The Effect of Learner-Centered Methods Recommended in the English Language Curriculum on Academic Achievement: A Meta-analysis Study

Abstract

This study examines the impact of learner-centered methods proposed in the English curriculum on learners' academic achievement in foreign language learning using the meta-analysis method. A literature review was conducted based on inclusion and exclusion criteria, and a total of 234 individual studies and 260 effect sizes obtained from these studies were analyzed. To test publication bias in the study, both the funnel plot and the forest plot were visually interpreted, and statistical tests such as Rosenthal Classic Fail-safe N, Orwin fail-safe N, and Duval and Tweedie Crop Fill methods were conducted. As a result, no publication bias was detected. The analyses were conducted using the random effects model, revealing that learner-centered methods in foreign language teaching have a wide effect (g=0.951, 95% CI [0.852-1.049], p<0.000) on learners' academic achievement. In the study, publication year, research location, publication type, applied method, language skills, teaching level, whether English is the official language in the research location, duration of application, and sample size were identified as moderators for academic success. It was discovered that publication year, publication type, language skills, teaching level, whether English is an official language or not, application period, and sample size are important variables that differentiate the effect sizes.

Keywords

• English curriculum
• Learner-centered methods
• academic achievement
• meta-analysis

İngilizce Öğretim Programında Önerilen Öğrenen Merkezli Yöntemlerin Akademik Başarıya Etkisi: Bir Meta-analiz Çalışması

Öz

Bu çalışmada, İngilizce öğretim programında öngörülen öğrenen merkezli yöntemlerin yabancı dil öğrenmede öğrenenlerin akademik başarılarına etkisini meta-analiz yöntemiyle incelemek amaçlanmıştır. Belirlenen dâhil edilme ve hariç tutulma kriterlerine göre alanyazın taraması yapılmış olup toplam 234 bireysel çalışma ve bu çalışmalardan elde edilen 260 etki büyüklüğü analize tabi tutulmuştur. Çalışmada yayım yanlılığının test edilmesinde huni grafiği ve orman grafiği, Rosenthal Classic fail-safe N, Orwin fail-safe N ve Duval ve Tweedie Kırp Doldur yöntemleriyle hem görsel olarak yorumlanmış hem de istatistiksel olarak test edilmiştir. Sonuç olarak yayım yanlılığı olmadığı tespit edilmiştir. Araştırma sonucunda, Rastgele etkiler modeli kullanılarak analizler gerçekleştirilmiş olup yabancı dil öğretiminde öğrenen merkezli yöntemlerin öğrenenlerin akademik başarıları üzerinde geniş bir etkiye (g=0.951, %95 GA [0.852-1.049], p<0.000) sahip olduğu ortaya çıkmıştır. Çalışmada akademik başarı için yayım yılı, araştırmanın yürütüldüğü yer, yayım türü, uygulanan yöntem, dil beceri alanı, öğretim kademesi, İngilizcenin çalışmanın yürütüldüğü yerde resmi dil olup olmaması, uygulama süresi ve örneklem büyüklüğü moderatör olarak belirlenmiştir. Etki büyüklüklerini farklılaştırmada yayım yılı, yayım türü, dil beceri alanı, öğretim kademesi, İngilizcenin resmi dil olup/olmama durumu, uygulama süresi ve örneklem büyüklüğünün önemli birer değişken olduğu görülmüştür.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• İngilizce öğretim programı
• Öğrenen merkezli yöntemler
• akademik başarı
• meta-analiz

Kaynakça

1. Abraham, A. P. (2018). Play on: Teaching drama in an EFL class. Bulletin of Advanced English Studies, 1 (2), 138-149. https://doi.org/10.31559/baes2018.1.2.2
2. Akçin Ceviz, Ş.N. (2021). Lise 3 İngilizce dersinde işbirlikli öğrenmenin öğrencilerin eleştirel ve yansıtıcı düşünme becerileri ile derse ilişkin tutumlarına etkisi (Tez No.670885). [Yüksek Lisans Tezi, İnönü Üniversitesi]. YÖK Ulusal Tez Merkezi.
3. Alkan, İ., ve Bayri, N. (2017). Fen öğrenmeye yönelik motivasyon ile Fen başarısı arasındaki ilişki üzerine bir meta analiz çalışması. Dicle Üniversitesi Ziya Gökalp Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 32, 865-874 http://dx.doi.org/10.14582/DUZGEF.1853
4. Alkış Küçükaydın, M. (2019). The effect of concept cartoons used in science education to achievement: Meta-analysis study. Inonu University Journal of the Faculty of Education, 20 (1), 220-233. https://doi.org/10.17679/inuefd.434352
5. Arık, S. (2017). Yapılandırmacı öğrenme yaklaşımı ve aktif öğrenmenin çevre eğitimi üzerindeki etkisinin sistematik incelenmesi ve meta-analizi (Tez No. 485863). [Doktora Tezi, Gazi Üniversitesi ]. YÖK Ulusal Tez Merkezi.
6. Avcı, Ş.K. (2018). Üç boyutlu sanal ortamlar ve artırılmış gerçeklik uygulamalarının öğrenme başarısı üzerindeki etkisi: Bir meta-analiz çalışması (Tez No.493087). [Doktora Tezi, Necmettin Erbakan Üniversitesi]. YÖK Ulusal Tez Merkezi.
7. Ayaz, M.F., ve Söylemez, M. (2016). Proje tabanlı öğrenmenin öğrencilerin Fen derslerine yönelik tutumlarına etkisi: Bir meta-analiz çalışması. Adıyaman Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi, 6(1), 112-137 http://dx.doi.org/ 10.17984/adyuebd.20414
8. Ayaz, F. (2016). Öğretim materyali kullanımının öğrencilerin derslere yönelik tutumlarına etkisi: Bir meta-analiz çalışması. Ondokus Mayıs Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 35(1), 141-158. https://doi.org/10.7822/omuefd.35.1.11

9. Bakioğlu, A., & Özcan, Ş. (2016). Meta analiz. Nobel Akademik Yayıncılık.
10. Balemen, N., & Özer Keskin, M. (2018). The effectiveness of Project-Based Learning on science education: A meta-analysis search. International Online Journal of Education and Teaching, 5(4), 849-865. http://iojet.org/index.php/IOJET/article/view/452/297
11. Balta, N., & Sarac, H. (2016). The effect of 7E learning cycle on learning in Science Teaching: A meta-analysis study. European Journal of Educational Research, 5(2), 61-72. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.5.2.61
12. Başar, T., Aşkın Tekkol, İ., ve Gelbal, S. (2016). Tam öğrenme yaklaşımının öğrencilerin akademik başarıları üzerindeki etkisi. Bir meta-analiz çalışması. Eğitimde ve Psikolojide Ölçme ve Değerlendirme Dergisi, 7 (2), 355-371 https://doi.org/10.21031/epod.277891.
13. Batdı, V., ve Candan, F. (2022). Yabancı dil öğretiminde e-öğrenme uygulamalarının kullanılmasına ilişkin bir karma-meta yöntemi. Uluslararası Türkçe Edebiyat Kültür Eğitim Dergisi, 11(2), 889-904. http://dx.doi.org/10.7884/teke.5481
14. Batdı, V., Öztaş, C., & Talan, T. (2021). Fen Bilgisi Dersinde yapılandırmacı yaklaşım uygulamalarının karma-meta yöntem ile analizi. Dicle Üniversitesi Ziya Gökalp Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 40, 33-44. http://dx.doi.org/ 10.14582/DUZGEF.2021.175
15. Batdı, V. (2014a). Harmanlanmış öğrenme ortamlarının öğrencilerin akademik başarılarına etkisi:Bir meta-analiz çalışması. Çankırı Karatekin Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 5(1), 287-302. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/download/article-file/253911
16. Batdı, V. (2014b). Kavram haritası tekniği ile geleneksel öğrenme yönteminin kullanılmasının öğrencilerin başarıları, bilgilerinin kalıcılığı ve tutumlarına etkisi:Bir meta-analiz çalışması. Dumlupınar Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, (42), 93-102. https://search.trdizin.gov.tr/yayin/detay/166983/
17. Beckett, G.H., & Miller, P.C. (2006). Project-based second and foreign language education: past, present, and future. Information Age Publishing.
18. Bryfonski, L., & McKay, T. H. (2017). TBLT implementation and evaluation: A meta-analysis. Language Teaching Research, 23(5), 603-632. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168817744389
19. Büyüköztürk, Ş., Kılıç-Çakmak, E., Akgün, Ö. A., Karadeniz, Ş., ve Demirel, F. (2013). Bilimsel araştırma yöntemleri. Pegem Akademi Yayıncılık.
20. Cantürk Günhan, B., Topuz, F., ve Bedir, D. (2019). Türkiye’deki öğrencilerin matematik dersine yönelik tutumları ile matematik başarıları arasındaki ilişki: Bir meta-analiz çalışması. Erzincan Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 21(3), 148-164. https://doi.org/10.17556/erziefd.483521
21. Cantürk Günhan, B. (2016). The effect of drama based learning applied in Turkey on Success of mathematics: A meta-analysis study. International Online Journal of Educational Sciences, 2016, 8 (2), 145-162. http://dx.doi.org/10.15345/iojes.2016.02.013
22. Chalmers, D. (2007). Drama 3-5: A practical guide to teaching drama to children in the foundation stage. Routledge.
23. Cole, M.W. (2013). Rompiendo el Silencio: Meta-analysis of the effectiveness of peer-mediated learning at improving language outcomes for ELLs. Bilingual Research Journal, 36, 146-166. https://doi.org/10.1080/15235882.2013.814609
24. Çelebi, N.T. (2018). Suggestopedia yönteminin yabancı dil öğretiminde kullanılması üzerine bir meta analiz çalışması (Tez No.530505). [Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Muğla Sıtkı Koçman Üniversitesi]. YÖK Ulusal Tez Merkezi.
25. Çelik, T.İ., Çay, T., & Kanadlı, S. (2021). The effect of Total Physical Response on vocabulary learning/teaching: A mixed research synthesis. English Language Teaching, 14 (12), 154-170. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v14n12p154
26. Çelik, S. (2013). İlköğretim Matematik derslerine kullanılan alternatif öğretim yöntemlerini akademik başarıya etkisi:Bir meta analiz çalışması (Tez No.322084). [Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Eskişehir Osmangazi Üniversitesi]. YÖK Ulusal Tez Merkezi.
27. Çırak Kurt, S., Yıldırım, İ., ve Cücük, E. (2018). Harmanlanmış öğrenmenin akademik başarı üzerine etkisi: Bir meta-analiz çalışması. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 33 (3), 776-802. https://doi.org/10.16986/HUJE.2017034685
28. Dempfle, A. (2006). Evaluation of methods for meta analysis of genetic linkage studies for complex diseases and application to genome scans for asthma and adult height. Doctoral Dissertation, Philipps-Universität Marburg, Germany.
29. Dikmen, M. (2021). EFL learners’ foreign language learning anxiety and language performance: A meta-analysis study. International Journal of Contemporary Educational Research, 8 (3), 206-222. https://doi.org/10.33200/ijcer.908048
30. Ergen, B., & Kanadlı, S. (2017). The effect of self-regulated learning strategies on academic achievement: A meta-analysis study. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, (69), 55-74. http://dx.doi.org/10.14689/ejer.2017.69.4
31. Fried-Booth, D.L. (2002). Project work. Oxford University Press.
32. Gao, R. (2021). The vocabulary teaching mode based on the theory of constructivisim. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 11 (4), 442-446. http://dx.doi.org/10.17507/tpls.1104.14
33. Graves, M.F. (2007). Conceptual and empirical bases for providing struggling readers with multifaceted and long-term vocabulary instruction. In B.M. Taylor & J.E. Ysseldyke (Eds.), Effective instruction for struggling readers, K-6 (pp. 55-86). Teachers College Press.
34. Gültekin, M., Karadağ, R. & Yılmaz, F. (2007). Yapılandırmacılık ve öğretim uygulamalarına yansılamaları. Anadolu Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 7 (2), 503-528. https://earsiv.anadolu.edu.tr/xmlui/handle/11421/379
35. Gürdoğan-Bayır, Ö., & Bozkurt, M. (2018). Effectiveness of cooperative learning approaches used in the course of Social Studies in Turkey: A meta-analysis study. European Journal of Education Studies, 4 (10), 171-192. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1313863
36. Haidich, A. B. (2010). Meta‐analysis in medical research.Hippokratia,14 (Suppl 1), 29–37. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3049418/pdf/hippokratia-14-29.pdf
37. Harjali, H. (2019). Building constructivist learning environment at Senior High School in Indonesia. The Qualitative Report, 24 (9), 2197-2214. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2019.4001
38. Kablan, Z., Topan, B., ve Erkan, B. (2013) Sınıf içi öğretimde materyal kullanımının etkililik düzeyi: Bir meta-analiz çalışması. Kuramdan Uygulamaya Eğitim Bilimleri, 13(3), 1629-1644 https://doi.org/10.12738/estp.2013.3.1692
39. Kanadlı, S., Ünal, K., ve Karakuş, F. (2015). Kuantum öğrenme modelinin akademik başarıya etkisi: Bir meta-analiz çalışması. Mustafa Kemal Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 12(32), 136-157. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/download/article-file/183455
40. Kansızoğlu, H.B. (2017). The effect of graphic organizers on language teaching and learning areas: A meta-analysis study. Education and Science, 42 (191), 139-164. https://doi.org/10.15390/EB.2017.6777
41. Kaplan, A., M. Duran., ve Baş, G. (2015). Matematik dersinde çoklu zeka kuramına dayalı öğretimin akademik başarıya etkisi: Bir meta-analiz çalışması. Mersin Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 11(3), 814-831. https://doi.org/10.17860/efd.54955
42. Karabulut, H.İ. (2020). Teknoloji destekli alternatif öğretim yöntemlerinin İngilizce Dersi başarısı üzerindeki etkililiği: Bir meta-analiz çalışması (Tez No.637766). [Doktora Tezi, Eskişehir Osmangazi Üniversitesi]. YÖK Ulusal Tez Merkezi.
43. Karadağ, E., İşçi, S., Öztekin, S., ve Anar, S. (2016). Okul iklimi ve akademik başarı ilişkisi: bir meta-analiz çalışması. İnönü Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 17(2), 107-122. https://doi.org/10.17679/iuefd.17294446
44. Kıymaz, Ö. (2021). Çağdaş öğrenme yaklaşımlarının İngilizce öğretiminde akademik başarıya etkisi: Bir meta analiz çalışması (Tez No.697550). [Yüksek Lisans Tezi, İnönü Üniversitesi]. YÖK Ulusal Tez Merkezi
45. Kök, A. (2018). Harmanlanmış öğrenme yönteminin etkililiği: Bir meta-analiz çalışması (Tez No.508294). [Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Necmettin Erbakan Üniversitesi]. YÖK Ulusal Tez Merkezi.
46. Landis, J.R., & Koch, G.G. (1977). The measurement of observer agreement for catergorical data. Biometrics, 33 (1), 159-174. https://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/2529310.pdf
47. Lee, S., Kuo, L.J., Xu, Z., & Hu, X. (2020). The effects of technology-integrated classroom instruction on K-12 English language learners’ literacy development: A meta-analysis. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 35 (5-6), 1106-1137. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2020.1774612
48. Li, Y.D., Ding, G.H., & Zhang, C.Y. (2021). Effects of learner centred education on academic achievement:A meta-analysis. Educational Studies, (Published Online),1-14. https://doi.org/10.1080/03055698.2021.1940874
49. Lipsey, M.W., & Wilson, D.B. (2001). Practical meta-analysis. Sage Publications.
50. MEB. (2018). İngilizce dersi öğretim programı (İlkokul ve Ortaokul 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 ve 8. sınıflar ve 9, 10,11 ve 12.sınıflar). http://mufredat.meb.gov.tr/Programlar.aspx.
51. Milli Eğitim Bakanlığı [MEB]. (2012). 12 yıl zorunlu eğitim: Sorular – cevaplar. https://www.meb.gov.tr/duyurular/duyurular2012/12Yil_Soru_Cevaplar.pdf
52. Mullen, B., Muellerleile, P., & Bryant, B. (2001). Cumulative meta-analysis: A consideration of indicators of sufficiency and stability. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27(11), 1450–1462. https://doi.org/10.1177/01461672012711006
53. Nurmaya, K. (2020). Cooperative learning application in English Language Learning: A meta-analysis (A Statistical Synthesis of Students’ Theses in English Education Department of UIN Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta at 2015-2019 Period). Undergraduate thesis, Educational Sciences Faculty, UIN Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta, Indonesia.
54. Oktay Güzeller, C. (2016). Effects of mobile learning on academic achievement: A meta analysis. Adıyaman Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 8 (23), 528-561 http://dx.doi.org/10.14520/adyusbd.54760
55. Poonpon, K. (2011). Enhancing English skills through project-based learning. The English Teacher , XL, 1-10. https://melta.org.my/journals/TET/downloads/tet40_01_01.pdf
56. Rahmati, J., Izadpanah, S., & Shahnavaz, A. (2021). A meta-analysis on educational technology in English language teaching. Language Testing in Asia, 11(7), 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40468-021-00121-w
57. Robat, E.S., Khodabakhshzadeh, H., Ashraf, H., & Shirvan, M.E. (2021). Strategy-based teaching in ELT: A meta-analysis. Language Related Research, 12 (3), 315-345. https://doi.org/10.29252/LRR.12.3.11
58. Schulze, R. (2007). The state and the art of meta-analysis [Editorial]. Zeitschrift für Psychologie/Journal of Psychology, 215 (2), 87–89. https://doi.org/10.1027/0044-3409.215.2.87
59. Sedgwick, P. (2012). The Hawthorne effect. BJM Clinical Research, 344 (d8262). https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.d8262
60. Shahamat, A. (2014). The integration of cooperative learning in fifth grade EFL classrooms (Thesis No.383918). [Master’s Thesis, Bahçeşehir University]. Council of Higher Education Thesis Center.
61. Shahnama, M., Ghonsooly, B., & Shirvan, M.E. (2021). A meta-analysis of relative effectiveness of flipped learning in English as second/foreign language research. Education Tech Research Dev 69, 1355–1386.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-021-09996-1
62. Sherman, T. M., and Kurshan B. L. (2005). Constructing learning: Using Technology to Support Teaching for Understanding. Learning & Leading with Technology, 32(5), 10-39. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ697302.pdf
63. Sur, E. (2022). A systematic compilation study on digitalization in language education. Gazi Üniversitesi Gazi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 42(1), 541-584. https://doi.org/10.17152/gefad.948900
64. Şan, İ., Kıymaz, Ö., & Kış, İ. (2020). Effect of traditional methods in teaching English on academic achievement: A meta-analysis study. International Journal of Curriculum and Instruction, 12 (Special Issue), 144-158. http://ijci.wcci-international.org/index.php/IJCI/article/view/325/130
65. Şaşmaz Ören, F., ve Sarı, K. (2019). Araştırmaya dayalı öğrenme stratejisinin öğrencilerin üst düzey düşünme becerilerine etkisi: Bir meta-analiz çalışması. Pamukkale Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, (46), 328-348. https://doi.org/10.9779/pauefd.460168
66. Şen, S., & Yıldırım, İ. (2020). CMA ile meta-analiz uygulamaları. Anı Yayıncılık.
67. Şimşek, H. & Özaslan, D. (2021). İngilizce öğretiminde kullanılan öğrenci merkezli yöntem ve tekniklerin akademik başarıya etkisi: Bir meta analiz çalışması. Ankara University Journal of Faculty of Educational Sciences (JFES) , 54 (2) , 599-626. https://doi.org/10.30964/auebfd.740077
68. Thalheimer, W. & Cook, S. (2002). How to calculate effect size from published research: A simplified methodology. http://www.bwgriffin.com/gsu/courses /edur9131/content/Effect_Sizes_pdf5.pdf
69. Tomakin, E., ve Yeşilyurt, M. (2013). Bilgisayar destekli yabancı dil öğretim çalışmalarının meta analizi: Türkiye örneği. Yüzüncü Yıl Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 10(1), 248-263. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/download/article-file/374384
70. Toraman, Ç., Çelik, Ö.C., ve Çakmak, M. (2018). Oyun-tabanlı öğrenme ortamlarının akademik başarıya etkisi: Bir meta–analiz çalışması. Kastamonu Education Journal, 26(6), 1803-1811. https://doi.org/10.24106/kefdergi.2074
71. Tutal, Ö. (2019). Aktif öğrenme yaklaşımının öğrencilerin akademik başarılarına, derse yönelik tutumlarına ve öğrenilenlerin kalıcılığına etkisi: Bir meta-analiz çalışması (Tez No.612962). [Doktora Tezi, Dicle Üniversitesi]. YÖK Ulusal Tez Merkezi.
72. Yıldırım, E. (2021). Temel eğitim düzeyinde drama yönteminin etkililiği üzerine bir meta araştırma (Tez No.681080). [Doktora Tezi, İstanbul Üniversitesi].YÖK Ulusal Tez Merkezi
73. Yıldırım, İ, Çırak-Kurt, S., & Şen, S. (2019). The effect of teaching “learning strategies”on academic achievement: A meta-analysis study. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 79, 87-114, https://doi.org/10.14689/ejer.2019.79.5
74. Zuo, W. (2011). The effects of cooperative learning on improving college students’ reading comprehension. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 1 (8), 986-989. https://doi.org/10.4304/tpls.1.8.986-989
75. Abuh, J., Omachonu, C. G., & Ibrahim, Y. (2019). Effects of drama and theatre on students’ achievement in language teaching. International Journal of English Language Teaching, 7(3), 32-39. https://www.eajournals.org/wp-content/uploads/Effects-of-Drama-and-Theatre-on-Students%E2%80%99-Achievement-in-Language-Teaching.pdf
76. Afana, S.M. (2012). The impact of educational drama intervention on Palestinian ninth graders’ English language speaking skills at Gaza UNRWA Schools [Unpublished Master’s thesis]. The Islamic University of Gaza.
77. Afzalimir, S.A., & Safa, M.A. (2021). The comparative effects of cooperative and competitive learning on speaking ability and self-confidence of EFL learners. Journal of English Language Teaching and Leaning, 13 (27), 1-33. http://dx.doi.org/10.22034/elt.2021.43962.2335
78. Aghayani, B., & Hajmohammadi, E. (2019). Project-based learning: Promoting EFL learners writing skills. LLT Journal: A Journal on Language and Language Teaching, 22 (1), 78-85. http://doi.org/10.24071/llt.2019.220108
79. Ahmadi, N., Motallebzade, K., & Fatemi, M.A.(2014). The effect of cooperative learning strategies on Iranian intermediate students’ writing achievement. Open Access Library Journal, 1 (e961), 1-9. http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/oalib.1100961
80. Ahmadian, M., Amerian, M., & Tajabadi, A.(2014). The effect of collaborative dialogue on EFL learner’s vocabulary acquisition and retention. International Journal of Applied Linguistics & English Literature, 3 (4), 38-45. http://dx.doi.org/10.7575/aiac.ijalel.v.3n.4p.38
81. Ajabshir, Z. F., & Panahifar, F.(2020). The effect of teachers' scaffolding and peers' collaborative dialogue on speech act production in symmetrical and asymmetrical groups. Iranian Journal of Language Teaching Research, 8 (1), 45-61. https://doi.org/10.30466/ijltr.2020.120807
82. Akdağ, N. (2010). İlköğretim 4. sınıf İngilizce öğretiminde drama yönteminin erişiye etkisi (Tez No.262050). [Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Niğde Üniversitesi]. YÖK Ulusal Tez Merkezi.
83. Aladini, A.A.A. (2020). A suggested program based on CLIL and drama and its effect on improving 9th graders’ English speaking skills and their self-efficacy [Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation]. The Islamic University.
84. Alasmari, N., & Alshae’el, A.(2020). The effect of using drama in English language learning among young learners: A case study of 6th grade female pupils in Sakaka City. International Journal of Education and Literacy Studies, 8 (1), 61-73. http://dx.doi.org/10.7575/aiac.ijels.v.8n.1p.61
85. Albesher, K.B. (2012). Developing writing skills of ESL students through the collaborative learning strategy [Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation]. Newcastle University.
86. Aldossary, K.S. (2021). The impact of collaborative writing on EFL learners writing development: A longitudinal classroom-based study in Saudi Arabia. Arab World Journal, 12 (3), 174-185. https://dx.doi.org/10.24093/awej/vol12no3.12
87. Alfares, N. (2020). The effect of using a self-regulated jigsaw task on female students’ performance in the course of curriculum reading in English at Umm Al-Qura University in Saudi Arabia. Arab World English Journal, 11 (4), 519-533. https://dx.doi.org/10.24093/awej/vol11no4.33
88. Alghamdi, R., & Gillies, R. (2013). The impact of cooperative learning in comparison to traditional learning (Small Group) on EFL learners’ outcomes when learning English as a foreign language. Asian Social Science, 9(13), 19-27. http://dx.doi.org/10.5539/ass.v9n13p19
89. Alhaidari, M.S. (2006). The effectiveness of using cooperative learning to promote reading comprehension, vocabulary, and fluency achievement scores of male fourth-and fifth-grade students in a Saudi Arabian School [Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation]. The Pennsylvania State University.
90. Alharbi, L.A. (2008). The effectiveness of using cooperative learning method on ESL reading comprehension performance, students’ attitudes toward CL, and students’ motivation toward reading of secondary stage in Saudi Public Girls’ Schools [Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation]. West Virginia University.
91. Alibabaee, A., Mehranfar, Z., & Zarei, G.R. (2014). Role of teacher-constructed vs. cooperative concept map learning strategies in EFL learners’ reading comprehension and autonomy. Journal of Research in Applied Linguistics, 5(1), 3-23. https://rals.scu.ac.ir/article_10735.html
92. Al-Mubireek, S. (2021). The effects of cooperative learning versus traditional teaching on students’ achievement: A case study. TESOL International Journal, 16 (2), 31-55. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1329402.pdf
93. Almuslimi, F.K.A. (2016). The effect of cooperative learning strategy on English reading skills of 9th grade Yemeni students and their attitudes towards the strategy. IMPACT: International Journal of Research in Humanities, Arts and Literature, 4(2), 41-58. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Fazee-Almuslimi-2/publication/356194315
94. Al-Najjar, Z., & Abdel-Qader, A.M.K.A. (2021). Improving students' functional writing through drama. Beni-Seuf University Journal of College Education, 18 (102), 618-637. https://doi.org/10.21608/jfe.2021.158130
95. Al Odwan, T. A. A. H.(2012). The effect of the directed reading thinking activity through cooperative learning on English secondary stage students’ reading comprehension in Jordan. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 2(16), 138-151. http://www.ijhssnet.com/view.php?u=http://www.ijhssnet.com/journals/Vol_2_No_16_Special_Issue_August_2012/15.pdf
96. Alotaibi, M.G. (2020). The effect of project-based learning model on persuasive writing skills of Saudi EFL Secondary School students. English Language Teaching, 13(7), 19-26. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v13n7p19
97. Alrajhi, A. M., Abdelrahman, O. N. E. M. B., & Al Homoud, F. A. (2013). The effect of using drama on improving preparatory year students' oral proficiency at Al-Imam Muhammad Ibn Saud Islamic University. Journal of Arabic and Human Sciences, 7 (1), 1-53. https://doi.org/10.12816/0009592
98. Alrayah, H.(2018). The effectiveness of cooperative learning activities in enhancing EFL learners’ fluency. English Language Teaching, 11(4), 21-31. http://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v11n4p21
99. Al-Tamimi, N. O. M., & Attamimi, R. A.(2014). Effectiveness of cooperative learning in enhancing speaking skills and attitudes towards learning English. International Journal of Linguistics, 6(4), 27-45. http://dx.doi.org/10.5296/ijl.v6i4.6114
100. Al Zahrani, A. K. M., & Arafat, M. R. (2019). The effectiveness of using drama techniques in teaching difficult units of EFL course on developing language proficiency and on decreasing anxiety level of intermediate stage students. Journal of Research in Curriculum Instruction and Educational Technology, 5(3), 11-45. https://doi.org/10.21608/jrciet.2019.54141
101. Anggraini, A.(2021). The effect of drama and the eleventh grade students’ self-esteem in improving their speaking ability at Rahmaniyah High School of Sekayu Musi Banyuasin. Al-Ulum: Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Kajian Islam, 1(1), 1-40. https://jurnal.stairahmaniyah.ac.id/index.php/alulum/article/view/10
102. Anidi, C.A., Obumneke-Okeke, I.M., Nwune, E. C., & Okwubuda, E.N. (2022). Effect of cooperative learning on primary school pupils’ reading achievement in Awaka Metropolis. Journal Plus Education, 30 (1), 67-78. https://doi.org/10.24250/jpe/1/2022/EN/OEC/ONNK/CINO
103. Anshu, A.H., & Yesuf, M.Y. (2022). Effects of collaborative writing on EFL students’ paragraph writing performance: Focus on content and coherence. International Journal of Education & Literacy Studies, 10 (1), 36-47. http://dx.doi.org/10.7575/aiac.ijels.v.10n.1p.36
104. Anwer, M., Tatlah, I.A., & Butt, I.H. (2018). Effect of cooperative learning on students’ achievement in English tenses. Pakistan Journal of Education, 35(2), 37-52. http://dx.doi.org/10.30971/pje.v35i2.541
105. Araban, S., Zainalipour, H., Saadi, R.H.R., Javdan, M., Sezide, K., & Sajjadi, S. (2012). Study of cooperative learning effects on self-efficacy and academic achievement in English lesson of High School students. Journal of Basic and Applied Scientific Research, 2 (9), 8524-8526. https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.1066.9114&rep=rep1&type=pdf
106. Asrul, N., Rajagukguk, S.F., Sitepu, V.O., Siregar, P.M., & Novri, A. (2021). The effect of project-based learning on students’ achievement in writing narrative text. Journal of English Language and Education, 6 (2), 103-109. https://doi.org/10.31004/jele.v6i2.170
107. Aşık, S. (2018). The effects of paper-based and computer supported collaborative writing on the writing performances of pre-intermediate level prepatory students at Uludağ University (Thesis No. 527141). [Master’s thesis, Gazi University]. Council of Higher Education Thesis Center.
108. Aulia, A.R. (2018). The effectiveness of project based learning in teaching descriptive writing text by using pictures of famous people (an experimental study in the 8th grade students of SMP Negeri 1 Kedungjati in the academic year of 2018/2019) [Undergraduate thesis]. Teacher Training and Education Faculty State Institute for Islamic Studies, Salatiga, Indonesia.
109. Azap, S.(2012). The effect of cooperative learning activities based on multiple intelligences theory on vocabulary learning in EFL classes (Thesis No.308762). [Master’s thesis, Ondokuz Mayıs University]. Council of Higher Education Thesis Center.
110. Babapour, M., Ahangari, S., & Ahour, T. (2019). The effect of shadow reading and collaborative strategic reading on EFL learners’ reading comprehension across two proficiency levels. Innovation in Language and Teaching, 13 (4), 618-330. https://doi.org/10.1080/17501229.2018.1465059
111. Bağçeci, E. (2015). Developing writing skills through drama in EFL classroom (Tez No.412193). [Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Muğla Sıtkı Koçman Üniversitesi]. YÖK Ulusal Tez Merkezi.
112. Bakar, N.I.A., Noordin, N., & Razali, A.B. (2019). Improving oral communicative competence in English using project-based learning activities. English Language Teaching, 12 (4), 73-84. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v12n4p73
113. Bastian, P. (2014). Drama and second language anxiety: The effect of drama on English oral proficiency of language anxious and non-anxious Dutch secondary school pupils. [Unpublished Bachelor’s Thesis]. Ultrecht University.
114. Baş, G. (2012). The effects of cooperative learning method on students’ achievement and attitudes towards English lesson. Eğitimde Kuram ve Uygulama, 8(1), 72-93. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/download/article-file/63331
115. Baş, G. (2011). Investigating the effects of project-based learning on students’ academic achievement and attitudes towards English lesson. TOJNED: The Online Journal Of New Horizons In Education, 1(4), 1-22. https://www.tojned.net/journals/tojned/articles/v01i04/v01i04-01.pdf
116. Baş, G., & Beyhan, Ö. (2010). Effects of multiple intelligences supported project-based learning on students’ achievement levels and attitudes towards English lesson. International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education, 2(3), 365-385. https://www.iejee.com/index.php/IEJEE/article/view/245/241
117. Baş, G. (2009). İngilizce dersinde işbirlikli öğrenme yönteminin öğrencilerin erişi, derse karşı tutumlarına ve öğrenilenlerin kalıcılığına etkisi. Milli Eğitim Dergisi, 39(184), 240-256. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/milliegitim/issue/36201/407177
118. Başören, M.T. (2015). Drama öğretim tekniğinin yabancı dil kelime öğretimine ve öğrencilerin kelime öğrenmeye yönelik tutumlarına etkisi (Tez No.407560). [Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Necmettin Erbakan Üniversitesi]. YÖK Ulusal Tez Merkezi
119. Bataineh, R. F., & Salah, N. E. A. (2017). The effectiveness of drama-based instruction in Jordanian EFL students' writing performance. TESOL International Journal, 12(2), 103-118. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1247797.pdf
120. Batdı, V. (2013). İngilizce öğretiminde işbirlikli öğrenme destekli eğlenceli etkinliklerin öğrencilerin öz-yeterlik becerileri, öz-düzenleme stratejileri, üstbilişsel becerileri, motivasyonları ve akademik başarılarına etkisi (Tez No. 349357). [Doktora Tezi, Fırat Üniversitesi]. YÖK Ulusal Tez Merkezi.
121. Bergil, A.S. (2010). İngilizce öğretiminde konuşma becerilerini geliştirmeye yönelik alternatif bir teknik: Yaratıcı drama (Tez No.249760). [Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Gaziosmanpaşa Üniversitesi]. YÖK Ulusal Tez Merkezi.
122. Berzener, Ü.A. (2020). The role of cooperative learning on learning English as a foreign language (Thesis No.649343).[ Master’s thesis, Trakya University]. Council of Higher Education Thesis Center.
123. Biria, R., & Jafari, S. (2013). The impact of collaborative writing on the writing fluency of Iranian EFL learners. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 4 (1), 164-175. https://doi.org/10.4304/jltr.4.1.164-175
124. Cahyaningrum, T., & Widyantoro, A. (2020). Effect of project-based learning and problem-based learning on the students’ writing achievement. LingTera, 7(1), 72-83. https://doi.org/10.21831/lt.v7i1.13700
125. Carrillo, N.M.R., Dávalos, G.A.R., & Valle, V.V.Y. (2019). The learning approach in the English oral production influence of project-based. Explorador Digital, 3(3), 182-203. https://doi.org/10.33262/exploradordigital.v3i3.1.880
126. Chávez, A.A. (2013). Application of project based learning (PBL) to motivate English learning of ninth year students of Unidad Educativa Particular Eloy Alfaro of Machala City, during the first term of 2012-2013 academic year [Undergraduate thesis]. Escuela Politecnica Del Ejercito [Army Polytechnic School].
127. Chayaratheee, S., & Waugh, R. F. (2006, November 22-24). Teaching English as a foreign language to grade 6 students in Thailand: Cooperative learning versus Thai communicative method [Oral Presentation]. Paper presented at the EDU-COM 2006 International Conference, Perth Western Australia https://ro.ecu.edu.au/ceducom/69/
128. Chelghoum, A., & Grine, N. (2018). Developing EFL learners’ academic writing through collaborative writing projects. RumeliDe Dil ve Edebiyat Araştırmaları Dergisi, (13), https://doi.org/10.29000/rumelide.504255
129. Chen, S.F. (2005). Cooperative learning, multiple intelligences and proficiency: Application in College English language teaching and learning. Doctoral Dissertation, Australian Catholic University Trescowthick School of Education, Australia.
130. Chen, M.L. (2005). The effects of cooperative learning approach on Taiwanese ESL students’ motivation, English learning, reading, and speaking competences. [Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation]. La Sierra University.
131. Chen, H.Y. (2009). The impact of phonetic instruction on the oral proficiency of English language learners in a cooperative learning setting [Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation]. Texas A & M University.
132. Chou, M.H. (2022).Using literature circles to teach graded readers in English: An investigation into reading performance and strategy use. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 16 (2), 144-163. https://doi.org/10.1080/17501229.2021.1885412
133. Chukwuyenum, A. N., Nwankwo, A. E., & Toochi, U. (2014). Impact of cooperative learning on English language achievement among senior secondary school students in Delta State, Nigeria: Implication for counselling. Journal of Emerging Trends in Educational Research and Policy Studies, 5(7), 70-76. https://hdl.handle.net/10520/EJC156765
134. Çay, Y. (2017). Kukla modeli ile İngilizce öğretiminin ders başarısına etkisi (Tez No.483108). [Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Erciyes Üniversitesi]. YÖK Ulusal Tez Merkezi
135. Çelen, İ. (2008). Eğitimde dramada uzman rolü yaklaşımı ve İngilizce öğretimi: İlköğretim dördüncü sınıf öğrencileri üzerine bir araştırma(Tez No.219884). [Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Adnan Menderes Üniversitesi]. YÖK Ulusal Tez Merkezi
136. Çınar, C. (2020). The impact of product based collaborative learning on tertiary level EFL learners’ writing development: A self-efficacy based perspective (Thesis No.640937). [Master’s thesis, Gazi University]. Council of Higher Education Thesis Center
137. Çırak, D. (2006). The use of project based learning in teaching English to young learners (Tez No.219189). [Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Selçuk Üniversitesi]. YÖK Ulusal Tez Merkezi
138. Çopur, G. (2011). İngilizce hazırlık sınıflarında işbirliğine dayalı öğrenmenin öğrencilerin dört dil becerisine etkisi (Tez No.308438). [Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Hacettepe Üniversitesi]. YÖK Ulusal Tez Merkezi
139. Dabaghmanesh, T., Zamanian, M., & Bagheri, M.S. (2013). The effect of cooperative learning approach on Iranian EFL students’ achievement among different majors in General English Course. International Journal of Linguistics, 5(6), 1-11. http://dx.doi.org/10.5296/ijl.v5i6.4691
140. Dahal, P. (2016). Effectiveness of project based language learning in teaching creative writing [Unpublished Master’s thesis]. Tribhuvan University.
141. Darani, L.H., & Hosseinpour, N. (2019). Pedagogical utility of oral discussion versus collaborative drafting. English Teaching: Practice & Critique, 18 (4), 464-477. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/ETPC-10-2018-0086
142. Darmaji, D. (2018). The role of project-based learning method in improving the students’ speaking skill at SMKN 1 Kraksaan [Unpublishd Master’s thesis]. University of Muhammadiyah Malang.
143. Dashtian, E., Behjat, F., & Kargar, A.A. (2016). Effect of collaborative translation tasks on low intermediate Iranian EFL learner’s listening comprehension. Modern Journal of Language Teaching Methods, 6 (3), 155-175. https://doi.org/10.26655/mjltm.2016.6.1
144. Dávalos, L.G.A.R. (2018). Project-based approach in the English oral production [Unpublished Master’s thesis]. Universidad Técnica de Ambato Dirección de Posgrado.
145. Demirekin, M., & Yalçın, H. (2021). Games & drama applications in language acquisition. OPUS–International Journal of Society Researches, 17(37), 4027-4048. https://doi.org/10.26466/opus.881111
146. Dilek, I. (2010). A quasi-experimental study on the effects of cooperative learning activities in reading classes (Tez No.270880). [Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Karadeniz Teknik Üniversitesi]. YÖK Ulusal Tez Merkezi.
147. Durukan, E. (2011). Effects of cooperative integrated reading and composition (CIRC) technique on reading-writing skills. Educational Research and Reviews, 6(1), 102-109. https://doi.org/10.5897/ERR.9000129
148. Er, M. (2012). Boosting foreign language self-concept in language classrooms through cooperative learning activities. Procedia- Social and Behavioral Sciences, 69, 535-544. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.11.443
149. Ercan, E.E. (2009). Teaching vocabulary through cooperative learning (Tez No.234871). [Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Selçuk Üniversitesi]. YÖK Ulusal Tez Merkezi
150. Erden, B. (2020). The effects of collaborative writing on EFL students’ attitudes scores and paper readability (Thesis No.635757). [Master thesis, Bahçeşehir University]. Council of Higher Education Thesis Center.
151. Erkol, K. (2011). A study on the attitudes of Çanakkale Onsekiz Mart University prep class students’ towards cooperative writing activities and effects of these activities on students success (Thesis No.345902). [Master’s thesis, Çanakkale Onsekiz Mart University]. Council of Higher Education Thesis Center.
152. Erlidawati, & Syarfuni. (2018). The effect of cooperative integrated reading and composition on reading comprehension of IAIN Lhokseumawe. Indonesia. Advances in Language and Literary Studies, 9(4), 153-160. http://dx.doi.org/10.7575/aiac.alls.v.9n.4p.153
153. Galante, A. (2012). The effects of drama on oral fluency and foreign language anxiety: An exploratory study [Unpublished Master’s thesis]. Brock University.
154. Gani, S.A., Yusuf, Y.Q., & Susiani, R. (2016). Progressive outcomes of collaborative strategic reading to EFL learners. Kasetsart Journal of Social Sciences, 37 (3), 144-149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.kjss.2016.08.004
155. Garcia-Leal, E. (2019). The effect of cooperative learning on English language oral communication among ESL community college students [Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation]. Texas A&M University.
156. Geetha, M.N. (2016). Effectiveness of cooperative learning approach in learning English at B. ED level. Research and Reflections on Education, 14(2), 1-8. https://www.sxcejournal.com/apr-jun-2016/english.pdf
157. Ghodbane, T., & El Achachi, H.H. (2019). Narrowing the achievement gap between EFL students in oral expression through cooperative learning. Arab World English Journal, 10 (2), 365-378. https://dx.doi.org/10.24093/awej/vol10no2.28
158. Ghouti, F. (2015). Improving EFL students’ pronunciation through the use of classroom drama [Unpublished Master thesis]. Larbi Ben M’hidi University-Oum El Bouaghi.
159. Gömleksiz, M.N. (2007). Effectiveness of cooperative learning (jigsaw II) method in teaching English as a foreign language to engineering students (Case of Firat University, Turkey). European Journal of Engineering Education, 32 (5), 613-625. https://doi.org/10.1080/03043790701433343
160. Gömleksiz, M.N., ve Onur, E. (2005). İngilizce öğreniminde işbirlikli öğrenme yönteminin öğrenci başarısı üzerindeki etkisi (Elâzığ Vali Tevfik Gür İlköğretim Okulu Örneği). Milli Eğitim Dergisi, 166, 183-200. http://dhgm.meb.gov.tr/yayimlar/dergiler/Milli_Egitim_Dergisi/166/index3-onur.htm
161. Greenfader, C.M., & Brouillette, L.(2013). Boosting language skills of English learners through dramatization and movement. The Reading Teacher, 67 (3), 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1002/TRTR.1192
162. Griva, E., & Semoglou, K. (2012). Estimating the effectiveness of game-based project for early foreign language learning. English Language Teaching, 5 (9), 33-44. http://dx.doi.org/10.5539/elt.v5n9p33
163. Gupta, M., & Ahuja, J. (2014). Cooperative integrated reading composition (CIRC): Impact on reading comprehension achievement in English among seventh graders. IMPACT: International Journal of Research in Humanities, Arts and Literature, 2(5), 37-46. https://www.impactjournals.us/archives?jname=11_2&year=2014&submit=Search&page=4
164. Güllü, M. (2009). Dramatizasyon yönteminin yabancı dil öğretimi üzerindeki etkisi (Tez No.235503). [Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Beykent Üniversitesi]. YÖK Ulusal Tez Merkezi.
165. Güreş, G. (2008). Kubaşık okuma yazma dinleme ve konuşma tekniğinin ilköğretim dördüncü sınıf öğrencilerinin akademik başarıları ve İngilizce dersine ilişkin tutumlarına etkisi (Tez No.219890). [Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Adnan Menderes Üniversitesi]. YÖK Ulusal Tez Merkezi.
166. Güzelsoy, R. (2018). Yaratıcı drama yönteminin İngilizce kelime edinimine etkisi (Dokuzuncu sınıf örneği) (Tez No.511247). [Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Ankara Üniversitesi]. YÖK Ulusal Tez Merkezi.
167. Haghighi, J.K., & Abdollahi, K. (2014). On the efficacy of team teaching and station teaching in the enhancement of students’ reading comprehension in an EAP situation. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 98, 882-890. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.03.496
168. Han, M.(2015). An empirical study on the application of cooperative learning to English listening classes. English Language Teaching, 8(3), 177-184. http://dx.doi.org/10.5539/elt.v8n3p177
169. Han, S.Y., & Choi, Y.H.(2018). Post-reading question-generation activities and cooperative learning in EFL reading. English Teaching, 73 (2), 37-57. http://doi.org/10.15858/engtea.73.2.201806.37
170. Harahap, T.H. (2015). The effect of drama technique on students’ speaking mastery at grade XI SMA Negeri 1 Angkola Barat. Undergraduate thesis, State Islamic University Tarbiyah and Teacher Training Faculty, Indonesia.
171. Harroug, D. (2022). Developing the speaking skill in English as a foreign language through project-based learning: The case of second year students of English Language at Batna 2 University [Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation]. University of Mostafa Benboulaid.
172. Hsu, M.H. (2006). The effects of dramatic activities on reading comprehension of senior high school EFL students in Taiwan [Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation]. Texas A&M University-Kingsville.
173. Huong, N.T.H., Thang, N.T., Nghi, T.T., Phan, N., & Nguyen, N.(2021). Cooperative learning in EFL reading classes at Lam Dong Ethnic Minority Boarding School. Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, 621, 84-96. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.211224.010
174. Hüdür, H. (2018). Enhancing speaking skills of young adolescents through collaborative activities (Thesis No.508955). [Master’s thesis, Çağ University]. Council of Higher Education Thesis Center.
175. Ishtiaq, M., Ali, Z., & Salem, M. (2017). An experimental study of the effect of student teams achievement divisions (STAD) on vocabulary learning of EFL adult learners. Arab World English Journal, 8(3), 356-375. https://dx.doi.org/10.24093/awej/vol8no3.23
176. Jalilifar, A. (2010). The effect of cooperative learning techniques on college students’ reading comprehension. System: An International Journal of Educational Technology and Applied Linguistics, 38 (1), 96-108. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2009.12.009
177. Jermsittiparsert, K., Menacho-Vargas, I., Supo-Condori, F., Diaz, H. H. A., Cavero-Aybar, H. N., Centellas, Y. Y. T., & Ivanova, O. N., (2021). Cooperative strategies and listening comprehension: The cases of jigsaw and missing information techniques. Cypriot Journal of Educational Science. 16 (3), 1257-1268 https://doi.org/10.18844/cjes.v16i3.5846
178. Jiang, D. (2016). An empirical study on alleviating career English writing anxiety through cooperative learning in a Chinese Polytechnic Institute. International Journal of Higher Education, 5 (1), 173-182. http://dx.doi.org/10.5430/ijhe.v5n1p173
179. Kadan, Ö.F. (2013). Yaratıcı drama yönteminin ortaokul 7.sınıf öğrencilerinin İngilizce dersindeki başarı, tutum ve motivasyonlarına etkisi (Tez No.349393). [Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Mustafa Kemal Üniversitesi].YÖK Ulusal Tez Merkezi.
180. Kagathara, J.A. (2009). A study of effectiveness co-operative learning method for teaching [Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation]. Sardar Patel University.
181. Kanaoka, M. (2005). Creative project-based instruction (CPBI) for the development of ESP-focused language proficiencies. The Japan Language Testing Association Journal Kiyo, 8, 86-101. https://doi.org/10.20622/jltaj.8.0_86
182. Karabuğa, F.(2012). Collaborative strategic reading with adult EFL learners: A collaborative and reflective approach to reading (Thesis No.327687). [Master’s thesis, Çukurova University]. Council of Higher Education Thesis Center.
183. Karafkan, M.A. & Aghazadeh, Z. (2015). Investigating the effects of group investigation (GI) and cooperative integrated reading and comprehension (CIRC) as the cooperative learning techniques on learner’s reading comprehension. International Journal of Applied Linguistics & English Literature, 4(6), 8-15. http://dx.doi.org/10.7575/aiac.ijalel.v.4n.6p.8
184. Kartal, Ş. (2014). İşbirlikli öğrenme yönteminin öğrencilerin İngilizce dersine yönelik tutumlarına ve başarılarına etkileri (Tez No.370135). [Doktora Tezi, İnönü Üniversitesi]. YÖK Ulusal Tez Merkezi.
185. Kavlu, A. (2016). Enhancement of English as a foreign language (EFL) university students’ reading skills through project-based learning implementation (Iraqi Case) [Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation]. International Black Sea University.
186. Kavlu, A. (2015). The effect of project-based learning on undergraduate EFL students’ reading comprehension ability. Journal of Education in Black Sea Region, 1(1), 39-44. https://jebs.ibsu.edu.ge/jms/index.php/jebs/article/view/8/6.
187. Keezhatta, M.S. (2020). Efficacy of role-play in teaching and formative assessment for undergraduate English-major students in Saudi Arabia. Arab World English Journal 11 (3), 549-566. https://dx.doi.org/10.24093/awej/vol11no3.36
188. Keshavarz, S.M., Shahrokhi, M., & Nejad, M.R.T. (2014). The effect cooperative learning techniques on promoting writing skills of Iranian EFL learners. International Journal of Language Learning and Applied Linguistics World, 5 (1), 68-76. http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.428.6486&rep=rep1&type=pdf#page=67
189. Khalil, S.Z., & Hussain, I.A. (2021). The effect of collaborative learning on the proficiency of English language among female students in Government Secondary Schools, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan. The Dialogue, 16 (2), 147-162. https://eds.s.ebscohost.com/eds/pdfviewer/pdfviewer?vid=0&sid=628b155c-7189-4a0f-8acc-19d49542160d%40redis
190. Khalili, T. (2018). A qualitative exploration of Iranian learners’ writing through face-to-face collaborative writing tasks. The Journal of Language Teaching and Learning, 8(2), 1-11. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/download/article-file/619295
191. Khan, K. A., Ali, H., Khattak, S. A., & Khan, S. (2018). Impact of cooperative learning on the achievement of EFL tertiary level learners: A case-study of a Mainstream University in a Middle Eastern Country. International Journal of English Linguistics, 8(2), 168-179. http://doi.org/10.5539/ijel.v8n2p168
192. Khan, A., & Akhtar, M. (2017). Investigating the effectiveness of cooperative learning method on teaching of English grammar. Bulletin of Education and Research, 39 (1), 1-16. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1210132.pdf
193. Khan, A. (2015). Learning by collaboration: The impact of cooperative learning on students’ essay writing skills at graduation level in Pakistan. International Journal of Arts & Sciences, 8 (7), 473-478. http://www.universitypublications.net/ijas/0807/pdf/V5G106.pdf
194. Khan, S.A. (2008). An experimental study to evaluate the effectiveness of cooperative learning versus traditional learning method [Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation]. International Islamic University. Khatib, M., & Meihami, H. (2015). Languaging and writing skill: The effect of collaborative writing on EFL students’ writing performance. Advances in Language and Literary Studies, 6 (1), 203-211. http://dx.doi.org/10.7575/aiac.alls.v.6n.1p.203
195. Khodabakhshzadeh, H., & Samadi, F. (2018). The effect of collaborative writing on Iranian EFL learners’ task achievement in writing and their perception. International Journal of Applied Linguistics & English Literature, 7 (1), 113-119. http://dx.doi.org/10.7575/aiac.ijalel.v.7n.1p.113
196. Kılıç, Ş. (2009). Yaratıcı dramanın İngilizce konuşmaya ve tutuma etkisi (Tez No. 249356). [Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Abant İzzet Baysal Üniversitesi]. YÖK Ulusal Tez Merkezi
197. Kil, G. (2019). 6. sınıf yabancı dil (İngilizce) dersinde işbirlikli öğrenme yönteminin öğrencilerin sözcük dağarcıklarını geliştirmelerine ve derse yönelik tutumlarına etkisi (Tez No.542846). [Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Burdur Mehmet Akif Ersoy Üniversitesi]. YÖK Ulusal Tez Merkezi.
198. Kim, J.W. (2007). A comparative study of the effects of explicit-inductive/cooperative instruction versus explicit-deductive/individualistic instruction on the second language acquisition of English relative clauses in Korea University-level EFL learners [Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation]. Alliant International University.
199. Köroğlu, Ü.M. (2011). İngilizce öğretiminde proje tabanlı öğrenme ve portfolyo değerlendirme uygulamalarının lise öğrencilerinin başarısına etkisi (Tez No.306510). [Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Uludağ Üniversitesi]. YÖK Ulusal Tez Merkezi.
200. Köylüoğlu, N. (2010). Using drama in teaching English for young learners (Thesis No.264387). [Master’s thesis, Selçuk University]. Council of Higher Education Thesi Center.
201. Latifa, A. (2021). Collaborative learning as a strategy to improve the English reading comprehension of Indonesian learners in the Agribusiness Department at Muhammadijah University of Parepare. Journal of English Language Teaching and Applied Linguistics, 3 (2), 78-84. https://doi.org/ 10.32996/jeltal.2021.3.1.8
202. Laubengayer, R. (2018). Learning English as a second language in a cooperative learning environment: Does personality type matter? [Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation]. University of Kansas.
203. Lee, Y.E. (2020). The effect of college-language small group cooperative learning on English reading comprehension, English reading motivation and cooperative learning awareness. Journal of Digital Convergence, 18(6), 81-91. https://doi.org/10.14400/JDC.2020.18.6.081
204. Lencioni, G.M. (2013). The effects of explicit reading strategy instruction and cooperative learning on reading comprehension in fourth grade students [Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation]. The University of San Francisco.
205. Li, J. (2017). An empirical case study on college English academic writing with project-based learning model. Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, 8, 140-142. https://doi.org/10.2991/icemeet-16.2017.28
206. Liao, H.C. (2005). Effects of cooperative learning on motivation, learning strategy utilization, and grammar achievement of English language learners in Taiwan [Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation]. University of New Orleans.
207. Liao, H.C., Li, Y.C., & Wang, Y.H. (2019). Optimal cooperative learning grouping to improve Medical University students’ English competencies. SAGE Open, (July 2019), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244019861454 Mackenzie, A. (2015). Using collaborative learning tasks to expand vocabulary knowledge. International Journal of Arts & Sciences, 8 (6), 129-138. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/298788536_Using_Collaborative_Learning_Tasks_to_Expand_Vocabulary_Knowledge
208. Marashi, H., & Baygzadeh, L. (2010). Using cooperative learning to enhance EFL learners’ overall achievement. Iranian Journal of Applied Linguistics [IJAL], 3 (1), 73-98. https://www.sid.ir/en/Journal/ViewPaper.aspx?ID=247504
209. Marwati (2020). Improving students’ speaking skill through drama at the eighth grade of SMPN 9 Palopo [UnpublishedUndergraduate thesis].Palopo State Islamic Institute.
210. Marzban, A. & Alinejad, F. (2014). The effect of cooperative learning on reading comprehension of Iranian EFL learners. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 116, 3744-3748. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.01.834
211. Marzban, A., & Akbarnejad, A.S. (2013). The effect of cooperative reading strategies on improving reading comprehension of Iranian university students. Procedia- Social and Behavioral Sciences, 70, 936-942. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.01.141
212. McCown, M.A. (2013). The effects of collaborative strategic reading on informational text comprehension and metacognitive awareness of fifth grade students [Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation]. Liberty University.
213. McDonough K., & De Vleeschauwer, J. (2019). Comparing the effect of collaborative and individual prewriting on EFL learners’ writing development. Journal of Second Language Writing, 44, 123-130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2019.04.003
214. Meng, J. (2017). An empirical study on the application of cooperative learning to comprehensive English classes in Chinese Independent College. English Language Teaching, 10 (2), 94-99. http://dx.doi.org/10.5539/elt.v10n2p94
215. Meng, J. (2010). Jigsaw cooperative learning in English reading. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 1 (4), 501-504. https://doi.org/10.4304/jltr.1.4.501-504
216. Migdad, S.I. (2016). The impact of project-based learning strategy on 3rd Graders’ Acquisition of English vocabulary and leadership skills at UNRWA Schools in Gaza [Unpublished Master’s thesis]. The Islamic University Gaza Faculty of Education.
217. Min, H. (2015, 19-21 December). Cooperative learning applied in college English reading classes. In Proceedings of the Information Science and Management Engineering III - ISME, Sanaya, ISBN 978-989-758-163-2, pages 228-232. https://doi.org/10.5220/0006022902280232
218. Minh, B.T. H. (2016). Developing the speaking competences of primary school students in English as a foreign language class in Vietnam through drama activities [Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation]. Georg-August-University of Göttingen.
219. Miriam, T.P. (2020). The impact of project-based methodology on vocabulary learning in EFL: A quasi-experimental study in a Valencian school [Unpublished Master’s thesis]. Centro de Estudios de Postgrado.
220. Mislena., Erlina., & Anggraini, H.W. (2020). The application of project-based learning (PBL) through storyboard to improve reading achievement of the 10th grade students. Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, 513, 395-401. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.201230.136
221. Moghaddam, M.Y., & Faruji, L.F. (2013). Cooperative tasks and lexical development of EFL learners. The Electronic Journal for English as a Second Language, 17 (2), 1-10. http://www.tesl-ej.org/wordpress/issues/volume17/ej66/ej66a2/
222. Mohamed, A.R., Nair, S., Kaur, T., & Fletcher, L.A. (2008). Using cooperative learning approach to enhance writing skills of pre-university students. Educationist, 11 (1), 7-17. http://file.upi.edu/Direktori/JURNAL/EDUCATIONIST/Vol._II_No._1-Januari_2008/2_Abdul_Rashid_Mohamed_rev.pdf
223. Motaei, B. (2014). On the effect of cooperative learning on General English achievement of Kermanshah Islamic Azad University Students. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 98, 1249-1254. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.03.540
224. Muamaroh. (2013). Improving Indonesian university students’ spoken English using group work and cooperative learning [Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation]. Charles Darwin University.
225. Mubarok, H., & Sofiana, N. (2017). Cooperative integrated reading and composition (CIRC) and reading motivation: Examining the effect on students’ reading ability. Lingua Cultura, 11 (2). 121-126. http://dx.doi.org/10.21512/lc.v11i2.1824
226. Mujtaba, S.M., Reynolds, B.L., Parkash, R., & Singh, M.K.M. (2021). Individual and collaborative processing of written corrective feedback affects second language writing accuracy and revision. Assessing Writing, 50, 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2021.100566
227. Munawar, S., & Sittar, K. (2021). Effect of cooperative learning on English reading skill at Elementary Level in the subject of English. Journal of Elementary Education, 31 (1), 37-53. http://journals.pu.edu.pk/journals/index.php/jee/article/view/1629
228. Mutiara, W.E., S. (2019). Enhancing speaking skills and the four Cs through project-based learning for the electrical engineering students of Sultan Aguns Islamic University in the academic year of 2017/2018 [Unpublished Master’s thesis]. Dponegoro University.
229. Naeimi, M., & Foo, T.C.V. (2014). A comparison of vocabulary learning strategies of Iranian EFL university students: Repeating versus cooperating with peers. English Language Teaching, 7 (7), 102-110. http://dx.doi.org/10.5539/elt.v7n7p102
230. Naim, I. A. M., Luqman, N. M. A. N., & Matmin, J. (2020). Enhancing students' writing performance in higher learning through Think-Write-Pair-Share: An experimental study. Asian Journal of University Education, 16 (3), 255-264. http://doi.org/10.24191/ajue.v16i3.8396
231. Namaziandost, E., Gilakjani, A. P., & Hidayatullah. (2020). Enhancing pre-intermediate EFL learners’ reading comprehension through the use of Jigsaw technique. Cogent Arts & Humanities, 7 (1), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311983.2020.1738833
232. Namaziandost, E., Shatalebi, V., & Nasri, M. (2019). The impact of cooperative learning on developing speaking ability and motivation toward learning English. Journal of Language and Education, 5 (3), 83-101. https://doi.org/10.17323/jle.2019.9809
233. Nassaji, H., & Tian, J. (2010). Collaborative and individual output tasks and their effects on learning English phrasal verbs. Language Teaching Research, 14 (4), 397-419. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168810375364
234. Nassar, N. (2018). Utilizing cooperative learning activities to enhance reading comprehension, student—student interaction, and motivation in the EFL classroom. مجلة القراءة والمعرفة [Journal of Reading and Knowledge], 18 (204), 1-23. https://doi.org/10.21608/mrk.2018.100460
235. Nassir, S.M.S. (2014). The effectiveness of project-based learning strategy on ninth graders’ achievement level and their attitude towards English in Governmental Schools-North Governorate [Unpublished Master’s thesis]. The Islamic University of Gaza.
236. Ning, H., & Hornby, G. (2010). The effectiveness of cooperative learning in teaching English to Chinese tertiary learners. Effective Education, 2 (2), 99-116. https://doi.org/10.1080/19415532.2010.522792
237. Ningsih, I.K. (2016). The effect of project-based learning using cartoon story maker on writing skill at Man Katingan Hılır [Unpublished Undergraduate thesis].The State of Islamic Institute of Palangka Raya The Faculty of Terbiyah and Teaching Training, Indonesia.
238. Nostratinia, M., & Fateh, N.H. (2017). The comparative effect of collaborative strategic reading and content-based instruction on EFL learners’ reading comprehension. International Journal of Applied Linguistics & English Literature, 6(6), 165-174. http://dx.doi.org/10.7575/aiac.ijalel.v.6n.6p.165
239. Nozen, S. Z., & Fathi, K. (2016). A study of the effectiveness of using drama for the enhancement of the accuracy and fluency in EFL learners. Malaysian Journal of Languages and Linguistics, 5(2), 57-73. https://doi.org/10.24200/mjll.vol5iss2pp57-73
240. Nugroho, K. Y., & Fitri, K. (2016). The effectiveness of jigsaw learning strategy to improve students’ reading ability. EduLite: Journal of English Education, Literature and Culture, 1(1), 68-75. http://dx.doi.org/10.30659/e.1.1.68-75
241. Nurjannah, S., & Sudarwinoto. (2020). The use of debate’s motion in improving students’ English-speaking skill through project-based learning using mix method. Journal of Physics: Conference Series , 1477, 1-6. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1477/4/042008
242. O'Gara, P. (2008). To be or have not been: Learning language tenses through drama. Issues in Educational Research, 18 (2), 156-166 http://www.iier.org.au/iier18/ogara.html
243. Ok, B. (2005). Effects of drama practices upon learning and retaining word pairs in EFL classes (Tez No.162734). [Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Ondokuz Mayıs Üniversitesi]. YÖK Ulusal Tez Merkezi.
244. Özdemir, E. (2014). Yabancı dil öğretiminde öz düzenlemeli jigsaw IV tekniğinin üniversite öğrencilerinin başarılarına ve tutumlarına etkisi (Tez No.361921). [Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Bülent Ecevit Üniversitesi]. YÖK Ulusal Tez Merkezi.
245. Öztürk-Pat, Ö., & Yılmaz, M. (2021). Impact of creative drama method on students’ speaking skills. Kuramsal Eğitim Bilim Dergisi [Journal of Theoretical Educational Science], 14 (2), 223-245. http://doi.org/10.30831/akukeg.740277
246. Pakpahan, R.O.A. (2018). Improving speaking skill of Tourism Vocational High School students through project based learning. RETAIN, 6(2), 44-51. https://ejournal.unesa.ac.id/index.php/retain/article/view/24822
247. Paksoy, E. (2008). The effects of process drama on enhancement of self-esteem and oral skills in English language classroom (Tez No.217094). [Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Çukurova Üniversitesi]. YÖK Ulusal Tez Merkezi.
248. Pan, C. Y., & Wu, H. Y. (2013). The cooperative learning effects on English reading comprehension and learning motivation of EFL freshmen. English Language Teaching, 6 (5), 13-27. http://dx.doi.org/10.5539/elt.v6n5p13
249. Park, P. & Lee, E.(2019). The impact of an arts project-based language program to enhance EFL learning. The Journal of Asia TEFL, 16(4), 1232-1250. http://dx.doi.org/10.18823/asiatefl.2019.16.4.11.1232
250. Pham, V.P.H. (2021). The effects collaborative writing on students’ writing fluency: An efficient framework for collaborative writing. SAGE Open January-March 2021, 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244021998363
251. Pishkar, K., Moinzadeh, A., & Dabaghi, A. (2017). Modern English drama and the students' fluency and accuracy of speaking. English Language Teaching, 10(8), 69-77. http://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v10n8p69
252. Pochana, T. (2021). The effects of cooperative learning Techniques on Thai secondary School students’ reading comprehension [Unpublished Master thesis]. Mahasarakham University.
253. Prastyo, Y.D. (2017). Effects of cooperative learning on student teachers’ communicative competence in Indonesia [Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation]. University of Limerick.
254. Pratiwi, N. (2016). Project-based learning to enhance Junior High School students’ speaking skill and their motivation in learning the speaking skill [Unpublished Master’s thesis]. Sanata Dharma University.
255. Quincheula, L.G.A.J. (2019). Project based learning method to develop speaking skill in the students of eight level of San Felipe Neri School September 2018-January 2019 [Unpublished Master’s thesis]. Universidad Técnica de Ambato Dirección de Posgrado.
256. Rahman R, A. (2019). Application drama technique in developing speaking of the eleventh grade students of Man Majene. Edumaspul: Jurnal Pendidikan, 3(1), 8-14. https://doi.org/10.33487/edumaspul.v3i1.74
257. Rajabi, P., & Mashhadi, J. (2018, 5 July). The influence of collaborative learning strategy (CLS) on Iranian intermediate EFL learners’ reading comprehension[Oral Presentation]. Paper presented at 5th National Conference on Management & Humanistic Science Research in Research, Tehran University, Iran.
258. Riahi, Z., & Pourdana, N. (2017). Effective reading comprehension in EFL contexts: Individual and collaborative concept mapping strategies. Advances in Language and Literary Studies, 8(1), 51-59. http://dx.doi.org/10.7575/aiac.alls.v.8n.1p.51
259. Rostampour, M., Behjat, F., & Arvane, S. (2015). Collaborative or individualistic writing: Which one is a better venue to improve Iranian pre-university female students’ writing skill?. Modern Journal of Language Teaching Methods, 5 (3), 46-54. http://mjltm.org/browse.php?a_id=53&sid=1&slc_lang=en
260. Rustan, N. A. (2016). The effectiveness of project based learning to improve the speaking skill of the second semester students at Cokroaminoto Palopo University [Unpublished Undergraduate thesis]. Universitas Islam Negeri Alauddin Makassar.
261. Sabbah, S.S. (2016). The effect of jigsaw strategy on ESL students’ reading achievement. Arab World English Journal, 7(1), 445-458. https://dx.doi.org/10.24093/awej/vol7no1.27
262. Sadeghi, H., Biniaz, M., & Soleimani, H. (2016). The impact of project-based language learning on Iranian EFL learners’ comparison/contrast paragraph writing skills. International Journal of Asian Social Science, 6(9), 510-524. https://doi.org/10.18488/journal.1/2016.6.9/1.9.510.524
263. Safari, R. (2017). The influence of using sociodrama towards students’ pronunciation mastery at the second semester of the eighth grade at MTsN 3 South Lampung in the academic year of 2016/2017 [Unpublished Undergraduate thesis]. State Islamic University.
264. Sánchez, L.V.D.P.S. (2019). Project-based learning to develop the speaking skill in English [Unpublished Master’s thesis]. Universidad Técnica de Ambato Dirección de Posgrado.
265. Seng, G. H. (2007). The effects of think-aloud in a collaborative environment to improve comprehension of L2 texts. The Reading Matrix, 7(2), 29-45. http://www.readingmatrix.com/articles/seng/article.pdf
266. Shafaei, A., & Rahim, H.A. (2015). Does project based learning enhance Iranian EFL learners’ vocabulary recall and retention? Iranian Journal of Language Teaching Research 3(2), 83-99. https://doi.org/10.30466/IJLTR.2015.20391
267. Shafiee, S., & Khavaran, S.R. (2017). Effects of cooperative learning on vocabulary achievement of reflective/impulsive Iranian EFL learners. International Journal of Foreign Language Teaching & Research, 5(17), 11-24. http://jfl.iaun.ac.ir/article_588022_6c355319ba39946f03f6636227fc2da0.pdf
268. Shamsoddin, A., & Soltani, A. (2020). Improving reading comprehension and vocabulary knowledge through cooperative learning strategies: A case of nursing students at Zanjan Medical University. Preventive Care in Nursing & Midwifery Journal Zanjan University of Medical Science, 10 (1), 46-55. https://doi.org/10.52547/pcnm.10.1.46
269. Shana, Z., Lahiani, H., & Mahmoud, S. (2019). The effects of Kagan structures on UAE sixth grade students’ performance of reading comprehension: A pilot study. Education, 48 (8), 988-999. https://doi.org/10.1080/03004279.2019.1687555
270. Shehadeh, A. (2011). Effects and students perceptions of collaborative writing in L2. Journal of Second Language Writing, 20, 286-305. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2011.05.010
271. Shiraz, M.P., & Larsari, E.E. (2014). The effect of project-based activities on intermediate EFL students’ reading comprehension ability. The Journal of Effective Teaching, 14(3), 38-54. https://uncw.edu/jet/articles/vol14_3/poorverdi.pdf
272. Singaravelu, G. (2010). Impact of co-operative learning strategies in English. Journal on Educational Psychology, 4(2), 43-49. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1102270.pdf
273. Singay. (2020). An investigation into using Kagan cooperative learning model to enhance English oral communication ability of Bhutanese students. PASAA- A journal of Language Teaching and Learning, 59, 20-47. https://www.culi.chula.ac.th/Publicationsonline/files/article/8WO8PsH9v6Tue15019.pdf
274. Sirisrimangkorn, L., & Suwanthep, J. (2013). The effects of integrated drama-based role play and student teams achievement division (STAD) on students’ speaking skills and affective involvement. Scenario: Journal for Drama and Theatre in Foreign and Second Language Education, 2, 62-76. https://doi.org/10.33178/scenario.7.2.5
275. Soylu, B.A. (2008). İngilizce öğretiminde işbirlikli öğrenme yönteminin ilköğretim 6.sınıf öğrencilerinin akademik başarılarına etkisi (Tez No.220099). [Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Niğde Üniversitesi]. YÖK Ulusal Tez Merkezi.
276. Stinson, M., & Freebody, K. (2006) The DOL Project: the contributions of process drama to improved results in English oral communication. Youth Theatre Journal, 20(1), 27-41. https://doi.org/10.1080/08929092.2006.10012585
277. Sultana, M., & Zaki, S. (2015). Proposing project based learning as an alternative to traditional ELT pedagogy at public colleges in Pakistan. International Journal for Lesson and Learning Studies, 4 (2), 155-173. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJLLS-09-2013-0049
278. Susanti, A., Rofidah, N., Trisusana, A., & Retnaningdyah, P. (2020). Improving students’ writing skill through project based learning for EFL student. International Journal of English Linguistics, Literature, and Education, 2(2), 102-115. https://doi.org/10.32585/ijelle.v2i2.677
279. Tahmasebi, R., & Khodabakhshzadeh, H. (2017). Enhancing writing ability and self-regulation through teacher-led collaborative modeling. International Journal of Applied Linguistics & English Literature, 6(2), 239-248. http://dx.doi.org/10.7575/aiac.ijalel.v.6n.2p.239
280. Tamimi, R.I.S.,& Salamin, A.M.A. (2020). Effectiveness of project-based learning on students’ achievement and motivation toward English in an EFL environment. Hebron University Research Journal (B), 15 (2), 237-268. https://digitalcommons.aaru.edu.jo/hujr_b/vol15/iss2/10
281. Talebi, S.H., Maghsoudi, M., Mahmoudi, H., & Samadi, F. (2014). The interaction between Persian and English in enhancing Iranian EFL learners’ reading comprehension ability. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 98, 1866-1875. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.03.617
282. Talebi, F., & Sobhani, A. (2012). The impacts of cooperative learning on oral proficiency. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 3(3), 75-79. https://doi.org/10.5901/mjss.2012.v3n3p75
283. Tekeli, S.(2013). The effects of Cooperative learning on students’ writing performance (Thesis No.327980). [Master’s thesis, Çağ University]. Council of Higher Education Thesis Center.
284. Teng, M.F. (2021). The effectiveness of incorporating metacognitive prompts in collaborative writing on academic English writing skills. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 35 (3), 659– 673. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.3789
285. Terzier, C. (2012). The use of creative drama as an instructional strategy to enhance vocabulary of 7th and 8th grade students in primary schools (Tez No.331687). [Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Gazi Üniversitesi]. YÖK Ulusal Tez Merkezi.
286. Tesfamichael, W. (2016). Effects of implementing cooperative learning method (CLM) on eleventh graders’ paragraph writing. TESOL International Journal, 11(1). 81-95. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1251178.pdf
287. Thurston, A., Cockerill, M., & Craig, N. (2019). Using cooperative learning to close the reading attainment gap for students with low literacy levels for Grade8/Year 9 students. International Journal of Educational Research, 94, 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2019.02.016
288. Tsai, I.I. (2019). The effect of peer collaboration-based learning on enhancing English oral communication proficiency in MICE. Journal of Hospitality, Leisure, Sport & Tourism Education, 24, 38-49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhlste.2018.10.006
289. Tung, N.N. (2019, 24-25 May). An Evaluation of Project-Based Learning Designed to Increase Students’ English Speaking Fluency at HIU (Hong Bang International University). In Proceedings of the 7th OpenTESOL International Conference (pp. 239-257), Ho Chi Minh City University, Vietnam. http://ocs.ou.edu.vn/ffl/ojs/index.php?journal=OpenTESOL&page=article&op=view&path%5B%5D=7&path%5B%5D=17
290. Türker, M. (2007). Proje tabanlı öğrenmenin yabancı dil kullanımında konuşma yeterliliğine etkisinin değerlendirilmesi [Yayımlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi]. Ankara Üniversitesi.
291. Ugwu, E. O. (2019). Effect of student teams-achievement divisions and think–pair–share on students’ interest in reading comprehension. Journal of Educational Research and Practice, 9(1), 316-330. https://doi.org/10.5590/JERAP.2019.09.1.22
292. Uzer, F. (2008). Using drama in teaching English effectively (Tez No.218703). [Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Selçuk Üniversitesi]. YÖK Ulusal Tez Merkezi
293. Vaughn, S., Klinger, J.K., Swanson, E.A., Boardman, A.G., Roberts, G., Mohammed, S.S., & Stillman-Spisak, S.J. (2011). Efficacy of collaborative strategic reading with middle school students. American Educational Research Journal, 48 (4), 938-964. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831211410305
294. Wahyudin, A. Y. (2017). The effect of project-based learning on L2 spoken performance of undergraduate students in English for business class. Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research,82, 42-46. https://doi.org/10.2991/conaplin-16.2017.9
295. Wang, R.S. (2006). The effects of jigsaw cooperative learning on motivation to learn English at Chung-Wa Institute of Technology, Taiwan. Doctoral Dissertation, Florida International University, College of Education, Miami, Florida, USA.
296. Wardani, B. R., & Satriani, I. (2019). Collaborative learning and problem-based learning in teaching speaking. ANGLO-SAXON: Journal of the English Language Education Study Program, 10(2), 232-241. https://journal.unrika.ac.id/index.php/jurnalanglo-saxon/article/view/1980/pdf
297. Yakut, İ. (2020). Promoting the correct production of English sounds in extensive reading-circle classes: Explicit vs. implicit pronunciation training. Eurasian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 6 (1), 101-118. http://dx.doi.org/10.32601/ejal.710224
298. Yaman, İ. (2014). EFL students’ attitudes towards the development of speaking skills via project-based learning: An omnipresent learning perspective (Thesis No.356901). [Doctoral Dissertation, Gazi University]. Council of Higher Education Thesis Center.
299. Yang, D. (2016). Effects of project-based learning on speaking abilities of Non-English major Chinese students [Unpublished Master’s thesi]. Suranaree University of Technology.
300. Yang, A.S.V. (2005). Comparison of the effectiveness of cooperative learning and traditional teaching methods on Taiwanese College students’ oral performance and motivation toward learning [Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation]. La Sierra University.
301. Yavuz, Ö. (2017). İşbirliğine dayalı öğrenmenin İngilizce dersinde akademik başarıya, derse yönelik tutuma, yansıtıcı düşünme becerisine ve algılanan araçsalık düzeyine etkisi (Tez No.469126). [Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Bülent Ecevit Üniversitesi]. YÖK Ulusal Tez Merkezi.
302. Yıldız, F. (2009). The effects of project-based learning on student achievement in vocabulary learning on 6th grade students (Tez No.239355). [Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi]. YÖK Ulusal Tez Merkezi.
303. Yumurtacı, N. (2019). Using creative drama in teaching English to young learners: Effectiveness on vocabulary development and creative thinking (Thesis No.555074). [Master’s thesis, Bahçeşehir University]. Council of Higher Education Thesi Center.
304. Yurdabakan, İ., ve Cihanoğlu, M.O. (2009). Öz akran değerlendirmenin uygulandığı işbirlikli okuma ve kompozisyon tekniğinin başarı, tutum ve strateji kullanım düzeylerine etkisi. Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 11(4), 105-123. https://www.acarindex.com/dosyalar/makale/acarindex-1423876213.pdf
305. Zainuddin. (2015). The effect of cooperative integrated reading and composition technique on students’ reading descriptive text achievement. English Language Teaching, 8 (1), 11-21. http://dx.doi.org/10.5539/elt.v8n5p11
306. Zarifi, A., & Taghavi, A. (2016). The impact of cooperative learning on grammar learning among Iranian intermediate EFL learners. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 6 (7), 1429-1436. http://dx.doi.org/10.17507/tpls.0607