Relationship between the Attidutes of Science Teachers towards Technology and Their Teaching Styles

Year 2015, Volume: 2 Issue: 3, 67 - 78, 01.10.2015

Sevilay Karamustafaoğlu Recep Çakır Ayşegül Celep

https://doi.org/10.17275/per.15.03.2.3

Cited By: 1

Abstract

In this study, it is aimed to investigate the relationship between the attitudes of science education teachers towards technology and teaching styles. Correlational survey research was used. The sample of the study consists of 102 science education teachers (male=48, female=54) working in different schools in Amasya province of Turkey. In this study, “Technology Attitude Scale” developed by Yavuz and Coşkun (2008) and “Teaching Style Scale” developed by Grasha (1996) were used to collect the data. Frequencies and percentiles were used for descriptive data analysis and t-test and pearson correlation were used for inferential data analysis. According to the descriptive results, expert and delegator teaching styles are found high and their formal authority, personal model and facilitator teaching styles are found at medium level. The inferential results of the study indicated that there is a positive correlation between the participants’ technology attitude and teaching style. It was observed that there is a positive correlation between the attitudes towards technology and expert, formal authority, personal model, facilitator and delegator teaching styles. This study was only carried out in Amasya city center. However, other similar studies can be conducted in different regions or for other disciplines so that the obtained results can be compared.

Keywords

Science education teachers, Attitude towards technology, Teaching styles

References

• Akpınar, B. & Turan, M. (2002). İlköğretim Okullarında Fen ve Teknoloji Eğitiminde Materyal Kullanımı. [Use of Materyal in Science Education in Elementary Schools] V. Ulusal Fen Bilimleri ve Matematik Eğitimi Kongresi, Bildiriler Kitabı, Cilt: 1, s: 219–225, ODTÜ, Ankara.
• Alkan, C. (1997). Eğitim Teknolojisi. [Educational Technology]Ankara: Anı Yayıncılık.
• Ayvacı, H. Ş. , Er Nas, S. , Şenel, T. , & Nas, H. (2007). Öğretmen Adaylarının Öğretim Teknolojilerini Kullanmaya Yönelik Düşünceleri ve bu Teknolojileri Kullanma Yeterlilikleri. [Thoughts and Competencies of Preservice Teachers towards Using Instructional Technologies] 7th International Educational Technology Conference, Near East University.
• Baki, A., Yalçınkaya, H.A., Özpınar, İ. & Uzun, S.Ç. (2009). Comparing views of primary school mathematics teachers and prospective mathematics teachers about instructional technologies. Turkish Journal of Computer and Mathematics Education, 1(1), 65-83.
• Başaran, İ. E. , (1978). Eğitime Giriş.[Introduction to the Education] Ankara: Bimaş Matbaacılık
• Bilgin, İ., Uzuntiryaki, E. & Geban Ö. (2002). Kimya Öğretmenlerinin Öğretim Yaklaşımlarının Lise 1. ve Lise 2. Sınıf Öğrencilerinin Kimya Dersi Başarı ve Tutumuna Etkisinin İncelenmesi. [The Investigation of the Effects of Chemistry Teachers’ Teaching Approaches on First and Second Grade High School Students’ Achievement and Attitudes] V. Ulusal Fen Bilimleri ve Matematik Eğitimi Kongresi, Bildiriler Kitabı, Cilt: 1, s: 156–159, ODTÜ, Ankara.
• Bilgin İ. & Bahar, M. (2008). Investigation of the relationship between teaching and learning styles of primary school teachers. Gazi Üniversity Journal of Gazi Educational Faculty, 28(1), 19-38.
• Boz Y. & Uzuntiryaki, E. (2006). Fen Öğretmen Adaylarının Öz Yeterlik İnançlarının Öğretme Stillerine Etkisi Üzerine Bir Çalışma. [A Study of the Effects of Preservice Science Teachers’ Self-Efficacy Beliefs on Their Teaching Styles] VII. Ulusal Fen Bilimleri ve Matematik Eğitimi Kongresinde Sunulan Bildiri, Gazi Üniversitesi, Ankara.
• Büyükkaragöz, S. & Çivi, C. (1997), Genel Öğretim Yöntemleri, [General Teaching Methods] Konya: Öz Eğitim Yayınları.
• Çepni, S. (2010). Araştırma ve Proje Çalışmalarına Giriş [Introduction of the Research and Project Studies] (5. Baskı), Trabzon
• Çilenti, K. (1988). Eğitim Teknolojisi ve Öğretim. [Educational Technology and Instruction] Ankara: Kadıoğlu Matbaası.
• Demirel, Ö. (2003). Öğretimde planlama ve değerlendirme: Öğretme sanatı [Instructional planning and evaluation: Teaching art] (Altıncı baskı). Ankara: PegemA Yayıncılık.
• Eisele J.E. & Eisele M.E. (1994). Eğitim Teknolojisi: Programa Destek Bir Planlama ve Kaynak Klavuz [Educational Technology: A Planning And Resource Guide Supporting Curriculum] (Çev: C. Alkan ). Eskişehir: ETAM Basın Yayın.
• Eliküçük, H. (2006). Teachers' competency to use technology in the process of learning and teaching. Unpublished Master Thesis, Marmara Üniversity, İstanbul, Turkey
• Ergin, A.(1995). Öğretim Teknolojisi İletişim. [Instructional Technology, Communication] Ankara: Pegem Yayınları.
• Galpin, V.C. & Sander, I.D. (2007). Perceptions of computer science at a South African University. Computers & Education, 49:1330–1356.
• Grasha, A.F. (1994). A Matter of style: the teacher as expert, formal authority,personal model, facilitator and delegator. College Teaching, 42(4), 12-20.
• Grasha, A.F. (1996). Teaching with Style: Enchancing Learning By Understanding Teaching and Learning Styles, Pittsburg, PA: Alliance Publishers.
• Grasha, A.F. (2002). The dynamics of one-on-one teaching. College Teaching, 50(4), 139-146.
• Grasha, A.F. (2003). Teaching with style: the integration of teaching and learning styles in the classroom. Social Studies, 94(4), 179-187.
• Gunter, G., Gunter, R.E. & Wiens, G.A. (1998). Teaching Pre-Service Teachers Technology: An Innovative Approach. Paper Presented at the SITE 98: Society for Information Technology and Teacher Education International Conference, 9th, Washington, DC, March 10-14, 6p
• Gündüz, Ş. & Odabaşı, F (2004). The importance of instructional technologies and material development course at pre-service teacher education in information age. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology - TOJET, 3(1):43-48
• Karamustafaoğlu, O. (2006). Fen ve teknoloji öğretmenlerinin öğretim materyalleri kullanma düzeyleri. [Science and technology teachers’ level of using instructional materials] A.Ü. Bayburt Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 1(1), 90-101.
• Karamustafaoğlu, O., Çakır, R. & Topuz, F.G. (2011). Fen Öğretiminde Öğretmenlerin Derslerinde Materyal ve Teknoloji Kullanımına Yönelik Tutumlarının İncelenmesi. [ Investigation of Teachers’ Attitudes toward Using Technology and Materials in Teaching Science] X. Ulusal Fen ve Matematik Kongresi, Niğde Üniversitesi, Niğde.
• Karataş, E. (2004). Bilgisayara giriş dersini veren öğretmenlerin öğretme stilleri ile dersi alan öğrencilerin öğrenme stillerinin eşleştirilmesinin öğrenci başarısı üzerindeki etkisi. [The Effects of matching teaching styles of teachers gave introduction computer lessons with students’ learning styles on their achievement] Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Gazi Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Ankara.
• Köseoğlu, P. & Soran, H. (2006). The attitudes of biology teachers towards material use. Hacettepe University Journal of Education, 30, 159-165
• Lindsay, E. K. (1999). Analysis of matches of teaching styles, learning styles and the uses of educational technology. EdD Dissertation. America: North Carolina State University.
• Lloyd, D.G. (2002). Teaching styles and faculty attitudes towards computer technology in teaching and learning at a college in Ontario. PhD Dissertation. Canada: University of Toronto.
• Mendoza, S. (2004). Teaching Styles of Technological Institutes Faculty in El Salvador. PhD Dissertation. El Salvador: Capella University UMI Number: 3127201.
• Mitchell, J.L. (2000). The effect of matching teaching style with learning style on achievement and attitudes for women in a web-based distance education course. PhD Dissertation. Indiana: School of Graduate Studies Department of Curriculum, Instruction and Media Technology Indiana State University.
• Namlu, A.G. , (1998). Öğretmenlerin eğitimde teknolojiye yönelik tutumları. [Teachers attitudes towards technology in education] Anadolu Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 8(1-2),184-200.
• Nelson, E. D. (2001). A study of the relationship between teaching style and the use of computers in elementary classrooms Ed.D. Dissertation, University of Central Florida, United States-Florida.
• Oktay S., & Çakır R. (2013). Bilgi toplumu olma yolunda öğretmenlerin teknoloji kullanımları. [Teachers’ use of technology as becoming information society] Gazi Üniversitesi Endüstriyel Sanatlar Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 30, 35-54.
• Quitadamo, I. J. (2002). Critical thinking in higher education: the influence of teaching styles and peer collaboration on science and math learning. PhD Dissertation. Washington: Faculty of the Graduate School of Education University of Washington State.
• Smuth, R. P. (2002). The effect of teaching style-learning style match/mismatch on learning effectiveness in computer-based training. PhD Dissertation, Texas A&M University, United States-Texas.
• Sungur, N. (2005), Gelişim Öğrenme ve Öğretim: Kuramdan Uygulamaya [Development of Learning and Teaching: From Theory to Practice] (12. Baskı), Ankara: Gazi Kitabevi.
• Şahin, T.Y. (2003). Student teacher’s perceptions of instructional technology: developing materials based on a constructivist approach. British Journal of Educational Technology, 34(1), 67-74.
• Uyangör, S.M. & Ece, D.K. (2010). The attitudes of the prospective mathematics teachers towards instructional technologies and material development course. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology –,TOJET, 9(1), 213-220.
• Üredi, L. (2006). I. and II. level primary education teachers' perceptions about teaching profession according to their styles preference. Unpublished PhD Dissertation. Marmara University, Educational Science Institute, İstanbul, Turkey.
• Yanpar, T. (2005). Öğretim Teknolojileri ve Materyal Geliştirme. [Instructional Technology and Material Development] Ankara: Anı Yayıncılık
• Yapıcı, M. & Leblebiciler, N. H. (2007). Teachers’ Views with regard to new primary school curriculum. Elementary Education Online, 6 (3): 480-490.
• Yavuz, S. (2005). Developing a technology attitude scale for pre-service chemistry teachers. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology – TOJET, 4, 1, 17-25.
• Yavuz, S. & Coşkun, A.E. (2008). Attitudes and perceptions of elementary teaching through the use of technology in education. Hacettepe University Journal of Education, 34, 276-286.
• Yeşilyurt, E. (2006). Factors which affect the usage conditions of the materials which teachers use. Unpublished Master Thesis, Fırat University, Social Science Institute, Elazığ, Turkey