Aşırı Özgüven, Sessiz Ekipler ve Kaybolan Fikirler: Dunning–Kruger Etkisi Örgütlerde İnovasyonu Nasıl Zayıflatır?

Öz

Örgütlerin yenilikçi performansı yalnızca teknik bilgi ve maddi kaynaklara değil, bireylerin kendi yetkinliklerini doğru değerlendirebilme kapasitesine ve örgüt içi öğrenme iklimine de bağlıdır. Ancak yöneticiler ve çalışanlar, bilişsel önyargılar nedeniyle karar alma ve öğrenme süreçlerinde sistematik hatalar yapabilmektedir. Bu çalışmada, düşük yetkinliğe sahip bireylerin kendi bilgi ve becerilerini aşırı değerlendirmeleriyle tanımlanan Dunning–Kruger etkisinin, örgütlerin inovasyon potansiyelini hangi mekanizmalar aracılığıyla sınırladığı kavramsal bir çerçevede ele alınmaktadır. Literatür taramasına dayalı olarak geliştirilen modelde, Dunning–Kruger etkisinin psikolojik güveni olumsuz yönde etkilediği; psikolojik güvenin ise bir aracı (mediatör) değişken olarak örgütsel öğrenme, fikir paylaşımı ve yenilik kapasitesini şekillendirdiği öne sürülmektedir. Liderlik tarzı, metabilişsel eğitimler ve örgütsel öğrenme yapıları ise bu temel ilişkinin gücünü artırıp azaltabilen düzenleyici (moderatör) değişkenler olarak konumlandırılmaktadır. Çalışma, mevcut bilişsel yanlılık literatüründe genellikle bireysel performans veya eğitim bağlamında incelenen Dunning–Kruger etkisini, örgütsel inovasyon süreçleriyle sistematik biçimde ilişkilendiren bütüncül bir kuramsal model ortaya koyarak özgün bir sentez sunmaktadır. Ampirik bir test sunmamakla birlikte, gelecekte yapılacak araştırmalar için sınanabilir kavramsal önermeler ve metodolojik bir yol haritası önerilmektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Dunning–Kruger Etkisi
• Bilişsel Önyargılar
• Örgütsel İnovasyon
• Psikolojik Güven
• Örgütsel Öğrenme.

Overconfidence, Silent Teams, and Lost Ideas: How the Dunning–Kruger Effect Undermines Innovation in Organizations

Öz

Organizational innovation performance depends not only on technical expertise and material resources, but also on individuals' ability to accurately assess their own competencies and on the organization's learning climate. Cognitive biases, however, systematically distort decision-making and learning processes within organizations. This study conceptually examines how the Dunning–Kruger effect defined as the tendency of low-competence individuals to overestimate their own abilities constrains organizational innovation through multiple cognitive and social mechanisms. Based on an integrative review of the literature, the proposed framework argues that the Dunning–Kruger effect negatively affects psychological safety, which in turn functions as a mediating variable shaping organizational learning, idea sharing, and innovation capacity. Leadership style, metacognitive training, and organizational learning structures are positioned as moderating variables that regulate the strength of these relationships. The study offers a novel theoretical synthesis by systematically linking the Dunning–Kruger effect ordinarily examined in individual performance or training contexts to organizational innovation processes through a multi-level conceptual model. Rather than offering an empirical test, the paper advances theory-driven propositions and outlines a methodological roadmap for future empirical investigation.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Dunning–Kruger effect
• cognitive biases
• organizational innovation
• psychological safety
• organizational learning

Kaynakça

1. Amabile, T. M. (1998). How to kill creativity. Harvard Business Review, 76(5), 76–87. https://doi.org/10.1225/98601
2. Anderson, N., Potočnik, K., & Zhou, J. (2014). Innovation and creativity in organizations: A state-of-the-science review. Journal of Management, 40(5), 1297–1333. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206314527128
3. Avolio, B. J., & Gardner, W. L. (2005). Authentic leadership development: Getting to the root of positive forms of leadership. The Leadership Quarterly, 16(3), 315–338. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2005.03.001
4. Balarezo, G., Foss, N., & Nielsen, B. (2024). Organizational repairs: Managing cognitive barriers to learning and change. Academy of Management Annals, 18(1), 1–54. https://doi.org/10.5465/annals.2021.0006
5. Balzan, R., Mattiske, J., Adele, K., Galletly, C., Chapman, C., Ivleva, E., ... & Rossell, S. (2019). Single-module training reduces cognitive biases in early psychosis. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 62, 16–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbtep.2018.08.003
6. Baron, R. A. (2004). The cognitive perspective: A valuable tool for answering entrepreneurship’s basic “why” questions. Journal of Business Venturing, 19(2), 221–239. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0883-9026(03)00008-9
7. Detert, J. R., & Edmondson, A. C. (2011). Implicit voice theories: Taken-for-granted rules of self-censorship at work. Academy of Management Journal, 54(3), 461–488. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2011.61967701
8. Diamond, A. (2013). Executive functions. Annual Review of Psychology 64, 135–168. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-113011-143750

9. Dunning, D., Heath, C., & Suls, J. (2004). Flawed self-assessment. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 5(3), 69–106. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1529-1006.2004.00018.x
10. Dunning, D. (2011). The Dunning–Kruger effect: On being ignorant of one's own ignorance. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 44, 247–296. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-385522-0.00005-6
11. Dunning, D., Johnson, K., Ehrlinger, J., & Kruger, J. (2003). Why people fail to recognize their own incompetence. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 12(3), 83–87. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8721.01235
12. Edmondson, A. (1999). Psychological safety and learning behavior in work teams. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44(2), 350–383. https://doi.org/10.2307/2666999
13. Ehrlinger, J., Johnson, K., Banner, M., Dunning, D., & Kruger, J. (2008). Why the unskilled are unaware: Further explorations of (absent) self-insight among the incompetent. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94(1), 112–130. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.94.1.112
14. Evans, J. St. B. T., & Stanovich, K. E. (2013). Dual-process theories of higher cognition: Advancing the debate. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 8(3), 223–241. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691612460685
15. Frith, C. D. (2012). The role of metacognition in human social interactions. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 367, 2213–2223. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2012.0123
16. Gibbs, J. L., Rozaidi, N. A., & Eisenberg, J. (2017). Overconfidence and communication failures. Information Systems Research, 28(3), 614–636. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.2017.0703
17. Heavey, C., Simsek, Z., Kyriakopoulos, K., & Ranganathan, R. (2021). Managerial confidence, strategic decisions, and performance. Strategic Management Journal, 42(6), 1123–1148. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.3259
18. Hodgkinson, G. P., & Healey, M. (2011). Psychological foundations of dynamic capabilities: Reflexion and reflection in strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 32(13), 1500–1516. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.964
19. Kämmer, J. E., Bejjani, M., Brugger, P., Butterworth, B., & Derex, M. (2023). Advice taking and decision accuracy. Cognition, 232, 105335. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2022.105335
20. Katila, R., Thatchenkery, S., Christensen, C. M., & Zenios, S. (2017). Problem-solving strategies and innovation. Academy of Management Review, 42(2), 327–348. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2014.0248
21. Kruger, J., & Dunning, D. (1999). Unskilled and unaware of it: How difficulties in recognizing one's own incompetence lead to inflated self-assessments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77(6), 1121–1134. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.77.6.1121
22. Leach, F. (2021). Overconfidence and workplace dynamics: Revisiting the Dunning–Kruger effect. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 42(5), 721–735. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.2516
23. Lebuda, I., Benedek, M., Kamińska, O., & Karwowski, M. (2024). Creativity and the Dunning–Kruger effect: A reassessment. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 18(1), 12–25. https://doi.org/10.1037/aca0000478
24. Miyake, A., Friedman, N. P., Emerson, M. J., Witzki, A. H., Howerter, A., & Wager, T. D. (2000). The unity and diversity of executive functions and their contributions to complex “frontal lobe” tasks: A latent variable analysis. Cognitive Psychology, 41(1), 49–100. https://doi.org/10.1006/cogp.1999.0734
25. Morewedge, C. K., Yoon, H., Scopelliti, I., Symborski, C., Korris, J., & Kassam, K. S. (2015). Debiasing decisions. Psychological Science, 26(2), 226–242. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797614573959
26. Morrison, E. W., & Milliken, F. J. (2000). Organizational silence: A barrier to change and development in a pluralistic world. Academy of Management Review, 25(4), 706–725. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2000.3707697
27. Mueller-Saegebrecht, J. (2021). Cognitive biases in business model innovation. Long Range Planning, 54(4), 102043. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2021.102043
28. Nonaka, I., & Takeuchi, H. (1995). The knowledge-creating company: How Japanese companies create the dynamics of innovation. Oxford University Press.
29. Parviainen, J., & Lahikainen, A. R. (2021). Epistemic humility in innovation leadership. Technology Innovation Management Review, 11(6), 5–17. https://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1444
30. Patent, K. (2022). Trust and distrust as cognitive evaluations. Journal of Trust Research, 12(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/21515581.2022.2048453
31. Russell, B. (1951). New hopes for a changing world. Allen & Unwin.
32. Simon, M., Houghton, S. M., & Aquino, K. (2003). Cognitive biases, risk perception, and venture formation: How individuals decide to start companies. Journal of Business Venturing, 18(3), 419–441. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0883-9026(02)00073-X
33. Sheldon, O., Dunning, D., & Ames, D. R. (2014). Emotionally unskilled, unaware, and uninterested. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 106(6), 1091–1110. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0036163
34. Staub, S., & Kaynak, R. (2019). Dunning–Kruger effect in organizations: A field study. International Journal of Managerial Studies and Research, 7(6), 1–9.
35. Tang, K. Y. (2020). Cognitive bias and managerial decision-making: A review. Management Decision, 58(5), 1043–1063. https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-11-2018-1225
36. Toet, A., Brouwer, A. M., & Van Erp, J. B. (2016). The role of cognitive bias in decision-making. Ergonomics, 59(8), 1141–1150. https://doi.org/10.1080/00140139.2015.1098061
37. Yang, H., Tian, X., & Gong, Y. (2021). Self-perceived creativity and overconfidence. Creativity Research Journal, 33(3), 234–249. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2021.1906657