingefjärd, T. (2007). Mathematical modelling in teacher education-Necessity or unnecessarily. Modelling and applications in mathematics education içinde (s. 333-340). Springer.
54. Maaß, K. (2006). What are modelling competencies? ZDM, 38(2), 113-142. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02655885 Maaß, K. (2011). Identifying drivers for mathematical modelling-a commentary. G. Kaiser, W. Blum, R. B. Ferri, & G. Stillman (Ed.), Trends in teaching and learning of mathematical modelling: ICTMA 14 içinde (s. 367-373). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-0910-2_36
55. MEB. (2024). İlkokul Matematik (1, 2, 3 ve 4. Sınıflar) Dersi Öğretim Programı. MEB. https://mufredat.meb.gov.tr sayfasından erişilmiştir.
56. Miles, M. B. & Huberman, A. M. (2016). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. Sage.
57. Ng, K. E. D. (2013). Teacher readiness in mathematical modelling: Are there differences between pre-service and in-service teachers? G. A. Stillman, G. Kaiser, W. Blum, & J. P. Brown (Ed.), Teaching mathematical modelling: Connecting to research and practice içinde (s. 339-348). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6540-5_28
58. Niss, M., Blum, W., & Galbraith, P. (2007). Introduction. W. Blum, P. Galbraith, H. W. Henn, & M. Niss (Ed.), Modelling and applications in mathematics education: The 14th ICMI study içinde (s. 3-32). Springer Science + Business Media.
59. Osana, H. P. & Pelczer, I. (2015). A review on problem posing in teacher education. F. F. Singer, N. Ellerton, & J. Cai (Ed.). Mathematical problem posing: Research in mathematics education içinde (s. 469-492). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-6258-3_23
60. P21. (2020). A Report and Mile Guide for 21st Century Skills. https://www.battelleforkids.org/networks/p21 sayfasından erişilmiştir.
61. Paolucci, C. & Wessels, H. (2017). An examination of preservice teachers’ capacity to create mathematical modeling problems for children. Journal of Teacher Education, 68(3), 330-344. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487117697636
62. Pilten, P., Serin, M. K., & Işık, N. (2016). Sınıf öğretmenlerinin matematiksel modellemeye ilişkin algılarını belirlemeye yönelik bir olgubilim çalışması. Electronic Turkish Studies, 11(3), 1919-1934.
63. Schwarz, B. & Kaiser, G. (2007). Mathematical modelling in school-experiences from a project integrating school and university. D. Pitta-Pantazi & G. Philippou (Ed.), Proceedings of the Fifth Congress of the European Society for Research in Mathematics Education içinde (s. 2180–2189). University of Cyprus.
64. Soon, T. L. & Cheng, A. K. (2013). Pre-service secondary school teachers’ knowledge in mathematical modelling. G. A. Stillman, G. Kaiser, W. Blum, & J. P. Brown (Ed.), Teaching mathematical modelling: Connecting to research and practice içinde (s. 373-383). Springer.
65. Steen, L. A., Turner, R., & Burkhardt, H. (2007). Developing mathematical literacy. Modelling and applications in mathematics education: The 14th ICMI study içinde (s. 285-294). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-29822-1_30
66. Suh, J. M., Matson, K., & Seshaiyer, P. (2017). Engaging elementary students in the creative process of mathematizing their world through mathematical modeling. Education Sciences, 7(2), 61-83. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci7020062
67. Suh, J., Matson, K., Seshaiyer, P., Jamieson, S., & Tate, H. (2021). Mathematical modelling as a catalyst for equitable mathematics instruction: Preparing teachers and young learners with 21st century skills. Mathematics, 9(2), 162. https://doi.org/10.3390/math9020162
68. Şahin, N. & Eraslan, A. (2016). İlkokul öğrencilerinin modelleme süreçleri: Suç problemi. Eğitim ve Bilim, 41(183), 47-67. http://dx.doi.org/10.15390/EB.2016.6011
69. Şahin, N. & Eraslan, A. (2017). Fourth-grade elementary school students’ thought processes and challenges encountered during the butter beans problem. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 17(1), 105-127. https://doi.org/10.12738/estp.2017.1.0038
70. Şahin, N. & Eraslan, A. (2018). İlkokulda model oluşturma etkinlikleri nasıl uygulanmalı? Eğitim Kuram ve Uygulama Araştırmaları Dergisi, 4(1), 99-117.
71. Şahin, N. & Eraslan, A. (2019). Ortaokul matematik öğretmeni adaylarının matematik uygulamaları dersinde modelleme etkinliklerinin kullanılmasına yönelik görüşleri. Türk Bilgisayar ve Matematik Eğitimi Dergisi, 10(2), 373-393. https://doi.org/10.16949/turkbilmat.434641
72. Şahin, S., Gürbüz, R., & Doğan, M. F. (2023). Investigating mathematical modeling problem designing process of inservice mathematics teachers. Cukurova University Faculty of Education Journal, 52(1), 33-70. https://doi.org/10.14812/cuefd.1033080
73. Şen, E. Ö. (2020). Öğretmen adaylarının tasarladıkları matematiksel modelleme problemleri ve tasarlama sürecine ilişkin görüşleri. Kırşehir Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 21(3), 1530-1560. https://doi.org/10.29299/kefad.8539966
74. Tekin-Dede, A. & Bukova-Güzel, E. (2014). Model oluşturma etkinlikleri: Kuramsal yapısı ve bir örneği. Ondokuz Mayis University Journal of Education Faculty, 33(1), 95-111.
75. Tekin-Dede, A., & Bukova-Güzel, E. (2013). Matematik öğretmenlerinin model oluşturma etkinliği tasarım süreçleri ve etkinliklere yönelik görüşleri. Bartın University Journal of Faculty of Education, 2(1), 300-322.
76. Tekin-Dede, A. & Yılmaz, S. (2013). İlköğretim matematik öğretmeni adaylarının modelleme yeterliliklerinin incelenmesi. Turkish Journal of Computer and Mathematics Education (TURCOMAT), 4(3), 185-206.
77. Tekin-Dede, A., Hıdıroğlu, Ç. N., & Bukova-Güzel, E. (2017). Examining of model eliciting activities developed by mathematics student teachers. Journal on Mathematics Education, 8(2), 223-242. http://dx.doi.org/10.22342/jme.8.2.3997.223-242
78. Tekin, A. (2012). Matematik öğretmenlerinin model oluşturma etkinliği tasarım süreçleri ve etkinliklere yönelik görüşleri. (Yüksek Lisans Tezi). http://tez.yok.gov.tr sayfasından erişilmiştir.
79. Thomas, K. & Hart, J. (2010). Pre-service teacher perceptions of model eliciting activities. R. Lesh, P. L. Galbraith, C. R. Haines, & A. Hurford (Ed.), Modeling students’ mathematical modeling competencies içinde (s. 531-539). Springer Science & Business Media. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-0561-1_46
80. Tran, D. & Dougherty, B. J. (2014). Authenticity of mathematical modeling. The Mathematics Teacher, 107(9), 672-678. https://doi.org/10.5951/mathteacher.107.9.0672
81. Ulu, M. (2017). Examining the mathematical modeling processes of elementary school 4th-grade students: Shopping problem. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 5(4), 561-580. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2017.050406
82. Urhan, S. & Dost, Ş. (2016). Matematiksel modelleme etkinliklerinin derslerde kullanımı: Öğretmen görüşleri. Elektronik Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 15(59), 1279-1295. https://doi.org/10.17755/esosder.263231
83. Verschaffel, L., De Corte, E., & Vierstraete, H. (1999). Upper elementary school pupils’ difficulties in modeling and solving nonstandard additive word problems involving ordinal numbers. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 30(3), 265-285. https://doi.org/10.2307/749836
84. Verschaffel, L., Greer, B., & De Corte, E. (2000). Making sense of word problems. Swets & Zeitlinger.
85. Watters, J. J., English, L. D., & Mahoney, S. (2004). Mathematical modeling in the elementary school. American Educational Research Association Annual Meeting içinde (s. 1-12). San Diego.
86. Yamane, T. (2009). Temel örnekleme yöntemleri. Literatür.
87. Yanık, H. B., Bağdat, O., & Koparan, M. (2017). Ortaokul öğretmen adaylarının matematiksel modelleme problemlerine yönelik görüşlerinin incelenmesi. Eğitimde Nitel Araştırmalar Dergisi-Journal of Qualitative Research in Education, 5(1), 80-101.
88. Yin, R. K. (2017). Applications of case study research. Nobel Akademi.
89. Yitmez, B. G., Tekin-Dede, A., & Yılmaz, S. (2024). Investigation of modeling problems adapted by pre-service mathematics teachers from textbooks. Trakya Journal of Education, 14(2), 842-864. https://doi.org/10.24315tred.1394375
90. Yu, S. Y. & Chang, C. K. (2011). What did Taiwan mathematics teachers think of model-eliciting activities and modelling teaching? G. Kaiser, W. Blum, R. Borromeo-Ferri, & G. Stillman (Ed.), Trends in teaching and learning of mathematical modelling içinde (s. 147-156). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-0910-2_16
91. Zawojevski, S. J., Lesh, R. A., & English, L. D. (2003). A models and modeling perspective on the role of small group learning activities. R. A. Lesh & H. M. Doerr (Ed.), Beyond constructivism: A models and modeling perspective on mathematics problem solving, learning and teaching içinde (s. 337-358). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
92. Zbiek, R. M. (2016). Supporting teachers’ development as modelers and teachers of modelers. C. R. Hirsch (Ed), Annual perspectives in mathematics education (APME) 2016: Mathematical modeling and modeling mathematics içinde (s. 263-272). National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.