Türkiye Yüzyılı Maarif Modeli Fen Bilimleri Dersi Öğretim Programlarının Üst Düzey Düşünme Becerileri Bakımından İncelenmesi

Öz

Bu araştırmada güncellenmiş Fen Bilimleri Dersi Öğretim Programları (FBDÖP)’de üst düzey düşünme becerilerine hangi sınıf seviyesinde ne kadar yer verildiği belirlenmeye çalışılmıştır. Bu kapsamda FBDÖP nitel araştırma yaklaşımı ile analiz edilmiştir. Bu analiz sonucunda ilkokul üçüncü sınıfta sadece kavramsal beceriler başlığı altında iki farklı üst düzey düşünme becerisine yer verildiği ortaya çıkmıştır. Dördüncü sınıfta kavramsal beceriler, beceriler arası ilişkiler ve öğrenme-öğretme uygulamalarında üç farklı beceriye yer verilmiştir. Ortaokul düzeyinde beşinci sınıfta beceriler arası ilişkiler ve öğrenme öğretme uygulamaları kısımlarında üç farklı beceriye yer verilirken, altıncı, yedinci ve sekizinci sınıflarda kavramsal beceriler, beceriler arası ilişkiler ve öğrenme öğretme uygulamaları kısımlarında üst düzey düşünme becerilerine yer verildiği ortaya çıkmıştır. Bir bütün olarak değerlendirildiğinde, FBDÖP’de eleştirel düşünme becerisine en fazla sayıda yer verildiği, en fazla altıncı sınıfta üst düzey düşünme becerilerine yer verildiği ve bu becerilere en fazla sayıda öğrenme-öğretme uygulamaları kısmında yer verildiği sonucu ortaya çıkmıştır. Araştırma sonucunda üst düzey düşünme becerilerinin ilk ve ortaokul seviyesinde daha homojen dağıtılması ve bu becerilerin verilmesinde bir süreklik sağlanması gibi öneriler sunulmuştur.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• fen bilimleri dersi öğretim programları ilkokul
• ortaokul
• üst düzey düşünme becerileri

Investigation of Turkey Century Education Model Science Curricula in terms of Higher Order Thinking Skills

Öz

This study aimed to assess the extent to which higher-order thinking skills are incorporated into the updated Science Education Curriculum (SEC) at different grade levels. In this context, the FBDÖP has been analyzed using a qualitative research approach. This analysis revealed that in third grade, only two higher-order thinking skills were included under the conceptual skills heading. In the fourth grade, three different skills were included in conceptual skills, inter-skill relationships, and teaching-learning practices. At the middle school level, three different skills were included in the sections on inter-skill relationships and teaching-learning practices in the fifth grade. In contrast, higher-order thinking skills were included in the sections on conceptual skills, inter-skill relationships, and teaching-learning practices in grades 6, 7, and 8. When evaluated as a whole, it was found that critical thinking skills received the most attention in the FBDÖP, higher-order thinking skills received the highest number in sixth grade, and these skills received the highest number in the learning-teaching practices section. At the conclusion of the research, recommendations were formulated to promote a more uniform distribution of higher-order thinking skills across elementary and middle school levels, as well as to ensure continuity in the teaching of these skills.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• science curriculum
• primary school
• secondary school
• higher-order thinking skills

Kaynakça

1. Abdullah, A. H., Mokhtar, M., Abd Halim, N. D., Ali, D. F., Mohd Tahir, L., & Abdul Kohar, U. H. (2017). Mathematics teachers’ level of knowledge and practice on the implementation of higher-order thinking skills (HOTS). Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 13(1), 3-17. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2017.00601a
2. Affandy, H., Sunarno, W., Suryana, R., & Harjana. (2024). Integrating creative pedagogy into problem-based learning: The effects on higher-order thinking skills in science education. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 53, 101575. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2024.101575
3. Akyol, C., & Kılıç, F. (2021). Beşinci sınıf fen bilimleri öğretim programı kazanımlarının ve ders kitabının üst düzey düşünme becerileri bağlamında incelenmesi. International Journal of Eurasia Social Sciences, 12(44), 312-335. https://doi.org/10.35826/ijoess.2880
4. Almerich, G., Suárez‐Rodríguez, J., Díaz‐García, I., & Cebrián‐Cifuentes, S. (2020). 21st‐century competences: The relation of ICT competences with higher‐order thinking capacities and teamwork competences in university students. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 36(4), 468-479. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12413
5. Anderson, L. W., & Krathwohl, D. R. (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom's taxonomy of educational objectives: complete edition. Addison Wesley Longman, Inc.
6. Apino, E., & Retnawati, H. (2017, February). Developing instructional design to improve mathematical higher education to order the thinking skills of students. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 812(1), 012100). IOP Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/812/1/012100
7. Arı, S., & Boyraz, C. (2023). K-12 beceri eğitiminde üst düzey düşünme becerileri: Sosyal bilgiler dersi örneği. Milli Eğitim, 52 (Özel Sayı), 601-626. https://doi.org/10.37669/milliegitim.1309163
8. Arkan-Sezgin, K., Çarıkçı, S., & Öntaş, T. (2022). İlkokul programlarında yer alan düşünme becerilerinin incelenmesi. International Anatolia Academic Online Journal, 8(2), 24-42.

9. Araya, R. (2021). What mathematical thinking skills will our citizens need in 20 more years to function effectively in a super smart society? in Inprasitha, M., Changsri, N. and Boonsena, N. (Eds), Proceedings of the 44th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 1, pp. 48-65). Khon Kaen.
10. Aslan, H., & Özyurt, M. (2023). İlkokul dördüncü sınıf fen bilimleri öğretim programının ve uygulamaların öğrencilere üst düzey düşünme becerilerini kazandırma durumlarının incelenmesi. Turkish Studies, 18(2), 379-406. https://doi.org/10.7827/TurkishStudies.62660
11. Barak, M. (2007). Transition from traditional to ICT-enhanced learning environments in undergraduate chemistry courses. Computers & Education, 48(1), 30–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2004.11.004
12. Barnett, J. E., & Francis, A. L. (2012). Using higher-order thinking questions to foster critical thinking: A classroom study. Educational Psychology, 32(2), 201-211. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2011.638619
13. Baron, J. (2000). Thinking and deciding. Cambridge University Press
14. Birgin, O. (2016). Bloom Taksonomisi. E. Bingölbali, S. Arslan, & İ. Ö. Zembat(Eds.). Matematik Eğitiminde Teoriler (ss. 839-860). Pegem Akademi.
15. Bloom, B. S. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives, handbook: The cognitive domain. David McKay.
16. Boeren, E., & Íñiguez-Berrozpe, T. (2022). Unpacking PIAAC’s cognitive skills measurements through engagement with Bloom’s taxonomy. Studies in Educational Evaluation 73, 101151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2022.101151
17. Boddy, N., Watson, K., & Aubusson, P. (2003). A trial of the five Es: A referent model for constructivist teaching and learning. Research in Science Education, 33, 27–42. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023606425452
18. Bulut-Ateş, C., & Aktamış, H. (2024). Investigating the effects of creative educational modules blended with Cognitive Research Trust (CoRT) techniques and problem-based learning (PBL) on students' scientific creativity skills and perceptions in science education. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 51, 101471. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2024.101471
19. Bybee, R. W. (2013). The case for STEM education: Challenges and opportunities. NSTA Press.
20. Changsri, N., Inprasitha, M., Tang, K., Boonsena, N., & Pattanajak, A. (2024). The use of pattern blocks in developing students' higher-order thinking skills. International Journal for Lesson and Learning Studies, 13(4), 246-264. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJLLS-04-2023-0038
21. Cobb, P. (1994). Constructivism in mathematics and science education. Educational Researcher, 23(7), 4. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X023007004
22. Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (2008). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Thousand Oaks: Sage. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781452230153
23. Çepni, S. (2009). Araştırma ve Proje Çalışmalarına Giriş (Geliştirilmiş 4. Baskı). Celepler Matbaacılık. Dünya Ekonomi Forumu (2021). Education, skills, and learning. World Economic Forum. https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2020/10/top-10-work-skills-of-tomorrow-how-long-it-takes-tolearn-them/
24. Dori, Y. J., & Herscovitz, O. (2005). Case‐based long‐term professional development of science teachers. International Journal of Science Education, 27(12), 1413-1446. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690500102946
25. Driver, R., Asoko, H., Leach, J., Mortimer, E., & Scott, P. (1994). Constructing scientific knowledge in the classroom. Educational Researcher, 23, 5–12. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X023007005
26. Ennis, R. H. (2011). The nature of critical thinking: An outline of critical thinking dispositions and abilities. https://education.illinois.edu/docs/default-source/faculty-documents/robertennis/thenatureofcriticalthinking_51711_000.pdf
27. Erol, Y. & Ezberci-Çevik, E. (2023). Yedinci sınıf fen bilimleri ders kitaplarında yer alan fiziksel olaylar konu alanı sorularının üst düzey düşünme becerileri açısından incelenmesi. Fen Bilimleri Öğretimi Dergisi, 11(2), 255-281. https://doi.org/10.56423/fbod.1267586
28. Facione, N. C., & Facione, P. A. (1996). Externalizing the critical thinking in knowledge development and critical judgment. Nursing Outlook, 44(3), 129–136. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0029-6554(06)80005-9
29. Fensham, P. J., & Bellocchi, A. (2013). Higher-order thinking in the chemistry curriculum and its assessment. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 10, 250-264. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2013.06.003
30. Forawi, S. A. (2016). Standard-based science education and critical thinking. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 20, 52-62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2016.02.005
31. Gupta, T., & Mishra, L. (2021). Higher-order thinking skills in shaping the future of students. Psychology and Education, 58(2), 9305–9311.
32. Ghani, I. A., Ibrahim, N. H., Yahaya, N. A., & Surif, J. (2017). Enhancing students' HOTS in laboratory educational activity by using concept map as an alternative assessment tool. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 18(4), 849-874. https://doi.org/10.1039/C7RP00120G
33. Ghanizadeh, A. (2017). The interplay between reflective thinking, critical thinking, self-monitoring, and academic achievement in higher education. Higher Education, 74, 101-114. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-016-0031-y
34. Huang, Y. M., Silitonga, L. M., & Wu. T. T. (2022). Applying a business simulation game in a flipped classroom to enhance engagement, learning achievement, and higher-order thinking skills. Computers & Education, 183, 104494. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2022.104494
35. Hwang, G. J., Lai, C. L., Liang, J. C., Chu, H. C., & Tsai, C. C. (2018). A long-term experiment to investigate the relationships between high school students’ perceptions of mobile learning and peer interaction and higher-order thinking tendencies. Educational Technology Research and Development, 66(1), 75-93. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-017-9540-3
36. Ichsan, I. Z., Sigit, D. V., Miarsyah, M., Ali, A., Arif, W. P., & Prayitno, T. A. (2020). HOTS-AEP: Higher order thinking skills from elementary to master students in environmental learning. European Journal of Educational Research, 8(4), 935-942. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.8.4.935
37. Jansen, T., & Möller, J. (2022). Teacher judgments in school exams: Influences of students' lower-order thinking skills on the assessment of students’ higher-order-thinking skills. Teaching and Teacher Education, 111, 103616. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2021.103616
38. Kalemkuş, J. (2021). Fen bilimleri dersi öğretim programı kazanımlarının 21.yüzyıl becerileri açısından incelenmesi. Anadolu Journal of Educational Sciences International, 11(1), 63-87. https://doi.org/10.18039/ajesi.800552
39. Kıral, B. (2020). Nitel bir veri analizi yöntemi olarak doküman analizi. Siirt Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 8(15), 170-189.
40. Kıryak, Z., Kozaklı Ülger, T., Ülger, B.B., Bozkurt, I., & Çepni, S. (2024). 2018 ve 2024 ilk ve ortaokul fen bilimleri ve matematik dersleri öğretim programları öğrenme çıktılarının karşılaştırılması ve beceriler açısından incelenmesi. Bayburt Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 19(44), 3054-3089. https://doi.org/10.35675/befdergi.1507283
41. King, F. J., Goodson, L., & Rohani, F. (2012). Higher-order thinking skills: Definition, teaching strategies, and assessment. Center for Advancement of Learning and Assessment.
42. Khishfe, R. (2012). Nature of science and decision-making. International Journal of Science Education, 34(1), 67–100. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2011.559490
43. Kuhn, D. (1999). A developmental model of critical thinking. Educational Researcher, 28(2), 16–26. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X028002016
44. Krathwohl, D. R. (2002). A revision of Bloom's taxonomy: An overview. Theory into Practice, 41(4), 212–218. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip4104_2
45. Lee, H. S., & Liu, O. L. (2009). Assessing learning progression of energy concepts across middle school grades: The knowledge integration perspective. Science Education, 94(4), 665-688. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20382
46. Liu, J., Liu, Z., Wang, C., Xu, Y., Chen, J., & Cheng, Y. (2024). K-12 students' higher-order thinking skills: Conceptualization, components, and evaluation indicators. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 52, 101551, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2024.101551.
47. Liu, D., & Zhang, H. (2022). Improving students’ higher-order thinking skills and achievement using WeChat based flipped classroom in higher education. Education and Information Technologies, 27(5), 7281-7302. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-10922-y
48. MEB (2022). PISA 2022 Ulusal Raporu. Ankara. Ölçme, Değerlendirme ve Sınav Hizmetleri Genel Müdürlüğü.
49. MEB (2023). Ortaöğretim Düşünme Eğitimi Dersi Öğretim Programı. Ankara.
50. MEB (2024a). Fen Bilimleri Dersi Öğretim Programı. Milli Eğitim Bakanlığı. Ankara
51. MEB (2024b). Türkiye Yüzyılı Maarif Modeli Öğretim Programları Ortak Metni. Milli Eğitim Bakanlığı. Ankara.
52. MEB (2024c). Türkiye Yüzyılı Maarif Modeli Matematik, Fen Bilimleri ve Türkçe Dersi Öğretim Programlarında Yer Alan Becerilerin PISA Yeterlik Düzeyleri İle İlişkilendirilmesi. Talim ve Terbiye Kurulu Başkanlığı. Ankara.
53. Merriam, S. B. (2009). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation. Jossey-Bass.
54. Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). An expanded sourcebook for qualitative data analysis. Sage Publications.
55. Miri, B., David, B. C., & Uri, Z. (2007). Purposely teaching for the promotion of higher-order thinking skills: A case of critical thinking. Research in Science Education, 37, 353–369. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-006-9029-2
56. Murphy, C., Bianchi, L., McCullagh, J., & Kerr, K. (2013). Scaling up higher-order thinking skills and personal capabilities in primary science: Theory-into-policy-into-practice. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 10, 173-188. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2013.06.005
57. Muhayimana, T., Kwizera, L., & Nyirahabimana, M. R. (2022). Using Bloom’s taxonomy to evaluate the cognitive levels of primary leaving English exam questions in Rwandan schools. Curriculum Perspectives, 42, 51-63. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41297-021-00156-2.
58. National Research Council. [NRC] (2012). A framework for K-12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. The National Academies Press.
59. OECD. (2023). PISA 2022 results: Creative thinking. OECD.
60. Öz, E. (2023). Üst düzey düşünme becerileri ile ilgili araştırmaların bibliyometrik analizi: Türkiye perspektifi. Millî Eğitim, 52 (Özel Sayı), 107-136. https://doi.org/10.37669/milliegitim.1308837
61. Pan, X., Jiang, Q., Huang, L., Zhao, W., & Wang, L. (2019). Design and practice of “Scaffolding +” STEM teaching model: Facing higher-order thinking skills training. Modern Distance Education, 3, 56-64.
62. Resnick, L. B. (1987). Education and learning to think. National Academy Press.
63. Saavedra, A. R., & Opfer, V. D. (2012). Learning 21st-century skills requires 21st-century teaching. Phi Delta Kappan, 94(2), 8-13. https://doi.org/10.1177/003172171209400203
64. Saido, G.M., Saedah, S., Abu, B. B. N., & Omed, S. A. A. (2015). Higher-order thinking skills among secondary school students in science learning. Malaysian Online Journal of Educational Sciences, 3(3), 13-20.
65. Scherer, R., & Tiemann, R. (2014). Evidence on the effects of task interactivity and grade level on thinking skills involved in complex problem-solving. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 11, 48-64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2013.10.003
66. Tajudin, N. A. M., & Chinnappan, M. (2016). The link between higher-order thinking skills, representation, and concepts in enhancing TIMSS tasks. International Journal of Instruction, 9(2), 199-214. https://doi.org/10.12973/iji.2016.9214a
67. Türk Dil Kurumu. (2025). Türk Dil Kurumu sözlükleri. https://sozluk.gov.tr
68. Tobin, K., Kahle, J., & Fraser, B. (1990). Windows into science classrooms: Problems associated with higher-level cognitive learning. Falmer Press.
69. Tobin, K. G., Kahle, J. B., & Fraser, B. J. (Eds.). (1990). Windows into science classrooms: Problems associated with higher-level cognitive learning. Psychology Press.
70. Ünveren-Kapanadze, D. (2018). Türkçe öğretim programındaki kazanımların üst düzey düşünme becerileri bağlamında incelenmesi. Millî Eğitim, 48(223), 83-111.
71. Watts, M., Jofili, Z., & Bezerra, R. (1997). A case for critical constructivism and critical thinking in science education. Research in Science Education, 27(2), 309–322. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02461323
72. Wijnen, F., Walma van der Molen, J. & Voogt, J. (2023). Primary teachers’ attitudes towards using new technology and stimulating higher-order thinking in students: A profile analysis. Education and Information Technology, 28, 6347–6372. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11413-w
73. Wu, T. T., Sari, N. A. R. M., & Huang, Y. M. (2024). Integrating extended formative assessment in flipped jigsaw learning: Promoting learning engagement and higher-order thinking skills in the international business education context. The International Journal of Management Education, 22(1), 100930. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijme.2024.100930
74. Yang, Y. T. C. (2015). Virtual CEOs: A blended approach to digital gaming for enhancing higher-order thinking and academic achievement among vocational high school students. Computers & Education, 81, 281-295. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2014.10.004
75. Yanti, F. A., & Thohir, M. A. (2024). Higher order thinking skills in science learning: a systematic review from 2014-2023. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education, 13(4), 2419-2427. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v13i4.28082
76. Yıldırım, A., & Şimşek, H. (2006). Sosyal Bilimlerde Nitel Araştırma Yöntemleri (6. Baskı). Seçkin Yayıncılık.
77. Yılmaz, M., Arıcı, F., & Dilber, R. (2017). Altı şapkalı düşünme tekniğinin 7. sınıf öğrencilerinin akademik başarılarına etkisi. Researcher: Social Science Studies, 5(8), 128-139. https://doi.org/10.18301/rss.193
78. Zhou, Y., Gan, L., Chen, J., Wijaya, T. T., & Li, Y. (2023). Development and validation of higher-order thinking skills assessment scale for pre-service teachers. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 48, 101272, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2023.101272.
79. Zohar, A., & Barzilai, S. (2013). A review of research on metacognition in science education: current and future directions. Studies in Science Education, 49(2), 121–169. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057267.2013.847261
80. Zohar, A., & Dori, Y. J. (2003). Higher-order thinking skills and low-achieving students: Are they mutually exclusive?. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 12(2), 145-181. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327809JLS1202_1
81. Zohar, A., Degani, A., & Vaaknin, E. (2001). Teachers’ beliefs about low-achieving students and higher-order Thinking. Teaching and Teacher Education, 17(4), 469-485. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0742-051X(01)00007-5