THE MEDIATING ROLE OF PROMOTION FOCUS ON THE EFFECT OF ORGANIZATIONAL CITIZENSHIP BEHAVIOR FOR THE ENVIRONMENT ON GREEN INNOVATION: A RESEARCH

Yıl 2024, , 91 - 112, 07.08.2024

Edip Örücü , Itır Hasırcı , Ramazan Özkan Yıldız

https://doi.org/10.18092/ulikidince.1424564

Öz

The aim of research is determine the effects of organizational citizenship for the environment, promotion focus on green innovation in the bank branches. The population is 190,000 personnel working in banks in Turkey. The sample obtained through the online survey consists of 554 personnel selected from these people. Frequency, normality, exploratory factor, reliability, correlation and hierarchical regression were performed with the data obtained. The result of the correlation, a significant, positive relationship was found between organizational citizenship for the environment and green innovation, a significant and positive relationship between organizational citizenship behavior for the environment and promotion focus, a significant, positive relationship between green innovation and promotion focus. According to the results of the hierarchical regression, promotion focus had a partial mediating role in the effect of environmental organizational citizenship on green innovation. When promotion focus was included, organizational citizenship reduced its effect on green innovation, recommendations were offered to increase organizational citizenship.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Organizational Citizenship Behavior for the Environment, Green Innovation, Promotion Focus

ÇEVRECİ ÖRGÜTSEL VATANDAŞLIK DAVRANIŞININ YEŞİL İNOVASYON ÜZERİNDEKİ ETKİSİNDE TERFİ ODAĞININ ARACILIK ROLÜ: BİR ARAŞTIRMA

Öz

Bu araştırmanın amacı banka şubelerinde çevreci örgütsel vatandaşlık davranışı ve terfi odağının yeşil inovasyon üzerindeki etkilerini belirlemektir. Araştırmanın evrenini Türkiye’de banka sektöründe çalışan 190.000 personel oluşturmaktadır. Online anket yöntemiyle elde edilen araştırmanın örneklemini bu kişilerden seçilen 554 personel oluşturmaktadır. Elde edilen verilerle frekans analizi, normallik testi, keşfedici faktör analizi, güvenilirlik analizi, korelasyon analizi ve hiyerarşik regresyon analizleri yapılmıştır. Yapılan korelasyon analizinin neticesinde çevreci örgütsel vatandaşlık davranışı ile yeşil inovasyon arasında anlamlı ve olumlu bir ilişki, çevreci örgütsel vatandaşlık davranışı ile terfi odağı arasında anlamlı ve olumlu bir ilişki, yeşil inovasyonla terfi odağı arasında anlamlı ve olumlu bir ilişki bulunmuştur. Hiyerarşik regresyon analizinin sonucuna göre çevreci örgütsel vatandaşlık davranışının yeşil inovasyon üzerindeki etkisinde terfi odağının kısmi aracılık rolünün olduğu tespit edilmiştir. Dolayısıyla terfi odağı analize dahil edildiğinde çevreci örgütsel vatandaşlık davranışının yeşil inovasyon üzerindeki etkisini azalttığı görülmüş, örneklem dahilindeki banka şubelerinde çevreci örgütsel vatandaşlık davranışını arttıracak tavsiyeler sunulmuştur.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Çevreci Örgütsel Vatandaşlık Davranışı, Yeşil İnovasyon, Terfi Odağı

Kaynakça

• Abbas, J. ve Khan, S. M. (2023). Green Knowledge Management and Organizational Green Culture: An Interaction for Organizational Green Innovation and Green Performance. Journal of Knowledge Management, 27(7), 1852-1870.
• Adams, R., Jeanrenaud, S., Bessant, J., Denyer, D., & Overy, P. (2016). Sustainability‐Oriented Innovation: A Systematic Review. International Journal of Management Reviews, 18(2), 180-205.
• Afsar, B. ve Badir, Y. F. (2016). Person–Organization Fit, Perceived Organizational Support and Organizational Citizenship Behavior: The Role of Job Embeddedness. Journal of Human Resources in Hospitality & Tourism, 15(3), 252-278.
• Alt, E. ve Spitzeck, H. (2016). Improving Environmental Performance Through Unit-Level Organizational Citizenship Behaviors for the Environment: A Capability Perspective. Journal of environmental management, 182, 48-58.
• Asadi, S., Pourhashemi, S. O., Nilashi, M., Abdullah, R., Samad, S., Yadegaridehkordi, E., Aljojo, N. ve Razali, N. S. (2020). Investigating Influence of Green Innovation on Sustainability Performance: A Case on Malaysian Hotel Industry. Journal of Cleaner Production, 258, 120-138.
• Bernauer, T., Engel, S., Kammerer, D. ve Sejas Nogareda, J. (2007). Explaining Green Innovation: Ten Years After Porter's Win-Win Proposition: How to Study the Effects of Regulation on Corporate Environmental Innovation?. Politische Vierteljahresschrift, 39, 323-341.
• Bashirun, S. N., Samudin, N. M. R., Zolkapli, N. M. ve Badrolhisam, N. I. (2019). Fostering Organizational Citizenship Behavior for the Environment in Promoting Employee Green Behavior at the Workplace. International Journal of Business and Management, 3(1), 18-24.
• Blank, T. H. ve Naveh, E. (2018). Competition and Complementation of Exploration and Exploitation and the Achievement of Radical Innovation: The Moderating Effect of Learning Behavior and Promotion Focus. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 66(4), 598-612.
• Boiral, O. (2009). Greening the Corporation Through Organizational Citizenship Behaviors. Journal of Business Ethics, 87, 221-236.
• Boiral, O. ve Paillé, P. (2012). Organizational Citizenship Behaviour for the Environment: Measurement and Validation. Journal of Business Ethics, 109, 431-445.
• Boiral, O., Raineri, N. ve Talbot, D. (2018). Managers’ Citizenship Behaviors for the Environment: A Developmental Perspective. Journal of Business Ethics, 149, 395-409.
• Bryant, P. ve Dunford, R. (2008). The Influence of Regulatory Focus on Risky Decision‐Making. Applied Psychology, 57(2), 335-359.
• Cao, X., Lv, D. ve Xing, Z. (2020). Innovative Resources, Promotion Focus and Responsible Innovation: The Moderating Roles of Adaptive Governance. Sustainability, 12(7), 28-60.
• Castellacci, F. ve Lie, C. M. (2017). A Taxonomy of Green Innovators: Empirical Evidence From South Korea. Journal of Cleaner Production, 143, 1036-1047.
• Chang, T. W., Chen, F. F., Luan, H. D. ve Chen, Y. S. (2019). Effect of Green Organizational Identity, Green Shared Vision and Organizational Citizenship Behavior for the Environment on Green Product Development Performance. Sustainability, 11(3), 617-637.
• Chang, W. J., Hu, D. C. ve Keliw, P. (2021). Organizational Culture, Organizational Citizenship Behavior, Knowledge Sharing and Innovation: A Study of Indigenous People Production Organizations. Journal of Knowledge Management, 25(9), 2274-2292.
• Chen, Y. S. (2008). The Driver of Green Innovation and Green Image–Green Core Competence. Journal of Business Ethics, 81, 531-543.
• Chiou, T. Y., Chan, H. K., Lettice, F. ve Chung, S. H. (2011). The Influence of Greening the Suppliers and Green Innovation on Environmental Performance and Competitive Advantage in Taiwan. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 47(6), 822-836.
• Crowe, E. ve Higgins, E. T. (1997). Regulatory Focus and Strategic Inclinations: Promotion and Prevention in Decision-Making. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 69(2), 117-132.
• Elshaer, I. A., Abdelrahman, M. A., Azazz, A. M., Alrawad, M. ve Fayyad, S. (2022). Environmental Transformational Leadership and Green Innovation in the Hotel Industry: Two Moderated Mediation Analyses. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(24), 168-178.
• Galinsky, A. D., Leonardelli, G. J., Okhuysen, G. A. ve Mussweiler, T. (2005). Regulatory Focus at the Bargaining Table: Promoting Distributive and Integrative Success. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31(8), 1087-1098.
• George, D. ve Mallery, M. (2010). SPSS for Windows Step by Step: A Simple Guide and Reference, 17.0. (10. Baskı). India: Pearson.
• Gilal, F. G., Ashraf, Z., Gilal, N. G., Gilal, R. G. ve Channa, N. A. (2019). Promoting Environmental Performance Through Green Human Resource Management Practices in Higher Education Institutions: A Moderated Mediation Model. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 26(6), 1579-1590.
• Gorman, C. A., Meriac, J. P., Overstreet, B. L., Apodaca, S., McIntyre, A. L., Park, P. ve Godbey, J. N. (2012). A Meta-Analysis of the Regulatory Focus Nomological Network: Work-Related Antecedents and Consequences. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 80(1), 160-172.
• Graves, L. M., Sarkis, J. ve Zhu, Q. (2013). How Transformational Leadership and Employee Motivation Combine to Predict Employee Proenvironmental Behaviors in China. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 35, 81-91.
• Gürbüz, S. ve Şahin, F. (2017). Sosyal Bilimlerde Araştırma Yöntemleri Felsefe-Yöntem-Analiz (4. Baskı). Ankara: Seçkin Yayınları.
• Gürbüz, S. (2021). Amos ile Yapısal Eşitlik Modellemesi: Temel İlkeler ve Uygulamalı Analizler (2. Baskı). Ankara: Seçkin Yayınları.
• Hajikarimi, A., Karimi Jafari, F. ve Namazi, G. (2021). Investigating the Impact of Driving Forces for Green Innovation on Performance with the Moderating Role of Management Commitment and Human Resource Management Practices. Journal of Sustainable Human Resource Management, 3(5), 32-47.
• Han, Z., Wang, Q. ve Yan, X. (2019). How Responsible Leadership Predicts Organizational Citizenship Behavior for the Environment in China. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 40(3), 305-318.
• Haşıloğlu, S. B., Baran, T. ve Aydın, O. (2015). Pazarlama Araştırmalarındaki Potansiyel Problemlere Yönelik Bir Araştırma: Kolayda Örnekleme ve Sıklık İfadeli Ölçek Maddeleri. Pamukkale İşletme ve Bilişim Yönetimi Dergisi, 1, 19-28.
• Higgins, E. T. ve Spiegel, S. (2004). Promotion and Prevention Strategies for Self-Regulation. Handbook of Self-Regulation: Research, Theory and Applications, 1, 171-187.
• Huang, Y. C., Ding, H. B. ve Kao, M. R. (2009). Salient Stakeholder Voices: Family Business and Green Innovation Adoption. Journal of Management & Organization, 15(3), 309-326.
• Hung, T. K., Wang, C. H., Tian, M. ve Yang, Y. J. (2020). A Cross-Level Investigation of Team-Member Exchange on Team and Individual Job Crafting with the Moderating Effect of Regulatory Focus. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(6), 20-44.
• Iftikar, T., Hussain, S., Malik, M. I., Hyder, S., Kaleem, M. ve Saqib, A. (2022). Green Human Resource Management and Pro-Environmental Behaviour Nexus With the Lens of AMO Theory. Cogent Business & Management, 9(1), 212-224.
• Iqbal, S., Farid, T., Ma, J., Khattak, A. ve Nurunnabi, M. (2018). The Impact of Authentic Leadership on Organizational Citizenship Behaviours and the Mediating Role of Corporate Social Responsibility in the Banking Sector of Pakistan. Sustainability, 10(7), 2170-2181.
• Jayaraman, K., Jayashree, S. ve Dorasamy, M. (2023). The Effects of Green Innovations in Organizations: Influence of Stakeholders. Sustainability, 15(2), 11-33.
• Jiang, Z., Lyu, P., Ye, L. ve Wenqian Zhou, Y. (2020). Green Innovation Transformation, Economic Sustainability and Energy Consumption During China’s New Normal Stage. Journal of Cleaner Production, 273, 123-144.
• Jordan, P. C. (2014). Team Innovation and Citizenship Performance: The Effect of Collective Regulatory Focus and Perceived Organizational Support. (Yayımlanmamış Doktora Tezi). Oklahoma State University, Oklahoma.
• Khan, M. A. S., Jianguo, D., Ali, M., Saleem, S. ve Usman, M. (2019). Interrelations Between Ethical Leadership, Green Psychological Climate and Organizational Environmental Citizenship Behavior: A Moderated Mediation Model. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 1977-1987.
• Khan, P. A., Johl, S. K. ve Johl, S. K. (2021). Does Adoption of ISO 56002‐2019 and Green Innovation Reporting Enhance the Firm Sustainable Development Goal Performance? An Emerging Paradigm. Business Strategy and the Environment, 30(7), 2922-2936.
• Liao, Z. ve Long, S. (2018). CEOs' Regulatory Focus, Slack Resources and Firms' Environmental Innovation. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 25(5), 981-990.
• Klewitz, J. ve Hansen, E. G. (2014). Sustainability-Oriented Innovation of SMEs: A Systematic Review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 65, 57-75.
• Li, L., Li, G., Ozturk, I. ve Ullah, S. (2023). Green Innovation and Environmental Sustainability: Do Clean Energy Investment and Education Matter?. Energy & Environment, 34(7), 2705-2720.
• Liu, Z., Mei, S. ve Guo, Y. (2021). Green Human Resource Management, Green Organization Identity and Organizational Citizenship Behavior for the Environment: The Moderating Effect of Environmental Values. Chinese Management Studies, 15(2), 290-304.
• Luo, X. ve Zhang, W. (2021). Green Innovation Efficiency: A Threshold Effect of Research and Development. Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy, 23, 285-298.
• Meng, J., Murad, M., Li, C., Bakhtawar, A. ve Ashraf, S. F. (2022). Green Lifestyle: A Tie Between Green Human Resource Management Practices and Green Organizational Citizenship Behavior. Sustainability, 15(1), 44-64.
• Ming-Horng, W. ve Chieh-Yu, L. (2011). Determinants of Green Innovation Adoption for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises (SMES). African Journal Business Management, 5, 9154–9163.
• Mirvis, P. ve Googins, B. (2018). Engaging Employees as Social Innovators. California Management Review, 60(4), 25-50.
• Norgate, T. ve Jahanshahi, S. (2011). Assessing the Energy and Greenhouse Gas Footprints of Nickel Laterite Processing. Minerals Engineering, 24(7), 698-707.
• Nuryanto, U., Basrowi, B. ve Quraysin, I. (2024). Big Data and IoT Adoption in Shaping Organizational Citizenship Behavior: The Role of Innovation Organizational Predictor in the Chemical Manufacturing Industry. International Journal of Data and Network Science, 8(1), 225-268.
• Ones D. S. ve Dilchert S. (2012). Environmental Sustainability at Work: A Call to Action. Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 5, 444-466.
• Paillé, P. ve Boiral, O. (2013). Pro-Environmental Behavior at Work: Construct Validity and Determinants. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 36, 118-128.
• Perry, M., & Battisti, M. (2011). Sustainable Business and Local Economic Development. Business and Sustainability: Concepts, Strategies and Changes, 3, 121-147.
• Pham, N. T., Tučková, Z. ve Jabbour, C. J. C. (2019). Greening the Hospitality Industry: How Do Green Human Resource Management Practices Influence Organizational Citizenship Behavior in Hotels? A Mixed-Methods Study. Tourism management, 72, 386-399.
• Priyankara, H. P. R., Luo, F., Saeed, A., Nubuor, S. A. ve Jayasuriya, M. P. F. (2018). How Does Leader’s Support for Environment Promote Organizational Citizenship Behaviour for Environment? A Multi-Theory Perspective. Sustainability, 10(1), 271-281.
• Qi, G. Y., Shen, L. Y., Zeng, S. X. ve Jorge, O. J. (2010). The Drivers for Contractors’ Green Innovation: An Industry Perspective. Journal of Cleaner Production, 18(14), 1358-1365.
• Rayner, J. ve Morgan, D. (2018). An Empirical Study of ‘Green’ Workplace Behaviours: Ability, Motivation and Opportunity. Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources, 56(1), 56-78.
• Semin, G. R., Higgins, T., De Montes, L. G., Estourget, Y. ve Valencia, J. F. (2005). Linguistic Signatures of Regulatory Focus: How Abstraction Fits Promotion More than Prevention. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89(1), 36-46.
• Simo, P., Sallan, J. M., Fernandez, V. ve Enache, M. (2016). Change-Oriented Organizational Citizenship Behavior: Analysis of Antecedents Centered on Regulatory Theory Focus at the Workplace. International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 24(2), 261-273.
• Singh, S. K., Del Giudice, M., Chierici, R. ve Graziano, D. (2020). Green Innovation and Environmental Performance: The Role of Green Transformational Leadership and Green Human Resource Management. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 150, 119-132.
• Sterling, A. ve Boxall, P. (2013). Lean Production, Employee Learning and Workplace Outcomes: A Case Analysis Through the Ability‐Motivation‐Opportunity Framework. Human Resource Management Journal, 23(3), 227-240.
• Tresi, D. G. ve Mihelič, K. K. (2020). Going the Extra Mile: Perceived Self-Efficacy, Family-Work Enrichment, Promotion Focus and Organisational Citizenship Behaviour. Društvena Istraživanja, 29(4), 599-619.
• Walker, R. M. (2008). An Empirical Evaluation of Innovation Types and Organizational and Environmental Characteristics: Towards a Configuration Framework. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18(4), 591-615.
• Wallace, C. ve Chen, G. (2006). A Multilevel Integration of Personality, Climate, Self‐Regulation, and Performance. Personnel Psychology, 59(3), 529-557.
• Wang, W. ve Chen, H. (2023). Extrusion Effect or Promotion Effect? The Effect of Environmental Regulation on Enterprise Green Innovation. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 20(3), 17-48.
• Zacher, H. ve de Lange, A. H. (2011). Relations Between Chronic Regulatory Focus and Future Time Perspective: Results of a Cross-Lagged Structural Equation Model. Personality and Individual Differences, 50(8), 1255-1260.
• Zeng, W., Zhou, Y. ve Shen, Z. (2018). Dealing with an Abusive Boss in China: The Moderating Effect of Promotion Focus on Reward Expectancy and Organizational Citizenship Behavior. International Journal of Conflict Management, 29(4), 500-518.
• Zhao, H. ve Zhou, Q. (2019). Exploring the Impact of Responsible Leadership on Organizational Citizenship Behavior for the Environment: A Leadership Identity Perspective. Sustainability, 11(4), 944-964.