Enabling Pre-service Chemistry Teachers' Development of Technological, Pedagogical, and Content Knowledge (TPACK) through Case-Based Lesson Planning

Öz

This study aimed to enable technological, pedagogical, and content knowledge (TPACK) development among pre-service teachers based on case-based lesson planning. A total of 21 pre-service chemistry teachers having a bachelor’s degree participated in the study during their pedagogical certificate program in Turkey. Data were collected using analysis of instructional plans and open-ended questions. Results showed that case-based lesson planning provided a successful context for helping pre-service teachers to develop content knowledge (CK), technological knowledge (TK), pedagogical knowledge (PK), and TPACK knowledge as the basis for designing effective technology-integrated chemistry lessons.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• TPACK
• case-based teaching
• chemistry instruction
• teacher education

Enabling Pre-service Chemistry Teachers' Development of Technological, Pedagogical, and Content Knowledge (TPACK) through Case-Based Lesson Planning

Öz

This study aimed to enable technological, pedagogical, and content knowledge (TPACK) development among pre-service teachers based on case-based lesson planning. A total of 21 pre-service chemistry teachers having a bachelor’s degree participated in the study during their pedagogical certificate program in Turkey. Data were collected using analysis of instructional plans and open-ended questions. Results showed that case-based lesson planning provided a successful context for helping pre-service teachers to develop content knowledge (CK), technological knowledge (TK), pedagogical knowledge (PK), and TPACK knowledge as the basis for designing effective technology-integrated chemistry lessons.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• TPACK
• case-based teaching
• chemistry instruction
• teacher education

Kaynakça

1. Boubouka, M., Verginis, I., & Grigoriadou, M. (2008). Comparing the implementation of the case study method in the classroom and from distance using a course management system. IADIS International Conference on Cognition and Exploratory Learning in Digital Age, 285-292.
2. Bybee, R., & Landes, N. M. (1990). Science for life and living: An elementary school science program from Biological Sciences Improvement Study (BSCS). The American Biology Teacher, 52(2), 92-98.
3. Camill, P. (2006). Case studies add value to a diverse teaching portfolio in science courses. Journal of College Science Teaching, 36(2), 31-37.
4. Canbazoglu Bilici, S., Guzey, S. S., & Yamak, H. (2016) Assessing pre-service science teachers’ technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) through observations and lesson plans, Research in Science & Technological Education, 34(2), 237-251, DOI: 10.1080/02635143.2016.1144050
5. Causa, M., Savin, A., & Silvi, B. (2014). Atoms and bonds in molecules and chemical explanations. Foundations of Chemistry, 16, 3–26.
6. Chai, C. S., Koh, J. H. L., & Tsai, C.C. (2010). Facilitating pre-service teachers' development of technological, pedagogical, and content knowledge (TPACK). Educational Technology & Society, 13(4), 63–73.
7. Chai, C.-S., Koh, J. H.-L., & Tsai, C.-C. (2013). A review of technological pedagogical content knowledge. Educational Technology & Society, 16(2), 31–51.
8. Chittleborough, G. (2014). Learning how to teach chemistry with technology: Pre-service teachers’ experiences with integrating technology into their learning and teaching. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 25, 373-393. doi: 10.1007/s10972-014-9387-y

9. Doymuş, K., Şimşek, Ü., & Karaçöp, A. (2009). The effects of computer animations and cooperative learning methods in micro, macro and symbolic level learning of states of matter. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 36, 109-128.
10. Gabel, D. L. (1993). Use of the particle nature of matter in developing conceptual understanding. Journal of Chemical Education, 70(3), 193-194.
11. Harris, J., Mishra, P., & and Koehler, M. (2009). Teachers’ technological pedagogical content knowledge and learning activity types: Curriculum-based technology integration reframed. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 41(4), 393–416.
12. Harris, J., & Hofer, M. J. (2011). Technological pedagogical content knowledge in action: A descriptive study of secondary teachers' curriculum-based, technology-related instructional planning. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 43(3), 211–229.
13. Hofer, M. J. and Grandgenett, N. (2012). TPACK development in teacher education: A longitudinal study of preservice teachers in a secondary M.A.Ed. Program. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 45(1), 83–106
14. Johnstone, A.H. (1991). Why is science difficult to learn? Things are seldom what they seem, Journal of Computer Assisted Instruction, 7(1), 75–83.
15. Joo, Y. J., Park, S., & Lim, E. (2018). Factors influencing preservice teachers’ intention to use technology: TPACK, teacher self-efficacy, and technology acceptance model. Educational Technology & Society, 21(3), 48–59.
16. Karolcik, S., & Cipkova, E. (2017). Attitudes among chemistry teachers towards increasing personal competencies in applying ICT. Chemistry Didactics Ecology Metrology, 22(1/2), 99-121.
17. Khan, S. (2011). New pedagogies on teaching science with computer simulations. Journal of Science Education & Technology, 20(3), 215-232. Koehler, M. J., & Mishra, P. (2005). What happens when teachers design educational technology? The development of technological pedagogical content knowledge. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 32(2), 131-152.
18. Koehler, M. J., & Mishra, P. (2009). What is technological pedagogical content knowledge? Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education (CITE Journal), 9(1), 60-70.
19. Koehler, M.J., Mishra, P., & Cain, W. (2013). What is technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK)? Journal of Education, 193(3), 13-19.
20. Koehler, M. J., Mishra, P., Kereluik, K., Shin, T. S., & Graham, C. R. (2014). The technological pedagogical content knowledge framework. In Handbook of Research on Educational Communications and Technology: Fourth Edition (pp. 101-111). Springer New York. DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4614-3185-5_9
21. Koh, J.H.L. (2013). A rubric for assessing teachers' lesson activities with respect to TPACK for meaningful learning with ICT. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 29(6), 887-900.
22. Locatelli, S., Ferreira,C. ve Arroio, A. (2010). Metavisualization: An important skill in the learning chemistry. Problems of Education in the 21st Century, 24, 75-83.
23. McGrath, J., Karabas, G., & Willis. J. (2011). From TPACK concept to TPACK practice: An analysis of the suitability and usefulness of the concept as a guide in the real world of teacher development. International Journal of Technology in Teaching and Learning, 7(1), 1-23.
24. Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017–1054.
25. Mouza, C.& Karchmer-Krein, R. (2013). Promoting and assessing pre-service teachers’ technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) in the context of case development. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 48(2), 127-152.
26. Polly, D. (2011). Developing teachers’ technological, pedagogical, and content knowledge (TPACK) through mathematics professional development. International Journal for Technology in Mathematics Education, 18 (2), 83-96.
27. Scantlebury, K. (2008). Impact of chemistry teachers' knowledge and practices on student achievement. AIP Conference Proceedings 1064, 46
28. Sirhan, G. (2007). Learning difficulties in chemistry: An overview. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 4(2), 2-20.
29. Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4-14.
30. Stieff, M., & Wilensky, U. (2003). Connected chemistry? Incorporating interactive simulations into the chemistry classroom. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 12, 285. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025085023936
31. Talanquer, V. (2011). Macro, submicro, and symbolic: The many faces of the chemistry “triplet”. International Journal of Science Education, 33(2), 179–195.
32. Tatlı, Z. ve Ayas, A. (2013). Effect of a virtual chemistry laboratory on students' achievement. Educational Technology & Society, 16(1), 159–170.
33. Trowbridge, L. W., & Bybee, R. W. (1990). Becoming a secondary school science teacher. Columbus, OH: Merrill Publishing Company.
34. Yadav, A. (2008). What works for them? Preservice teachers' perceptions of their learning from video case. Action in Teacher Education, 29(4), 27-38.
35. Yadav, A., Shaver, G. M., & Meckl, P. (2010). Lessons learned: Implementing the case teaching method in a mechanical engineering course. Journal of Engineering Education, 99(1), 55-69.