Volume: 25 Issue: 2 , 12/25/25

Year: 2025

Research Article

Research Article

6. Sovyet Devri Tatar Edebiyatında Köy Nesri

Book Review

Born in 1982 in Izmir, he has been affiliated with Ege University since 2006.

His research interests include the history of the Russian Empire and Soviet Russia, as well as Orientalism, colonialism, travel literature, and urban history.

Late Modern Mediterranean History, Late Modern Asian History, Late Modern European History, Late Modern Urban History, Late Modern Discoveries and Colonialism History, Late Modern Russian History, Late Modern Renewal History
Seçil Öraz Beşikçi
Res. Assist. Dr. Seçil ÖRAZ BEŞİKÇİ EGE ÜNİVERSİTESİ, TÜRK DÜNYASI ARAŞTIRMALARI ENSTİTÜSÜ
Political Science, European Studies, Studies of the Turkic World, International Relations Theories
Şima Doğan
Res. Assist. Dr. Şima DOĞAN EGE ÜNİVERSİTESİ, TÜRK DÜNYASI ARAŞTIRMALARI ENSTİTÜSÜ, TÜRK DÜNYASI EDEBİYATI ANABİLİM DALI Web
North-East (Altai, Khakas, Tuva, Sakha/Yakut) Turkic Dialects and Literatures
Ali Balcı
Res. Assist. Dr. Ali BALCI EGE ÜNİVERSİTESİ, TÜRK DÜNYASI ARAŞTIRMALARI ENSTİTÜSÜ Web
Artificial Intelligence (Other), Cinema Sociology, Cinema Theories, Cinema Studies (Other), General Turkish History, Late Modern Russian History, Cinema History
Gökçe Emeç Yücesoy
Res. Assist. Gökçe EMEÇ YÜCESOY EGE ÜNİVERSİTESİ, TÜRK DÜNYASI ARAŞTIRMALARI ENSTİTÜSÜ
Turkish Folklore Outside Türkiye, Turkish Folklore in the Türkiye Field, Turkish Folklore (Other)
Nagihan Baysal Yurdakul
Assoc. Prof. Dr. Nagihan BAYSAL YURDAKUL EGE ÜNİVERSİTESİ, TÜRK DÜNYASI ARAŞTIRMALARI ENSTİTÜSÜ
Turkish Folklore, Turkish Folklore Outside Türkiye, Turkish Folklore in the Türkiye Field

Definition
The Journal of Turkish World Studies is an open-access publication of Ege University Institute of Turkish World Studies, which covers studies in the field of humanities, arts and social sciences related to Turkic peoples, is published twice a year in Summer and Winter periods, uses the blind refereeing method in the scientific control process, and accepts articles written in Turkish and other Turkish dialects, English and Russian.

Objective
The Journal of Turkish World Studies strives to publish studies that will contribute to the accumulation of scientific knowledge in the fields of social sciences, arts, and humanities related to Turkic peoples, revise the existing accumulation, deepen the problematics, make the studies in this field visible and prepare the fields of dissemination. In particular, it aims to create a discussion ground for studies on historical and spatial continuity and ruptures among Turkic peoples.

Scope
The Journal of Turkish World Studies publishes research, case presentation, compilation, publication from thesis, translation, transfer, book review and necrology type studies in the fields of social sciences, arts and humanities related to Turkic peoples; reviews on scientific publications in this field and studies on teaching Turkish to foreigners. 

EGE UNIVERSITY
THE JOURNAL OF TURKISH WORLD STUDIES
AUTHOR GUIDELINES

Language
Articles are published in Turkish, Turkic dialects, English, and Russian. Each submitted manuscript must include an abstract in both the article’s original language and in English.
Manuscript Preparation and Submission
Manuscripts must be submitted exclusively through the journal's online submission and evaluation platform, accessible at https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/egetdid. Submissions sent via e-mail or other channels are not considered for evaluation.
Authors are required to upload the signed Copyright Agreement and Corresponding Author Statement Form during the initial submission phase via the online system.
Manuscripts should not exceed 8,000 words in total, including tables, appendices, and footnotes. Abstracts, keywords, and the bibliography are excluded from this limit. Submissions exceeding 8,500 words will be returned without evaluation.
All manuscripts must be prepared using a word processor compatible with MS Word, on A4-sized pages. The main text should be typed in Times New Roman font, size 11 pt, with single line spacing and 2.5 cm margins on all sides. Footnotes should be written in 9 pt font, with 0.6 cm indentation and justified alignment.
For manuscripts written in Turkish, spelling and grammar must conform to the Turkish Language Association (TDK) guidelines.
The article title must be center-aligned, in 11 pt bold font, with only the first letters capitalized. The title must not exceed 12 words. If the article is written in Turkish, the English title should be italicized and placed directly below the Turkish one. Section headings should be left-aligned, bold, and numbered (e.g., 1., 2.1., 2.2.1.) throughout, excluding Introduction, Conclusion, Appendices, and Bibliography. In cases where the article is derived from a previous work (such as a project, thesis, or book), this must be indicated in a footnote (*) based on the article title. Example: This article is derived from the ongoing/defended doctoral dissertation titled “...” prepared at Ege University, Institute of Social Sciences, Department of Turkish History.
Quotations exceeding five lines should be indented 0.6 cm from the left, written in italics and placed within quotation marks. Shorter quotations should be embedded in the main text in italics and quotation marks. Italics may also be used for emphasis.
Footnotes
Footnotes must be formatted in Times New Roman, 9 pt font, with single spacing and justified alignment. Each paragraph should begin with a 0.6 cm indentation. One space should follow all punctuation marks, and each footnote must end with a full stop.
In-text citations should not be used; instead, all references must appear as footnotes numbered sequentially from 1 onward. Book and journal titles in footnotes should be italicized, while article titles should be placed in double quotation marks.
At first mention, full bibliographic information must be provided. Subsequent references may include only the author's surname followed by a standard abbreviation (e.g., op. cit., ibid.). If citing multiple works by the same author, abbreviate titles accordingly after the initial full citation.
In multi-authored works, all authors should be listed upon first reference. In subsequent citations, abbreviations may be used.
When referencing an entire article, book chapter, or encyclopedia entry, inclusive page numbers should be indicated.
Abstract
Research articles must include an abstract of 150–200 words in both the article’s original language and in English. The abstract (in both Turkish and English) must not include citations, references, figures, tables, etc. The Turkish summary (özet) and the English abstract must be identical in content and written in 9-point Times New Roman font, with 1 cm indentation from both the left and right margins. For articles written in Turkish, an English translation of the abstract must be provided. For articles written in other Turkic dialects (outside of Turkey Turkish), in English, or in Russian, abstracts must be provided in Turkish, English, and the third language in which the article is written.
Keywords
In accordance with the language and dialect requirements specified for the abstract, keywords consisting of a minimum of five and a maximum of eight words must be provided below both the Turkish summary (özet) and the English abstract, taking into account the terminology of the relevant academic field.
Extended Summary
For articles written in Turkish, in Turkic dialects other than Turkey Turkish, or in Russian that are to be published in the Journal of Turkish World Studies, an extended summary in English will also be required. However, articles written in English do not need to include an extended summary.
The extended summary is not required at the time of the article’s initial submission. It will be requested from the authors after the article has been accepted for publication. However, authors who wish to do so may include the extended summary at the end of their manuscript during the initial submission.
The extended summary should preferably be between 600 and 800 words in length. It must clearly present the purpose, problem, methodology, findings, and conclusions of the study under appropriate headings. The subheadings used within the extended summary may vary depending on the nature of the research. No findings or results that are not already included in the main article should appear in the extended summary.
Manuscript Types
Research Articles: These must present original research findings and contribute new knowledge to the field. The structure of the main text should follow a logical academic format.
Translated Articles: In order for a translated article to be considered for review, the original work must have received a certain number of citations (at least 5) in its original language. The translated version may only be published with written permission from both the original author and the publisher (book, journal, etc.). To publish the translation in the Journal of Turkish World Studies, a signed letter of permission must be obtained and uploaded to the submission system in .pdf format. This permission must also be noted in the first footnote of the article. All copyright-related costs are the responsibility of the translator. In addition, the original version of the translated article must be shared with the journal editors in .pdf format. If 70 years have passed since the death of the original author, no permission letter is required. Example footnote: This article is a translation of the work titled “xxx xxx,” written by xxx xxx, originally published in [Journal Name, Volume/Issue (Year), page range], and is published here with the permission of the author and the publisher (xxx Publishing House). The citation style, in-text notes, and references in the translated article must be revised to conform to the APA 7 citation format. An asterisk (*) should be added after the original author’s name, and—if applicable—the author’s academic title, institution/university, city, country, and department/discipline should be included. Similar information about the translator should be provided with a double asterisk (**). The editorial board has decided that no more than two translated articles will be published in a single issue. Any translations exceeding this limit will be postponed to the following issue.
Book Reviews: Articles that review books must present original and detailed information about the publication under review. Books must have been published within the past two years if published in Turkish within Turkey, or within the past three years if published abroad in a different language. The review article should not exceed 2,500 words. Submissions that resemble advertisements, provide only a brief summary of the publication, fail to highlight its significant contributions or shortcomings, or do not include an objective evaluation in line with academic standards will not be considered for publication.
Tables
Tables must be numbered consecutively according to their appearance in the text and placed at the end of the manuscript, following the references. Each table must include a descriptive title above and explanations of any abbreviations used below. Tables should be formatted using the table function in a word processor and not duplicated from the main text but used to support it.
Figures and Figure Legends
Figures, graphics, and photographs must be uploaded separately via the submission system in high-resolution (minimum 300 DPI) TIFF or JPEG formats. They should not be embedded in the manuscript file. Each subfigure must be uploaded separately; composite images are not accepted. Any identifying information must be removed to ensure anonymization. Figure legends must be listed at the end of the main document.
Acronyms and Abbreviations
All acronyms and abbreviations must be defined at their first use in both the abstract and the main text. The abbreviation should be placed in parentheses following the full term.
References and Citation
All references, tables, and figures must be cited in the main text and numbered in the order in which they appear. APA 7 style should be followed for citations and reference formatting.
Limitations
Limitations and weaknesses of the study must be clearly discussed in a dedicated section prior to the conclusion paragraph.
Revisions
Revised manuscripts must highlight all changes made in response to reviewer comments. Revised submissions should be returned within 30 days of the editorial decision. Failure to meet this deadline may result in rejection. If an extension is required, authors must request it before the deadline.
Once accepted, manuscripts undergo copy-editing for grammar, punctuation, and formatting. Final proofs are sent to the corresponding author, who is expected to approve them within 2 days. Articles are published online as “ahead of print” until assigned to an issue.
References
When citing sources, authors should prioritize the most recent and relevant literature. They are also fully responsible for the accuracy and completeness of all references. Reference formatting must strictly follow the guidelines and examples outlined in the journal’s writing rules.
Submitted manuscripts should be prepared in the American Psychological Association 7 (APA 7) style in terms of reference system, citation format and bibliography, and references should be prepared as internal notes instead of footnote system. In the references given in the text, the surname of the author, year of publication and page number will be given as follows.:

In-text Citation
In direct quotations, if the quotation is less than 40 words, enclose it in double quotation marks:
“Dönüşüm kavramı zihindeki bir bilginin çeşitli işlemlerden geçilerek sunulmasını içerir” (Kerimoğlu, 2016, s. 77).
For direct quotations of 40 or more words, indent 0.6 cm from the left in blocks without quotation marks:
Birinci ve ikinci tarzdaki bildirme ifadelerinde fiil kullanılmadığı için bunların birleşik fiil ile karışmasından bahsedilemez. Bildirmenin üçüncü şekli olarak verdiğimiz örneklerde er-, tur-, bol- fiilleri cümle ile ilgili bir iş görmüşler; cümlenin kuruluşunda vazife almışlardır. O halde bu kullanılışları, birleşik fiil içinde mütalaa etmemek lazımdır (Ercilasun, 2014, s. 75).
If the Author’s Name is in the Text
If the author’s name is mentioned in the text, the date is given in parentheses after the author’s name. The page number is written after the quoted sentence:
Ahmet B. Ercilasun (2010), “Eski Oğuz Türkçesinin en önemli ses özelliği, küçük ünlü uyumunun mevcut olmayışıdır” (s. 459).
If the Author Name is not mentioned in the text
If the author's name is not mentioned in the text, the reference should be provided in parentheses, including the author’s surname, the year of publication, and the page number, in that order:
“Eski Oğuz Türkçesinin en önemli ses özelliği, küçük ünlü uyumunun mevcut olmayışıdır” (Ercilasun, 2010, s. 459).
Anonymous Study
If the author of the cited study is not known, the name of the study is written. If the name of the study is given in the text, it should be italicized. If the name of the study is long, it is abbreviated in the in-text citation.
Diğer bir kaynakta (Dünyada Memurlar ve Sendika, 1996, s. 55) da belirtildiği gibi…
The author’s name can also be accepted as “Anonymous” in works with unknown authors. In this case, “Anonymous” can be also used in the bibliography.
Diğer bir kaynakta (Anonim, 1996, s. 55)’da belirtildiği gibi…
If a general reference is made in the text
If a general reference is made to a work without quoting a specific passage, only the author's surname and the year of publication should be included in parentheses:
Gramerleşme, gramatikal yapıların süreç içerisinde nasıl ortaya çıktıklarını göstermektedir (Gökçe, 2013).
Multiple Studies by the Same Author
If multiple works by the same author are cited, the publication year and page number of each work must be specified:
Ahmet B. Ercilasun, Bengü taşların, Köktürklerin ikinci döneminden kalmış olan yazılı anıtlar olduğunu (2016, s. 339), bu yazıtlardan da Çoyr yazıtının tarihi bilinen en eski Türk yazıtı olduğunu belirtmektedir (2010, s. 128).
Different Works by the Author in the Same Year
When referring to more than one work of the author published in the same year, phrases such as “a, b, c” should be placed after the publication date.
Oğuz boylarının her birinin özgün ağız özelliklerini belirleyebilmenin bugün çok daha zordur (Gülsevin, 2010a, s. 1077).
Study with Two Authors
If the author’s name is mentioned in the text:
Doğan ve Koç, Kazak Türkçesinde 9 adet ünlü bulunduğunu belirtir (2013, s. 18).
If the author’s name is not mentioned in the text:
“Kazak Türkçesinde 9 adet ünlü bulunmaktadır” (Doğan ve Koç, 2013, s. 18).
Study with Multiple Authors
In studies with two authors, the surname of both authors is given:
(Doğan ve Koç, 2013, s. 44).
In studies with three or more authors, it should be indicated as “surname of the first author and et al.”:
(Ali ve ark., 2017, s. 65).
Indirect/Secondary Quotations
If an indirect citation is to be made, the original source person is written in the text; the secondary source person is indicated in parentheses.
Salsalname’yi Gülşehrî’den önce de birisinin yazmış olduğu düşünülmektedir (Köprülü, 1991’den aktaran Ercilasun, 2010, s. 439).
Multiple Studies
If more than one study is cited: They are given in alphabetical order of the surnames of the authors, separated by a dotted vigula:
(Dilaçar, 2016, s. 30; Güner, 2021, s. 45; Kerimoğlu, 2015, s. 90).
Corporate Author
The institution conducting the study is indicated: (Türk Dil Kurumu, 2011, s. 65). If the name of the institution is to be abbreviated, it should also be abbreviated in the text:
(TDK, 2011, p. 65).
Authors with the Same Surname
When citing multiple authors with the same surname, the author's initial and surname are written together, followed by the year of publication and the page number.
Türk destanlarında aile algısında ad verme ve ad biliminde ad verme…
(H. İ. Şahin, 2012, s. 118; İ. Şahin, 2015, s. 45).
Hardcover Study
Page number and date are indicated. Only the cited volume is written:
Hümâ was also the epitome of beauty (Ögel, 2014, s. 123).
In multi-volume works:
In multi-volume publications, the years in which the volumes were published are written as a range:
(Pflanze, 1963-1990).
Reprint/Publication of a Previous Edition
For reprinted and republished works, both dates should be given in the in-text citation. It should be ordered as year of first publication / year of republication: (Ercilasun, 1984/2014, s. 35).
Anthology Work
When citing a work included in an anthology, the title of the work and the year of publication in parentheses are provided directly, rather than the name of the editor or the anthology:
Güneydeki yoksulluk Hurston’un otobiyografisi olan “Karayolundaki Toz İzleri” (1982)’nde ele alınmaktadır.
Encyclopedias
(Balkans: History, 1987).
Dictionaries
(Develioğlu, 2013, s. 45).
Electronic Texts
Video or Movie
(Name of the movie, year) (Deli ve Dahi, 2019).
When referring to any hour, minute or second of a video or movie, it is given as: (00:02:15-00:02:35)
Podcast/ YouTube
If there is video/podcast author name, title, recording date, it should be indicated. When it is desired to be referenced in hours, minutes, seconds, it should be given as follows: (00:02:15 00:02:35).
Orçun Madran “BBY 262 Web tasarımı dersi uygulaması” (2015)’nda web sayfası tasarımının nasıl olacağı ile ilgili bilgi vermektedir. (Tunç, 2020).
Lecture/Panel/Conference
Teplin ve ark. tarafından Psikoloji-Hukuk, Toplum Toplantısı (2005)’nda gençlerde karşılaşılan şiddet eğilimi ve intihar oranları ele alınmaktadır.
Other Sources
Newspaper

Ali Yüksel çocuk gelinlerin sayısındaki artışın çok yüksek oranlara ulaştığını dile getiriyor (Cumhuriyet, 2014).
For detailed information on in-text citations:
https://apastyle.apa.org/style-grammar-guidelines/citations

Preparation of Bibliography
The bibliography should start on a new page and should be organized in alphabetical order according to the surnames of the authors or the titles of the sources whose authors are unknown.
When indicating the publishing houses that published the works in the bibliography, words such as publishing house and publishing should not be used. Imge, not Imge Publishing House.
If more than one publishing house is indicated, all should be indicated by placing a semicolon between them.
Page numbers should be fully indicated in the articles.
Basic format: Author’s Surname, Initial (Date of Publication). Title of the Book. Publisher/Publishing House.
Ögel, B. (2001). Dünden bugüne Türk kültürünün gelişme çağları. Türk Dünyası Araştırmaları Vakfı.
Single Author Book
Togan, Z. V. (1981). Umumi Türk tarihine giriş. Enderun.
Multi-author Book
Yakıcı, A., Yücel, M., Doğan, M. ve Yelok, V. S. (2017). Üniversiteler için Türkçe- 1 yazılı anlatım. Yargı.
Two or More Works by the Same Author:
Sorted by year.
İnan, A. (1954). Tarihte ve bugün şamanizm materyaller ve araştırmalar. TTK.
İnan, A. (1976). Eski Türk dini tarihi. Kültür Bakanlığı.
Two Works by the Same Author Published in the Same Year
İnan, A. (1976a). Eski Türk dini tarihi. Kültür Bakanlığı.
İnan, A. (1976b). Tarihte ve bugün şamanizm materyaller ve araştırmalar. TTK.
Book with DOI number
Çakıcı, A. (2020). DEHB ve alternatif tedavi türleri. Pegem Akademi. https://doi.org/10.14527/9786257228138
Anonymous Book
If the author is unknown, the title of the work is given.
Manas (1995). TIKA.
Translation Book
Ligeti, L. (1986). Bilinmeyen iç Asya. (Sadrettin Karatay, Çev.). TDK.
Translation Article
Erdurucan, S. M. (2020). Tarihin suret-i tedrisi (S. N. Erdurucan, Çev.). Türk Tarih Eğitimi Dergisi, 9(2), 647-664). https://doi.org/10.17497/tuhed.785963 (Çalışmanın ilk yayımı 1910’da yapılmıştır)
Edited Book
Ekşi, H. ve Yüksel, M. (Ed.). (2018). Rehberlik ve psikolojik danışma. Nobel.
Chapter in an Edited Book
Maden, A. (2021). Yazma eğitiminde bellek ve özellikleri. M. N. Kardaş (Ed.), Yazma eğitimi içinde (2. bs., s. 83-100). Pegem Akademi. https://doi.org/10.14527/9786257676335
Book with Multiple Editions
Kafesoğlu, İ. (2016). Türk Millî Kültürü (40. bs.). Ötüken.
Electronic Printed Book Only
O’Keefe, E. (t.y.). Egoism & the cnsts in Western values. http://www.onlineoriginals.com/showitem.asp litem I 135
Electronic Version of the Book
Moran, B. (2015). Türk romanına eleştirel bir bakış 3. https://books.google.com.tr/books?id=p38wDwAAQBAJ&printsec=frontcover&dq=bilge+karasu&hl=tr&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwi8qZLz9KThAhWl0KYKHZ2FBI0Q6AEILjAB#v=onepage&q=bilge%20karasu&f=false
Web page on a website with an access date
Türk Psikologlar Derneği. (t.y.). Klinik Psikoloji Diploma Tescili Süreç Takibi. 17 Şubat 2020’de https://www.psikolog.org.tr/tr/haberler/www/klinik-psikoloji-diploma-tescili-surec-takibi-x176/ adresinden edinilmiştir.
Electronic Articles
Karadağ, E. (2020). Kalitenin standardını belirlemek: Türk üniversite sıralama sistemlerinin Berlin prensiplerine göre incelenmesi. Yükseköğretim Dergisi, 10(3). 260-268. doi:10.2399/yod.19.020000
Electronic News Articles
Arat, Ş. (2013, 13 Mart). En iyi 120 liseliye üniversite hayatları boyunca yarım burs. Hürriyet. https://www.hurriyet.com.tr/egitim/en-iyi-120-liseliye-universite-hayatlari-boyunca-yarim-burs-22852138
Multi-Volume Studies
Pflanze, O. (1963-1990). Bismarc and the development of Germany (Cilt 1-3). Princeton University Press.
Chapter in a Volume of a Multi-Volume Work
Bozanoğlu, S. (2014). Akademik güdülenme destek programı. S. Erkan ve A. Kaya (Ed.), Deneysel olarak sınanmış grupla psikolojik danışma ve rehberlik programlar: C. 3. (5. Bs., s. 1-58). Nobel.
New Edition of a Previous Edition
Frazer, James G. (2004). Altın dal dinin ve folklorun kökleri 1. Payel. (Orijinal çalışma 1991 yılında yayımlanmıştır)
Single Authored Article in a Scientific Journal
İnan, A. (1959). Manas destanı üzerine notlar. Belleten, 8(7), 125-159.
Multi-authored Article in a Scientific Journal
Malatyalı, M. K. Ve Sunal, A. B. (2020). Evli çiftlerde bağlanma boyutları ile evlilik doyumu arasındaki ilişkide evlilik gücünün aracı rolü. Türk Psikoloji Dergisi, 35(85), 65-78. https://doi.org/10.31828/tpd1300443320181219m000016
Electronic Journal Article
Arslan, A. (2014). Atatürk Döneminde Romanya’dan Türk Göçleri ve Göçmenlerin Türkiye’de İskanları. Turkish Studies, 9 (4). http://dx.doi.org/10.7827/TurkishStudies.6813
Newspaper and Magazine Articles with Identified Authors
Özbaşaran, N. (2008, 4 Kasım). Küresel iklim savaşçıları: Solucanlar. Bilim ve Teknik.
Unpublished Theses, Posters, Proceedings
Boyalı, C. (2020). Öz-kontrol ile akademik erteleme arasındaki ilişkide akıllı telefon bağımlılığının aracı rolünün incelenmesi [Yayımlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi]. Marmara Üniversitesi.
If master’s and doctoral theses are included in a database;
Karadağ, E. (2009). Türkiye’de eğitim bilimleri alanında yapılmış doktora tezlerinin tematik ve metodolojik açıdan incelenmesi: Bir durum çalışması (Tez No. 250896) [Doktora tezi, Marmara Üniversitesi]. Yükseköğretim Kurulu Ulusal Tez Merkezi.
Atılgan, B., Tuncel, B. ve Turan, S. (2020, 12-14 Ekim). “Hekimliği öğreniyorum” programının tıp fakültesi öğrencilerinin üniversite yaşamı uyumuna etkisi [Poster sunumu]. Ulusal Tıp Eğitimi Kongresi, İstanbul, Türkiye. https://cutt.ly/ek2mNZg
Alpaydın, Y. (2019, 10-12 Ekim). Yükseköğretim mezunlarının istihdam edilebilirliğini artırmada kullanılacak politika araçları için gerekli olan veri ihtiyacının değerlendirilmesi [Bildiri sunumu]. 4. Uluslararası Yükseköğretim Çalışmaları Konferansı, Çanakkale, Türkiye.
Encyclopedia
Zalta, E. N. (Ed.). (2019). The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy (Summer 2019 ed.). Stanford University. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2019/
Dictionaries
Türk Dil Kurumu. (t.y.). Güncel Türkçe sözlük. 15 Şubat, 2021 tarihinde https://sozluk.gov.tr/ adresinden edinilmiştir.
Report of a Government Agency or Other Organization
Strateji Geliştirme Başkanlığı. (2009). Kamuda verimli aydınlatmaya geçiş raporu (Yayım No. 2009-19). T.C. Enerji ve Tabii Kaynaklar Bakanlığı. http://www.enerji.gov.tr/yayinlar_raporşar/KVAG_Raporu.pdf
News Article
Güçlü, A. (2013, 2 Şubat). Matematik ve fen eğitiminin analizi yapıldı. Milliyet, s. 17.
Movie/Series
Ceylan, N. B. (Yönetmen). (2018). Ahlat ağacı [Film]. Zeynofilm; Memento Films Production.
Güven, B. (Yapımcı). (2007-2011). Arka sıradakiler [Televizyon dizisi]. MinT Prodüksiyon; Best Prodüksiyon.
For detailed information on citations in the bibliography:
https://apastyle.apa.org/style-grammar-guidelines/references/examples

EGE UNIVERSITY
THE JOURNAL OF TURKISH WORLD STUDIES
ETHICAL PRINCIPLES AND PUBLICATION POLICIES

PUBLICATION POLICY
The Journal of Turkish World Studies adheres to the highest standards of publication ethics and fully embraces the Principles of Transparency and Best Practice in Scholarly Publishing, as jointly established by the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE), the Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ), the Open Access Scholarly Publishers Association (OASPA), and the World Association of Medical Editors (WAME), accessible at https://publicationethics.org/resources/guidelines-new/principles-transparency-and-best-practice-scholarly-publishing.
Manuscripts submitted for consideration must be aligned with the stated aims and scope of the Journal of Turkish World Studies. Only those submissions that have been approved by all listed authors, have not been previously published, and are not currently under review by another journal will be considered for peer review.
Any request to amend the authorship of a submitted manuscript, including the addition, removal, or reordering of authors, must be supported by a signed written consent from all previously listed authors.
The Journal of Turkish World Studies assigns a Digital Object Identifier (DOI) to all published articles. DOIs are provided through the DergiPark platform to ensure permanent and reliable digital accessibility of articles. Each article receives a unique DOI number upon publication, which is clearly indicated on the article page.
Acts such as plagiarism, duplicate publication, false authorship or denial of rightful authorship, fabrication or falsification of data, “salami slicing” or redundant publication, infringement of copyright, and failure to disclose conflicts of interest are deemed unethical. Manuscripts found to violate ethical standards will be retracted or withdrawn from the publication process. This policy also applies to any form of misconduct identified after the article has been published.
Plagiarism
All submissions that pass preliminary editorial screening are subject to plagiarism detection through the iThenticate software. In cases where plagiarism or self-plagiarism is identified, the authors will be duly notified. Editors reserve the right to resubmit the manuscript for plagiarism review at any stage of peer review or production if deemed necessary. Manuscripts exhibiting high similarity indices may be rejected, regardless of whether such similarity is detected before or after acceptance. Generally, depending on the article type and the distribution of similarity across sources, the total similarity score should not exceed 20%.
Double-Blind Peer Review
Following the plagiarism screening, manuscripts that meet the journal’s formal requirements are evaluated by the editors-in-chief in terms of originality, methodological rigor, scholarly significance, and alignment with the journal’s scope. Submissions deemed suitable are subjected to a double-blind peer-review process involving at least two national or international experts in the relevant field. Manuscripts may be accepted for publication upon necessary revisions made in accordance with the reviewers’ recommendations.
Please note: The Journal of Turkish World Studies exclusively accepts submissions from doctoral candidates and Ph.D. graduates. Submissions from undergraduate or master’s level students, as well as those who have completed these programs, are not considered for publication.
Authors may submit a subsequent article only after a period of two years (four issues) following the publication of their first article in the Journal.
Open Access Statement
The Journal of Turkish World Studies is an open access publication, and all content is made available to users and their affiliated institutions free of charge. In accordance with the principles of the Budapest Open Access Initiative (BOAI), users are permitted to read, download, copy, print, search, or provide links to the full texts of articles published in the Journal without seeking prior authorization from either the publisher or the authors, provided such use is not for commercial purposes.
Each article is assigned a Digital Object Identifier (DOI) through the DergiPark platform to ensure the permanent accessibility of articles in the journal and compliance with international standards. DOI numbers enable articles to be easily found and cited in the digital environment.
All open access articles published in the Journal are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0) license.
Article Processing Charge
All financial expenses associated with the Journal are fully covered by Ege University. Accordingly, no fees are charged to authors at any stage of the publication process. The Journal does not impose any article processing charges (APCs) or submission fees for manuscripts submitted, accepted, or published.
Copyright Notice
Authors who publish with the Journal retain the copyright to their work, which is licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/). By submitting their work, authors grant the Publisher a non-exclusive right to publish the work for non-commercial purposes. The CC BY-NC 4.0 license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided that the use is non-commercial in nature and the original work is properly cited.
Corrections, Retractions, and Expressions of Concern
The Editor may issue a correction if minor errors are identified in a published article, provided such errors do not affect the study’s results, interpretations, or conclusions. In cases where major errors or misconduct that compromise the validity of the findings are detected, the Editor may consider retracting the article.
An expression of concern may be issued when there is credible evidence of potential research or publication misconduct; where the reliability of the findings is in question; and when the authors’ affiliated institutions fail to conduct an investigation, or the outcome of such an investigation appears to be inconclusive, biased, or unfair.
The Journal adheres to the guidelines established by the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) and the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) concerning corrections, retractions, and expressions of concern.
Retraction
In cases requiring retraction, the Journal follows the Retraction Guidelines issued by COPE.
The Editor reserves the right to retract a published article under the following circumstances:
  • There is clear evidence that the findings are unreliable, whether due to major error (e.g., miscalculation or experimental mistake), fabrication (e.g., falsified data), or manipulation (e.g., image alteration).
  • The article contains plagiarized content.
  • The work has been published elsewhere without appropriate citation or acknowledgment.
  • The article includes data or material used without proper authorization.
  • Copyright infringement or other serious legal issues are present.
  • The research described is found to be unethical.
  • The peer-review process was compromised or manipulated.
  • The author(s) failed to disclose a significant conflict of interest that, in the Editor’s judgment, would have materially influenced the interpretation of the work or the editorial and peer-review process.
In the event of a retraction, the following procedures will be followed:
  • A retraction notice, including the title of the article, will be published in a subsequent issue of the Journal. This notice will be paginated and included in the table of contents.
  • A hyperlink will be established between the retraction notice and the original article in the electronic version.
  • In the online version, a retraction notice page will precede the original article, informing readers of the retraction.
  • The original article will remain accessible, but a watermark stating “Retracted” will be added to each page of the PDF version.
Article Removal for Legal Reasons
In exceptional circumstances, where legal risks are involved, the full text of an article may be removed and replaced with a statement of removal. In such cases, only the article’s metadata (title and authorship) will be retained.
Article removal may occur under the following conditions:
  • The article is determined to be defamatory or to infringe the legal rights of third parties, and retraction is considered insufficient.
  • The article is subject to a court order or is reasonably anticipated to become the subject of legal proceedings.
  • There exists a substantial and immediate risk to public health.
Archiving Policy
To ensure the long-term preservation and permanent accessibility of all articles published in the Journal, all content is archived on DergiPark, which functions as a national digital repository. Additionally, DergiPark supports the LOCKSS (Lots of Copies Keep Stuff Safe) system, enabling the distributed collection, preservation, and dissemination of the Journal’s content.
Authors are also encouraged to self-archive the final published PDF version of their articles in open-access digital repositories that comply with the standards of the Open Archives Initiative (https://www.openarchives.org/). When depositing their work, authors are expected to include a link directing readers to the official version of the article on the journal website.
ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE POLICY
In light of recent advancements in artificial intelligence (AI) and evolving practices in scholarly publishing, the Artificial Intelligence Policy establishes the editorial and ethical standards that authors, reviewers, and editors are expected to uphold when utilizing such technologies.
The formulation of this policy has taken into account the following authoritative sources:
AI-assisted technologies—including but not limited to large language models (LLMs), chatbots, image generators, and synthetic data generators—are capable of producing diverse forms of content such as text, images, audio, and data. When applied ethically and under human supervision, these tools can enhance productivity and foster scholarly innovation. However, their unsupervised use presents substantial risks, including the generation of inaccurate or biased content, citation errors or omissions, potential breaches of privacy and intellectual property rights, and violations of authorship and publishing rights.
In order to mitigate these risks, the Journal adopts the following core principles regarding the use of AI in scholarly work:
  • The use of any AI tool in the creation of content—whether text, figures, images, or code—must be fully disclosed and clearly detailed in the appropriate section of the manuscript (e.g., the acknowledgements or methods section).
  • AI tools shall not be credited as authors under any circumstances.
  • Authors bear full responsibility for the accuracy, originality, and integrity of their work, regardless of whether AI technologies have been utilized. This includes the proper citation and attribution of any third-party ideas, data, language, or other intellectual contributions.
  • Reviewers and editors are strictly prohibited from uploading any portion of submitted manuscripts to generative AI platforms or tools.
  • The Journal editorial workflows may employ tools specifically designed to detect AI-generated content, thereby supporting the integrity of the review and publication processes.
Notwithstanding the above, the use of AI tools aimed at improving readability, language clarity, and grammatical correctness is permitted, provided such tools are employed under the supervision of authors and/or editors and do not compromise academic rigor or ethical standards.

For Authors
  • Such disclosure must be made both in the cover letter accompanying the submission and within the manuscript itself. This may take the form of a footnote and/or a statement within the methods section, clearly indicating which AI tool was used, the version employed, and the specific purpose for which it was applied.
  • In addition, authors must describe the manner in which the AI tool was utilized, how the validity of the AI-generated results was evaluated, and which parts of the manuscript—including the main content, data, or supplementary files—were influenced or generated by AI technologies.
  • The responsibility for ensuring the accuracy, validity, and appropriateness of all content, including citations produced with the assistance of AI tools, lies solely with the authors. Authors must rigorously check for and correct any potential errors, inconsistencies, or biases that may arise from such use.
  • Moreover, authors are expected to verify all original sources in order to eliminate the risk of plagiarism, acknowledging that AI-generated content may inadvertently contain plagiarized material. They must confirm that all referenced sources have been thoroughly reviewed and are original.
  • AI-assisted tools (e.g., ChatGPT, DeepSeek, Gemini, Grok) shall not be listed as authors under any circumstance, as they cannot assume responsibility for the accuracy, integrity, or originality of scholarly work. These attributes are essential components of authorship. Consequently, all content created with the assistance of AI remains the full responsibility of the named authors. Authors must ensure that all hypotheses, interpretations, conclusions, limitations, and implications stated within the manuscript reflect their own scholarly judgment and not that of any AI system.
  • The use of AI tools in ways that supplant the essential duties of researchers and authors violates fundamental principles of scientific publishing and research ethics. Accordingly, submissions involving any of the following practices are deemed unethical and will not be accepted for publication:
    • Generating text or code without subsequent critical review and revision by the author;
    • Employing synthetic data to substitute for missing data without the application of a robust and transparent methodology;
    • Creating inaccurate or artificially generated content, including abstracts or supplementary materials;
    • Manipulating images or figures—including but not limited to pictures, graphs, tables, medical images, snippets, computer code, or formulae—or modifying original research data through AI (e.g., by enhancing, obscuring, relocating, removing, or inserting features within an image or figure).
For Peer Reviewers
The confidentiality of the peer review process must be strictly upheld. Reviewers are prohibited from disclosing, sharing, or utilizing the content of manuscripts under review outside the context of the review process itself, in accordance with the COPE Ethical Guidelines for Peer Reviewers.
  • Reviewers must not upload any part of a manuscript submitted for review—including text, figures, or data—to generative AI platforms or large language models for the purpose of assisting in evaluation, critique, or decision-making. Such actions constitute a breach of the authors’ privacy and intellectual property rights.
  • Peer review is a scholarly duty that must be conducted exclusively by human experts. The evaluative reasoning, nuanced judgment, and ethical discernment required in the peer review process are beyond the capacity of current AI technologies. Moreover, reliance on AI tools in this context risks introducing inaccurate, incomplete, or biased assessments. Therefore, all peer review reports and editorial decisions must reflect the independent, personal assessments of the reviewers and editors. Each reviewer is fully responsible and accountable for the content of their submitted review.
  • AI tools may be employed in a strictly limited capacity to enhance the linguistic clarity or perform translations of the review report. Should a reviewer choose to utilize such tools for these purposes, this use must be clearly disclosed at the time of report submission.
  • If a reviewer suspects the inappropriate or undisclosed use of generative AI within a manuscript under review, this concern must be promptly communicated to the editor for further investigation.
For Editors
Editors are duty-bound to preserve the confidentiality of all manuscripts submitted to the journal throughout the editorial and peer review process. Under no circumstances should peer-reviewed content be shared, disclosed, or utilized beyond those individuals directly involved in the evaluation process. This obligation is in accordance with the COPE Code of Conduct and Best Practice Guidelines for Journal Editors.
  • Editors must not upload submitted manuscripts—or any part thereof—to generative artificial intelligence (AI) platforms or large language models (LLMs) for the purpose of review, evaluation, or decision-making. Such actions risk violating the confidentiality, privacy, and intellectual property rights of the authors.
  • The editorial management and evaluation of scholarly manuscripts entail responsibilities that inherently require human judgment. Editors must not use generative AI or AI-assisted technologies to support evaluative or decision-making functions, as these tools lack the capacity for the critical analysis, ethical discernment, and nuanced reasoning required in scholarly publishing. The risk of these technologies producing inaccurate, incomplete, or biased outcomes further precludes their use in editorial decision-making. Editors remain fully responsible and accountable for the integrity of the editorial process, including final decisions and the official communication of those decisions to authors.
  • Editors are also prohibited from using generative AI tools to draft decision letters or summaries (e.g., abstracts) of unpublished research.
  • Notwithstanding the above, editors may use AI tools in a limited and appropriate manner, such as to assist in identifying potential peer reviewers.
  • If an editor suspects the use of generative AI in either a submitted manuscript or a referee report, they are expected to initiate an editorial investigation consistent with the journal’s AI policy and ethical guidelines.
ETHICS
Publication Ethics and Malpractice Statement
The Journal of Turkish World Studies is firmly committed to maintaining the highest standards of publication ethics and adheres to the Principles of Transparency and Best Practice in Scholarly Publishing as outlined by the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE), the Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ), the Open Access Scholarly Publishers Association (OASPA), and the World Association of Medical Editors (WAME), available at: https://publicationethics.org/guidance/guideline/principles-transparency-and-best-practice-scholarly-publishing
Manuscripts submitted for consideration must be original works that have not been previously published in any format, including full-text conference proceedings, and must not be under review by any other journal or publication concurrently.
All submissions undergo an initial editorial review followed by a rigorous double-blind peer review process conducted by at least two independent referees.
The journal considers the following acts to constitute unethical behavior: plagiarism, duplication, fraudulent authorship or denial of authorship, fabrication or falsification of research data, “salami slicing” (i.e., segmenting research to publish multiple papers), copyright infringement, and failure to disclose conflicts of interest.
Manuscripts found to be in violation of these ethical standards, whether before or after publication, will be subject to withdrawal or retraction. In accordance with COPE guidelines, any suspected cases of plagiarism, duplicate publication, or other forms of academic misconduct will be formally investigated and reported to the relevant authorities where appropriate.
Research Ethics
The Journal of Turkish World Studies adopts the aforementioned highest standards of research ethics, is based on compliance with internationally recognized ethical research principles and is in full compliance with the Declaration of Helsinki published by the World Medical Association. All responsibility for the compliance of the articles submitted to the journal with ethical rules belongs to the authors.
The following core principles must be observed in all research submitted to the journal:
  • Research must be designed, reviewed, and conducted in accordance with the principles of integrity, quality, and transparency.
  • Researchers and participants must be fully informed about the objectives, methodology, potential applications, requirements, and any foreseeable risks associated with participation in the study.
  • The confidentiality of data provided by participants, as well as the anonymity of respondents, must be preserved. The research design must respect the autonomy and dignity of all participants.
  • Participation in research must be entirely voluntary, with no element of coercion or undue influence.
  • The study must be planned to avoid any potential harm to participants. Researchers are obligated to minimize risk and protect the welfare of participants at all stages.
  • Research must be conducted independently, and any actual or potential conflicts of interest must be fully disclosed.
  • For experimental studies involving human subjects, written informed consent must be obtained from all participants. In the case of minors, individuals under guardianship, or persons with diminished capacity, consent must be obtained from their legal guardians.
  • If the research is to be conducted within the framework of an institution or organization, prior approval from the relevant institution must be secured.
  • For all studies involving human subjects, the manuscript must include a clear statement in the Methods section confirming that ethics committee approval was obtained from the relevant institution and that informed consent was received from all participants.
Author’s Responsibilities
It is the responsibility of the authors to ensure that their submitted manuscript complies with established scientific and ethical standards. Authors must guarantee that their submission is original, has not been previously published in any form, and is not under consideration for publication elsewhere, in any language. All applicable copyright laws and conventions must be observed. Any copyrighted material—such as tables, figures, or extensive quotations—may only be used with proper authorization and must be appropriately cited. All sources, including the ideas, data, and text of others, must be fully credited and referenced in accordance with academic conventions.
Each listed author must have made a direct and substantial academic contribution to the manuscript. Authorship credit should be based on all of the following criteria:
  • Significant involvement in the conceptualization and design of the study,
  • Active participation in data collection,
  • Contribution to data analysis and interpretation,
  • Involvement in drafting or critically revising the manuscript,
  • Participation in the planning, execution, and/or substantive revision of the work.
Tasks such as securing funding, data collection, or general supervision of the research team, while important, are not sufficient to qualify for authorship.
The sequence of authors in the byline should reflect a joint decision of all co-authors and must be clearly stated in the Copyright Agreement and Corresponding Author Statement Form. Individuals who have contributed to the research but do not meet the authorship criteria—such as those providing technical support, editorial assistance, or financial/material resources—should be acknowledged in the Acknowledgements section.
All authors are required to disclose any financial relationships, conflicts of interest, or competing interests that could in any way influence the research outcomes or the interpretation of findings.
If an author identifies a significant error or inaccuracy in their published work, it is their duty to promptly inform the Editor-in-Chief and to cooperate in issuing a correction or retraction as appropriate.
Responsibility for the Editor and Reviewers
The Editor-in-Chief evaluates all submitted manuscripts based solely on their scholarly merit, without regard to the authors’ ethnic origin, gender, sexual orientation, citizenship, religious beliefs, or political views. The Editor-in-Chief ensures the implementation of a fair and impartial double-blind peer review process and guarantees that all information regarding submitted manuscripts is treated with strict confidentiality prior to publication.
The Editor-in-Chief holds full responsibility for the content and overall academic quality of the journal. When necessary, errata will be published and corrections made to preserve the accuracy and integrity of the scholarly record.
To avoid conflicts of interest, the Editor-in-Chief must ensure that no such conflicts arise among authors, reviewers, or editorial board members. The authority to assign reviewers and to make final publication decisions lies solely with the Editor-in-Chief.
Peer reviewers are expected to be free of any conflicts of interest related to the manuscript’s subject, its authors, or its sources of funding. They must conduct their reviews objectively and constructively, providing academic evaluations grounded in expertise and scholarly standards.
Reviewers are obligated to maintain the confidentiality of all information contained in the manuscripts they review. They must not share or use the content in any form prior to publication. Any suspected instances of plagiarism or copyright infringement must be reported immediately to the Editor-in-Chief.
If a reviewer feels unqualified to evaluate a manuscript or cannot provide a timely review, they must inform the Editor-in-Chief and withdraw from the review process.
The Editor-in-Chief shall remind reviewers that all manuscripts are confidential documents and that reviewing them is a privileged interaction. Reviewers and members of the editorial board are prohibited from discussing manuscripts with any third parties. The anonymity of reviewers will be strictly maintained. In exceptional cases, the Editor-in-Chief may share one reviewer’s comments with another reviewer to clarify specific points—always with care to preserve anonymity.
PEER REVIEW
Peer Review Policies
Only manuscripts that are approved by all listed authors and have not been previously published or submitted for review elsewhere will be considered for evaluation by the The Journal of Turkish World Studies.
All submissions that pass the initial screening are subjected to a plagiarism check using the iThenticate software. Manuscripts found to contain unoriginal content or significant overlap with previous publications will be rejected or returned to the authors for clarification.
Following the plagiarism check, eligible manuscripts are assessed by the Editor-in-Chief based on the following criteria:
  • Originality and academic contribution,
  • Methodological rigor,
  • Relevance and importance of the topic within the scope of the journal,
  • Compliance with submission and formatting guidelines.
Manuscripts that meet these criteria are then forwarded to at least two national or international reviewers for evaluation under a double-blind peer review process.
The final decision to publish is made by the Editor-in-Chief, taking into account the reviewers’ recommendations. Authors are required to revise their manuscripts in accordance with the reviewers’ feedback before the article can be accepted for publication.
Responsibility for the Editor and Reviewers
The Editor-in-Chief assesses all submitted manuscripts exclusively on the basis of their scientific merit, without regard to the authors’ ethnic origin, gender, sexual orientation, nationality, religious beliefs, or political views. The Editor-in-Chief is responsible for ensuring a fair and impartial double-blind peer review process and guarantees the confidentiality of all information pertaining to submitted manuscripts prior to publication.
The Editor-in-Chief bears full responsibility for the content and overall quality of the journal. When necessary, he or she is obligated to issue corrections or publish errata to maintain the accuracy and integrity of the publication.
The Editor-in-Chief shall prevent any actual or potential conflicts of interest among authors, reviewers, and editorial members. He or she retains exclusive authority to appoint reviewers and holds final responsibility for decisions regarding the acceptance or rejection of manuscripts submitted to the journal.
Reviewers must be free of any conflicts of interest relating to the research under review, the authors, or the funding bodies. Their evaluations must be objective and based solely on scholarly merit.
Reviewers are required to maintain strict confidentiality regarding all aspects of submitted manuscripts. If they become aware of any instances of copyright infringement or plagiarism, they must promptly report such concerns to the Editor-in-Chief.
A reviewer who does not possess the necessary expertise to evaluate a manuscript, or who is unable to provide a timely review, must immediately inform the Editor-in-Chief and withdraw from the review process.
The Editor-in-Chief is responsible for informing reviewers that all manuscripts are confidential documents and that the review process constitutes a privileged form of communication. Reviewers and members of the editorial board must refrain from discussing manuscripts with any third party. The anonymity of reviewers must be rigorously protected. In exceptional circumstances, the Editor-in-Chief may disclose the content of one review to other reviewers for the purpose of clarifying specific issues.
Peer Review Process
Only those manuscripts that have been approved by all contributing authors and that have neither been previously published nor concurrently submitted to another journal shall be considered for evaluation.
Manuscripts that pass the initial editorial screening are subjected to plagiarism detection using the iThenticate software. Following this assessment, those that meet the criteria are reviewed by the Editor-in-Chief for their originality, methodological rigor, the significance of the subject matter, and alignment with the scope of the journal.
The Editor-in-Chief evaluates manuscripts solely based on their scientific merit, without consideration of the authors’ ethnic background, gender, nationality, religious affiliation, or political beliefs. A fair and impartial double-blind peer review process is ensured for all qualifying manuscripts.
Selected manuscripts are submitted to at least two external referees, either national or international, for independent evaluation. The final decision regarding publication is made by the Editor-in-Chief, contingent upon the authors' revision of the manuscript in accordance with the reviewers’ recommendations.
The Editor-in-Chief is responsible for ensuring the absence of any conflicts of interest among authors, editors, and reviewers, and retains ultimate authority over the acceptance or rejection of manuscripts for publication in the journal.
Reviewers are required to maintain objectivity in their evaluations. In the course of their review, they are expected to comment on the following criteria:
  • Does the manuscript present novel and significant findings?
  • Does the abstract accurately and clearly reflect the content of the manuscript?
  • Is the research problem of scholarly relevance and clearly articulated?
  • Are the methods described in sufficient detail and appropriately applied?
  • Are the interpretations and conclusions supported by the data and results?
  • Is the manuscript adequately referenced with relevant literature in the field?
  • Is the use of language appropriate and scholarly?
Reviewers must treat all information contained in submitted manuscripts as strictly confidential. They are obliged to notify the Editor-in-Chief should they become aware of any instance of copyright violation or plagiarism on the part of the authors.
Any reviewer who feels unqualified to assess the subject matter of a manuscript, or who anticipates being unable to complete the review in a timely manner, must promptly inform the Editor-in-Chief and withdraw from the review process.
The Editor-in-Chief informs all reviewers that manuscripts under evaluation constitute confidential material and that the review process is a privileged communication. Reviewers and members of the editorial board are strictly prohibited from discussing the content of the manuscripts with any third parties. The anonymity of reviewers must be preserved at all times.

TDİD is a publication of Ege University Institute of Turkish World Studies. It does not receive any payment from authors and other stakeholders and cannot make any payment to authors, referees and other stakeholders.

Editör

Late Modern Mediterranean History, Late Modern Asian History, Late Modern European History, Late Modern Urban History, Late Modern Discoveries and Colonialism History, Late Modern Russian History, Late Modern Renewal History

Editör Yardımcıları

Seçil Öraz Beşikçi
Res. Assist. Dr. Seçil ÖRAZ BEŞİKÇİ EGE ÜNİVERSİTESİ, TÜRK DÜNYASI ARAŞTIRMALARI ENSTİTÜSÜ
Political Science, European Studies, Studies of the Turkic World, International Relations Theories
Şima Doğan
Res. Assist. Dr. Şima DOĞAN EGE ÜNİVERSİTESİ, TÜRK DÜNYASI ARAŞTIRMALARI ENSTİTÜSÜ, TÜRK DÜNYASI EDEBİYATI ANABİLİM DALI
North-East (Altai, Khakas, Tuva, Sakha/Yakut) Turkic Dialects and Literatures

Alan Editörleri

Default avatar
Assoc. Prof. Dr. Erhan AKTAŞ KIRKLARELİ ÜNİVERSİTESİ
North-East (Altai, Khakas, Tuva, Sakha/Yakut) Turkic Dialects and Literatures
Hasan Uçar
Assoc. Prof. Dr. Hasan UÇAR EGE ÜNİVERSİTESİ, EDEBİYAT FAKÜLTESİ, SANAT TARİHİ BÖLÜMÜ, SANAT TARİHİ ANABİLİM DALI
Turkish-Islamic Arts History
Default avatar
Prof. Dr. Elem EYRİCE TEPECİKLİOĞLU Ankara Sosyal Bilimler Üniversitesi
Political Science, International Politics, African Studies, Regional Studies, Turkish Foreign Policy
Default avatar
Assoc. Prof. Hamit ÖZMAN EGE ÜNİVERSİTESİ, TÜRK DÜNYASI ARAŞTIRMALARI ENSTİTÜSÜ
Inflation, Monetary Policy, Monetary-Banking, Capital Market, International Finance
Ümit Şahin
Dr. Ümit ŞAHİN MİLLİ SAVUNMA ÜNİVERSİTESİ
Modern Turkic Languages and Literatures, North-East (Altai, Khakas, Tuva, Sakha/Yakut) Turkic Dialects and Literatures, Communication Studies, Dialectology
Tuna Yıldız
Assoc. Prof. Tuna YILDIZ ANKARA HACI BAYRAM VELİ ÜNİVERSİTESİ, EDEBİYAT FAKÜLTESİ, TÜRK HALK BİLİMİ BÖLÜMÜ
Turkish Folklore in the Türkiye Field, Intangible Cultural Heritage
Default avatar
Dr. Mehmet Önder DURAN Uşak Üniversitesi
Studies of the Turkic World, General Turkish History, Turkish Cultural History, Late Modern Russian History
Turkish Savannah Culture, Turkish Society and Community, History of The Byzantine, Political and Civilization History of Islam, Medieval European History, Medieval Cities, Medieval History (Other)
Bülent Akyay
Assoc. Prof. Dr. Bülent AKYAY TRAKYA ÜNİVERSİTESİ, BALKAN ARAŞTIRMA ENSTİTÜSÜ, BALKAN TARİHİ ANABİLİM DALI
Contemporary Military History, Contemporary Balkan History, Late Modern Military History, Late Modern Balkan History

Dil Editörleri

Default avatar
Prof. Dr. Muvaffak DURANLI EGE ÜNİVERSİTESİ
Language Studies
Gökçe Emeç Yücesoy
Res. Assist. Gökçe EMEÇ YÜCESOY EGE ÜNİVERSİTESİ, TÜRK DÜNYASI ARAŞTIRMALARI ENSTİTÜSÜ
Turkish Folklore Outside Türkiye, Turkish Folklore in the Türkiye Field, Turkish Folklore (Other)
Seçil Öraz Beşikçi
Res. Assist. Dr. Seçil ÖRAZ BEŞİKÇİ EGE ÜNİVERSİTESİ, TÜRK DÜNYASI ARAŞTIRMALARI ENSTİTÜSÜ
Political Science, European Studies, Studies of the Turkic World, International Relations Theories
Alimcan İnayet
Prof. Dr. Alimcan İNAYET EGE ÜNİVERSİTESİ, TÜRK DÜNYASI ARAŞTIRMALARI ENSTİTÜSÜ
Turkish Folklore Outside Türkiye

Yayın Kurulu

Erhan Aydın
Prof. Dr. Erhan AYDIN Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi
Old Turkic Language (Orhon, Uyghur, Karahan), Historical North East Turkish Language (Khwarezm, Kipchak, Chagatai)

by-nc.png  Journal of Turkish World Studies is licensed under a Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International license.