Bibliometric Analysis of Research on the Accreditation Process in Counselor Education

Öz

This study aimed to present a bibliometric analysis of the scientific studies on the accreditation process in counseling education in the world. Bibliometric analysis is defined as "a method of analysis that quantitatively examines scientific publications to provide insights into the current status, trends, and development of studies within the literature." The dataset comprised 61 studies published between 1981 and 2024, identified through a search using the keywords “accre*” and “counsel*” in the Web of Science (WoS) database on September 13, 2024. VOSviewer 1.6.20 software was used for the analysis. The studies were analyzed based on publication years, types, countries, languages, journals, institutions, citation counts, and keywords. The findings indicated that although publications on the accreditation process in counselor education began in 1980, the overall number of publications was relatively low, except for the periods between 1990-1994 and 2010-2014, which can be expressed as peaks in terms of the number of publications. The most frequently used keyword was “accreditation,” followed by “CACREP” and “counselor education.” Most studies originated from the United States and were published in English. Among the most cited articles, an article from Turkey ranked third. The journal that published the most articles on this subject was Journal of Counseling and Development. In conclusion, this study provides a comprehensive assessment of quantitative trends in the scientific literature on accreditation processes in counselor education. The findings, which highlight the limited number of publications over a span of more than 40 years, were discussed in relation to potential contributing factors. Additionally, recommendations were offered to enhance accreditation processes and foster research in counselor education, particularly in Turkey.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• accreditation
• accreditation
• counselor education
• counselor education
• bibliometric analysis
• bibliometric analysis

Psikolojik Danışman Eğitiminde Akreditasyon Sürecine Yönelik Araştırmaların Bibliyometrik Analizi

Öz

This study aimed to present a bibliometric analysis of the scientific studies on the accreditation process in counseling education in the world. Bibliometric analysis is defined as "a method of analysis that quantitatively examines scientific publications to provide insights into the current status, trends, and development of studies within the literature." The dataset comprised 61 studies published between 1981 and 2024, identified through a search using the keywords “accre*” and “counsel*” in the Web of Science (WoS) database on September 13, 2024. VOSviewer 1.6.20 software was used for the analysis. The studies were analyzed based on publication years, types, countries, languages, journals, institutions, citation counts, and keywords. The findings indicated that although publications on the accreditation process in counselor education began in 1980, the overall number of publications was relatively low, except for the periods between 1990-1994 and 2010-2014, which can be expressed as peaks in terms of the number of publications. The most frequently used keyword was “accreditation,” followed by “CACREP” and “counselor education.” Most studies originated from the United States and were published in English. Among the most cited articles, an article from Turkey ranked third. The journal that published the most articles on this subject was Journal of Counseling and Development. In conclusion, this study provides a comprehensive assessment of quantitative trends in the scientific literature on accreditation processes in counselor education. The findings, which highlight the limited number of publications over a span of more than 40 years, were discussed in relation to potential contributing factors. Additionally, recommendations were offered to enhance accreditation processes and foster research in counselor education, particularly in Turkey.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• accreditation
• accreditation
• accreditation
• accreditation
• counselor education
• counselor education
• counselor education
• counselor education
• bibliometric analysis
• bibliometric analysis
• bibliometric analysis
• bibliometric analysis

Kaynakça

1. Adams, S. A. (2006). Does CACREP Accreditation Make A Difference? A Look at NCE Results and Answers. Journal of Professional Counseling: Practice, Theory & Research, 34(1-2), 60-76. https://doi.org/10.1080/15566382.2006.12033824
2. Aladağ, M., & Kemer, G. (2016). Clinical supervision: An emerging counseling specialty in Turkey. The Clinical Supervisor, 35(2), 175-191. https://doi.org/10.1080/07325223.2016.1223775
3. Aldemir, A., & İlhan, T. (2018). Okul Psikolojik Danışmanlarının Mesleki Algıları Üzerine Bir İnceleme. Turkish Psychological Counseling and Guidance Journal, 8(51), Article 51.
4. Ammon, U. (Ed.). (2001). The Dominance of English as a Language of Science: Effects on Other Languages and Language Communities. DE GRUYTER MOUTON. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110869484
5. Aras Kemer, F. N., Bilgili, H., & Ergene, T. (2019). Türkiye’de Rehberlik ve Psikoojik Danışmanlık Programlarının Akreditasyonu. III. Uluslararası Öğretmen Eğitimi ve Akreditasyon Kongresi, 405-411. https://avesis.hacettepe.edu.tr/yayin/878f7acf-e653-4a5f-a180-65f157a6ec15/turkiyede-rehberlik-ve-psikolojik-danismanlik-programlarinin-akreditasyonu
6. Arruda, H., Silva, E. R., Lessa, M., Proença Jr., D., & Bartholo, R. (2022). VOSviewer and Bibliometrix. Journal of the Medical Library Association, 110(3), 392-395. https://doi.org/10.5195/jmla.2022.1434
7. Arslan, Ü., & Sommers‐Flanagan, J. (2018). The New Stage of the Turkish Counseling System: Explosive Growth (2000 to the Present). Journal of Multicultural Counseling and Development, 46(2), 115-128. https://doi.org/10.1002/jmcd.12096
8. Bilgili, H., Ergene, T., & Aras Kemer, F. (2020). Hacettepe üniversitesi rehberlik ve psikolojik danışmanlık programının akreditasyon süreci: çıkarılan dersler. III. Uluslararası Öğretmen Eğitimi ve Akreditasyon Kongresi, Ankara, Türkiye, 30 Kasım -01 Aralık 2019, ss.419-425

9. Burns, S. T., & Cruikshanks, D. R. (2018). Independently Licensed Counselors’ Connection to CACREP and State Professional Identity Requirements. Professional Counselor, 8(1), 29-45.
10. CACREP. (2009). 2009 CACREP Standards. https://www.cacrep.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/2009-Standards.pdf
11. CACREP. (2016). 2016 CACREP Standards. https://www.cacrep.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/08/2016-Standards-with-citations.pdf
12. CACREP. (2024a). 2024 CACREP Standards. https://www.cacrep.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/2024-Standards-Combined-Version-4.11.2024.pdf
13. CACREP. (2024b, Eylül 30). CACREP-Council for Accreditation of Counseling and Related Educational Programs. CACREP. https://www.cacrep.org/
14. Cimsir, E., & Carney, J. V. (2017). School counsellor training, attitudes, and perceptions of preparedness to provide services to students with disabilities in inclusive schools in Turkey. European Journal of Special Needs Education, 32(3), 346-361. https://doi.org/10.1080/08856257.2016.1240340
15. Clawson, T. W., & Henderson, D. A. (2004). Counselor Preparation: Programs, Faculty, Trends. Psychology Press.
16. Coker, J. K., & Schooley, A. (2009). Investigating the Effectiveness of Clinical Supervision in a CACREP Accredited Online Counseling Program. 2009 ACES Conference. 2009 ACES Conference, San Diego, CA. https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/document? repid=rep1&type=pdf&doi=d18de23a7c86a6060e4a1e69b18f720ad36fd1ee
17. Donthu, N., Kumar, S., Mukherjee, D., Pandey, N., & Lim, W. M. (2021). How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 133, 285-296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.04.070
18. Drubin, D. G., & Kellogg, D. R. (2012). English as the universal language of science: Opportunities and challenges. Molecular Biology of the Cell, 23(8), 1399-1399. https://doi.org/10.1091/mbc.e12-02-0108
19. Ellegaard, O. (2018). The application of bibliometric analysis: Disciplinary and user aspects. Scientometrics, 116(1), 181-202. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-018-2765-z
20. EPDAD. (2024). EPDAD-Öğretmenlik Eğitim Programları Değerlendirme ve Akreditasyon Derneği. https://epdad.org.tr/haber/statu-ve-taninma
21. Fidan, F. K., & Owen, D. W. (2008). School Counselor’s Role and Functions: School Administrators’ and Counselors’ Opinions. Ankara University Journal of Faculty of Educational Sciences (JFES), 41(1), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.1501/Egifak_0000000199
22. Fretz, B. R., & Mills, D. H. (1981). Professional Certification in Counseling Psychology. The Counseling Psychologist, 9(1), 2-17. https://doi.org/10.1177/001100008000900102
23. Gerstein, L. H., Heppner, P. P., Aegisdottir, S., & Leung, S.-M. A. (2011). Essentials of Cross-Cultural Counseling. SAGE Publications.
24. Hardy, K., & Meyer-Griffith, K. (2012). Meeting Accreditation Requirements: Are You Serving Distance Learners? Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 16(5), 7-18.
25. Hohenshil, T. H., Amundson, N. E., & Niles, S. G. (2015). Counseling Around the World: An International Handbook. John Wiley & Sons.
26. Imani, B., Mirezati, S. Z., & Saberi, M. K. (2019). A Bibliometric Analysis of International Journal of Nursing Studies (1963-2018). Library Philosophy and Practice, 1-14.
27. Jung, S. M. (1986). The Role of Accreditation in Directly Improving Educational Quality. Council on Postsecondary Accreditation, One Dupont Circle, NW, Suite 305, Washington, DC. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED267055
28. Kiye, S. (2024). Psikolojik Danışma ve Rehberlik Hizmetleri: Tarihi Gelişimi, Modelleri ve Programı. Gazi Üniversitesi Gazi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 44(1), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.17152/gefad.1372539
29. Korkut, D. D. F., Dr, F. M. Y. D., & Kampusü, O. K. K. (2008). Avrupa Birliği, Bologna Süreci Ve Türkiyede Psikolojik Danışman Eğitimi. Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Yönetimi, 53(53), Article 53.
30. Korkut, F. (2007). Counselor Education, Program Accreditation and Counselor Credentialing in Turkey. International Journal for the Advancement of Counselling, 29(1), 11-20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10447-006-9021-6
31. Körük, S. (2018). Accreditation Practices in Psychological Counseling and Guidance. Journal of Family Counseling and Education, 3(1), 38-44. https://doi.org/10.32568/jfce.413585
32. Körük, S., & Kara, A. (2019). Supervision Models in Psychological Counseling. Eskişehir Osmangazi Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi. https://doi.org/10.17494/ogusbd.548256
33. Köse, A. (2017). School-Based Counseling, Policy, Policy Research, and Implications in Turkey and Other Middle Eastern Countries. Içinde J. C. Carey, B. Harris, S. M. Lee, & O. Aluede (Ed.), International Handbook for Policy Research on School-Based Counseling (ss. 383-398). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-58179-8_25
34. Meara, N. M., Schmidt, L. D., Carrington, C. H., Davis, K. L., Dixon, D. N., Fretz, B. R., Myers, R. A., Ridley, C. R., & Suinn, R. M. (1988). Training and Accreditation in Counseling Psychology. The Counseling Psychologist, 16(3), 366-384. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011000088163005
35. Mongeon, P., & Paul-Hus, A. (2016). The journal coverage of Web of Science and Scopus: A comparative analysis. Scientometrics, 106(1), 213-228. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-015-1765-5
36. NBCC. (2024). NBCC | National Board for Certified Counselors & Affiliates. National Counselor Examination. https://nbcc.org/exams/nce
37. Owen, F. K., & Güneri, O. Y. (2015). Counseling in Turkey. Içinde T. H. Hohenshil, N. E. Amundson, & S. G. Niles (Ed.), Counseling Around the World (1. bs, ss. 293-302). Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119222736.ch31
38. Öztürk, F., & Duran, N. O. (2023). The Mediating Role of the Evaluation Process Within Supervision on the Relationship Between Counseling Self-efficacy and Working Alliance. International Journal for the Advancement of Counselling. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10447-023-09526-z
39. Özyürek, R. (2009). Okullarda Psikolojik Danışma ve Rehberlik Uygulamaları ve Öğrencilere Sağlanan Süpervizyon Olanakları:Ulusal Bir Tarama Çalışması. Turkish Psychological Counseling and Guidance Journal, 4(32), Article 32. https://doi.org/10.17066/pdrd.44114
40. Özyürek, R. (2019). Psikolojik Danışman Eğitimi ve Mesleğin Profesyonel Kimlik Gelişimi için Gereksinim Duyulan Yasa ve Yönetmelik Düzenlemeleri. Turkish Psychological Counseling and Guidance Journal, 9(54), Article 54.
41. Özyürek, R., Topkaya, N., Haktanir, A., Hamamci, Z., Can, A., Duy, B., Akçil, S., & Yilmaz, O. (2021). An Examination of the Opinions of Faculty Members on Critical Accreditation Issues in Counselor Education in Turkey. Türk Psikolojik Danışma ve Rehberlik Dergisi, 11(63), 433-455. https://doi.org/10.17066/tpdrd.1050739
42. Person, M., Garner, C., Ghoston, M., & Petersen, C. (2020). Counselor Professional Identity Development in CACREP and Non-CACREP Accredited Programs. Journal of Counselor Preparation and Supervision, 13(1). http://dx.doi.org/10.7729/131.1335
43. Richards, D., & Viganó, N. (2013). Online Counseling: A Narrative and Critical Review of the Literature. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 69(9), 994-1011. https://doi.org/10.1002/jclp.21974
44. Sakız, H., & Sarıçalı, M. (2019). Paradigmatic Challenges in School Counselling: Correlates and Reflections on Practice. Journal of Psychologists and Counsellors in Schools, 29(1), 69-81. https://doi.org/10.1017/jgc.2018.23
45. Schweiger, W. K., Henderson, D. A., McCaskill, K., Clawson, T. W., & Collins, D. R. (Ed.). (2011). Counselor Preparation: Programs, Faculty, Trends (13. bs). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203848616
46. Shah, S. H. H., Lei, S., Ali, M., Doronin, D., & Hussain, S. T. (2019). Prosumption: Bibliometric analysis using HistCite and VOSviewer. Kybernetes, ahead-of-print(ahead-of-print). https://doi.org/10.1108/K-12-2018-0696
47. Snow, W. H., Lamar, M. R., Hinkle, J. S., & Speciale, M. (2018). Current Practices in Online Counselor Education. Professional Counselor, 8(2), 131-145.
48. Stockton, R., & Güneri, O. Y. (2011). Counseling in Turkey: An Evolving Field. Journal of Counseling & Development, 89(1), 98-104. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1556-6678.2011.tb00065.x
49. Stripling, R. O. (1978). Standards and Accreditation in Counselor Education: A Proposal. The Personnel and Guidance Journal, 56(10), 608-611. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2164-4918.1978.tb05074.x
50. Super, D. E. (1955). Transition: From vocational guidance to counseling psychology. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 2(1), 3-9. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0041630
51. Urofsky, R. I. (2013). The Council for Accreditation of Counseling and Related Educational Programs: Promoting Quality in Counselor Education. Journal of Counseling & Development, 91(1), 6-14. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1556-6676.2013.00065.x
52. Ülker Tümlü, G., & Ceyhan, E. (2021). Structuring Individual Counseling Practicum Supervision: An Action Research. TED EĞİTİM VE BİLİM. https://doi.org/10.15390/EB.2021.9364
53. van Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2017). Citation-based clustering of publications using CitNetExplorer and VOSviewer. Scientometrics, 111(2), 1053-1070. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-017-2300-7
54. Zupic, I., & Čater, T. (2015). Bibliometric Methods in Management and Organization. Organizational Research Methods, 18(3), 429-472. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428114562629