Van Depremi Sonrası Psikososyal Süreçlerin Sistematik Analizi

Öz

Bu çalışmanın amacı, afetlerin karmaşık etkilerini anlamak ve gelecekteki müdahale politikalarına katkı sağlamaktır. Bu nedenle çalışmada Van depremi sonrasında kişilerin risk algısı, depremin kişiler üzerindeki psikososyal etkileri ve afet yönetim süreci sistematik bir yaklaşımla incelenmiştir. Araştırma, 2011-2024 yılları arasında yayımlanan Van depremini konu alan Türkçe ve İngilizce akademik çalışmalar PRISMA protokolüne uygun bir şekilde taranarak gerçekleştirilmiştir. Çalışmada Van depremiyle ilişkili “Van”, “Deprem”, “Risk”, Psikolojik Etki”, “Sosyal Etki” ve “Afet Yönetimi” anahtar kelimeleri kullanılmıştır. İlk aramada yedi veri tabanında toplam 8.689 makale belirlenmiş, tekrarlananlar çıkarıldıktan sonra 485 çalışmanın tam metinleri incelenmiş ve nihai olarak 15 makale analize dahil edilmiştir. Bulgular, deprem sonrası yoğun duygusal tepkiler, bilişsel bozukluklar ve davranışsal değişiklikler gibi sonuçları ortaya koymuştur. Ayrıca, kadınların erkeklere kıyasla daha yüksek düzeyde travma sonrası stres belirtileri yaşadığı tespit edilmiştir. İncelenen çalışmalarda kurumlar arası koordinasyon eksikliği ve iletişim sorunlarının afet yönetimini olumsuz etkilediği belirlenmiştir. Sonuçlar, önleyici afet yönetimi politikalarının geliştirilmesi ve psikolojik sağlık ve sosyal destek sistemlerinin güçlendirilmesi gerektiğini ortaya koymaktadır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Van Depremi
• Risk
• Risk Algısı
• Psikolojik Etki
• Sosyal Etki
• Afet Yönetimi

Systematic Analysis of Psychosocial Processes After the Van Earthquake

Öz

This study aims to understand the complex effects of disasters and contribute to future intervention policies. Therefore, the study systematically examined people's perception of risk after the Van earthquake, the psychosocial effects of the earthquake on people, and the disaster management process. The research was conducted by scanning Turkish and English academic studies on the Van earthquake published between 2011 and 2024 by the PRISMA protocol. The keywords "Van," "Earthquake," "Risk," Psychological Impact," "Social Impact," and "Disaster Management" related to the Van earthquake were used in the study. In the initial search, 8,689 articles were identified in seven databases; after removing duplicates, the full texts of 485 studies were examined, and finally, 15 articles were included in the analysis. The findings revealed intense emotional reactions, cognitive disorders, and behavioral changes after the earthquake. In addition, it was determined that women experienced higher levels of post-traumatic stress symptoms compared to men. The studies determined poor coordination and communication between institutions negatively affected disaster management. The results reveal that preventive disaster management policies should be developed, and psychological health and social support systems should be strengthened.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Van Earthquake
• Risk
• Risk Perception
• Psychological Impact
• Social Impact
• Disaster Management

Kaynakça

1. AFAD. (2012). 2011 Van Depremi raporu. Afet ve Acil Durum Yönetimi Başkanlığı.
2. Albulescu, A. C., Larion, D., & Grozavu, A. (2021). Seismic risk perception and seismic adjustments in Vaslui City, Romania. Natural Hazards Review, 22(2). https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)NH.1527-6996.0000453.
3. Aldrich, D. P., & Meyer, M. A. (2015). Social capital and community resilience. American behavioral scientist, 59(2), 254-269. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764214550299.
4. Alkan, H., Toker, M., & Akkaya, İ. (2023). Van gölü havzası ve civarının depremselliğine genel bir bakış. Yüzüncü Yıl Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Dergisi, 28(1), 317-333.
5. Amiri, H., & Jahanitabesh, A. (2023). Psychological reactions after disasters. In M. Mokhtari (Ed.), Natural hazards - New insights (Chapter 22). IntechOpen. https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.109007
6. Ao, Y., Zhang, H., Yang, L., Wang, Y., Martek, I., & Wang, G. (2021). Impacts of earthquake knowledge and risk perception on earthquake preparedness of rural residents. Natural Hazards, 107, 1287-1310. Htpps://doi.org./10.1007/s11069-021-04632-w
7. Bakic, H., & Ajdukovic, D. (2021). Resilience after natural disasters: the process of harnessing resources in communities differentially exposed to a flood. European Journal of Psychotraumatology, 12(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/20008198.2021.1891733
8. Bly, J., Francescutti, L. H., & Weiss, D. (2020). Disaster management: A state-of-the-art review. IntechOpen eBooks. https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.94489

9. Boztaş, M. H., Aker, A. T., Munir, K., Karasu, U., Çelik, F., Aydın, A., & Mutlu, E. A. (2019). Post traumatic stress disorder among adults in the aftermath of 2011 Van-Ercis earthquake in Turkey. Turkısh Journal of Clinical Psychiatry, 22(4) DOI: 10.5505/kpd.2019.62534
10. Budirahayu, T., Farida, A., & Amala S, S. M. (2018). Women’s resilience in preserving family life following an earthquake in North Lombok regency, West Nusa Tenggara, Indonesia. Journal of International Women's Studies, 20(9), 107-120.
11. Burger, A., Oz, T., Kennedy, W. G., & Crooks, A. T. (2019). Computational social science of disasters: Opportunities and challenges. Future Internet, 11(5), 103. https://doi.org/10.3390/fi11050103
12. Cadamuro, A., Birtel, M. D., Di Bernardo, G. A., Crapolicchio, E., Vezzali, L., & Drury, J. (2021). Resilience in children in the aftermath of disasters: A systematic review and a new perspective on individual, interpersonal, group, and intergroup level factors. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 31(3), 259-275. https://doi.org/10.1002/casp.2500
13. Comtesse, H., Ertl, V., Hengst, S. M. C., Rosner, R., & Smid, G. E. (2021). Ecological grief as a response to environmental change: A mental health risk or functional response? International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(2), 734. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18020734
14. Dağlı, S. Ç., Çokluk, S. T., Sert, A., & Yüksel, A. (2018). Van depremini yaşayan tıp fakültesi öğrencileri üzerinde depremin uzun dönem etkileri. Van Tıp Dergisi. 25(3), 296-301. DOI: 10.5505/vtd.2018.58076
15. Doğulu, C., Karanci, A. N., & Ikizer, G. (2016). How do survivors perceive community resilience? The case of the 2011 earthquakes in Van, Turkey. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 16, 108–114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2016.02.006
16. Eray, Ş., Uçar, H. N., & Murat, D. (2017). The effects of relocation and social support on long-term outcomes of adolescents following a major earthquake: A controlled study from Turkey. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 24, 46–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2017.05.026
17. Fauzi, M. A., Pradhan, B., Sapuan, N. M., & Kusumastuti, R. D. (2024). The application of knowledge management in disaster management: past, present and future trends. Journal of Knowledge Management, 28(4), 1141-1163.
18. Gough, D., Oliver, S., & Thomas, J. (2017). Introducing systematic reviews. In D. Gough, S. Oliver, & J. Thomas (Eds.), An introduction to systematic reviews (pp. 1–16). Sage Publications.
19. Grover, H., Lindell, M. K., Brody, S. D., & Highfield, W. E. (2022). Correlates of flood hazard adjustment adoption in four coastal communities. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 68(2). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2021.102728.
20. Gündüz, F. (2024). A phenomenological study on women’s disaster experience in Türkiye. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2023.104196
21. Güner, S. I., & Özdemir, N. (2018). Perceived social support levels among university students following the 2011 earthquake in Van, Turkey. Journal of the Pakistan Medical Association, 68(7), 1019–1023.
22. Haddadi, M., Hasani, S. A., & Masoumi, G. (2010). Disaster management. Injury Prevention, 16(Suppl 1), A165-A165.. https://doi.org/10.1136/ip.2010.029215.589
23. Irmak, T., Doğan, B., & Karakas, A. (2012). Source mechanism of the 23 October, 2011, Van (Turkey) earthquake (Mw = 7.1) and aftershocks with its tectonic implications. Earth, Planets and Space, 64, 991-1003. https://doi.org/10.5047/eps.2012.05.002
24. Ikizer, G., Karanci, A., & Dogulu, C. (2016). How does impact of objective and subjective disaster exposure relate to the three clusters of posttraumatic stress symptoms? Anadolu Psikiyatri Dergisi-Anatolian Journal of Psychiatry, 17(3), 209–213. https://doi.org/10.5455/apd.201001
25. Kadak, M. T., Nasıroğlu, S., Boysan, M., & Aydın, A. (2013). Risk factors predicting posttraumatic stress reactions in adolescents after 2011 Van earthquake. Comprehensive Psychiatry, 54(7), 982–990. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comppsych.2013.04.003
26. Lasserson, T., Higgins, J., & Chandler, J. (2019). Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions (Version 6.3). Cochrane. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119536604
27. Makwana, N. (2019). Disaster and its impact on mental health: A narrative review. Journal of family medicine and primary care, 8(10), 3090-3095. doi: 10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_893_19
28. Moher, D., Shamseer, L., Clarke, M., Ghersi, D., Liberati, A., Petticrew, M., Shekelle, P., Stewart, L. A., & PRISMA-P Group. (2015). Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement. Systematic Reviews, 4(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097
29. Moreno, S. D., Arias, R. G., & Pérez-Gañán, R. (2022). Women and children first? An analysis of gender roles in the rescue of people following the 2011 Lorca earthquake. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 73.
30. Mutlu, Ş., & Koşan, Y. (2024). Counselors’ assessment of psycho-social work in post-earthquake disaster zones: Kahramanmaraş, Türkiye. Current Psychology: A Journal for Diverse Perspectives on Diverse Psychological Issues, 43. 31955–31968. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-024-06673-3
31. Norris, F. H., Friedman, M. J., Watson, P. J., Byrne, C. M., Diaz, E., & Kaniasty, K. (2002). 60,000 disaster victims speak: Part I. An empirical review of the empirical literature, 1981—2001. Psychiatry, 65(3), 207-239.
32. Norris, F.H., & Wind, L.H. (2010). The experience of disaster: Trauma, loss, adversities, and community effects. In Y. Neria, S. Galea, & F.H. Norris (Eds.), Mental health and disasters (pp. 29–44). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511730030.003
33. Ocak, T., Duran, A., Ozdes, T., Hocagil, C., & Kucukbayrak, A. (2013). Problems encountered by volunteers assisting the relief efforts in Van, Turkey and the surrounding earthquake area. Journal of Academic Emergency Medicine, 12(2), 66–70. https://doi.org/10.5152/jaem.2013.029
34. Osofsky, J. D., & Osofsky, H. J. (2018). Challenges in building child and family resilience after disasters. Journal of Family Social Work, 21(2), 115-128.
35. Quarantelli, E. L. (1988). Disaster crisis management: A summary of research findings. Journal of management studies, 25(4), 373-385. https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1467-6486.1988.TB00043.X
36. Pfefferbaum, B., Nitiéma, P., & Newman, E. (2019). A meta-analysis of intervention effects on depression and/or anxiety in youth exposed to political violence or natural disasters. Child & Youth Care Forum, 48, 449-477.
37. Platt, S., & Drinkwater, B. D. (2016). Post-earthquake decision making in Turkey: Studies of Van and İzmir. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 17, 220–237. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2016.03.010
38. Salameh, J. P., Bossuyt, P. M., McGrath, T. A., Thombs, B. D., Hyde, C. J., Macaskill, P., ... & McInnes, M. D. (2020). Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy studies (PRISMA-DTA): Explanation, elaboration, and checklist. BMJ: British Medical Journal (Online), 370, m2632. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2020.07.012
39. Salcioğlu, E., Ozden, S., & Ari, F. (2018). The role of relocation patterns and psychosocial stressors in posttraumatic stress disorder and depression among earthquake survivors. The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 206(1), 19–26. https://doi.org/10.1097/NMD.0000000000000627
40. Sevimli, S., Karadas, S., & Dulger, A. C. (2016). Issues affecting health professionals during and after catastrophic earthquakes in Van-Turkey. Journal of the Pakistan Medical Association, 66(2), 129–134.
41. Sezer, L. İ. (2010). Van yöresinin depremselliği, Ege Coğrafya Dergisi, 19(1), 67-84
42. Sinha, A., Kumar, P., Rana, N. P., Islam, R., & Dwivedi, Y. K. (2019). Impact of internet of things (IoT) in disaster management: a task-technology fit perspective. Annals of Operations Research, 283, 759-794. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10479-017-2658-1
43. Sjoberg, S. (2000). Factors in risk perception. Risk analysis: an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis, 20(1), 1-11.
44. Slovic, P., & Peters, E. (2006). Risk perception and affect. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 15, 322-325. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8721.2006.00461.x
45. Steil, A., Dias, N., Lopes, F., Da Silva, M., Bousfield, A., & De Luca Canto, G. (2022). Reporting characteristics of systematic reviews in Psychology: A scoping review. Journal of Health Psychology, 27, 2964–2981. https://doi.org/10.1177/13591053221074592
46. Stewart, J., Swartz, L., & Ward, C. (2012). The personal politics of disaster: Narratives of survıvors of a South African Shanty Town Fire. Journal of Community Psychology, 40(4), 422–437. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcop.20522
47. Şeker, B. D. (2016). Evaluation of life satisfaction after the 2011 Van (Turkey) earthquake. Social Behavior and Personality an International Journal, 44(9), 1409–1417. https://doi.org/10.2224/sbp.2016.44.9.1409
48. Şeker, B. D., & Akman, E. (2014). Van depremi sonrası duygusal, bilişsel ve davranışsal tepkiler: Polis örneklemi incelemesi. Uludağ Üniversitesi Fen Edebiyat Fakültesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 27(27), 215–215. https://doi.org/10.21550/sosbilder.269510
49. Şenyüz, S., Çakıcı, E., & Ergün, D. (2021). The effect of traumatic loss on posttraumatic growth among 2011 Van earthquake survivors: The mediating role of posttraumatic stress. Alpha Psychiatry, 22(2), 79. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9590632/pdf/ap-22-2-79.pdf
50. Taylor-Gooby, P., & Zinn, J. O. (2006). Current directions in risk Research: New developments in Psychology and Sociology. Risk Analysis, 26(2), 397–411. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.2006.00746.x
51. Tripathi, A. (2016). Disasters and disaster management. Anusandhaan- Vigyaan Shodh Patrika, 4(1). https://doi.org/10.22445/avsp.v4i1.4401
52. Uğur, A., & Işik, M. (2020). Türkiye’nin afetlere hazırlık politikalarının toplum algısı üzerinden karşılaştırmalı analizi: Van-Bitlis illeri örneği. Doğal Afetler ve Çevre Dergisi, 6(1), 98–118. https://doi.org/10.21324/dacd.542528
53. Vega-Muñoz, A., Gil-Marín, M., Contreras-Barraza, N., Salazar-Sepúlveda, G., & Losada, A. V. (2022). How to measure organic fruit consumer behavior: A systematic review. Horticulturae, 8(4), 318. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae8040318
54. Yaman, Ö. M., & Akyurt, M. A. (2013). Sosyal hizmete kültürel yaklaşım: 2011 Van depremi örneği. İstanbul University Journal of Sociology, 3(26), 105-144.
55. Yildiz, A., Teeuw, R., Dickinson, J., & Roberts, J. (2020). Children’s earthquake preparedness and risk perception: A comparative study of two cities in Turkey, using a modified PRISM approach. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 49, 101666. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2020.101666
56. Yoosefi Lebni, J., Khorami, F., Ebadi Fard Azar, F., Khosravi, B., Safari, H., & Ziapour, A. (2020). Experiences of rural women with damages resulting from an earthquake in Iran: a qualitative study. BMC public health, 20, 1-13.
57. Yumbul, C., Wieling, E., & Celik, H. (2017). Mother–Child relationships following a disaster: The experiences of Turkish mothers living in a container city after the 2011 Van earthquake. Contemporary Family Therapy, 40(3), 237–248. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10591-017-9445-7
58. Wang, S., Zhang, Y., Ding, W., Meng, Y., Hu, H., Liu, Z., Zeng, X., & Wang, M. (2020). Psychological distress and sleep problems when people are under interpersonal isolation during an epidemic: A nationwide multicenter cross-sectional study. European Psychiatry, 63(1). https://doi.org/10.1192/j.eurpsy.2020.78
59. Wilson, R. S., Zwickle, A., & Walpole, H. (2019). Developing a broadly applicable measure of risk perception. Risk Analysis, 39(4), 777-791. https://doi.org/10.1111/risa.13207.