İŞGÖRENLERİN SİNİZM SEVİYESİ İLE MOTİVASYONU ARASINDAKİ İLİŞKİ

Öz

Bu araştırmada, iş görenlerin sinizm, mizaçsal sinizm, örgütsel sinizm ve motivasyon seviyeleri arasındaki ilişkiler araştırılmıştır. Araştırmanın birinci amacı: farklı ekonomik ve sosyal yapılara (farklı demografik özelliklere) sahip olan iş görenlerin sinizm, mizaçsal sinizm, örgütsel sinizm ve motivasyon açılarından benzerlik ve farklılıklarını tespit etmektir. İkinci amaç: iş görenlerin sinizm düzeyleri ile işyerinde çalışma motivasyonları arasındaki ilişkileri ortaya koymaktır. Araştırmanın üçüncü amacı: bireylerin psikoekonomik durumları ile sinizm düzeyleri arasındaki ilişkileri test etmektir. Bu deneysel çalışmada tarama yöntemi kullanılmıştır. Analiz bulgularına göre; iş görenlerin örgütsel sinizm düzeyleri yaş gruplarına göre, motivasyon düzeyleri ise deneyim ve haftalık çalışma süresine göre farklılık göstermektedir. Ayrıca, iş görenlerin örgütsel sinizm düzeyi ile motivasyon düzeyi arasında korelasyon bulunmuştur.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• sinizm
• örgütsel sinizm
• psikoekonomi
• motivasyon

THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN SYNICISM LEVEL AND MOTIVATION OF EMPLOYEE

Öz

In this research it is planned to determine the relations between syinicism, personal synicism, organizational cynicism and motivation levels of employee. The main purpose of this research is to determine the differences and similarities of employee who have different economical and social structures (different demographic features) in terms of synicism, personal synicism, organizational synicism and motivation. The second purpose is: to reveal the relationship between synicism level and work motivation of employee. The third purpose is to determine the relations between synicism levels and psychoeconomic status of individuals. The method of this experimental research is statistical scanning method. According to findings of analises, organizational synicism levels differ due to age, motivation levels differ due to experience and working time per week. Also, correlation found between organizational synicism and motivation.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Synicism
• organizational synicism
• psychoeconomy
• motivation

Kaynakça

1. Bernerth, J. B., Armenakis, A. A., Feild, H. S., & Walker, H. J. (2007). Justice, cynicism, and commitment: A study of important organizational change variables. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 43(3), 303-326.
2. Brandes, P. M. (1997). Organizational cynicism: Its nature, antecedents, and consequences. Doctoral dissertation, University of Cincinnati.
3. Cole, M. S., Bruch, H., & Vogel, B. (2006). Emotion as mediators of the relations between perceived supervisor support and psychological hardiness on employee cynicism. Journal of Organizational Behavior, The International Journal of Industrial, Occupational and Organizational Psychology and Behavior, 27(4), 463-484.
4. Dean Jr, J. W., Brandes, P., & Dharwadkar, R. (1998). Organizational cynicism. Academy of Management review, 23(2), 341-352.
5. Diener, E. D., Emmons, R. A., Larsen, R. J., & Griffin, S. (1985). The satisfaction with life scale. Journal of personality assessment, 49(1), 71-75.
6. Eaton, J. A. (2000). A social motivation approach to organizational cynicism. York University.
7. FitzGerald, M. R. (2002). Organizational cynicism: Its relationship to perceived organizational injustice and explanatory style. Doctoral dissertation, University of Cincinnati.
8. Hills, P., & Argyle, M. (2002). The Oxford Happiness Questionnaire: a compact scale for the measurement of psychological well-being. Personality and individual differences, 33(7), 1073-1082.

9. James,M.S.(2005).Antecedents and consequences of cynicism in organizations:An examination of the potential positive and negative effects on school systems. Doctoral dissertation of The Florida State University.
10. Kim, T. Y., Bateman, T. S., Gilbreath, B., & Andersson, L. M. (2009). Top management credibility and employee cynicism: A comprehensive model. Human Relations, 62(10), 1435-1458.
11. Mirvis, P. H., & Kanter, D. L. (1991). Beyond demography: A psychographic profile of the workforce. Human Resource Management, 30(1), 45-68.
12. Pavot, W., & Diener, E. (1993). Review of the satisfaction with life scale. In Assessing well-being (pp. 101-117). Springer, Dordrecht.
13. Rubin, R. S., Dierdorff, E. C., Bommer, W. H., & Baldwin, T. T. (2009). Do leaders reap what they sow? Leader and employee outcomes of leader organizational cynicism about change. The Leadership Quarterly, 20(5), 680-688.
14. Scott,K.A.& Zweig, D.(2008).Dispositional predictors of organizational cynicism, Halifax,Nova Scotia.
15. Springer, K. W., & Hauser, R. M. (2006). An assessment of the construct validity of Ryff’s scales of psychological well-being: Method, mode, and measurement effects. Social science research, 35(4), 1080-1102.
16. Stanley, D. J., Meyer, J. P., & Topolnytsky, L. (2005). Employee cynicism and resistance to organizational change. Journal of business and psychology, 19(4), 429-459.
17. Uslu, E. (2019). Doğrudan Pazarlama Çalışanlarında Duygusal Zeka, Performans Algısı, Motivasyon İlişkisi: Ankara İli Çağrı Merkezi Çalışanları Örneği. Yayınlanmamış Doktora Tezi. Kırıkkale: Kırıkkale Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü.
18. Wanous, J. P., Reichers, A. E., & Austin, J. T. (1994). Organizational Cynicism: An Initial Study. In Academy of Management Proceedings (Vol. 1994, No. 1, pp. 269-273). Briarcliff Manor, NY 10510: Academy of Management. Wrightsman L. S. (1992), Assumptions about Human Nature Implications for Researchers and Practitioners. Sage Publications, Inc., Newbury Park.
19. Yazıcıoğlu, Y. ve Erdoğan, S., (2004). SPSS Uygulamalı Bilimsel Araştırma Yöntemleri, Detay Yayıncılık, Ankara.