Sosyal İzolasyonun Örgütsel Sinizm Üzerindeki Etkisi

Yıl 2017, , 39 - 52, 21.04.2017

Ali Erbaşı , Orhan Zaganjori

https://doi.org/10.18657/yonveek.307490

Cited By: 8

Öz

Bu çalışmanın amacı, sosyal izolasyonun örgütsel sinizm üzerindeki etkisini incelemektir. Bu amaçla Konya ilinde bulunan 5 tarım makineleri üretim işletmesinin 162 çalışanına uygulanan anketlerden elde edilen veriler değerlendirilmiştir. Değerlendirmelerde merkezi eğilim ölçüleri ve tanımlayıcı istatistikler kullanılmış, korelasyon ve regresyon analizleri ve manova testi uygulanmıştır. Araştırmanın bulgularına göre, sosyal izolasyonun örgütsel sinizm üzerinde istatistiksel açıdan anlamlı etkisinin olduğu tespit edilmiştir. Ayrıca sosyal izolasyonun örgütsel sinizm boyutları üzerindeki etkisi incelenmiş, buna göre sosyal izolasyonun üç örgütsel sinizm boyutunu da (duyuşsal, bilişsel ve davranışsal) istatistiksel açıdan anlamlı şekilde etkilediği görülmüştür. Çalışanların sosyal izolasyon düzeylerinin en çok duyuşsal sinizmi etkilediği bulgulanmıştır. Ayrıca sosyal izolasyon düzeyinin bilişsel sinizmi yüksek düzeyde, davranışsal sinizmi ise düşük düzeyde etkilediği sonucuna ulaşılmıştır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Sosyal izolasyon, örgütsel sinizm, duyuşsal sinizm, bilişsel sinizm, davranışsal sinizm

The Effect of Social Isolation on Organizational Cynicism

Öz

The aim of this study is to investigate the effect of social isolation on organizational cynicism. For this purpose, data obtained from questionnaires implemented to 162 employees works in 5 agricultural machinery production private company located in Konya were evaluated. In the evaluation, measures of central tendency and descriptive statistics were used, correlation and regression analysis and manova analysis were performed. The results showed that social isolation has statistically a significant effect on organizational cynicism. Also, the effect of social isolation on organizational cynicism dimensions were investigated. According to the findings, social isolation has statistically significant effect on three dimensions of organizational cynicism (affective, cognitive and behavioral). It has been found to social isolation has most effect on affective cynicism. Also, it has reached the conclusion that social isolation affect cognitive cynicism high level and behavioral cynicism low level.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Social isolation, organizational cynicism, affective cynicism, cognitive cynicism, behavioral cynicism

Kaynakça

• Acar, Aslı B., Dündar, G. (2008). İşyerinde psikolojik yıldırmaya (mobbing) maruz kalma sıklığı ile demografik özellikler arasındaki ilişkinin incelenmesi. İstanbul Üniversitesi İşletme Fakültesi Dergisi, 37 (2), 111-120.
• Akman, G. (2013). Sağlık Çalışanlarının Örgütsel ve Genel Sinizm Düzeylerinin Karşılaştırılması. İstanbul Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Yüksek Lisans Tezi, İstanbul.
• Bachrach, C. (1980). Childlessness and Social Isolation, National Council on Family Relations. Journal of Marriage and Family, 42 (3), 627-637.
• Bartlett, Maurice S. (1950). Tests of Significance in Factor Analysis. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 3 (2), 77-85.
• Bibb, S., Kourdi, J. (2004). Trust Matters: For Organizational and Personal Success. New York-USA: Palgrave Macmillan.
• Brandes, P., Dharwadkar, R. & Dean, J.W. (1999). Does Organizational Cynicism Matter? Employee and Supervisor Perspectives on Work Outcomes. Eastern Academy of Management Proceedings, 150-153.
• Brown, S.J., Learmonth, M.A. & Mackereth, J.C. (2015). Promoting Public Mental Health and Well-Being; Principles into Practice. London: Jessica Kingsley.
• Cacioppo, J., Hawkley, L. & Thisted, R. (2010). Perceived Social Isolation Makes Me Sad: 5-Year Cross-Lagged Analyses of Loneliness and Depressive Symptomatology in the Chicago Health, Aging, and Social Relations Study. Psychology and Aging, 25 (2), 453-463.
• Can, A. (2014). SPSS İle Bilimsel Araştırma Sürecinde Nicel Veri Analizi (3. Baskı), Ankara: Pegem.
• Cappella, N.J., Jamieson, H.K. (1997). Spiral of Cynicism: The Press and the Public Good. UK: Oxford University.
• Clegg, S., Bailey, R.J. (2007). International Encyclopedia of Organization Studies. USA: SAGE.
• Cornwell, E., Waite, L. (2009). Social Disconnectedness, Percived Isolation, and Health among Older Adults. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 50 (1), 31-48.
• Dean, J., Brandes, P. & Dharwadkar, R. (1998). Organizational Cynicism. USA: Academy of Management.
• De Jong Gierveld, J., van Tilburg, T.G. & Dykstra, P.A. (2006). Loneliness and Social Isolation. D. Perlman and A. Vangelisti (Ed.), The Cambridge Handbok of Personal Relationships, Cambridge-UK: Cambridge University.
• Elliott, J. (1999). Social Isolation and Labor Market Insulation: Network and Neighborhood Effects on Less-Educated Urban Workers. The Sociological Quarterly, 40 (2), 199-216.
• Geschwender, J. (1968). Status Inconsistency, Social Isolation, and Individual Unrest. Social Forces, 46 (4), 477-483.
• Graen, B.G., Graen, A.J. (2006). Sharing Network Leadership, A Volume In LMX Leadership: The Series. USA: Information Age.
• Gün, Gül (2016). Otel İşletmelerinde Mobbing ve Örgütsel Sinizm İlişkisi: Bitlis İlinde Bir Çalışma. International Journal of Social Science, 52, 201-219.
• Hawton, A., Green, C., Dickens, A., Richards, S., Taylor, R., Edwards, R., Greaves, C. & Campbell, J. (2011). The Impact of Social Isolation on the Health Status and Health-Related Quality of Life of Older People. Quality of Life Research, 20 (1), 57-67.
• Hortulanus, R., Machielse, A. & Meeuwesen, L. (2006). Social Isolation in Modern Society. Oxon-UK: Routledge.
• Kalaycı, Ş. (2010). SPSS Uygulamalı Çok Değişkenli İstatistik Teknikleri (5. Baskı). Ankara: Asil.
• Karacaoğlu, K., İnce, F. (2012). Brandes, Dharwadkar ve Dean’in (1999) Örgütsel Sinizm Ölçeği Türkçe Formunun Geçerlilik ve Güvenilirlik Çalışması: Kayseri Organize Sanayi Bölgesi Örneği. Business and Economics Research Journal, 3 (3), 77-92.
• Karelina, K., Norman, G., Zhang, N., Morris, J., Peng, H., DeVries, C. & Greenough, W. (2009). Social Isolation Alters Neuroinflammatory Response to Stroke. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 106 (14), 5895-5900.
• Keyes, D. (2006). Seeing Through Cynicism: A Reconsideration of the Power of Suspicion. USA: InterVarsity.
• Kılıç, Z. (2009). İnmeli Hastalarda Santral Ağrı Değerlendirmesi. İstanbul Fizik Tedavi ve Rehabilitasyon Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi 1. Klinik, Uzmanlık Tezi, İstanbul.
• Krings-Ernst, D. (2011). Organizational Structure and the Disciples of the Dog. Organizational Cynicism. Norderstedt-Germany: GRIN Verlag.
• Kökalan, Ö., Anaş, K. (2016). Çalışanların Örgütsel Sinizm Tutumlarının İşe Yabancılaşmaları Üzerine Etkisi: Vakıf Üniversiteleri Üzerine Bir Çalışma. Bilgi Ekonomisi ve Yönetimi Dergisi, XI (II), 97-109.
• Küçükdeveci, A.A., McKenna S.P., Kutlay, Ş., Gürsel, Y., Whalley D. & Arasil, T. (2000). The development and psychometric assessment of the Turkish version of the Nottingham Health Profile. International Journal of Rehabilitation Research, 23 (1), 31-38.
• Laursen, B., Bukowski, M.W., Aunola, K. & Nurmi, J. (2007). Friendship Moderates Prospective Associations bbetween Social Isolation and Adjustment Problems in Young Children. Society for Research in Child Development, Wiley, 1395-1404.
• Leymann H. (1990). Mobbing and psychological terror at workplace. Violence Vict, 5 (2), 119-126.
• Mazella, D. (2007). The Making of Modern Cynicism. USA: University of Virginia. Oxford Dictionary of English (2010). A. Stevenson (Ed.), UK: Oxford University.
• Reeder, L., Reeder, S. (1969). Social Isolation and Illegitimacy, National Council on Family Relations. Journal of Marriage and Family, 31 (3), 451-461.
• Rokach, A. and Wright, S. (2013). Loneliness Updated: Recent Research on Loneliness and How it Affects our Lives, Is it Lonely at the Top? An Empirical Study of Managers’ and Nonmanagers’ Loneliness in Organizations, Oxon-UK: Routledge.
• Rovai, P.A., Baker, D.J. & Ponton, K.M. (2014). Social Science Research Design and Statistics: A Practitioner’s Guide to Research Methods and IBM SPSS. USA: Watertree.
• Tavşancıl, E. (2010). Tutumların Ölçülmesi ve Spss ile Veri Analizi. Ankara: Nobel.
• Tigges, L., Browne, I. & Green, G. (1998). Social Isolation of the Urban Poor: Race, Class, and Neighborhood Effects on Social Resources. The Sociological Quarterly, 39 (1), 53-77.
• Samuel, K., Alkire, S., Hammock, J., Mills, C. & Zavaleta D. (2014). Social Isolation and its Relationship to Multidimensional Poverty. OPHI Working Paper No. 80, UK: University of Oxford.
• Samuel, K. (2015). Age Acceptance: Implications and Opportunities for Emerging Markets. Emerging Markets Symposium, Green Templeton College, UK: University of Oxford.
• Schreier, B. (2009). The Power of Negative Thinking: Cynicism and the History of Modern American Literature. USA: University of Virginia.
• Siegel, B. (1998). The World of the Autistic Child: Understanding and Treating Autistic Spectrum Disorder. UK: Oxford University.
• Uribe, L. (2007). Social Isolation and Sexual Risk Behavior Among Recently Arrived Male Hispanic Migrants in Durham, North Carolina. North Carolina-USA: The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
• Van Erp, S., Verstricht, L. (2008). Longing in a Culture of Cynicism. Austria: LIT Verlag Munster.
• Vice, S. (2011). Cynicism and Morality. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice, 14 (2), 169-184.
• Victor, C, Scambler, S. & Bond, J. (2008). The Social World of Older People: Understanding Loneliness and Social Isolation in Later Life: Growing Older. A. Walker (Ed.), Berkshire-UK: McGraw-Hill.
• Yıldız, K., Akgün, N., Yıldız, S. (2013). İşe Yabancılaşma ile Örgütsel Sinizm Arasındaki İlişki. The Journal of Academic Social Science Studies, 6 (6), 1253-1284.