Etkili Okul Öncesi Öğretmenlerinin Kişisel Özellikleri: Kısa Hikaye Çalışması

Öz

Nitelikli bir okul öncesi eğitimin göstergeleri arasında yer alan eğitim programı ve eğitim ortamı gibi temel boyutları en üst düzeyde kullanarak, eğitim sürecini etkili uygulamalarla gerçekleştirecek kişiler okul öncesi öğretmenleridir. Diğer tüm öğretmenlik branşlarında olduğu gibi, okul öncesi öğretmenliğinde de öğretmenlerin taşıması gereken özellikler tartışmaya açık bir konudur. Ancak görüş birliğine varılan konu, öğretmenlerin mesleği seçmelerinde etkili olan geçmiş yaşantılarının, çocuk gelişimi bilgilerinin, inanışlarının ve öz-saygılarının yüksek nitelikteki öğrenme ortamları için önemli olduğu düşüncesidir. Bu doğrultuda bu çalışmanın temel amacı; okul öncesi öğretmenlerinin, etkili okul öncesi öğretmenlerinin kişisel özelliklerine sahip olma durumlarının kısa hikayeler yoluyla incelenmesidir. İkinci amacı ise, okul öncesi öğretmenlerin etkili okul öncesi öğretmeni özelliklerini sergileme düzeyleri arasındaki ilişkinin belirlenmesidir. Araştırmada katılımcıların belirlenmesinde amaçlı örnekleme yöntemi kullanılmış ve 54 öğretmen araştırmaya gönüllü olarak dahil olmuştur. Verilerin toplaması amacıyla, araştırmacılar tarafından kurgulanan çeşitli kısa hikayeleri içeren yarı-yapılandırılmış görüşme formu kullanılmıştır. İlgili kısa hikayeler, Colker’ın (2008) öne sürdüğü 12 farklı öğretmen özelliğini (heves/coşku, sonuna kadar direnme, risk almaya isteklilik, pragmatizm, sabır, esneklik, farklılıklara saygı duyma, yaratıcılık, otantiklik, öğrenmeyi sevme, yüksek enerji ve mizah duygusu) yansıtacak şekilde kurgulanmıştır. Verilerin analizinde bütünsel rubrikten ve korelasyon analizinden yararlanılmıştır. Araştırma sonucunda; katılımcıların çoğunluğunun hevesli/coşkulu olma ve otantik olma özelliklerini sergilemelerinin yeterli düzeyde olduğu; yaratıcı olma özelliğini sergileme konusunda iyileştirilme ihtiyacında oldukları; pragmatist olma ve öğrenmeyi sevme özelliğini sergilemede ise yetersiz düzeyde oldukları görülmüştür. Bununla birlikte, hevesli/coşkulu olma ile pragmatist olma puanları ve yaratıcı olma ile yüksek enerjiye sahip olma puanları arasında negatif yönlü anlamlı bir ilişki; sonuna kadar direnme ile farklılıklara saygı gösterme puanları arasında ise pozitif yönlü anlamlı bir ilişki tespit edilmiştir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Okul öncesi eğitimi,Etkili öğretmen özelliği

Personal Characteristics of Effective Preschool Teachers: A Vignette Study

Öz

Preschool teachers are those who are expected to implement the educational process with effective practices by making utmost use of the basic dimensions such as the educational programme and educational setting, considered to be amongst the determiners of a high-quality preschool education. As in all other teaching specialties, the characteristics that preschool teachers need to possess are also open to debate. Consensus is reached, however, on the view that teachers’ previous experiences influential on their professional choice, their knowledge of child development, their beliefs, and their self-esteem are essential for highquality learning settings. The main purpose of this study is to examine the preschool teachers' personal characteristics of effective pre-school teachers through vignettes. The second aim is to determine the relationship between effective pre-school teacher characteristics. Purposive sampling method was used for the selection of the participants and 54 teachers volunteered to take part in the study. For data collection, a semi-structured interview form composed of various short stories and based on the scenario approach was developed by the researchers. The vignettes were created in a way that reflected the 12 different characteristics of a teacher (passion, perseverance, willingness to take risks, pragmatism, patience, flexibility, respect for diversity, creativity, authenticity, love of learning, high energy, and sense of humour) proposed by Colker (2008). The holistic rubric and correlation analysis were used for the analysis of the data. The study concludes that preschool teachers demonstrate a sufficient degree of flexibility but prove inadequate in terms of love of learning and pragmatism. The findings of this study are expected to shed light on preschool teacher education policies. As a result of the research; that the majority of the participants were enthusiastic and authentic; they need to be improved in terms of being creative; pragmatists and love of learning are inadequate. However, there is a significant negative relationship between being enthusiastic with being a pragmatist and being creative with having a high energy score; a significant positive correlation was found between the perseverance and the appreciation of diversity.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Preschool education,Effective teacher characteristics

Kaynakça

1. Aktan Kerem, E., & Cömert, D. (2006) Siirt ilinde okul öncesi eğitim sorunlarının tespitine yönelik öğretmen görüşlerinin incelenmesi. Milli Eğitim Dergisi, 34(170), 1-16.
2. Angelides, P., & Gibbs, P. (2006). Supporting the continued professional development of teachers through the use of vignettes. Teacher Education Quarterly, 33(4), 111-121.
3. Ay, Ş., & Yurdabakan, İ. (2015). Öğretmen adaylarına göre etkili öğretmen özellikleri ve bu özellikler açısından öz-yeterlik algıları. Mehmet Akif Ersoy Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 1(33), 148-166.
4. Bağ, C., & Ay Çeviker, Ş. (2017). Okul öncesi öğretmenlerinin öğretmen yeterlikleri ve hizmet içi eğitim ihtiyaçları. Abant İzzet Baysal Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 17(1), 289-312.
5. Baum, A. C., & King, M. A. (2006). Creating a climate of self-awareness in early childhood teacher preparation programs. Early Childhood Education Journal, 33(4), 217-222. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10643-005-0050-2.
6. Bean-Mellinger B. (2018). Qualities of a good teacher in early childhood development. Erişim Tarihi: 28.11.2018, https://work.chron.com/qualities-good-teacher-early-childhooddevelopment-8694.html.
7. Boulton, M. J., Hardcastle, K., Down, J., Fowles, J., & Simmonds, J. A. (2014). A comparison of preservice teachers’ responses to cyber versus traditional bullying scenarios: Similarities and differences and implications for practice. Journal of Teacher Education, 65(2), 145-155. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487113511496.
8. Bozkuş, K., & Taştan, M. (2016). Teacher opinions about qualities of effective teaching. Pegem Journal of Education and Instruction, 6(4), 469-490. http://dx.doi.org/10.14527/pegegog.2016.023.

9. Breault, R. A. (2013). “She Was Great, but...": Examining preservice recollections of favorite and most effective teachers. Professional Educator, 37(1), n1.
10. Bryant, J., Comisky, P. W., Crane, J. S., & Zillmann, D. (1980). Relationship between college teachers' use of humor in the classroom and students' evaluations of their teachers. Journal of educational psychology, 72(4), 511-519. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.72.4.511.
11. Burden, P. R. (1980). Teachers ‘perceptions of the characteristics and influences on their personal and professional development. Manhattan, KS: Author. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 198087).
12. Büte, M., & Balcı, A. F. (2010). Bağımsız anaokulu yöneticilerinin bakış açısından okul yönetimi süreçlerinin işleyişi ve sorunlar. Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Yönetimi Dergisi, 16(4), 485-511.
13. Büyüköztürk, Ş., Kılıç Çakmak, E., Akgün, Ö.E., Karadeniz, Ş., & Demirel, F. (2013). Eğitimde Bilimsel Araştırma Yöntemleri (25. baskı). Ankara: Pegem Akademi.
14. Can, N. (2004). Öğretmenlerin geliştirilmesi ve etkili öğretmen davranışları. Erciyes Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 16(1), 103-119.
15. Cartwright, S. (1999). What makes good early childhood teachers?. Young Children, 54(4), 47.
16. Check, J. F. (1986). Positive traits of the effective teacher--negative traits of the ineffective one. Education, 106(3), 326-333.
17. Chingos, M. M., & Peterson, P. E. (2011). It's easier to pick a good teacher than to train one: Familiar and new results on the correlates of teacher effectiveness. Economics of Education Review, 30(3), 449-465. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econedurev.2010.12.010.
18. Christensen, L. B., Johnson, R.B., & Turner, L.A. (2015). Araştırma yöntemleri: Desen ve analiz (A. Aypay, çev. ed.). Ankara: Anı Yayıncılık. Colker, L. J. (2008). Twelve characteristics of effective early childhood teachers. YC Young Children, 63(2), 68-73. Çakmak, M., & Gündüz, M. (2018). Pre-service ELT teachers' perceptions of characteristics of effective teachers. Gazi University Journal of Gazi Educational Faculty (GUJGEF), 38(1), 359-383.
19. Doğan, B., & Tatık, R. Ş. (2014). Okul öncesi öğretmenlerinin hizmet içi eğitim ihtiyaçlarının belirlenmesi. International Journal of Social Science, (27), 521-539.
20. Dinçer, A., Göksu, A., Takkaç, A., & Yazıcı, M. (2013). Common characteristics of an effective english language teacher. Online Submission, 4(3), 1-8.
21. Duckworth, A. L., Quinn, P. D., & Seligman, M. E. (2009). Positive predictors of teacher effectiveness. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 4(6), 540-547. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760903157232.
22. Dunn, R., Beaudry, J. S., & Klavas, A. (2002). Survey of research on learning styles. California Journal of Science Education, 2(2), 75-98.
23. Egyed, C. J., & Short, R. J. (2006). Teacher self-efficacy, burnout, experience and decision to refer a disruptive student. School Psychology International, 27(4), 462-474. https://doi.org/10.1177/0143034306070432.
24. Ellett, C. D., & Teddlie, C. (2003). Teacher evaluation, teacher effectiveness and school effectiveness: Perspectives from the USA. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 17(1), 101-128.
25. Erdiller, Z. B., & Mcmullen, M. B. (2003). Turkish teachers' beliefs about developmentally appropriate practices in early childhood education. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 25(25), 84-93.
26. Evans, S. C., Roberts, M. C., Keeley, J. W., Blossom, J. B., Amaro, C. M., Garcia, A. M., Stough, C. O., Canter, K. S., Robles, R., & Reed, G. M. (2015). Vignette methodologies for studying clinicians’ decision-making: validity, utility, and application in ICD-11 field studies. International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology, 15(2), 160-170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijchp.2014.12.001.
27. Finch, J. (1987). Research Note: The Vignette Technique in Survey Research. Sociology 21(1): 105–114. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038587021001008.
28. Glesne, C. (2012). Nitel araştırmaya giriş. (A. Ersoy, & P. Yalçınoğlu, Çev.) Ankara: Anı Yayıncılık.
29. Gorham, J., & Christophel, D. M. (1990). The relationship of teachers' use of humor in the classroom to immediacy and student learning. Communication education, 39(1), 46-62. https://doi.org/10.1080/03634529009378786. Hegde, A. V., & Cassidy, D. J. (2009). Teachers’ beliefs and practices regarding developmentally appropriate practices: a study conducted in India. Early Child Development and Care, 179(7), 837-847. https://doi.org/10.1080/03004430701536491.
30. Huebner, S. (1991). Bias in special education decisions: The contribution of analogue research, School Psychology Quarterly 6(1): 50–65. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/h0088240.
31. Jeffries, C., & Maeder, D. W. (2005). Using vignettes to build and assess teacher understanding of instructional strategies. Professional Educator, 27, 17-28.
32. Jeffries, C., & Maeder, D. W. (2006). Using instructional and assessment vignettes to promote recall, recognition, and transfer in educational psychology courses. Teaching Educational Psychology, 1 (2), 1-19.
33. Jeffries, C., & Maeder, D. W. (2009). The effect of scaffolded vignette instruction on student mastery of subject matter. The Teacher Educator, 44(1), 21-39. https://doi.org/10.1080/08878730802522262.
34. Jorde-Bloom, P. (1988). Closing the gap: An analysis of teacher and administrator perceptions of organizational climate in the early childhood setting. Teaching and Teacher Education, 4(2), 111-120.
35. Keller, M. M., Goetz, T., Becker, E. S., Morger, V., & Hensley, L. (2014). Feeling and showing: A new conceptualization of dispositional teacher enthusiasm and its relation to students' interest. Learning and Instruction, 33, 29-38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2014.03.001.
36. Korte, L., Lavin, A., & Davies, T. (2013). An investigation into good teaching traits. Journal of Learning in Higher Education, 9(1), 141-150.
37. Külekçi, G. (2018). Identifying the perceptions of prospective English language teachers on characteristics of effective teachers: Who is the ideal teacher?. Novitas-ROYAL (Research on Youth and Language), 12(1), 1-15.
38. Landis, J. R., & Koch, G. G. (1977). The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics, 33(1), 159-174.
39. Leigh, A. (2010). Estimating teacher effectiveness from two-year changes in students’ test scores. Economics of Education Review, 29(3), 480-488. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econedurev.2009.10.010.
40. Liebovich, B., & Adler, S. M. (2009). Teaching advocacy in early years initial teacher education programmes. Forum, 51(1), 25-34.http://dx.doi.org/10.2304/forum.2009.51.1.25. Lindamood, J. B. (1995). Teachers as child advocates: A continuum of involvement. Day Care and Early Education, 22(4), 23-24. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02361374.
41. Liu, S., Liu, C., Stronge, J., & Xu, X. (2016). Teacher characteristics for success in the classroom: Chinese principals’ perceptions for hiring decisions. Asia Pacific Education Review, 17(1), 107-120. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-015-9412-7.
42. Marsh, C. (1982) The Survey Method. London: Allen and Unwin.
43. Miles, M. (1990). New methods for qualitative data collection and analysis: vignettes and prestructured cases. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 3(1), 3751. https://doi.org/10.1080/0951839900030104.
44. Morrison, G. S. (2004). Early childhood education today. Upper Saddle River, N.J.: Merrill/Prentice Hall.
45. Morrow, J. R., Mood, D. P., Disch, J. G., & Kang, M. (2016). Measurement and evaluation in human performance. 5th Edition. Champaign: Human Kinetics. Muijs, D. (2006). Measuring teacher effectiveness: Some methodological reflections. Educational Research and Evaluation, 12(1), 53-74. ttps://doi.org/10.1080/13803610500392236.
46. Orosz, G., Tóth-Király, I., Bőthe, B., Kusztor, A., Kovács, Z. Ü., & Jánvári, M. (2015). Teacher enthusiasm: A potential cure of academic cheating. Frontiers in psychology, 6, 318, 1-12. https:// doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00318.
47. Özdemir, S., Sezgin, F., Kaya, Z., & Recepoğlu, E. (2011). İlköğretim okulu öğretmenlerinin stresle başa çıkma tarzları ile kullandıkları mizah tarzları arasındaki ilişki. Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Yönetimi Dergisi, 17(3), 405-428.
48. Özkan, M., & Arslantaş, H. İ. (2013). Etkili öğretmen özellikleri üzerine sıralama yöntemiyle bir ölçekleme çalışması. Trakya University Journal of Social Science, 15(1), 311-330.
49. Patrick, B. C., Hisley, J., & Kempler, T. (2000). “What's everybody so excited about?”: the effects of teacher enthusiasm on student intrinsic motivation and vitality. The Journal of Experimental Education, 68(3), 217-236. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220970009600093.
50. Rentzou, K., & Sakellariou, M. (2011). Greek pre-service kindergarten teachers’ beliefs about and practices of developmentally appropriate practices in early childhood education. Early Child Development and Care, 181(8), 1047-1061. https://doi.org/10.1080/03004430.2010.509796.
51. Richards, H. V., Brown, A. F., & Forde, T. B. (2007). Addressing diversity in schools: Culturally responsive pedagogy. Teaching Exceptional Children, 39(3), 64-68. Rivkin, S. G., Hanushek, E.A., & Kain, J.F. (2005). Teachers, schools, and academic achievement. Econometrica, 73, 417–458. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.14680262.2005.00584.x.
52. Roegholt, S., Wardekker, W., & Van Oers, B. (1998). Teachers and pluralistic education. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 30(2), 125-141. https://doi.org/10.1080/002202798183666.
53. Sak, R., Tantekin-Erden, F., & Morrison, G. S. (2016). Child-centred education: Preschool teachers’ beliefs and self-reported practices, Early Child Development and Care, 186(8), 1185-1202. https://doi.org/10.1080/03004430.2015.1081185.
54. Sak, R., Tantekin-Erden, F., & Morrison, G. S. (2018). Preschool teachers’ beliefs and practices related to child-centred education in Turkey. Education 3-13, 46(5), 563-577. https://doi.org/10.1080/03004279.2017.1322995.
55. Soto, J. M. (2018). Effect of vignette-based demonstration on preschool teachers' awareness of intentional teaching. Unpublish Doctorate Thesis. Minnesota: Walden University.
56. Stronge, J. H. (2018). Qualities of effective teachers. (3rd Edition). ASCD. Stronge, J. H., Ward, T. J., & Grant, L. W. (2011). What makes good teachers good? A crosscase analysis of the connection between teacher effectiveness and student achievement. Journal of Teacher Education, 62(4), 339-355. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487111404241.
57. Şahin, İ. T. (2013). Preschool teachers‟ beliefs and practices related to developmentally appropriate classroom management. Doctoral dissertation. Ankara: Middle East Technical University.
58. Şahin-Sak, İ. T., Tantekin-Erden, F., & Pollard-Durodola, S. (2018). Turkish preschool teachers’ beliefs and practices related to two dimensions of developmentally appropriate classroom management. Education 3-13, 46(1), 102-116. https://doi.org/10.1080/03004279.2016.1194447.
59. Şen, H. Ş., & Erişen, Y. (2002). Öğretmen yetiştiren kurumlarda öğretim elemanlarının etkili öğretmenlik özellikleri. Gazi Üniversitesi Gazi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 22(1), 99-116.
60. TOÖEGD, Türkiye Okul Öncesi Eğitimini Geliştirme Derneği (2017). “İyi Bir Başlangıç İçin Öğretmen Niteliği” Çalıştayı Hizmetteki Öğretmenin Niteliğini Artırma Çalışma Raporu (18.10.2017).
61. Uşun, S., & Cömert, D. (2003). Okul öncesi öğretmenlerinin hizmet içi eğitim gereksinimlerinin belirlenmesi. G.Ü. Gazi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 23(2), 125-138.
62. Wood, A. M. (1998). The effects of teacher enthusiasm on student motivation, selective attention, and text memory. Dissertation for the degree of Doctorate of Philosophy. The University of Western Ontario. London, Ontario. Department of Psychology.
63. Ziv, A. (1988). Teaching and learning with humor: Experiment and replication. The Journal of Experimental Education, 57(1), 4-15. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220973.1988.10806492.