ÜRETKEN YAPAY ZEKÂ MODELLERİNİN EĞİTİMİNDE KULLANILAN İÇERİKLERİN TELİF HAKKI İHLALİ: ABD’DEKİ GÜNCEL DAVALAR IŞIĞINDA KARŞILAŞTIRMALI BİR İNCELEME
Öz
Anahtar Kelimeler
Yapay zekâ, telif hakları, üretken yapay zekâ, adil kullanım, metin ve veri madenciliği, karşılaştırmalı hukuk
Kaynakça
- Akın İ, Dijital Telif Hukuku (1 bs, Seçkin Yayıncılık 2022)
- Blockx F, ‘Reading Tea Leaves Differently?’ içinde Rosati E (ed), The Routledge Handbook of EU Copyright Law (1 bs, Routledge 2021)
- Chesterman S, ‘Good Models Borrow, Great Models Steal: Intellectual Property Rights and Generative AI’ (2024) NUS Law Working Paper No 2023/025
- Coulter M, ‘Aiming for Fairness: An Exploration into Getty Images v. Stability AI and Its Importance in the Landscape of Modern Copyright Law’ (2024) 34 Intellectual Property Law
- Engle EA, ‘When Is Fair Use Fair?: A Comparison of E.U. and U.S. Intellectual Property Law’ (2002) 15 Transnational Lawyer
- Geiger C, Gervais DJ ve Senftleben M, ‘Understanding the "Three-Step Test" içinde Gervais DJ (ed), International Intellectual Property (Edward Elgar Publishing 2015)
- Helvacı S ve Atar EA, ‘Fikir ve Sanat Eserleri Hukukunda Üç Aşamalı Test’ (2016) 22 Marmara Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Hukuk Araştırmaları Dergisi 1289
- Kahveci, Z Ü, “Attribution Problem of Generative AI: A View from US Copyright Law.” Journal of Intellectual Property Law and Practice 18 (2023): 796–802.
- Lee K, Cooper F A, ve Grimmelmann J. “Talkin’ ’Bout AI Generation: Copyright and the Generative-AI Supply Chain (The Short Version).” In Proceedings of the Symposium on Computer Science and Law, (2024) 54.
- Mantegna, M, “ARTificial: Why Copyright Is Not the Right Policy Tool to Deal with Generative AI.” SSRN Electronic Journal, 2025.