Analysis of the Blockchain Technology Features and the Comparison between Sectors with DEMATEL and WASPAS

Yıl 2024, Cilt: 15 Sayı: 42, 404 - 421, 29.05.2024

Tuğrul Kandemir , Arif Arifoğlu , Elçin Güneş

https://doi.org/10.21076/vizyoner.1311130

Öz

It is foreseen that blockchain technology would be more integrated into various fields such as health, law, supply chain and logistics, information technologies, energy, in addition to finance sector. Based on this foresight, the starting point of the study is to determine which features come to the fore in preference of blockchain technology and the sectors where its utilization holds greater significance. In this direction, the study aims to identify the importance level of the features of blockchain technology and the level of preference for adopting blockchain technology across the sectors. In the first stage, the importance level of the features of blockchain technology is determined using the DEMATEL. In the second stage, the preference level for adopting blockchain technology across different sectors is investigated through the WASPAS. The findings show that transparency, independence, and immutability are the three most crucial characteristics of blockchain technology. Furthermore, the law sector, followed by the public sector and insurance sector, are identified as the top three sectors where the preference for utilizing this technology is expected to be the highest. These findings emphasize the need to expand the focus of blockchain technology beyond the finance sector and explore it in various other domains.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Blockchain Technology, Information Technologies, Multi-Criteria Decision-Making, DEMATEL, WASPAS

Etik Beyan

For this study the approval of ethical committee no 190812 dated 21.06.2023 was taken from the Ethical Committee, Afyon Kocatepe University.

Blok Zinciri Teknolojisine Ait Özelliklerin ve Sektörler Arası Kıyaslamanın DEMATEL ve WASPAS ile Analizi

Öz

Blok zinciri teknolojisinin finans sektörünün yanında sağlık, hukuk, tedarik zinciri ve lojistik, bilişim teknolojileri, enerji gibi birçok alana daha fazla entegre edileceği öngörülmektedir. Bu öngörüden hareketle, hangi özelliklerin blok zinciri teknolojisinin tercih edilmesinde ön plana çıktığının ve bu teknolojiyi kullanmanın hangi alanlar için daha fazla önem taşıdığının tespiti, bu çalışmanın çıkış noktasını oluşturmaktadır. Bu doğrultuda çalışmada, blok zinciri teknolojisinin sahip olduğu özelliklerin önem derecesi ve bu teknolojiyi kullanmanın sektörlere göre tercih edilebilme düzeyinin tespit edilmesi amaçlanmıştır. Birinci aşamada DEMATEL yöntemi ile blok zinciri teknolojisinin sahip olduğu özelliklerin önem derecesi belirlenmiştir. İkinci aşamada ise WASPAS yöntemi ile blok zinciri teknolojisini kullanmanın sektörlere göre tercih edilebilme düzeyi araştırılmıştır. Bulgular, blok zincir teknolojisinin en önemli ilk üç özelliğinin şeffaflık, bağımsızlık ve değiştirilemezlik olduğunu göstermektedir. Bunun yanında, hukuk, kamu ve sigortacılık sektörlerinin ise bu teknolojinin en çok tercih edilebileceği ilk üç sektör olduğu tespit edilmiştir. Elde edilen bulgular, blok zinciri teknolojisinin günümüzde yaygın olarak kullanıldığı finans sektörünün yanında, birçok farklı alanın da odağına alınması gerektiğini göstermektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Block Zinciri Teknolojisi, Bilgi Teknolojileri, Çok Kriterli Karar Verme, DEMATEL, WASPAS

Etik Beyan

Bu çalışma için Afyon Kocatepe Üniversitesi Etik Kurulundan 190812 sayılı ve 21.06.2023 tarihli etik kurul onayı alınmıştır.

Kaynakça

• Adalı, E. A. ve Işık, A. T. (2017). Bir tedarikçi seçim problemi için SWARA ve WASPAS yöntemlerine dayanan karar verme yaklaşımı. International Review of Economics and Management, 5(4), 56-77. https://doi.org/10.18825/iremjournal.335408
• Agi, M. A. N. (2022). understanding the enablers of blockchain technology adoption in sustainable supply chains: A DEMATEL-based analysis, Ifac-Papersonline, 55(10), 1962-1967. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifacol.2022.09.686
• Akçakanat, Ö., Eren, H., Aksoy, E. ve Ömürbek, V. (2017). Bankacılık sektöründe ENTROPI ve WASPAS yöntemleri ile performans değerlendirmesi. Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 22(2), 285-300.
• Almutairi, K., Dehshiri, S. J. H., Dehshiri, S. S. H., Hoa, A. X., Dhanraj, J. A., Mostafaeipour, A., Issakhov, A. ve Techato, K. (2022). Blockchain technology application challenges in renewable energy supply chain management. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 1-18, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-18311-7
• Antonucci, F., Figorilli, S., Costa, C., Pallottino, F., Raso, L. ve Menesatti, P. (2019), A Review on blockchain applications in the agri-food sector. J. Sci. Food Agric., 99, 6129-6138. https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.9912
• Azizi, N., Malekzadeh, H., Akhavan, P., Haass, O., Saremi, S. ve Mirjalili, S. (2021). Iot–blockchain: Harnessing the power of ınternet of thing and blockchain for smart supply chain. Sensors, 21, 6048, 1-25. https://doi.org/10.3390/s21186048
• Baiod, W., Light, J. ve Mahanti, A. (2021). Blockchain technology and its applications across multiple domains: A survey, Journal of International Technology and Information Management, 29(4), 78-119. https://doi.org/10.58729/1941-6679.1482
• Baušys, R. ve Juodagalvienė, B. (2017). Garage location selection for residential house by WASPAS-SVNS method, Journal of Civil Engineering and Management, 23(3), 421-429. https://doi.org/10.3846/13923730.2016.1268645
• Biswas, B. ve Gupta, R. (2019). Analysis of barriers to ımplement blockchain in ındustry and service sectors. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 136, 225-241. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2019.07.005
• Boutkhoum, O., Hanine, M., Nabil, M., El Barakaz, F., Lee, E., Rustam, F. ve Ashraf, I. (2021). Analysis and evaluation of barriers influencing blockchain implementation in moroccan sustainable supply chain management: An integrated ifahp-dematel framework. Mathematics, 9(14), 1601, 1-23. https://doi.org/10.3390/math9141601
• Braga, I. F. B., Ferreira, F. A. F., Ferreira, J. J. M., Correia, R. J. C., Pereira, L. F. ve Falcão, P. F. (2021). A DEMATEL analysis of smart city determinants, Technology in Society, 66, 101687, 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2021.101687
• Bulut, E. ve Akçacı, T. (2017). Endüstri 4.0 ve inovasyon göstergeleri kapsamında Türkiye analizi. ASSAM Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi, 7, 50-72.
• Cagigas, D., Clifton, J., Diaz-Fuentes, D. ve Fernadez-Gutierrez, M. (2021). Blockchain for Public Services: A Systematic Literature Review, IEEE Access, 9, 13904-13921. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3052019
• Casino, F., Dasaklis, T. K. ve Patsakis, C. (2019). A systematic literature review of blockchain-based applications: Current status, classification and open issues, Telematics and Informatics, 36, 55-81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2018.11.006
• Chen, P., Cai, B., Wu, M. ve Zhao, Y. (2022). Obstacle analysis of application of blockchain technology in power data trading based on ımproved DEMATEL–ISM method under fuzzy environment. Energy Reports, 8, 4589-4607. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyr.2022.03.043
• Chen, L., Hendalianpour, A., Feylizadeh, M. R. ve Xu, H. (2023). Factors affecting the use of blockchain technology in humanitarian supply chain: A novel fuzzy large-scale group-DEMATEL. Group Decision and Negotiation, 1-36, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10726-022-09811-z
• Ecer, F. (2020). Çok Kriterli Karar Verme Geçmişten Günümüze Kapsamlı Bir Yaklaşım (1. Baskı). Seçkin Yayınevi.
• Erol, İ., Ar, İ. M. ve Peker, İ. (2022). Scrutinizing blockchain applicability in sustainable supply chains through an integrated fuzzy multi-criteria decision making framework. Applied Soft Computing, 116, 108331, 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2021.108331
• Farooque, M., Jain, V., Zhang, A. ve Li, Z. (2020). Fuzzy Dematel analysis of barriers to blockchain-based life cycle assessment in China. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 147, 106684, 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2020.106684
• Gibson, C. T. ve Kirk, T. (2016). Blockchain 101 for asset managers. The Investment Lawyer Covering Legal and Regulatory Issues of Asset Management, 23(10), 1-8.
• Gökgöz, H. ve Kandemir, T. (2023). Trampadan kripto paraya. Nobel Yayıncılık.
• İndap, Ş. (2022). Tarım-gıda tedarik zincirinde izlenebilirlik ve gıda güvenliği için blok zinciri: Kiraz ürünü uygulaması. [Doktora Tezi]. Maltepe Üniversitesi.
• Kalsgonda, V. P. ve Kulkarni, R. V. (2020). Applications of Blockchain in Insurance Industry: A Review, PIMT Journal of Research, 12(4), 1-3. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.23708.72322
• Karabasevic, D., Stanujkic, D., Urosevic, S. ve Maksimovic, M. (2016). An approach to personnel selection based on SWARA and WASPAS methods. Journal of Economics, Management and Informatics, 7(1), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.5937/bizinfo1601001K
• Lee, H.-S., Tzeng, G.-H., Yeih, W., Wang, Y.-J. ve Yang, S.-C. (2013). Revised DEMATEL: Resolving the ınfeasibility of DEMATEL. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 37(10-11), 6746-6757. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apm.2013.01.016
• Lin, I.-C. ve Liao, T.-C. (2017). A survey of blockchain security ıssues and challenges. International Journal of Network Security, 19, 653-659. https://doi.org/10.6633/IJNS.201709.19(5).01)
• Maden, A. ve Alptekin, S. (2020). Evaluation of factors affecting the decision to adopt blockchain technology: A logistics company case study using fuzzy dematel. Journal Of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems. 39, 6279-6291. https://doi.org/10.3233/jıfs-189096
• Mardani, A., Nilashi, M., Zakuan, N., Loganathan, N., Soheilirad, S., Saman, M. Z. M. ve Ibrahim, O. (2017). A systematic review and meta-analysis of SWARA and WASPAS methods: Theory and applications with recent fuzzy developments. Applied Soft Computing, 57, 265-292. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2017.03.045
• Modgil, S. ve Sonwaney, V. (2019). Planning the application of blockchain technology in identification of counterfeit products: Sectorial prioritization. Ifac-Papersonline, 52(13), 1-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifacol.2019.11.080
• Mukherjee, P. ve Pradhan, C. (2021). Blockchain 1.0 to blockchain 4.0—the evolutionary transformation of blockchain technology. S. K. Panda, A. K. Jena, S. K. Swain ve S. C. Satapathy (Ed.), Blockchain technology: Applications and challenges içinde (s. 29-49). Springer Yayınevi. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-69395-4_3
• Munim, Z. H., Balasubramaniyan, S., Kouhizadeh, M. ve Hossain, N. U. I. (2022). Assessing blockchain technology adoption in the norwegian oil and gas industry using bayesian best worst method. Journal of Industrial Information Integration, 28, 100346, 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jii.2022.100346
• Özdemir, A. I., Erol, I., Ar, I. M., Peker, I., Asgary, A., Medeni, T. D. ve Medeni, I. T. (2020). The role of blockchain in reducing the impact of barriers to humanitarian supply chain management. The International Journal of Logistics Management, 32(2), 454-478. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJLM-01-2020-0058
• Özyüksel, S. ve Ekinci, M. (2020). Blockchain teknolojisinin dış ticarete etkisinin örnek projeler çerçevesinde incelenmesi. İşletme Ekonomi ve Yönetim Araştırmaları Dergisi, 3(1), 82-101. https://doi.org/10.33416/baybem.648600
• Sarkhosh, S. M. H. ve Akhavan, P. (2023). Evaluating preparedness in using blockchains for electronic health record systems, The Electronic Library, 41(1), 87-110. https://doi.org/10.1108/EL-05-2022-0104
• Si, S.-L., You, X.-Y., Liu, H. C. ve Zhang, P. (2018). DEMATEL technique: A systematic review of the state-of-the-art literature on methodologies and applications. Mathematical Problems in Engineering, 2018, 3696457, 1-34. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/3696457
• Singh R., Khan S., Dsilva J. ve Centobelli P. (2023) Blockchain ıntegrated ıot for food supply chain: A grey based Delphi-DEMATEL approach. Applied Sciences, 13(2), 1079, 1-22. https://doi.org/10.3390/app13021079
• Swan, M. (2015). Blockchain: Blueprint for a new economy. O’Reilly Media Inc.
• Tayalı, H. A. (2017). Tedarikçi seçiminde WASPAS yöntemi. The Journal of Academic Social Science, 5(47), 368-380. https://ssrn.com/abstract=3043942
• Tian, F. (2016). An agri-food supply chain traceability system for china based on rfıd & blockchain technology 13th International Conference on Service Systems and Service Management (ICSSSM), Kunming, (s. 1-6.) China. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSSSM.2016.7538424
• Trivedi, S. ve Malik, R. (2022). Blockchain technology as an emerging technology in the insurance market. K. Sood, R. K. Dhanaraj, B. Balusamy, S. Grima ve R. Uma Maheshwari (Ed.), Big data: A game changer for insurance industry (emerald studies in finance, insurance, and risk management) içinde (s. 81-100). Emerald Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/978-1-80262-605-620221006
• Tuş, A. ve Aytaç Adalı, E. (2019). The new combination with CRITIC and WASPAS methods for the time and attendance software selection problem. Opsearch, 56, 528-538. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12597-019-00371-6
• Ünal, G. ve Uluyol, Ç. (2020). Blok zinciri teknolojisi. Bilişim Teknolojileri Dergisi, 13(2), 167-175. https://doi.org/10.17671/gazibtd.516990
• Ünsal, E. ve Kocaoğlu, Ö. (2018). Blok zinciri teknolojisi: kullanım alanları, açık noktaları ve gelecek beklentileri. Avrupa Bilim ve Teknoloji Dergisi, 13, 54-64. https://doi.org/10.31590/ejosat.423676
• Wijaya, D. A., Liu, J. K., Suwarsono, D. A. ve Zhang, P. (2017). A new blockchain-based value-added tax system. T. Okamoto, Y. Yu, M. Au ve Y. Li, (Ed.), Provable security içinde (s. 471-486). Springer Yayınevi. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-68637-0_28
• Xie, Y., Zhou, Y., Peng, Y., Dinçer, H., Yüksel, S. ve Xiang, P. A. (2021). An extended pythagorean fuzzy approach to group decision-making with incomplete preferences for analyzing balanced scorecard-based renewable energy ınvestments, IEEE Access, 9, 43020-43035. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3065294
• Yadav, V. S., Singh, A. R., Raut, R. D. ve Govindarajan, U. H. (2020). Blockchain technology adoption barriers in the ındian agricultural supply chain: An integrated approach. resources, Conservation and Recycling, 161, 104877, 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2020.104877
• Yıldızbası, A. ve Üstünyer, P. (2019). Tarımsal gıda tedarik zincirinde blok zincir tasarımı: Türkiye’de hal yasası örneği. Bartın Orman Fakültesi Dergisi, 21(2), 458-465.
• Zavadskas, E. K., Turskis, Z., Antucheviciene, J. ve Zakarevicius, A. (2012). Optimization of weighted aggregated sum product assessment, Electronics and Electrical Engineering, 6(122), 3–6. https://doi.org/10.5755/j01.eee.122.6.1810
• Zhang, W. ve Deng, Y. (2018). Combining conflicting evidence using the dematel method. Soft Computing, 1-10, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-018-3455-8
• Zhao, J. L., Fan, S. ve Yan, J. (2016). Overview of business innovations and research opportunities in blockchain and introduction to the special issue, Financial Innovation, 2(28), 1-7. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40854-016-0049-2
• Zheng, Z., Xie, S., Dai, H. N., Chen, X. ve Wang, H. (2018). Blockchain challenges and opportunities: A survey. Int. J. Web and Grid Services, 14(4), 352-375. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJWGS.2018.095647