Metaverse Kavramı ve Öne Çıkan Terimler Üzerine Bibliyometrik Bir Analiz

Öz

Bu araştırmada, Metaverse kavramına dair yapılan çalışmaların haritasını çıkarmak amaçlanmıştır. Çalışmada, teknolojinin gelişmesiyle hayatımıza girmiş olan temel kavramlardan metaverse ya da evren ötesine ilişkin alan yazının bibliyometrik analiz kullanılarak sistematik bir özetinin yapılması ayrıca metaverse kavramı ile ilgili çalışma eğilimlerinin tespiti hedeflenmiştir. Analiz birimi olarak Web of Science ve Scopus veri tabanında taranan farklı içeriklerdeki çalışmaların verileri dikkate alınmıştır. Bu iki veri tabanından elde edilen çalışmalar, bibliyometrik çalışmalardan olan bibliyometrik analiz için Wosviewer yazılımı kullanılarak analiz edilmiştir. Web of Science ve Scopus veri tabanında taranan ve 1995-2024 yılları arasında yayınlanmış eserlerin verileri dikkate alınmıştır. Sonuç olarak metaverse kavramı ile ilgili en çok çalışmanın Çinde olduğu, en fazla çalışmanın 2023 yılında yapıldığını, en fazla kullanılan anahtar sözcüğün metaverse, sanal gerçeklik, artırılmış gerçeklik, blockchain ve yapay zekâ olduğu, en fazla atıf alan yazarların Sang-Min Park, Zehui Xiong, Dusit Niyato ve Young- Gab olduğu, Nanyang Teknoloji Üniversitesi, Sejong Üniversitesi, Romanya Craivo Üniversitesi, Malezya Ucsi Üniversitesi en çok eser veren kurumlar arasında olduğu görüldü. Ayrıca Dwivedi (2022), Park (2022a), Duan (2021), Wang (2023d) en fazla bibliyografik eşleşme olan yazarlar arasında olduğu tespit edildi.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• artırılmış gerçeklik
• bibliyometrik analiz
• blockchain
• metaverse
• sanal gerçeklik

A Bibliometric Analysis of the Metaverse Concept and Prominent Terms

Abstract

The aim of this study is to provide a systematic overview of the concept of the metaverse, a concept that has emerged with technological advancements, through bibliometric analysis. The study also aims to identify research trends related to the metaverse. Data from studies across different topics, sourced from the Web of Science and Scopus databases, were considered. The studies obtained from these two databases were analyzed using WOSViewer software for bibliometric analysis, focusing on publications indexed between 1995 and 2024.An analysis of 2,754 works related to the metaverse in the Web of Science database shows that the highest number of studies were published in 2023 (1,578) and 2022 (759), while the lowest number was in 1995 (1). The predominant publication types were journal articles (1,744) and conference papers (536). When examining the distribution of publications by country, the majority of studies were from China (770), with most publications being in English (2,673) and a smaller number in Spanish (38). Regarding the most frequently used keywords in metaverse-related publications, “Metaverse” appeared 1,317 times, “virtual reality” 402 times, “augmented reality” 207 times, “blockchain” 163 times, and “artificial intelligence” 118 times. Furthermore, publications indexed in SSCI (663), ESCI (505), and SCIE (1,229) were prominent. In the Scopus database, the highest number of studies on the metaverse were published in 2023 (2,857) and 2022 (1,181), while the lowest number were in 1995 (1), 2000 (1), and 2022 (1). The predominant publication types in Scopus were also journal articles (2,149) and conference papers (1,637). The majority of the studies originated from China (1,031), with most publications being in English (4,699) and Chinese (105). The most frequently used keywords in these publications were “Metaverse” (2,542 times), “virtual reality” (693 times), “augmented reality” (327 times), and “artificial intelligence” (176 times). This bibliometric analysis provides insight into the growing academic interest in the metaverse and highlights key trends and research areas in this rapidly developing field.

Keywords

• augmented reality
• bibliometric analysis
• blockchain
• metaverse
• virtual reality

References

1. Abbate, S ., Centobelli, P., Cerchione, R., Oropallo, E. & Riccio, E. (2022). A first bibliometric literature review on Metaverse. Technology and Engineering Management Conference (Temscon Europe),254-260.
2. Al, U. (2008). Türkiye’nin bilimsel yayın politikası: Atıf dizinlerine dayalı bibliyometrik bir yaklaşım. Doktora Tezi, Hacettepe Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Ankara.
3. Arslan, E. (2022). Sosyal bilim araştırmalarında Vosviewer ile bibliyometrik haritalama ve örnek bir uygulama. Anadolu Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 22(Özel Sayı 2), 33-56. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/download/article-file/2864384
4. Artsın, M. (2020). Bir metin madenciliği uygulaması: Vosviewer. Eskişehir Teknik Üniversitesi Bilim ve Teknoloji Dergisi B- Teorik Bilimler, 8(2), 344-354.
5. Ataman Yengin, D. (2023). Yeni sanal dünya olarak Metaverse’te E-Ticaret. Journal of Communication Science Researches, 3(1), 16-23.
6. Bailenson, J. N., K. Swinth, C. Hoyt, & S. Persky et al. (2005). The independent and interactive effects of embodied-agent appearance and behavior on self-report, cognitive, and behavioral markers of copresence in immersive virtual environments. Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments, 14(4), 379-393.
7. Christidis, K. & Devetsiokiotis, M. (2016). Blockchains and smart contracts for the IoT. IEEE Access, 4, 2292-2304.
8. Davis, A. Khazanchi, D ., Murphy, J ., Zigurs, I., & Owens, D. (2009). Avatars, people, and virtual worlds: Foundations for research in metaverses. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 10(2), 90-117.

9. Dirik, D., Eryılmaz, İ., & Erhan, T. (2023). Post-truth kavramı üzerine yapılan çalışmaların Vosviewer ile bibliyometrik analizi. Sosyal Mucit Academic Review, 4(2), 164-188.
10. Dwivedi, Yogesh K., et al. (2022). Metaverse beyond the hype: Multidisciplinary perspectives on emerging challenges, opportunities, and agenda for research, practice and policy. International Journal of Information Management, 66(2022), 102542. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2022.102542
11. Han, H.W. (2008). A study on typology of virtual world and its develop¬ment in metaverse. Journal of Digital Contents Society, 9(2), 317-323.
12. He, J., Ahmad, SF., Al-Razgan, M., Ali, YA., & Irshad, M. (2024). Factors affecting the adoption of metaverse in healthcare: The moderating role of digital division, and meta-culture. Heliyon, 10, 1-21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e28778
13. İnceoğlu, M.M., & Çiloğlugil, B. (2022). Use of metaverse in education. Computational Science and ItsApplication, 13377, 171-184. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-10536-4_12
14. Jauhiainen, J.S. (2024). The Metaverse: innovations and generative AI. International Journal of Innovation Studies, 1-20. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijis.2024.04.004.
15. Johri, A., Joshi, P., Kumar, S., & Joshi, G. (2024). Metaverse for sustainable development in a bibliometric analysis and systematic literature review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 435, 1-13. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.140610
16. Khan, M. A., & Salah, K. (2018). IoT security: Review, blockchain solutions, and open challenges. FutureGeneration Computer Systems, 82, 395–411. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.future.2017.11.022
17. Kye, B., Han, N., Kim, E., Park, Y., & Jo, S. (2021). Educational applications of metaverse: possibilities and limitations. J Educ Eval Health Prof, 18-32.
18. Lee, S. (2021). Log in Metaverse: Revolution of human×space×time (IS-115) spri.kr/posts/view/23165?code=issue_reports
19. Maghaydah, S., Al-Emran, M., Maheshwari, P., & Al-Sharaf, MA. (2024). Factors affecting metaverse adoption in education: A systematic review, adoption framework, and future research agenda. Heliyon, 10, 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e28602
20. Mahtari, S., Joko Siswanto, S., & Prahani, BK. (2024). A bibliometric analysis of STEM education in higher education. AIP Conf. Proc. 3116, 1-12. http://doi.org/10.1063/5.0210204
21. Milgram, P., & Kishino, F. A. (1994). Taxonomy of mixed reality visual dis¬plays. IEICE Trans Inf Syst, 77, 1321-1329.
22. Öztürk, N., & Kurutkan, M. N. (2020). Kalite yönetiminin bibliyometrik analiz yöntemi ile incelenmesi. Journal of Innovative Healthcare Practices (JOINIHP), 1(1), 1-13.
23. Park, SM., & Kim, YG. (2022). A Metaverse: Taxonomy, components, applications, and open challenges. IEEE Access, 10, 4209-4251.
24. Rehn, C., Gornitzki, C., Larsson, A., & Wadskog, D. (2014). Bibliometric handbook for Karolinska Institutet. Karolinska Institutet University Library Publications. https://kib.ki.se/sites/default/files/bibliometric_handbook_2014.pdf.
25. Rospigliosi, P. A. (2022). Metaverse or Simulacra? Roblox, minecraft, meta and the turn to virtual reality for education, socialisation and work. Interactive Learning Environments, 30(1), 1-3. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2022.2022899
26. Sarıtaş, M.T., & Topraklıoğlu, K. (2022). Systematic literature review on the use of metaverse in education. International Journal of Technology in Education (IJTE), 5(4), 586-607. https://doi.org/10.46328/ijte.319
27. Sirakaya, M., & Alsancak Sirakaya, D. (2018). Trends in educational augmented reality studies: A systematic review. Malaysian Online Journal of Educational Technology, 6(2), 60-74.
28. Smart, J., Cascio, J., & Paffendorf, J. (2007). Metaverse roadmap: pathway to the 3D web. Acceleration Studies Foundation, 1-28.
29. Tas, N., & Bolat, Y.I. (2022). Bibliometric mapping of metaverse in education. International Journal of Technology in Education (IJTE), 5(3), 440-458. https://doi.org/10.46328/ijte.323
30. Tlili, A., Huang, R., & Shehata, B. et al (2022). Is Metaverse in education a blessing or a curse: a combined content and bibliometric analysis. Smart Learning Environments, 9(24), 1-31. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-022-00205-x
31. Ulu, S., & Akdağ, M. (2015). Dergilerde yayınlanan hakem denetimli makalelerin bibliyometrik profili: Selçuk İletişim Örneği. Selçuk İletişim, 9(1), 5-21.
32. Umut Zan, B. (2012). Türkiye’de bilim dallarında karşılaştırmalı bibliyometrik analiz çalışması. Doktora Tezi, Ankara Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Ankara
33. Wu, P., Chen, D., & Zhang, R. (2024). Topic prevalence and trends of metaverse in healthcare: A bibliometric analysis. Data Science and Management, 7, 129-143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dsm.2023.12.003
34. Yılmaz, K. (2021). Sosyal bilimlerde ve eğitim bilimlerinde sistematik derleme, meta değerlendirme ve bibliyometrik analizler. Manas Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi, 10(2), 1457-1490.
35. Van Eck, N., & Waltman, L. (2010). Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics, 84(2), 523-538.
36. Van Leeuwen, T. N., Visser, M. S., Moed, H. F., Nederhof, T. J., & van Raan, A. F. J. (2003). Holy grail of science policy: Exploring and combining bibliometric tools in search of scientific excellence. Scientometrics, 57(2), 257-280.