In the Context of the Digital Public Sphere The Great Hack: A Big Data-Focused Analysis

Öz

Big data components are shaping the digital public sphere. The areas of use for big data components in the digital public sphere are expanding, and in this context, new digital possibilities affecting social life are increasing. This study focuses on the documentary film The Great Hack, directed by J. Noujaim and K. Amer, which was released on the Netflix platform in 2019. The aim of the study is to identify the elements of the concept of digital public space and big data components in The Great Hack documentary film that shape the film and the narrative. It also aims to identify the embedded meanings underlying these elements. The main research question is: “What are the open, axial, and selective coding transfers in the documentary film using the grounded theory approach?” The data collection technique for the research is document analysis. The method of analysis is the grounded theory design, which can be used in qualitative research processes. Open, axial, and selective coding of the interaction of digital public space and big data is performed using the grounded theory pattern, adhering to the documentary film’s style and narrative. In addition, themes, categories, and codes between the concepts are identified, and the connections and interactions between them are explained. As a result of the analyses, it was determined that digital media and digital traces were emphasized in the documentary film’s style and narrative. Additionally, in the interaction of digital public space and big data components in the documentary film, it was found that digitalization, people’s personal profiles, privacy, and data collection and processing processes are highlighted.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Big Data
• Digital Public Sphere
• Grounded Theory
• The Great Hack
• Documentary Film

Dijital Kamusal Alan Bağlamında The Great Hack: Büyük Veri Odaklı Bir Analiz

Öz

Büyük veri bileşenleri dijital kamusal alanı biçimlendirmektedir. Dijital kamusal alanda büyük veri bileşenlerinin kullanım alanları genişlemekte ve bu kapsamda sosyal hayatı etkiyen yeni dijital olanaklar artmaktadır. Bu çalışmada, 2019 yılında Netflix platformunda yayınlanan, yönetmenliğini J. Noujaim ve K. Amer’in üstlendiği The Great Hack belgesel filmi ele alınmaktadır. Çalışmanın amacı, The Great Hack belgesel filminde dijital kamusal alan kavramının ve büyük veri bileşenlerinin filmi biçimlendirme ve anlatıyı şekillendirme unsurlarını belirlemektir. Ayrıca bu unsurların altında yatan gömülü anlamları tespit etmektir. Araştırmada ana sorunsal olarak; “belgesel filmde, gömülü teori yaklaşımında yer alan açık, eksen ve seçici kodlama aktarımları nelerdir” sorusuna cevap aranmaktadır. Araştırmanın veri toplama tekniği doküman incelemesidir. Analiz yöntemi ise nitel araştırma yöntem süreçlerinde yararlanılabilen gömülü teori (grounded theory) desenidir. Belgesel film biçemi ve anlatısına bağlı kalarak gömülü teori deseniyle dijital kamusal alan ve büyük veri etkileşimine ait açık, eksen ve seçici kodlama yapılmaktadır. Ek olarak kavramlar arasındaki tema, kategori ve kodlar tespit edilmekte, aralarındaki bağlantılar ve etkileşim açıklanmaktadır. Yapılan analizler sonucunda, belgesel film biçem ve anlatısında dijital medya ve dijital izler üzerinde durulduğu belirlenmiştir. Ek olarak belgesel filmde dijital kamusal alan ve büyük veri bileşenleri etkileşiminde; dijitalleşmenin, insanların kişisel profillernin, mahremiyetin, veri toplama ve işleme süreçlerinin ön plana çıktığı saptanmıştır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Büyük Veri
• Dijital Kamusal Alan
• Gömülü Teori
• The Great Hack
• Belgesel Sinema

Kaynakça

1. Abdulwahab, H. M., Ajitha, S. & Saif, M. A. (2022). Feature selection techniques in the context of big data: Taxonomy and analysis. Applied Intelligence, 52, 13568-13613. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10489.021.03118-3
2. Afful-Dadzie, E., Afful-Dadzie, A. & Egala, S. B. (2023). Social media in health communication: A literature review of information quality. Health Information Management Journal, 52(1), 3-17. https://doi. org/10.1177/183.335.832199268
3. Arda, Ö. (2015). Belgesel filmde yeni yaklaşımların ıdfa doclab 2010-2015 belgesel film örneklemi üzerinden yapısal ve kullanım özelliklerine göre içerik analizi. İstanbul Üniversitesi İleitşim Fakültesi Dergisi, (48), 1-23. https://doi.org/10.17064/iüifhd.35647
4. Baranowski, M. (2022). Radicalising cultures of uneven data-driven political communication. Knowledge Cultures, 10(2), 145-155. https://doi.org/10.22381/kc10220227
5. Barassi, V. (2017). Digital citizens? Data traces and family life. Journal of the Academy of Social Sciences, 12(1-2), 84-95. https://doi.org/10.1080/21582.041.2017.1338353
6. Baudrillard, J. (2022). Simülakrlar ve simülasyonlar. Doğu Batı Yayınları.
7. Bennett, W. L. & Pfetsch, B. (2018). Rethinking political communication in a time of disrupted public spheres. Journal of Communication, 68(2), 243-253. https://doi.org/10.1093/joc/jqx017
8. Berti, C. & Loner, E. (2023). Character assassination as a right-wing populist communication tactic on social media: The case of Matteo Salvini in Italy. New Media & Society, 25(11), 2939-2960. https://doi. org/10.1177/146.144.48211039222

9. Bruns, A. (2018). Digital public spheres in Australia. Routledge.
10. Carminati, B., Ferrari, E., Heatherly, R., Kantarcioglu, M. & Thuraisingham, B. (2011). Semantic web-based social network access control. Computers & Security, 30(2-3), 108-115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. cose.2010.08.003
11. Castells, M. (2008). The new public sphere: Global civil society, communication networks and global governance. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 616(1), 78-93. https:// doi.org/10.1177/000.271.6207311877
12. Chen, M., Mao, S., Zhang, Y. & Leung, V. C. (2014). Big data – Related technologies, challenges and future prospects. Springer.
13. Corbin, J. & Strauss, A. (2014). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. SAGE Publications.
14. Creswell, J. W. & Creswell, J. D. (2021). Araştırma tasarımı – Nitel, nicel ve karma yöntem yaklaşımları. Nobel Akademik Yayıncılık.
15. Dahlgren, P. (2001). Computer-mediated communication and the public sphere: A critical analysis. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 22(2), 147-162. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2001. tb00137.x
16. Dahlgren, P. (2018). Media, knowledge and trust: The deepening epistemic crisis of democracy. Journal of the European Institute for Communication and Culture, 25(1-2), 20-27. https://doi.org/10.1080/13183.222. 2018.1418819
17. Eitzen, D. (1995). When is a documentary?: Documentary as a mode of reception. Cinema Journal, 35(1), 81- 102. https://doi.org/10.2307/1225809
18. Eyüpoğlu, C., Aydın, M. A., Sertbaş, A., Zaim, A. H. & Öneş, O. (2017). Büyük veride kişi mahremiyetinin korunması. Bilişim Teknolojileri Dergisi, 10(2), 177-184. https://doi.org/10.17671/gazibtd.309301
19. Flick, U. (2023). An introduction to qualitative research. SAGE Publications.
20. Frank, J. (2013). The claims of documentary: Expanding the educational significance of documentary film. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 45(10), 1018-1027. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-5812.2012.00849.x
21. Friedland, L. A., Hove, T. & Rojas, H. (2006). The networked public sphere. Journal of the European Institute for Communication and Culture, 13(4), 5-26. https://doi.org/10.1080/13183.222.2006.11008922
22. Fuchs, C. (2021). The digital commons and the digital public sphere: How to advance digital democracy today. Westminster Papers in Communication and Culture, 16(1), 9-26. https://doi.org/10.16997/wpcc.917
23. Gandomi, A. & Haider, M. (2015). Beyond the hype: Big data concepts, methods, and analytics. International Journal of Information Management, 35(2), 137-144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2014.10.007
24. Gimmler, A. (2001). Deliberative democracy, the public sphere and the internet. Philosophy & Social Criticism, 27(4), 21-39. https://doi.org/10.1177/019.145.370102700402
25. Glaser, B. & Strauss, A. (2017). Discovery of grounded theory strategies for qualitative research. Routledge.
26. Güçlü, İ. (2021). Sosyal bilimlerde nitel araştırma yöntemleri (Teknik-yaklaşım-uygulama). Nika Yayınevi.
27. Güler, A., Halıcıoğlu, M. B., & Taşğın, S. (2015). Sosyal bilimlerde nitel araştırma. Seçkin Yayıncılık.
28. Habermas, J. (2015). Kamusallığın yapısal dönüşümü. İletişim Yayınları.
29. Hancock, B., Ockleford, E. & Windridge, K. (2007). An introduction to qualitative research. The NIHR RDS.
30. Hatuka, T. (2023). Public space and public rituals: Engagement and protest in the digital age. Urban Studies, 60(2), 379-392. https://doi.org/10.1177/004.209.80221089770
31. Horng, J.-S., Liu, C.-H., Chou, S.-F., Yu, T.-Y. & Ng, Y.-L. (2023). Modelling competitive advantage using the concepts of big data and social media to develop a sustainability strategy. Tourism Review, 78(3), 712- 725. https://doi.org/10.1108/TR-01-2022-0012
32. Jaiswal, M. (2018). Big data concept and imposts in business. International Journal of Advanced and Innovative Research (IJAIR), 7(4), 1-12. https://doi.org/ HYPERLINK “http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3772405” \t “_blank” 10.2139/ssrn.3772405
33. Li, M. (2022). Green governance and corporate social responsibility: The role of big data analytics. Sustainable Development, 31(2), 773-783. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.2418
34. McLuhan, M. (1992). The global village: Transformations in world life and media in the 21st century. Oxford University Press.
35. Mertens, D. M. (2019). Research and evaluation in education and pyschology: Integrating diversity with quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methods. SAGE Publications.
36. Minh-Ha, T. T. (1990). Documentary is/not a name. The MIT Press, 52, 76-98. https://doi.org/10.2307/778886
37. Molnár, V. (2014). Reframing public space through digital mobilization: Flash mobs and contemporary urban youth culture. Space and Culture, 17(1), 43-58. https://doi.org/10.1177/120.633.1212452368
38. Mortaheb, R. & Jankowski, P. (2023). Smart city re-imagined: City planning and GeoAI in the age of big data. Journal of Urban Management, 12(1), 4-15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jum.2022.08.001
39. Nichols, B. (2001). Introduction to documentary. Indiana University Press.
40. Papacharissi, Z. (2002). The virtual sphere: The internet as a public sphere. New Media & Society, 4(1), 9-27. https://doi.org/10.1177/146.144.40222226244
41. Persily, N. (2017). Can democracy survive the internet?. Journal of Democracy, 28(2), 63-76. https://doi. org/10.1353/jod.2017.0025
42. Peruzzi, A., Zollo, F., Quattrociocchi, W. & Scala, A. (2018). How news may affect markets’ complex structure: The case of Cambridge Analytica. Entropy, 20(10), 765-777. https://doi.org/10.3390/e20100765
43. Ross, B., Pilz, L., Cabrera, B., Brachten, F., Neubaum, G. & Stieglitz, S. (2019). Are social bots a real threat? An agent-based model of the spiral of silence to analyse the impact of manipulative actors in social networks. European Journal of Information Systems, 28(4), 394-412. https://doi. org/10.1080/0960085X.2018.156.0920
44. Rossini, P. (2023). Farewell to big data? Studying misinformation in mobile messaging applications. Political Communication, 40(3), 361-366. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584.609.2023.2193563
45. Sakariassen, H. & Meijer, I. C. (2021). Why so quiet? Exploring inhibition in digital public spaces. European Journal of Communication, 36(5), 494-510. https://doi.org/10.1177/026.732.31211017346
46. Saunders, M. N., Lewis, P. & Thornhill, A. (2020). Research methods for business students. Pearson.
47. Schlesinger, P. (2020). After the post-public sphere. Media, Culture & Society, 42(7-8), 1545-1563. https://doi. org/10.1177/016.344.3720948003
48. Seeliger, M. & Sevignani, S. (2022). A new structural transformation of the public sphere? An introduction. Theory, Culture & Society, 39(4), 3-16. https://doi.org/10.1177/026.327.64221109439
49. Shah, D. V., Cappella, J. N. & Neuman, W. R. (2015). Big data, digital media, and computational social science: Possibilities and perils. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 659(1), 6-13. https://doi.org/10.1177/000.271.6215572084
50. Sharma, S. & Gupta, V. (2022). Role of twitter user profile features in retweet prediction for big data streams. Multimedia Tools and Applications, 81, 27309-27338. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042.022.12815-1
51. Sığrı, Ü. (2021). Nitel araştırma yöntemleri. BETA Basım Yayım Dağıtım.
52. Stollery, M. (2017). John Grierson’s ‘first principles’ as origin and beginning: The emergence of the documentary tradition in the field of nonfiction film. Screen, 58(3), 309-331. https://doi.org/10.1093/screen/hjx027
53. Trenz, H.-J. (2009). Digital media and the return of the representative public sphere. Journal of the European Institute for Communication and Culture, 16(1), 33-46. https://doi.org/10.1080/13183.222.2009.110089 96
54. Valls, F. & Roca, J. (2022). Visualizing digital traces for sustainable urban management: Mapping tourism activity on the virtual public space. Sustainability, 13(6), 31-59. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13063159
55. Venturini, T. & Rogers, R. (2019). “API-based research” or how can digital sociology and journalism studies learn from the Facebook and Cambridge Analytica data breach. Digital Journalism, 7(4), 532-540. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670.811.2019.1591927
56. Volkmer, I. (2003). The global network society and global public sphere. Development: Thematic Section, 46(1), 9-16. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.development.1110415
57. Warmington, P., Gorp, A. V. & Grosvenor, I. (2011). Education in motion: Uses of documentary film in educational research. Paedagogica Historica, 47(4), 457-472. https://doi.org/10.1080/00309.230.2011.5 88239
58. Wu, X., Zhu, X., Wu, G.-Q. & Ding, W. (2013). Data mining with big data. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 26(1), 97-107. https://doi.org/10.1109/TKDE.2013.109
59. Yanık, A. & Batu, M. (2019). Yeni medyada aktivizm hareketleri üzerine zengin medya kısır aktivizm tartışmaları. Connectist: Istanbul University Journal of Communication Sciences, (56), 179-208. https:// doi.org/10.26650/CONNECTIST2019-0011
60. Yao, S., Fang, J. & He, H. (2020). Can time–space compression promote urban economic growth? Evidence from China’s high-speed rail projects. China & World Economy, 28(5), 90-117. https://doi.org/10.1111/ cwe.12339
61. Yıldırım, A. & Şimşek, H. (2021). Sosyal bilimlerde nitel araştırma yöntemleri. Seçkin Yayıncılık.