FEN DERSLERİNDE BİLİM TARİHİNİ KULLANMANIN BİR YOLU OLARAK YARATICI YAZIM ETKİNLİĞİ

Çiçek Bakanay

doi:10.24315/tred.853345

FEN DERSLERİNDE BİLİM TARİHİNİ KULLANMANIN BİR YOLU OLARAK YARATICI YAZIM ETKİNLİĞİ

Öz

Bilim tarihi, bilimin doğasını sınıf ortamına dahil etmede kullanılabilecek etkili araçlardan biridir. Bir diğer etkili eğitsel teknik ise bilgiden ziyade bireyin konuya ilişkin ön bilgilerini, duygu ve düşüncelerini yazıya dökerek yansıtmasına olanak tanıyan yaratıcı yazım tekniğidir. Bu çalışmada, bilim tarihi ile birleştirilerek geliştirilmiş yaratıcı yazım etkinliğinin öğretim süreci içerisindeki uygulanışı incelenmiştir. İlgili etkinlikte bilim insanı meslektaşından araştırmaları sonucunda ulaşmış olduğu sonuçları, bilimsel teori mi yoksa kanun olarak mı sunması gerektiği konusunda bir mektup ile yardım istemektedir. Sınıf öğretmenliğinden 25 öğretmen adayının kendilerine gönderilen mektuba cevap yazmaları ile başlayan yaratıcı yazım süreci sınıf içi tartışmalar ile devam etmiştir. İçerik analizi sonrasında, öğretmen adaylarının mektuplarına başlarken bilimsel teori ve kanuna dair tanımlarını doğru vermelerine karşın sunmuş oldukları gerekçelerinde teori-kanun arasındaki ilişkiye yönelik kavram yanılgılarını devam ettirdikleri tespit edilmiştir. Bir diğer önemli bulgu ise bilim tarihinden yararlanılarak geliştirilmiş olmasının öğretmen adaylarının bilim insanıyla kişisel ilişkiler kurmasında kolaylaştırıcı bir etmen olduğu dikkat çekmiştir

Anahtar Kelimeler

Kaynakça

Abd-El-Khalick, F., Lederman, N. G., Bell, R. L., & Schwartz, R. S. (2001). Views of Nature of Science Questionnaire (VNOS): Toward Valid and Meaningful Assessment of Learners' Conceptions of Nature of Science.
Abd-El-Khalick, F., & Lederman, N. G. (2000). The influence of history of science courses on students' views of nature of science. Journal of research in science teaching, 37(10), 1057-1095.
Akerson, V. L., Abd‐El‐Khalick, F., & Lederman, N. G. (2000). Influence of a reflective explicit activity‐based approach on elementary teachers' conceptions of nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching: The Official Journal of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, 37(4), 295-317.
Allchin, D. (2012). The Minnesota case study collection: New historical inquiry case studies for nature of science education. Science & Education, 21(9), 1263-1281.
Atasoy, S. (2013). Effect of Writing to Learn Strategy on Undergraduates Conceptual Understanding of Electrostatic. Asia Pasific Edu res, 22(4), 593-602.
Becker, B. J. (2000). MindWorks: Making scientific concepts come alive. Science & Education, 9(3), 269-278.
Boerner, J. (2014). Utilizing the History of Science to Enhance Student Understanding and Engagement: A Compilation of Earth Science Lesson Plans.
Bora, N. (2005). Turkiye genelinde ortaogretim fen bransi ogretmen ve ogrencilerinin bilimin dogasi uzerine goruslerinin arastirilmasi. Yayinlanmamis Doktora Tezi (unpublished dissertation), Gazi Universitesi, Egitim Bilimleri Enstitusu, Ankara.

Bruner, J. (1985). Child's talk: Learning to use language. Child Language Teaching and Therapy, 1(1), 111-114.
Clough, M. P. (2006). Learners’ responses to the demands of conceptual change: Considerations for effective nature of science instruction. Science & Education, 15(5), 463-494.
Conant, J. B. (1951). Science and common sense.
Duschl, R. A. (1990). Restructuring science education: The importance of theories and their development: Teachers College Press.
Galili, I., & Hazan, A. (2001). Experts' views on using history and philosophy of science in the practice of physics instruction. Science & Education, 10(4), 345-367.
Gunel, M., Hand, B., ve Gunduz, S. (2006). Comparing studnt understanding of quantum physics when embedding multimodal representation into two diffirent writing formats: Presentation format vs summary report format. Science Education, 90(6), 1092-1112.
Guney, B. G., & Seker, H. (2012). The Use of History of Science as a Cultural Tool to Promote Students' Empathy with the Culture of Science. Educational Sciences: Theory and Practice, 12(1), 533-539.
Hand, B., Gunel, M., & Ulu, C. (2009) Sequencing embedded multimodal representation in a writing to learn approach to the teaching electricity. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46 (3), 225-247.
Harland, T. (2014). Learning about case study methadology to research higher education, Higher Education Research & Development, 33 (6), 1113-1122.
Hein, T. L. (1999). Using writing to confront student misconceptions in physics. European Journal of Physics, 20(3), 137.
Henderson, J. ve Wellington, J. (1998). Lowering the language barrier in learning and teaching Science. School Science Review, 79 (288), 35-46.
HIPST. (2009). Theoretical framework. The Project History and Philosophy in Science Teaching, http://hipst.eled.auth.gr/ web adresinden 23 Eylül 2018 tarihinde elde edilmiştir.
Höttecke, D., Henke, A., & Riess, F. (2012). history Implementing and philosophy in science teaching: Strategies, methods, results and experiences from the European HIPST project. Science & Education, 21(9), 1233-1261.
Irez, S. (2006). Are we prepared?: An assessment of preservice science teacher educators' beliefs about nature of science. Science Education, 90(6), 1113-1143.
Irwin, A. R. (2000). Historical case studies: Teaching the nature of science in context. Science education, 84(1), 5-26.
Keys, C.W., Hand, B., Prain, V. ve Collins, S. (1999b) Using the science writing heuristic as a tool for learning from laboratory investigations in secondary science Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36 (10), 1065-1084.
Khishfe, R., & Abd‐El‐Khalick, F. (2002). Influence of explicit and reflective versus implicit inquiry‐oriented instruction on sixth graders' views of nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching: The Official Journal of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, 39(7), 551-578.
Klopfer, L. & Cooley, W. (1963). Effectiveness of the history of science cases for high schools in the development of student understanding of science and scientists. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 1, 35-47.
Kokkotas, P. & Piliouras, P. (2005). Bridging history of science and science education: “The MAP project”, in IHPST 2005: The papers.
Kokkotas, P., Bevilacqua, F., Valanides, N., Heering, P. & Seroglou, F. (2007). The STeT project: Teaching science using case studies from the history of science. Proceedings of the 9th International History, Philosophy and Science Teaching Conference, 24-28 June, Calgary, Canada.
Lederman, N. G. (2013). Nature of science: Past, present, and future. In Handbook of research on science education (pp. 845-894). Routledge.
Leite, L. (2002). History of science in science education: Development and validation of a checklist for analysing the historical content of science textbooks. Science & Education, 11(4), 333-359.
Lin, H. s., & Chen, C. C. (2002). Promoting preservice chemistry teachers' understanding about the nature of science through history. Journal of research in science teaching, 39(9), 773-792.
Lind, G. (1980). Models in physics: Some pedagogical reflections based on the history of science. European Journal of Science Education, 2(1), 15-23.
Matthews, M. R. (1994). Science teaching: The role of history and philosophy of science: Psychology Press.
Matthews, M. R. (2000). Time for science education: How teaching the history and philosophy of pendulum motion can contribute to science literacy (Vol. 8). Springer Science & Business Media.
McComas, W. F. (1998). The nature of science in science education rationales and strategies.
McComas, W. F. (2003). A textbook case of the nature of science: Laws and theories in the science of biology. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 1(2), 141-155.
Meeriam, S.B. (1998). Qualitative research and case study applications in education. California: Jossey-Bass.
Olson, J. K., Clough, M. P., Bruxvoort, C. N., & Vanderlinden, D. W. (2005, July). Improving students’ Nature of Science understanding through historical short stories in an introductory Geology course. In Eighth International History, Philosophy, Sociology & Science Teaching Conference, University of Leeds (pp. 15-18).
Oral, G. (2003). Yine yazı yazıyoruz. Ankara: Pegem A Yayıncılık.
Rudge, D. W., Geer, U. C., & Howe, E. M. (2007). But is it effective? Assessing the impact of a historically-based unit. Paper presented at the Ninth international history, philosophy & science teaching (IHPST) conference, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada, Session.
Rudge, D. W., & Howe, E. M. (2009). An explicit and reflective approach to the use of history to promote understanding of the nature of science. Science & education, 18(5), 561-580.
Rutherford, F. J., Holton, G. J. & Watson, F. G. (1981). Harvard Project Physics. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston
Sandoval, W. A., & Morrison, K. (2003). High school students' ideas about theories and theory change after a biological inquiry unit. Journal of Research in Science Teaching: The Official Journal of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, 40(4), 369-392.
Schwartz, R. S., Lederman, N. G., & Crawford, B. A. (2004). Developing views of nature of science in an authentic context: An explicit approach to bridging the gap between nature of science and scientific inquiry. Science education, 88(4), 610-645.
Seroglou, F., Koumaras, P., & Tselfes, V. (1998). History of science and instructional design: The case of electromagnetism. Science & Education, 7(3), 261-280.
Solomon, J., Duveen, J., Scot, L., & McCarthy, S. (1992). Teaching about the nature of science through history: Action research in the classroom. Journal of research in science teaching, 29(4), 409-421.
Stake, R. E. (1995). The art of case study research. Thousand Oaks: Sage Pbc.
Stamoulis, E., & Plakitsi, K. (2013). Activity Theory, History and Philosophy of Science, and ICT Technologies in Science Teaching Applications. In Activity Theory in Formal and Informal Science Education (pp. 111-157). SensePublishers, Rotterdam.
Stinner, A., McMillan, B. A., Metz, D., Jilek, J. M., & Klassen, S. (2003). The renewal of case studies in science education. Science & Education, 12(7), 617-643.
Tolvanen, S., Jansson, J., Vesterinen, V.-M., & Aksela, M. (2014). How to Use Historical Approach to Teach Nature of Science in Chemistry Education? Science & Education, 23(8), 1605-1636.
Van Driel, J. H., De Vos, W., & Verloop, N. (1998). Relating students' reasoning to the history of science: The case of chemical equilibrium. Research in Science Education, 28(2), 187-198.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1964). Thought and language. Annals of Dyslexia, 14(1), 97-98.
Vygotsky, L.S. (1967) Imagination and creativity in childhood. [Electronic version]. Journal of Russian and East European Psychology 42, English translation (2004) M.E. Sharpe, Inc., from the Russian text Voobrazhenie i tvorchestvo v detskom vozraste.
Wandersee, J. H. (1986). Can the history of science help science educators anticipate students' misconceptions? Journal of research in science teaching, 23(7), 581-597.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil

Türkçe

Konular

Eğitim Üzerine Çalışmalar

Bölüm

Araştırma Makalesi

Yazarlar

Çiçek Bakanay ^*
0000-0001-9491-2569
Türkiye

Yayımlanma Tarihi

27 Eylül 2021

Gönderilme Tarihi

4 Ocak 2021

Kabul Tarihi

19 Mayıs 2021

Yayımlandığı Sayı

Yıl 2021 Cilt: 11 Sayı: 3

DOI

https://doi.org/10.24315/tred.853345

IZ

https://izlik.org/JA33US82SW

Kaynak Göster

RIS / Bibtex

APA

Bakanay, Ç. (2021). FEN DERSLERİNDE BİLİM TARİHİNİ KULLANMANIN BİR YOLU OLARAK YARATICI YAZIM ETKİNLİĞİ. Trakya Eğitim Dergisi, 11(3), 1457-1470. https://doi.org/10.24315/tred.853345

AMA

1.Bakanay Ç. FEN DERSLERİNDE BİLİM TARİHİNİ KULLANMANIN BİR YOLU OLARAK YARATICI YAZIM ETKİNLİĞİ. TRED. 2021;11(3):1457-1470. doi:10.24315/tred.853345

Chicago

Bakanay, Çiçek. 2021. “FEN DERSLERİNDE BİLİM TARİHİNİ KULLANMANIN BİR YOLU OLARAK YARATICI YAZIM ETKİNLİĞİ”. Trakya Eğitim Dergisi 11 (3): 1457-70. https://doi.org/10.24315/tred.853345.

EndNote

Bakanay Ç (01 Eylül 2021) FEN DERSLERİNDE BİLİM TARİHİNİ KULLANMANIN BİR YOLU OLARAK YARATICI YAZIM ETKİNLİĞİ. Trakya Eğitim Dergisi 11 3 1457–1470.

IEEE

[1]Ç. Bakanay, “FEN DERSLERİNDE BİLİM TARİHİNİ KULLANMANIN BİR YOLU OLARAK YARATICI YAZIM ETKİNLİĞİ”, TRED, c. 11, sy 3, ss. 1457–1470, Eyl. 2021, doi: 10.24315/tred.853345.

ISNAD

Bakanay, Çiçek. “FEN DERSLERİNDE BİLİM TARİHİNİ KULLANMANIN BİR YOLU OLARAK YARATICI YAZIM ETKİNLİĞİ”. Trakya Eğitim Dergisi 11/3 (01 Eylül 2021): 1457-1470. https://doi.org/10.24315/tred.853345.

JAMA

1.Bakanay Ç. FEN DERSLERİNDE BİLİM TARİHİNİ KULLANMANIN BİR YOLU OLARAK YARATICI YAZIM ETKİNLİĞİ. TRED. 2021;11:1457–1470.

MLA

Bakanay, Çiçek. “FEN DERSLERİNDE BİLİM TARİHİNİ KULLANMANIN BİR YOLU OLARAK YARATICI YAZIM ETKİNLİĞİ”. Trakya Eğitim Dergisi, c. 11, sy 3, Eylül 2021, ss. 1457-70, doi:10.24315/tred.853345.

Vancouver

1.Çiçek Bakanay. FEN DERSLERİNDE BİLİM TARİHİNİ KULLANMANIN BİR YOLU OLARAK YARATICI YAZIM ETKİNLİĞİ. TRED. 01 Eylül 2021;11(3):1457-70. doi:10.24315/tred.853345