MESLEKLEŞMENİN ÖNÜNDEKİ ENGELLER: TÜRKİYE’DEKİ ÇEVİRMENLERDE YOKSULLUK KÜLTÜ İZLERİ

Öz

Bu çalışma, içselleştirilmiş yoksulluk kültü eğilimlerinin Türkiye’deki çevirmenlerin meslekleşme sürecini nasıl etkilediğini incelemektedir. Çalışmada Oscar Lewis’in yoksulluk kültürü kuramından Neil Inglis tarafından uyarlanan yoksulluk kültü ve Pierre Bourdieu’nün alan ve habitus kavramları temel alınmıştır. Türkiye’deki 237 çevirmenden 2022-2023 yılları arasında toplanan açık uçlu anket verileri Nitel İçerik Analizi (QCA) yöntemiyle analiz edilmiştir. Bulgular, katılımcılar arasında meslektaşların başarılarına karşı hoşnutsuzluk, mesleki yalnızlaşma, kurumlara yönelik alaycı tutum ve mesleki birlikteliğe karşı direnç gibi yoksulluk kültü eğilimlerinin yaygın olduğunu göstermektedir. Birçok katılımcı yasal düzenleme, sendikalaşma ve toplumsal tanınma vurgusu yapsa da bu taleplerin genellikle edilgen bir dille ifade edildiği, kişisel sorumluluk üstlenmekten kaçınıldığı gözlemlenmiştir. Sonuçlar, içselleştirilmiş ekonomik marjinalleşmenin profesyonel ağlarla etkileşimi azalttığını ve ortak mücadeleyi engellediğini ortaya koymaktadır. Meslekleşmenin etkili biçimde desteklenebilmesi için, dayanışma, güven ve ortak mesleki kimlik duygusunu geliştiren stratejiler aracılığıyla bu yerleşik tutumlarla doğrudan mücadele edilmelidir. Bunun için çeviri dernekleri, eğitim kurumları ve ilgili politika çerçevelerinin hedefe yönelik girişimlerde bulunması gereklidir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Çevirmen habitusu
• Dil hizmetleri sektörü
• Nitel içerik analizi
• Meslekleşme
• Yoksulluk kültü

BARRIERS TO PROFESSIONALIZATION: POVERTY CULT TRAITS AMONG TRANSLATORS IN TÜRKIYE

Öz

This study investigates how internalized traits associated with the concept of poverty cult influence the professionalization of translators in Türkiye. Drawing on Neil Inglis’s poverty cult, an adaptation of Oscar Lewis’s culture of poverty theory, and Pierre Bourdieu’s concepts of field and habitus, the research examines the impact of structural challenges on the attitudes and behaviors of translators. Data were collected through open-ended survey responses from 237 translators based in Türkiye between January 2022 and January 2023, and the analysis was conducted using Qualitative Content Analysis (QCA). The findings reveal several prevalent characteristics linked to the poverty cult, including resentment of colleagues’ success, isolationism, cynicism toward institutions, and resistance to professional unity. Although many participants advocate for enhanced regulation, unionization, and greater public recognition, these comments were often articulated in passive language, reflecting a reluctance to take proactive measures. The results suggest that internalized economic marginalization obstructs engagement with professional networks and collective advocacy. To effectively promote professionalization, strategies must directly confront these ingrained dispositions by fostering solidarity, trust, and a shared professional identity. Achieving this requires targeted initiatives from translator associations, educational institutions, and supportive policy frameworks.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Language services sector
• Poverty cult
• Professionalization
• Qualitative Content Analysis
• Translator habitus.

Kaynakça

1. Al-Tarawneh, A., Al-Badawi, M., & Hatab, W. A. (2024). Professionalizing legal translator training: Prospects and opportunities. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 14(2), 541-549. https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.1402.27
2. Block, D., Gray, J., & Holborow, M. (2012). Neoliberalism and applied linguistics. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203128121
3. Bourdieu, P. (1998). Practical reason: On the theory of action. Stanford University Press.
4. Bourdieu, P., & Wacquant, L. (2003). Düşünümsel bir antropoloji için cevaplar (N. Ökten, Trans.). İletişim Yayınları.
5. Clay, A. (1998). Choose your cult: Poverty or pride in performance. NOTIS News, 11(4), 1-7. https://www.notisnet.org/resources/Documents/NOTIS%20News/1998/1998%20Winter.pdf
6. Creswell, J. W. (2013). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.
7. Eruz, S. (2012). Çeviri Derneği ve Türkiye’de çevirmenlik mesleğinin statüye kavuş(a)ma(ma)sı üzerine on üç yıllık gel gitli bir öykü. In Proceedings of the Ministry for EU Affairs Translation Platform (pp. 17–23). http://www.ab.gov.tr/files/ceb/Ceviri_Platformu_Resimleri/platform_bildirileri.pdf
8. Figart, D. M. (2021). Contingent work and the gig economy. In The Routledge handbook of feminist economics (pp. 189-197). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429020612

9. Fırat, G. (2021). Uberization of translation: Impacts on working conditions. The Journal of Internationalization and Localization, 8(1), 48–75. https://doi.org/10.1075/jial.20006.fir
10. Fırat, G., Gough, J., & Moorkens, J. (2024). Translators in the platform economy: A decent work perspective. Perspectives, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/0907676X.2024.2323213
11. Gouanvic, J. M. (2005). A Bourdieusian theory of translation, or the coincidence of practical instances: field, ‘habitus’, capital, and ‘illusio.’ The Translator, 11(2), 147–166. https://doi.org/10.1080/13556509.2005.10799196
12. Grbić, N., & Kujamäki, P. (2018). Professional vs non-professional? In H. V. Dam, M. N. Brøgger, & K. K. Zethsen, Moving boundaries in translation studies (pp. 113–131). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315121871-8
13. Harvey, D. (2005). A brief history of neoliberalism. Oxford University Press.
14. Hendzel, K. (2018, November 27). The seven virtues of the new translation era. The ATA Chronicle. https://www.atanet.org/specializations/the-seven-virtues-of-the-new-translation-era/
15. Inghilleri, M. (2003). Habitus, field and discourse: Interpreting as a socially situated activity. Target. International Journal of Translation Studies, 15(2), 243-268. https://doi.org/10.1075/target.15.2.03ing
16. Inglis, N. (2016, May 18). Revisiting the “poverty cult” 20 years on. The ATA Chronicle. https://www.atanet.org/resources/revisiting-the-poverty-cult-20-years-on/
17. Jan Chan, A. L., & Ming Liu, C. F. (2013). The translator status, the translation market and developing economies: A preliminary study of ASEAN countries. Southern African Linguistics and Applied Language Studies, 31(4), 435–450. https://doi.org/10.2989/16073614.2013.864441
18. Karadoğan, E. (2025). Living conditions of workers and retirees in Türkiye in the context of the rising cost of living. SEER Journal for Labour and Social Affairs in Eastern Europe, 28(2), 241–260. https://doi.org/10.5771/1435-2869-2024-2-241
19. Koskinen, K., & Dam, H. V. (2016). Academic boundary work and the translation profession: Insiders, outsiders and (assumed) boundaries. The Journal of Specialised Translation, 25, 254–267. https://doi.org/10.26034/cm.jostrans.2016.309
20. Kuckartz, U., & Rädiker, S. (2023). Qualitative content analysis: Methods, practice and software (Second ed.). SAGE Publications.
21. Kuznik, A., & Verd, J. M. (2017). Investigating real work situations in translation agencies. Work content and its components. HERMES - Journal of Language and Communication in Business, 44, 25–43. https://doi.org/10.7146/hjlcb.v23i44.97263
22. Lambert, J., & Walker, C. (2022). Because we’re worth it: Disentangling freelance translation, status, and rate-setting in the United Kingdom. Translation Spaces, 11(2), 277–302. https://doi.org/10.1075/ts.21030.lam
23. Leridi, M. (2014, September 15). Chris Durban and the chamber of secrets [Interview]. PEEMPIP Blog. https://blog.peempip.gr/chris-durban-and-the-chamber-of-secrets/
24. Lewis, O. (1966). La Vida: A Puerto Rican family in the culture of poverty—San Juan and New York. Random House.
25. Lewis, O. (1974). The culture of poverty. In N. B. Levine & M. Hochbaum (Eds.), Poor Jews: An American awakening (pp. 16–28). Transaction Publishers.
26. Liu, F. M. C. (2024). Scrutinizing job satisfaction during COVID-19 through Facebook: Voices of Chinese translators. Translation Spaces. 13(1), 102-125. https://doi.org/10.1075/ts.23017.liu
27. Lune, H., and Berg, B. L. (2017). Qualitative research methods for the social sciences (Ninth edition). Pearson.
28. Mahadin, D., & Olimat, S. N. (2022). In their own words: How has Covid-19 affected Jordanian translators’ wellbeing? The Translator, 28(4), 489–505. https://doi.org/10.1080/13556509.2022.2159284
29. Menger, P. M. (2017). Contingent high-skilled work and flexible labor markets. Creative workers and independent contractors cycling between employment and unemployment. Swiss Journal of Sociology, 43(2), 253-284. https://doi.org/10.1515/sjs-2017-0015
30. Moorkens, J. (2017). Under pressure: Translation in times of austerity. Perspectives, 25(3), 464–477. https://doi.org/10.1080/0907676x.2017.1285331
31. Moorkens, J. (2020). Comparative satisfaction among freelance and directly-employed Irish-language translators. Translation and Interpreting: The International Journal of Translation and Interpreting Research, 12(1), 55–73. https://doi.org/10.12807/ti.112201.2020.a04
32. O’Connor, A. (2001). Poverty knowledge: Social science, social policy, and the poor in twentieth-century US history. Princeton University Press.
33. Obdržálková, V. (2024). Interaction and cooperation between professional associations and academia in the Czech Republic: The case of the Union of Interpreters and Translators. Mutatis Mutandis. Revista Latinoamericana de Traducción, 17(1), 71-88. https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.mut.v17n1a04
34. Parlak, B. (2012). Akademik çeviri öğretimi ve çeviride meslekleşme sorunları. The Proceedings of the Ministry for EU Affairs Translation Platform. http://www.ab.gov.tr/files/ceb/Ceviri_Platformu_Resimleri/platform_bildirileri.pdf
35. Pym, A., Grin, F., Sfreddo, C., & Chan, A. L. J. (2012). The Status of the Translation Profession in the European Union. Publication Offices of the European Union. http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/translation/publications/studies/translation_profession_en.pdf
36. Pym, A., Orrego-Carmona, D., & Torres-Simón, E. (2016). Status and technology in the professionalisation of translators. Market disorder and the return of hierarchy. Journal of Specialised Translation, 25, 33–53. https://doi.org/10.26034/cm.jostrans.2016.298
37. Şahin, M., & Kansu-Yetkiner, N. (2020). From translation market to translation curriculum: Psychosocial and physical ergonomics in Turkey. The Interpreter and Translator Trainer, 14(4), 440–460. https://doi.org/10.1080/1750399X.2020.1843123
38. Schreier, M. (2012). Qualitative content analysis in practice. SAGE.
39. Sela-Sheffy, R. (2005). How to be a (recognized) translator: Rethinking habitus, norms, and the field of translation. Target. International Journal of Translation Studies, 17(1), 1-26. https://doi.org/10.1075/target.17.1.02sel
40. Sela-Sheffy, R. (2015). Profession, identity, and status. In C. V. Angelelli and B. J. Baer (Eds.), Researching translation and interpreting (pp. 149–163). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315707280-22
41. Seymen, G. D., & Selcen Aslan, A. (2019). Türkiye’de çevirinin toplumsal görünürlüğü ve gelişiminde çeviri derneklerinin rolü. RumeliDE Dil ve Edebiyat Araştırmaları Dergisi, 15, 377–390. https://doi.org/10.29000/rumelide.580650
42. Simeoni, D. (1998). The pivotal status of the translator’s habitus. Target. International Journal of Translation Studies, 10(1), 1-39. https://doi.org/10.1075/target.10.1.02sim
43. Small, M. L., Harding, D. J., & Lamont, M. (2010). Reconsidering culture and poverty. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 629(1), 6–27. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716209357405
44. Tseng, J. (1992). Interpreting as an emerging profession in Taiwan (Unpublished master’s thesis). Fu Jen Catholic University, Taiwan.
45. Tyulenev, S. (2015). Towards theorising translation as an occupation. Asia Pacific Translation and Intercultural Studies, 2(1), 15–29. https://doi.org/10.1080/23306343.2015.1013206
46. Uysal, N. M. (2021). An in-depth analysis of the professionalization process of the translation profession in Turkey from the perspective of the sociology of professions. RumeliDE Dil ve Edebiyat Araştırmaları Dergisi, 23, 841–860. https://doi.org/10.29000/rumelide.949710
47. Valentine, C. A. (1968). Culture and poverty: Critique and counter-proposals. Current Anthropology, 10(2/3), 181-201. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2740476
48. Wolf, M. (2011). Mapping the field: Sociological perspectives on translation. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 2011 (207), 1-28. https://doi.org/10.1515/ijsl.2011.001
49. Yılmaz-Gümüş, V. (2018). Solidity and professionalization of translation: Turkey as a case in point. HERMES - Journal of Language and Communication in Business, 58, 43–63. https://doi.org/10.7146/hjlcb.v0i58.111661