BibTex RIS Cite

Türk araştırmacılar tarafından akademik yazılı söylemde kullanılan üst söylem belirleyicilerinin incelenmesi

Year 2017, Volume: 13 Issue: 1, 1 - 9, 01.06.2017

Abstract

Bu çalışmanın amacı akademik yazı söyleminde kişiler arası üst söylem belirleyicilerin sıklığını incelemek ve
Türk yazarların İngiliz dili eğitimi alanında yazılmış yüksek lisans tezlerinde kişilerarası üst söylemi nasıl
kullandığını araştırmaktır. Bu bütünce temelli çalışmada ikinci bir dilde yazan Türk yazarların son zamanlarda
yazmış olduğu 20 tez incelenmiştir. Tezler bu kullanımlar için taranmış ve buna ek olarak tezlerin yöntem, sonuç
ve tartışma bölümleri de ayrıca incelenmiştir. Kişiler arası üst söylem belirleyicilerinin kullanımına ilişkin
yapılan bu derinlemesine çalışma olasılık, kesinlik ve tutum belirleyicilerin hepsinin belirli bir derecede Türk
yazarlar tarafından kullanıldığını gösterirken, en sık tutum belirleyicilerin kullanıldığını göstermiştir. Diğer bir
taraftan, yazarlar arasında kişisel belirleyicilerin kullanımına ilişkin farklılıklar bulunmuştur. Tez bölümlerinin
analizi ortak sonuçlar göstermiştir

Analysis of metadiscourse markers in academic written discourse produced by Turkish researchers

Year 2017, Volume: 13 Issue: 1, 1 - 9, 01.06.2017

Abstract

This study aims at examining the frequency of interpersonal metadiscourse markers in academic written discourse and investigating the way Turkish writers use interpersonal metadiscourse, namely in MA dissertations from one major academic field; English language teaching (ELT). A corpus based research is applied by examining a total of 20 dissertations written recently by Turkish writers writing in a second language. The dissertations were searched for all these expressions and further analysis was made by examining three sections of dissertations -methodology, results, and discussion. In-depth analysis based on the use of interpersonal metadiscourse markers showed that while ‘hedges’, ‘empathics (boosters)’ and ‘attitude markers’ are all used by Turkish writers to a certain extent, ‘attitude markers’ are found to be the most frequent ones . On the other hand, with respect to the use of personal markers, differences were found among the writers. The analysis of dissertation sections revealed common results. Keywords: Metadiscourse; interpersonal metadiscourse markers; academic writing; second language acquisition; rhetoric

There are 0 citations in total.

Details

Other ID JA89TA28UJ
Journal Section Research Article
Authors

Eda Duruk This is me

Publication Date June 1, 2017
Published in Issue Year 2017 Volume: 13 Issue: 1

Cite

APA Duruk, E. (2017). Analysis of metadiscourse markers in academic written discourse produced by Turkish researchers. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 13(1), 1-9.
AMA Duruk E. Analysis of metadiscourse markers in academic written discourse produced by Turkish researchers. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies. June 2017;13(1):1-9.
Chicago Duruk, Eda. “Analysis of Metadiscourse Markers in Academic Written Discourse Produced by Turkish Researchers”. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies 13, no. 1 (June 2017): 1-9.
EndNote Duruk E (June 1, 2017) Analysis of metadiscourse markers in academic written discourse produced by Turkish researchers. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies 13 1 1–9.
IEEE E. Duruk, “Analysis of metadiscourse markers in academic written discourse produced by Turkish researchers”, Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 1–9, 2017.
ISNAD Duruk, Eda. “Analysis of Metadiscourse Markers in Academic Written Discourse Produced by Turkish Researchers”. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies 13/1 (June 2017), 1-9.
JAMA Duruk E. Analysis of metadiscourse markers in academic written discourse produced by Turkish researchers. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies. 2017;13:1–9.
MLA Duruk, Eda. “Analysis of Metadiscourse Markers in Academic Written Discourse Produced by Turkish Researchers”. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, vol. 13, no. 1, 2017, pp. 1-9.
Vancouver Duruk E. Analysis of metadiscourse markers in academic written discourse produced by Turkish researchers. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies. 2017;13(1):1-9.