An Investigation into Chemical Literacy of High School Students

Yıl 2025, Cilt: 38 Sayı: 3, 695 - 710, 27.12.2025

Mehmet Yusuf Berk , Duygu Bilen

https://doi.org/10.19171/uefad.1568310

Öz

The present research aimed to examine the chemical literacy levels of high school students and to analyze these levels in terms of various variables (gender, grade level, academic achievement, and parental education level). The study was conducted using the survey design. The population of the study consisted of high school students studying in the Kulp district of Diyarbakır. The research sample comprised 617 students. The “Chemical Literacy Scale” developed by Meydan (2022) was used as a data collection tool. The Research findings revealed that the students’ chemical literacy was above average. There was no statistically significant difference between the chemical literacy levels of male and female students. However, grade level, chemistry grade point average, and parents’ education level were found to be significant variables affecting students’ chemical literacy levels.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Chemistry , Chemical literacy , Chemical literacy scale , High school students

Ortaöğretim Öğrencilerinin Kimya Okuryazarlıklarının İncelenmesi

Öz

Bu araştırmada, ortaöğretim öğrencilerinin kimya okuryazarlık düzeylerinin belirlenmesi ve çeşitli değişkenler (cinsiyet, sınıf düzeyi, akademik başarı, ebeveyn eğitim durumu) açısından incelenmesi amaçlanmıştır. Çalışma tarama modeline göre yürütülmüştür. Araştırma evrenini Diyarbakır’ın Kulp ilçesinde öğrenim gören ortaöğretim öğrencileri oluşturmaktadır. Çalışma örneklemi ise 617 öğrenci olarak belirlenmiştir. Araştırmada veri toplama aracı olarak Meydan (2022) tarafından geliştirilen “Kimya Okuryazarlık Ölçeği” kullanılmıştır. Araştırmanın bulguları incelendiğinde ortaöğretim öğrencilerinin kimya okuryazarlıklarının orta düzeyin üzerinde olduğu sonucuna ulaşılmıştır. Kız ve erkek öğrencilerin kimya okuryazarlık düzeyleri arasında istatistiksel açıdan anlamlı fark bulunmadığı saptanmıştır. Sınıf düzeyi, kimya not ortalaması, anne eğitim durumu, baba eğitim durumu değişkenlerinin ise öğrencilerin kimya okuryazarlık düzeyleri arasında anlamlı farklılık yaratan değişkenler olduğu tespit edilmiştir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Kimya , Kimya okuryazarlığı , Kimya okuryazarlığı ölçeği , Ortaöğretim öğrencileri

Kaynakça

• Çelik, S. (2014). Chemical literacy levels of science and mathematics teacher candidates. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 39(1), 1–15. http://dx.doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2014v39n1.5.
• Çiğdemoğlu, C. (2012). Effectiveness of context-based approach through 5e learnıng cycle model on students’ understanding of chemical reactions and energy concepts, and their motivation to learn chemistry (Publication no. 318942) [Doctoral thesis, Middle East Technical University]. Council of Higher Education Thesis Center.
• Fahmina, S. S., Indriyanti, N. Y., Setyowati, W. A. E., Masykuri, M., & Yamtinah, S. (2019). Dimension of chemical literacy and its influence in chemistry learning. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1233(1), 012026. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1233/1/012026
• Gezer, M. (2021). Sample selection and sampling methods. In B. Çetin, M. İlhan & M. G. Şahin (Eds.), Research methods in education: Basic concepts, principles and processes (p. 133-159). Pegem.
• Hofstein, A., & Mamlok-Naaman, R. (2007). The laboratory in science education: The state of the art. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 8(2), 105–107. https://doi.org/10.1039/B7RP90003A
• Hofstein, A., & Lunetta, V. N. (2004). The laboratory in science education: Foundations for the twenty-first century. Science Education, 88(1), 28-54. http://dx.doi.org /10.1002/sce.10106
• İlhan, M., & Gezer, M. (2021). Araştırmaların sınıflandırılması. B. Çetin, M. İlhan ve M. G. Şahin (Eds.), Eğitimde araştırma yöntemleri içinde (s. 101–132). Pegem.
• Jufrida, J., Basuki, F.R., Kurniawan, W., Pangestu, M.D., & Fitaloka, O. (2019). Scientific literacy and science learning achievement in secondary school. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education, 8(4), 630-636. http://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v8i4.20312
• Keskin, H., Tezel, Ö., & Acat, M. B. (2016). Ortaokul öğrencilerinin fen bilimleri dersine ilişkin bilimsel içerik bilgi seviyeleri. Eskişehir Osmangazi Üniversitesi Türk Dünyası Uygulama ve Araştırma Merkezi Eğitim Dergisi, 1(1), 19-38.
• Ministry of National Education. (2018). High school (Grades 9, 10, 11, 12) chemistry course curriculum. https://mufredat.meb.gov.tr/Dosyalar/201812102955190-19.01.2018%20Kimya%20Dersi%20%C3%96%C4%9Fretim%20Program%C4%B1.pdf
• Ministry of National Education. (n.d). Statistics of strategy development department https://istatistik.meb.gov.tr/OgrenciSayisi/OkulTuruneGore Date of access: 21 August 2023
• Meydan, E. (2022). Chemical literacy scale: Scale development study. RumeliDE Journal of Language and Literature Studies, 29, 224–240. http://dx.doi.org/10.29000/rumelide.1164160
• Özmen, H., Ayas, A., & Coştu, B., (2002). Fen bilgisi öğretmen adaylarının maddenin tanecikli yapısı hakkındaki anlama seviyelerinin ve yanılgılarının belirlenmesi. Kuram ve Uygulamada Egitim Bilimleri , 2(2), 507-529.
• Prastiwi, M.N., & Laksono, E.W. (2018). The ability of analytical thinking and chemical literacy in high school students learning. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1097. http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1097/1/012061
• Salcı, E., & Aydın, A. (2021). Secondary school students’ universal science literacy levels. IBAD Journal of Social Sciences, 10, 202–219. https://doi.org/10.21733/ibad.879341
• Shwartz, Y., Ben-Zvi, R., & Hofstein, A. (2006). The use of scientific literacy taxonomy for assessing the development of chemical literacy among high-school students. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 7(4), 203–225. http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/b6rp90011a
• Soysal, M. (2011). A study on the comparison of students’ success at science and technology subject and of their scientific literacy level and an analysıs of teachers’ views about scientific literacy (Publication No. 299923). [Master’s thesis, Çukurova University]. Council of Higher Education Thesis Center.
• Süren, T. (2008). Scientific literacy levels of elementary school students at primary schools (Publication No. 219392). [Master’s thesis, Afyon Kocatepe University]. Council of Higher Education Thesis Center.
• Thummathong, R., & Thathong, K. (2018). Chemical literacy levels of engineering students in Northeastern Thailand. Kasetsart Journal of Social Sciences, 39(3), 478–487. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.kjss.2018.06.009
• Tunç Şahin, C. & Say, Ö. (2010). İlköğretim Öğrencilerinin bilimsel okuryazarlık düzeylerinin incelenmesi. ZKÜ Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 6(11), 223–240.
• Wen, C.T., Liu, C.C., Chang, H.Y., Chang, C.J., Chang, M.H., Chiang, S.H.F., & Hwang, F.K. (2020). Students’ guided inquiry through simulation and its relationship to school science achievement and scientific literacy. Computers and Education, 149, 103830. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.103830
• Wiyarsi, A., Pratomo, H., & Priyambodo, E. (2020). Vocational high school students’ chemical literacy on context-based learning: A case of petroleum topic. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 17(1), 147–161. http://dx.doi.org/10.36681/tused.2020.18
• Yazıcıoğlu, Y. & Erdoğan, S. (2004). Spss uygulamalı bilimsel araştırma yöntemleri. Detay.
• Yıldırır, H. E., & Yıldırım, A. (2023). Investigation of pre-service science teacher's understandings about chemical representations. Journal of Balıkesir University Institute of Science and Technology, 25(1), 164-185. https://doi.org/10.25092/baunfbed.1062368
• Yustin, D. L., & Wiyarsi, A. (2019). Students’ chemical literacy: A study in chemical bonding. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1397(1), 012036. http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1397/1/012036
• Yüksel, M., Dağdeviren, M., & Kabak, M. (2018). An analysis of the factors determining the effectiveness of chemistry education by using fishbone analysis and ahp-promethee techniques. Necatibey Faculty of Education Electronic Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 12(1), 442–472. http://dx.doi.org/10.17522/balikesirnef.437833