ERGENLERİN KİŞİLİK ÖZELLİKLERİNİN SALDIRGANLIK DÜZEYLERİ ÜZERİNDEKİ YORDAYICI ETKİSİ

Öz

Bu araştırmada, ergenlerin kişilik özelliklerinin saldırganlık düzeyleri üzerindeki yordayıcı etkisini incelemek amaçlanmıştır. Araştırmaya, farklı lise türlerinde öğrenim görmekte olan toplam 1235 ergen katılmıştır. Araştırmanın verilerinin toplanmasında, ergenlerin kişilik özelliklerini belirlemek üzere Hızlı Büyük Beşli Kişilik Testi (HBBKT), saldırganlık düzeylerini ölçmek üzere Saldırganlık Ölçeği (SÖ) kullanılmıştır. Araştırma yöntemi olarak değişkenler arasındaki ilişkiler, ilişkisel tarama modeli ile incelenmiştir. Araştırmadan elde edilen verilerin analizinde ise, korelasyon analizi ile çoklu regresyon analizi kullanılmıştır. Araştırmadan elde edilen bulgulara göre ergenlerin kişilik özellikleri ile saldırganlık ve saldırganlığın alt boyutları olan fiziksel, sözel, düşmanlık, öfke arasında anlamlı ilişkiler bulunmuştur. Uyumluluk, sorumluluk ve duygusal denge kişilik özellikleri saldırganlık ile negatif ilişkilidir. Dışadönüklük ise saldırganlık ile pozitif ilişkilidir. Son olarak yapılan regresyon analizinde ergenlerin uyumluluk, sorumluluk, duygusal denge ve dışadönüklük kişilik özelliklerinin saldırganlığı anlamlı düzeyde yordadığı görülmüştür. Kişilik özelliklerini incelemek saldırgan davranışların kaynağını tahmin etmede önemli bulunsa da gelecek araştırmalarda mizaç, karakter ve değer gibi değişkenlerin de incelenmesi önerilmektedir. Bireysel faktörlerin saldırgan davranışlara etkisini bilmek, saldırganlığı önlemede, ruh sağlığında sunulan önleyici hizmetlere ışık tutacaktır

Anahtar Kelimeler

• ergenler
• kişilik
• saldırganlık

THE PREDICTIVE EFFECT OF ADOLESCENTS' PERSONALITY TRAITS ON AGGRESSION LEVEL

Öz

In this study, it was aimed to examine the effect of adolescents' personality traits on predicting their aggressive behaviors. A total of 1235 students studying at different types of high schools participated in the study. To collect datas, The Quick Big Five Personality Test and the Aggression Scale was used. The relationship between the variables was examined the relational screening model. Analyzing datas, correlation analysis and multiple regression analysis were used. According to the findings, there were significant relationships between the personality traits of students and their aggression behavior and the physical, verbal, hostility and anger sub-dimensions of aggression. Agreeableness, conscientiousness, and emotional stability traits are negatively related to aggression. Extraversion is positively related to aggression. Finally, in the regression analysis, the personality traits of students' agreeableness, conscientiousness, emotional stability and extraversion significantly predicted aggression. Especially, personality traits are important predictive variable to understand aggressive behaviors but, it is suggested to examine variables such as temperament, character and value in future studies. Knowing the effects of individual factors on aggressive behavior will shed light on the preventive services offered in mental health in preventing aggression.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Adolescents
• personality
• aggression

Kaynakça

1. Akse, J., Hale, W. W., III, Engels, R. C., Raaijmakers, Q. A., & Meeus, W. H. (2004). Personality, perceived parental rejection and problem behavior in adolescence. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, 39, 980–988.
2. Akse, J., Hale, W. W., Engels, R. C., Raaijmakers, Q. A., & Meeus, W. H. (2007). Cooccurrence of depression and delinquency in personality types. European Journal of Personality, 21, 235–256.
3. Antoñanzas J. L. (2020). The relationship of personality, emotional ıntelligence, and aggressiveness in students: A study using the Big Five Personality Questionnaire for Children and Adults (BFQ-NA). European Journal of Investigation in Health, Psychology and Education, 11(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.3390/ejihpe11010001
4. Ayas, T., Horzum, B.M., & Koç, M. (2017). Lise öğrencilerinde sanal zorbalığın yaygınlığı ve önleme programının etkililiği. TÜBİTAK Proje No: 115K444. https://app.trdizin.gov.tr/proje/TVRjNU9EazU/lise-ogrencilerinde-sanal-zorbaligin-yayginligi-ve-onleme-programinin-etkililigi
5. Aydın, A., & Akgün, S.(2014). Ergenlikte reaktif proaktif saldırganlık, öfke ve narsizm ilişkisi. Türk Psikoloji Dergisi, 73, 44-59.
6. Branje, S.J.T., van Lieshout, C.F.M. & Gerris, J.R.M. (2006). Big five personality development in adolescence and adulthood. European Journal of Personality, 21, 45–62. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.596
7. Bödekker, I., & Stemmler, G. (2000). Who responds how and when to anger? The assessment of actual anger response styles and their relation to personality. Cognition and Emotion, 14, 737-762.
8. Burger, J. M. (2006). Kişilik. ( İ.D. Sarıoğlu,Çev.). İstanbul: Kaknus Yayınları.

9. Buss, A.H., & Perry, M. (1992). The aggression questionnaire. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, 452-459.
10. Büyüköztürk, Ş.(2011). Sosyal bilimler için veri analizi el kitabı (14. Baskı). Ankara: PEGEM
11. Caprara, G. V., & Pastorelli, C. (1993). Early emotional instability, prosocial behaviour, and aggression: Some methodological aspects. European Journal of Personality, 7, 19–36.
12. Caprara, G. V., Gerbino, M., Paciello, M., Di Giunta, L., & Pastorelli, C. (2010). Counteracting depression and delinquency in late adolescence: The role of regulatory emotional and interpersonal self-efficacy beliefs. European Psychologist, 15(1), 34–48. https://doi.org/10.1027/1016-9040/a000004
13. Carrasco Ortiz, M.A. & Barrio, M.V.D. (2006). Study on the relations between temperament, aggression, and anger in children. Aggressive Behavior, 32(3), 207-215. https://doi.org/10.1002/ab.20127
14. Carrasco Ortiz, M.A.,& Barrio, M.V.D.(2007). The Big Five model as a predictor of aggressive behaviour in the child and youth population. Journal of Psychopathology & Clinical Psychology, 12,23–32.
15. Cavalcanti, J.G. & Pimentel, C.E. (2016). Personality and aggression: A contribution of the General Aggression Model. Psychologıcal Assessments, 33 (3), 443-451. https://doi.org/10.1590/1982-02752016000300008
16. Çiçek, İ. & Aslan, A. E. (2020). Kişilik ve beş faktör kişilik özellikleri: Kuramsal bir çerçeve. Batman Üniversitesi Yaşam Bilimleri Dergisi, 10 (1) , 137-147.
17. Dane, A.V., & Marini, Z.A. (2014). Overt and relational forms of reactive aggression in adolescents: Relations with temperamental reactivity and self-regulation. Personality and Individual Differences, 60, 60-66.
18. Efilti, E. (2006). Ortaöğretim kurumlarında okuyan öğrencilerin saldırganlık, denetim odağı ve kişilik özelliklerinin karşılaştırmalı olarak incelenmesi (Yayımlanmamış doktora tezi). Selçuk Üniversitesi, Konya.
19. Favini, A., Gerbino, M., Eisenberg, N., Lunetti, C., & Thartori, E. (2018). Personality profiles and adolescents’ maladjustment: A longitudinal study. Personality and Individual Differences, 129, 119-125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2018.03.016
20. Fonagy, P., Target, M., Steele, M., Steele, H., Leigh, T., Levinson, A., & Kennedy, R. (1997). Morality, disruptive behavior, borderline personality disorder, crime and their relationship to security of attachment. In L. Atkinson & K. J. Zucker (Eds.), Attachment and psychopathology (pp. 223–274). Guilford Press.
21. Gleason, K.A., Jensen-Campbell, L.A., & Richardson, D.S. (2004). Agreeableness as a predictor of aggression in adolescence. Aggressive Behaviour, 30, 43-61.
22. Goldberg, L. R. (1990). An alternative "description of personality": The Big-Five factor structure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59(6), 1216–1229. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.59.6.1216
23. Gökkaya, F. & Tekinsav Sütcü, S. (2020). Akran zorbalığının ortaokul öğrencileri arasındaki yaygınlığının incelenmesi. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 35 (1), 40-54.
24. Gunzenhauser, C., Heikamp, T., Gerbino, M., Alessandri, G., von Suchodoletz, A., Di Giunta, L., Caprara, G. V., & Trommsdorff, G. (2013). Self-efficacy in regulating positive and negative emotions: A validation study in Germany. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 29(3), 197–204. https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759/a000151
25. Güneri Yöyen, E . (2017). Şiddet türleri ve kişilik özellikleri. Yaşam Becerileri Psikoloji Dergisi, 1(1), 35-50.
26. Hampson, S. E., Andrews, J. A., Barckley, M., & Peterson, M. (2007). Trait stability and continuity in childhood: Relating sociability and hostility to the five-factor model of personality. Journal of research in personality, 41(3), 507–523. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2006.06.003
27. Ivanovic, M.Z., Milosevijevic, S.M., & Ivanovic, U.M. (2015). Factorial structure of the relationship between aggresiveness and personality dimensions in junior karatekas. Facta Universitatis Physical Education and Sport, 13(3), 371-381.
28. Jensen-Campbell, L. A., & Graziano, W. G. (2001). Agreeableness as a moderator of interpersonal conflict. Journal of Personality, 69(2), 323–362. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6494.00148
29. Jensen-Campbell, L. A., Gleason, K. A., Adams, R., & Malcolm, K. T. (2003). Interpersonal Conflict, Agreeableness, and Personality Development. Journal of Personality, 71(6), 1059–1085. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6494.7106007
30. Jessor, R. (2016). The origins and development of problem behavior theory: The collected works of Richard Jessor. Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-40886-6
31. Jones, S.E., Miller, J.D., & Lynam, D. (2011). Personality, antisocial behavior and aggression: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Criminal Justice, 39(4), 329-337.
32. Karakaya, İ. (2012). Bilimsel araştırma yöntemleri. A. Tanrıöğen (Ed.) Bilimsel araştırma yöntemleri. (pp 57-83). Ankara: Anı Yayıncılık. ( 2. Baskı)
33. Kaya, Z., İkiz, F. E., & Asıcı, E. (2016). Fen lisesi öğrencilerinin problemli internet kullanımı ile psikolojik semptomları arasındaki ilişkinin incelenmesi. Journal of Human Sciences, 13(1), 451–465.
34. Kaya, Z. , İkiz, F. E. & Asıcı, E. (2019). Ergenlerin saldırganlık düzeyinin değer yönelimleri, cinsiyet ve anne babanın eğitim düzeyi açısından yordanması. Kastamonu Eğitim Dergisi, 27 (1) , 75-84. https://doi.org/10.24106/kefdergi.2306
35. Klimstra, T. A., Akse, J., Hale, W. W., Raaijmakers, Q. A., & Meeus, W. H. (2010). Longitudinal associations between personality traits and problem behavior symptoms in adolescence. Journal of Research in Personality, 44, 273–284.
36. Kodžopeljić, J., Smederevac, S., Mitrović, D., Dinić, B., & Čolović, P. (2014). School bullying in adolescence and personality traits: A person-centered approach. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 29(4), 736–757. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260513505216
37. Kokkinos, C. M., Antoniadou, N., & Markos, A. (2014). Cyber-bullying: An investigation of the psychological profile of university student participants. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 35, 204e214.
38. Kokkinos, C. M., & Voulgaridou, I. (2016). Links between relational aggression, parenting and personality among adolescents. European Journal of Developmental Psychology, 14(3), 249-264. https://doi.org/10.1080/17405629.2016.1194265
39. Kokkinos, C.M., Voulgaridou, I., & Markos, A. (2016b). Personality and relational aggression: Moral disengagement and friendship quality as mediators. Personality and Individual Differences, 95, 74-79.
40. Kokkinos, C. M., Karagianni, K., & Voulgaridou, I. (2017). Relational aggression, big five and hostile attribution bias in adolescent. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 52, 101-113.
41. Krueger, R.F., & Tackett, J.L. (2006). Personality and psychopathology, Guilford Press, New York.
42. Longobardi, C., Badenes-Ribera, L., Fabris, M. A., Martinez, A., & McMahon, S. D. (2019). Prevalence of sudent violence against teachers: A meta-analysis. Psychology of Violence, 9(6), 596–610. https://doi.org/10.1037/vio0000202
43. Morsümbül, Ü. (2014). Hızlı büyük beşli kişilik testi Türkçe versiyonu geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışması. Düşünen Adam The Journal of Psychiatry and Neurological Sciences, 27, 316-322.
44. Pakaslahti, L.(2000). Children’s and adolescents’ aggressive behavior in context: The development and application of aggressive problem-solving strategies. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 5(5), 467-490.
45. Parke, R. D.,&Asher, S. R. (1983). Social and personality development. Annual Review of Psychology, 34, 465–509.
46. Roberts, B. W., & Mroczek, D. (2008). Personality trait change in adulthood. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 17(1), 31–35. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8721.2008.00543.x
47. Robles-Haydar, C.A.; Martínez-González, M.B.; Flórez-Niño, Y.A.; Ibáñez-Navarro, L.M.; Amar-Amar, J.J. (2021). Personal and environmental predictors of aggression in adolescence. Brain Sciences, 11, 933. https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci11070933
48. Mitsopoulou, E., & Giovazolias, T. (2015). Personality traits, empathy and bullying behavior: A meta-analytic approach. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 21, 61–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2015.01.007
49. Nair, B. & Ercan, H. (2019). Ergenlerde saldırganlığın çeşitli değişkenler açısından incelenmesi. Journal of Theoretical Educational Science, 12 (3) , 1067-1094. https://doi.org/10.30831/akukeg.420615
50. Salmivalli, C., Ojanen, T., Haanpää, J., Peets, K. (2005). ‘I'm OK but you're not’ and other peer-relational schemas: Explaining individual differences in children's social goals. Developmental Psychology, 41, 363-375, https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.41.2.363
51. Seyran, F. & Gürhan, N. (2021). Eğitim kurumlarında öğrenciler arasında yaygınlaşan şiddet: Okul zorbalığı üzerine bibliyometrik bir araştırma. Ahi Evran Üniversitesi Kırşehir Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 22 (3) , 1690-1723.
52. Somer, O., Korkmaz, M., & Tatar, A. (2002). Beş Faktör Kişilik Envanteri’nin geliştirilmesi-1: Ölçek ve alt ölçeklerin oluşturulması. Türk Psikoloji Dergisi, 17(49), 21–33.
53. Steinberg, L., & Morris, A. S. (2001). Adolescent development. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 83–110.
54. Steinberg L. (2005). Cognitive and affective development in adolescence. Trends in cognitive sciences, 9(2), 69–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2004.12.005
55. Sümer, N. (2003). Personality and behavioral predictors of traffic accidents: testing a contextual mediated model. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 35, 949–964.
56. Tani, F., Greenman, P. S., Schneider, B. H., & Fregoso, M. (2003). Bullying and the Big Five: A study of childhood personality and participant roles in bullying incidents. School Psychology International, 24(2), 131–146. https://doi.org/10.1177/0143034303024002001
57. Totterdel, P., Holman, D. & Hukin A. (2008). Social networkers: measuring and examining individual differences in propensity to connect with others. Social Networks, 30, 283-296.
58. Ünlü, A., Evcin, U., Burakgazi-Yılmaz, H., & Dalkılıç, A. (2013). İstanbul devlet liselerinde suç ve şiddet yaygınlığı: Okul türlerinin karşılaştırılması. Anatolian Journal of Psychiatry, 14, 152-60.
59. Van den Akker, A. L., Deković, M., Asscher, J. J., Shiner, R. L., & Prinzie, P. (2013). Personality types in childhood: Relations to latent trajectory classes of problem behavior and overreactive parenting across the transition into adolescence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 104(4), 750–764. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0031184
60. Vanbrabant, K.; Kuppens, P.; Braeken, J.; Demaerschalk, E.; Boeren, A.; Tuerlinckx, F.; & Elsevier S.(2012). A relationship between verbal aggression and personal network size. Social Networks, 34(2), 164-170.
61. Vermulst, A.A., & Gerris, J.R.M. Q.B.F (2005). Quick big five personality test manual. Leeuwarden, The Netherlands: LDC Publications.
62. Volk, A. A., Schiralli, K., Xia, X., Zhao, J., & Dane, A.V. (2018). Adolescent bullying and personality: A cross-cultural approach. Personality and Individual Differences, 125, 126-132.
63. Xie, X., & Chen, W. (2015). The relationship between personality types and prosocial behavior and aggression in Chinese adolescents. Personality and Individual Differences, 95,56-61. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2016.02.002
64. Zahn-Waxler, C., Shirtcliff, E. A., & Marceau, K. (2008). Disorders of childhood and adolescence: gender and psychopathology. Annual review of clinical psychology, 4, 275–303. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.clinpsy.3.022806.091358