Araştırma Makalesi

Opinions of teachers on the 2018 secondary education Turkish Republic Revolution History and Kemalism course curriculum

Cilt: 11 Sayı: 1 24 Mayıs 2022
PDF İndir
EN TR

Opinions of teachers on the 2018 secondary education Turkish Republic Revolution History and Kemalism course curriculum

Öz

Revolution history research involves many elements—such as the teacher, student, course curriculum, and textbook—presenting the solutions in the context of the current situation. With the research question “What are the opinions and suggestions of teachers of the Secondary Education Turkish Republic Revolution History and Kemalism course about the new curriculum?”, this research examines the fulfillment of the 2018 Secondary Education Turkish Republic Revolution History and Kemalism Course Curriculum by the case study methodology. In this context, a questionnaire consisting of 18 open-ended questions covering the basic components of the curriculum, such as objectives, content, instructional methods, and evaluation was developed. The questionnaire was administered online in two academic semesters to 25 history teachers working in public and private secondary education institutions affiliated with the Ministry of National Education (MEB) in Çankırı who were teaching the Turkish Republic Revolution History and Kemalism course. In the current research, the following conclusions were drawn: the duration of weekly course hours limits the fulfillment of course goals and learning outcomes, depth of content presentation, and instructional methodologies used; teachers have primarily favorable opinions about the objectives, but they identify some factors that limit the achievement of the objectives; teachers draw attention to the borders of the course, newly added topics, and the chronology in the determination, organization, and dealing with the content; although it is stated that more than one teaching method can be used in the instructional process, generally direct teaching is used; the traditional and alternative approaches are preferred together by indicating variety in the evaluation; teachers explain mainly methodological phenomena in the strengths of the curriculum, however they make explanations that focusing on content component, in comparison of the curriculum with the previous curricula, and on the weakness of the curriculum.

Anahtar Kelimeler

History education, Turkish Republic Revolution History and Kemalism, opinions of teachers

Kaynakça

  1. Acun, F. (2012). Yakın dönem tarihinin ortaöğretimde öğretimi: Problem ve öneriler. Turkish History Education Journal, 1(1), 32-55.
  2. Akbaba, B. (2008), Atatürk İlkeleri ve İnkılâp Tarihi dersinin öğretiminde karşılaşılan sorunlar (Gazi Üniversitesi örneği). Akademik Bakış, 1(2), 177-197.
  3. Akbaba, B., Demirtaş, B., Birbudak, T. S., & Kılcan, B. (2014). Tarih öğretmeni adaylarının Atatürk İlkeleri ve İnkılâp Tarihi öğretimine yönelik görüşleri. Journal of World of Turks, 6(2), 207-226.
  4. Aktaş, Ö. (2020). Ortaöğretim tarih öğretim programlarına ilişkin öğretmen görüşleri. Atatürk Üniversitesi Edebiyat Fakültesi Dergisi, 64, 69-80.
  5. Aktekin, S., & Ceylan, D. (2012). 9. sınıf yeni tarih dersi öğretim programı ile ilgili öğretmen görüşleri. Millî Eğitim, 194, 253-268.
  6. Bal, M. S. (2011). Türkiyede tarih öğretiminin sorunları ve çözüm yolları konusunda öğretmen adayı ve öğretmen görüşlerinin karşılaştırılması. Mustafa Kemal Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 8(15), 371 – 387.
  7. Baykara, T. (1981). Türk devrim tarihi. Ankara: Hacettepe Üniversitesi.
  8. Büyüköztürk, Ş., Kılıç Çakmak, E., Akgün, Ö. E., Karadeniz, Ş., & Demirel, F. (2014). Bilimsel araştırma yöntemleri. Ankara: Pegem Akademi.
  9. Çençen, N., & Akça Berk, N. (2014). Ortaöğretim T. C. İnkılâp Tarihi ve Atatürkçülük dersinde “şiir kullanımına” ilişkin öğretmen görüşleri. Turkish History Education Journal, 3(1), 1-23.
  10. Demirel, Ö. (2012). Eğitimde program geliştirme. Ankara: Pegem Akademi.

Kaynak Göster

APA
Körhasan, A. (2022). Opinions of teachers on the 2018 secondary education Turkish Republic Revolution History and Kemalism course curriculum. Turkish History Education Journal, 11(1), 21-43. https://doi.org/10.17497/tuhed.1062807
AMA
1.Körhasan A. Opinions of teachers on the 2018 secondary education Turkish Republic Revolution History and Kemalism course curriculum. TUHED. 2022;11(1):21-43. doi:10.17497/tuhed.1062807
Chicago
Körhasan, Abdullah. 2022. “Opinions of teachers on the 2018 secondary education Turkish Republic Revolution History and Kemalism course curriculum”. Turkish History Education Journal 11 (1): 21-43. https://doi.org/10.17497/tuhed.1062807.
EndNote
Körhasan A (01 Mayıs 2022) Opinions of teachers on the 2018 secondary education Turkish Republic Revolution History and Kemalism course curriculum. Turkish History Education Journal 11 1 21–43.
IEEE
[1]A. Körhasan, “Opinions of teachers on the 2018 secondary education Turkish Republic Revolution History and Kemalism course curriculum”, TUHED, c. 11, sy 1, ss. 21–43, May. 2022, doi: 10.17497/tuhed.1062807.
ISNAD
Körhasan, Abdullah. “Opinions of teachers on the 2018 secondary education Turkish Republic Revolution History and Kemalism course curriculum”. Turkish History Education Journal 11/1 (01 Mayıs 2022): 21-43. https://doi.org/10.17497/tuhed.1062807.
JAMA
1.Körhasan A. Opinions of teachers on the 2018 secondary education Turkish Republic Revolution History and Kemalism course curriculum. TUHED. 2022;11:21–43.
MLA
Körhasan, Abdullah. “Opinions of teachers on the 2018 secondary education Turkish Republic Revolution History and Kemalism course curriculum”. Turkish History Education Journal, c. 11, sy 1, Mayıs 2022, ss. 21-43, doi:10.17497/tuhed.1062807.
Vancouver
1.Abdullah Körhasan. Opinions of teachers on the 2018 secondary education Turkish Republic Revolution History and Kemalism course curriculum. TUHED. 01 Mayıs 2022;11(1):21-43. doi:10.17497/tuhed.1062807