Yıl 2020, Cilt , Sayı 26, Sayfalar 97 - 114 2020-01-13

SUSTAINABLE SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT PERFORMANCE EVALUATION IN THE FURNITURE SECTOR
MOBİLYA SEKTÖRÜNDE SÜRDÜRÜLEBİLİR TEDARİK ZİNCİRİ YÖNETİMİ PERFORMANS DEĞERLENDİRMESİ

Muhittin SAĞNAK [1]


Nowadays, organizations give importance to environmental and social factors as well as economic factors in order to meet the needs of customers. The performance evaluation of the chain, defined as sustainable supply chain management, requires a holistic approach. In this context, in this study, a conceptual framework has been developed by considering economic, environmental and social factors in order to evaluate sustainable supply chain performance. The conceptual framework includes both qualitative and quantitative factors. Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) technique was used to calculate the relative importance weights of the factors. Total performance level was determined by weighted scoring method. Operational costs and environmental costs were identified as the most important factors, and the total sustainable supply chain management performance of the organization operating in the furniture sector was calculated.

Günümüzde, kuruluşlar, müşterilerin gereksinimlerini karşılama hedefine yönelik olarak ekonomik faktörlerin yanı sıra, çevresel ve sosyal faktörlere de önem vermektedirler. Sürdürülebilir tedarik zinciri yönetimi olarak tanımlanan zincirin performans değerlendirmesi de bütünsel bir yaklaşım gerektirmektedir. Bu bağlamda, bu çalışmada, sürdürülebilir tedarik zinciri performansının değerlendirmesini yapmak amacıyla ekonomik, çevresel ve sosyal faktörleri dikkate alarak bir kavramsal çerçeve geliştirilmiştir. Kavramsal çerçeve hem nitel, hem nicel faktörler içermektedir. Faktörlerin göreceli önem seviyelerini hesaplamak amacı ile Bulanık Analitik Hiyerarşi Süreci (AHS) tekniği kullanılmıştır. Toplam performans seviyesi ise, ağırlıklı puanlama yöntemi ile bulunmuştur. Operasyonel maliyetler ve çevresel maliyetler en önemli faktörler olarak tespit edilmiş ve mobilya sektöründe faaliyet gösteren kuruluşun toplam sürdürülebilir tedarik zinciri yönetimi performansı hesaplanmıştır.

  • Ahi, P. ve Searcy, C. (2015). An analysis of metrics used to measure performance in green and sustainable supply chains. Journal of Cleaner Production, 86 (1), 360-377.
  • Ates, M.A., Bloemhof, J., van Raaij, E.M. ve Wynstra, F. (2012). Proactive Environmental Strategy in a Supply Chain Context: The Mediating Role of Investments. International Journal of Production Research, 50(4), 1079-1095.
  • Beske, P. ve Seuring, S. (2014). Putting sustainability into supply chain management. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 19(3), 322-331.
  • Caniato, F., Caridi, M., Crippa, L. ve Moretto, A. (2012). Environmental sustainability in fashion supply chains: an exploratory case based research. International Journal of Production Economics, 135(2), 659-670.
  • Carroll, A.B. (1999). Corporate social responsibility: evolution of a definitional construct. Business and Society, 38(3), 268-295.
  • Carter, C.R. ve Rogers, D.S. (2008). A framework of sustainable supply chain management: moving toward new theory. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 38(5), 360-387.
  • Carter, C.R. ve Easton, P.L. (2011). Sustainable supply chain management: Evolution and future directions. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 41(1), 46-62.
  • Chung, S.H., Lee, A.H. ve Pearn, W.L. (2005). Product mix optimization for semiconductor manufacturing based on AHP and ANP analysis. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 25, 1144-1156.
  • Dahlsrud, A. (2008). How corporate social responsibility is defined: an analysis of 37 definitions. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 15(1), 1-13.
  • Dong, C., Shen, B., Chow, P.S., Yang, L. ve Ng, C.T. (2016). Sustainability investment under cap-and-trade regulation. Annals of Operations Research, 240(2), 509-531.
  • Duran, O. ve Aguilo, J. (2008). Computer-aided machine-tool selection based on a Fuzzy-AHP approach. Expert Systems with Applications, 34, 1787-1794.
  • Dünya Çevre ve Kalkınma Komisyonu (WCED) (1987). Our Common Future. Oxford University Press, Oxford, England.
  • Elkington, J. (1998). Partnerships from cannibals with forks: the triple bottom line of 21st-century business. Environmental Quality Management, 8(1), 37-51.
  • Feng, T., Zhao, G. ve Su, K. (2014). The Fit between Environmental Management Systems and Organisational Learning Orientation. International Journal of Production Research, 52(10), 2901-2914.
  • Field, J.M. ve Sroufe, R.P. (2007). The Use of Recycled Materials In Manufacturing: Implications for Supply Chain Management and Operations Strategy. International Journal of Production Research, 45(18–19), 4439-4463.
  • Fisher, C., Bashyal, S. ve Bachman, B. (2012). Demographic impacts on environmentally friendly purchase behaviors. Journal of Targeting Measurement and Analysis for Marketing, 20(3-4), 172-184.
  • Flynn, B.B., Huo, B. ve Zhao, X. (2010). The impact of supply chain integration on performance: a contingency and configuration approach. Journal of Operations Management, 28(1), 58-71.
  • Genovese, A., Acquaye, A.A., Figueroa, A. ve Koh, S.L. (2017). Sustainable supply chain management and the transition towards a circular economy: Evidence and some applications. Omega, 66, 344-357.
  • Gimenez, C. ve Sierra, V. (2013). Sustainable supply chains: Governance mechanisms to greening suppliers. Journal of Business Ethics, 116, 189-203.Glavas, A. ve Mish, J. (2015). Resources and capabilities of triple bottom line firms: going over old or breaking new ground? Journal of Business Ethics, 127(3), 623-642.
  • Gold, S., Seuring, S. ve Beske, P. (2010a). Sustainable supply chain management and inter-organizational resources: A literature review. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 17, 230-245.
  • Gold, S., Seuring, S. ve Beske, P. (2010b). The constructs of sustainable supply chain management – A content analysis based on published case studies. Progress in Industrial Ecology – An International Journal, 7(2), 114-137.
  • Golicic, S.L. ve Smith, C.D. (2013). A meta-analysis of environmentally sustainable supply chain management practices and firm performance. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 49(2), 78-95.
  • Govindan, K., Jha, P.C., Agarwal, V. ve Darbari, J.D. (2019). Environmental management partner selection for reverse supply chain collaboration: A sustainable approach. Journal of Environmental Management, 236(2019), 784-797.
  • Harangozó, G. ve Zilahy, G. (2015). Cooperation between business and non-governmental organizations to promote sustainable development. Journal of Cleaner Production, 89, 18-31.
  • Hart, S.L. (1995). A natural-resource-based view of the firm. The Academy of Management Review, 20(4), 986-1014.
  • Hart, S.L. ve Dowell, G. (2011). Invited editorial: a natural-resource-based view of the firm fifteen years after. Journal of Management, 37(5), 1464-1479.
  • Hassini, E., Surti, C. ve Searcy, C. (2012). A literature review and a case study of sustainable supply chains with a focus on metrics. International Journal of Production Economics, 140, 69-82.
  • Heidrich, O. ve Tiwary, A. (2013). Environmental Appraisal of Green Production Systems: Challenges Faced by Small Companies Using Life Cycle Assessment. International Journal of Production Research, 51(19), 5884-5896.
  • Heikkurinen, P. ve Mäkinen, J. (2018). Synthesising corporate responsibility on organizational and societal levels of analysis: an integrative perspective. Journal of Business Ethics, 49(3), 589-607.
  • Hsueh, C. (2015). A bilevel programming model for corporate social responsibility collaboration in sustainable supply chain management. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 73, 84-95.
  • Kim, J., Park, K., Hwang, Y. ve Park, I. (2010). Sustainable Manufacturing: A Case Study of the Forklift Painting Process. International Journal of Production Research, 48(10), 3061-3078.
  • Kleindorfer, P.R., Singhal, K. ve Wassenhove, L.N. (2005). Sustainable operations management. Production and Operations Management, 14(4), 482-492.
  • Lin, Y.H. ve Tseng, M.L. (2016). Assessing the competitive priorities within sustainable supply chain management under uncertainty. Journal of Cleaner Production, 112, 2133-2144.
  • Linton, J.D., Klassen, R. ve Jayaraman, V. (2007). Sustainable supply chains: an introduction. Journal of Operations Management, 25(6), 1075-1082.
  • Liu, S., Kasturiratne, D. ve Moizer, J. (2012). A hub-and-spoke model for multidimensional integration of green marketing and sustainable supply chain management. Industrial Marketing Management, 41(4), 581-588.
  • Luthra, S. ve Mangla, S.K. (2018). When strategies matter: adoption of sustainable supply chain management practices in an emerging economy’s context. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 138, 194-206.
  • Luzzini, D., Brandon-Jones, E., Brandon-Jones, A. ve Spina, G. (2015). From sustainability commitment to performance: The role of intra- and inter-firm collaborative capabilities in the upstream supply chain. International Journal of Production Economics, 165, 51-63.
  • Mangla, S., Madaan, J. ve Chan, F.T. (2013). Analysis of flexible decision strategies for sustainability-focused green product recovery system. International Journal of Production Research, 51(11), 3428-3442.
  • Manzini, R. ve Accorsi, R. (2013). The new conceptual framework for food supply chain assessment. Journal of Food Engineering, 115(2), 251-263.
  • Margolis, J.D. ve Walsh, J.P. (2003). Misery loves companies: rethinking social initiatives by business. Administrative Science Quarterly, 48(2), 268-305.
  • Memery, J., Megicks, P. ve Williams, J. (2005). Ethical and social responsibility issues in grocery shopping: a preliminary typology. Qualitative Market Research: An International Journal, 8(4), 399-412.
  • Moisander, J. ve Pesonen, S. (2002). Narratives of sustainable ways of living: constructing the self and the other as a green consumer. Management Decision, 40(4), 329-342.
  • Newholm, T. ve Shaw, D. (2007). Studying the ethical consumer: a review of research. Journal of Consumer Behavior, 6(5), 253-270.
  • Önüt, S., Kara, S.S. ve Işık, E. (2009). Long term supplier selection using a combined fuzzy MCDM approach: A case study for a telecommunication company. Expert Systems with Applications, 36, 3887-3895.
  • Paulraj, A. (2011). Understanding the relationships between internal resources and capabilities, sustainable supply management and organizational sustainability. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 47(1), 19-37.
  • Rao, P. ve Holt, D. (2005). Do green supply chains lead to competitiveness and economic performance? International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 25(9), 898-916.
  • Saaty, T.L. (1980). The Analytic Hierarchy Process. McGraw-Hill, New York.
  • Sarkis, J., Zhu, Q. ve Lai, K.H. (2011). An organizational theoretic review of green supply chain management literature. International Journal of Production Economics, 130(1), 1-15.
  • Seuring, S. ve Müller, M. (2008). From a literature review to a conceptual framework for sustainable supply chain management. Journal of Cleaner Production, 16(15), 1699-1710.
  • Seuring, S. ve Gold, S. (2013). Sustainability management beyond corporate boundaries: from stakeholders to performance. Journal of Cleaner Production, 56, 1-6.
  • Sharma, A. ve Kearins, K. (2011). Interorganizational collaboration for regional sustainability: what happens when organizational representatives come together? The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 47(2), 168-203.
  • Simpson, D. (2010). Use of Supply Relationships to Recycle Secondary Materials. International Journal of Production Research, 48(1), 227-249.
  • Srivastava, S.K. (2007). Green supply chain management: a state-of-the-art literature review. International Journal of Management Reviews, 9(1), 53-80.
  • Tanzil, D. ve Beloff, B.R. (2006). Assessing impacts: overview on sustainability indicators and metrics. Environmental Quality Management, 15(4), 41-56.
  • Taticchi, P., Tonelli, F. ve Pasqualino, R. (2013). Performance measurement of sustainable supply chains. International Journal of Production & Performance Management, 62, 782-804.
  • Taylor, K.M. ve Vachon, S. (2018). Empirical research on sustainable supply chains: IJPR’s contribution and research avenues. International Journal of Production Research, 56(1-2), 950-959.
  • Tseng, M.L., Lim, K.M. ve Wong, W.P. (2015). Sustainable supply chain management: a closed-loop network approach. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 115(3), 436-461.
  • Turban, D.B. ve Greening, D.W. (1997). Corporate social performance and organizational attractiveness to prospective employees. The Academy of Management Journal, 40(3), 658-672.
  • Turnhout, E., Hisschemoller, M. ve Eijsackers, H. (2007). Ecological indicators: between the two fires of science and policy. Ecological Indicators, 7, 215-228.
  • Veleva, V. ve Ellenbecker, M. (2001). Indicators of sustainable production: framework and methodology. Journal of Cleaner Production, 9, 519-549.
  • Wolf, J. (2014). The relationship between sustainable supply chain management, stakeholder pressure and corporate sustainability performance. Journal of Business Ethics, 119, 317-328.
  • Xia, D., Chen, B. ve Zheng, Z. (2015). Relationships among circumstance pressure, green technology selection and firm performance Journal of Cleaner Production, 106, 487-496
  • Zadeh, L.A. (1965). Fuzzy sets. Information Control, 8, 338-353.
  • Zhu, Q. ve Sarkis, J. (2004). Relationships between operational practices and performance among early adopters of green supply chain management practices in Chinese manufacturing enterprises. Journal of Operations Management, 22(3), 265-289.
  • Zhu, Q., Geng, Y., Sarkis, J. ve Lai, K.H. (2011). Evaluating green supply chain management among Chinese manufacturers from the ecological modernization perspective. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 47(6), 808-821.
Birincil Dil tr
Konular Sosyal
Bölüm MAKALELER
Yazarlar

Orcid: 0000-0002-0799-0348
Yazar: Muhittin SAĞNAK (Sorumlu Yazar)
Kurum: İZMİR KATİP ÇELEBİ ÜNİVERSİTESİ
Ülke: Turkey


Tarihler

Yayımlanma Tarihi : 13 Ocak 2020

Bibtex @araştırma makalesi { ulikidince560283, journal = {Uluslararası İktisadi ve İdari İncelemeler Dergisi}, issn = {1307-9832}, eissn = {1307-9859}, address = {}, publisher = {Kenan ÇELİK}, year = {2020}, volume = {}, pages = {97 - 114}, doi = {10.18092/ulikidince.560283}, title = {MOBİLYA SEKTÖRÜNDE SÜRDÜRÜLEBİLİR TEDARİK ZİNCİRİ YÖNETİMİ PERFORMANS DEĞERLENDİRMESİ}, key = {cite}, author = {SAĞNAK, Muhittin} }
APA SAĞNAK, M . (2020). MOBİLYA SEKTÖRÜNDE SÜRDÜRÜLEBİLİR TEDARİK ZİNCİRİ YÖNETİMİ PERFORMANS DEĞERLENDİRMESİ. Uluslararası İktisadi ve İdari İncelemeler Dergisi , (26) , 97-114 . DOI: 10.18092/ulikidince.560283
MLA SAĞNAK, M . "MOBİLYA SEKTÖRÜNDE SÜRDÜRÜLEBİLİR TEDARİK ZİNCİRİ YÖNETİMİ PERFORMANS DEĞERLENDİRMESİ". Uluslararası İktisadi ve İdari İncelemeler Dergisi (2020 ): 97-114 <https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/ulikidince/issue/50945/560283>
Chicago SAĞNAK, M . "MOBİLYA SEKTÖRÜNDE SÜRDÜRÜLEBİLİR TEDARİK ZİNCİRİ YÖNETİMİ PERFORMANS DEĞERLENDİRMESİ". Uluslararası İktisadi ve İdari İncelemeler Dergisi (2020 ): 97-114
RIS TY - JOUR T1 - MOBİLYA SEKTÖRÜNDE SÜRDÜRÜLEBİLİR TEDARİK ZİNCİRİ YÖNETİMİ PERFORMANS DEĞERLENDİRMESİ AU - Muhittin SAĞNAK Y1 - 2020 PY - 2020 N1 - doi: 10.18092/ulikidince.560283 DO - 10.18092/ulikidince.560283 T2 - Uluslararası İktisadi ve İdari İncelemeler Dergisi JF - Journal JO - JOR SP - 97 EP - 114 VL - IS - 26 SN - 1307-9832-1307-9859 M3 - doi: 10.18092/ulikidince.560283 UR - https://doi.org/10.18092/ulikidince.560283 Y2 - 2019 ER -
EndNote %0 Uluslararası İktisadi ve İdari İncelemeler Dergisi MOBİLYA SEKTÖRÜNDE SÜRDÜRÜLEBİLİR TEDARİK ZİNCİRİ YÖNETİMİ PERFORMANS DEĞERLENDİRMESİ %A Muhittin SAĞNAK %T MOBİLYA SEKTÖRÜNDE SÜRDÜRÜLEBİLİR TEDARİK ZİNCİRİ YÖNETİMİ PERFORMANS DEĞERLENDİRMESİ %D 2020 %J Uluslararası İktisadi ve İdari İncelemeler Dergisi %P 1307-9832-1307-9859 %V %N 26 %R doi: 10.18092/ulikidince.560283 %U 10.18092/ulikidince.560283
ISNAD SAĞNAK, Muhittin . "MOBİLYA SEKTÖRÜNDE SÜRDÜRÜLEBİLİR TEDARİK ZİNCİRİ YÖNETİMİ PERFORMANS DEĞERLENDİRMESİ". Uluslararası İktisadi ve İdari İncelemeler Dergisi / 26 (Ocak 2020): 97-114 . https://doi.org/10.18092/ulikidince.560283
AMA SAĞNAK M . MOBİLYA SEKTÖRÜNDE SÜRDÜRÜLEBİLİR TEDARİK ZİNCİRİ YÖNETİMİ PERFORMANS DEĞERLENDİRMESİ. UİİİD. 2020; (26): 97-114.
Vancouver SAĞNAK M . MOBİLYA SEKTÖRÜNDE SÜRDÜRÜLEBİLİR TEDARİK ZİNCİRİ YÖNETİMİ PERFORMANS DEĞERLENDİRMESİ. Uluslararası İktisadi ve İdari İncelemeler Dergisi. 2020; (26): 114-97.